The Feasibility of Third or More Repeat Hepatectomy for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2015;262:347-357. [PMID: 25185473 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000882]

Prognostic potential of preoperative circulating tumor cells to predict the early progression recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

The role of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in prognosis prediction has been actively studied in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, their efficiency in accurately predicting early progression recurrence (EPR) is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical potential of preoperative CTCs to predict EPR in HCC patients after hepatectomy.

METHODS

One hundred forty-five HCC patients, whose preoperative CTCs were detected, were enrolled. Based on the recurrence times and types, the patients were divided into four groups, including early oligo-recurrence (EOR), EPR, late oligo-recurrence (LOR), and late progression recurrence (LPR).

RESULTS

Among the 145 patients, 133 (91.7%) patients had a postoperative recurrence, including 51 EOR, 42 EPR, 39 LOR, and 1 LPR patient. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis indicated that the HCC patients with EPR had the worst OS. There were significant differences in the total-CTCs (T-CTCs) and CTCs subtypes count between the EPR group with EOR and LOR groups. Cox regression analysis indicated that the T-CTC count of > 5/5 mL, the presence of microvascular invasion (MVI) and satellite nodules were the independent risk factors for EPR. The efficiency of T-CTCs was superior as compared to those of the other indicators in predicting EPR. Moreover, the combined model demonstrated a markedly superior area under the curve (AUC).

CONCLUSIONS

The HCC patients with EPR had the worst OS. The preoperative CTCs was served as a prognostic indicator of EPR for HCC patients. The combined models, including T-CTCs, MVI, and satellite nodules, had the best performance to predict EPR after hepatectomy.

Long-term outcomes and salvageability in patients undergoing liver resection for intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUNDS

The prognosis of intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection should be comprehensively analyzed due to the high incidence of tumor recurrence and the availability of salvage therapy. This study evaluated the long-term outcome and salvageability in these patients after liver resection.

METHODS

Data from consecutive patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent initial liver resection from 2000 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Analyses were performed in the setting of the initial liver resection and the recurrence(s). Active salvage therapy for recurrence was defined as the implementation of each therapy with curative intent-repeat surgery, ablative therapy, and liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Among the 1,013 liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma, a total of 270 patients were eligible for this study (intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 134; advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 136). The 5-year overall survival rates for intermediate and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma were 49.7% and 36.8%, respectively; meanwhile, the actual recurrence rates excluding patients who died without recurrence were 94.7% and 90.7%, respectively. Active salvage therapy was performed in 43 (39.8%) patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma and 25 (23.4%) patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Overall survival after initial liver resection, first active salvage therapy, and second/more active salvage therapy were comparable in both stages.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that although liver resection alone may not yield remission in most patients with intermediate and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, active salvage therapy can potentially prolong survival. Further study to identify approaches to decrease recurrence rates and increase salvageability for these patients would be warranted.

Surgical site wound infection and pain after laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

This study aimed to compare the effects of laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) and open repeat liver resection (ORLR) on surgical site wound infection and pain in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data were systematically searched for studies comparing LRLR with ORLR for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma, with a search timeframe from their inception to December 2022. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted information, and evaluated the quality of the studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. A total of 20 publications with 4380 patients were included, with 1108 and 3289 patients in the LRLR and ORLR groups, respectively. The results showed that LRLR significantly reduced surgical site wound infection rate (1.71% vs. 5.16%, odds ratio [OR]:0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.56, P < .001), superficial wound infection rate (1.29% vs. 4.92%, OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.14-0.58, P < .001), bile leakage (3.34% vs. 6.05%, OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.39-0.90, P = .01), organ/space wound infection rate (0.4% vs. 5.11%, OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.81, P = .02), and surgical site wound pain (mean difference: -2.00, 95% CI: -2.99 to -1.02, P < .001). Thus, the findings of this study showed that LRLR for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma significantly reduced wound infection rates and improved postoperative wound pain.

Prognosis of repeat hepatectomy for liver transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy: a Retrospective Cohort Study with the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO)

PURPOSE

Factors affecting the prognosis of repeat hepatectomy for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after hepatectomy remain unclear. We aimed to clarify the prognostic factors for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy.

METHODS

We included 1758 primary and 486 repeat hepatectomies out of 2244 for HCC performed between 2006 and 2017 using the Hiroshima Study Group for Clinical Oncology and Surgery database. We first compared survival rates of primary and repeat hepatectomy patients. Subsequently, prognostic factors were analyzed in patients who underwent a repeat hepatectomy for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy (defined as age < 70 years at the time of recurrence and recurrent tumor morphology that meets the Milan criteria).

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rate (OS) after repeat hepatectomy was 63.2%, while the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) was 23.7%. RFS demonstrated significant inferiority in the repeat hepatectomy group than in the primary hepatectomy group; however, OS did not present a notable difference between the two cohorts. In the transplantable recurrence group, mALBI grade 2b, max tumor size > 20 mm, and multiple tumors were independent prognostic risk factors for overall survival. Patients with two or more risk factors had a significantly lower survival rate (only 30.6% at 5 years) compared to those with one or fewer risk factors (81.8% at 5 years).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the risk factors involved in post-hepatectomy survival for patients with transplantable recurrence after hepatectomy. The results are a potential indicator of whether salvage liver transplantation should be considered during repeat hepatectomy.

Current status and prospect of treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Owing to its heterogeneous and highly aggressive nature, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high recurrence rate, which is a non-negligible problem despite the increasing number of available treatment options. Recent clinical trials have attempted to reduce the recurrence and develop innovative treatment options for patients with recurrent HCC. In the event of liver remnant recurrence, the currently available treatment options include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, tumor ablation, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, stereotactic body radiotherapy, systemic therapies, and combination therapy. In this review, we summarize the strategies to reduce the recurrence of high-risk tumors and aggressive therapies for recurrent HCC. Additionally, we discuss methods to prevent HCC recurrence and prognostic models constructed based on predictors of recurrence to develop an appropriate surveillance program.

Disease-Free Interval and Tumor Stage Complementarily Predict the Biological Behavior of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Currently used treatment algorithms were originally established based on the clinical outcomes of the initial treatment for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and no strong evidence exists yet to suggest if these algorithms could also be applicable to patients with recurrent HCC after surgery. As such, this study sought to explore an optimal risk stratification method for cases of recurrent HCC for better clinical management.

METHODS

Among the 1616 patients who underwent curative resection for HCC, the clinical features and survival outcomes of 983 patients who developed recurrence were examined in detail.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis confirmed that both the disease-free interval (DFI) from the previous surgery and tumor stage at recurrence were significant prognostic factors. However, the prognostic impact of DFI seemed different according to the tumor stages at recurrence. While curative-intent treatment showed strong influence on survival [hazard ratio (HR), 0.61; P < 0.001] regardless of the DFI in patients with stage 0 or stage A disease at recurrence, early recurrence (< 6 months) was a poor prognostic marker in patients with stage B disease. The prognosis of patients with stage C disease was exclusively influenced by the tumor distribution or choice of treatment than by the DFI.

CONCLUSIONS

The DFI complementarily predicts the oncological behavior of recurrent HCC, with its predictive value differing depending on the tumor stage at recurrence. These factors should be considered for selection of the optimal treatment in patients with recurrent HCC after curative-intent surgery.

Short-term Outcomes and Difficulty of Repeat Laparoscopic Liver Resection

Objectives

To investigate the feasibility of repeat laparoscopic liver resection (Rep-LLR), including repeat anatomical resection (Rep-AR), as compared to initial-LLR (Ini-LLR).

Background

The indications of LLR have expanded to treatment of recurrent liver tumors. However, the feasibility of Rep-LLR, including Rep-AR, has not yet been adequately assessed.

Methods

Data of 297 patients who had undergone LLR were reviewed. Among the 297 patients, 235 (AR: 168) had undergone Ini-LLR and 62 (AR: 27) had undergone Rep-LLR, and the surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. In addition, multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of the difficulty of Rep-LLR based on the operation time and volume of blood loss.

Results

Of the 62 patients who had undergone Rep-LLR, 44, 14, and 4 had undergone second, third, and fourth repeat LRs, respectively. No significant intergroup differences were observed in regard to the operation time, blood loss, conversion rate to open surgery, postoperative morbidity, or postoperative hospital stay. However, the proportion of patients in whom the Pringle maneuver was used was significantly lower in the Rep-LLR group than in the Ini-LLR group. Multivariate analysis identified surgical procedure ≥sectionectomy at the initial/previous LR and an IWATE difficulty score of ≥6 as being independent predictors of the difficulty of Rep-LLR. Use of adhesion barriers at the initial/previous LR was associated with a decreased risk of failure to perform the Pringle maneuver during Rep-LLR.

Conclusions

Rep-LLR can offer outcomes comparable to those of Ini-LLR over the short term.

Prognostic Advantages of Individual Additional Interventions After Lenvatinib Therapy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Increasing number of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has recently achieved salvage interventions after introduction of new biologic agents, while there are insufficient data to determine if such additional intervention(s) after treatment with newer biologic agents are truly advantageous for patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

The clinical records of 107 consecutive patients who underwent lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC were extensively reviewed and the prognostic advantages of individual additional treatments after lenvatinib treatment were investigated through a regression analysis considering time-dependent covariates.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that R0 resection or curative-intent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.32), transarterial chemoembolization or transarterial infusion therapy (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.81), and subsequent line of systemic therapy (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.63) were associated with improved disease-specific survival (DSS), while R2 resection or palliative-intent RFA showed no correlation with DSS. The best response during lenvatinib therapy, nutritional status, plasma des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin level, a baseline CT enhancement pattern, and BCLC stage were also selected as independent predictors for DSS. Among the various treatments performed after lenvatinib therapy, R0 resection also showed clear prognostic advantage in both progression-free survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.58) and time-to-treatment failure (HR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.39), suggesting that successful conversion to surgery may prolong survival outcomes through prolonged cancer-free interval in advanced HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional intervention(s)/treatment(s) after lenvatinib therapy for advanced HCC may have prognostic advantage in strictly selected populations. Successful conversion to curative resection may offer survival benefit with acceptable clinical outcomes.

Efficacy of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy compared with open repeat hepatectomy: a single-center, propensity score matching study

Introduction

Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) is considered to be a technically challenging procedure which has not been widely applied. This study aimed to assess the accessibility and security of LRH for patients with hepatic tumor recurrence.

Methods

Between January 2010 and October 2020, we performed 48 LRHs and 31 open repeat hepatectomies (ORHs) for recurrent liver cancer. LRHs were matched to ORHs (1:1) using propensity score matching (PSM) created by comparing preoperative factors. The perioperative data of patients were retrospectively analyzed, including baseline data, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, pathology, days of postoperative stay, complication morbidity, and mortality within 30 days. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates with appropriate follow-up were obtained to evaluate the long-term outcomes.

Results

Compared with the ORH, LRH was related with shorter operative duration (169.9 versus 232.9 ml, p < 0.01), less intraoperative bleeding (100.0 versus 500.0 ml, p < 0.01), lower rate of blood transfusion (8.3% versus 58.1%, p < 0.01), and shorter hospitalization (5.0 versus 11.0 days, p < 0.01). The median follow-up was 31 months. The LRH 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival were 77.1%, 61.6%, and 46.2% versus 82.3%, 66.5%, and 29.5% for ORH (p = 0.77). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates of the two groups were 73.4%, 62.0%, and 44.3% versus 66.1%, 44.1%, and 14.7%, respectively (p = 0.22).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic repeated hepatectomy is safe and practicable with great short-term results for selected patients.

A Model Based on Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Monitoring Recurrence of HCC after Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

There is no satisfactory indicator for monitoring recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective study aimed to design and validate an HCC monitor recurrence (HMR) model for patients without metastasis after hepatectomy.

METHODS

A training cohort was recruited from 1179 patients with HCC without metastasis after hepatectomy between February 2012 and December 2015. An HMR model was developed using an AdaBoost classifier algorithm. The factors included patient age, TNM staging, tumor size, and pre/postoperative dynamic variations of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). The diagnostic efficacy of the model was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). The model was validated using a cohort of 695 patients.

RESULTS

In preoperative patients with positive or negative AFP, the AUC of the validation cohort in the HMR model was .8877, which indicated better diagnostic efficacy than that of serum AFP (AUC, .7348). The HMR model predicted recurrence earlier than computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging did by 191.58 ± 165 days. In addition, the HMR model can predict the prognosis of patients with HCC after resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The HMR model established in this study is more accurate than serum AFP for monitoring recurrence after hepatectomy for HCC and can be used for real-time monitoring of the postoperative status in patients with HCC without metastasis.

Impact of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of lesions in the right posterosuperior liver segments on surgical outcomes: A multicenter study based on propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic lesions is increasingly performed worldwide. However, parenchyma-sparing laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic lesions in the right posterosuperior segments is very technically demanding. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection and open liver resection for hepatic lesions in the right posterosuperior segments.

METHODS

In total, 617 patients who underwent liver resection of hepatic lesions in the right posterosuperior segments (segment Ⅶ or Ⅷ) at 8 centers were included in this study. We lessened the impact of confounders through propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, and double/debiased machine learning estimations.

RESULTS

After matching and weighting, the imbalance between the 2 groups significantly decreased. Compared with open liver resection, laparoscopic liver resection was associated with a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications in the matched and weighted cohorts. After surgery, the incidence of pulmonary complication and cardiac disease was lower in the laparoscopic liver resection group than in the open liver resection group in both the matched and weighted cohorts. The odds ratios of laparoscopic liver resection for postoperative complications in the matched and weighted cohorts were 0.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.83) and 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.25%-0.64%), respectively. The double/debiased machine learning risk difference estimator for postoperative complications of laparoscopic liver resection was -19.8% (95% confidence interval, -26.8% to -13.4%).

CONCLUSION

Parenchyma-sparing laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic lesions in the right posterosuperior segments had clinical benefits, including lower volume of intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications.

Multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of new biologic agents

With the recent advances in the field of systemic therapy, an increasing number of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are expected to benefit from surgery. However, given the complex background of the disease and frequent presence of underlying liver injury, treatment of advanced HCC is rather complex and the treatment principle applied to colorectal liver metastases, for which conversion surgery has been actively performed, is often not applicable to patients with HCC. To maximize the survival outcomes of patients with HCC, optimization of each step of treatment through a multidisciplinary approach is inevitable. As the initial treatment, systematic removal of the tumor-bearing portal territory is associated with improved survival in patients with solitary HCC, and radiofrequency ablation is also effective for small, oligo HCCs. Although the high incidence of recurrence even after curative-intent treatment is a major issue in HCC, aggressive treatment for recurrence is also important, because a prolonged cancer-free interval is reported to be associated with improved overall survival. For patients with advanced disease, recently introduced molecular-targeted agents may potentially be effective for successful conversion to surgery in initially unresectable cases, although the overall response rate of HCC to systemic therapies remains unsatisfactory as compared to that of colorectal liver metastases. In this report, the theoretical bases for the management of HCC are revisited and the currently used strategies to maximize the survival outcomes in patients with advanced HCC is discussed.

Anatomic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prognostic Impact Assessed from Recurrence Treatment

BACKGROUND

The oncologic advantage of anatomic resection (AR) for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical advantages of AR for primary HCC by using propensity score-matching and by assessing treatment strategies for recurrence after surgery.

METHODS

The study reviewed data of patients who underwent AR or non-anatomic resection (NAR) for solitary HCC (≤ 5 cm) in two institutions between 2004 and 2017. Surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups in a propensity score-adjusted cohort. The time-to-interventional failure (TIF), defined as the elapsed time from resection to unresectable/unablatable recurrence, also was evaluated.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 250 patients: 77 patients (31%) with AR and 173 patients (69%) with NAR. In the propensity score-matched populations (AR, 67; NAR, 67), the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for AR was better than for NAR (62% vs 35%; P = 0.005). No differences, however, were found in the 5-year overall survival between the two groups (72% vs 78%; P = 0.666). The 5-year TIF rates for the NAR group (60%) also were similar to those for the AR group (66%) (P = 0.413). In the cohort of 67 patients, curative repeat resection or ablation therapy was performed more frequently for the NAR patients (42%) than for the AR patients (10%) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For solitary HCC, AR decreases recurrence after the initial hepatectomy. However, aggressive curative-intent interventions for recurrence compensate for the impaired RFS, even for patients undergoing NAR.

Adhesions as a risk factor for postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy and the potential efficacy of adhesion barriers

BACKGROUND

The actual efficacy of use of adhesion barriers during liver surgery remains to be fully understood.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive review of clinical data and operation videos of 210 patients who underwent repeat hepatectomy to clarify the factors associated with the degree of adhesion as evaluated by the TORAD score.

RESULTS

Adhesion barriers were placed in 131 patients (Seprafilm^® [n = 77], Adspray^® [n = 32], and Interceed^® [n = 22)]), but not in the remaining 79 patients during the previous surgery. Multivariate analysis identified a high adhesion severity score at relaparotomy as being associated with an increased risk of postoperative global morbidity (odds ratio [OR], 1.75 per +1 point, P < .001) and major morbidity (OR, 1.88 per +1 point; P < .001), and use of an adhesion barrier at the previous surgery as being an independent predictor of a low adhesion severity score (OR, 0.21; P < .001). Use of adhesion barriers showed tendency toward lower adhesion severity scores at relaparotomy as compared to the control group, irrespective of the type of adhesion barrier used.

CONCLUSION

A high degree of adhesion formation was directly associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity after relaparotomy, and use of adhesion barriers appears to reduce the extent of adhesion.

Proposal for a revised system for classifying difficulty of laparoscopic partial liver resection

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate a revised classification system for predicting the difficulty of laparoscopic partial liver resection.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone initial laparoscopic partial liver resection for a solitary lesion from January 2012 to February 2021were classified into two groups according to the type of procedure performed, "scooping-out" versus "cutting." The participants were then further divided into "small" and "large" subgroups according to the tumor's depth and diameter. Finally, they were categorized into two groups, namely "standard" and "advanced." Operative outcomes were compared between the two groups and the proposed revised system for classifying difficulty of laparoscopic partial liver resection compared with the existing scoring system.

RESULTS

Of the 65 procedures assessed, 40 were categorized as standard and 25 as advanced. Tumor size (P < 0.001), operation time (P < 0.001), volume of intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.001), rate of the Pringle maneuver (P = 0.044), and resected liver weight (P < 0.001) were significantly greater in the advanced than in the standard group. Differences in operation time and intraoperative blood loss were not identified by the existing difficulty scoring system.

CONCLUSION

The proposed revised classification is useful for predicting the difficulty of laparoscopic partial liver resection.

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic repeat liver resection and re-operation for liver tumor

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been reported as a safe, minimally invasive, and effective surgery for the management of liver tumor. However, the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) for recurrent liver tumor are unclear. Here, we analyzed the surgical results of LRLR. From June 2010 to May 2019, we performed 575 LLR surgeries in our department, and 454 of them underwent pure LLR for the single tumor. We classified the patients who received pure LLR for the single tumor into three groups: LRLR (n = 80), laparoscopic re-operation after previous abdominal surgery (LReOp; n = 136), and laparoscopic primary liver resection (LPLR; n = 238). We compared patient characteristics and surgical results between patients undergoing LRLR, LReOp and LPLR. We found no significant differences between LRLR and LPLR in the conversion rate to laparotomy (p = 0.8033), intraoperative bleeding (63.0 vs. 152.4 ml; p = 0.0911), or postoperative bile leakage rate (2.50 vs. 3.78%; p = 0.7367). We also found no significant difference in the surgical results between LReOp and LPLR. However, the number of patients undergoing the Pringle maneuver was lower in the LRLR group than the LPLR group (61.3 vs. 81.5%; p = 0.0004). This finding was more pronounced after open liver resection than laparoscopic liver resection (38.9 vs. 67.7%; p = 0.0270). The operative time was significantly longer in patients with proximity to previous cut surface than patients with no proximity to previous cut surface (307.4 vs. 235.7 min; p = 0.0201). LRLR can safely be performed with useful surgical results compared to LPLR.

Parenchymal-sparing approaches for resection of tumors located in the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe of the liver-utility of limited resection and central hepatectomy

PURPOSE

Resection of liver cancer involving the paracaval portion (PC) of the caudate lobe is challenging because the PC is located deepest in the liver. This study aimed to elucidate the utility of two parenchymal-sparing approaches of limited resection and central hepatectomy for resecting tumors located in the PC.

METHODS

In 2018 and 2020, 12 out of 143 patients underwent hepatectomy for tumors located in the PC of the liver. In six patients, limited resection (LR) of the PC after full mobilization of the liver off the inferior vena cava (IVC) was performed for tumors excluding the hilar plate or large hepatic veins (large HVs), including major hepatic veins or thick short hepatic veins. In six patients, central hepatectomy (CH) using liver tunnel was performed for tumors involving or close to the hilar plate and/or large HVs.

RESULTS

During CH, the surgical view of the cranial side of the hilar plate was wide enough to perform combined resection of the large HVs in front of the IVC. Five of the six CHs were performed with resection of the LHVs. No LRs were accompanied with resection of the LHVs. The CH was associated with longer Pringle's time (76 min vs. 29.5 min, p = 0.015) and blood loss (1104 ml vs. 370 ml, p = 0.041). The preserved liver parenchyma volumes were 82% and 95% of the total liver volume after CH and LR, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our parenchymal-sparing approach for resection of liver cancer located in the PC is feasible for curative resection.

Hyaluronic acid/ carboxymethyl cellulose-based adhesion barrier reduces surgical difficulty and complication in repeat hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

There has been no solid evidence regarding the actual efficacy of adhesion barriers in liver surgery.

METHODS

Difficulty grade of lysis of adhesion was evaluated in 122 patients who underwent repeat hepatectomy (ReHx) using the TORAD score. Technical difficulty of lysis of adhesion and incidence of complication were then compared between the group of patients who received a sheet-type adhesion barrier (Seprafilm®) in the previous hepatectomy (n = 70) and those who did not (n = 52) using the inverse probability weighting method.

RESULTS

Use of Seprafilm was significantly associated with lower grade of difficulty of lysis of adhesion according to the TORAD score (P < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity rate was lower and postoperative stay was shorter in the Seprafilm group in the propensity-score adjusted population (37% vs. 74%, P < 0.001 and 12 days vs. 14 days in median, P = 0.048). Multivariate analysis confirmed that use of Seprafilm was independent predictor for severity of adhesion (odds ratio [OR] 0.24, 95% CI, 0.09-0.65, P = 0.005) and decreased incidence of postoperative morbidity at ReHx (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14-0.84, P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of Seprafilm may be associated with decreased technical difficulty of lysis of adhesion and may correlate with lower risk of postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing ReHx.

Anatomical resection is useful for the treatment of primary solitary hepatocellular carcinoma with predicted microscopic vessel invasion and/or intrahepatic metastasis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate anatomical resection (AR) versus non-AR for primary solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with predicted microscopic vessel invasion (MVI) and/or microscopic intrahepatic metastasis (MIM).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 358 patients who underwent hepatectomy and had no evidence of MVI and/or MIM on preoperative imaging. The predictors of MVI and/or MIM were identified. The AR group (n = 222) and the non-AR group (n = 136) were classified by number of risk factor, and the survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

Microscopic vessel invasion and/or MIM were identified in 81 (22.6%) patients. A multivariate analysis showed that high des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin concentration [odds ratio (OR) 3.35], large tumor size (OR 3.16), and high aspartate aminotransferase concentration (OR 2.13) were significant predictors. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the patients with zero, one, two, and three risk factors were 97.4%, 73.5%, 71.5%, and 65.5%, respectively. The OS of AR is superior to that of non-AR only in patients with one or two risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The present findings suggest that AR should be performed for patients with one or two risk factors, and that AR may prevent recurrence, as these patients are at risk of having MVI and/or MIM.

Inhibition of glycolytic activator PFKFB3 suppresses tumor growth and induces tumor vessel normalization in hepatocellular carcinoma

Glycolysis emerges as a new therapeutic target for malignancies. The inhibition of glycolytic activator, PFKFB3, repairs tumor endothelial cell function, and normalizing the tumor microenvironment. We aimed to investigate the significance of PFKFB3 in HCC, and the effects of the PFKFB3 inhibitor, PFK15, in HCC tumor cells and tumor endothelial cells. Double immunofluorescent staining of PFKFB3 and CD31 in HCC tissues revealed that high PFKFB3 expression in both tumor cells and tumor endothelial cells was significantly correlated with poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis identified PFKFB3 expression as an independent prognostic factor. PFK15 suppressed proliferation of HCC cell line and tumor endothelial cells in vitro. In a subcutaneous tumor model of the HCC cell line with tumor endothelial cells, PFK15 suppressed tumor growth and induced apoptosis. Moreover, PFK15 treatment induced tumor vessel normalization, decreasing vessel diameter with pericyte attachment and improving vessel perfusion. High PFKFB3 expression in both tumor cells and tumor endothelial cells was identified as a novel prognostic marker in HCC. Targeting PFKFB3 via PFK15 might be a promising strategy for suppressing tumor growth and inducing tumor vessel normalization.

Hepatectomy and liver regeneration in the results of treatment of colorectal liver metastasis

Introduction

Hepatectomy is currently the most reliable treatment modality for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This paper describes and discusses the outcomes of initial versus repeat hepatic resection for CRLM.

Material and methods

Between January 2008 and December 2018, we retrospectively analyzed the data of 385 patients who underwent initial and repeat hepatic resection for CRLM at a single institution with respect to surgical outcomes and remnant liver regeneration. The remnant liver volume was postoperatively measured via computed tomography on postoperative day 7 and at 1, 2, 5, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Results

The liver regeneration rate peaked at 1 week postoperatively, and gradually decreased thereafter. Remnant liver volume plateaued around 1–2 months postoperatively, when regeneration was almost complete. There was no difference in the rate of liver volume regeneration during the entire postoperative period between initial and repeat hepatic resection (p = 0.708, 0.511, 0.055, 0.053, 0.102, and 0.110, respectively). After 2 months postoperatively, the laboratory data showed recovery toward near normal levels, and none of the data exhibited significant differences. There were also no significant differences in morbidity rate, mortality rate, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival after hepatic resection (p = 0.488, 0.124, 0.071 and 0.387, respectively).

Conclusions

Initial and repeat hepatectomy showed similar outcomes of remnant liver regeneration and short- and long-term prognoses.

Liver Resection Versus Embolization for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Despite curative resection, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high probability of recurrence. We validated the potential role of liver resection (LR) for recurrent HCC.

METHODS

Patients with intrahepatic recurrence with up to three lesions were included. We compared survival times of patients undergoing their first LR to those of patients undergoing repeated LR. Then, survival times of the patients who had undergone LR and transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE) for recurrent HCC after propensity score matching were compared.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up period of 3.1 years (range, 0.2-16.3), median overall survival times were 6.5 years (95% CI 6.0-7.0), 5.7 years (5.2-6.2), and 5.1 years (4.9-7.3) for the first LR (n = 1234), second LR (n = 273), and third LR (n = 90) groups, respectively. Severe complications frequently occurred in the first LR group (p = 0.059). Operative times were significantly longer for the third LR group (p = 0.012). After the first recurrence, median survival times after one-to-one pair matching were 5.7 years (95% CI 4.5-6.5) and 3.1 years (2.1-3.8) for the second LR group (n = 146) and TACE group (n = 146), respectively (p < 0.001). The median survival time of the third LR group (n = 41) (6.2 years; 95% CI 3.7-NA) was also longer than that of TACE group (n = 41) (3.4 years; 1.8-4.5; p = 0.010) after the second recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated LR for recurrent HCC is the procedure of choice if there are three or fewer tumors.

Evaluation of adhesion barrier types in a rat hepatectomy-induced adhesion model

Background

Adhesion formation after hepatectomy creates problems for repeat hepatectomy. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a spray (AdSpray) and sheet adhesion barrier (Seprafilm) in a rat hepatectomy-induced adhesion model.

Methods

Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent partial resection of the left lateral liver lobe. They were randomly assigned to control (n = 10), AdSpray (n = 10), and Seprafilm groups. Seven days after surgery, the animals were sacrificed, and adhesions at the hepatic resection surface were blindly evaluated.

Results

In the control group, adhesions were formed in all 10 animals (100%), with a 69% adhesion extent (mean). In the AdSpray group, the incidence of adhesions (40%) and the adhesion extent (mean, 10%) were significantly lower than in the control group (incidence; p = 0.0147, adhesion extent; p = 0.0007). In the Seprafilm group, the incidence of adhesions was 70%. The adhesion extent of Seprafilm (mean, 30%) was significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.0492). No significant differences were observed between the AdSpray and Seprafilm groups. As for histopathological examination, animals in the AdSpray group showed a similar healing profile to that of the control group without delayed healing and regeneration of mesothelial cells. In contrast, the Seprafilm group showed ongoing foreign body reaction to Seprafilm, and regeneration of mesothelial cells was immature at 7 days.

Conclusions

Both the spray-type gel and sheet adhesion barriers significantly reduced adhesion formation after hepatectomy. The spray-type adhesion barrier caused no adverse events and induced favorable healing. These adhesion barriers may be effective in hepatectomy. Further animal studies and clinical trials are required to determine their benefits in clinical use.

Safety of Use of a Sheet-Type Adhesion Barrier (Interceed®) During Liver Surgery

BACKGROUND

Adhesion barriers are increasingly used in hepatobiliary surgery. However, there has been no solid evidence yet in support of their safety.

METHODS

Incidences of global postoperative morbidities and major abdominal morbidities were compared between 101 consecutive patients who received a sheet-type adhesion barrier (Interceed^®) and 134 patients who did not receive any adhesion barriers during hepatectomy. Propensity score (PS) adjustment was used to account for potential bias to receive Interceed.

RESULTS

In the PS-adjusted population, the incidences of both global postoperative morbidities and major abdominal morbidities showed no significant difference between the Interceed group and the control group (17.9% vs. 17.6%; P = 0.948 and 7.8% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.813, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that age + 10 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.15-2.50; P = 0.007), estimated blood loss + 100 mL (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09, P = 0.009), and laparoscopic approach (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.75; P = 0.026) were independent predictors for global postoperative morbidities and operation time + 1 h (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.23-1.96; P < 0.001) was a risk factor for major abdominal morbidity, while no specific association between the use of Interceed and the risk of postoperative morbidity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of Interceed does not increase the risk of postoperative morbidities after hepatectomy.

Liver Resection for Multiple Hepatocellular Carcinomas: A Japanese Nationwide Survey

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the survival benefits of liver resection (LR) compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).

BACKGROUND

Despite significant improvements in diagnostic imaging and the widespread application of screening programs, some patients with HCC continue to present with multiple tumors. The surgical indications for multiple HCCs remain controversial.

METHODS

Among 77,268 patients with HCC reported in a Japanese nationwide survey, 27,164 patients had multiple HCCs. The exclusion criteria were Child-Pugh B/C, treatment other than LR and TACE, >3 tumors, and insufficient available data. Ultimately, 3246 patients (LR: n = 1944, TACE: n = 1302) were included. The survival benefit of LR for patients multiple HCCs was evaluated by using propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

The study group of 2178 patients (LR: n = 1089, TACE: n = 1089) seemed to be well matched. The overall survival rate in the LR group was 60.0% at 5 years, which was higher than that in the TACE group (41.6%, P < 0.001). Among patients with a tumor size of 30 mm or more, LR showed a survival benefit over TACE at 5 years (53.0% vs 32.7%, P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis indicated that age, serum albumin level, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, macrovascular invasion, tumor size, and TACE were independent predictors of poor prognosis in multiple HCCs.

CONCLUSIONS

LR could offer better long-term survival than TACE for patients with multiple HCCs (up to 3 tumors). If patients have good liver function (Child-Pugh A), LR is recommended, even for those with multiple HCCs with tumor sizes of 30 mm or more.

Favorable outcomes of surgical resection for extrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

Repeat resection for intrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is effective for the long-term survival of patients; however, little is known about the surgical outcomes of extrahepatic nodules. The aim of this study is to investigate whether resection can contribute to the survival of patients with extrahepatic recurrent HCC.

METHODS

Under the conditions that intrahepatic recurrent HCC was absent or controlled by locoregional therapies, patients who had resectable extrahepatic recurrent HCC in the lymph nodes, adrenal gland, peritoneum, lung, or brain were included in this study. The survival of patients who did (Surgical group) and did not (Non-surgical group, underwent other therapies) undergo resection for extrahepatic recurrent HCC was compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight and 26 patients were included in the Surgical and Non-surgical groups, respectively. No patient had severe postoperative complications. After a median follow-up of 1.2 (range, 0.2-8.8) years, the median cumulative incidence of extrahepatic recurrent HCC was 1.2 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-3.5) in the Surgical group. The median overall survival was 5.3 (95% CI, 2.5-8.8) and 1.1 (0.8-2.3) years in the Surgical and Non-surgical groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year rates of survival were 60.5% and 9.1% in the Surgical and Non-surgical groups, respectively. Surgical resection, α-fetoprotein, disease-free interval, and metastasis at the adrenal gland were the independent factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the favorable surgical outcomes, resection should be considered as one of the therapeutic choices for patients with extrahepatic recurrent HCC if intrahepatic recurrent HCC can be controlled by locoregional therapies.

A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study of Repeated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Intrahepatic Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Through this multi-institutional study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for intrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 2005 and 2017, 709 patients with 835 HCCs underwent SBRT; those treated with repeated SBRT were eligible. The median prescribed dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients with 189 tumors underwent repeated SBRT (≥ 2 courses [median 2 times; range, 2-5 times]). The median follow-up periods from the first to the second SBRT were 41.5 (range, 12-99) and 20 (range, 1-81) months, respectively. The median interval between the first and second SBRT was 18 (range, 3-74) months. The 5-year local recurrence rate was 6.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3%-13.4%). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and liver-related death rates from the first SBRT were 60.4% (95% CI, 47.0%-73.8%) and 32.9% (95% CI, 20.3%-46.0%), respectively, and the 3-year rates from the second SBRT were 61.0% (95% CI, 49.9%-75.2%) and 34.5% (95% CI, 20.6%-48.9%), respectively. The frequency of grade 3 toxicity was not significantly different between the first and second SBRT (first: 11% [95% CI, 5.2%-20%]; second: 15% [95% CI, 7.9%-24%]; P = .48). Among 39 patients with no intrahepatic recurrence for 1 year after the first and second SBRT, the deterioration in liver function after the first and second SBRT was not significantly different; the albumin-bilirubin score increased 1 year after the first versus second SBRT (first, 0.143 ± 0.23; second, 0.195 ± 0.38; P = .48). Multivariate analysis revealed that the intrahepatic recurrence-free interval was the only significant factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated SBRT for intrahepatic recurrent HCC resulted in high local control with safety and a satisfactory OS comparable with that of other curative local treatments for patients with well-preserved liver function.

Effectiveness and safety of irreversible electroporation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for thermal ablation after surgery

Objectives

To preliminarily evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of computed tomography (CT) image-guided irreversible electroporation (IRE) for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection.

Methods

From January 2016 to February 2018, 18 patients diagnosed with recurrent HCC after surgical resection received IRE under CT image guidance for 22 tumors. Patients were enrolled for IRE when ineligible for thermal ablation due to tumor location. Clinical records and imaging data were reviewed to assess complete ablation rate, local tumor progression free rate (LTPFR), local tumor progression free survival (LTPFS) and complications after a median follow-up time of 14 months.

Results

Successful complete ablations were achieved in 20/22 (90.1%) tumors. Mean LTPFS was 10.5 ​± ​9.4 months. Overall 3-, 6- and 12-months LTPFR in 22 tumors following IRE were 68.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45%–83%), 59.1% (95% CI: 33%–76%) and 36.4% (95% CI: 17%–56%), respectively. Complications included pneumothorax (2/18, 11.1%), localized pain (3/18, 16.7%), bile duct dilation (1/18, 5.6%) and transient hypertension (1/18, 5.6%). No major complications or treatment-related deaths were observed. The alpha-fetoprotein levels of two patients decreased to the normal range at 3 and 4 months, respectively.

Conclusions

This study showed that percutaneous CT image-guided IRE can serve as a safe and effective treatment for recurrent HCC not suitable for thermal ablation.

Timing for removing prophylactic drains after liver resection: an evaluation of drain removal on the third and first postoperative days

Background

Conventionally, drains are removed from postoperative day (POD) 7 to POD 14 at our institute after hepatectomy (control group). This study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of drain removal in the early postoperative period.

Methods

Recently, we defined criteria for the early removal of drains: (I) a drain-fluid bilirubin level of below 3 mg/dL; (II) a drain discharge volume of less than 500 mL/day; and (III) no macroscopic signs of bleeding or infection. For patients meeting these criteria, drains were removed on POD 3 between January 2012 and February 2013 (POD 3 group) and on POD 1 between February and December 2013 (POD 1 group). The outcomes of these groups were then retrospectively compared.

Results

The median duration of the postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the POD 3 group (11 days) than in the control group (14 days) (P<0.0001). The incidence of drain infection was lower in the POD 3 group (1.2%) than in the control group (5.7%). Meanwhile, the incidences of bile leakage and complications were higher in the POD 1 group than in the POD 3 group. However, the incidences were almost the same when patients whose drains were actually removed on the predefined POD were compared. The intraoperative findings were also considered when removing the drains.

Conclusions

Drain removal on POD 3 may reduce the length of the postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of drain infection without impairing safety. To remove drains safely on POD 1, however, the intraoperative findings should also be considered.

Time-to-Interventional Failure as a New Surrogate Measure for Survival Outcomes after Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study sought to investigate the clinical impact of repeated interventions for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to establish a new surrogate measure for survival: the time-to-interventional failure (TIF).

METHODS

Based on a retrospective review of 1158 patients who underwent curative resection for HCC, the abilities of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and TIF, which was defined as the elapsed time from resection to unresectable/unablatable recurrence, to predict overall survival (OS) were compared.

RESULTS

Within a median follow-up period of 84.9 months, 676 (59.0%) recurrence events occurred, 78.1% of which were resectable/ablatable recurrences. Of these, 99.1% of the patients underwent repeated treatments. TIF had a stronger correlation than RFS (r = 0.921 vs. r = 0.631) in prediction of OS. Patients who underwent curative-intent treatment (i.e., resection or ablation) for recurrence showed significantly better survival outcomes compared with those who underwent non-curative treatment (e.g., TACE, chemotherapy) (median OS, 89.1 months vs. 55.0 months; P < 0.0001). This tendency was constant across the AJCC stages and multivariate analysis confirmed that curative-intent treatment is associated with improved survival after initial recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

OS after HCC resection is more strongly dependent on TIF than on RFS. Aggressive curative-intent interventions for recurrent HCC may prolong survival regardless of the cancer stage.

Repeat hepatectomy for patients with early and late recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Repeat hepatectomy is a feasible treatment modality for intrahepatic recurrence after hepatectomy of hepatocellular carcinoma, yet the survival benefit remains ill-defined. The objective of the current study was to define long-term, oncologic outcomes after repeat hepatectomy among patients with early and late recurrence.

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative-intent repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma were identified using a multi-intuitional database. Early and late recurrence was defined by setting 1 year after initial hepatectomy as the cutoff value. Patient clinical characteristics, overall survival, and disease-free survival were compared among patients with early and late recurrence before and after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Among all the patients, 81 had early recurrence and 129 had late recurrence from which 74 matched pairs were included in the propensity score matching analytic cohort. Before propensity score matching, 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival after resection of an early recurrence were 41.7% and 17.9%, respectively, which were worse compared with patients who had resection of a late recurrence (57.0% and 39.4%, both P < .01). After propensity score matching, 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival among patients with early recurrence were worse compared with patients with late recurrence (41.0% and 19.2% vs 64.3% and 43.2%, both P < .01). After adjustment for other confounding factors on multivariable Cox-regression analysis, early recurrence remained independently associated with decreased overall survival and disease-free survival (hazard ratio 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.35-3.34, P = .001; hazard ratio 1.86, 95% confidence 1.26-2.74, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Repeat hepatectomy for early recurrence was associated with worse overall survival and disease-free survival compared with late recurrence. These data may help inform patients and selection of patients being considered for repeat hepatectomy of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

Novel patient risk factors and validation of a difficulty scoring system in laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy

The indications for laparoscopic liver resection have expanded; however, the safety and benefits of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) remain unclear. We retrospectively reviewed data from 137 patients who underwent partial hepatectomy or left lateral sectionectomy without thoracotomy. We compared patients’ clinical factors using a difficulty scoring system for LRH. We defined factors associated with blood loss volumes in the 75th percentile or above as risk factors for bleeding in open repeat hepatectomy, and determined whether these factors were useful for LRH risk assessment. Open repeat hepatectomy and LRH was performed in 96 and 41 patients, respectively. Four of 41 (9.8%) patients undergoing LRH were converted to laparotomy. Blood loss volume was significantly greater in the intermediate-risk group than in the low-risk group (P = 0.046). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of tumours located adjacent and caudal or dorsal to the primary tumour site was an independent risk factor for bleeding in LRH (odds ratio 3.21, 95% confidence interval 1.16–8.88, P = 0.024). Our study validated the usefulness of a difficulty scoring system, identified patient factors that predicted the difficulty of LRH, and presented a novel difficulty scoring system for LRH based on an existing difficulty scoring system.

Assessment of Preoperative Liver Function for Surgical Decision Making in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have underlying liver disease and a preoperative liver function evaluation is important to avoid postoperative liver failure and death. In Western guidelines, portal hypertension (PH) is listed as a contraindication for liver resection. On the other hand, the indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG R15) has been widely used in Asian countries for surgical decision making. However, these criteria are based on reports published in the 20th century that included only a small number of patients and were developed empirically.

SUMMARY

The number of published case series concerning liver resection in HCC patients with PH has been rapidly increasing since 2011, indicating that liver resection in HCC patients with PH is now routinely performed in specialized centers worldwide. Although PH certainly has an impact and should be considered as a contraindication for major liver resection, it is no longer considered to be a contraindication for minor liver resection, especially laparoscopic liver resection. In addition, new biomarkers and imaging tools to assess preoperative liver function have been extensively reported. The combination of these new factors to well-known risk factors, such as PH and ICG R15, might strengthen the ability to stratify the risk of postoperative liver failure.

KEY MESSAGES

The present review covers recent topics regarding the assessment of preoperative liver function for surgical decision making in patients with HCC.

Impact of narrow margin and R1 resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on the salvage liver transplantation strategy. An intention-to-treat analysis

BACKGROUND

No studies have investigated whether narrow margin is a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence outside transplantability criteria. The objective was to assess on an intent-to-treat (ITT) basis whether hepatectomy with narrow margin affects the outcomes in patients enrolled in the salvage liver transplantation (LT) strategy.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2016, patients enrolled in the salvage LT strategy were divided into 2 groups: narrow (<10 mm) vs. wide (≥10 mm) margin groups. R1 resection was defined as positive histologic margin involvement. Recurrence rate, transplantability rate of recurrence and ITT overall survival (ITT-OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were studied: 43 patients with narrow margin and 38 with wide margin. The recurrence rates, pattern and delay of recurrence, transplantability following recurrence, and ITT-OS were similar between the two groups. These results were maintained when comparing patients with R1 resection to those with R0 resection.

CONCLUSION

On an ITT basis, hepatectomy with narrow margin or R1 resection did not impair the transplantability of recurrence and survival of patients enrolled in the salvage LT strategy. Narrow margin and even R1 resection following hepatectomy in the setting of salvage LT strategy should not be the basis for altering the strategy.

Predicting surgical site infections using a novel nomogram in patients with hepatocelluar carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSI) remain a major cause of morbidity after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

AIM

To identify the risk factors associated with SSI, and develop a nomogram to predict SSI among patients undergoing hepatectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients diagnosed with HCC undergoing hepatectomy at two academic institutions in China, and evaluated the occurrence of SSI. Independent risk factors for SSI were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. Based on these independent risk factors, a nomogram was established using the data of patients in the first institution, and was validated using data from an external independent cohort from the second institution.

RESULTS

The nomogram was established using data from 309 patients, whereas the validation cohort used data from 331 patients. The operation duration, serum albumin level, repeat hepatectomy, and ASA score were identified as independent risk factors. The concordance index (C-index) of the nomogram for SSI prediction in the training cohort was 0.86; this nomogram also performed well in the external validation cohort, with a C-index of 0.84. Accordingly, we stratified patients into three groups, with a distinct risk range based on the nomogram prediction, to guide clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Our novel nomogram offers good preoperative prediction for SSIs in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

The tumor diameter cut-off for predicting microscopic intrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients without treatment history differs from that of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with a treatment history

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Intrahepatic metastasis (IM) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs via vascular invasion; the tumor diameter that affects the risk of micro intra-hepatic metastasis (MIM) should be larger than that which affects the risk of micro vessel invasion (MVI). The aim of the present study was to determine the optimum tumor diameter cut-off value for predicting the presence of MIM in HCC patients without treatment history and HCC patients with a treatment history and to compare these diameters between cases of MVI and MIM.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 621 patients without macroscopic vessel invasion or intrahepatic metastasis on preoperative imaging who underwent hepatectomy. The cut-off tumor diameter for predicting the presence of MIM was determined by a receiver operating characteristic curves analysis.

RESULTS

The optimum cut-off value for predicting the presence of MIM in HCC patients without treatment history was 43 mm. In contrast, the optimum cut-off value for predicting the presence of MIM in HCC patients with a treatment history was 20 mm. Among 46 HCC patients with MIM without treatment history, there were 20 patients with MIM without MVI who were considered to have potential multi-centric (MC) tumors rather than IM. The cumulative overall survival rates in patients with MIM without MVI (potential MC) was significantly better than that in patients with both MIM and MVI (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The tumor diameter cut-off value for predicting MIM differed between HCC patients without treatment history and with a treatment history and slightly smaller than those for predicting MVI beyond our expectation.

Liver Regeneration is Preserved After At Least Four Repeated Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Repeated resection is known to prolong survival, with an acceptable morbidity rate, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, little is known about the effect of repeated liver resection on postoperative liver regeneration and liver function. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of repeated liver resections on the postoperative liver regeneration rate and liver function.

METHODS

A total of 71 patients, who had undergone more than three liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma between May 2001 and December 2013 at a tertiary care hospital in Japan, were included in the analysis. Among them, CT-volumetric data for the first, second, third, and fourth or more resections were available for 36, 49, 53, and 24 patients. We analyzed the regeneration index (RI) defined as the postoperative TLV/preoperative TLV × 100 was calculated after each operation to measure the degree of regeneration. Liver function was evaluated using the indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15).

RESULTS

No significant differences in RI were observed among the first, second, and third or more liver resection groups. No significant difference in the ICG R15 value was seen between the first liver resection group and the second or more liver resection group (P = 0.75). However, a significant difference in the RI was observed when the 1 segmentectomy or less liver resection group (median [range] RI 98.1 [72.9-119.9]) was compared with the 2 or more segmentectomy group (median [range] RI 90.5 [62.6-113.6]) (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The regeneration process is maintained after as many as four repeated resections. Patients with sustained liver function can safely undergo repeated liver resections for recurrences of HCC.

Systematic review of treatment strategy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: Salvage liver transplantation or curative locoregional therapy

AIMS

The aim of our systematic review was to compare the efficacy of salvage liver transplantation (SLT) versus curative locoregional therapy (CLRT) for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Studies comparing the SLT with CLRT for patients with recurrent HCC were selected from database of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. The outcomes including overall survival, disease-free survival, and complications were abstracted. Individual and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval of each outcome was analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven retrospective studies involving 840 patients were included. There is no difference between SLT and CLRT group regarding the1- and 3-year overall survival rates. However, the 5-year overall survival and 1-, 3-, 5-year disease-free survival were significantly higher after SLT than after CLRT (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.09-2.39, P = .02; OR = 4.08, 95% CI 1.95-8.54, P = .0002; OR = 3.63, 95% CI 2.21-5.95, P <.00001; OR = 5.71, 95% CI 2.63-12.42, P <.0001, respectively). But CLRT was associated with fewer complications and shorter hospital-stay compared with SLT. For SLT compared with repeat hepatectomy (RH), the subgroup analysis indicated that SLT group had a significantly higher 3- and 5-years disease-free survival than the RH group (OR = 3.23, 95% CI 1.45-7.20, P = .004; OR = 4.79, 95% CI 1.88-12.25, P = .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of SLT may be superior to that of CLRT in the treatment of recurrent HCC. However, considering the similar overall survival rate and current situation of donor shortage, RH is still an important option for recurrence HCC.

Efficacy of Percutaneous Thermal Ablation Combined With Transarterial Embolization for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy and a Prognostic Nomogram to Predict Survival

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous thermal ablation combined with transarterial embolization for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy and establish a prognostic nomogram to predict survival.

METHODS

One hundred seventeen patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma receiving ablation from 2009 to 2014 were included in primary cohort to establish a prognostic nomogram. Between 2014 and 2016, 51 patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma treated by ablation were enrolled in the validation cohort to validate the predictive accuracy of the nomogram. All patients underwent locoregional ablation. Overall survival was the primary end point, and progression-free survival was the second end point. The performance of the nomogram was assessed through concordance index and calibration curve and compared with 5 conventional hepatocellular carcinoma staging systems.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of primary cohort were 88.4%, 70.7%, and 64.1%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year progression-free survival rates of primary cohort were 44%, 14%, and 8.7%, respectively. The results of multivariate analysis showed that tumor size ( P = .0469; hazard ratio, 1.020; 95% confidence interval, 1.0004-1.040), preoperative extrahepatic disease ( P = .0675; hazard ratio, 2.604; 95% confidence interval, 0.933-7.264), and close to hepatic hilum <2 cm ( P = .0053; hazard ratio, 3.691; 95% confidence interval, 1.474-9.240) were predictive factors for overall survival. The study established a nomogram to predict survival (concordance index, 0.752; 95% confidence interval, 0.656-0.849). According to the predicted overall survival, patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma were divided into 3 risk classes ( P < .05): low-risk group (total score <55; predicted 5-year overall survival rate, 82.9%), intermediate-risk group (55 ≤ total score < 99; predicted 5-year overall survival rate, 52.8%), and high-risk group (hazard ratio, total score ≥99; predicted 5-year overall survival rate, not available).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous thermal ablation appears to be an effective procedure for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. The proposed nomogram provides a mechanism to accurately predict survival and could stratify risk among patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma treated by ablation therapy.

The Predictors of Microscopic Vessel Invasion Differ Between Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma with a Treatment History

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Previous studies have shown that microscopic vessel invasion (MVI) occurs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a treatment history due to its poorer malignant behavior in comparison with primary HCC. The aim of the present study was to determine the predictors of MVI and overall survival in HCC patients with a treatment history.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 580 patients who underwent hepatectomy and whose preoperative imaging showed no evidence of macroscopic vessel invasion. The patients were classified into two groups: primary HCC (n = 425) and HCC with a treatment history (n = 155). MVI was defined as the presence of either microscopic portal vein invasion or venous invasion, which was invisible on preoperative imaging.

RESULTS

MVI was identified in 34 (21.9%) patients with a treatment history. A multivariate analysis showed that a high des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (odds ratio [OR] 5.16, P = 0.002) and a large tumor diameter (OR 2.57, P = 0.030) were the significant predictor of MVI in HCC with a treatment history. Moreover, the presence of MVI (hazard ratio [HR] 2.27, P = 0.001) and tumor diameter >27 mm (HR 2.04, P = 0.006) remained significant predictors of the overall survival in HCC with a treatment history. The tumor diameter cutoff value for predicting MVI (27 mm) in HCC with a treatment history was smaller than in primary HCC (37 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of MVI was a significant predictor in the HCC patients with a treatment history. The tumor diameter is an important factor that can be used to predict the presence of MVI, especially in HCC with a treatment history.

Parenchyma-sparing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in left lateral section is associated with better liver volume recovery

BACKGROUND

Left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) is frequently performed for surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located in the left lateral section. However, no reports have described liver resection for such HCCs using a parenchyma-sparing strategy involving anatomic resection (AR) of segment II (S2 AR) or segment III (S3 AR).

METHODS

From 1994 to 2014, patients who underwent LLS and S2 AR or S3 AR for HCC were included in the analysis. Short- and long-term outcomes and pre- and postoperative LV were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 89 patients selected, 49 underwent LLS (LLS group) and 40 underwent S2 AR and S3 AR (S2/S3 AR group). The postoperative LV was not significantly smaller than the preoperative LV in the S2/S3 AR group (p = 0.114), whereas the postoperative LV was significantly smaller in the LLS group (p = 0.019). The overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) rates were not significantly different between the groups (OS, p = 0.056; RFS, p = 0.102).

CONCLUSIONS

Parenchyma-sparing liver resection for HCC in the left lateral section is associated with better postoperative LV recovery than LLS with similar oncological outcomes. S2/S3 AR can be a reasonable therapeutic option when LLS results in the removal of more parenchyma than necessary.

Multidisciplinary management of recurrent and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: an international expert consensus

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth-most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. However, 40-70% patients eventually suffer from postoperative recurrence within 5 years. HCC recurrence after surgery severely affects prognosis of the patients. Nevertheless, there is an opportunity to improve patients' prognosis if doctors and researchers can recognize the importance of a standardized perioperative management and study it in clinical and pre-clinical settings. Hence, based on our own experience and published studies from other researchers, we develop this consensus regarding multidisciplinary management of locally recurrent and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma after resection. This consensus consists of the entire course of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) management, including prediction of recurrence, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and surveillance of RHCC. Consensus recommendations are presented with grades of evidences (Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb, III and IV), and strength of recommendations (A, B, C, D and E). We also develop a decision-making path for RHCC treatment, which can intuitively demonstrate the management for RHCC. It is hoped that we may make some effort to standardize the management of RHCC and ultimately understand how to improve outcomes.

Resection for recurrent pancreatic cancer in the remnant pancreas after pancreatectomy is clinically promising: Results of a project study for pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

BACKGROUND

A therapeutic strategy has not been established for recurrent pancreatic cancer in the remnant pancreas. The purpose of this multicenter survey was to clarify the clinical features of remnant pancreatic cancer and to assess the appropriate operative indications.

METHODS

Clinical data from 114 patients with remnant pancreatic cancer after initial pancreatectomy were collected retrospectively. Clinicopathologic factors and overall survival curves were analyzed, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were evaluated.

RESULTS

Variate analysis revealed that age (≥65 years), body mass index (<20 kg/m²), tumor size (≥20 mm), distance from the pancreatic stump (<10 mm), and resection of the remnant pancreatic cancer were significant prognostic factors. The median survival times of the resected (n = 90) and the nonresected group (n = 24) were 26 and 14 months, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.56; P = .012). When the patients were classified based on recurrence patterns after a second pancreatectomy, the median survival times were 30.5 months in the no recurrence group, 32.0 in the local recurrence group, and 23.0 in the distant metastasis group. A total of 8.9% of the patients had a postoperative complication of Clavien-Dindo classification III or higher, and the 90-day mortality rate was 1.1%.

CONCLUSION

Resection of the remnant pancreatic cancer could offer a favorable outcome and a chance for a cure. In particular, a young and healthy patient with a relatively small tumor at least 10 mm away from the pancreatic stump appears to be the best candidate for reoperation. Furthermore, the safety profile of resection is acceptable.