Clinical value of single versus composite provocative clinical tests in the assessment of painful shoulder

Diagnostic Performance of Belly-Press Angle in Predicting the Severity of Subscapularis Tear

BACKGROUND

Neglected partial subscapularis tears often cause functional impairment even after repair of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tear is done. Numerous physical examinations for detecting partial subscapularis tears have been described in previous studies.

PURPOSE

To analyze the relationship between the preoperative clinical features and the severity of a partial subscapularis tear and to provide diagnostic clues for patients requiring subscapularis repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 286 patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery between 2020 and 2022. Preoperative clinical features, including range of motion, functional scores, muscle strength ratio, modified belly-press test (measuring belly-press angle), and bear-hug test, were collected. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation was done according to the Yoo and Rhee classification. Types of subscapularis tear, supraspinatus lesion, and biceps lesion were recorded during arthroscopic surgery. A comparison of preoperative clinical features between the no-repair group (type 2A or less) and surgical repair group (type 2B or more) was done. The optimal cutoff value of the belly-press angle was determined and the diagnostic performance of the belly-press angle, bear-hug test, and MRI were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Among 286 patients, 189 (66.1%) had subscapularis tears with type 2A or more. There was a significant difference in muscle strength ratio of the belly-press (P < .001), belly-press angle (P < .001), and bear-hug test (P < .001) between the no-repair group (type 2A or less) and the surgical repair group (type 2B or more). With a belly-press angle of 15° as a new cutoff value, the modified belly-press test showed 67.6% sensitivity, 73.9% specificity, and 69.6% accuracy in detecting type 2B or higher subscapularis tear.

CONCLUSION

Patients with type 2A and 2B subscapularis tears (according to the Yoo and Rhee classification) showed differences in belly-press strength ratio, belly-press angle, and bear-hug test. The cutoff value of the 15° belly-press angle showed an accuracy of 69.6% in detecting subscapularis tears with type 2B or higher.

Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of common shoulder injuries in sport: grading the evidence - a statement paper commissioned by the Danish Society of Sports Physical Therapy (DSSF)

This statement paper summarises and appraises the evidence on diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of common shoulder injuries in sports. We systematically searched Medline and Embase. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool was applied to evaluate the overall quality of evidence.For diagnosis, we included 19 clinical tests from mixed populations. Tests for anterior instability, biceps-labrum complex injuries and full subscapularis rupture had high diagnostic accuracy (low to moderate quality of evidence).For prevention, the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, the Shoulder Control, the FIFA 11+ shoulder injury prevention programmes, and a baseball-specific programme (range of motion, stretching, dynamic stability and strengthening exercises) showed moderate to large effect size in reducing the risk of shoulder injury compared with no intervention (very low to moderate quality of evidence).For treatment, a rehabilitation programme including stretching, ice packs, electrotherapy and compression, and strengthening exercises showed a large effect size in reducing pain and disability compared with no intervention in athletes with subacromial impingement syndrome (very low to moderate quality of evidence). For the treatment of supraspinatus tendinopathy, hyperthermia treatment (heating the skin to 38°C-40°C) resulted in large effect size in reducing pain and disability compared with ultrasound or pendular swinging and stretching exercises (moderate quality of evidence). Strengthening exercise alone or in combination with stretching exercises promoted a large effect in reducing shoulder pain (cohort studies, no comparators) (very low quality of evidence). The quality of evidence for most estimates was low to moderate, indicating that future high-quality research may alter our recommendations for clinical practice.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests for Subscapularis Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background:

Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the diagnostic accuracy of shoulder clinical tests do not reach conclusions regarding subscapularis tears.

Purpose:

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of commonly used clinical tests for subscapularis tears.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

An electronic literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library/Central. Eligibility criteria were original clinical studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests to diagnose the presence of rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis.

Results:

The electronic literature search returned 2212 records, of which 13 articles were eligible. Among 8 tests included in the systematic review, the lift-off test was most frequently reported (12 studies). Four tests were eligible for meta-analysis: bear-hug test, belly-press test, internal rotation lag sign (IRLS), and lift-off test. The highest pooled sensitivity was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.28-0.79) for the bear-hug test, while the lowest pooled sensitivity was 0.32 (95% CI, 0.13-0.61), for the IRLS. In all tests, pooled specificity was >0.90.

Conclusion:

Among the 4 clinical tests eligible for meta-analysis (bear-hug test, belly-press test, IRLS, and lift-off test), all had pooled specificity >0.90 but pooled sensitivity <0.60. No single clinical test is sufficiently reliable to diagnose subscapularis tears.

Registration:

PROSPERO (CRD42019137019).

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Special Tests for Rotator Cuff Tear: The ROW Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to assess diagnostic accuracy of 15 shoulder special tests for rotator cuff tears.

DESIGN

From February 2011 to December 2012, 208 participants with shoulder pain were recruited in a cohort study.

RESULTS

Among tests for supraspinatus tears, Jobe test had a sensitivity of 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80%-96%), specificity of 62% (95% CI, 53%-71%), and likelihood ratio of 2.30 (95% CI, 1.79-2.95). The full can test had a sensitivity of 70% (95% CI, 59%-82%) and a specificity of 81% (95% CI, 74%-88%). Among tests for infraspinatus tears, external rotation lag signs at 0 degrees had a specificity of 98% (95% CI, 96%-100%) and a likelihood ratio of 6.06 (95% CI, 1.30-28.33), and the Hornblower sign had a specificity of 96% (95% CI, 93%-100%) and likelihood ratio of 4.81 (95% CI, 1.60-14.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Jobe test and full can test had high sensitivity and specificity for supraspinatus tears, and Hornblower sign performed well for infraspinatus tears. In general, special tests described for subscapularis tears have high specificity but low sensitivity. These data can be used in clinical practice to diagnose rotator cuff tears and may reduce the reliance on expensive imaging.

Impacts of differences in epidemiological case definitions on prevalence for upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate prevalence based on variations in case definitions used for epidemiological studies of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).

BACKGROUND

Prior studies of MSDs have mostly relied on a single case definition based on questionnaires.

METHOD

In a multicenter prospective cohort study, we systematically collected data to evaluate impacts of differences in case definitions of MSDs on prevalence of three common musculoskeletal disorders: (a) shoulder tendinosis, (b) lateral epicondylalgia, and (c) carpal tunnel syndrome. Production workers were from 21 employment settings in three diverse U.S. states and performed widely varying work. All workers completed laptop-administered structured interviews, two standardized physical examinations, and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Case definitions included symptoms only, and symptoms plus physical examinations and/or NCS.

RESULTS

A total of 1,227 subjects had complete health data at baseline. The prevalence for shoulder tendinosis is 23.0% if only glenohumeral pain is used for a case definition, compared with 8.0% if a combination of pain plus a positive supraspinatus test is used. The prevalence for lateral epicondylalgia varied on the basis of lateral elbow pain (12.0%), pain plus tenderness on palpation (9.9%), or pain plus tenderness on palpation plus resisted wrist or middle finger extension (3.5%). Carpal tunnel syndrome prevalence varied on the basis of tingling or numbness in a median nerve-served digit (29.9%) or tingling or numbness plus NCS abnormalities consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome (9.0%).

CONCLUSION

Variations in epidemiological case definitions have major impacts on prevalence of common MSDs. Wide-ranging differences in prevalence may have impacts on purported risk factors that need to be determined.

Validation of the Simple Shoulder Test in a Portuguese-Brazilian population. Is the latent variable structure and validation of the Simple Shoulder Test Stable across cultures?

BACKGROUND

The validation of widely used scales facilitates the comparison across international patient samples. The objective of this study was to translate, culturally adapt and validate the Simple Shoulder Test into Brazilian Portuguese. Also we test the stability of factor analysis across different cultures.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to translate, culturally adapt and validate the Simple Shoulder Test into Brazilian Portuguese. Also we test the stability of factor analysis across different cultures.

METHODS

The Simple Shoulder Test was translated from English into Brazilian Portuguese, translated back into English, and evaluated for accuracy by an expert committee. It was then administered to 100 patients with shoulder conditions. Psychometric properties were analyzed including factor analysis, internal reliability, test-retest reliability at seven days, and construct validity in relation to the Short Form 36 health survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

Factor analysis demonstrated a three factor solution. Cronbach's alpha was 0.82. Test-retest reliability index as measured by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.84. Associations were observed in the hypothesized direction with all subscales of SF-36 questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The Simple Shoulder Test translation and cultural adaptation to Brazilian-Portuguese demonstrated adequate factor structure, internal reliability, and validity, ultimately allowing for its use in the comparison with international patient samples.

Validation of clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy for the detection of rotator cuff lesions

Limited evidence exists regarding the validity of clinical examination for the detection of shoulder pathology. We therefore wished to establish the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of rotator cuff disorders against findings at arthroscopy. Using recognised tests for specific shoulder lesions, 117 patients with shoulder symptoms awaiting surgery were examined in a standard manner. The diagnoses were categorised and compared with abnormalities found on MRI and at surgery. Results were cross-tabulated to determine the above parameters. Ninety-four patients formed the study group with a mean age of 51 years. The median duration of symptoms was 45 weeks. For clinical examination, sensitivity and specificity to detect a tear or rupture of supraspinatus were 30 % (16/54) and 38 % (15/40) and, for the detection of any pathology, were 94 % (67/71) and 22 % (5/23), respectively, compared with arthroscopy. Correspondingly, the sensitivity of MRI compared with arthroscopy to detect a tear or rupture of supraspinatus was 90 % (28/31) with a specificity of 70 % (46/53), whereas for the detection of any abnormality, the sensitivity was 92 % (65/71) with a specificity of 48 % (11/23). The sensitivity of detecting any rotator cuff abnormality is high when examination and MRI is compared with arthroscopy with the specificity being greater with MRI than examination. In patients with shoulder symptoms severe enough to consider surgery, clinical assessment followed by specific imaging may help define the pathology in order to direct appropriate management.

Clinical tests for the diagnosis of rotator cuff disease

Several tests have been described to examine the shoulder. However, there is a lack of consensus on clinical assessment of patients with shoulder pain and suspected rotator cuff pathology. This review reports the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for rotator cuff pathology. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 21 clinical tests for rotator cuff pathology are reported from the available literature. Twenty studies investigated supraspinatus pathology, 12 infraspinatus pathology, and 9 subscapularis pathology. Most tests for rotator cuff pathology are inaccurate, and the recent literature shows that there is insufficient evidence to recommend 1 clinical test over another for diagnosis of rotator cuff pathology. Poor diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for rotator cuff pathology may be related to the close relationships of structures in the shoulder, to a lack of understanding of anatomical basis of the tests, or to their lack of reproducibility.