1
|
Ge Y, Antiochos P, Steel K, Bingham S, Abdullah S, Chen YY, Mikolich JR, Arai AE, Bandettini WP, Shanbhag SM, Patel AR, Farzaneh-Far A, Heitner JF, Shenoy C, Leung SW, Gonzalez JA, Shah DJ, Raman SV, Ferrari VA, Schulz-Menger J, Stuber M, Simonetti OP, Kwong RY. Prognostic Value of Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13:2132-2145. [PMID: 32771575 PMCID: PMC10823343 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function. BACKGROUND Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy are at risk from both myocardial ischemia and heart failure. Invasive testing is often used as the first-line investigation, and there is limited evidence as to whether stress testing can effectively provide risk stratification. METHODS In this substudy of a multicenter registry from 13 U.S. centers, patients with reduced LV ejection fraction (<50%), referred for stress CMR for suspected myocardial ischemia, were included. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. The secondary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina or congestive heart failure, and unplanned late coronary artery bypass graft surgery. RESULTS Among 582 patients (mean age 62 ± 12 years, 34% women), 40% had a history of congestive heart failure, and the median LV ejection fraction was 39% (interquartile range: 28% to 45%). At median follow-up of 5.0 years, 97 patients had experienced the primary outcome, and 182 patients had experienced the secondary outcome. Patients with no CMR evidence of ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) experienced an annual primary outcome event rate of 1.1%. The presence of ischemia, LGE, or both was associated with higher event rates. In a multivariate model adjusted for clinical covariates, ischemia and LGE were independent predictors of the primary (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68 to 4.14; p < 0.001; and HR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.29; p = 0.03) and secondary (HR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.55 to 2.95; p < 0.001; and HR 1.70; 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.49; p = 0.007) outcomes. The addition of ischemia and LGE led to improved model discrimination for the primary outcome (change in C statistic from 0.715 to 0.765; p = 0.02). The presence and extent of ischemia were associated with higher rates of use of downstream coronary angiography, revascularization, and cost of care spent on ischemia testing. CONCLUSIONS Stress CMR was effective in risk-stratifying patients with reduced LV ejection fractions. (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States [SPINS] Study; NCT03192891).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Ge
- Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Cardiovascular Division of Department of Medicine and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Panagiotis Antiochos
- Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Cardiovascular Division of Department of Medicine and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kevin Steel
- Cardiology Division, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Shuaib Abdullah
- Veteran Administration North Texas Healthcare System, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yi-Yun Chen
- Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Cardiovascular Division of Department of Medicine and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - J Ronald Mikolich
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sharon Regional Health System, Sharon, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew E Arai
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - W Patricia Bandettini
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sujata M Shanbhag
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Amit R Patel
- Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Afshin Farzaneh-Far
- Division of Cardiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John F Heitner
- Division of Cardiology, New York Presbyterian-Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Chetan Shenoy
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Steve W Leung
- Gill Heart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Jorge A Gonzalez
- Division of Cardiology and Radiology, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | - Dipan J Shah
- Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Subha V Raman
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Victor A Ferrari
- Cardiovascular Division, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeanette Schulz-Menger
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, and Helios Clinics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Stuber
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Orlando P Simonetti
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Raymond Y Kwong
- Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Cardiovascular Division of Department of Medicine and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cho JS, Youn HJ, Cho EJ, Her SH, Baek JY, Park MW, Yoon SG, Baeg JU, Park CS, Kim MJ, Jung HO, Jeon HK, Kim JH. Dyssynchrony contributes to false-positive myocardial perfusion SPECT results in patients with stable angina. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY 2011; 12:461-6. [PMID: 21551451 DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM We designed this study to evaluate the possibility that dyssynchrony might lead to false-positive myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion image (MPS) results in stable angina patients. METHODS AND RESULTS This study included 61 patients with both clinically diagnosed stable angina and quantitative MPS results who underwent coronary angiography. The patients were divided into two groups: those who had positive MPS results and normal coronary angiography (Group I, n = 28, 64.05 ± 10.14 years, 11 males and 17 females) and those who had positive MPS results and significant coronary lesions as determined by coronary angiography (Group II, n = 33, 69.2 ± 10.4 years, 14 males and 19 females). The maximal difference in time-to-peak myocardial sustained systolic velocity among all 12 left ventricular (LV) segments (maximal difference in TS) was significantly delayed in Group I as compared with Group II (125.00 ± 46.10 vs. 87.33 ± 40.53 ms, P=0.001). The standard deviation of the time-to-peak myocardial sustained systolic velocity of all 12 LV segments (TS-SD) was also significantly different in the two groups (45.12 ± 19.25 vs. 30.10 ± 15.80 , P=0.002). CONCLUSION Dyssynchrony may be a cause of false-positive quantitative MPS results, even if patients have narrow QRS complexes on ECG. Dyssynchrony index can increase the specificity of quantitative MPS in stable angina patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Sun Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Candell-Riera J, Romero-Farina G, Aguadé-Bruix S, Castell-Conesa J. Ischemic cardiomyopathy: a clinical nuclear cardiology perspective. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009; 62:903-17. [PMID: 19706246 DOI: 10.1016/s1885-5857(09)72655-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Ischemic cardiomyopathy results from severe extensive coronary artery disease, which is associated with left ventricular dysfunction and also, in many cases, with significant left ventricular dilatation. Mortality is high, especially in patients who satisfy myocardial viability criteria but who have not undergone revascularization. Although age, exercise capacity and comorbidity influence survival, the most important prognostic factors are the extent of the ischemia, myocardial viability and left ventricular remodeling, all of which can be successfully evaluated by gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaume Candell-Riera
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|