One-Stage Cleft Lip and Palate Repair in an Older Population

Outcomes of Short-Term Surgical Trips in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to explore the current body of literature to characterize how short-term surgical trips (STSTs) in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OtoHNS) contribute to surgical, educational, and sustainability-based outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aim to use these data to synthesize aspects of STSTs that are successful with the hopes of shaping future global efforts.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources included Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus.

REVIEW METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on several databases from inception to October 14, 2021. We included primary studies exploring any surgical or educational outcomes of global short-term surgical endeavors within LMICs. Data were then extracted to evaluate the heterogenous body of literature that exists, characterizing the surgical, educational, and sustainability-based outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-Seven studies were included in the final analysis. Most publications were focused on surgical interventions (39 of 47; 82.9%); 13 (27.7%) studies included education as the primary aim and 12 (25.5%) considered sustainability a significant aim. Of the 94 first and last authors, there were zero first authors and only one last author with an LMIC affiliation. Twenty-six studies (55%) mentioned that any patients were seen in follow-up, ranging from one day to five years.

CONCLUSION

Our scoping review demonstrates that most STSTs have focused primarily on surgical procedures with a lack of appropriate long-term follow-up. However, the available outcome-based information presented helps identify factors that characterize a strong short-term global surgical program.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 134:32-39, 2024.

Single Stage Cleft Lip and Palate Repair In Toddlers: Retrospective Review of Feasibility and Operative Experience

In children with cleft lip and palate (CLP), we aimed to compare a single-stage surgery group or all in one (AIO) approach with a 2-stage surgery group (2-SSG) of 18 and 12 toddlers, respectively. A retrospective review of 30 patients with CLP was conducted between 2007 and 2019. All in one procedure was performed at 12 to 24 months and 2-SSG patients had lip and primary nasal correction at 3 to 9 months, followed by palatoplasty and myringotomies at 12 to 16 months. In the AIO group, 13 (72.2%) patients had unilateral CLP, while 5 (27.8%) had bilateral CLP, which is comparable to the 2-SSG who had 8 (66.7%) unilateral CLP, 3 (25%) bilateral CLP, and 1 (8.3%) incomplete CL with submucous CP. The 2-SSG had a 30 minutes longer cumulative operative time and increased blood loss that was not statistically significant (P = 0.149 and 0.219, respectively). The AIO group had a slightly longer intubation (0.67 versus 0.33 day) and pediatric intensive care unit admission duration of 1.72 versus 1.67 days, (P = 0.427, 0.927), respectively. Total hospitalization time was significantly shorter with the AIO (8 versus 10.67 days, P = 0.016). The duration of postoperative pediatric intensive care unit and need for supplemental oxygen were higher in the AIO (38.9% versus 8.3%, P = 0.064). The “AIO” approach of lip, nasal, and palate surgery from 12 to 24 months completes early surgical care in a single operation. However, based on our review, this protocol must be selective; children with comorbidities or syndromes are advised to be exempted and operated in stages.

Continuous circular closure in unilateral cleft lip and plate repair in one surgery

The study aims at assessing wound healing and safety of single-stage two-layers continuous closure in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). In this retrospective, descriptive cohort study, we assessed wound healing without fistula formation at 1, 3, and 6 months after a single-stage two-layer UCLP repair, in which the midline suture is continuously circular all along the oral and nasal sides. We examined lengths of hospital stay and the incidence of intra- and postoperative adverse events. Furthermore, we compared the cleft width at birth and on the day of surgery, after presurgical orthopaedics. Eleven UCLP patients underwent one cleft surgery between July 2016 and June 2018 at the age of 8-9 months. Full primary healing occurred in all patients without fistulas. Median length of post-operative hospital stay was 5 days (range = 4-9 days). No intra- or postoperative adverse events above Grade I (according to ClassIntra and Clavien-Dindo, respectively) occurred. Median and interquartile range (IQR) of the palatal cleft width decreased significantly from birth to surgery, i.e., from 12.0 mm (10.8-13.6 mm) to 5.0 mm (4.0-7.5 mm) anteriorly and from 14.0 mm (11.5-15.0 mm) to 7.3 mm (6.0-8.5 mm) posteriorly (p = 0.0033 in both cases). Given these preliminary results, the concept of single-stage continuous circular closure in UCLP has potential for further investigation. However, it remains to be proven that there are no relevant adverse effects such as inhibition of maxillary growth. Registered in clinicaltrials.gov:NCT04108416.

Anesthetic Exposure in Staged Versus Single-Stage Cleft Lip and Palate Repair: Can We Reduce Risk of Anesthesia-Induced Developmental Neurotoxicity?

ABSTRACT

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) repair is typically performed in a staged fashion, which requires multiple instances of anesthetic exposure during a critical period of infant neurodevelopment. One solution to this concern includes the implementation of a single-stage CLP repair performed between 6 and 12 months of age. This study aimed to compare total anesthetic exposure between single-stage and staged CLP repairs. A retrospective review of unilateral CLP repairs between 2013 and 2018 conducted at a single institution was performed. Patients underwent either traditional, staged lip and palate repair, or single-stage complete cleft repair, where palate, lip, alveolus, and nasal repair was performed simultaneously. Primary endpoints included: total surgical time and total anesthetic exposure. Secondary endpoints included: excess anesthesia time, recovery room time, length of stay, and type of anesthetic administered. Two hundred twenty-five (n = 225) unilateral CLP repairs were conducted at the Loma Linda University. Detailed anesthetic data for eighty-six (n = 86) single-stage and twenty-eight (n = 28) staged operations were available. There was a statistically significant decrease in anesthetic exposure in single-stage versus staged repairs (316 minutes versus 345 minutes, P = 0.017), despite similar procedure times (260 minutes versus 246 minutes, P = 0.224). This resulted in near double excess anesthetic exposure time in the staged group (98 minutes versus 56 minutes, P < 0.001), primarily occurring during induction. This analysis suggests that single-stage CLP repair can reduce wasted time under general anesthesia and potentially reduce harmful neuronal toxicity in the developmental period in this at-risk population.

Cost Utility Analysis of Staged Versus Single-Stage Cleft Lip and Palate Repair

PURPOSE

As one of the most common congenital craniofacial deformities, cleft lip and palate repair is a complex and much published topic. Proper treatment can require a multitude of appointments and operations and can place a significant burden on both the patients' families and the health care system itself. One proposed solution has been to combine multiple cleft procedures. However, these more complex operations have drawn concerns from institutions and providers regarding increased cost. This study provides a cost utility analysis between single-stage and staged unilateral cleft lip and palate repairs.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted via current procedural terminology code identification of all cleft-related operations performed between 2013 and 2018. Patients were screened according to diagnosis, and only analysis on unilateral cleft lip and palate patients was performed. Patients were split into 2 cohorts: those that underwent a single-stage complete cleft repair, which includes palate, lip, alveolus, and nasal repair-termed "PLAN" at our institution, and those that underwent more traditional staged lip and palate repairs. Demographic and billing data were collected for any procedure performed between patient ages 0 and 24 months. χ, t-tests, and parametric regression analyses were performed to compare the cohorts.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2018, 968 (n = 968) cleft-related operations were conducted at Loma Linda University Children's Hospital. Seven hundred ninety-six (n = 796) noncleft lip/palate repairs and 38 (n = 38) bilateral cleft lip repairs were excluded. Of the remaining 135 (n = 135) patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, detailed cost data were available for 86 single-stage and 28 staged repairs. The average combined total cost for single-stage repairs was US $80,405 compared with US $109,473 for staged repairs (P < 0.001). The average total intraoperative cost for single-stage repairs was US $60,683 versus US $79,739 for staged repairs (P < 0.001), and the average total postoperative cost for single-stage repairs versus staged repairs was US $19,776 and US $29,703, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that single-stage PLAN repair, provides an effective, cost-efficient solution to unilateral cleft lip and palate care, reducing burden on patients' families and the health care system at large.

The Association Between Age at Palatoplasty and Speech and Language Outcomes in Children With Cleft Palate: An Observational Chart Review Study

Objective:

To determine whether timing of palatoplasty (early, standard, or late) is associated with speech and language outcomes in children with cleft palate.

Design:

Retrospective case series.

Setting:

Tertiary care children’s hospital.

Participants:

Records from 733 children born between 2005 and 2015 and treated at the Cleft Craniofacial Clinic of a tertiary children’s hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria were cleft repair at an outside hospital, intact secondary palate, absence of postpalatoplasty speech evaluation, syndromes, staged palatoplasty, and introduction to clinic after 12 months of age. Data from 232 children with cleft palate ± cleft lip were analyzed.

Interventions:

Palatoplasty.

Main Outcome Measures:

Speech/language delays and disorders at 20 months and 5 years of age based on formal hospital or community-based testing or screening evaluation in the Cleft Craniofacial Clinic; additional speech surgery.

Results:

Median age at palatoplasty was 12.6 months (range: 8.8-21.9 months). Age at palatoplasty was classified as early (<11 months, n = 28), standard (11-13 months, n = 158), or late (>13 months, n = 46). Late palatoplasty was associated with increased odds of speech/language delays and speech therapy at 20 months, and language delays at 5 years, compared with standard or early palatoplasty ( P < .05 for all comparisons). However, speech sound production disorders, velopharyngeal incompetence, tube replacement, and hearing loss were not significantly associated with age at palatoplasty.

Conclusions:

Late palatoplasty may be associated with short- and long-term delays in speech/language development. Future studies with standardized surgical technique/timing and outcome measures are required to more definitively describe the impact of age at palatoplasty on speech/language development.

Impact of short-term reconstructive surgical missions: a systematic review

Introduction

Short-term missions providing patients in low-income countries with reconstructive surgery are often criticised because evidence of their value is lacking. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of short-term reconstructive surgical missions in low-income and middle-income countries.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched five medical databases from inception up to 2 July 2018. Original studies of short-term reconstructive surgical missions were included, which reported data on patient safety measurements, health gains of individual patients and sustainability. Data were combined to generate overall outcomes, including overall complication rates.

Results

Of 1662 identified studies, 41 met full inclusion criteria, which included 48 546 patients. The overall study quality according to Oxford CEBM and GRADE was low. Ten studies reported a minimum of 6 months’ follow-up, showing a follow-up rate of 56.0% and a complication rate of 22.3%. Twelve studies that did not report on duration or follow-up rate reported a complication rate of 1.2%. Fifteen out of 20 studies (75%) that reported on follow-up also reported on sustainable characteristics.

Conclusions

Evidence on the patient outcomes of reconstructive surgical missions is scarce and of limited quality. Higher complication rates were reported in studies which explicitly mentioned the duration and rate of follow-up. Studies with a low follow-up quality might be under-reporting complication rates and overestimating the positive impact of missions. This review indicates that missions should develop towards sustainable partnerships. These partnerships should provide quality aftercare, perform outcome research and build the surgical capacity of local healthcare systems.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42018099285.

Contribution of the Use of a Pen-Type Endoscope to Evaluate and Treat Ears Simultaneously During Cleft Palate Surgery in Late Presented Cases

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of secretory otitis media is very high among the nonoperated cleft palate patients.

METHODS

Ninety-one cleft palate operations were performed on late presented cases in Sudan, Africa. The surgeries were performed according to the Veau-Wardill-Kilner push-back technique. A laptop connected pen-type endoscopic camera was used to evaluate the tympanic membrane and address middle ear disease in all patients simultaneously. The procedure was performed after removing wax from the external auditory canal. A small incision was made with a myringotomy knife through the layers of the tympanic membrane if any sign of fluid collection was observed, after which the middle ear effusion was evacuated and the ventilation tube was inserted.

RESULTS

This procedure was undertaken in 182 ears; 41 ears (22.5%) were healthy, 19 ears (10.5%) had chronic perforations, 122 ears (67%) underwent myringotomy procedures, and 54 (44.2%) were treated by inserting a ventilation tube. Despite the challenging work environment, standard monitoring facilities were available and all operations were completed with no early complications.

CONCLUSION

The pen-type camera instead of an operating microscope was a tremendous contribution, as it was easy to handle and contributed to the good outcomes. The use of this technique is strongly recommended in surgical camps.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.