Assessment of the Functionality of the Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap Skin Paddle

Distal positioning of the skin paddle of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction

BACKGROUND

To assess outcomes of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMF) wherein the skin paddle (SP) was positioned with its distal portion extending beyond the lower border of pectoralis major by ≥2 cm (PMF-d).

METHODS

Consecutive head and neck reconstructions with PMF-d (n = 110). SP dimensions l2 (distal extent below the lower border of pectoralis major), l1 (proximal extent above lower border of pectoralis major), and b (breadth) were recorded. Endpoints were SP necrosis, recipient dehiscence, early fistula, and persistent fistula.

RESULTS

Median values of l2 , l1 , and b were 3.0, 6.0, and 6.0 cm, respectively. When l2  = 2.0-3.0 cm, SP necrosis occurred in only one (1%) subject (with obesity). When l2 was ≥3.5 cm, necrosis occurred in four (16%) subjects, three of whom also had l1 /l2  < 2.0 (proximal SP < 67% of entire SP). Statistically, increased l2 was the only risk factor for necrosis (p = 0.001). Overall, incidence of recipient dehiscence, early fistula, and persistent fistula were 32 (29%), 20 (20%), and 3 (3%), respectively. Persistent fistula occurred only in the setting of SP necrosis and/or re-irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Careful patient selection, adequate proximal SP, and l2  = 2.0-3.0 cm is associated with a negligible risk of necrosis. The enhanced reach and laxity and additional skin surface area and soft tissue volume conferred with PMF-d facilitate recipient wound healing.

Quality of Life and Aesthetic Satisfaction in Patients Who Underwent the “Commando Operation” with Pectoralis Major Myocutaneus Flap Reconstruction—A Case Series Study

The “commando operation” is an extensive surgical procedure used to treat patients with oral squamous carcinoma and metastasis in the cervical lymph nodes. While the procedure can be curative, it is also very mutilating, which consequently has a major impact on the patient’s quality of life. Several studies showed that the procedure is associated with loss of certain functions, such as impairments in speech, chewing, swallowing, and loss of taste and appetite. Furthermore, some of these impairments and their degree depend on the reconstruction method. However, the data regarding the functional impairments and aesthetic results in patients who underwent the “commando operation” along with the pectoralis major myocutaneus flap reconstruction are still inconclusive. This study included 34 patients that underwent partial glossectomy, ipsilateral modified radical neck dissection, pectoralis major myocutaneus flap reconstruction, and adjuvant radiotherapy. A structured questionnaire was used to evaluate aesthetical results and functional impairments as well as to grade the level of satisfaction with the functional and aesthetic outcomes both by the patients and by the operator. Most of the patients stated that their speech (N = 33; 97%) and salivation (N = 32; 94.2%) severely changed after the operation and that they cannot chew (N = 33; 97%) and swallow (N = 33; 97%) the same as before the operation. Moreover, almost half of the patients (N = 16; 47%) reported that they have severe sleep impairments. However, only few of the included patients stated that they sought professional help regarding the speech (N = 4; 11.7%), eating (N = 5; 14.7%), and sleeping (N = 4; 11.7%) disturbances. Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference between the operator and the patients in the subjective assessment of the aesthetic results (p = 0.047), as operators gave significantly better grades. Our results imply that this procedure and reconstructive method possibly cause impairments that have an impact on the patients’ wellbeing. Moreover, our outcomes also suggest that patients should be educated and rehabilitated after the “commando operation” since most of them were reluctant to seek professional help regarding their impairments. Lastly, sleep deficiency, which was observed after the procedure, should be further explored.

Assessment of the quality of life of patients with oral cancer after pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction with a focus on speech

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of patients with oral cancer who had undergone resection of the tongue and floor of the mouth and reconstruction with the pectoralis major flap.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study assessed 21 patients who had undergone pectoralis major flap reconstruction using the University of Washington QoL, version 4, questionnaire. A nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Of the 12 disease-specific domains, the best 3 scores from the patients were for pain, saliva, and anxiety, and the worst 3 scores were for taste, chewing, and swallowing. The mean UW-QoL composite score was 73.4. Swallowing was considered to be the most important issue within the previous 7 days, followed by chewing and speech. Those patients who had undergone wider excision had poorer speech.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant effect was found on the QoL of patients with oral cancer who had undergone resection of the tongue and floor of the mouth with pectoralis major flap reconstruction.