1
|
Yue JY, Ji K, Liu HP, Wu QW, Liang CH, Gao JB. Evaluating the consistency in different methods for measuring left atrium diameters. BMC Med Imaging 2024; 24:57. [PMID: 38443826 PMCID: PMC10916282 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01231-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The morphological information of the pulmonary vein (PV) and left atrium (LA) is of immense clinical importance for effective atrial fibrillation ablation. The aim of this study is to examine the consistency in different LA diameter measurement techniques. METHODS Retrospective imaging data from 87 patients diagnosed with PV computed tomography angiography were included. The patients consisted of 50 males and 37 females, with an average age of (60.74 ± 8.70) years. Two physicians independently measured the anteroposterior diameter, long diameter, and transverse diameter of the LA using six different methods. Additionally, we recorded the post-processing time of the images. Physician 1 conducted measurements twice with a one-month interval between the measurements to assess intra-rater reliability. Using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the consistency of each LA diameter measurement by the two physicians was evaluated. We compared the differences in the LA diameter and the time consumed for measurements using different methods. This was done by employing the rank sum test of a randomized block design (Friedman M test) and the q test for pairwise comparisons among multiple relevant samples. RESULTS (1) The consistency of the measured LA diameter by the two physicians was strong or very strong. (2) There were statistical differences in the anteroposterior diameter, long diameter, and transverse diameter of LA assessed using different methods (χ2 = 222.28, 32.74, 293.83, P < 0.001). (3) Different methods for measuring the diameters of LA required different amounts of time (χ2 = 333.10, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The results of left atrium (LA) diameter measurements conducted by different physicians were found to be reliable. However, the LA diameters obtained through various techniques exhibited variations. It was observed that measuring LA long diameters using only the VR (volume rendering) picture was the most clinically applicable method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Yan Yue
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui Henan Province, 453200, Xinxiang, China
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road, Erqi District, 450000, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
- Heart Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, 453200, Henan Pro vince, Weihui, China
| | - Kai Ji
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui Henan Province, 453200, Xinxiang, China
| | - Hai-Peng Liu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui Henan Province, 453200, Xinxiang, China
| | - Qing-Wu Wu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui Henan Province, 453200, Xinxiang, China
| | - Chang-Hua Liang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui Henan Province, 453200, Xinxiang, China
| | - Jian-Bo Gao
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road, Erqi District, 450000, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roney CH, Sim I, Yu J, Beach M, Mehta A, Alonso Solis-Lemus J, Kotadia I, Whitaker J, Corrado C, Razeghi O, Vigmond E, Narayan SM, O’Neill M, Williams SE, Niederer SA. Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence by Combining Population Data and Virtual Cohorts of Patient-Specific Left Atrial Models. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2022; 15:e010253. [PMID: 35089057 PMCID: PMC8845531 DOI: 10.1161/circep.121.010253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation is suboptimal, and long-term response is challenging to predict. Clinical trials identify bedside properties that provide only modest prediction of long-term response in populations, while patient-specific models in small cohorts primarily explain acute response to ablation. We aimed to predict long-term atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation in large cohorts, by using machine learning to complement biophysical simulations by encoding more interindividual variability. METHODS Patient-specific models were constructed for 100 atrial fibrillation patients (43 paroxysmal, 41 persistent, and 16 long-standing persistent), undergoing first ablation. Patients were followed for 1 year using ambulatory ECG monitoring. Each patient-specific biophysical model combined differing fibrosis patterns, fiber orientation maps, electrical properties, and ablation patterns to capture uncertainty in atrial properties and to test the ability of the tissue to sustain fibrillation. These simulation stress tests of different model variants were postprocessed to calculate atrial fibrillation simulation metrics. Machine learning classifiers were trained to predict atrial fibrillation recurrence using features from the patient history, imaging, and atrial fibrillation simulation metrics. RESULTS We performed 1100 atrial fibrillation ablation simulations across 100 patient-specific models. Models based on simulation stress tests alone showed a maximum accuracy of 0.63 for predicting long-term fibrillation recurrence. Classifiers trained to history, imaging, and simulation stress tests (average 10-fold cross-validation area under the curve, 0.85±0.09; recall, 0.80±0.13; precision, 0.74±0.13) outperformed those trained to history and imaging (area under the curve, 0.66±0.17) or history alone (area under the curve, 0.61±0.14). CONCLUSION A novel computational pipeline accurately predicted long-term atrial fibrillation recurrence in individual patients by combining outcome data with patient-specific acute simulation response. This technique could help to personalize selection for atrial fibrillation ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline H. Roney
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
- School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom (C.H.R.)
| | - Iain Sim
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
| | - Jin Yu
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
| | - Marianne Beach
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
| | - Arihant Mehta
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
| | - Jose Alonso Solis-Lemus
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
| | - Irum Kotadia
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
| | - John Whitaker
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
- The Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA (J.W.)
| | - Cesare Corrado
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
| | - Orod Razeghi
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
| | - Edward Vigmond
- IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, France (E.V.)
- Univ. Bordeaux, IMB, UMR 5251, F-33400 Talence, France (E.V.)
| | - Sanjiv M. Narayan
- Department of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (S.M.N.)
| | - Mark O’Neill
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
| | - Steven E. Williams
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh (S.E.W.)
| | - Steven A. Niederer
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roney CH, Sillett C, Whitaker J, Lemus JAS, Sim I, Kotadia I, O'Neill M, Williams SE, Niederer SA. Applications of multimodality imaging for left atrial catheter ablation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 23:31-41. [PMID: 34747450 PMCID: PMC8685603 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Atrial arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, may be treated through catheter ablation. The process of atrial arrhythmia catheter ablation, which includes patient selection, pre-procedural planning, intra-procedural guidance, and post-procedural assessment, is typically characterized by the use of several imaging modalities to sequentially inform key clinical decisions. Increasingly, advanced imaging modalities are processed via specialized image analysis techniques and combined with intra-procedural electrical measurements to inform treatment approaches. Here, we review the use of multimodality imaging for left atrial ablation procedures. The article first outlines how imaging modalities are routinely used in the peri-ablation period. We then describe how advanced imaging techniques may inform patient selection for ablation and ablation targets themselves. Ongoing research directions for improving catheter ablation outcomes by using imaging combined with advanced analyses for personalization of ablation targets are discussed, together with approaches for their integration in the standard clinical environment. Finally, we describe future research areas with the potential to improve catheter ablation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline H Roney
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - Charles Sillett
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - John Whitaker
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | | | - Iain Sim
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - Irum Kotadia
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - Mark O'Neill
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - Steven E Williams
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Steven A Niederer
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Firouznia M, Feeny AK, LaBarbera MA, McHale M, Cantlay C, Kalfas N, Schoenhagen P, Saliba W, Tchou P, Barnard J, Chung MK, Madabhushi A. Machine Learning-Derived Fractal Features of Shape and Texture of the Left Atrium and Pulmonary Veins From Cardiac Computed Tomography Scans Are Associated With Risk of Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation Postablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2021; 14:e009265. [PMID: 33576688 PMCID: PMC8015207 DOI: 10.1161/circep.120.009265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
[Figure: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Albert K. Feeny
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve Univ
| | | | - Meghan McHale
- Dept of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland, OH
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Catherine Cantlay
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Natalie Kalfas
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Paul Schoenhagen
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve Univ
- Dept of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland, OH
- Imaging Institute, Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Walid Saliba
- Dept of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Patrick Tchou
- Dept of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - John Barnard
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Mina K Chung
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve Univ
- Dept of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland, OH
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Dept of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve Univ
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|