1
|
Ng AP, Kim S, Chervu N, Gao Z, Mallick S, Benharash P, Lee H. Disparities in outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery among adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0308938. [PMID: 39190755 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disparities in colorectal cancer screening have been documented among people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). However, surgical outcomes in this population have yet to be studied. The present work aimed to evaluate the association of IDD with outcomes following colorectal cancer resection. METHODS All adults undergoing resection for colorectal cancer in the 2011-2020 National Inpatient Sample were identified. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were developed to examine the association of IDD with risk factors as well as outcomes including mortality, complications, costs, length of stay (LOS), and non-home discharge. The study is limited by its retrospective nature and did not capture disease staging or time of diagnosis. RESULTS Among 722,736 patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection, 2,846 (0.39%) had IDD. Compared to patients without IDD, IDD patients were younger and had a higher burden of comorbidities. IDD status was associated with increased odds of non-elective admission (AOR 1.40 [95% CI 1.14-1.73]) and decreased odds of treatment at high-volume centers (AOR 0.64 [95% CI 0.51-0.81]). Furthermore, IDD patients experienced significantly greater LOS (9 vs 6 days, p<0.001) and hospitalization costs ($23,500 vs $19,800, p<0.001) relative to neurotypical patients. Upon risk adjustment, IDD was significantly associated with 2-fold increased odds of mortality (AOR 2.34 [95% CI 1.48-3.71]), 1.4-fold increase in complications (AOR 1.41 [95% CI 1.15-1.74]), and 6.8-fold increase in non-home discharge (AOR 6.83 [95% CI 5.46-8.56]). CONCLUSIONS IDD patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection experience increased likelihood of non-elective admission, adverse clinical outcomes, and resource use. Our findings highlight the need for more accessible screening and patient-centered interventions to improve quality of surgical care for this at-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha P Ng
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Shineui Kim
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Nikhil Chervu
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Zihan Gao
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Saad Mallick
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luo WY, Varvoglis DN, Agala CB, Comer LH, Shetty P, Wood T, Kapadia MR, Stem JM, Guillem JG. Disparities in Outcomes following Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:3798-3807. [PMID: 39057152 PMCID: PMC11275254 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31070280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Surgical margins following rectal cancer resection impact oncologic outcomes. We examined the relationship between margin status and race, ethnicity, region of care, and facility type. Patients undergoing resection of a stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) between 2004 and 2018 were identified through the National Cancer Database. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed, with margin positivity rate as the outcome of interest, and race/ethnicity and region of care as the predictors of interest. In total, 58,389 patients were included. After IPTW adjustment, non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients were 12% (p = 0.029) more likely to have margin positivity than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. Patients in the northeast were 9% less likely to have margin positivity compared to those in the south. In the west, NHB patients were more likely to have positive margins than NHW patients. Care in academic/research centers was associated with lower likelihood of positive margins compared to community centers. Within academic/research centers, NHB patients were more likely to have positive margins than non-Hispanic Other patients. Our results suggest that disparity in surgical management of LARC in NHB patients exists across regions of the country and facility types. Further research aimed at identifying drivers of this disparity is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - José G. Guillem
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7081, USA (D.N.V.); (C.B.A.); (J.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dualeh SH, Powell CA, Kunnath N, Corriere MA, Ibrahim AM. Rate of Emergency Lower Extremity Amputations in the United States Among Medicare Beneficiaries. Ann Surg 2024; 279:714-719. [PMID: 37753648 PMCID: PMC10939986 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the rate of emergency versus elective lower extremity amputations in the United States. BACKGROUND Lower extremity amputation is a common endpoint for patients with poorly controlled diabetes and multilevel peripheral vascular disease. Although the procedure is ideally performed electively, patients with limited access may present later and require an emergency operation. To what extent rates of emergency amputation for lower extremities vary across the United States is unknown. METHODS Evaluation of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent lower extremity amputation between 2015 and 2020. The rate was determined for each zip code and placed into rank order from lowest to highest rate. We merged each beneficiary's place of residence and location of care with the American Hospital Association Annual Survey using Google Maps Application Programming Interface to determine the travel distance for patients to undergo their procedure. RESULTS Of 233,084 patients, 66.3% (154,597) were men, 69.8% (162,786) were White. The average age (SD) was 74 years (8). There was wide variation in rates of emergency lower extremity amputation. The lowest quintile of zip codes demonstrated an emergency amputation rate of 3.7%, whereas the highest quintile demonstrated 90%. The median travel distance in the lowest emergency surgery rate quintile was 34.6 miles compared with 10.5 miles in the highest quintile of emergency surgery ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS There is wide variation in the rate of emergency lower extremity amputations among Medicare beneficiaries, suggesting variable access to essential vascular care. Travel distance and rate of amputation have an inverse relationship, suggesting that barriers other than travel distance are playing a role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shukri H.A. Dualeh
- University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI
- University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Chloe A. Powell
- University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI
- University of Michigan, Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Nicholas Kunnath
- University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Matthew A. Corriere
- University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI
- University of Michigan, Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Andrew M. Ibrahim
- University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI
- University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI
- University of Michigan, Taubman College of Architecture & Urban Planning, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bass GA, Kaplan LJ, Gaarder C, Coimbra R, Klingensmith NJ, Kurihara H, Zago M, Cioffi SPB, Mohseni S, Sugrue M, Tolonen M, Valcarcel CR, Tilsed J, Hildebrand F, Marzi I. European society for trauma and emergency surgery member-identified research priorities in emergency surgery: a roadmap for future clinical research opportunities. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024; 50:367-382. [PMID: 38411700 PMCID: PMC11035411 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02441-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) is the European community of clinicians providing care to the injured and critically ill surgical patient. ESTES has several interlinked missions - (1) the promotion of optimal emergency surgical care through networked advocacy, (2) promulgation of relevant clinical cognitive and technical skills, and (3) the advancement of scientific inquiry that closes knowledge gaps, iteratively improves upon surgical and perioperative practice, and guides decision-making rooted in scientific evidence. Faced with multitudinous opportunities for clinical research, ESTES undertook an exercise to determine member priorities for surgical research in the short-to-medium term; these research priorities were presented to a panel of experts to inform a 'road map' narrative review which anchored these research priorities in the contemporary surgical literature. METHODS Individual ESTES members in active emergency surgery practice were polled as a representative sample of end-users and were asked to rank potential areas of future research according to their personal perceptions of priority. Using the modified eDelphi method, an invited panel of ESTES-associated experts in academic emergency surgery then crafted a narrative review highlighting potential research priorities for the Society. RESULTS Seventy-two responding ESTES members from 23 countries provided feedback to guide the modified eDelphi expert consensus narrative review. Experts then crafted evidence-based mini-reviews highlighting knowledge gaps and areas of interest for future clinical research in emergency surgery: timing of surgery, inter-hospital transfer, diagnostic imaging in emergency surgery, the role of minimally-invasive surgical techniques and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, patient-reported outcome measures, risk-stratification methods, disparities in access to care, geriatric outcomes, data registry and snapshot audit evaluations, emerging technologies interrogation, and the delivery and benchmarking of emergency surgical training. CONCLUSIONS This manuscript presents the priorities for future clinical research in academic emergency surgery as determined by a sample of the membership of ESTES. While the precise basis for prioritization was not evident, it may be anchored in disease prevalence, controversy around aspects of current patient care, or indeed the identification of a knowledge gap. These expert-crafted evidence-based mini-reviews provide useful insights that may guide the direction of future academic emergency surgery research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Alan Bass
- Division of Traumatology, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1, Suite 120, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation (CPORT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Lewis Jay Kaplan
- Division of Traumatology, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1, Suite 120, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Surgical Critical Care, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Christine Gaarder
- Department of Traumatology at Oslo University Hospital Ullevål (OUH U), Olso, Norway
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA
- Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA
- Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center - CECORC, Moreno Valley, CA, USA
| | - Nathan John Klingensmith
- Division of Traumatology, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1, Suite 120, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Hayato Kurihara
- State University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Ospedale Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Zago
- General & Emergency Surgery Division, A. Manzoni Hospital, ASST, Lecco, Lombardy, Italy
| | | | - Shahin Mohseni
- Department of Surgery, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Orebro University Hospital, 701 85, Orebro, Sweden
- Faculty of School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 702 81, Orebro, Sweden
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Letterkenny Hospital and Galway University, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | - Matti Tolonen
- Emergency Surgery, Meilahti Tower Hospital, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, PO Box 340, 00029, Helsinki, HUS, Finland
| | | | - Jonathan Tilsed
- Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Hu3 2Jz, Hull, England, UK
| | - Frank Hildebrand
- Department of Orthopaedics Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ingo Marzi
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schmidt S, Jacobs MA, Kim J, Hall DE, Stitzenberg KB, Kao LS, Brimhall BB, Wang CP, Manuel LS, Su HD, Silverstein JC, Shireman PK. Presentation Acuity and Surgical Outcomes for Patients With Health Insurance Living in Highly Deprived Neighborhoods. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:411-419. [PMID: 38324306 PMCID: PMC10851138 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.7468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Importance Insurance coverage expansion has been proposed as a solution to improving health disparities, but insurance expansion alone may be insufficient to alleviate care access barriers. Objective To assess the association of Area Deprivation Index (ADI) with postsurgical textbook outcomes (TO) and presentation acuity for individuals with private insurance or Medicare. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2013-2019) merged with electronic health record data from 3 academic health care systems. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to August 2023. Exposure Living in a neighborhood with an ADI greater than 85. Main Outcomes and Measures TO, defined as absence of unplanned reoperations, Clavien-Dindo grade 4 complications, mortality, emergency department visits/observation stays, and readmissions, and presentation acuity, defined as having preoperative acute serious conditions (PASC) and urgent or emergent cases. Results Among a cohort of 29 924 patients, the mean (SD) age was 60.6 (15.6) years; 16 424 (54.9%) were female, and 13 500 (45.1) were male. A total of 14 306 patients had private insurance and 15 618 had Medicare. Patients in highly deprived neighborhoods (5536 patients [18.5%]), with an ADI greater than 85, had lower/worse odds of TO in both the private insurance group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99; P = .04) and Medicare group (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-1.00; P = .04) and higher odds of PASC and urgent or emergent cases. The association of ADIs greater than 85 with TO lost significance after adjusting for PASC and urgent/emergent cases. Differences in the probability of TO between the lowest-risk (ADI ≤85, no PASC, and elective surgery) and highest-risk (ADI >85, PASC, and urgent/emergent surgery) scenarios stratified by frailty were highest for very frail patients (Risk Analysis Index ≥40) with differences of 40.2% and 43.1% for those with private insurance and Medicare, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that patients living in highly deprived neighborhoods had lower/worse odds of TO and higher presentation acuity despite having private insurance or Medicare. These findings suggest that insurance coverage expansion alone is insufficient to overcome health care disparities, possibly due to persistent barriers to preventive care and other complex causes of health inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Schmidt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio
| | - Michael A. Jacobs
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio
| | - Jeongsoo Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio
| | - Daniel E. Hall
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Lillian S. Kao
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
| | - Bradley B. Brimhall
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio
- University Health, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Chen-Pin Wang
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio
| | - Laura S. Manuel
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio
- UT Health Physicians Business Intelligence and Data Analytics, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio
| | - Hoah-Der Su
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jonathan C. Silverstein
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Paula K. Shireman
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio
- University Health, San Antonio, Texas
- Department of Primary Care and Rural Medicine, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Bryan
- Department of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Bryan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ng AP, Cho NY, Kim S, Ali K, Mallick S, Lee H, Benharash P. National analysis of racial disparities in emergent surgery for colorectal cancer. Surg Open Sci 2024; 18:35-41. [PMID: 38318320 PMCID: PMC10838942 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Racial disparities in access to preoperative evaluation for colorectal cancer remain unclear. Emergent admission may indicate lack of access to timely care. The present work aimed to evaluate the association of admission type with race among patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Methods All adults undergoing resection for colorectal cancer in 2011-2020 National Inpatient Sample were identified. Multivariable regression models were developed to examine the association of admission type with race. Primary outcome was major adverse events (MAE), including mortality and complications. Secondary outcomes included costs and length of stay (LOS). Interaction terms between year, admission type, and race were used to analyze trends. Results Of 722,736 patients, 67.6 % had Elective and 32.4 % Emergent admission. Black (AOR 1.38 [95 % CI 1.33-1.44]), Hispanic (1.45 [1.38-1.53]), and Asian/Pacific Islander or Native American (1.25 [1.18-1.32]) race were associated with significantly increased odds of Emergent operation relative to White. Over the study period, non-White patients consistently comprised over 5 % greater proportion of the Emergent cohort compared to Elective. Furthermore, Emergent admission was associated with 3-fold increase in mortality and complications, 5-day increment in LOS, and $10,100 increase in costs. MAE rates among Emergent patients remained greater than Elective with a widening gap over time. Non-White patients experienced significantly increased MAE regardless of admission type. Conclusion Non-White race was associated with increased odds of emergent colorectal cancer resection. Given the persistent disparity over the past decade, systematic approaches to alleviate racial inequities in colorectal cancer screening and improve access to timely surgical treatment are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha P. Ng
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nam Yong Cho
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shineui Kim
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Konmal Ali
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Saad Mallick
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bicket MC, Ladha KS, Boehnke KF, Lai Y, Gunaseelan V, Waljee JF, Englesbe M, Brummett CM. The Association of Cannabis Use After Discharge From Surgery With Opioid Consumption and Patient-reported Outcomes. Ann Surg 2024; 279:437-442. [PMID: 37638417 PMCID: PMC10840622 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes of patients using versus not using cannabis as a treatment for pain after discharge from surgery. BACKGROUND Cannabis is increasingly available and is often taken by patients to relieve pain. However, it is unclear whether cannabis use for pain after surgery impacts opioid consumption and postoperative outcomes. METHODS Using Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry data at 69 hospitals, we analyzed a cohort of patients undergoing 16 procedure types between January 1, 2021, and October 31, 2021. The key exposure was cannabis use for pain after surgery. Outcomes included postdischarge opioid consumption (primary) and patient-reported outcomes of pain, satisfaction, quality of life, and regret to undergo surgery (secondary). RESULTS Of 11,314 included patients (58% females, mean age: 55.1 years), 581 (5.1%) reported using cannabis to treat pain after surgery. In adjusted models, patients who used cannabis consumed an additional 1.0 (95% CI: 0.4-1.5) opioid pills after surgery. Patients who used cannabis were more likely to report moderate-to-severe surgical site pain at 1 week (adjusted odds ratio: 1.7, 95% CIL 1.4-2.1) and 1 month (adjusted odds ratio: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.7-2.7) after surgery. Patients who used cannabis were less likely to endorse high satisfaction (72.1% vs 82.6%), best quality of life (46.7% vs 63.0%), and no regret (87.6% vs 92.7%) (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patient-reported cannabis use, to treat postoperative pain, was associated with increased opioid consumption after discharge from surgery that was of clinically insignificant amounts, but worse pain and other postoperative patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark C Bicket
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Karim S Ladha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kevin F Boehnke
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Yenling Lai
- Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Vidhya Gunaseelan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jennifer F Waljee
- Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Michael Englesbe
- Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Chad M Brummett
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|