1
|
Lopez-Lopez V, Morise Z, Albaladejo-González M, Gavara CG, Goh BKP, Koh YX, Paul SJ, Hilal MA, Mishima K, Krürger JAP, Herman P, Cerezuela A, Brusadin R, Kaizu T, Lujan J, Rotellar F, Monden K, Dalmau M, Gotohda N, Kudo M, Kanazawa A, Kato Y, Nitta H, Amano S, Valle RD, Giuffrida M, Ueno M, Otsuka Y, Asano D, Tanabe M, Itano O, Minagawa T, Eshmuminov D, Herrero I, Ramírez P, Ruipérez-Valiente JA, Robles-Campos R, Wakabayashi G. Explainable artificial intelligence prediction-based model in laparoscopic liver surgery for segments 7 and 8: an international multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2411-2422. [PMID: 38315197 PMCID: PMC11078826 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10681-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more useful as a decision-making and outcomes predictor tool. We have developed AI models to predict surgical complexity and the postoperative course in laparoscopic liver surgery for segments 7 and 8. METHODS We included patients with lesions located in segments 7 and 8 operated by minimally invasive liver surgery from an international multi-institutional database. We have employed AI models to predict surgical complexity and postoperative outcomes. Furthermore, we have applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to make the AI models interpretable. Finally, we analyzed the surgeries not converted to open versus those converted to open. RESULTS Overall, 585 patients and 22 variables were included. Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) showed the highest performance for predicting surgery complexity and Random Forest (RF) for predicting postoperative outcomes. SHAP detected that MLP and RF gave the highest relevance to the variables "resection type" and "largest tumor size" for predicting surgery complexity and postoperative outcomes. In addition, we explored between surgeries converted to open and non-converted, finding statistically significant differences in the variables "tumor location," "blood loss," "complications," and "operation time." CONCLUSION We have observed how the application of SHAP allows us to understand the predictions of AI models in surgical complexity and the postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic liver surgery in segments 7 and 8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Lopez-Lopez
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Zeniche Morise
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan
| | | | - Concepción Gomez Gavara
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona Autonomic University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ye Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sijberden Jasper Paul
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Kohei Mishima
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Jaime Arthur Pirola Krürger
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Paulo Herman
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alvaro Cerezuela
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Roberto Brusadin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Takashi Kaizu
- Department of General, Pediatric and Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Juan Lujan
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mar Dalmau
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona Autonomic University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Naoto Gotohda
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Masashi Kudo
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Akishige Kanazawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nitta
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Satoshi Amano
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | | | - Mario Giuffrida
- General Surgery Unit, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Masaki Ueno
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama City, Wakayama, Japan
| | | | - Daisuke Asano
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Itano
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takuya Minagawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Dilmurodjon Eshmuminov
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irene Herrero
- Department of Surgery, Getafe University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Ramírez
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Phillips BT, Bejar-Chapa M, Chaya BF, Chi D, Gonzalez SR, Hussein S, Marji FP, Muller J, Patel NK, Scarabosio A, Thacoor A. Spotlight in Plastic Surgery: January 2024. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153:270-272. [PMID: 38127454 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000011064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
|
3
|
Hassan AM, Paidisetty P, Ray N, Govande JG, Nelson JA, Mehrara BJ, Butler CE, Mericli AF, Selber JC. Frail but Resilient: Frailty in Autologous Breast Reconstruction is Associated with Worse Surgical Outcomes but Equivalent Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:659-671. [PMID: 37864119 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14412-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty is associated with higher risk of complications following breast reconstruction, but its impact on long-term surgical and patient-reported outcomes has not been investigated. We examined the association of the five-item modified frailty index (MFI) score with long-term surgical and patient-reported outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy and autologous breast reconstruction between January 2016 and April 2022. Primary outcome was any flap-related complication. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes and predictors of complications in the frail cohort. RESULTS We identified 1640 reconstructions (mean follow-up 24.2 ± 19.2 months). In patients with MFI ≥ 2, the odds of surgical [odds ratio (OR) 2.13, p = 0.023] and medical (OR 17.02, p < 0.001) complications were higher than in nonfrail patients. We found no significant difference in satisfaction with the breast (p = 0.287), psychosocial well-being (p = 0.119), or sexual well-being (p = 0.314) according to MFI score. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was an independent predictor of infection (OR 3.70, p = 0.002). Tobacco use (OR 7.13, p = 0.002) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (OR 2.36, p = 0.014) were independent predictors of wound dehiscence. Dependent functional status (OR 2.36, p = 0.007) and immediate reconstruction (compared with delayed reconstruction; OR 3.16, p = 0.026) were independent predictors of skin flap necrosis. Dependent functional status was also independently associated with higher odds of reoperation (OR 2.64, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION Frailty is associated with higher risk of complications in breast reconstruction, but there is no significant difference in long-term patient-reported outcomes. MFI should be considered in breast reconstruction to improve outcomes in high-risk frail patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas M Hassan
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Praneet Paidisetty
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicholas Ray
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janhavi G Govande
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Babak J Mehrara
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles E Butler
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander F Mericli
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hassan AM, Elias AM, Nguyen HT, Nelson JA, Mehrara BJ, Butler CE, Selber JC. The Skin Necrosis Conundrum: Examining Long-term Outcomes and Risk Factors in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 43:NP898-NP907. [PMID: 37431880 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) is a common complication following mastectomy that causes significant distress to patients and physicians and also compromises oncologic, surgical, and quality-of-life outcomes. OBJECTIVES We sought to investigate the long-term outcomes of MSFN following implant-based reconstruction (IBR) and determine the rates and predictors of post-MSFN complications. METHODS This was a 20-year analysis of consecutive adult (>18 years) patients who developed MSFN following mastectomy and IBR from January 2001 to January 2021. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with post-MSFN complications. RESULTS We identified 148 reconstructions, with a mean follow-up time of 86.6 ± 52.9 months. The mean time from reconstruction to MSFN was 13.3 ± 10.4 days, and most cases (n = 84, 56.8%) were full-thickness injuries. Most cases (63.5%) were severe, 14.9% were moderate, and 21.6% were mild. Forty-six percent (n = 68) developed a breast-related complication, with infection being the most common (24%). An independent predictor of overall complications was longer time from reconstruction to MSFN (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; P = .040). Aging was an independent predictor of overall complications (OR, 1.86; P = .038); infection (OR, 1.72; P = .005); and dehiscence (OR, 6.18; P = .037). Independent predictors of dehiscence were longer interval from reconstruction to MSFN (OR, 3.23; P = .018) and larger expander/implant size (OR, 1.49; P = .024). Independent predictors of explantation were larger expander/implant size (OR, 1.20; P = .006) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (OR, 5.61; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS MSFN is associated with high risk of complications following IBR. Awareness of the timing and severity of MSFN and the predictors of post-MSFN complications is crucial for guiding evidence-based decision-making and improving outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
|
5
|
Hassan AM, Nelson JA, Coert JH, Mehrara BJ, Selber JC. Exploring the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: Insights from a Conversation with ChatGPT. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3875-3878. [PMID: 37017834 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13347-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas M Hassan
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Henk Coert
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Babak J Mehrara
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jesse C Selber
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Asaad M, Lu SC, Hassan AM, Kambhampati P, Mitchell D, Chang EI, Yu P, Hanasono MM, Sidey-Gibbons C. The Use of Machine Learning for Predicting Complications of Free-Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2343-2352. [PMID: 36719569 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13053-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Machine learning has been increasingly used for surgical outcome prediction, yet applications in head and neck reconstruction are not well-described. In this study, we developed and evaluated the performance of ML algorithms in predicting postoperative complications in head and neck free-flap reconstruction. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive review of patients who underwent microvascular head and neck reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2018. Data were used to develop and evaluate nine supervised ML algorithms in predicting overall complications, major recipient-site complication, and total flap loss. RESULTS We identified 4000 patients who met inclusion criteria. Overall, 33.7% of patients experienced a complication, 26.5% experienced a major recipient-site complication, and 1.7% suffered total flap loss. The k-nearest neighbors algorithm demonstrated the best overall performance for predicting any complication (AUROC = 0.61, sensitivity = 0.60). Regularized regression had the best performance for predicting major recipient-site complications (AUROC = 0.68, sensitivity = 0.66), and decision trees were the best predictors of total flap loss (AUROC = 0.66, sensitivity = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS ML accurately identified patients at risk of experiencing postsurgical complications, including total flap loss. Predictions from ML models may provide insight in the perioperative setting and facilitate shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malke Asaad
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sheng-Chieh Lu
- Department of Symptom Research, MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abbas M Hassan
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Praneeth Kambhampati
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Mitchell
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Edward I Chang
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peirong Yu
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew M Hanasono
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C Sidey-Gibbons
- Department of Symptom Research, MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hassan AM, Rajesh A, Asaad M, Jonas NA, Coert JH, Mehrara BJ, Butler CE. A Surgeon's Guide to Artificial Intelligence-Driven Predictive Models. Am Surg 2023; 89:11-19. [PMID: 35588764 PMCID: PMC9674797 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221103648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) focuses on processing and interpreting complex information as well as identifying relationships and patterns among complex data. Artificial intelligence- and machine learning (ML)-driven predictions have shown promising potential in influencing real-time decisions and improving surgical outcomes by facilitating screening, diagnosis, risk assessment, preoperative planning, and shared decision-making. Fundamental understanding of the algorithms, as well as their development and interpretation, is essential for the evolution of AI in surgery. In this article, we provide surgeons with a fundamental understanding of AI-driven predictive models through an overview of common ML and deep learning algorithms, model development, performance metrics and interpretation. This would serve as a basis for understanding ML-based research, while fostering new ideas and innovations for furthering the reach of this emerging discipline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas M. Hassan
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aashish Rajesh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Malke Asaad
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nelson A. Jonas
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J. Henk Coert
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Babak J. Mehrara
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Charles E. Butler
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Spotlight in Plastic Surgery: January 2023. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151:232-234. [PMID: 36576833 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
9
|
Hassan AM, Biaggi-Ondina A, Rajesh A, Asaad M, Nelson JA, Coert JH, Mehrara BJ, Butler CE. Predicting Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Surgery Using Machine Learning. Am Surg 2023; 89:31-35. [PMID: 35722685 PMCID: PMC9759616 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221109478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) enable providers to identify differences in treatment effectiveness, postoperative recovery, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. By allowing a shift from disease-specific factors to the patient perspective, PROs provide a tailored patient-centric approach to shared decision-making. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques can facilitate such shared decision-making and improve patient outcomes by accurate prediction of PROs. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the use of AI and ML models in predicting PROs following surgery through an overview of common predictive algorithms and modeling techniques, as well as current applications and limitations in the surgical field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas M. Hassan
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Biaggi-Ondina
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aashish Rajesh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Malke Asaad
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jonas A. Nelson
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Henk Coert
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Babak J. Mehrara
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles E. Butler
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hassan AM, Rajesh A, Asaad M, Jonas NA, Coert JH, Mehrara BJ, Butler CE. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prediction of Surgical Complications: Current State, Applications, and Implications. Am Surg 2023; 89:25-30. [PMID: 35562124 PMCID: PMC9653510 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221101488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Surgical complications pose significant challenges for surgeons, patients, and health care systems as they may result in patient distress, suboptimal outcomes, and higher health care costs. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven models have revolutionized the field of surgery by accurately identifying patients at high risk of developing surgical complications and by overcoming several limitations associated with traditional statistics-based risk calculators. This article aims to provide an overview of AI in predicting surgical complications using common machine learning and deep learning algorithms and illustrates how this can be utilized to risk stratify patients preoperatively. This can form the basis for discussions on informed consent based on individualized patient factors in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas M. Hassan
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aashish Rajesh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Malke Asaad
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nelson A. Jonas
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J. Henk. Coert
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Babak J. Mehrara
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles E. Butler
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Novel Machine Learning Approach for the Prediction of Hernia Recurrence, Surgical Complication, and 30-Day Readmission after Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:918-927. [DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|