Comparison of Distraction Osteogenesis and Single-Stage Remodeling for Correction of Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis:

Perioperative Comparison Between Open Cranial Vault Remodeling and Distraction Osteogenesis for Unilateral Lambdoid Craniosynostosis

There are multiple treatment options for unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis (ULS) including open posterior cranial vault remodeling (OCVR) and distraction osteogenesis (DO). There is a paucity of data comparing these techniques in the treatment of ULS. This study compared the perioperative characteristics of these interventions for patients with ULS. An IRB-approved chart review was performed from January 1999 to November 2018 at a single institution. Inclusion criteria included the diagnosis of ULS, treatment with either OCVR or DO using a posterior rotational flap technique, and a minimum 1-year follow-up. Seventeen patients met the inclusion criteria (12 OCVR and 5 DO). Patients in each cohort were found to have a similar distribution in sex, age at the time of surgery, synostosis laterality, weight, and length of follow-up. There was no significant difference in mean estimated blood loss/kg, surgical time, or transfusion requirements between cohorts. Distraction osteogenesis patients had a longer mean hospital length of stay (3.4 +/- 0.6 d versus 2.0 +/- 0.6 d, P = 0.0004). All patients were admitted to the surgical ward postoperatively. In the OCVR cohort, complications included 1 dural tear, 1 surgical site infection, and 2 reoperations. In the DO cohort, 1 patient had a distraction site infection, treated with antibiotics. There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss, volume of blood transfusion, or surgical time between OCVR and DO. Patients who underwent OCVR had a higher incidence of postoperative complications and the need for reoperation. This data provides insight into the perioperative differences between OCVR and DO in patients with ULS.

Long-term aesthetic and photogrammetric outcomes in non-syndromic unicoronal synostosis: comparison of fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis and fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling

BACKGROUND

Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR) is among the most common surgical approaches for unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS), although some data demonstrate failure to achieve long-term aesthetic normalcy, leading some to seek alternative treatment paradigms such as fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO). This study compares long-term aesthetic outcomes of patients with UCS treated with FOAR and FODO.

METHODS

Twenty patients (four males) with non-syndromic UCS presenting to our institution and undergoing distraction were compared to a matched cohort of 20 patients (six males) undergoing FOAR. Clinical photographs and ImageJ were used to quantify periorbital anatomy including palpebral fissures, pupil-to-brow distance (PTB), and margin-reflex distance (MRD₁) in pixels. Whitaker classification was blindly assigned by craniofacial surgeons.

RESULTS

Photogrammetric analysis and Mann-Whitney U tests demonstrated significantly improved postoperative symmetry in distraction patients for palpebral width (p = 0.020), MRD₁ (p = 0.045), and canthal tilt (p = 0.010). Average Whitaker classification scores between FOAR (1.94) and distraction (1.79) cohorts were similar (p = 0.374).

CONCLUSIONS

UCS patients demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in periorbital symmetry, with distraction patients demonstrating superior results in palpebral width and canthal tilt. FOAR and FODO patients achieved similar Whitaker classification scores. These cohorts will be followed until craniofacial maturity prior to making any definitive conclusions.

Treatment of Unicoronal Craniosynostosis by Rotational Flap Technique Preserves Blood Supply to the Frontal Bone Flap

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) remains a challenging problem. Long-term results are often unsatisfactory secondary to recurrence of the original deformity, requiring secondary operations such as fat grafting or complete revision of the calvarial remodeling. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has recently emerged as a new modality for treatment of UCS, with promising results and decreased rates of reoperation compared with open cranial vault remodeling. A theoretical benefit of DO is preservation of blood supply to the frontal bone following osteotomy, as the frontal bone can be retained in situ compared with the complete removal and reshaping of the frontal bone during traditional fronto-orbital advancement. Preservation of blood supply to the frontal bone may allow for more robust bony healing and preservation of long-term growth potential; however, the vascularity of the frontal bone flap in DO has not previously been demonstrated. Here, we demonstrate unequivocally that blood supply to the frontal bone is preserved after creation of a rotational bone flap in DO management of UCS.

METHODS

Frontal bone flap creation via osteotomy for DO treatment of UCS was performed via previously reported technique. Indocyanine green was injected intravenously, and bone perfusion was assessed with a fluorescence imaging system.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent three cranial remodeling and three distractor removal procedures. After frontal bone flap creation via osteotomy for DO, perfusion to the osteotomized portion of the frontal bone flap is preserved. Blood flow is seen crossing the midline of the frontal bone. After removal of the distractor, perfusion in the osteoid consolidate is also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of blood supply has not been previously demonstrated empirically in the setting of DO treatment of UCS. We show for the first time that during frontal bone flap creation, blood flow to the osteotomized portion of the frontal bone flap is maintained. Robust blood flow to the osteoid consolidate is also demonstrated. These data support the use of DO in treatment of UCS, as preserved blood supply to the bone is more likely to support improved healing and long-term results.

Distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Craniosynostosis, a condition of premature cranial suture fusion, can have significantly detrimental effects on development and growth due to sequelae of increased intracranial hypertension (ICP), exophthalmos, and upper airway obstruction. Evolving surgical treatments now include distraction osteogenesis (DO) due to its many benefits relative to standard cranial vault remodeling procedures. This article provides an overview and update of different surgical applications of DO for patients with craniosynostosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

DO has been utilized successfully for single and multisuture craniosynostosis with or without midface hypoplasia to increase intracranial volume, decrease ICP and improve aesthetics. It has been applied in single suture synostosis, posterior vault DO, fronto-orbital advancement, monobloc DO and Le Fort III DO. DO has been applied through modification of traditional surgical procedures with success in maintaining goals of surgery while reducing risk.

SUMMARY

DO is still a relatively new and evolving surgical technique for patients with syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. With promising benefits, consideration for each procedure should be weighed until longer-term data is available.

Technical Strategy Using Piezosurgery to Correct Flattened Supraorbital Rim in Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis

ABSTRACT

The surgical correction of orbital deformities in patients with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis is challenging. Traditional techniques have shown the persistence of orbital flattening. This study presents a new strategy for remodeling the compromised orbit, using the piezosurgery technique, which improves the orbital curvature.