Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A New Generation of Breakthrough Technology in Clinical Imaging

Modern low-field MRI

This narrative review explores recent advancements and applications of modern low-field (≤ 1 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in musculoskeletal radiology. Historically, high-field MRI systems (1.5 T and 3 T) have been the standard in clinical practice due to superior image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio. However, recent technological advancements in low-field MRI offer promising avenues for musculoskeletal imaging. General principles of low-field MRI systems are being introduced, highlighting their strengths and limitations compared to high-field counterparts. Emphasis is placed on advancements in hardware design, including novel magnet configurations, gradient systems, and radiofrequency coils, which have improved image quality and reduced susceptibility artifacts particularly in musculoskeletal imaging. Different clinical applications of modern low-field MRI in musculoskeletal radiology are being discussed. The diagnostic performance of low-field MRI in diagnosing various musculoskeletal pathologies, such as ligament and tendon injuries, osteoarthritis, and cartilage lesions, is being presented. Moreover, the discussion encompasses the cost-effectiveness and accessibility of low-field MRI systems, making them viable options for imaging centers with limited resources or specific patient populations. From a scientific standpoint, the amount of available data regarding musculoskeletal imaging at low-field strengths is limited and often several decades old. This review will give an insight to the existing literature and summarize our own experiences with a modern low-field MRI system over the last 3 years. In conclusion, the narrative review highlights the potential clinical utility, challenges, and future directions of modern low-field MRI, offering valuable insights for radiologists and healthcare professionals seeking to leverage these advancements in their practice.

Feasibility of 3D MRI fingerprinting for rapid knee cartilage T1, T2, and T1ρ mapping at 0.55T: Comparison with 3T

Low-field strength scanners present an opportunity for more inclusive imaging exams and bring several challenges including lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and longer scan times. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a rapid quantitative multiparametric method that can enable multiple quantitative maps simultaneously. To demonstrate the feasibility of an MRF sequence for knee cartilage evaluation in a 0.55T system we performed repeatability and accuracy experiments with agar-gel phantoms. Additionally, five healthy volunteers (age 32 ± 4 years old, 2 females) were scanned at 3T and 0.55T. The MRI acquisition protocols include a stack-of-stars T1ρ-enabled MRF sequence, a VIBE sequence with variable flip angles (VFA) for T1 mapping, and fat-suppressed turbo flash (TFL) sequences for T2 and T1ρ mappings. Double-Echo steady-state (DESS) sequence was also used for cartilage segmentation. Acquisitions were performed at two different field strengths, 0.55T and 3T, with the same sequences but protocols were slightly different to accommodate differences in signal-to-noise ratio and relaxation times. Cartilage segmentation was done using five compartments. T1, T2, and T1ρ values were measured in the knee cartilage using both MRF and conventional relaxometry sequences. The MRF sequence demonstrated excellent repeatability in a test-retest experiment with model agar-gel phantoms, as demonstrated with correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Underestimation of T1 values was observed on both field strengths, with the average global difference between reference values and the MRF being 151 ms at 0.55T and 337 ms at 3T. At 0.55T, MRF measurements presented significant biases but strong correlations with the reference measurements. Although a larger error was present in T1 measurements, MRF measurements trended similarly to the conventional measurements for human subjects and model agar-gel phantoms.

Deep Learning Reconstructed New-Generation 0.55 T MRI of the Knee-A Prospective Comparison With Conventional 3 T MRI

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare deep learning reconstructed (DLR) 0.55 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality, identification, and grading of structural anomalies and reader confidence levels with conventional 3 T knee MRI in patients with knee pain following trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study of 26 symptomatic patients (5 women) includes 52 paired DLR 0.55 T and conventional 3 T MRI examinations obtained in 1 setting. A novel, commercially available DLR algorithm was employed for 0.55 T image reconstruction. Four board-certified radiologists reviewed all images independently and graded image quality, noted structural anomalies and their respective reporting confidence levels for the presence or absence, as well as grading of bone, cartilage, meniscus, ligament, and tendon lesions. Image quality and reader confidence levels were compared (P < 0.05, significant), and MRI findings were correlated between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI using Cohen kappa (κ).

RESULTS

In reader's consensus, good image quality was found for DLR 0.55 T MRI and 3 T MRI (3.8 vs 4.1/5 points, P = 0.06). There was near-perfect agreement between 0.55 T DLR and 3 T MRI regarding the identification of structural anomalies for all readers (each κ ≥ 0.80). Substantial to near-perfection agreement between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI was reported for grading of cartilage (κ = 0.65-0.86) and meniscus lesions (κ = 0.71-1.0). High confidence levels were found for all readers for DLR 0.55 T and 3 T MRI, with 3 readers showing higher confidence levels for reporting cartilage lesions on 3 T MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, new-generation 0.55 T DLR MRI provides good image quality, comparable to conventional 3 T MRI, and allows for reliable identification of internal derangement of the knee with high reader confidence.

Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Parameters in Diffusion MRI of the Calf

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the dependence of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) parameters measured in the human calf on B0. Methods: Diffusion-weighted image data of eight healthy volunteers were acquired using five b-values (0-600 s/mm2) at rest and after muscle activation at 0.55 and 7 T. The musculus gastrocnemius mediale (GM, activated) was assessed. The perfusion fraction f and diffusion coefficient D were determined using segmented fits. The dependence on field strength was assessed using Student's t-test for paired samples and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A biophysical model built on the three non-exchanging compartments of muscle, venous blood, and arterial blood was used to interpret the data using literature relaxation times. Results: The measured perfusion fraction of the GM was significantly lower at 7 T, both for the baseline measurement and after muscle activation. For 0.55 and 7 T, the mean f values were 7.59% and 3.63% at rest, and 14.03% and 6.92% after activation, respectively. The biophysical model estimations for the mean proton-density-weighted perfusion fraction were 3.37% and 6.50% for the non-activated and activated states, respectively. Conclusions: B0 may have a significant effect on the measured IVIM parameters. The blood relaxation times suggest that 7 T IVIM may be arterial-weighted whereas 0.55 T IVIM may exhibit an approximately equal weighting of arterial and venous blood.

New-Generation 0.55 T MRI of the Knee-Initial Clinical Experience and Comparison With 3 T MRI

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the detection rate of and reader confidence in 0.55 T knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings with 3 T knee MRI in patients with acute trauma and knee pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 0.55 T and 3 T knee MRI of 25 symptomatic patients (11 women; median age, 38 years) with suspected internal derangement of the knee was obtained in 1 setting. On the 0.55 T system, a commercially available deep learning image reconstruction algorithm was used (Deep Resolve Gain and Deep Resolve Sharp; Siemens Healthineers), which was not available on the 3 T system. Two board-certified radiologists reviewed all images independently and graded image quality parameters, noted MRI findings and their respective reporting confidence level for the presence or absence, as well as graded the bone, cartilage, meniscus, ligament, and tendon lesions. Image quality and reader confidence levels were compared ( P < 0.05 = significant), and clinical findings were correlated between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI by calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Image quality was rated higher at 3 T compared with 0.55 T studies (each P ≤ 0.017). Agreement between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI for the detection and grading of bone marrow edema and fractures, ligament and tendon lesions, high-grade meniscus and cartilage lesions, Baker cysts, and joint effusions was perfect for both readers. Overall identification and grading of cartilage and meniscal lesions showed good agreement between high- and low-field MRI (each ICC > 0.76), with lower agreement for low-grade cartilage (ICC = 0.77) and meniscus lesions (ICC = 0.49). There was no difference in readers' confidence levels for reporting lesions of bone, ligaments, tendons, Baker cysts, and joint effusions between 0.55 T and 3 T (each P > 0.157). Reader reporting confidence was higher for cartilage and meniscal lesions at 3 T (each P < 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

New-generation 0.55 T knee MRI, with deep learning-aided image reconstruction, allows for reliable detection and grading of joint lesions in symptomatic patients, but it showed limited accuracy and reader confidence for low-grade cartilage and meniscal lesions in comparison with 3 T MRI.

Environmental Sustainability and MRI: Challenges, Opportunities, and a Call for Action

The environmental impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has recently come into focus. This includes its enormous demand for electricity compared to other imaging modalities and contamination of water bodies with anthropogenic gadolinium related to contrast administration. Given the pressing threat of climate change, addressing these challenges to improve the environmental sustainability of MRI is imperative. The purpose of this review is to discuss the challenges, opportunities, and the need for action to reduce the environmental impact of MRI and prepare for the effects of climate change. The approaches outlined are categorized as strategies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from MRI during production and use phases, approaches to reduce the environmental impact of MRI including the preservation of finite resources, and development of adaption plans to prepare for the impact of climate change. Co-benefits of these strategies are emphasized including lower GHG emission and reduced cost along with improved heath and patient satisfaction. Although MRI is energy-intensive, there are many steps that can be taken now to improve the environmental sustainability of MRI and prepare for the effects of climate change. On-going research, technical development, and collaboration with industry partners are needed to achieve further reductions in MRI-related GHG emissions and to decrease the reliance on finite resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.

Initial experience with a next-generation low-field MRI scanner: Potential for breast imaging?

PURPOSE

Broader clinical adoption of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) faces challenges such as limited availability and high procedural costs. Low-field technology has shown promise in addressing these challenges. We report our initial experience using a next-generation scanner for low-field breast MRI at 0.55T.

METHODS

This initial cases series was part of an institutional review board-approved prospective study using a 0.55T scanner (MAGNETOM Free.Max, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen/Germany: height < 2 m, weight < 3.2 tons, no quench pipe) equipped with a seven-channel breast coil (Noras, Höchberg/Germany). A multiparametric breast MRI protocol consisting of dynamic T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted sequences was optimized for 0.55T. Two radiologists with 12 and 20 years of experience in breast MRI evaluated the examinations.

RESULTS

Twelve participants (mean age: 55.3 years, range: 36-78 years) were examined. The image quality was diagnostic in all examinations and not impaired by relevant artifacts. Typical imaging phenotypes were visualized. The scan time for a complete, non-abbreviated breast MRI protocol ranged from 10:30 to 18:40 min.

CONCLUSION

This initial case series suggests that low-field breast MRI is feasible at diagnostic image quality within an acceptable examination time.

Go Green in Neuroradiology: towards reducing the environmental impact of its practice

Raising public awareness about the relevance of supporting sustainable practices is required owing to the phenomena of global warming caused by the rising production of greenhouse gases. The healthcare sector generates a relevant proportion of the total carbon emissions in developed countries, and radiology is estimated to be a major contributor to this carbon footprint. Neuroradiology markedly contributes to this negative environmental effect, as this radiological subspecialty generates a high proportion of diagnostic and interventional imaging procedures, the majority of them requiring high energy-intensive equipment. Therefore, neuroradiologists and neuroradiological departments are especially responsible for implementing decisions and initiatives able to reduce the unfavourable environmental effects of their activities, by focusing on four strategic pillars-reducing energy, water, and helium use; properly recycling and/or disposing of waste and residues (including contrast media); encouraging environmentally friendly behaviour; and reducing the effects of ionizing radiation on the environment. The purpose of this article is to alert neuroradiologists about their environmental responsibilities and to analyse the most productive strategic axes, goals, and lines of action that contribute to reducing the environmental impact associated with their professional activities.

Lung Nodule Detection With Modern Low-Field MRI (0.55 T) in Comparison to CT

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of modern low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for lung nodule detection and to correlate nodule size measurement with computed tomography (CT) as reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2020 and July 2021, a prospective clinical trial using low-field MRI at 0.55 T was performed in patients with known pulmonary nodules from a single academic medical center. Every patient underwent MRI and CT imaging on the same day. The primary aim was to evaluate the detection accuracy of pulmonary nodules using MRI with transversal periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction in combination with coronal half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin-echo MRI sequences. The secondary outcome was the correlation of the mean lung nodule diameter with CT as reference according to the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman rank correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis were applied to analyze the results.

RESULTS

A total of 46 participants (mean age ± SD, 66 ± 11 years; 26 women) were included. In a blinded analysis of 964 lung nodules, the detection accuracy was 100% for those ≥6 mm (126/126), 80% (159/200) for those ≥4-<6 mm, and 23% (147/638) for those <4 mm in MRI compared with reference CT. Spearman correlation coefficient of MRI and CT size measurement was r = 0.87 ( P < 0.001), and the mean difference was 0.16 ± 0.9 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Modern low-field MRI shows excellent accuracy in lesion detection for lung nodules ≥6 mm and a very strong correlation with CT imaging for size measurement, but could not compete with CT in the detection of small nodules.

MRI of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Comparative Study of 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI

OBJECTIVES

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are common and may cause persistent functional limitations and pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 and 3 T is commonly applied for the evaluation of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). No evidence is available regarding the feasibility of modern low-field MRI for the assessment of TMDs. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the image quality (IQ) of 0.55 T MRI in direct comparison with 1.5 T MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients (34 TMJs) with suspected intraarticular TMDs were enrolled, and both 0.55 and 1.5 T MRI were performed on the same day. Two senior readers independently evaluated the IQ focusing on the conspicuity of disc morphology (DM), disc position (DP), and osseous joint morphology (OJM) for each joint. We analyzed the IQ and degree of artifacts using a 4-point Likert scale (LS) at both field strengths. A fully sufficient IQ was defined as an LS score of ≥3. Nonparametric Wilcoxon test for related samples was used for statistical comparison.

RESULTS

The median IQ for the DM and OJM at 0.55 T was inferior to that at 1.5 T (DM: 3 [interquartile range {IQR}, 3-4] vs 4 [IQR, 4-4]; OJM: 3 [IQR, 3-4] vs 4 [IQR 4-4]; each P < 0.001). For DP, the IQ was comparable (4 [IQR 3-4] vs 4 [IQR 4-4]; P > 0.05). A sufficient diagnostic IQ was maintained for the DM, DP, and OJM in 92% of the cases at 0.55 T and 100% at 1.5 T. Minor image artifacts (LS score of ≥3) were more prevalent at 0.55 T (29%) than at 1.5 T (12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging of the TMJ at 0.55 T yields a lower IQ than does MRI at 1.5 T but maintains sufficient diagnostic confidence in the majority of patients. Further improvements are needed for reliable clinical application.

Low-Field-Strength Body MRI: Challenges and Opportunities at 0.55 T

Advances in MRI technology have led to the development of low-field-strength (hereafter, "low-field") (0.55 T) MRI systems with lower weight, fewer shielding requirements, and lower cost than those of traditional (1.5-3 T) systems. The trade-offs of lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 0.55 T are partially offset by patient safety and potential comfort advantages (eg, lower specific absorption rate and a more cost-effective larger bore diameter) and physical advantages (eg, decreased T2* decay, shorter T1 relaxation times). Image reconstruction advances leveraging developing technologies (such as deep learning-based denoising) can be paired with traditional techniques (such as increasing the number of signal averages) to improve SNR. The overall image quality produced by low-field MRI systems, although perhaps somewhat inferior to 1.5-3 T MRI systems in terms of SNR, is nevertheless diagnostic for a broad variety of body imaging applications. Effective low-field body MRI requires (a) an understanding of the trade-offs resulting from lower field strengths, (b) an approach to modifying routine sequences to overcome SNR challenges, and (c) a workflow for carefully selecting appropriate patients. The authors describe the rationale, opportunities, and challenges of low-field body MRI; discuss important considerations for low-field imaging with common body MRI sequences; and delineate a variety of use cases for low-field body MRI. The authors also include lessons learned from their preliminary experience with a new low-field MRI system at a tertiary care center. Finally, they explore the future of low-field MRI, summarizing current limitations and potential future developments that may enhance the clinical adoption of this technology. ©RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Venkatesh in this issue.

Feasibility of Accelerated Prostate Diffusion-Weighted Imaging on 0.55 T MRI Enabled With Random Matrix Theory Denoising

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) MRI is typically performed at high-field strength (3.0 T) in order to overcome low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In this study, we demonstrate the feasibility of prostate DWI at low field enabled by random matrix theory (RMT)-based denoising, relying on the MP-PCA algorithm applied during image reconstruction from multiple coils.

METHODS

Twenty-one volunteers and 2 prostate cancer patients were imaged with a 6-channel pelvic surface array coil and an 18-channel spine array on a prototype 0.55 T system created by ramping down a commercial magnetic resonance imaging system (1.5 T MAGNETOM Aera Siemens Healthcare) with 45 mT/m gradients and 200 T/m/s slew rate. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired with 4 non-collinear directions, for which b = 50 s/mm 2 was used with 8 averages and b = 1000 s/mm 2 with 40 averages; 2 extra b = 50 s/mm 2 were used as part of the dynamic field correction. Standard and RMT-based reconstructions were applied on DWI over different ranges of averages. Accuracy/precision was evaluated using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and image quality was evaluated over 5 separate reconstructions by 3 radiologists with a 5-point Likert scale. For the 2 patients, we compare image quality and lesion visibility of the RMT reconstruction versus the standard one on 0.55 T and on clinical 3.0 T.

RESULTS

The RMT-based reconstruction in this study reduces the noise floor by a factor of 5.8, thereby alleviating the bias on prostate ADC. Moreover, the precision of the ADC in prostate tissue after RMT increases over a range of 30%-130%, with the increase in both signal-to-noise ratio and precision being more prominent for a low number of averages. Raters found that the images were consistently of moderate to good overall quality (3-4 on the Likert scale). Moreover, they determined that b = 1000 s/mm 2 images from a 1:55-minute scan with the RMT-based reconstruction were on par with the corresponding images from a 14:20-minute scan with standard reconstruction. Prostate cancer was visible on ADC and calculated b = 1500 images even with the abbreviated 1:55-minute scan reconstructed with RMT.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate imaging using DWI is feasible at low field and can be performed more rapidly with noninferior image quality compared with standard reconstruction.

Low-field MRI: A report on the 2022 ISMRM workshop

In March 2022, the first ISMRM Workshop on Low-Field MRI was held virtually. The goals of this workshop were to discuss recent low field MRI technology including hardware and software developments, novel methodology, new contrast mechanisms, as well as the clinical translation and dissemination of these systems. The virtual Workshop was attended by 368 registrants from 24 countries, and included 34 invited talks, 100 abstract presentations, 2 panel discussions, and 2 live scanner demonstrations. Here, we report on the scientific content of the Workshop and identify the key themes that emerged. The subject matter of the Workshop reflected the ongoing developments of low-field MRI as an accessible imaging modality that may expand the usage of MRI through cost reduction, portability, and ease of installation. Many talks in this Workshop addressed the use of computational power, efficient acquisitions, and contemporary hardware to overcome the SNR limitations associated with low field strength. Participants discussed the selection of appropriate clinical applications that leverage the unique capabilities of low-field MRI within traditional radiology practices, other point-of-care settings, and the broader community. The notion of "image quality" versus "information content" was also discussed, as images from low-field portable systems that are purpose-built for clinical decision-making may not replicate the current standard of clinical imaging. Speakers also described technical challenges and infrastructure challenges related to portability and widespread dissemination, and speculated about future directions for the field to improve the technology and establish clinical value.

Comparison of vestibular schwannoma visualization between 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI

OBJECTIVES

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common mass of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and is responsible for unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 T and 3 T is the standard of care for the evaluation of VS, and the feasibility of using modern low-field MRI for imaging of the IAC has not yet been elucidated. Hence, the purpose of this prospective study was to assess image quality and diagnostic performance of a modern 0.55 T MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients with known unilateral VS underwent routine MRI of the IAC at 1.5 T, followed immediately by 0.55 T MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the image quality, conspicuity of VS, diagnostic confidence, and image artifacts separately for isotropic T2-weighted SPACE images and for transversal and coronal T1-weighted fat-saturated contrast-enhanced images at 1.5 T and 0.55 T using 5-point Likert scales. In a second independent reading, both readers assessed lesion conspicuity and subjective diagnostic confidence in a direct comparison of 1.5 T and 0.55 T images.

RESULTS

Image quality of transversal T1-weighted images (p = 0.13 and p = 0.16 for Reader 1 and Reader 2, respectively) and T2-weighted SPACE images (p = 0.39 and p = 0.58) were rated equally at 1.5 T and 0.55 T by both readers, whereas image quality of coronal T1-weighted images was superior at 1.5 T (p = 0.009 and p = 0.001). Analysis of the conspicuity of VS, diagnostic confidence, and image artifacts of all sequences revealed no significant differences between 1.5 T and 0.55 T. In the direct comparison of 1.5 T with 0.55 T images, there were no significant differences in lesion conspicuity or diagnostic confidence for any sequence (p = 0.60-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Modern low-field MRI at 0.55 T provided a sufficient diagnostic image quality and seems feasible for the evaluation of VS of the IAC.

Diagnostic Performance of 0.55 T MRI for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection

OBJECTIVES

Intracranial aneurysm (IA) is the main cause of subarachnoid hemorrhages. Time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 1.5 T or 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a well-established method for the diagnosis of IA. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the performance of a modern 0.55 T MRI in the diagnosis of IAs in comparison to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as a standard of reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with suspicion of single or multiple IAs underwent TOF MRA at 0.55 T MRI 1 day before DSA. Two neuroradiologists independently measured the aneurysm neck, width, and height on 0.55 T, 1.5 T, and 3 T 3D-TOF MRA source images and 2D/3D rotational angiography. The main analysis assessed the intermodality agreement between 0.55 T TOF MRA and DSA using Bland-Altman plots, a Wilcoxon test, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). In a secondary analysis, aneurysm dimensions were compared between 0.55 T TOF MRA and 1.5/3 T TOF MRA. Interreader agreement was evaluated by ICC. A third neuroradiologist blinded to patient history screened 0.55 T TOF MRA data sets of the aforementioned 17 patients and 15 additional healthy patients for the presence and location of aneurysms.

RESULTS

A total of 19 aneurysms in 16 patients were identified in both 0.55 T MRA and DSA. Measurements of the 2 nonblinded readers showed no significant differences between 0.55 T TOF MRA and DSA in the overall aneurysm size (calculated as the mean from height/width/neck) ( P = 0.178), as well as in the mean width ( P = 0.778) and neck values ( P = 0.190). The mean height was significantly larger in 0.55 T TOF MRA in comparison to DSA ( P = 0.020). Intermodality (1.5/3 T TOF MRA) and interrater agreement were excellent (ICC > 0.94). Of the 32 data sets of patients with and without IA, the blinded reader detected all aneurysms correctly by using 0.55 T images.

CONCLUSIONS

TOF-MRA acquired with a modern 0.55 T MRI is a reliable tool for the detection and initial assessment of IAs.

Modern Low-Field MRI of the Musculoskeletal System: Practice Considerations, Opportunities, and Challenges

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides essential information for diagnosing and treating musculoskeletal disorders. Although most musculoskeletal MRI examinations are performed at 1.5 and 3.0 T, modern low-field MRI systems offer new opportunities for affordable MRI worldwide. In 2021, a 0.55 T modern low-field, whole-body MRI system with an 80-cm-wide bore was introduced for clinical use in the United States and Europe. Compared with current higher-field-strength MRI systems, the 0.55 T MRI system has a lower total ownership cost, including purchase price, installation, and maintenance. Although signal-to-noise ratios scale with field strength, modern signal transmission and receiver chains improve signal yield compared with older low-field magnetic resonance scanner generations. Advanced radiofrequency coils permit short echo spacing and overall compacter echo trains than previously possible. Deep learning-based advanced image reconstruction algorithms provide substantial improvements in perceived signal-to-noise ratios, contrast, and spatial resolution. Musculoskeletal tissue contrast evolutions behave differently at 0.55 T, which requires careful consideration when designing pulse sequences. Similar to other field strengths, parallel imaging and simultaneous multislice acquisition techniques are vital for efficient musculoskeletal MRI acquisitions. Pliable receiver coils with a more cost-effective design offer a path to more affordable surface coils and improve image quality. Whereas fat suppression is inherently more challenging at lower field strengths, chemical shift selective fat suppression is reliable and homogeneous with modern low-field MRI technology. Dixon-based gradient echo pulse sequences provide efficient and reliable multicontrast options, including postcontrast MRI. Metal artifact reduction MRI benefits substantially from the lower field strength, including slice encoding for metal artifact correction for effective metal artifact reduction of high-susceptibility metallic implants. Wide-bore scanner designs offer exciting opportunities for interventional MRI. This review provides an overview of the economical aspects, signal and image quality considerations, technological components and coils, musculoskeletal tissue relaxation times, and image contrast of modern low-field MRI and discusses the mainstream and new applications, challenges, and opportunities of musculoskeletal MRI.

Low-field MRI: Clinical promise and challenges

Modern MRI scanners have trended toward higher field strengths to maximize signal and resolution while minimizing scan time. However, high-field devices remain expensive to install and operate, making them scarce outside of high-income countries and major population centers. Low-field strength scanners have drawn renewed academic, industry, and philanthropic interest due to advantages that could dramatically increase imaging access, including lower cost and portability. Nevertheless, low-field MRI still faces inherent limitations in image quality that come with decreased signal. In this article, we review advantages and disadvantages of low-field MRI scanners, describe hardware and software innovations that accentuate advantages and mitigate disadvantages, and consider clinical applications for a new generation of low-field devices. In our review, we explore how these devices are being or could be used for high acuity brain imaging, outpatient neuroimaging, MRI-guided procedures, pediatric imaging, and musculoskeletal imaging. Challenges for their successful clinical translation include selecting and validating appropriate use cases, integrating with standards of care in high resource settings, expanding options with actionable information in low resource settings, and facilitating health care providers and clinical practice in new ways. By embracing both the promise and challenges of low-field MRI, clinicians and researchers have an opportunity to transform medical care for patients around the world. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.

Usability of magnetic resonance images acquired at a novel low-field 0.55 T scanner for brain radiotherapy treatment planning

Background and Purpose

Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may offer specific advantages over high-field MRI, e.g. lower susceptibility-dependent distortions and simpler installation. The study aim was to evaluate if a novel 0.55 T MRI scanner provides sufficient image accuracy and quality for radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning.

Material and methods

The geometric accuracy of images acquired at a low-field MRI scanner was evaluated in phantom measurements regarding gradient non-linearity-related distortions. Patient-induced B0-susceptibility changes were investigated via B0-field-mapping in ten volunteers. Patients were positioned in RT-setup using a 3D-printed insert for the head/neck-coil that was tested for sufficient signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR). The suitability of the MRI-system for detection of metastases was evaluated in eleven patients. In comparison to diagnostic images, acquired at ≥1.5 T, three physicians evaluated the detectability of metastases by counting them in low- and high-field-images, respectively.

Results

The phantom measurements showed a high imaging fidelity after 3D-distortion-correction with (1.2 ± 0.9) mm geometric distortion in 10 cm radius from isocentre. At the edges remaining distortions were greater than at 1.5 T. The mean susceptibility-induced distortions in the head were (0.05 ± 0.05) mm and maximum 0.69 mm. SNR analysis showed that optimised positioning of RT-patients without signal loss in the head/neck-coil was possible with the RT-insert. No significant differences (p = 0.48) in detectability of metastases were found.

Conclusion

The 0.55 T MRI system provided sufficiently geometrically accurate and high-resolution images that can be used for RT-planning for brain metastases. Hence, modern low-field MRI may contribute to simply access MRI for RT-planning after further investigations.

Free-Breathing Low-Field MRI of the Lungs Detects Functional Alterations Associated With Persistent Symptoms After COVID-19 Infection

OBJECTIVES

With the COVID-19 pandemic, repetitive lung examinations have become necessary to follow-up symptoms and associated alterations. Low-field MRI, benefiting from reduced susceptibility effects, is a promising alternative for lung imaging to limit radiations absorbed by patients during CT examinations, which also have limited capability to assess functional alterations. The aim of this investigative study was to explore the functional abnormalities that free-breathing 0.55 T MRI in combination with the phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) analysis could identify in patients with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-four COVID-19 patients and 8 healthy volunteers were prospectively scanned in free-breathing with a balanced steady-state free-precession sequence optimized at 0.55 T, 5 months postinfection on average. Normalized perfusion (Q), fractional ventilation (FV), and flow-volume loop correlation (FVLc) maps were extracted with the PREFUL technique. Q, FV, and FVLc defects as well as defect overlaps between these metrics were quantified. Morphological turbo-spin-echo images were also acquired, and the extent of abnormalities was scored by a board-certified radiologist. To investigate the functional correlates of persistent symptoms, a recursive feature elimination algorithm was applied to find the most informative variables to detect the presence of persistent symptoms with a logistic regression model and a cross-validation strategy. All MRI metrics, sex, age, body mass index, and the presence of preexisting lung conditions were included.

RESULTS

The most informative variables to detect persistent symptoms were the percentage of concurrent Q and FVLc defects and of areas free of those defects. A detection accuracy of 71.4% was obtained with these 2 variables when fitting the model on the entire dataset. Although none of the single variables differed between patients with and without persistent symptoms ( P > 0.05), the combined score of these 2 variables did ( P < 0.02). This score also showed a consistent increase from healthy volunteers (7.7) to patients without persistent symptoms (8.2) and with persistent symptoms (8.6). The morphological abnormality score showed poor correlation with the functional parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional pulmonary examinations using free-breathing 0.55 T MRI with PREFUL analysis revealed potential quantitative markers of impaired lung function in patients with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection, potentially complementing morphologic imaging. Future work is needed to explore the translational relevance and clinical implication of these findings.

Radiation Dose Reduction Opportunities in Vascular Imaging

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been the gold standard imaging modality for vascular imaging due to a variety of factors, including the widespread availability of computed tomography (CT) scanners, the ease and speed of image acquisition, and the high sensitivity of CTA for vascular pathology. However, the radiation dose experienced by the patient during imaging has long been a concern of this image acquisition method. Advancements in CT image acquisition techniques in combination with advancements in non-ionizing radiation imaging techniques including magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) present growing opportunities to reduce total radiation dose to patients. This review provides an overview of advancements in imaging technology and acquisition techniques that are helping to minimize radiation dose associated with vascular imaging.

Potential of Stroke Imaging Using a New Prototype of Low-Field MRI: A Prospective Direct 0.55 T/1.5 T Scanner Comparison

Objectives: Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of mortality and acquired disability worldwide and thus plays an enormous health-economic role. Imaging of choice is computed-tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially diffusion-weighted (DW) sequences. However, MR imaging is associated with high costs and therefore has a limited availability leading to low-field-MRI techniques increasingly coming into focus. Thus, the aim of our study was to assess the potential of stroke imaging with low-field MRI. Material and Methods: A scanner comparison was performed including 27 patients (17 stroke cohort, 10 control group). For each patient, a brain scan was performed first with a 1.5T scanner and afterwards with a 0.55T scanner. Scan protocols were as identical as possible and optimized. Data analysis was performed in three steps: All DWI/ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) and FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery) sequences underwent Likert rating with respect to image impression, resolution, noise, contrast, and diagnostic quality and were evaluated by two radiologists regarding number and localization of DWI and FLAIR lesions in a blinded fashion. Then segmentation of lesion volumes was performed by two other radiologists on DWI/ADC and FLAIR. Results: DWI/ADC lesions could be diagnosed with the same reliability by the most experienced reader in the 0.55T and 1.5T sequences (specificity 100% and sensitivity 92.9%, respectively). False positive findings did not occur. Detection of number/location of FLAIR lesions was mostly equivalent between 0.55T and 1.5T sequences. No significant difference (p = 0.789−0.104) for FLAIR resolution and contrast was observed regarding Likert scaling. For DWI/ADC noise, the 0.55T sequences were significantly superior (p < 0.026). Otherwise, the 1.5T sequences were significantly superior (p < 0.029). There was no significant difference in infarct volume and volume of infarct demarcation between the 0.55T and 1.5T sequences, when detectable. Conclusions: Low-field MRI stroke imaging at 0.55T may not be inferior to scanners with higher field strengths and thus has great potential as a low-cost alternative in future stroke diagnostics. However, there are limitations in the detection of very small infarcts. Further technical developments with follow-up studies must show whether this problem can be solved.

[Imaging of the lung using low-field magnetic resonance imaging]

Hintergrund

Die Untersuchung der Lunge mit der Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) geht mit hohen Herausforderungen einher und konnte sich im klinischen Alltag bisher nicht durchsetzen. Aktuelle Entwicklungen der Niederfeld-MRT, in Kombination mit neuen computergestützten Aufnahme- und Auswertungsalgorithmen, versprechen neue Perspektiven für die bildgebende Diagnostik pulmonaler Erkrankungen.

Ziel dieser Arbeit

Diese Übersichtsarbeit soll ein Verständnis der physikalischen Vorteile der Niederfeld-MRT für die Lungenbildgebung vermitteln, einen Überblick über die spärlich vorhandenen Vorkenntnisse aus der Literatur bieten und erste Ergebnisse eines neu entwickelten Niederfeld-MRT präsentieren.

Methoden

Inhalte dieses Artikels basieren auf physikalischen Grundlagen, Recherchen in Literaturdatenbanken und eigenen Erfahrungen in der Lungenbildgebung mit einem modernen 0,55-T-MRT.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Niederfeld-MRT (< 1 T) kann technische und ökonomische Vorteile gegenüber höheren Feldstärken für die Lungenbildgebung haben. Die physikalischen Voraussetzungen sind aufgrund geringerer Suszeptibilitätseffekte, längerer transversaler Relaxationszeiten und niedrigerer spezifischer Absorptionsraten besonders für die Anatomie der Lunge vorteilhaft. Die geringeren Anschaffungs- und Betriebskosten haben zudem ein großes Potenzial, die Verfügbarkeit zu erhöhen und gleichzeitig die Nachhaltigkeit zu verbessern. Durch die Kombination moderner Sequenzen und computergestützter Auswertungen kann die morphologische Bildgebung um orts- und zeitaufgelöste funktionelle Untersuchungen der Lunge ohne Strahlenbelastung ergänzt werden. Sowohl für kritische Szenarien, wie Screening und engmaschiges Therapiemonitoring, als auch für besonders gefährdete Patientengruppen könnten Lücken geschlossen werden. Dazu gehören beispielsweise akute und chronische Lungenerkrankungen bei Kindern oder die Abklärung einer Lungenembolie bei Schwangeren.

[Imaging of the musculoskeletal system using low-field magnetic resonance imaging]

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a crucial role in musculoskeletal imaging. The high prevalence and pain-related suffering of patients pose a particular challenge concerning availability and turnover times, respectively. Low-field (≤ 1.0 T) MRI has the potential to fulfill these needs. However, during the past three decades, high field systems have increasingly replaced low field systems because of their limitations in image quality. Recent technological advancements in high-performance hard- and software promise musculoskeletal imaging with adequate quality at lower field strengths for several regions and indications.

OBJECTIVES

The goal is to provide insight into the advantages and disadvantages of low-field musculoskeletal imaging, discuss the current literature, and include our first experiences with a modern 0.55 T MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review is based on research in various literature databases and our own musculoskeletal imaging experiences with a modern 0.55 T scanner.

CONCLUSION

Most publications pertaining to musculoskeletal imaging at low-field strength MRI are outdated, and studies regarding the diagnostic performance of modern low-field MRI systems are needed. These new systems may complement existing high-field systems and make MRI more accessible, even in low-income countries. From our own experience, modern low-field MRI seems to be adequate in musculoskeletal imaging, especially in acute injuries.

The Clinical Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging According to Field Strength, Specifically Addressing the Breadth of Current State-of-the-Art Systems, Which Include 0.55 T, 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T

ABSTRACT

This review provides a balanced perspective regarding the clinical utility of magnetic resonance systems across the range of field strengths for which current state-of-the-art units exist (0.55 T, 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T). Guidance regarding this issue is critical to appropriate purchasing, usage, and further dissemination of this important imaging modality, both in the industrial world and in developing nations. The review serves to provide an important update, although to a large extent this information has never previously been openly presented. In that sense, it serves also as a position paper, with statements and recommendations as appropriate.