Extensive Tumor Thrombosis of Portal Venous System Demonstrated on 68Ga-DOTATATE and 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT in a Patient With Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor

The Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) differ from other malignancies in their ability to produce hormones and biogenic amines, as well as offer a better prognosis in well-differentiated tumors. There are no definite data on the occurrence of thromboembolic events in NENs and no recommendations regarding the use of antithrombotic prophylaxis in this group. Accurate assessment of the thromboembolic risk in NENs represents an important issue, in order to reduce morbidity and mortality due to complications of VTE. The aim of this work was to review the occurrence of thromboembolic events in NENs and the use of antithrombotic prophylaxis in this group. A total of 28 studies identified on PubMed were analyzed. NENs, especially of pancreatic primary, exhibit an increased thrombotic risk. Atypical VTE locations are quite common in NENs. Hormonally active NENs are associated with a significantly increased thromboembolic risk. Further studies in NENs are needed to evaluate the parameters of coagulation and fibrinolysis as predictive biomarkers for VTE complications.

A prospective randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: compared with 68Ga-DOTATATE

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ⁶⁸ Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA-LM3 and compare them with ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively recruited and equally randomized into two arms: Arm A, patients would undergo a whole-body ⁶⁸ Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT scan on the 1st day and ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan on the 2nd day; Arm B, patients would undergo a whole-body ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA-LM3 PET/CT scan on the 1st day and ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan on the 2nd day. Biodistribution in normal organs, lesion detection ability, and tumor uptake were compared between antagonist and agonist in each arm.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients with well-differentiated NETs, 20 in each arm, were recruited in the study. ⁶⁸ Ga-NODAGA-LM3 showed a similar pattern as ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE, while ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA-LM3 demonstrated significantly lower uptake in almost all normal organs compared to ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE. Both ⁶⁸ Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA-LM3 showed superiority in lesion detection compared to ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE on lesion-based and patient-based comparison. ⁶⁸ Ga-NODAGA-LM3 showed a significantly higher tumor uptake (median SUVmax 29.1 versus 21.6, P < 0.05) and tumor-to-background ratio (median tumor-to-liver ratio 5.0 versus 2.9, P < 0.05) compared to ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE. ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA-LM3 showed comparable uptake (median SUVmax 16.1 versus 17.8, P = 0.714) and higher tumor-to-background ratio (median tumor-to-liver ratio 5.2 versus 2.1, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both ⁶⁸ Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA-LM3 are promising SSTR2 antagonists for neuroendocrine tumors. They demonstrated superiority in diagnostic efficacy compared to agonist ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04318561.

Positive Somatostatin Receptor Expression Demonstrated on 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT in a Neuroendocrine Tumor Patient With Negative Immunohistochemical Staining: Conflict or Heterogeneity

ABSTRACT

We present a case with pulmonary atypical carcinoid and multiple hepatic metastases. Immunohistochemical staining of liver biopsy sample was negative for somatostatin receptor subtype 2, but 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT scan revealed multiple positive lesions. The mismatch was actually caused by heterogeneous expression of somatostatin receptor in liver lesions.