Calcium Channel Blockers Reduce the Effects of Cigarette Smoking on Peripheral Nerve Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Associated with Foot Ulcer: One of a Kind

Significance: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) associated with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is likely to be complicated with critical factors such as biofilm infection and compromised skin barrier function of the diabetic skin. Repaired skin with a history of biofilm infection is known to be compromised in barrier function. Loss of barrier function is also observed in the oxidative stress affected diabetic and aged skin. Recent Advances: Loss of barrier function makes the skin prone to biofilm infection and cellulitis, which contributes to chronic inflammation and vasculopathy. Hyperglycemia favors biofilm formation as glucose lowering led to reduction in biofilm development. While vasculopathy limits oxygen supply, the O2 cost of inflammation is high increasing hypoxia severity. Critical Issues: The host nervous system can be inhabited by bacteria. Because electrical impulses are a part of microbial physiology, polymicrobial colonization of the host's neural circuit is likely to influence transmission of action potential. The identification of perineural apatite in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy suggests bacterial involvement. DPN starts in both feet at the same time. Future Directions: Pair-matched studies of DPN in the foot affected with DFU (i.e., DFU-DPN) compared with DPN in the without ulcer, and intact skin barrier function, are likely to provide critical insight that would help inform effective care strategies. This review characterizes DFU-DPN from a translational science point of view presenting a new paradigm that recognizes the current literature in the context of factors that are unique to DFU-DPN.

Failed Acellular Nerve Allografts: A Critical Review

BACKGROUND

Acellular nerve allograft (ANA) occupies an increasingly prominent role in the treatment of peripheral nerve reconstruction. There is demonstrable efficacy; however, some grafts fail to support axonal regrowth and the reasons for this are unclear. This study examines the ANA experience in a specialized peripheral nerve surgery department to discuss the clinical and histological findings in failed cases.

METHOD

Failed ANA grafts were identified from a prospective database using Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) S3 and M3 as thresholds for success. Cases in which ANA grafting was indicated for nerve related pain and dysesthesia but where no subjective improvement in symptoms occurred were also included. Patients requiring revision surgery after ANA grafting were also considered failures. Cases were then examined in conjunction with a literature review to identify possible mechanisms of failure, including detailed histological analysis in 2 cases.

RESULTS

Eight failed procedures were identified from a database of 99 separate allograft records on 74 patients. This included procedures for 2 tibial nerves, 2 superficial radial nerves, 2 median nerves, 1 digital nerve and a lateral cord brachial plexus injury (male/female, 5:3; age range, 24-54 years). Allograft length range 25 to 120 mm. One postoperative infection was identified. Histological findings in 2 cases included adequate vascularization of allograft material without subsequent axonal regeneration, a reduction of large myelinated fibers proximal to a tibial nerve allograft in the setting of a chronic injury, and a preference for small rather than large fiber regeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

This article reports instances of ANA graft failure in a variety of contexts, for which the primary reasons for failure remain unclear. The etiology is likely to be multifactorial with both patient, graft and surgeon factors contributing to failure. Further clinical and histological analysis of ANA failures will improve our understanding of the mechanisms of graft failure.