Improvement in diagnosis of metastatic pituitary carcinoma by 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT

Aggressive and Metastatic Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Therapeutic Management and Off-Label Drug Use

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are the most common pituitary tumors and the second most common brain tumors. Although the vast majority (>90%) are benign, a small percentage (<2%) are aggressive. These aggressive PitNETs (AgPitNETs) are defined by the presence of radiological invasion, a high rate of cell proliferation, resistance to conventional treatments, and/or a high propensity for recurrence. Lastly, there are the rare pituitary carcinomas, also known as metastatic PitNETs (MetPitNETs), which account for only 0.2% of cases and are defined by the presence of craniospinal or distant metastases. At present, there are no definitive factors that allow us to predict with certainty the aggressive behavior of PitNETs, making the therapeutic management of AgPitNETs a real challenge. Surgery is considered the first-line treatment for AgPitNETs and MetPitNETs. Radiation therapy can be effective in controlling tumor growth and regulating hormone hypersecretion. Currently, there are no approved non-endocrine medical therapies for the management of AgPitNETs/MetPitNETs, mainly due to the lack of randomized controlled clinical trials. As a result, many of the medical therapies used are off-label drugs, and several are under investigation. Temozolomide (TMZ) is now recognized as the primary medical treatment following the failure of standard therapy (medical treatment, surgery, and radiotherapy) in AgPitNETs/MetPitNETs due to its ability to improve overall and progression-free survival rates in responding patients over 5 years. Other therapeutic options include pituitary-targeted therapies (dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogs), hormonal antisecretory drugs, non-hormonal targeted therapies, radionuclide treatments, and immunotherapy. However, the number of patients who have undergone these treatments is limited, and the results obtained to date have been inconsistent. As a result, it is imperative to expand the cohort of patients undergoing treatment to better determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of these drugs for individuals with AgPitNETs/MetPitNETs.

Approach to the Patient With Prolactinoma

Prolactinomas are the most common pituitary tumor histotype, with microprolactinomas being prevalent in women and macroprolactinomas in men. Hyperprolactinemia is among the most common causes of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in both sexes, prompting medical advice for hypogonadism (infertility, oligo-amenorrhea, impotence, osteoporosis/osteopenia) in both sexes, and for signs and symptoms of mass effects (hypopituitarism, visual loss, optic chiasm compression, cranial nerve deficits, headaches) predominantly in men. Diagnostic workup involves a single prolactin measurement and pituitary imaging, but some laboratory artifacts (ie, the "hook effect" and macroprolactin) can complicate or delay the diagnosis. The treatment of choice for prolactinomas is represented by dopamine agonists, mainly cabergoline, which are able to induce disease control, restore fertility in both sexes, and definitively cure one-third of patients, thus permitting treatment discontinuation. Pregnancy and menopause may promote spontaneous prolactin decline and anticipate cabergoline discontinuation in women. Surgery and/or radiotherapy are indicated in case of resistance to cabergoline not overcome by the increase in drug dose up to the maximally tolerated or the patient's personal choice of surgery. The evidence of resistance to cabergoline in invasive and proliferative tumors may indicate biological aggressiveness, thus requiring alternative therapeutic approaches mainly based on temozolomide use as monotherapy or combined with radiotherapy. In uncontrolled patients, new medical approaches (alternative hormonal treatments, cytotoxic drugs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, mTOR/Akt inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or immunotherapy) may be offered but the experience collected to date is still very scant. This article reviews different facets of prolactinomas and discusses approaches to the condition in more common clinical situations.

Somatostatin Receptor-PET/CT/MRI of Head and Neck Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Due to its high sensitivity, somatostatin receptor-PET may detect smaller lesions and more extensive disease than contrast-enhanced MR imaging, while the superior spatial resolution of MR imaging enables lesions to be accurately localized. We compared results of somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI with those of MR imaging alone and assessed the added value of vertex-to-thigh imaging for head and neck neuroendocrine tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Somatostatin receptor-PET/CT was acquired as limited brain or head and neck imaging, with optional vertex-to-thigh imaging, following administration of 64CU/68GA DOTATATE. Somatostatin receptor-PET was fused with separately acquired contrast-enhanced MR imaging. DOTATATE activity was classified as comparable, more extensive, and/or showing additional lesions compared with MR imaging. Vertex-to-thigh findings were classified as positive or negative for metastatic disease or incidental.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (with 13 meningiomas, 11 paragangliomas, 1 metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma, 1 middle ear neuroendocrine adenoma, 1 external auditory canal mass, 1 pituitary carcinoma, 1 olfactory neuroblastoma, 1 orbital mass) were imaged. Five had no evidence of somatostatin receptor-positive lesions and were excluded. In 11/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI and MR imaging were comparable. In 7/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI showed more extensive disease, while in 9/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI identified additional lesions. On vertex-to-thigh imaging, 1 of 17 patients was positive for metastatic disease, 8 of 17 were negative, and 8 of 17 demonstrated incidental findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Somatostatin receptor-PET detected additional lesions and more extensive disease than contrast-enhanced MR imaging alone, while vertex-to-thigh imaging showed a low incidence of metastatic disease. Somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI enabled superior anatomic delineation of tumor burden, while any discrepancies were readily addressed. Somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI has the potential to play an important role in presurgical and radiation therapy planning of head and neck neuroendocrine tumors.

The Role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET Radiotracers in Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Ongoing Clinical Trials

Simple Summary

[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging has recently been introduced in the management of patients with brain tumors, mostly meningiomas and pituitary adenomas or carcinomas. The current literature demonstrated the superior diagnostic accuracy of this imaging modality, especially for lesions difficult to be detected or characterized on conventional imaging protocols, such as skull base or transosseous meningiomas. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers also seem to provide superior volume contouring for radiotherapy planning and may also be used to evaluate the tumor’s overexpression of somatostatin receptors for devising patient-tailored peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. In this review, we comprehensively analyzed the current literature discussing the implementation of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging in brain tumors, further presenting ongoing clinical trials and suggesting potential future applications.

Abstract

Background: The development of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers has garnered interest in neuro-oncology, to increase accuracy in diagnostic, radiation planning, and neurotheranostics protocols. We systematically reviewed the literature on the current uses of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in brain tumors. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to include published studies and ongoing trials utilizing [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in patients with brain tumors. Results: We included 63 published studies comprising 1030 patients with 1277 lesions, and 4 ongoing trials. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET was mostly used for diagnostic purposes (62.5%), followed by treatment planning (32.7%), and neurotheranostics (4.8%). Most lesions were meningiomas (93.6%), followed by pituitary adenomas (2.8%), and the DOTATOC tracer (53.2%) was used more frequently than DOTATATE (39.1%) and DOTANOC (5.7%), except for diagnostic purposes (DOTATATE 51.1%). [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies were mostly required to confirm the diagnosis of meningiomas (owing to their high SSTR2 expression and tracer uptake) or evaluate their extent of bone invasion, and improve volume contouring for better radiotherapy planning. Some studies reported the uncommon occurrence of SSTR2-positive brain pathology challenging the diagnostic accuracy of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for meningiomas. Pre-treatment assessment of tracer uptake rates has been used to confirm patient eligibility (high somatostatin receptor-2 expression) for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) (i.e., neurotheranostics) for recurrent meningiomas and pituitary carcinomas. Conclusion: [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies may revolutionize the routine neuro-oncology practice, especially in meningiomas, by improving diagnostic accuracy, delineation of radiotherapy targets, and patient eligibility for radionuclide therapies.

A Rare Case of Pituitary Carcinoma With Bone Metastases: 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Findings

ABSTRACT

Pituitary carcinomas are extremely rare and aggressive tumors that comprise only 0.2% of all pituitary tumors. Because of its rarity, pituitary carcinomas are difficult to diagnose. Conventional imaging methods are inadequate to detect metastatic lesions. Pituitary carcinomas are neuroendocrine tumors and express somatostatin receptors; therefore, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT may be used in the staging of these rare tumors. Herein, we present an exceptional case of pituitary carcinoma with sclerotic skeletal metastases showing 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake.

68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Pituitary Carcinoma

ABSTRACT

A 47-year-old woman with atypical pituitary adenoma was referred to the neurosurgery department due to recent back pain. She had multiple transsphenoidal surgery, stereotactic body radiation, and 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy. Her spinal MRI showed multiple spinal masses. The patient underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT to confirm the metastatic spread of the disease. PET/CT images showed increased uptake at the local recurrent tumor site and spinal metastases confirmed by biopsy to pituitary carcinoma. Our case presents the role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with pituitary carcinoma.

Using Molecular Imaging to Enhance Decision Making in the Management of Pituitary Adenomas

In most patients with suspected or confirmed pituitary adenomas (PAs), MRI, performed using T1- (with or without gadolinium enhancement) and T2-weighted sequences, provides sufficient information to guide effective clinical decision making. In other patients, additional MR sequences (e.g., gradient recalled echo, fluid-attenuation inversion recovery, MR elastography, or MR angiography) may be deployed to improve adenoma detection, assess tumoral consistency, or aid distinction from other sellar/parasellar lesions (e.g., aneurysm, meningioma). However, there remains a small but important subgroup of patients in whom primary or secondary intervention (e.g., first or redo transsphenoidal surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery) is limited by the inability of MRI to accurately localize the site(s) of de novo, persistent, or recurrent PA. Emerging evidence indicates that hybrid imaging, which combines molecular (e.g. 11C-methionine PET) and cross-sectional (MRI) modalities, can enable the detection and precise localization of sites of active tumor to guide targeted intervention. This not only increases the likelihood of achieving complete remission with preservation of remaining normal pituitary function but may mitigate the need for long-term (even lifelong) high-cost medical therapies. Here, we review published evidence supporting the use of molecular imaging in the management of PAs, including our own 10-y experience with 11C-methionine PET.

Approach to the Treatment of a Patient with an Aggressive Pituitary Tumor

A small subset of pituitary adenomas grows despite maximal treatment with standard therapies; namely, surgery and radiotherapy. These aggressive tumors demonstrate 2 patterns of growth: they may be locally aggressive or metastasize distantly, either hematogenously or through the spinal fluid. Further surgery and radiotherapy may be helpful for palliation of symptoms, but they are rarely definitive in the management of these malignant tumors. The only chemotherapy with established activity in the treatment of pituitary tumors is the alkylating agent temozolomide. At most, 50% of patients exhibit an objective response to temozolomide and the median time to progression is short; thus, there remains a significant unmet need for effective treatments within this patient population. Several targeted agents have reported activity in this tumor type-including small molecule inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors, and other biologics-but remain investigational at this time.

Advances in the Imaging of Pituitary Tumors

In most patients with pituitary adenomas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential to guide effective decision-making. T1- and T2-weighted sequences allow the majority of adenomas to be readily identified. Supplementary MR sequences (e.g. FLAIR; MR angiography) may also help inform surgery. However, in some patients MRI findings are 'negative' or equivocal (e.g. with failure to reliably identify a microadenoma or to distinguish postoperative change from residual/recurrent disease). Molecular imaging [e.g. ¹¹C-methionine PET/CT coregistered with volumetric MRI (Met-PET/MR^CR)] may allow accurate localisation of the site of de novo or persistent disease to guide definitive treatment (e.g. surgery or radiosurgery).

Targeted systemic and peptide radio-ligand therapy for aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas

Aggressive pituitary tumors comprise a rare but challenging subset of pituitary tumors. A major issue currently is the absence of a holistic definition that reliably identifies these tumors in a prospective manner. Although comprehensive evaluation of patient gender, age, local invasiveness, treatment responses, radiological and histopathological features may be informative to assess the potential for aggressiveness, a definitive diagnosis of this entity cannot be confidently made until disease progression is actually observed despite standard medical and surgical therapy. Failure to diagnose these aggressive pituitary tumors early may impede initiation of suitable intensive stepwise multimodal treatments, and lessen their ultimate therapeutic success. Even though current therapeutic options for aggressive pituitary tumors are suboptimal in many cases, large-scale randomized prospective clinic trials are impractical and will likely never be conducted due to the rarity of this disease entity. Therefore, the majority of novel therapies in this subset of tumors derive from case reports or small case series, which greatly reduces their validity to make strong recommendations. This chapter, as part of this series on aggressive pituitary tumors, focuses on the role of systemic targeted medical and peptide radio-receptor therapy in treatment of aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas, and discusses future directions in these fields.

Aggressive prolactinomas: how to manage?

PURPOSE

Aggressive prolactinomas are defined as radiologically invasive tumors which cannot be cured by surgery, and that have an unusually rapid rate of tumor growth despite dopamine agonist treatment and surgery. In some cases, metastasis occurs, defining prolactin carcinoma which is the second most frequent pituitary carcinoma.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to review the available data on the treatment of aggressive pituitary prolactinomas or carcinomas.

RESULTS

When optimal standard therapies (high dose cabergoline, surgery and radiotherapy) failed, temozolomide, an alkylating drug, is currently the best option, allowing to control tumor growth in about 50% of treated prolactinomas and improving overall survival of these patients. However, long-term complete response occurs in a limited subgroup of tumors. Alternative drugs could be discussed in a subset of aggressive prolactinomas either before temozolomide (pasireotide, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy…) or after temozolomide failure.

CONCLUSION

Despite the significant improvement obtained with the use of temozolomide, a need for alternative drugs persists since a majority of these tumors are resistant or will recur during the follow-up. Patients suffering from such a rare condition should have access to clinical trials available for other types of rare cancers, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy.

The pituitary in nuclear medicine imaging

The pituitary is an endocrine gland with ability to uptake diverse radiopharmaceuticals and, therefore, susceptible to be investigated by nuclear medicine diagnostic procedures. Although this topic has been scarcely scrutinized, we have data indicating that somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with¹¹¹In-DTPA-D-Phe-octreotide or ^99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC may be of clinical utility in the diagnosis of some pituitary adenomas (PA). Only a few studies have evaluated the diagnostic performance of ^99mTc-MIBI and ^99mTc (V)-DMSA scintigraphy in pituitary disease. Scintigraphy using ¹²³I-methoxybenzamide (¹²³I-IBZM) might be useful in macroprolactinomas expressing dopamine D2 receptors. Pituitary gland does not usually accumulate 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-d-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) and, therefore, it is not visualized on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies with this radiotracer. The pituitary uptake on¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans performed in the follow-up of oncological patients are uncommon. However, 60% of these incidental findings are due to PA, mainly non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas, and a small percentage to metastases or other pituitary lesions. Interestingly, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT may identify hypophysitis induced by different immunotherapeutic agents used in cancer patients. Positive ¹⁸F-FDG uptake has been reported in a high percentage of patients with PA, mainly macroadenomas and it seems that there is correlation between tumor size and SUVmax. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT may identify functioning and non-functioning PA, although this technique is more useful in the detection of remaining normal pituitary tissue after transsphenoidal adenomectomy, and in the confirmation of recurrence of functioning PA, such as thyrotroph-secreting PA. Furthermore, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake has potential therapeutic implications on molecular-targeted therapy. Lastly, other radiopharmaceuticals that have shown to be taken up in some patients with pituitary disease include ¹⁸F-DOPA (prolactinoma), ¹¹C-methionine (residual or recurrent PA), O-(2-¹⁸F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (metastasis), ¹⁸F-choline (silent adenoma, ectopic corticotropinoma), and ¹³N-ammonia (hypopituitarism).

Emerging and Novel Treatments for Pituitary Tumors

A subset of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) have an aggressive behavior, showing resistance to treatment and/or multiple recurrences in spite of the optimal use of standard therapies (surgery, conventional medical treatments, and radiotherapy). To date, for aggressive PitNETs, temozolomide (TMZ) has been the most used therapeutic option, and has resulted in an improvement in the five-year survival rate in responders. However, given the fact that roughly only one third of patients showed a partial or complete radiological response on the first course of TMZ, and even fewer patients responded to a second course of TMZ, other treatment options are urgently needed. Emerging therapies consist predominantly of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (20 cases), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapy (12 cases), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (10 cases), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (six cases), and more recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (one case). Here, we present the available clinical cases published in the literature for each of these treatments. The therapies that currently show the most promise (based on the achievement of partial radiological response in a certain number of cases) are immune checkpoint inhibitors, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapy. In the future, further improvement of these therapies and the development of other novel therapies, their use in personalized medicine, and a better understanding of combination therapies, will hopefully result in better outcomes for patients bearing aggressive PitNETs.

Aggressive and Malignant Prolactinomas

Prolactin-secreting tumors (prolactinomas) represent the most common pituitary tumor type, accounting for 47-66% of functional pituitary tumors. Prolactinomas are usually benign and controllable tumors as they express abundant levels of dopamine type 2 receptor (D2), and can be treated with dopaminergic drugs, effectively reducing prolactin levels and tumor volume. However, a proportion of prolactinomas exhibit aggressive features (including invasiveness, relevant growth despite adequate dopamine agonist treatment, and recurrence potential) and few may exhibit metastasizing potential (carcinomas). In this context, the clinical, pathological, and molecular definitions of malignant and aggressive prolactinomas remain to be clearly defined, as primary prolactin-secreting carcinomas are similar to aggressive adenomas until the presence of metastases is detected. Indeed, standard molecular and histological analyses do not reflect differences between carcinomas and adenomas at a first glance and have limitations in prediction of the aggressive progression of prolactinomas, wherein the causes underlying the aggressive behavior remain unknown. Herein we present a comprehensive, multidisciplinary review of the most relevant epidemiological, clinical, pathological, genetic, biochemical, and molecular aspects of aggressive and malignant prolactinomas.

Aggressive and malignant pituitary tumours: state-of-the-art

Pituitary adenomas are unique in multiple ways. They are rarely malignant in terms of metastases; yet, they may be aggressive. Their cancerous potential is defined in a classic oncological way by the ability to metastasise, and therefore, it has been crucial to differentiate this process from aggressive behaviour, characterised as a particularly invasive and/or recurrent behaviour and resistance to common modalities of therapy. Recently, however, important changes have been introduced to the diagnosis and management of aggressive and malignant pituitary tumours including the 4th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for endocrine tumours (2017) as well as ESE Clinical Guidelines (2018), although an attempt to establish predictive and/or prognostic markers of clinical aggressiveness remains difficult. In this review, we focus on a group of pituitary tumours causing significant problems in clinical practice and requiring multidisciplinary input. We summarise updates in definitions of tumour invasiveness, aggressiveness and malignant transformation, as well as histological classification, and emphasise the new considerations regarding aggressive and malignant potential and its relationship to therapeutic strategies.

Malignant transformation in non-functioning pituitary adenomas (pituitary carcinoma)

Non-functioning pituitary carcinomas (NFPC) are defined as tumours of adenophyseal origin with craniospinal or systemic dissemination, with the absence of a hormonal hypersecretion syndrome. These are a histologically heterogenous group of tumours, comprising gonadotroph, null cell, "silent" tumours of corticotroph, somatotroph or lactotroph cell lineages as well as plurihormonal Pit-1 tumours. NFPC are exceedingly rare, and hence few cases have been described. This review has identified 38 patients with NFPC reported in the literature. Recurrent invasive non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) were observed in a majority of patients. Various factors have been identified as markers of the potential for aggressive behaviour, including rapid tumour growth, growth after radiotherapy, gain or shift of hormone secretion and raised proliferative markers. Typically, there is a latency of several years from the original presentation with an NFPA to identification of metastases and only 5 cases reported with rapidly progressive malignant disease within 1 month of presentation. Therapeutic options include debulking surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy with temozolomide recommended as first line systemic treatment. Although long-term survivors are described, prognosis remains generally very poor (median survival 8 months). Improvements in molecular tumour profiling may assist in predicting tumour behaviour, guide therapeutic choices and identify novel therapies.

European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Pituitary tumours are common and easily treated by surgery or medical treatment in most cases. However, a small subset of pituitary tumours does not respond to standard medical treatment and presents with multiple local recurrences (aggressive pituitary tumours) and in rare occasion with metastases (pituitary carcinoma). The present European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) guideline aims to provide clinical guidance on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up in aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas.

METHODS

We decided upfront, while acknowledging that literature on aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas is scarce, to systematically review the literature according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. The review focused primarily on first- and second-line treatment in aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas. We included 14 single-arm cohort studies (total number of patients = 116) most on temozolomide treatment (n = 11 studies, total number of patients = 106). A positive treatment effect was seen in 47% (95% CI: 36-58%) of temozolomide treated. Data from the recently performed ESE survey on aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas (165 patients) were also used as backbone for the guideline. SELECTED RECOMMENDATION: (i) Patients with aggressive pituitary tumours should be managed by a multidisciplinary expert team. (ii) Histopathological analyses including pituitary hormones and proliferative markers are needed for correct tumour classification. (iii) Temozolomide monotherapy is the first-line chemotherapy for aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas after failure of standard therapies; treatment evaluation after 3 cycles allows identification of responder and non-responder patients. (iv) In patients responding to first-line temozolomide, we suggest continuing treatment for at least 6 months in total. Furthermore, the guideline offers recommendations for patients who recurred after temozolomide treatment, for those who did not respond to temozolomide and for patients with systemic metastasis.

Pituitary carcinoma: A case report and discussion of potential value of combined use of Ga-68 DOTATATE and F-18 FDG PET/CT scan to better choose therapy

BACKGROUND

Pituitary carcinoma is extremely rare and carries a very poor prognosis. In most cases, apparently indolent tumors become malignant; however, there are no satisfactory biomarkers for predicting tumor behavior. Thus, scientific advances in the search for new biological markers, diagnostic methods, and therapies are needed to improve the prognosis of these patients.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report the case of a woman with initial diagnosis of nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma which evolved to carcinoma after 4 years. Diagnosis was confirmed after biopsy of metastatic pulmonary nodules, in which neoplastic cells were immunohistochemically positive for chromogranin, synaptotophysin, prolactin, and growth hormone. Investigation with conventional somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) with Ga-68 DOTATATE and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) are showed. During temozolomide therapy, our patient had severe pancytopenia resulting in death from generalized infection despite 10 days of intensive care.

CONCLUSION

The present case of an aggressive pituitary carcinoma rising from a typical adenoma illustrates the importance of developing new prognostic biomarkers in these cases. In addition to demonstrating a serious side effect with the use of temozolomide, our case report suggests that the combined use of Ga-68 DOTATATE and F-18 FDG PET-CT scan may scale somatostatin receptors vs. tumor aggressiveness, therefore, helping to better choose the therapy for aggressive pituitary tumors.