Efficacy and Safety of Gadopiclenol for Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Central Nervous System: The PICTURE Randomized Clinical Trial

Reducing Gadolinium Contrast With Artificial Intelligence

Gadolinium contrast is an important agent in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), particularly in neuroimaging where it can help identify blood-brain barrier breakdown from an inflammatory, infectious, or neoplastic process. However, gadolinium contrast has several drawbacks, including nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, gadolinium deposition in the brain and bones, and allergic-like reactions. As computer hardware and technology continues to evolve, machine learning has become a possible solution for eliminating or reducing the dose of gadolinium contrast. This review summarizes the clinical uses of gadolinium contrast, the risks of gadolinium contrast, and state-of-the-art machine learning methods that have been applied to reduce or eliminate gadolinium contrast administration, as well as their current limitations, with a focus on neuroimaging applications. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Evaluation of the Contrast Enhancement Performance of Gadopiclenol for Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Healthy Rabbits and Pigs

OBJECTIVES

Unexpected accumulations of gadolinium in various organs were reported after the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents, making desirable to reduce the dose while maintaining equivalent diagnostic performance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contrast enhancement performance of high relaxivity gadopiclenol compared with gadoterate meglumine in abdominal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a first study in healthy rabbits, axial 3D gradient echo sequences were applied at 4.7 T to study arterial enhancement as a function of gadopiclenol dose (0.025, 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 mmol Gd/kg) or gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg (n = 5-6/group). The increase in signal-to-noise ratio (ΔSNR) in the aorta at the first pass was measured and compared. In a second, crossover study in 6 healthy pigs, abdominal CE-MRA sequences were acquired at 3 T with gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol Gd/kg or gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg at a 1-week interval. Quantitatively on the maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, the mean MIP SNR within the aorta of both groups was compared. Qualitatively, a blinded comparison of the angiograms was performed by an experienced radiologist to determine the preferred contrast agent.

RESULTS

In the rabbit, ∆SNR is linearly correlated with the gadopiclenol dose ( P = 0.0010). Compared with gadoterate meglumine 0.1 mmol Gd/kg, an increase in the ∆SNR is observed after 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 mmol Gd/kg of gadopiclenol (+63% P = 0.0731, +78% P = 0.0081, and +72% P = 0.0773, respectively), whereas at 0.025 mmol Gd/kg, ∆SNR is in the same range as with gadoterate meglumine 0.1 mmol Gd/kg (+15% P > 0.9999). In pigs, contrast enhancement after gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg is +22% superior to MIP SNR after gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg ( P = 0.3095). Qualitatively, a preference was shown for gadopiclenol images (3/6) over the gadoterate meglumine examinations (1/6), with no preference being shown for the remainder (2/6).

CONCLUSIONS

First-pass CE-MRA is feasible with gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol Gd/kg with at least the same arterial signal enhancement and image quality as gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg.

MRI contrast agents and retention in the brain: review of contemporary knowledge and recommendations to the future

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) were introduced with high expectations for favorable efficacy, low nephrotoxicity, and minimal allergic-like reactions. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and proven gadolinium retention in the body including the brain has led to the restriction of linear GBCAs and a more prudent approach regarding GBCA indication and dosing. In this review, we present the chemical, physical, and clinical aspects of this topic and aim to provide an equanimous and comprehensive summary of contemporary knowledge with a perspective of the future. In the first part of the review, we present various elements and compounds that may serve as MRI contrast agents. Several GBCAs are further discussed with consideration of their relaxivity, chelate structure, and stability. Gadolinium retention in the brain is explored including correlation with the presence of metalloprotein ferritin in the same regions where visible hyperintensity on unenhanced T1-weighted imaging occurs. Proven interaction between ferritin and gadolinium released from GBCAs is introduced and discussed, as well as the interaction of other elements with ferritin; and manganese in patients with impaired liver function or calcium in Fahr disease. We further present the concept that only high-molecular-weight forms of gadolinium can likely visibly change signal intensity on unenhanced T1-weighted imaging. Clinical data are also presented with respect to potential neurological manifestations originating from the deep-brain nuclei. Finally, new contrast agents with relatively high relaxivity and stability are introduced. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: GBCA may accumulate in the brain, especially in ferritin-rich areas; however, no adverse neurological manifestations have been detected in relation to gadolinium retention. KEY POINTS: Gadolinium currently serves as the basis for MRI contrast agents used clinically. No adverse neurological manifestations have been detected in relation to gadolinium retention. Future contrast agents must advance chelate stability and relativity, facilitating lower doses.

Sex distribution in clinical trials of radiologic contrast agents: A 27-year review

PURPOSE

Clinical trials play a pivotal role in assessing the safety and efficacy of medical therapies. Addressing sex distribution among enrollees in clinical trials of radiologic contrast agents is essential for ensuring the generalizability of trial outcomes. Previous research has highlighted the influence of demographic factors, particularly sex, on treatment responses, emphasizing the need for equitable representation in clinical trials. Our study aim was to determine the sex distribution of enrollees in clinical trials of radiologic contrast agents.

METHODS

Our retrospective study included a total of 65 clinical trials conducted between 1990 and 2017 identified on clinicaltrials.gov after a comprehensive review including searching individually for all FDA approved contrast agents. Data collected included the year of FDA approval, the number of participants, sex distribution, trial location, trial phase, and study type. Inter-rater validation ensured data accuracy.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed fluctuations in sex distribution of trial enrollees. Enrollment of males exceeded females in most years, with a shift towards a more equitable representation in recent trials. Trials conducted in the United States had a higher rate of enrollment by females. Phase I trials had the most balanced representation, whereas Phase IV trials had the highest sex disparity.

CONCLUSION

Across all trials, females made up 47.3 % of enrollees [3316 out of 7016 total enrollees]. Enrollment of males exceeded females in 44 of the 65 trials studied, females outnumbered males in 19 trials, and enrollment was equal between the sexes in 2 trials. While the sex distribution observed across all trials represents an equitable representation of enrollees, the wide variance of sex distribution at the level of individual trials has the potential to limit the generalizability of results.

Chiral Pyclen-Based Heptadentate Chelates as Highly Stable MRI Contrast Agents

In recent years, pyclen-based complexes have attracted a great deal of interest as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents (CAs) and luminescent materials, as well as radiopharmaceuticals. Remarkably, gadopiclenol, a Gd(III) bishydrated complex featuring a pyclen-based heptadentate ligand, received approval as a novel contrast agent for clinical MRI application in 2022. To maximize stability and efficiency, two novel chiral pyclen-based chelators and their complexes were developed in this study. Gd-X-PCTA-2 showed significant enhancements in both thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities compared to those of the achiral parent derivative Gd-PCTA. 1H NMRD profiles reveal that both chiral gadolinium complexes (Gd-X-PCTA-1 and Gd-X-PCTA-2) have a higher relaxivity than Gd-PCTA, while variable-temperature 17O NMR studies show that the two inner-sphere water molecules have distinct residence times τMa and τMb. Furthermore, in vivo imaging demonstrates that Gd-X-PCTA-2 enhances the signal in the heart and kidneys of the mice, and the chiral Gd complexes exhibit the ability to distinguish between tumors and normal tissues in a 4T1 mouse model more efficiently than that of the clinical agent gadobutrol. Biodistribution studies show that Gd-PCTA and Gd-X-PCTA-2 are primarily cleared by a renal pathway, with 24 h residues of Gd-X-PCTA-2 in the liver and kidney being lower than those of Gd-PCTA.

Evolving Characteristics of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents for MR Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Importance of Relaxivity

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are widely and routinely used to enhance the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography examinations. T1 relaxivity (r1) is the measure of their ability to increase signal intensity in tissues and blood on T1-weighted images at a given dose. Pharmaceutical companies have invested in the design and development of GBCAs with higher and higher T1 relaxivity values, and "high relaxivity" is a claim frequently used to promote GBCAs, with no clear definition of what "high relaxivity" means, or general concurrence about its clinical benefit. To understand whether higher relaxivity values translate into a material clinical benefit, well-designed, and properly powered clinical studies are necessary, while mere in vitro measurements may be misleading. This systematic review of relevant peer-reviewed literature provides high-quality clinical evidence showing that a difference in relaxivity of at least 40% between two GBCAs results in superior diagnostic efficacy for the higher-relaxivity agent when this is used at the same equimolar gadolinium dose as the lower-relaxivity agent, or similar imaging performance when used at a lower dose. Either outcome clearly implies a relevant clinical benefit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Uptake of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents by Blood Cells During Contrast-Enhanced MRI Examination

OBJECTIVES

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are routinely used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. However, there is limited knowledge about the interaction with and distribution of the drug in human cells. This lack of knowledge is surprising, given that the first interaction of the drug occurs with blood cells. Moreover, recent studies reported gadolinium (Gd) deposition within organs, such as the brain. Hence, this study is aiming to determine the uptake of GBCA in blood cells of patients undergoing contrast-enhanced MRI (ce-MRI) examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human blood was exposed to either gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) or Eu-DOTA in vitro or was collected from patients undergoing ce-MRI with Gd-DOTA. Uptake of contrast agents (CAs) by blood cells was quantified by Gd measurements using single-cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SC-ICP-MS) or, to confirm Gd-DOTA uptake, by a complementary method using Eu-DOTA by time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy, respectively.

RESULTS

Uptake of Gd-DOTA or Eu-DOTA into white blood cells (WBCs) ex vivo was detectable by SC-ICP-MS and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The intracellular concentrations were estimated to be in the range of 1-3 μM. However, no CA uptake into erythrocytes was detected with either method. In total, 42 patients between 30 and 84 years old (24 men, 18 women) were enrolled. White blood cells' uptake of Gd was measured by SC-ICP-MS. Isolated WBCs from patients who underwent ce-MRI examination showed substantial Gd uptake; however, the studied patient group showed an inhomogeneous distribution of Gd uptake. Measurements immediately after MRI examination indicated 21-444 attogram/WBC, corresponding to an intracellular Gd concentration in the range from 0.2 to 5.5 μM.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the ex vivo uptake of GBCA by WBCs and provides the first evidence that GBCA is indeed taken up by WBCs in vivo by patients undergoing ce-MRI examination. However, the observed Gd uptake in WBCs does not follow a log-normal distribution commonly observed in the fields of environmental studies, biology, and medicine. Whether cellular uptake of GBCA is linked to the observed deposition of Gd remains unclear. Therefore, studying the interaction between GBCA and human cells may clarify crucial questions about the effects of Gd on patients after MRI examinations.

Safe and Informed Use of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent in Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Where We Were and Where We Are

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have helped to improve the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. There are currently nine different commercially available gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) that can be used for body MRI cases, and which are classifiable according to their structures (cyclic or linear) or biodistribution (extracellular-space agents, target/specific-agents, and blood-pool agents). The aim of this review is to illustrate the commercially available MRI contrast agents, their effect on imaging, and adverse reaction on the body, with the goal to lead to their proper selection in different clinical contexts. When we have to choose between the different GBCAs, we have to consider several factors: (1) safety and clinical impact; (2) biodistribution and diagnostic application; (3) higher relaxivity and better lesion detection; (4) higher stability and lower tissue deposit; (5) gadolinium dose/concentration and lower volume injection; (6) pulse sequences and protocol optimization; (7) higher contrast-to-noise ratio at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T. Knowing the patient's clinical information, the relevant GBCAs properties and their effect on body MRI sequences are the key features to perform efficient and high-quality MRI examination.

Planetary Health and Radiology: Why We Should Care and What We Can Do

Climate change adversely affects the well-being of humans and the entire planet. A planetary health framework recognizes that sustaining a healthy planet is essential to achieving individual, community, and global health. Radiology contributes to the climate crisis by generating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during the production and use of medical imaging equipment and supplies. To promote planetary health, strategies that mitigate and adapt to climate change in radiology are needed. Mitigation strategies to reduce GHG emissions include switching to renewable energy sources, refurbishing rather than replacing imaging scanners, and powering down unused scanners. Radiology departments must also build resiliency to the now unavoidable impacts of the climate crisis. Adaptation strategies include education, upgrading building infrastructure, and developing departmental sustainability dashboards to track progress in achieving sustainability goals. Shifting practices to catalyze these necessary changes in radiology requires a coordinated approach. This includes partnering with key stakeholders, providing effective communication, and prioritizing high-impact interventions. This article reviews the intersection of planetary health and radiology. Its goals are to emphasize why we should care about sustainability, showcase actions we can take to mitigate our impact, and prepare us to adapt to the effects of climate change. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the article by Ibrahim et al in this issue. See also the article by Lenkinski and Rofsky in this issue.

Go Green in Neuroradiology: towards reducing the environmental impact of its practice

Raising public awareness about the relevance of supporting sustainable practices is required owing to the phenomena of global warming caused by the rising production of greenhouse gases. The healthcare sector generates a relevant proportion of the total carbon emissions in developed countries, and radiology is estimated to be a major contributor to this carbon footprint. Neuroradiology markedly contributes to this negative environmental effect, as this radiological subspecialty generates a high proportion of diagnostic and interventional imaging procedures, the majority of them requiring high energy-intensive equipment. Therefore, neuroradiologists and neuroradiological departments are especially responsible for implementing decisions and initiatives able to reduce the unfavourable environmental effects of their activities, by focusing on four strategic pillars-reducing energy, water, and helium use; properly recycling and/or disposing of waste and residues (including contrast media); encouraging environmentally friendly behaviour; and reducing the effects of ionizing radiation on the environment. The purpose of this article is to alert neuroradiologists about their environmental responsibilities and to analyse the most productive strategic axes, goals, and lines of action that contribute to reducing the environmental impact associated with their professional activities.

Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents in multiple sclerosis: a review by the ESMRMB-GREC and ESNR Multiple Sclerosis Working Group

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive technique for detecting inflammatory demyelinating lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) and plays a crucial role in diagnosis and monitoring treatment effectiveness, and for predicting the disease course. In clinical practice, detection of MS lesions is mainly based on T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences. Contrast-enhancing lesions (CEL) on T1-weighted sequences are related to (sub)acute inflammation, while new or enlarging T2 lesions reflect the permanent footprint from a previous acute inflammatory demyelinating event. These two types of MRI features provide redundant information, at least in regular monitoring of the disease. Due to the concern of gadolinium deposition after repetitive injections of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), scientific organizations and regulatory agencies in Europe and North America have proposed that these contrast agents should be administered only if clinically necessary. In this article, we provide data on the mode of action of GBCAs in MS, the indications of the use of these agents in clinical practice, their value in MS for diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring purposes, and their use in specific populations (children, pregnant women, and breast-feeders). We discuss imaging strategies that achieve the highest sensitivity for detecting CELs in compliance with the safety regulations established by different regulatory agencies. Finally, we will briefly discuss some alternatives to the use of GBCA for detecting blood-brain barrier disruption in MS lesions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Although use of GBCA at diagnostic workup of suspected MS is highly valuable for diagnostic and prognostic purposes, their use in routine monitoring is not mandatory and must be reduced, as detection of disease activity can be based on the identification of new or enlarging lesions on T2-weighted images. KEY POINTS: • Both the EMA and the FDA state that the use of GBCA in medicine should be restricted to clinical scenarios in which the additional information offered by the contrast agent is required. • The use of GBCA is generally recommended in the diagnostic workup in subjects with suspected MS and is generally not necessary for routine monitoring in clinical practice. • Alternative MRI-based approaches for detecting acute focal inflammatory MS lesions are not yet ready to be used in clinical practice.

Review of strategies to reduce the contamination of the water environment by gadolinium-based contrast agents

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) are essential for diagnostic MRI examinations. GBCA are only used in small quantities on a per-patient basis; however, the acquisition of contrast-enhanced MRI examinations worldwide results in the use of many thousands of litres of GBCA per year. Data shows that these GBCA are present in sewage water, surface water, and drinking water in many regions of the world. Therefore, there is growing concern regarding the environmental impact of GBCA because of their ubiquitous presence in the aquatic environment. To address the problem of GBCA in the water system as a whole, collaboration is necessary between all stakeholders, including the producers of GBCA, medical professionals and importantly, the consumers of drinking water, i.e. the patients. This paper aims to make healthcare professionals aware of the opportunity to take the lead in making informed decisions about the use of GBCA and provides an overview of the different options for action.In this paper, we first provide a summary on the metabolism and clinical use of GBCA, then the environmental fate and observations of GBCA, followed by measures to reduce the use of GBCA. The environmental impact of GBCA can be reduced by (1) measures focusing on the application of GBCA by means of weight-based contrast volume reduction, GBCA with higher relaxivity per mmol of Gd, contrast-enhancing sequences, and post-processing; and (2) measures that reduce the waste of GBCA, including the use of bulk packaging and collecting residues of GBCA at the point of application.Critical relevance statement This review aims to make healthcare professionals aware of the environmental impact of GBCA and the opportunity for them to take the lead in making informed decisions about GBCA use and the different options to reduce its environmental burden.Key points• Gadolinium-based contrast agents are found in sources of drinking water and constitute an environmental risk.• Radiologists have a wide spectrum of options to reduce GBCA use without compromising diagnostic quality.• Radiology can become more sustainable by adopting such measures in clinical practice.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of the Cancer-Targeting MRI Contrast Agent MT218 in Healthy Males

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of MT218, a peptide-targeted gadolinium-based contrast agent, in healthy males.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose study including 30 healthy male subjects. In each dose group (0.01, 0.02, 0.04, and 0.08 mmol/kg), 4 subjects received MT218 and 2 subjects received placebo (saline) in bolus injections. The highest dose group (0.08 mmol/kg) was assessed in 2 cohorts, 1 fasted and 1 nonfasted. Clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and electrocardiograms were investigated. Gadolinium concentrations were measured in plasma samples collected before administration and over a 24-hour period postinjection, and in urine specimens collected until 22 days. A noncompartmental model was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. A clinical and biological safety follow-up was carried out for up to 6 months.

RESULTS

No clinically significant modifications in biochemistry, hematology, urinalysis, electrocardiogram parameters, or vital signs were reported at any time point for any treatment group. No serious adverse events were observed in any dose group. Transient dizziness, hyperhidrosis, and injection site coldness were the main adverse events reported in both the MT218 and placebo groups. The mean total apparent clearance decreased slightly with increasing dose, and the median plasma t 1/2 ranged from 1.7 hours in the 0.01 mmol/kg group to 2.7 hours in the 0.08 mmol/kg nonfasted group. MT218 was rapidly excreted via renal filtration with 42.9% to 52.8% of the injected dose measured in urine within the first hour after administration, and 92.5% to 117.3% in urine within 24 hours. No Gd was detected by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in urine after 21 days.

CONCLUSION

Single intravenous administration of MT218 was safely tolerated in the healthy males. Its pharmacokinetic parameters and safety profile are well aligned with those of other gadolinium-based contrast agents.

A Comprehensive Overview of the Efficacy and Safety of Gadopiclenol: A New Contrast Agent for MRI of the CNS and Body

ABSTRACT

This review describes the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of gadopiclenol, a new macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration at the dose of 0.05 mmol/kg. Gadopiclenol is a high relaxivity contrast agent that shares similar pharmacokinetic characteristics with other macrocyclic GBCAs, including a predominant renal excretion. In pediatric patients aged 2-17 years, the pharmacokinetic parameters (assessed through a population pharmacokinetics model) were comparable to those observed in adults, indicating no need for age-based dose adjustment. For contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the central nervous system (CNS) and body indications, gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg was shown to be noninferior to gadobutrol at 0.1 mmol/kg in terms of 3 lesion visualization parameters (ie, lesion border delineation, internal morphology, and contrast enhancement). Moreover, for contrast-enhanced MRI of the CNS, compared with gadobenate dimeglumine at 0.1 mmol/kg, gadopiclenol exhibited superior contrast-to-noise ratio at 0.1 mmol/kg and comparable contrast-to-noise ratio at 0.05 mmol/kg. A pooled safety analysis of 1047 participants showed a favorable safety profile for gadopiclenol. Comparative studies showed that the incidence and nature of adverse drug reactions with gadopiclenol were comparable to those observed with other GBCAs. Importantly, no significant safety concerns were identified in pediatric and elderly patients, as well as in patients with renal impairment. Overall, these findings support the clinical utility and safety of gadopiclenol for MRI in adult and pediatric patients aged 2 years and older in CNS and body indications.

A New Era in Magnetic Resonance Contrast Media

ABSTRACT

Next-generation gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), including both high relaxivity agents and targeted agents, and manganese-based agents with a high probably of commercial success are discussed in some depth. It is highly likely that gadopiclenol and gadoquatrane, both next-generation high relaxivity gadolinium-based compounds, will come in time to replace the current macrocyclic gadolinium chelates, despite the wide acceptance, very high safety profile, and high stability of the latter group. Current research has also made possible the development of 2 new targeted gadolinium chelates, which look very promising, with the potential to improve cancer detection (for both MT218 and ProCA32.collagen) as well as diseases of collagen (for the latter agent). Further work with manganese-based compounds, a topic left fallow for more than 20 years, has also now produced 2 agents with high potential for clinical use, one (manganese chloride tetrahydrate, administered orally) developed primarily for imaging of the liver and the other (Mn-PyC3A, administered intravenously) as a gadolinium-free replacement for the GBCAs. New detail has recently emerged regarding specific circumscribed subregions of the brain with specialized cytoarchitecture and functions in which high gadolinium concentrations are seen following injection of the linear agent gadodiamide. These findings pave the way for tailored functional neurological testing, specifically in patients at potential risk due to the continued wide use in many countries across the world of the linear GBCAs. The impact of artificial intelligence is also critically discussed, with its most likely applications being dose reduction and new clinical indications.

Preclinical Safety Assessment of Gadopiclenol: A High-Relaxivity Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based MRI Contrast Agent

OBJECTIVE

Gadopiclenol is a new high-relaxivity macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system and other body regions. The product has been approved by US Food and Drug Administration and is currently being evaluated by European Medicines Agency. For risk assessment of the single diagnostic use in humans, the safety profile of gadopiclenol was evaluated with a series of preclinical studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With exception of dose-ranging studies, all safety pharmacology and toxicology studies were performed in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice principles. Safety pharmacology studies were conducted to assess potential effects on cardiovascular (in vitro and in dogs), respiratory (in rats and guinea pigs), neurological (in rats), and renal endpoints (in rats). Toxicology studies were also performed to investigate acute toxicity (in rats and mice), extended single-dose (in rats and dogs) and repeated-dose toxicity (in rats and dogs), reproductive (in rats), developmental (in rats and rabbits) and juvenile toxicity (in rats), as well as genotoxicity (in vitro and in rats), local tolerance (in rabbits), potential immediate hypersensitivity (in guinea pigs), and potential tissue retention of gadolinium (in rats).

RESULTS

Safety pharmacology studies conducted at high intravenous (IV) doses showed a satisfactory tolerance of gadopiclenol in the main body systems. After either single or repeated IV dosing (14 and 28 days) in rats and dogs, gadopiclenol was well tolerated even at high doses. The no-observed-adverse-effect level values (ie, the highest experimental dose without adverse effects) representing between 8 times in rats and 44 times in dogs (based on the exposure), the exposure achieved in humans at the intended diagnostic dose, provide a high safety margin. No or only minor and reversible effects on body weight, food consumption, clinical signs, clinical pathology parameters, or histology were observed at the highest doses. The main histological finding consists in renal tubular vacuolations (exacerbated after repeated exposure), which supports a well-known finding for this class of compounds that has no physiological consequence on kidney function. Reproductive toxicity studies showed no evidence of effects on reproductive performance, fertility, perinatal and postnatal development in rats, or reproductive development in rats or rabbits. The safety profile of gadopiclenol in juvenile rats was satisfactory like in adults. Gadopiclenol was not genotoxic in vitro in the Ames test, a mouse lymphoma assay, and a rat in vivo micronucleus test. There were no signs of local intolerance at the injection site after IV and intra-arterial administration in rabbits. However, because of minor signs of intolerance after perivenous administration, misadministration must be avoided. Gadopiclenol exhibited no signs of potential to induce immediate hypersensitivity in guinea pigs.

CONCLUSIONS

High safety margins were observed between the single diagnostic dose of 0.05 mmol/kg in humans and the doses showing effects in animal studies. Gadopiclenol is, therefore, well tolerated in various species (mice, rats, dogs, rabbits, and guinea pigs). All observed preclinical data support the clinical approval.

Detection of Brain Metastases by Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Comparison of Gadopiclenol and Gadobenate in a Mouse Model

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of gadopiclenol, a high-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agent to detect brain metastases in mice as a function of dose (0.08 mmol/kg or 0.1 mmol/kg) compared with gadobenate at 0.1 mmol/kg.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Brain metastases were induced by ultrasound-guided intracardiac implantation of 1.10 5 MDA-MB-231Br cells in the left ventricle of 18 anesthetized Balb/c Nude nu/nu female mice. At day 28 ± 3 after cell injection, each mouse received 2 crossover intravenous injections at 24-hour intervals, randomly selected from 2 doses of gadopiclenol (0.08 mmol/kg or 0.1 mmol/kg) and gadobenate (0.1 mmol/kg) with n = 6 mice/group (3 groups). Brain magnetic resonance imaging sessions were performed at 4 weeks on a 2.35 T magnet with a 3-dimensional T1-weighted high-resolution gradient echo sequence, before and after each injection. Images were blindly and randomly analyzed to detect enhancing lesions. Contrast-to-noise ratio between the metastases and the surrounding healthy parenchyma was calculated, based on region-of-interest signal measurements. In 2 animals per group, an early time point was added to the protocol (day 22 ± 3) to evaluate the sensitivity of detection as a function of time. After the last imaging session, the presence and location of whole-brain metastases were confirmed by histology in 4 mice.

RESULTS

After gadopiclenol, approximately twice as many metastases were detected compared with gadobenate, regardless of the dose. Contrast-to-noise ratios of the detected metastases were 2.3 and 3.3 times higher with gadopiclenol at 0.08 mmol/kg and 0.1 mmol/kg, respectively, compared with gadobenate at 0.1 mmol/kg ( P < 0.0001). Gadopiclenol at the dose of 0.1 mmol/kg resulted in a 1.4-fold higher contrast compared with gadopiclenol at 0.08 mmol/kg ( P < 0.02). In a subset of mice that were imaged 1 week earlier, 2 metastases were detected with gadopiclenol and not with gadobenate.

CONCLUSIONS

The high-relaxivity macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent gadopiclenol allowed higher diagnostic performance for detecting brain enhancing metastases in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio and number of detected metastases compared with gadobenate, at both equal (0.1 mmol/kg) dose and 20% lower Gd dose (0.08 mmol/kg). Tumor detection was higher after gadopiclenol at the dose of 0.1 mmol/kg compared with 0.08 mmol/kg.

MRI Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media: Meeting Radiological, Clinical, and Environmental Needs

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are routinely used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). They are essential for choosing the most appropriate medical or surgical strategy for patients with serious pathologies, particularly in oncologic, inflammatory, and cardiovascular diseases. However, GBCAs have been associated with an increased risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal failure, as well as the possibility of deposition in the brain, bones, and other organs, even in patients with normal renal function. Research is underway to reduce the quantity of gadolinium injected, without compromising image quality and diagnosis. The next generation of GBCAs will enable a reduction in the gadolinium dose administered. Gadopiclenol is the first of this new generation of GBCAs, with high relaxivity, thus having the potential to reduce the gadolinium dose while maintaining good in vivo stability due to its macrocyclic structure. High-stability and high-relaxivity GBCAs will be one of the solutions for reducing the dose of gadolinium to be administered in clinical practice, while the development of new technologies, including optimization of MRI acquisitions, new contrast mechanisms, and artificial intelligence may help reduce the need for GBCAs. Future solutions may involve a combination of next-generation GBCAs and image-processing techniques to optimize diagnosis and treatment planning while minimizing exposure to gadolinium. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Instant Macrocyclizations via Multicomponent Reactions

Macrocycles fascinate chemists due to both their structure and their applications. However, we still lack efficient and sustainable synthetic methods, giving us straightforward access to them. Herein, a rapid macrocyclization utilizing a two-step, one-pot approach based on orthogonal multicomponent reaction (MCR) tactics is introduced. This synthetic protocol, which is based on Ugi and Groebke-Blackburn-Bienaymé reactions with isocyanides tethered to alkyl tosylates, yields medium sized macrocycles that are otherwise difficult to achieve. Single crystal structures reveal conformational reorganization via intramolecular hydrogen bonding, and modeling studies profile the synthesized libraries.

Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Gadopiclenol: A Newly Emerging Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are one of the most commonly used agents in magnetic resonance imaging. Gadopiclenol is a new GBCA aimed at providing improved diagnostic efficacy with a favorable safety profile. The proposed advantages are due to its specific pharmacological properties, one of which is high relaxivity values. The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy, diagnostic accuracy, and safety of gadopiclenol in comparison to other currently used gadolinium-based contrast agents. PubMed and other database systems were used to identify relevant studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, resulting in 10 articles that were included in the review. The outcomes were reviewed according to several factors regarding efficacy and accuracy in terms of qualitative and quantitative descriptors relative to properties of enhancement provided by the contrast agent. In terms of safety profile, a number of outcomes were assessed such as the occurrence of serious adverse effects, severe kidney injury, and organ-based contrast retention. Gadopiclenol was found to provide outcomes comparable to other commonly used GBCAs at lower doses with further favorable results at higher doses while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. However, it was found to have high rates of retention within the liver and can cause nonsignificant QT prolongation in healthy individuals, which arguably creates the need for further research regarding more long-term implications of these possible adverse effects.

2022 FDA TIDES (Peptides and Oligonucleotides) Harvest

A total of 37 new drug entities were approved in 2022; although that year registered the lowest number of drug approvals since 2016, the TIDES class consolidated its presence with a total of five authorizations (four peptides and one oligonucleotide). Interestingly, 23 out of 37 drugs were first-in-class and thus received fast-track designation by the FDA in categories such as breakthrough therapy, priority review voucher, orphan drug, accelerated approval, and so on. Here, we analyze the TIDES approved in 2022 on the basis of their chemical structure, medical target, mode of action, administration route, and common adverse effects.