Humanitarian Activities of Interplast Turkiye: 6 Years of Experience in Uzbekistan for Surgical Treatment of Cleft Patients and Related Secondary Deformities

Outcomes of Short-Term Surgical Trips in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to explore the current body of literature to characterize how short-term surgical trips (STSTs) in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OtoHNS) contribute to surgical, educational, and sustainability-based outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aim to use these data to synthesize aspects of STSTs that are successful with the hopes of shaping future global efforts.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources included Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus.

REVIEW METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on several databases from inception to October 14, 2021. We included primary studies exploring any surgical or educational outcomes of global short-term surgical endeavors within LMICs. Data were then extracted to evaluate the heterogenous body of literature that exists, characterizing the surgical, educational, and sustainability-based outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-Seven studies were included in the final analysis. Most publications were focused on surgical interventions (39 of 47; 82.9%); 13 (27.7%) studies included education as the primary aim and 12 (25.5%) considered sustainability a significant aim. Of the 94 first and last authors, there were zero first authors and only one last author with an LMIC affiliation. Twenty-six studies (55%) mentioned that any patients were seen in follow-up, ranging from one day to five years.

CONCLUSION

Our scoping review demonstrates that most STSTs have focused primarily on surgical procedures with a lack of appropriate long-term follow-up. However, the available outcome-based information presented helps identify factors that characterize a strong short-term global surgical program.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 134:32-39, 2024.

INTERPLAST-Germany-adapting to global plastic surgery

Background

INTERPLAST, Inc. was founded in 1969 by plastic surgeons in Stanford, CA, to create a financial basis through donations to operate foreign patients at Stanford or send surgical teams to developing countries. With the same financial effort, 50 to 100 times more patients can be operated on locally than in a hospital at home. Stanford's example was appealing to many plastic surgeons worldwide, who founded similar INTERPLAST NGOs in their own countries.

Methods

A literature review revealed worldwide humanitarian actions of INTERPLAST teams, whose annual effectiveness is comparable to the operation numbers of large plastic surgery departments. Six patients with complex facial deformities requiring multiple surgical interventions were selected for temporary stay and operations in Germany.

Results

Repeated missions at the same hospitals with training of local surgeons have increased significantly compared to earlier "parachute missions." Microsurgical procedures for free flaps with magnifying glasses are now possible for the experienced even in hospitals in developing countries. The most efficient medical aid in the future will be the expansion and establishment of departments or hospitals in developing countries supported or maintained by partner hospitals in our home country.

Conclusions

Operations of humanitarian plastic surgeons in developing countries are becoming increasingly difficult. Local health authorities require temporary surgical permits, customs offices try to clear surgical material and look at expiration dates of medicines, and pandemics complicate planning of INTERPLAST missions. It therefore seems increasingly necessary to go as single teacher, training engaged local surgeons and assisting operations. The alternative is inviting local surgeons to Western hospitals and introducing them to the basic skills of plastic surgery and empathy with the poor. However, the lack of recognition of medical degrees from all developing countries remains a problem for their training in Europe.Level of evidence: Level V, risk/prognostic.

SaveSmile: an annual cleft repair mission in Sudan

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are often burdened by disease, beyond the scope of their healthcare capabilities. Sudan, in particular, lacks the resources and expertise to surgically repair orofacial clefts. This paper highlights Sudan’s need for medical aid from other countries and outside organizations and the procedures by which they collaborate with local entities to provide relief to those affected by cleft in Sudan. Additionally, this study reports on the prevalence of type of cleft lip and palate as well as rates and explanations of surgical complications over a period of 10 years and the short and long-term benefits to society. Paper copies of patient data was digitalized and run through statistical programs to look for patterns of demographics and diagnoses. Most patients were male, under four years old, and had a cleft lip.

Validity and reliability of the Family Empowerment Scale for parents of children with cleft lip and/or palate

BACKGROUND

Empowerment is recognized as a crucial concept in strengthening the position of parents in healthcare services. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish Family Empowerment Scale (FES).

METHODS

This methodological study was conducted between January and March 2021, with 348 family members actively caring for their children in the age group of 0-18 years with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). The English FES was translated into Turkish using back translation and modified so that it is generic and convenient for all families. The construct validity, internal validity, internal consistency, and split-half test reliability and responsiveness of the Turkish FES were examined.

RESULTS

The original FES structure with three factors (family, health services provided to the child and community participation) and 34 items was verified in Turkish culture. This obtained structure can explain 66% of the variance of the relevant concept. Scores of parents ranged between 34 and 170 points. Increasing scores indicated a positive significance regarding family empowerment. The Cronbach's α reliability coefficient of the scale was calculated as 0.976.

CONCLUSION

The study findings and the goodness-of-fit values indicated that the FES and its Turkish version are a valid and reliable measurement instrument to be used in Turkish culture.

The Impact of Middle Eastern Crisis on Cleft Care: Evaluation of Demographic and Perioperative Data in Syrian Refugees With Cleft Lip and Palate

The cleft lip and palate (CL/P) define a heterogeneous group of congenital deformities, which are morphologically highly diverse, with a complex and multifactorial etiology. Affected children may experience social problems due to negative effects on speech, hearing, facial appearance, as well as negative psychological effects on the parents. In 2011, after the civil war began in Syria, a great wave of immigration began to Turkey and other neighboring countries. Refugees may not be able to receive optimal health care because of cultural differences, socioeconomic status, language problems, and psychosocial problems. To increase awareness about this issue, the authors investigated the demographic, perioperative, and post-operative data of Syrian refugee patients with CL/P who were admitted to our cleft center between January 2016 and May 2019. Sixty-eight refugees with CL/P were detected as the result of the screening. Unlike the protocol the authors follow in our center, cleft lip repair was performed at an average of 7.6 months and cleft palate repair was performed at an average of 28.7 months of age. The rate of fistula was found 26.2%.The civil war in Syria has caused the repair of the patients with cleft lip and palate at a later age, hampered the follow-up and treatment, and caused more complications. Considering the demographic, social, economic and cultural characteristics of the patients, it was demonstrated that the necessary health precautions and infrastructure should be provided on the pillar of plastic surgery.

Impact of short-term reconstructive surgical missions: a systematic review

Introduction

Short-term missions providing patients in low-income countries with reconstructive surgery are often criticised because evidence of their value is lacking. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of short-term reconstructive surgical missions in low-income and middle-income countries.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched five medical databases from inception up to 2 July 2018. Original studies of short-term reconstructive surgical missions were included, which reported data on patient safety measurements, health gains of individual patients and sustainability. Data were combined to generate overall outcomes, including overall complication rates.

Results

Of 1662 identified studies, 41 met full inclusion criteria, which included 48 546 patients. The overall study quality according to Oxford CEBM and GRADE was low. Ten studies reported a minimum of 6 months’ follow-up, showing a follow-up rate of 56.0% and a complication rate of 22.3%. Twelve studies that did not report on duration or follow-up rate reported a complication rate of 1.2%. Fifteen out of 20 studies (75%) that reported on follow-up also reported on sustainable characteristics.

Conclusions

Evidence on the patient outcomes of reconstructive surgical missions is scarce and of limited quality. Higher complication rates were reported in studies which explicitly mentioned the duration and rate of follow-up. Studies with a low follow-up quality might be under-reporting complication rates and overestimating the positive impact of missions. This review indicates that missions should develop towards sustainable partnerships. These partnerships should provide quality aftercare, perform outcome research and build the surgical capacity of local healthcare systems.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42018099285.