Postoperative Changes in Orbital Dysmorphology in Patients With Unicoronal Synostosis:

Nasal monobloc osteotomy for correction of late nasal and orbital asymmetry of unicoronal synostosis: A morphometric and outcomes study

BACKGROUND

Craniofacial asymmetry associated with unicoronal synostosis (UCS) may persist into the teenage years despite surgery in infancy. This study evaluated outcomes following a nasal monobloc procedure by mobilizing a united nasomaxillary and bilateral medial orbital segment of bone (nasal monobloc) to perform corrective translational and rotational movement for secondary correction of residual nasal-orbital asymmetry associated with UCS.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all UCS patients treated with nasal monobloc at our institution was performed. Demographic information was recorded, and pre- and postoperative 2D imaging was used for morphometric outcome analysis. Outcomes and complications were tabulated.

RESULTS

The study included 14 patients (5 males, 9 females; mean age 14.6 years; range 9.6 to 22.5 years; mean follow-up 70.6 months range 12 to 132 months). Ancillary procedures (scar revision, forehead/orbital contouring, MEDPOR® augmentation) were performed in all patients at the time of the nasal monobloc. One patient underwent a repeat procedure 6 years later following technique modification. Additionally, another patient experienced late overgrowth of the frontal sinus with forehead asymmetry. The morphometric analysis demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) pre-op to post-op improvements in naso-orbital asymmetry, as demonstrated by horizontal orbital aperture ratio (0.88 vs 0.99), midline to exocanthion ratio (0.91 vs 0.98), orbital index ratio (1.15 vs 1.01), and midline discrepancy (7.1 degrees vs 2.7 degrees).

CONCLUSION

Nasal monobloc osteotomy provides a reasonable surgical treatment to improve both the nasal and orbital asymmetries associated with unicoronal synostosis, including frontal nasal deviation, basal nasal deviation, and orbital aperture asymmetry. It is important to note that confounding anatomic variables such as globe dystopia, strabismus, and scleral show may affect the perception of orbital symmetry.

Outcomes of the early endoscopic-assisted suturectomy for treatment of multisuture craniosynostosis

To present the outcomes and adverse events associated with the endoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive suturectomy in patients with multisuture synostosis. This retrospective cohort study included children < 65 days of age who underwent endoscopic-assisted suturectomy (EAS) for multisuture craniosynostosis at a single tertiary referral center from 2013 to 2021. The primary outcome was calvarial expansion, and the secondary outcome was adverse events. The pre- and post-operative 3-dimensional brain computed tomography (CT) scan was used to calculate the intracranial volume and cephalic index. During a period of 2 years, 10 infants (10-64 days) diagnosed with multisuture synostosis underwent single-stage EAS of every affected suture in our center. The coronal suture was the most prevalent involved suture among our cases. The mean age and weight of the patients were 39 ± 17.5 days and 4.39 ± 0.8 kg, respectively. The surgical procedure took 42 ± 17.4 min of time and caused 46 ± 25.4 mL of bleeding on average. Ninety percent of the operations were considered successful (n = 9) regarding calvarial expansion. There were two complications, one requiring an open vault surgery and one repairing a leptomeningeal cyst. In the eight patients who did not necessitate further interventions, the mean pre-operative intracranial volume was 643.3 ± 189.4 cm3. The follow-up results within the average of 38.9 months after surgery showed that as age increases, the intracranial volume also increased significantly (R: 0.6, P < 0.0001), which suggests continued skull growth in patients who underwent EAS. With the low rate of intra- or post-operative complications and promising results on revising the restricted skull sutures, EAS seems both a safe and effective therapeutic modality in patients with multisuture synostosis, especially if completed in the first months after birth.

Craniometric and Aesthetic Outcomes in Craniosynostosis Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the published comparative aesthetic outcomes, and its determinants, for craniosynostoses surgically treated by minimally-invasive cranial procedures and open cranial vault remodeling (CVR).

DESIGN

PRISMA-compliant systematic review.

SETTING

Not-applicable.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Articles were included if they compared spring cranioplasty, strip minimally-invasive craniectomy or CVR for outcomes related to aesthetics or head shape. Forty-two studies were included, comprising 2402 patients.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The craniometric and PROM used to determine surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (59%) evaluated sagittal craniosynostosis, with metopic (7;17%) and unicoronal (4;10%) the next most prevalent. Thirty-eight studies (90%) included CVR, 24 (57%) included strip craniectomy with helmeting, 9 (22%) included strip craniectomy without helmeting, 11 (26%) included spring cranioplasty, and 3 (7%) included vault distraction. A majority of studies only used 1 (43%) or 2 (14%) craniometric measures to compare techniques. In sagittal synostosis, 13 (59%) studies showed no difference in craniometric outcomes, 5 (23%) showed better results with CVR, 3 (14%) with strip craniectomy, and 1 (5%) with springs. In studies describing other synostoses, 10/14 (71%) were equivocal. Subjective outcome measures followed similar trends. Meta-analysis shows no significant difference in cranial index (CI) outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures in patients with sagittal synostosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in CI outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures. The majority of literature comparing craniometric and aesthetic outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures shows equivocal results for sagittal synostosis. However, the heterogeneity of data for other craniosynostoses did not allow meta-analysis.

Treatment of Unicoronal Craniosynostosis by Rotational Flap Technique Preserves Blood Supply to the Frontal Bone Flap

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) remains a challenging problem. Long-term results are often unsatisfactory secondary to recurrence of the original deformity, requiring secondary operations such as fat grafting or complete revision of the calvarial remodeling. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has recently emerged as a new modality for treatment of UCS, with promising results and decreased rates of reoperation compared with open cranial vault remodeling. A theoretical benefit of DO is preservation of blood supply to the frontal bone following osteotomy, as the frontal bone can be retained in situ compared with the complete removal and reshaping of the frontal bone during traditional fronto-orbital advancement. Preservation of blood supply to the frontal bone may allow for more robust bony healing and preservation of long-term growth potential; however, the vascularity of the frontal bone flap in DO has not previously been demonstrated. Here, we demonstrate unequivocally that blood supply to the frontal bone is preserved after creation of a rotational bone flap in DO management of UCS.

METHODS

Frontal bone flap creation via osteotomy for DO treatment of UCS was performed via previously reported technique. Indocyanine green was injected intravenously, and bone perfusion was assessed with a fluorescence imaging system.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent three cranial remodeling and three distractor removal procedures. After frontal bone flap creation via osteotomy for DO, perfusion to the osteotomized portion of the frontal bone flap is preserved. Blood flow is seen crossing the midline of the frontal bone. After removal of the distractor, perfusion in the osteoid consolidate is also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of blood supply has not been previously demonstrated empirically in the setting of DO treatment of UCS. We show for the first time that during frontal bone flap creation, blood flow to the osteotomized portion of the frontal bone flap is maintained. Robust blood flow to the osteoid consolidate is also demonstrated. These data support the use of DO in treatment of UCS, as preserved blood supply to the bone is more likely to support improved healing and long-term results.

Ophthalmological findings in children with unicoronal craniosynostosis

INTRODUCTION

Among non-syndromic, single-suture craniosynostoses, unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) presents the highest rate of ophthalmic manifestations requiring a visual follow-up, due to the high risk of amblyopia. After birth or during childhood, children with UCS have a high risk to present an aniso-astigmatism and a strabismus. The aim of this study was to characterize clinical ophthalmologic findings associated with UCS in a paediatric cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective study included children admitted in our unit between 2015 and 2021, with isolated UCS treated in our institution and complete ophthalmological assessment comprising visual assessment, refractive status and oculomotor examination. Children with associated craniofacial disorders were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 28 children met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 62 [13-192] months with a large proportion of girls (86%) and 71% of right-sided UCS. The mean best corrected visual acuity was 0.07 (±0.13) LogMAR, including 10 (36%) children with an amblyopia or history of amblyopia. Astigmatism was significantly higher on the contralateral side of the UCS than on the ipsilateral side, with a refractive cylinder error of 0.97 (±1.06) vs 0.56 (±0.68) diopters, respectively (p = 0.03). Strabismus was observed in 20 patients (71%) with a main pattern of esotropia with a vertical component. A pseudo-superior oblique palsy was found in 13 children (65%) with a median cyclodeviation of 8.7° [-5,4°-20.6°].

CONCLUSION

Children with UCS experience a high rate of various visual manifestations. This study highlights their need for a strict ophthalmological follow-up, in order to early diagnose and prevent visual complications.

A Single-Center Retrospective Review of Perioperative Complications and Reoperation Rates Between Open Cranial Vault Remodeling and Distraction Osteogenesis for Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) is the third most prevalent form of craniosynostosis. Traditional treatment of UCS has been achieved with fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling (FOAR), but utilization of cranial distraction osteogenesis (DO) techniques has increased. This study aims to compare perioperative complications and reoperation trends in FOAR versus DO techniques at a single institution.

METHODS

An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review was performed from January 1999 to November 2018 at a single institution. Patients were those that have undergone FOAR or DO with an anterior rotational flap technique as previously described. Indications for secondary procedures included: contour deformities, relapse, surgical site infection, and persistent cranial defects.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients with UCS were identified, 64 patients underwent FOAR and 17 patients underwent DO. When perioperative characteristics were compared, patients who underwent DO were younger in age, however, there was no significant difference in transfusion requirement or length of stay between patient cohorts. Surgery time was increased in DO patients. When perioperative complications were compared, more intraoperative dural tears were observed in the FOAR cohort. When unplanned reoperation rates were compared, patients who had undergone FOAR had a statistically significant higher reoperation rates at 5 years of follow up. When including routine distractor removal as a reoperation, reoperative rate was increased in the DO cohort. No difference in reoperation rates was noted at 5 years following index operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile of DO is similar to that of traditional FOAR techniques for treatment of UCS. Longer-term follow-up studies are needed to elucidate whether outcomes are durable, but the unplanned reoperation rate in DO is less than that of FOAR at 5 years and presents several advantages that warrants its use in patients with UCS.

Orbital Volumetric Analysis in Patients With Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: A Comparison Between Distraction Osteogenesis and Fronto-Orbital Advancement

BACKGROUND

Unicoronal craniosynostosis is associated with orbital restriction and asymmetry. Surgical treatment aims to both correct the aesthetic deformity and prevent the development of ocular dysfunction. We used orbital quadrant and hemispheric volumetric analysis to assess orbital restriction and compare the effectiveness of distraction osteogenesis with anterior rotational cranial flap (DO) and bilateral fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling (FOAR) with respect to the correction of orbital restriction in patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of unicoronal craniosynostosis and treated with either DO or FOAR from 2000 to 2019 was performed. Preoperative and postoperative total orbital volumes, as well as quadrant and hemispheric volume ratios, were calculated from 3-dimensional head computed tomography scans. Selected preoperative and postoperative orbital measurements, including the maxillary length of the orbit (MLO; zygomaticofrontal suture to the top of zygomatic arch) and the sphenoid length of the orbit (SLO; the top of sphenoid suture to the top of zygomatic arch), were also obtained.

RESULTS

Data were available for 28 patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis. Mean preoperative total orbital volume was significantly smaller on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side (10.94 vs 12.20 cm3, P = 0.04). Preoperative MLO and SLO were significantly longer on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side (MLO: 20.26 vs 17.75 mm, P < 0.001; SLO: 26.91 vs 24.93 mm, P = 0.01). Distraction osteogenesis and FOAR produced significantly different changes in orbital quadrant and/or hemispheric volume ratios on the nonsynostotic side but not on the synostotic side.

CONCLUSIONS

Before correction, patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis have significantly smaller total orbital volumes on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side and significantly greater MLO and SLO on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side. There is no significant difference between DO and FOAR with regard to correcting the observed orbital restriction in these patients.

Orbital volume, ophthalmic sequelae and severity in unilateral coronal synostosis

PURPOSE

Unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS) results in an asymmetrical skull, including shallow and asymmetrical orbits, associated with reduced orbital volume and high prevalences of ophthalmic sequelae. Aim is to link orbital volumes in patients with UCS to severity according to UCSQ (Utrecht Cranial Shape Quantifier) and presence of ophthalmic sequelae.

METHODS

We included preoperative patients with UCS (≤ 18 months). Orbital volume was measured on CT scans by manual segmentation (Mimics software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium)), and severity of UCS was determined by UCSQ. Orbital volume of affected side was compared to unaffected side using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Orbital volume ratio was calculated (affected/unaffected volume) and compared to the category of UCSQ by Kruskal-Wallis test. Opthalmic sequelae were noted.

RESULTS

We included 19 patients (mean age 7 months). Orbital volume on affected side was significantly lower (p = 0.001), mean orbital volume ratio was 0.93 (SD 0.03). No significant differences in group means of orbital volume ratio between different levels of severity of UCSQ were found (Kruskal-Wallis H (2) = 0.873; p > 0.05). Ophthalmic sequelae were found in 3 patients; one had adduction impairment and strabismus (mild UCS), one had astigmatism (moderate UCS), and one had abduction impairment (on both ipsi- and contralateral side) and vertical strabismus (severe UCS).

CONCLUSION

No association between orbital volume ratio and severity of UCS was found. Side-to-side asymmetry in orbital volume was noted. No association between either preoperative orbital volume ratio or severity of UCS and the presence of preoperative ophthalmic sequelae was found.

Combined unilateral coronal-lambdoid suture synostosis: surgical outcome of suturectomy and postoperative helmet therapy

INTRODUCTION

Nonsyndromic, multi-suture craniosynostosis is not common, especially those involving unilateral coronal and lambdoid sutures. Based on the experience on 6 cases, we analyzed the skull morphology of combined unilateral coronal-lambdoid suture synostosis and evaluated the surgical outcome of suturectomy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent an operation for craniosynostosis in Seoul National University Children's Hospital from 2010 to 2018 were reviewed. For qualitative analysis of the surgical outcome, five typical morphologic characteristics (ipsilateral superior orbital rim deviation, deviation of the nasal ridge, ipsilateral frontal flattening, contralateral parietal bulging, ipsilateral occipitomastoid bulging) in unilateral coronal-lambdoid suture synostosis were evaluated based on medical photos, plain skull radiographs, and CT scans. For quantitative analysis, three parameters (nasal root deviation, orbital asymmetry, posterior skull base deviation) were measured.

RESULTS

Among 316 patients with craniosynostosis, 41 patients had nonsyndromic, multi-suture synostosis. There were 6 unilateral coronal-lambdoid suture synostosis patients who were all treated with suturectomy. Qualitative evaluation of the postoperative outcome revealed that the nasal root and orbital rim deviations and the contralateral occipitomastoid bulging showed satisfactory improvements. However, ipsilateral frontal flattening and contralateral parietal bulging were improved but still present in most cases. Quantitative, craniometric analysis supported the qualitative outcomes. The nasal ridge deviation angle was corrected from 7.04 to 1.79 degrees. The posterior skull base deviation angle improved from 6.29 to 3.55 degrees.

CONCLUSION

Unilateral coronal-lambdoid suture synostosis suturectomy followed by helmet therapy resulted in favorable outcomes, although the correction of frontal flattening was less satisfactory than the other measures. Considering the minimal invasiveness of the treatment, suturectomy may be a viable option for these patients.