The Detection Performance of 18 F-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-1007 PET/CT in Primary Prostate Cancer : A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

Personalised PET imaging in oncology: an umbrella review of meta-analyses to guide the appropriate radiopharmaceutical choice and indication

PURPOSE

For several years, oncological positron emission tomography (PET) has developed beyond 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG). This umbrella review of meta-analyses aims to provide up-to-date, comprehensive, high-level evidence to support appropriate referral for a specific radiopharmaceutical PET/computed tomography (CT) or PET/magnetic resonance (MR) in the diagnosis and staging of solid cancers other than brain malignancies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search on the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for meta-analyses assessing the accuracy of PET/CT and/or PET/MRI with [18F]FDG, somatostatin- receptor-targeting 68Ga-DOTA-peptides, 18F-labelled dihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F]DOPA), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligands, and fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPI) in the diagnosis/disease characterisation and staging of solid cancers other than brain tumours.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 449 scientific articles. After screening titles and abstracts and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected 173 meta-analyses to assess the strength of evidence. One article was selected from references. Sixty-four meta-analyses were finally considered. The current evidence corroborates the role of [18F]FDG as the main player in molecular imaging; PSMA tracers are useful in staging and re-staging prostate cancer; somatostatin-targeting peptides (e.g. [68Ga]Ga- DOTA-TOC and -TATE) or [18F]DOPA are valuable in neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). FAPI has emerged in gastric cancer assessment. According to search and selection criteria, no satisfactory meta-analysis was selected for the diagnosis/detection of oesophageal cancer, the diagnosis/detection and N staging of small cell lung cancer and hepatic cell carcinoma, the diagnosis/detection and M staging of melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma, cervical, vulvar and penis cancers, the N and M staging of lung and gastroenteropancreatic NET, testicular cancer, and chondrosarcoma, and the M staging of differentiated thyroid, bladder and anal cancers.

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive high-level evidence synthesised in the present umbrella review serves as a guiding compass for clinicians and imagers, aiding them in navigating the increasingly intricate seascape of PET examinations.

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) avid nonprostatic benign and malignant disease: a pictorial review

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is revolutionising the management of prostate cancer (PC) in primary staging and assessment of biochemical recurrence (BCR) through its higher diagnostic accuracy compared to both conventional imaging and previously available PET radiopharmaceuticals. PSMA is a transmembrane glycoprotein, highly expressed in prostate cancer, with its extracellular domain the target for PSMA PET radiopharmaceuticals. However, PSMA expression is not prostate specific and resultant PSMA uptake on PET-CT is not restricted to pathologies arising from the prostate gland. The increasing use of PSMA PET-CT has revealed PSMA uptake in a variety of non-prostatic benign and malignant diseases, which adds complexity to PET-CT interpretation and subsequent clinical management. This pictorial review will provide a thorough knowledge and understanding of the comprehensive range of PSMA avid non-prostatic benign and malignant diseases demonstrable on PSMA PET-CT, whilst highlighting the complimentary nature of other imaging modalities.

Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT Radiotracers in Staging and Restaging of Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer or Biochemical Recurrence: An Overview of Reviews

The aim of this overview was to consolidate existing evidence syntheses and provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence for 18F-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in the staging of high-risk prostate cancer and restaging after biochemical recurrence. An overview of reviews was performed and reported in line with the preferred reporting items for overview of reviews (PRIOR) statement and synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guidelines. A comprehensive database and grey literature search were conducted up to July 18, 2023. Systematic reviews were assessed using the risk of bias in systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE). 11 systematic reviews were identified; 10 were at high or unclear risk of bias. Evidence reported on a per-patient, per-lymph node, and per-lesion basis for sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy was identified. There was a lack of data on dose, adverse events and evidence directly comparing 18F-PSMA PET/CT to other imaging modalities. Evidence with moderate to very low certainty indicated high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 18F-PSMA PET/CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence. There was considerably lower certainty evidence and greater variability in effect estimates for outcomes for the combined intermediate/high-risk cohort. While evidence gaps remain for some outcomes, and most systematic reviews were at high or unclear risk of bias, the current evidence base is broadly supportive of 18F-PSMA PET/CT imaging in the staging and restaging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence.

Fluorine-18 prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007-avid indeterminate bone lesions in prostate cancer: clinical and PET/CT features to predict outcomes and prognosis

AIM

To determine clinical and fluorine-18 prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 (18F-PSMA-1007) integrated positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) features that could be used to interpret indeterminate bone lesions (IBLs) and assess the prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with IBLs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent PSMA PET/CT were analysed retrospectively. IBLs were identified as benign or malignant based on follow-up imaging and clinical management. Lesion- and patient-based assessments were performed to define features predictive of bone lesion results and determine clinical risk. Patients' prognosis was analysed based on clinical characteristics, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients (mean age ± SD, 72.1 ± 8 years) were evaluated and 158 IBLs were identified. Fifty-three (33.5%), 36 (22.8%), and 69 (43.7%) IBLs were benign, malignant, and equivocal, respectively. Variables including location, maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), and lymph node metastases (LNM) were related to the benignancy or malignancy of IBLs (p=0.046, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Regression analysis indicated that LNM, SUVmax, and location of IBLs could be predictors of lesion interpretation (p<0.001, p=0.002 and p=0.035). Patients with benign IBLs experienced the most considerable decreases in PSA and ALP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

LNM, SUVmax, and location may contribute to IBL interpretation. A rapid decrease in PSA and ALP levels might suggest a better prognosis for patients with benign IBLs.

18 F-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for lymph node staging in medium/high risk prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lymph node staging of prostate cancer (PCa) is important for planning and monitoring of treatment. 18 F-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography ( 18 F-PSMA PET/CT) has several advantages over 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT, but its diagnostic value requires further investigation. This meta-analysis focused on establishing the diagnostic utility of 18 F-PSMA PET/CT for lymph node staging in medium/high-risk PCa.

METHODS

We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases from inception to October 1, 2022. Prostate cancer, 18 F, lymph node, PSMA, and PET/CT were used as search terms and the language was limited to English. We additionally performed a manual search using the reference lists of key articles. Patients and study characteristics were extracted and the QUADAS-2 tool was employed to evaluate the quality of included studies. Sensitivity, specificity, the positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of 18 F-PSMA PET/CT. Stata 17 software was employed for calculation and statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of eight diagnostic tests including 734 individual samples and 6346 lymph nodes were included in this meta-analysis. At the patient level, the results of each consolidated summary were as follows: sensitivity of 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.73), specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97), PLR of 11.2 (95% CI 6.6-19.0), NLR of 0.46 (95% CI 0.31-0.68), DOR of 25 (95% CI 11-54), and AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.96). At the lesion level, the results of each consolidated summary were as follows: sensitivity of 0.40 (95% CI 0.21-0.62), specificity of 0.99 (95% CI 0.95-1.00), PLR of 40.0 (95% CI 9.1-176.3), NLR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.42-0.87), DOR of 66 (95% CI 14-311), and AUC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

18 F-PSMA PET/CT showed moderate sensitivity but high specificity in lymph node staging of medium/high-risk PCa. The diagnostic efficacy was almost equivalent to that reported for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT.

REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), No. CRD42023391101.

Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL versus 18F-Fluorocholine in initial staging of intermediate-/high-risk prostate cancer: a pilot study

AIM

To assess the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL with respect to 18F-Fluorocholine in initial staging of intermediate-/high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with recent diagnosis of intermediate-/high-risk PCa without androgen deprivation therapy and previous 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT (negative for extraprostatic disease or with oligometastatic disease) were referred to 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT. Patients' disease characteristic as grade group, D'Amico risk category (intermediate/high), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) closest to PET/CTs and its kinetics were obtained. The overall detection rate (DR) and molecular imaging TNM (miTNM) stage according to the prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE) criteria were assessed for both radiotracers, and their concordance (Kappa coefficient) was analyzed. The diagnostic and therapeutic impact of 18F-DCFPyL with respect to 18F-Fluorocholine was evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were analyzed (84.5% high-risk). 18F-Fluorocholine showed a higher DR than 18F-DCFPyL of prostate gland involvement (100% versus 93.1%) and pelvic node disease (37.9% versus 31%; k = 0.436, p = 0.001). On the other hand, 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT showed a higher DR of metastatic disease than 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT, 9/58 patients (15.5%): 3 M1a, 5 M1b and 1 M1c) versus 5/58 (8.6%) patients: 1 M1a and 4 M1b), k = 0.426; p = 0.001. No significant association was found between clinical characteristics (grade group, risk category, PSA level and kinetic) and 18F-Fluorocholine or 18F-DCFPyL results. The results of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT modified the previously planned treatment compared to 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT in 13 patients (22.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

18F-Fluorocholine and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a similar DR of prostate gland and lymph node involvement, although with moderate concordance for the latter. 18F-DCFPyL was superior to 18F-Fluorocholine in detecting regional and distant metastasis with a therapeutic impact in one of every five patients.

Application of targeted diagnosis of PSMA in the modality shift of prostate cancer diagnosis: a review

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a serious threat to the health of men all over the world. The progression of PCa varies greatly among different individuals. In clinical practice, some patients often progress to advanced PCa. Therefore, accurate imaging for diagnosis and staging of PCa is particularly important for clinical management of patients. Conventional imaging examinations such as MRI and CT cannot accurately diagnose the pathological stages of advanced PCa, especially metastatic lymph node (LN) stages. As a result, developing an accurate molecular targeted diagnosis is crucial for advanced PCa. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is of great value in the diagnosis of PCa because of its specific expression in PCa. At present, researchers have developed positron emission tomography (PET) targeting PSMA. A large number of studies have confirmed that it not only has a higher tumor detection rate, but also has a higher diagnostic efficacy in the pathological stage of advanced PCa compared with traditional imaging methods. This review summarizes recent studies on PSMA targeted PET in PCa diagnosis, analyzes its value in PCa diagnosis in detail, and provides new ideas for urological clinicians in PCa diagnosis and clinical management.

Prostate MRI and PSMA-PET in the Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Over the last years, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained a key role in the primary diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). While a negative MRI can avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies and the overdiagnosis of indolent cancers, a positive examination triggers biopsy samples targeted to suspicious imaging findings, thus increasing the diagnosis of csPCa with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of around 90%. The limitations of MRI, including suboptimal positive predictive values, are fueling debate on how to stratify biopsy decisions and management based on patient risk and how to correctly estimate it with clinical and/or imaging findings. In this setting, "next-generation imaging" imaging based on radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is expanding its indications both in the setting of primary staging (intermediate-to-high risk patients) and primary diagnosis (e.g., increasing the sensitivity of MRI or acting as a problem-solving tool for indeterminate MRI cases). This review summarizes the current main evidence on the role of prostate MRI and PSMA-PET as tools for the primary diagnosis of csPCa, and the different possible interaction pathways in this setting.

Comparing the Detection Performance Between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has been promoted as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for prostate biopsy. However, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) including 68 Ga-PSMA-11, 18 F-DCFPyL, and 18 F-PSMA-1007 applied PET/CT imaging was an emerging diagnostic tool in prostate cancer patients for staging or posttreatment follow-up, even early detecting. Many studies have used PSMA PET for comparison with mpMRI to test the diagnostic ability for early prostate cancer. Unfortunately, these studies have shown conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences in diagnostic performance between PSMA PET and mpMRI for detecting and T staging localized prostatic tumors.

METHODS

This meta-analysis involved a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases. The pooling sensitivity and specificity of PSMA and mpMRI verified by pathological analysis were calculated and used to compare the differences between the 2 imaging tools.

RESULTS

Overall, 39 studies were included (3630 patients in total) from 2016 to 2022 in the current meta-analysis and found that the pooling sensitivity values for localized prostatic tumors and T staging T3a and T3b of PSMA PET were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.86), 0.61 (95% CI, 0.39-0.79), and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76), respectively, whereas those of mpMRI were found to be 0.84 (95% 0.78-0.89), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.80), and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.45-0.73), respectively, without significant differences ( P > 0.05). However, in a subgroup analysis of radiotracer, the pooling sensitivity of 18 F-DCFPyL PET was higher than mpMRI (relative risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found that whereas 18 F-DCFPyL PET was superior to mpMRI at detecting localized prostatic tumors, the detection performance of PSMA PET for localized prostatic tumors and T staging was comparable to that of mpMRI.

Clinical advancement of precision theranostics in prostate cancer

Theranostic approaches with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) or PET/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) molecular imaging probes are being implemented clinically in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and imaging-guided precision surgery. This review article provides a comprehensive summary of the rapidly expanding list of molecular imaging probes in this field, including their applications in early diagnosis of primary prostate lesions; detection of lymph node, skeletal and visceral metastases in biochemical relapsed patients; and intraoperative guidance for tumor margin detection and nerve preservation. Although each imaging probe shows preferred efficacy in some applications and limitations in others, the exploration and research efforts in this field will eventually lead to improved precision theranostics of PCa.

Advanced nanomaterial for prostate cancer theranostics

Prostate cancer (PC) has the second highest incidence in men, according to global statistical data. The symptoms of PC in the early stage are not obvious, causing late diagnosis in most patients, which is the cause for missing the optimal treatment time. Thus, highly sensitive and precise early diagnosis methods are very important. Additionally, precise therapy regimens for good targeting and innocuous to the body are indispensable to treat cancer. This review first introduced two diagnosis methods, containing prostate-specific biomarkers detection and molecular imaging. Then, it recommended advanced therapy approaches, such as chemotherapy, gene therapy, and therapeutic nanomaterial. Afterward, we summarized the development of nanomaterial in PC, highlighting the importance of integration of diagnosis and therapy as the future direction against cancer.