Preclinical Profile of Gadoquatrane: A Novel Tetrameric, Macrocyclic High Relaxivity Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent

Artificial T1-Weighted Postcontrast Brain MRI: A Deep Learning Method for Contrast Signal Extraction

OBJECTIVES

Reducing gadolinium-based contrast agents to lower costs, the environmental impact of gadolinium-containing wastewater, and patient exposure is still an unresolved issue. Published methods have never been compared. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of 2 reimplemented state-of-the-art deep learning methods (settings A and B) and a proposed method for contrast signal extraction (setting C) to synthesize artificial T1-weighted full-dose images from corresponding noncontrast and low-dose images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 213 participants received magnetic resonance imaging of the brain between August and October 2021 including low-dose (0.02 mmol/kg) and full-dose images (0.1 mmol/kg). Fifty participants were randomly set aside as test set before training (mean age ± SD, 52.6 ± 15.3 years; 30 men). Artificial and true full-dose images were compared using a reader-based study. Two readers noted all false-positive lesions and scored the overall interchangeability in regard to the clinical conclusion. Using a 5-point Likert scale (0 being the worst), they scored the contrast enhancement of each lesion and its conformity to the respective reference in the true image.

RESULTS

The average counts of false-positives per participant were 0.33 ± 0.93, 0.07 ± 0.33, and 0.05 ± 0.22 for settings A-C, respectively. Setting C showed a significantly higher proportion of scans scored as fully or mostly interchangeable (70/100) than settings A (40/100, P < 0.001) and B (57/100, P < 0.001), and generated the smallest mean enhancement reduction of scored lesions (-0.50 ± 0.55) compared with the true images (setting A: -1.10 ± 0.98; setting B: -0.91 ± 0.67, both P < 0.001). The average scores of conformity of the lesion were 1.75 ± 1.07, 2.19 ± 1.04, and 2.48 ± 0.91 for settings A-C, respectively, with significant differences among all settings (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method for contrast signal extraction showed significant improvements in synthesizing postcontrast images. A relevant proportion of images showing inadequate interchangeability with the reference remains at this dosage.

MRI contrast agents and retention in the brain: review of contemporary knowledge and recommendations to the future

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) were introduced with high expectations for favorable efficacy, low nephrotoxicity, and minimal allergic-like reactions. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and proven gadolinium retention in the body including the brain has led to the restriction of linear GBCAs and a more prudent approach regarding GBCA indication and dosing. In this review, we present the chemical, physical, and clinical aspects of this topic and aim to provide an equanimous and comprehensive summary of contemporary knowledge with a perspective of the future. In the first part of the review, we present various elements and compounds that may serve as MRI contrast agents. Several GBCAs are further discussed with consideration of their relaxivity, chelate structure, and stability. Gadolinium retention in the brain is explored including correlation with the presence of metalloprotein ferritin in the same regions where visible hyperintensity on unenhanced T1-weighted imaging occurs. Proven interaction between ferritin and gadolinium released from GBCAs is introduced and discussed, as well as the interaction of other elements with ferritin; and manganese in patients with impaired liver function or calcium in Fahr disease. We further present the concept that only high-molecular-weight forms of gadolinium can likely visibly change signal intensity on unenhanced T1-weighted imaging. Clinical data are also presented with respect to potential neurological manifestations originating from the deep-brain nuclei. Finally, new contrast agents with relatively high relaxivity and stability are introduced. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: GBCA may accumulate in the brain, especially in ferritin-rich areas; however, no adverse neurological manifestations have been detected in relation to gadolinium retention. KEY POINTS: Gadolinium currently serves as the basis for MRI contrast agents used clinically. No adverse neurological manifestations have been detected in relation to gadolinium retention. Future contrast agents must advance chelate stability and relativity, facilitating lower doses.

Relationship of Dose and Signal Enhancement Properties of Gadoquatrane, a New Tetrameric, Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent, Compared With Gadobutrol: A Randomized Crossover Study in Healthy Adults

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the signal-enhancement properties of the tetrameric gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) gadoquatrane in relation to the administered dose and compare its properties to those of a standard dose of gadobutrol, as a representative of the currently established macrocyclic GBCAs for magnetic resonance imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this randomized, single-blind, 4 × 4 crossover study, 43 healthy adults (19-50 years of age) received 3 single IV injections of gadoquatrane (0.01, 0.03, and 0.06 mmol gadolinium/kg body weight) and 1 injection of gadobutrol (0.1 mmol gadolinium/kg body weight) in randomized sequence with 1-week washout periods between administrations. The relative signal enhancement (RSE) was determined in predefined areas of interest in magnetic resonance image sets of the head-neck region. RSE-vs-dose curves (dose-response curves) were established by linear regression, and comparator-equivalent doses were determined by Bayesian inverse regression analysis. Further, 3 blood samples were taken after each injection for pharmacokinetic analyses, and safety data were assessed.

RESULTS

The RSE increased with gadoquatrane dose. A linear function adequately fitted this relationship. In line with the more than 2-fold higher r1 relaxivity of gadoquatrane per gadolinium ion, gadobutrol-equivalent RSE was achieved with gadoquatrane at less than half the gadolinium dose and less than one eighth of the molecule dose.Administration of gadoquatrane and gadobutrol resulted in very similar dose-normalized gadolinium concentrations in plasma, indicating that the pharmacokinetic profiles are essentially the same. Both contrast agents were well tolerated. Adverse events were rare and not dependent on the dose administered.

CONCLUSIONS

Gadoquatrane has the potential to be an effective GBCA that can be used at substantially lower doses in clinical routine than the currently established macrocyclic GBCAs.

Evolving Characteristics of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents for MR Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Importance of Relaxivity

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are widely and routinely used to enhance the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography examinations. T1 relaxivity (r1) is the measure of their ability to increase signal intensity in tissues and blood on T1-weighted images at a given dose. Pharmaceutical companies have invested in the design and development of GBCAs with higher and higher T1 relaxivity values, and "high relaxivity" is a claim frequently used to promote GBCAs, with no clear definition of what "high relaxivity" means, or general concurrence about its clinical benefit. To understand whether higher relaxivity values translate into a material clinical benefit, well-designed, and properly powered clinical studies are necessary, while mere in vitro measurements may be misleading. This systematic review of relevant peer-reviewed literature provides high-quality clinical evidence showing that a difference in relaxivity of at least 40% between two GBCAs results in superior diagnostic efficacy for the higher-relaxivity agent when this is used at the same equimolar gadolinium dose as the lower-relaxivity agent, or similar imaging performance when used at a lower dose. Either outcome clearly implies a relevant clinical benefit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the novel tetrameric gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent gadoquatrane in healthy Chinese and Japanese men: Two randomized dose-escalation studies including concentration-QTc modeling

PURPOSE

To investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the novel tetrameric high-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agent gadoquatrane in Japanese (Study 1) and Chinese men (Study 2).

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

In two similarly designed single-center, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, consecutive-cohort dose-escalation studies, healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to intravenous administration of gadoquatrane (0.01-0.1 mmol gadolinium/kg body weight) or placebo. Study procedures included blood sampling and collection of urine for pharmacokinetic analyses and safety assessments.

RESULTS

Twenty-five healthy Japanese men (mean age ± standard deviation: 26±5.9 years) and 23 healthy Chinese men (31±7.6 years old) were evaluated. In both studies, the pharmacokinetic profile of gadoquatrane was characterized by rapid distribution of the drug into the extracellular space and fast renal elimination. Postdose gadolinium concentrations rapidly declined with a geometric mean effective half-life of 1.3-1.4 h. The exposure increased approximately dose-proportionally with dose. The body weight-normalized volume of distribution was constant across dose levels (0.21-0.24 L/kg). Total recovery of gadolinium in urine amounted to 82-95 % (Study 1) and 96-99 % (Study 2) of the dose administered. Only a few mild, transient adverse events were reported, none of which gave rise to any safety concerns. Exploratory drug concentration-QTc modeling indicated no risk of a clinically relevant QT/QTc prolongation at the anticipated diagnostic dose.

CONCLUSION

Gadoquatrane was safe and well tolerated at all doses tested. The pharmacokinetic profile was essentially the same as that of other extracellular macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents and was consequentially also similar for Japanese and Chinese participants.

Uptake of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents by Blood Cells During Contrast-Enhanced MRI Examination

OBJECTIVES

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are routinely used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. However, there is limited knowledge about the interaction with and distribution of the drug in human cells. This lack of knowledge is surprising, given that the first interaction of the drug occurs with blood cells. Moreover, recent studies reported gadolinium (Gd) deposition within organs, such as the brain. Hence, this study is aiming to determine the uptake of GBCA in blood cells of patients undergoing contrast-enhanced MRI (ce-MRI) examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human blood was exposed to either gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) or Eu-DOTA in vitro or was collected from patients undergoing ce-MRI with Gd-DOTA. Uptake of contrast agents (CAs) by blood cells was quantified by Gd measurements using single-cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SC-ICP-MS) or, to confirm Gd-DOTA uptake, by a complementary method using Eu-DOTA by time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy, respectively.

RESULTS

Uptake of Gd-DOTA or Eu-DOTA into white blood cells (WBCs) ex vivo was detectable by SC-ICP-MS and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The intracellular concentrations were estimated to be in the range of 1-3 μM. However, no CA uptake into erythrocytes was detected with either method. In total, 42 patients between 30 and 84 years old (24 men, 18 women) were enrolled. White blood cells' uptake of Gd was measured by SC-ICP-MS. Isolated WBCs from patients who underwent ce-MRI examination showed substantial Gd uptake; however, the studied patient group showed an inhomogeneous distribution of Gd uptake. Measurements immediately after MRI examination indicated 21-444 attogram/WBC, corresponding to an intracellular Gd concentration in the range from 0.2 to 5.5 μM.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the ex vivo uptake of GBCA by WBCs and provides the first evidence that GBCA is indeed taken up by WBCs in vivo by patients undergoing ce-MRI examination. However, the observed Gd uptake in WBCs does not follow a log-normal distribution commonly observed in the fields of environmental studies, biology, and medicine. Whether cellular uptake of GBCA is linked to the observed deposition of Gd remains unclear. Therefore, studying the interaction between GBCA and human cells may clarify crucial questions about the effects of Gd on patients after MRI examinations.

Contrast Media-driven Anthropogenic Gadolinium: Knowns and Unknowns

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have augmented the capabilities of MRI, which has led to their widespread and increasing use in radiology practice. GBCAs are introduced into the environment through disposal of unused product and elimination after intravenous injection, both primarily via liquid dispersion into the environment. This human introduction of gadolinium into the environment, referred to as anthropogenic gadolinium, is associated with the detection of gadolinium in water systems, raising concerns for potential adverse impact and prompting certain mitigation actions. This article summarizes the existing knowledge and problem scope, conveys the relevant underlying chemical principles of chelate dissociation, and offers an inferred perspective that the magnitude of the problem is most unlikely to cause human harm. The merits and limitations regarding possible mitigation tactics, such as collecting urine after GBCA administration, use of lower-dose high-relaxivity macrocyclic GBCAs, and the option for virtual contrast-enhanced examinations, will be discussed. Finally, the potential for monitoring gadolinium uptake in bone will be presented, and recommendations for future research will be offered. © RSNA, 2024 See also the article by Ibrahim et al in this issue. See also the article by McKee et al in this issue.

α-Aryl substituted GdDOTA derivatives, the perfect contrast agents for MRI?

Enhancing the performance of Gd3+ chelates as relaxation agents for MRI has the potential to lower doses, improving safety and mitigating the environmental impact on our surface waters. More than three decades of research into manipulating the properties of Gd3+ have failed to develop a chelate that simultaneously optimizes all relevant parameters and affords maximal relaxivity. Introducing aryl substituents into the α-position of the pendant arms of a GdDOTA chelate affords chelates that, for the first time, simultaneously optimize all physico-chemical properties. Slowing tumbling by binding to human serum albumin affords a relaxivity of 110 ± 5 mM-1 s-1, close to the maximum possible. As discrete chelates, these α-aryl substituted GdDOTA chelates exhibit relaxivities that are 2-3 times higher than those of currently used agents, even at the higher fields (1.5 & 3.0 T) used in modern clinical MRI.

Review of strategies to reduce the contamination of the water environment by gadolinium-based contrast agents

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) are essential for diagnostic MRI examinations. GBCA are only used in small quantities on a per-patient basis; however, the acquisition of contrast-enhanced MRI examinations worldwide results in the use of many thousands of litres of GBCA per year. Data shows that these GBCA are present in sewage water, surface water, and drinking water in many regions of the world. Therefore, there is growing concern regarding the environmental impact of GBCA because of their ubiquitous presence in the aquatic environment. To address the problem of GBCA in the water system as a whole, collaboration is necessary between all stakeholders, including the producers of GBCA, medical professionals and importantly, the consumers of drinking water, i.e. the patients. This paper aims to make healthcare professionals aware of the opportunity to take the lead in making informed decisions about the use of GBCA and provides an overview of the different options for action.In this paper, we first provide a summary on the metabolism and clinical use of GBCA, then the environmental fate and observations of GBCA, followed by measures to reduce the use of GBCA. The environmental impact of GBCA can be reduced by (1) measures focusing on the application of GBCA by means of weight-based contrast volume reduction, GBCA with higher relaxivity per mmol of Gd, contrast-enhancing sequences, and post-processing; and (2) measures that reduce the waste of GBCA, including the use of bulk packaging and collecting residues of GBCA at the point of application.Critical relevance statement This review aims to make healthcare professionals aware of the environmental impact of GBCA and the opportunity for them to take the lead in making informed decisions about GBCA use and the different options to reduce its environmental burden.Key points• Gadolinium-based contrast agents are found in sources of drinking water and constitute an environmental risk.• Radiologists have a wide spectrum of options to reduce GBCA use without compromising diagnostic quality.• Radiology can become more sustainable by adopting such measures in clinical practice.

Protein MRI Contrast Agents as an Effective Approach for Precision Molecular Imaging

ABSTRACT

Cancer and other acute and chronic diseases are results of perturbations of common molecular determinants in key biological and signaling processes. Imaging is critical for characterizing dynamic changes in tumors and metastases, the tumor microenvironment, tumor-stroma interactions, and drug targets, at multiscale levels. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged to be a primary imaging modality for both clinical and preclinical applications due to its advantages over other modalities, including sensitivity to soft tissues, nondepth limitations, and the use of nonionizing radiation. However, extending the application of MRI to achieve both qualitative and quantitative precise molecular imaging with the capability to quantify molecular biomarkers for early detection, staging, and monitoring therapeutic treatment requires the capacity to overcome several major challenges including the trade-off between metal-binding affinity and relaxivity, which is an issue frequently associated with small chelator contrast agents. In this review, we will introduce the criteria of ideal contrast agents for precision molecular imaging and discuss the relaxivity of current contrast agents with defined first shell coordination water molecules. We will then report our advances in creating a new class of protein-targeted MRI contrast agents (ProCAs) with contributions to relaxivity largely derived from the secondary sphere and correlation time. We will summarize our rationale, design strategy, and approaches to the development and optimization of our pioneering ProCAs with desired high relaxivity, metal stability, and molecular biomarker-targeting capability, for precision MRI. From first generation (ProCA1) to third generation (ProCA32), we have achieved dual high r1 and r2 values that are 6- to 10-fold higher than clinically approved contrast agents at magnetic fields of 1.5 T, and their relaxivity values at high field are also significantly higher, which enables high resolution during small animal imaging. Further engineering of multiple targeting moieties enables ProCA32 agents that have strong biomarker-binding affinity and specificity for an array of key molecular biomarkers associated with various chronic diseases, while maintaining relaxation and exceptional metal-binding and selectivity, serum stability, and resistance to transmetallation, which are critical in mitigating risks associated with metal toxicity. Our leading product ProCA32.collagen has enabled the first early detection of liver metastasis from multiple cancers at early stages by mapping the tumor environment and early stage of fibrosis from liver and lung in vivo, with strong translational potential to extend to precision MRI for preclinical and clinical applications for precision diagnosis and treatment.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of the Novel Tetrameric, High-Relaxivity, Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Gadoquatrane in Healthy Adults

OBJECTIVES

Gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents are well established in clinical routine and have been proven safe and effective. However, there is a need for "next-generation" Gd-based contrast agents that would allow lowering the Gd dose used for routine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging procedures. The objective of this first-in-human study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and tolerability of gadoquatrane, a novel high-relaxivity Gd-based contrast agent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in 2018/2019 as a prospective, randomized, single-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled, escalating-dose study. Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned (6:2) to intravenous administration of gadoquatrane (0.025 to 0.2 mmol Gd/kg body weight) or placebo. Study procedures included collection of blood samples and excreta for pharmacokinetic analyses and safety assessments.

RESULTS

Forty-nine healthy study participants (mean age ± SD, 35 ± 6.3 years; 24 female) were evaluated. The effective half-life of gadoquatrane in plasma was short and similar in all dose groups (1.4-1.7 hours). Plasma concentrations around the lower quantitation limit (0.0318 μmol Gd/L) were reached 15-72 hours after administration. The volume of distribution at steady state was ~0.2 L/kg in all dose groups. The clearance (total and renal) was ~0.1 L/h per kilogram in all groups. Across dose groups, the exposure of gadoquatrane increased dose-proportionally. Metabolite profiling revealed no hint of degradation in vivo or release of free Gd. Seven of 36 participants (19.4%) receiving gadoquatrane and 4 of 13 participants (30.8%) receiving placebo experienced mild or moderate treatment-emergent adverse events. No serious adverse events occurred. The analysis of the Gd concentration-QTc interval relationship indicated no risk of QT/QTc prolongation (>10 milliseconds) with gadoquatrane at clinical dose levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Gadoquatrane with its high-relaxivity, pharmacokinetic similarity to established Gd-based contrast agents and high tolerability is a promising "next-generation" contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging.

A New Era in Magnetic Resonance Contrast Media

ABSTRACT

Next-generation gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), including both high relaxivity agents and targeted agents, and manganese-based agents with a high probably of commercial success are discussed in some depth. It is highly likely that gadopiclenol and gadoquatrane, both next-generation high relaxivity gadolinium-based compounds, will come in time to replace the current macrocyclic gadolinium chelates, despite the wide acceptance, very high safety profile, and high stability of the latter group. Current research has also made possible the development of 2 new targeted gadolinium chelates, which look very promising, with the potential to improve cancer detection (for both MT218 and ProCA32.collagen) as well as diseases of collagen (for the latter agent). Further work with manganese-based compounds, a topic left fallow for more than 20 years, has also now produced 2 agents with high potential for clinical use, one (manganese chloride tetrahydrate, administered orally) developed primarily for imaging of the liver and the other (Mn-PyC3A, administered intravenously) as a gadolinium-free replacement for the GBCAs. New detail has recently emerged regarding specific circumscribed subregions of the brain with specialized cytoarchitecture and functions in which high gadolinium concentrations are seen following injection of the linear agent gadodiamide. These findings pave the way for tailored functional neurological testing, specifically in patients at potential risk due to the continued wide use in many countries across the world of the linear GBCAs. The impact of artificial intelligence is also critically discussed, with its most likely applications being dose reduction and new clinical indications.

The role of gadolinium-based contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging structured reporting and data systems (RADS)

Among the 28 reporting and data systems (RADS) available in the literature, we identified 15 RADS that can be used in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Performing examinations without using gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) has benefits, but GBCA administration is often required to achieve an early and accurate diagnosis. The aim of the present review is to summarize the current role of GBCA in MRI RADS. This overview suggests that GBCA are today required in most of the current RADS and are expected to be used in most MRIs performed in patients with cancer. Dynamic contrast enhancement is required for correct scores calculation in PI-RADS and VI-RADS, although scientific evidence may lead in the future to avoid the GBCA administration in these two RADS. In Bone-RADS, contrast enhancement can be required to classify an aggressive lesion. In RADS scoring on whole body-MRI datasets (MET-RADS-P, MY-RADS and ONCO-RADS), in NS-RADS and in Node-RADS, GBCA administration is optional thanks to the intrinsic high contrast resolution of MRI. Future studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the high T1 relaxivity GBCA on the assignment of RADS scores.

MRI Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media: Meeting Radiological, Clinical, and Environmental Needs

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are routinely used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). They are essential for choosing the most appropriate medical or surgical strategy for patients with serious pathologies, particularly in oncologic, inflammatory, and cardiovascular diseases. However, GBCAs have been associated with an increased risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal failure, as well as the possibility of deposition in the brain, bones, and other organs, even in patients with normal renal function. Research is underway to reduce the quantity of gadolinium injected, without compromising image quality and diagnosis. The next generation of GBCAs will enable a reduction in the gadolinium dose administered. Gadopiclenol is the first of this new generation of GBCAs, with high relaxivity, thus having the potential to reduce the gadolinium dose while maintaining good in vivo stability due to its macrocyclic structure. High-stability and high-relaxivity GBCAs will be one of the solutions for reducing the dose of gadolinium to be administered in clinical practice, while the development of new technologies, including optimization of MRI acquisitions, new contrast mechanisms, and artificial intelligence may help reduce the need for GBCAs. Future solutions may involve a combination of next-generation GBCAs and image-processing techniques to optimize diagnosis and treatment planning while minimizing exposure to gadolinium. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Gadolinium contrast agents- challenges and opportunities of a multidisciplinary approach: Literature review

Contrast agents is used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve the visibility of the details of the organ structures. Gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) has been used since 1988 in MRI for diagnostic and follow-up of patients, the gadolinium good properties make it an effective choice for enhance the signal in MRI by increase its intensity and shortening the relaxation time of the proton. Recently, many studies show a gadolinium deposition in different human organs due to release of free gadolinium various body organs or tissue, which led to increased concern about the use of gadolinium agents, in this study, the potential diseases that may affect the patient and side effects that appear on the patient and related to accumulation of gadolinium were clarified, the study focused on the organs such as brain and bones in which gadolinium deposition was found and the lesions associated with it, and the diseases associated with gadolinium retention includes Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) and Gadolinium deposition disease (GDD). Some studies tended to improve the contrast agents by developing a new non-gadolinium agents or development of next-generation gadolinium agents. In this review article the latest knowledge about MRI contrast agent.

Coating influence on inner shell water exchange: An underinvestigated major contributor to SPIONs relaxation properties

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are heavily studied as potential MRI contrast enhancing agents. Every year, novel coatings are reported which yield large increases in relaxivity compared to similar particles. However, the reason for the increased performance is not always well understood mechanistically. In this review, we attempt to relate these advances back to fundamental models of relaxivity, developed for chelated metal ions, primarily gadolinium. We focus most closely on the three-shell model which considers the relaxation of surface-bound, entrained, and bulk water molecules as three distinct contributions to total relaxation. Because SPIONs are larger, more complex, and entrain significantly more water than gadolinium-based contrast agents, we consider how to adapt the application of classical models to SPIONs in a predictive manner. By carefully considering models and previous results, a qualitative model of entrained water interactions emerges, based primarily on the contributions of core size, coating thickness, density, and hydrophilicity.

Update on Gadolinium Based Contrast Agent Safety, From the AJR Special Series on Contrast Media

Since its introduction 35 years ago, gadolinium-enhanced MRI has fundamentally changed medical practice. While extraordinarily safe, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) may have side effects. Four distinct safety considerations include: acute allergic-like reactions, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), gadolinium deposition, and symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure. Acute reactions after GBCA administration are uncommon-far less than with iodinated contrast agents-and, while rare, serious reactions can occur. NSF is a rare, but serious, scleroderma-like condition occurring in patients with kidney failure after exposure to American College of Radiology (ACR) Group 1 GBCAs. Group 2 and 3 GBCAs are considered lower risk, and, through their use, NSF has largely been eliminated. Unrelated to NSF, retention of trace amounts of gadolinium in the brain and other organs has been recognized for over a decade. Deposition occurs with all agents, although linear agents appear to deposit more than macrocyclic agents. Importantly, to date, no data demonstrate any adverse biologic or clinical effects from gadolinium deposition, even with normal kidney function. This article summarizes the latest safety evidence of commercially available GBCAs with a focus on new agents, discusses updates to the ACR NSF GBCA safety classification, and describes approaches for strengthening the evidence needed for regulatory decisions.

Bi-HPDO3A as a novel contrast agent for X-ray computed tomography

A new bismuth-based CT agent was synthesized through a facile synthesis strategy. The in vitro stability, toxicity and CT performance were evaluated. The in vivo imaging performance was investigated using three different doses (0.5, 1.2 and 5 mmol/kg) and the result obtained at 1.2 mmol/kg was compared with the clinically approved CT agent iopamidol at the same dosage.

Artificial Contrast: Deep Learning for Reducing Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Neuroradiology

ABSTRACT

Deep learning approaches are playing an ever-increasing role throughout diagnostic medicine, especially in neuroradiology, to solve a wide range of problems such as segmentation, synthesis of missing sequences, and image quality improvement. Of particular interest is their application in the reduction of gadolinium-based contrast agents, the administration of which has been under cautious reevaluation in recent years because of concerns about gadolinium deposition and its unclear long-term consequences. A growing number of studies are investigating the reduction (low-dose approach) or even complete substitution (zero-dose approach) of gadolinium-based contrast agents in diverse patient populations using a variety of deep learning methods. This work aims to highlight selected research and discusses the advantages and limitations of recent deep learning approaches, the challenges of assessing its output, and the progress toward clinical applicability distinguishing between the low-dose and zero-dose approach.

Reduction of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in MRI Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Different Input Protocols: Limited Interchangeability of Synthesized Sequences With Original Full-Dose Images Despite Excellent Quantitative Performance

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to implement a state-of-the-art convolutional neural network used to synthesize artificial T1-weighted (T1w) full-dose images from corresponding noncontrast and low-dose images (using various settings of input sequences) and test its performance on a patient population acquired prospectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this monocentric, institutional review board-approved study, a total of 138 participants were included who received an adapted imaging protocol with acquisition of a T1w low dose after administration of 10% of the standard dose and acquisition of a T1w full dose after administration of the remaining 90% of the standard dose of a gadolinium-containing contrast agent. A total of 83 participants formed the training sample (51.7 ± 16.5 years, 36 women), 25 the validation sample (55.3 ± 16.4 years, 11 women), and 30 the test sample (55.0 ± 15.0 years, 9 women). Four input settings were differentiated: only the T1w noncontrast and T1w low-dose images (standard setting), only the T1w noncontrast and T1w low-dose images with a prolonged postinjection time of 5 minutes (5-minute setting), multiple noncontrast sequences (T1w, T2w, diffusion) and the T1w low-dose images (extended setting), and only noncontrast sequences (T1w, T2w, diffusion) were used (zero-dose setting). For each setting, a deep neural network was trained to synthesize artificial T1w full-dose images, which were assessed on the test sample using an objective evaluation based on quantitative metrics and a subjective evaluation through a reader-based study. Three readers scored the overall image quality, the interchangeability in regard to the clinical conclusion compared with the true T1w full-dose sequence, the contrast enhancement of lesions, and their conformity to the respective references in the true T1w full dose.

RESULTS

Quantitative analysis of the artificial T1w full-dose images of the standard setting provided a peak signal-to-noise ratio of 33.39 ± 0.62 (corresponding to an average improvement of the low-dose sequences of 5.2 dB) and a structural similarity index measure of 0.938 ± 0.005. In the 4-fold cross-validation, the extended setting yielded similar performance to the standard setting in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio ( P = 0.20), but a slight improvement in structural similarity index measure ( P < 0.0001). For all settings, the reader study found comparable overall image quality between the original and artificial T1w full-dose images. The proportion of scans scored as fully or mostly interchangeable was 55%, 58%, 43%, and 3% and the average counts of false positives per case were 0.42 ± 0.83, 0.34 ± 0.71, 0.82 ± 1.15, and 2.00 ± 1.07 for the standard, 5-minute, extended, and zero-dose setting, respectively. Using a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4, 0 being the worst), all settings of synthesized full-dose images showed significantly poorer contrast enhancement of lesions compared with the original full-dose sequence (difference of average degree of contrast enhancement-standard: -0.97 ± 0.83, P = <0.001; 5-minute: -0.93 ± 0.91, P = <0.001; extended: -0.96 ± 0.97, P = <0.001; zero-dose: -2.39 ± 1.14, P = <0.001). The average scores of conformity of the lesions compared with the original full-dose sequence were 2.25 ± 1.21, 2.22 ± 1.27, 2.24 ± 1.25, and 0.73 ± 0.93 for the standard, 5-minute, extended, and zero-dose setting, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The tested deep learning algorithm for synthesis of artificial T1w full-dose sequences based on images after administration of only 10% of the standard dose of a gadolinium-based contrast agent showed very good quantitative performance. Despite good image quality in all settings, both false-negative and false-positive signals resulted in significantly limited interchangeability of the synthesized sequences with the original full-dose sequences.