Injury Characteristics and von Willebrand Factor for the Prediction of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Burn Injury: Development and Internal Validation

Role of biomarkers and molecular signaling pathways in acute lung injury

BACKGROUND

Acute lung injury (ALI) is caused by bacterial, fungal, and viral infections. When pathogens invade the lungs, the immune system responds by producing cytokines, chemokines, and interferons to promote the infiltration of phagocytic cells, which are essential for pathogen clearance. Their excess production causes an overactive immune response and a pathological hyper-inflammatory state, which leads to ALI. Until now, there is no particular pharmaceutical treatment available for ALI despite known inflammatory mediators like neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and reactive oxygen species (ROS).

OBJECTIVES

Therefore, the primary objective of this review is to provide the clear overview on the mechanisms controlling NETs, ROS formation, and other relevant processes during the pathogenesis of ALI. In addition, we have discussed the significance of epithelial and endothelial damage indicators and several molecular signaling pathways associated with ALI.

METHODS

The literature review was done from Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar for ALI, NETs, ROS, inflammation, biomarkers, Toll- and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors, alveolar damage, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and epithelial/endothelial damage alone or in combination.

RESULTS

This review summarized the main clinical signs of ALI, including the regulation and distinct function of epithelial and endothelial biomarkers, NETs, ROS, and pattern recognition receptors (PRRs).

CONCLUSION

However, no particular drugs including vaccine for ALI has been established. Furthermore, there is a lack of validated diagnostic tools and a poor predictive rationality of current therapeutic biomarkers. Hence, extensive and precise research is required to speed up the process of drug testing and development by the application of artificial intelligence technologies, structure-based drug design, in-silico approaches, and drug repurposing.

Incidence, mortality, and predictive factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in multiple trauma patients living in high-altitude areas: a retrospective study in Shigatse

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe complication that can lead to fatalities in multiple trauma patients. Nevertheless, the incidence rate and early prediction of ARDS among multiple trauma patients residing in high-altitude areas remain unknown.

Methods

This study included a total of 168 multiple trauma patients who received treatment at Shigatse People's Hospital Intensive Care Unit (ICU) between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021. The clinical characteristics of the patients and the incidence rate of ARDS were assessed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were employed to identify potential risk factors for ARDS, and the predictive effects of these risk factors were analyzed.

Results

In the high-altitude area, the incidence of ARDS among multiple trauma patients was 37.5% (63/168), with a hospital mortality rate of 16.1% (27/168). Injury Severity Score (ISS) and thoracic injuries were identified as significant predictors for ARDS using the logistic regression model, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 and 0.75, respectively. Furthermore, a novel predictive risk score combining ISS and thoracic injuries demonstrated improved predictive ability, achieving an AUC of 0.82.

Conclusions

This study presents the incidence of ARDS in multiple trauma patients residing in the Tibetan region, and identifies two critical predictive factors along with a risk score for early prediction of ARDS. These findings have the potential to enhance clinicians' ability to accurately assess the risk of ARDS and proactively prevent its onset.

Novel models for early prediction and prevention of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients following hepatectomy: A clinical translational study based on 1,032 patients

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a serious organ failure and postoperative complication. However, the incidence rate, early prediction and prevention of postoperative ARDS in patients undergoing hepatectomy remain unidentified.

Methods

A total of 1,032 patients undergoing hepatectomy between 2019 and 2020, at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were included. Patients in 2019 and 2020 were used as the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The incidence rate of ARDS was assessed. A logistic regression model and a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model were used for constructing ARDS prediction models.

Results

The incidence of ARDS was 8.8% (43/490) in the development cohort and 5.7% (31/542) in the validation cohort. Operation time, postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) were all critical predictors identified by the logistic regression model, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.804 in the development cohort and 0.752 in the validation cohort. Additionally, nine predictors were identified by the LASSO regression model, with an AUC of 0.848 in the development cohort and 0.786 in the validation cohort.

Conclusion

We reported the incidence of ARDS in patients undergoing hepatectomy and developed two simple and practical prediction models for early predicting postoperative ARDS in patients undergoing hepatectomy. These tools may improve clinicians' ability to early estimate the risk of postoperative ARDS and timely prevent its emergence.

NETosis in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury following cutaneous chemical burns

Despite the high morbidity and mortality among patients with extensive cutaneous burns in the intensive care unit due to the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome, effective therapeutics remain to be determined. This is primarily because the mechanisms leading to acute lung injury (ALI) in these patients remain unknown. We test the hypothesis that cutaneous chemical burns promote lung injury due to systemic activation of neutrophils, in particular, toxicity mediated by the deployment of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). We also demonstrate the potential benefit of a peptidyl arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) inhibitor to prevent NETosis and to preserve microvascular endothelial barrier function, thus reducing the severity of ALI in mice. Our data demonstrated that phenylarsine oxide (PAO) treatment of neutrophils caused increased intracellular Ca²⁺-associated PAD4 activity. A dermal chemical burn by lewisite or PAO resulted in PAD4 activation, NETosis, and ALI. NETs disrupted the barrier function of endothelial cells in human lung microvascular endothelial cell spheroids. Citrullinated histone 3 alone caused ALI in mice. Pharmacologic or genetic abrogation of PAD4 inhibited lung injury following cutaneous chemical burns. Cutaneous burns by lewisite and PAO caused ALI by PAD4-mediated NETosis. PAD4 inhibitors may have potential as countermeasures to suppress detrimental lung injury after chemical burns.

Endothelial Damage in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The pulmonary endothelium is a metabolically active continuous monolayer of squamous endothelial cells that internally lines blood vessels and mediates key processes involved in lung homoeostasis. Many of these processes are disrupted in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is marked among others by diffuse endothelial injury, intense activation of the coagulation system and increased capillary permeability. Most commonly occurring in the setting of sepsis, ARDS is a devastating illness, associated with increased morbidity and mortality and no effective pharmacological treatment. Endothelial cell damage has an important role in the pathogenesis of ARDS and several biomarkers of endothelial damage have been tested in determining prognosis. By further understanding the endothelial pathobiology, development of endothelial-specific therapeutics might arise. In this review, we will discuss the underlying pathology of endothelial dysfunction leading to ARDS and emerging therapies. Furthermore, we will present a brief overview demonstrating that endotheliopathy is an important feature of hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19).

Inhalation Injury: Unmet Clinical Needs and Future Research

Pulmonary and systemic insults from inhalation injury can complicate the care of burn patients and contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. However, recent progress in diagnosis and treatment of inhalation injury has not kept pace with the care of cutaneous thermal injury. There are many challenges unique to inhalation injury that have slowed advancement, including deficiencies in our understanding of its pathophysiology, the relative difficulty and subjectivity of bronchoscopic diagnosis, the lack of diagnostic biomarkers, the necessarily urgent manner in which decisions are made about intubation, and the lack of universal recommendations for the application of mucolytics, anticoagulants, bronchodilators, modified ventilator strategies, and other measures. This review represents a summary of critical shortcomings in our understanding and management of inhalation injury identified by the American Burn Association's working group on Cutaneous Thermal Injury and Inhalation Injury in 2018. It addresses our current understanding of the diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment of inhalation injury and highlights topics in need of additional research, including 1) airway repair mechanisms; 2) the airway microbiome in health and after injury; and 3) candidate biomarkers of inhalation injury.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common cause of respiratory failure in critically ill patients and is defined by the acute onset of noncardiogenic pulmonary oedema, hypoxaemia and the need for mechanical ventilation. ARDS occurs most often in the setting of pneumonia, sepsis, aspiration of gastric contents or severe trauma and is present in ~10% of all patients in intensive care units worldwide. Despite some improvements, mortality remains high at 30-40% in most studies. Pathological specimens from patients with ARDS frequently reveal diffuse alveolar damage, and laboratory studies have demonstrated both alveolar epithelial and lung endothelial injury, resulting in accumulation of protein-rich inflammatory oedematous fluid in the alveolar space. Diagnosis is based on consensus syndromic criteria, with modifications for under-resourced settings and in paediatric patients. Treatment focuses on lung-protective ventilation; no specific pharmacotherapies have been identified. Long-term outcomes of patients with ARDS are increasingly recognized as important research targets, as many patients survive ARDS only to have ongoing functional and/or psychological sequelae. Future directions include efforts to facilitate earlier recognition of ARDS, identifying responsive subsets of patients and ongoing efforts to understand fundamental mechanisms of lung injury to design specific treatments.