Long-Term Outcomes of Arm Replantation

A Nationwide Analysis on Major Upper Extremity Amputations and Replantations

BACKGROUND

The loss of an upper extremity is a severely disabling condition made medically challenging by the limited window for replantation. This study aims to investigate the burden of traumatic major upper extremity amputations in the United States and uncover possibilities for improvements in treatment.

METHODS

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample was screened for International Classification of Diseases-9/10 diagnosis/procedure codes for traumatic and nontraumatic major upper extremity amputations and replantations within the years 2008 to 2017. The resulting pool of cases was analyzed for multiple variables, including level of injury, patient demographics, hospital type and location, length of stay, costs, comorbidities, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 15 155 major upper extremity amputations were recorded, of which 15.20% (n = 2305) were traumatic amputations-almost half of them related to the upper arm (49.6%; P = .0002). The great majority of replantations, however, was conducted at the lower arm level (87.4%; P < .0001), with an overall replantation rate of 22.3%. Nontraumatic amputations were overall associated with significantly higher burden of comorbidities relative to traumatic amputations except for long-term alcohol use (P < .0001). Both, amputations and replantations, were predominantly treated in large urban teaching hospitals, and were significantly more likely to occur in white men. The Southern region of the United States was handling the highest proportion of amputations in the United States, but had the lowest likelihood of replantation.

CONCLUSION

This study provides an overview of the national trends in major traumatic upper extremity amputations and replantations, revealing potential health care shortcomings.

Patient-reported significant disability after major traumatic upper extremity amputation

The aims of this study were to record patient-reported outcomes of treatment of proximal upper extremity amputation injuries and subsequent return to work. A consecutive cohort of 38 patients with a traumatic amputation at or proximal to the carpus had been treated with a replantation or revision (completion) amputation in Tampere University Hospital between 2009 and 2019, and 31 of them participated in this study. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH). Patients reported significant disability indicated by DASH score after replantation (median 30; interquartile range [IQR] 21-47) and revision (completion) amputation (median 33; IQR 16-52). Most patients had cold intolerance and reported low hand function and aesthetics scores. Out of 17 working patients, 10 did not return to their previous work. Our study demonstrates the influence of major upper extremity amputation on daily life activities, even after a successful replantation.Level of evidence: IV.

Forequarter Replantation

Traumatic forequarter amputations are rare injuries in which the arm, clavicle, scapula, and proximal shoulder muscles are avulsed from the body. Historically, forequarter amputation has been treated with hemorrhage control, wound debridement, and soft tissue coverage. To our knowledge, successful forequarter replantation has not been previously reported. We present a rare case of forequarter amputation treated successfully with replantation. At the 4.5-year follow-up after replantation, the patient had antigravity elbow flexion, modest shoulder elevation, modest extrinsic finger function, and crude sensation. We discuss relevant technical considerations that indicate that, despite challenges, forequarter replantation can be achieved with success.

Corrective Tendon Repair with Local Anesthesia following Wrist-level Replantation

Wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet has become a popular method to ensure correct tendon condition intraoperatively. We report the case of a 17-year-old man who underwent nearly total left wrist amputation and successful replantation. The misconnection of flexor tendons between the thumb, index, and middle finger was found postoperatively. At 1.5 months postreplantation, simultaneous tenolysis and corrective tendon repair were performed under local anesthesia. The proximal tendon origins were confirmed intraoperatively with the patient awake. Six months after replantation, the patient underwent extensor pollicis longus tendon shortening and pulley reconstruction under wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet for thumb extension lag. After adequate rehabilitation, the functional outcome was satisfactory. This case report demonstrates that local anesthesia is a judicious method to intraoperatively facilitate correct tendon repair, tension adjustment, and direct conversation between the surgeon and the patient.