Cleft Lip and Palate Midfacial Hypoplasia: Criteria to Choose the Treatment

Naso-alveolar Asymmetry in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients-CT Analysis of the Paranasal Region

Secondary deformities to the midfacial area in adolescence and adulthood are common sequelae after primary cleft lip and palate repair and lead to significant functional, aesthetic and psychosocial challenges. Treatment for patients with normal occlusion or treated malocclusion and remaining midfacial hypoplasia includes autologous and alloplastic augmentation of the maxilla. Because of the great variation of deformities, accurate evaluation is essential for appropriate treatment planning. To provide insights in the altered midfacial anatomy in cleft patients, a retrospective computed tomography morphologic analysis of the anterior projection of the maxilla in the paranasal region, soft tissue thickness, and relation of soft tissue to bony landmarks was performed in adolescent, unilateral, non-syndromic complete cleft and palate patients. The anterior projection of the maxilla was very variable with the cleft side bone surface being more anterior relative to the non-cleft side in some patients. Soft tissue thickness was not significantly different between cleft and non-cleft side. The lateral distance from the most anterior point of the maxilla to subalare was significantly smaller on the cleft side as compared with the non-cleft side. The authors' study demonstrates that in cleft lip and palate patients midfacial anatomy with regards to maxilla projection at the pyriform aperture is very variable making accurate evaluation of the bone morphology and an individualized treatment plan a prerequisite for successful correction of nasomaxillary deformities.

Reducing the risk of tooth injury in anterior maxillary interdental osteotomy for cleft lip and palate patients using a surgical navigation technique

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical feasibility of preventing tooth injury from anterior maxillary interdental osteotomy by using a surgical navigation technique. A retrospective review was conducted on cleft lip and palate patients treated with anterior maxillary osteotomy followed by distraction osteogenesis between August 2019 and May 2022. Patients operated on through image guidance were enrolled in the navigation group, while those who were operated on freehand were enrolled in the freehand group. Tooth injuries were identified on postoperative images. Linear and angular deviations of the osteotomy line were measured. Twelve patients were enrolled in the study, seven in the navigation group and five in the freehand group. Altogether, 24 osteotomy lines and 53 adjacent teeth were evaluated. The dental injury rate was 3% in the navigation group and 27% in the freehand group (P = 0.016). The average linear deviations (mean ± standard deviation) were 0.67 ± 0.30 mm and 2.05 ± 1.33 mm, respectively (P < 0.001), while the average angular deviations were 1.67 ± 0.68° and 11.41 ± 7.46°, respectively (P < 0.001). The results suggest that navigation was able to reduce the tooth injury risk compared with freehand interdental osteotomies in crowded dental arches.

Optimizing Facial Esthetic Outcomes: Adding Distraction Osteogenesis to Your Classic Orthognathic Surgery Armamentarium

Classical orthognathic procedures have long been known to improve the facial esthetic contours and proportions of face by restoring the skeletal foundation, on which the soft-tissue drapes. Distraction osteogenesis was introduced to solve complex skeletal abnormalities in patients with craniofacial conditions that could not be solved by classical orthognathic surgery techniques. The gradual expansion in this group of patients showed not only greater skeletal stability, but the expansion at various tissue planes improved the facial appearance. In this report we review our experience in 22 cases with dentofacial skeletal abnormities for whom we believe achieved aesthetic outcomes could not habe been with classical orthognathic techniques alone. In addition, distraction at the interdental regions allowed for "tailoring" of the osteotomies and for simultaneous expansion at the occlusal level.