A Simple Method of Neonatal Ear Molding for Treatment of Stahl Ear Deformity

Correction of congenital auricle deformities with ear mould: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of ear moulds for congenital auricle deformities.

METHODS

Databases including Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM) and Web of Science were systematically reviewed. Randomised controlled trials (RCT), non-randomised control trials (non-RCT), quasi-randomised control trials (quasi-RCT) and self-controlled before-after trials were also included. Data extraction was independently conducted by two authors. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBIN-I) was used to evaluate the risk bias. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and chi-square tests. Effective rate, adverse reaction rate and their 95%CI were calculated. Funnel plots, Begg's test as well as sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The analysis encompassed ten studies, comprising one RCT and nine self-controlled before-after trials, involving 1860 ears (1248 children). The pooled effective rate and adverse reaction rate of ear mould were 91% (95% CI: 0.87-0.94) and 9% (95%CI: 0.02-0.17), respectively. No serious adverse reactions were reported. The effective rate of ear mould intervention showed no significant difference between age at correction≤42 days group (90%, 95%CI: 0.85-0.94) and that >42 days group (93%, 95%CI: 0.83-0.99). Similarly, there was no statistical difference in the correction efficiency between duration of wearing ear mould≤30 days group (90%, 95%CI: 0.85-0.94) and that >30 days group (92%, 95%CI: 0.86-0.96). The effective rate for correcting cryptotia ear (98%, P < 0.001), cup ear (93%, P = 0.004) and prominent ear (90%, P = 0.014) was higher than that of helical rim deformity (66%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the short term, the use of ear moulds is effective and safe in correcting congenital auricle deformities. Notably, the correction efficacy for cryptotia, cup ear and prominent ear deformities surpasses that of helical rim deformities. However, further research is required to ascertain the impact of the duration of wearing on the correction of congenital auricle deformities.

Analysis of the effect and influencing factors of EarWell auricle orthosis in the treatment of congenital auricle deformity in children

OBJECTIVE

To observe the efficacy of EarWell ear orthosis in treating children with different types of ear deformities.

METHODS

We selected 80 children aged <6 weeks with ear deformities (110 ears: 15, 30, 21, 25, and 19 ears with prominent ear, lop ear, cup ear, cryptotia, and helical rim deformity, respectively). Differences in effectiveness rate, treatment time, and incidence of complications among children with different types of auricular deformities were compared. Recurrence rates at 1 and 3 months after the treatment were compared.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 92.73 %, and the treatment effectiveness rate did not differ significantly among the children with different types of auricular malformations (P > 0.05). The correction time of the helical rim deformity was the shortest, and the correction times of the prominent and cup ears were significantly longer than those of the other groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications associated with helical rim deformity and lop ear was lower, and the incidence of prominent and cup ear complications was significantly higher than that in the other groups (P < 0.05). The recurrence rate in children with prominent and cup ears was higher at 1 and 3 months after correction, and children with a lop ear and cryptotia showed no recurrence at 1 and 3 months after treatment, which correlated with the correction time, incidence of complications, and recurrence rate (P < 0.05) CONCLUSION: The EarWell auricle orthosis is an effective treatment in children with auricular morphological malformations. Correction time, complication rate, and recurrence rate were related to the malformation type.

Evolution of Anomaly-Specific Techniques in Infant Ear Molding: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Congenital ear anomalies occur in at least one-third of the population, and less than one-third of cases self-correct. Ear molding is a nonoperative alternative to surgery that spares operative morbidity and allows for significantly earlier intervention. In this retrospective study, the senior author developed a tailored approach to each specific type of ear deformity. The use of modifications to adapt standard ear molding techniques for each unique ear are described.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective, institutional review board-approved study of 246 patients who underwent ear molding by a single surgeon. The procedure reports for each case were reviewed to develop step-wise customization protocols for existing EarWellTM and InfantEarTM systems.

RESULTS

This review included 385 ears in 246 patients. Patient age at presentation ranged from less than 1 week to 22 weeks. Presenting ear deformities were subclassified into mixed (37.4%), helical rim (28.5%), prominent (10.6%), lidding/lop (9.3%), Stahl's ear (3.6%), conchal crus (3.3%), and cupping (2.8%). Two patients (0.8%) had cryptotia. Deformity subclass could not be obtained for 11 patients (4.5%). Recommended modifications to existing ear correction systems are deformity-specific: cotton tip applicator (CTA)/setting material (Stahl's ear), custom dental compound mold (lidding/lop and cupping), scaphal wire (helical rim), CTA/protrusion excision (prominent), and custom dental compound stent (conchal crus).

CONCLUSIONS

Presentation of ear anomalies is heterogenous. This ten-year experience demonstrates that the approach to ear molding should be dynamic and customized, using techniques beyond those listed in system manuals to complement each ear and to improve outcomes.

Comparison of 2 Ear Molding Systems for Nonsurgical Management of Newborn Auricular Deformities

BACKGROUND

Congenital auricular deformities are common diseases in newborn infants. We compared the efficacy of 2 ear molding systems in the nonsurgical management of newborn auricular deformities in Chinese infants.

METHODS

A total of 462 newborns with auricular deformities were treated with either the EarWell or the LiangEar ear molding systems. The posttreatment outcome was graded as excellent, fair, and poor. The differences in effectiveness between the 2 ear molding systems and factors that may affect the posttreatment outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

Both ear molding systems showed substantial efficacy in the treatment of newborn auricular deformities. The effective rate was comparable between the EarWell and the LiangEar systems for 4 types of auricular deformities (cryptotia, prominent ear, helical rim abnormality, and cup ear), while the costs for the LiangEar systems were half as much as that for the EarWell systems. Multivariate regression analysis showed that earlier time points at treatment initiation, less severe auricular deformities, treatment duration, and breastfeeding were the most significant predictive factors for a better outcome.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that using the EarWell and the LiangEar systems are both optimal nonsurgical approaches for treatment of most newborn auricular deformities.

Deformations of the Ear and Their Nonsurgical Correction

The incidence of congenital ear deformities has been documented to be as high as 58% of all newborns. Unfortunately, the majority of these deformations do not spontaneously self-correct, leaving the child with a permanent deformity that can only be corrected through surgery. With the evolving simplicity of ear molding that can be done in the office, this can obviate the need for unnecessary surgery that comes with its own set of complications and a higher cost. Early detection and early treatment is key for successful ear molding. The purpose of this article is to review the types of deformational ear deformities and the most up-to-date literature on ear molding, increase awareness to this topic, and ultimately increase patient and parental satisfaction with their overall care.