Adjuvant Therapy After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?

The patterns and risk factors for relapse in oesophageal squamous cell cancers that achieve pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to investigate the patterns and risk factors for recurrence in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma with a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2018, a total of 96 patients with pCR were enrolled in this study. Lymph nodes with a pCR [LN-ypCR response (+)] were defined as those lymph nodes without residual tumour but with the presence of treatment response to nCRT. Prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analysed with Cox proportional hazards models and Fine-Gray competing risk models. Lymph node (LN) stations were counted according to the Japan Esophageal Society classification.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 51.5 months. Recurrence occurred in 15 cases (15.6%) with a 9.9-month median time to recurrence and a 15.6-month median survival after recurrence. The majority of recurrent diseases developed within the first 2 years postoperatively. Distant recurrences were detected in 14 cases (14.6%), in which the most common recurrence sites were no.104 LN and the lung, followed by no.16 LN. The mean RFS in the whole cohort was 116.6 months. The LN-ypCR response (+) was identified as the independent prognostic factor for worse RFS in both the multivariate Cox model and the Fine-Gray competing risk model (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Relapse is not rare in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cases with pCR after nCRT. Distant recurrences, the predominant pattern of relapse, occur primarily within the first 2 years after oesophagectomy. Patients with pCR with an LN-ypCR response (+) have a higher risk for postoperative recurrence.

Survival benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with residual pathologic disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or chemoradiation is the current standard of care for esophageal cancer in China, the impact of subsequent adjuvant therapy on patient prognosis remains unknown. This study aims to analyze the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on the survival rates of patients who have achieved a non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) after NACT and subsequent surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed the data of 2193 patients with locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent radical surgery between January 2006 and January 2016. Of these patients, 46 received NACT and ACT, while 109 received NACT only. Propensity score matching was used to compare 86 patients, with 43 patients in the NACT + ACT group and 43 patients in the NACT group. Univariate analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, while Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that pathological lymph node status (positive vs negative) (P < .001) and treatment modalities (NACT + ACT vs NACT) (P = .005) were independent prognostic factors. There was a significant difference in long-term survival rates between the NACT + ACT and NACT groups, with 5-year survival rates of 55.8% vs 39.5%, respectively (χ2 = 4.270, P = .039). In patients with ypN+ status, the 5-year survival rate was 31.8% for those who received ACT after NACT and surgery, compared to 10.0% for those who did not receive additional ACT (χ2 = 6.101, P = .014). The corresponding percentages in patients with ypN- were 81.0% and 65.2%, respectively (χ2 = 1.993, P = .158).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy should be recommended for locally advanced ESCC patients with residual cancer after NACT and surgery, especially for patients with nodal metastases after NACT.

Recurrence timing and patterns incorporating lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose

About 40% of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients experienced recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) plus esophagectomy. While limited information was available on recurrence risk stratification in ESCC after neoadjuvant treatment. Our previous study showed ypN status was a reliable tool to differentiate and predict the prognosis in the recurrent population. Here, we evaluated recurrence timing and patterns in ESCC patients, taking into consideration lymph node status after nCRT.

Materials and methods

A total of 309 ESCC patients treated with nCRT plus esophagectomy between 2018 and 2021 were enrolled in this observational cohort study. Lymph node status was recorded by the pathologist according to the surgical specimens. We retrospectively investigated the timing and patterns of recurrence and the prognoses in ESCC patients, taking into consideration lymph node status after nCRT.

Results

After nCRT plus surgery in ESCC patients, lymph node metastasis was associated with unfavorable clinicopathological factors and high risks of recurrence. In the recurrent subgroup, ypN+ patients experienced earlier recurrence, especially for locoregional recurrence within the first year. Moreover, ypN+ patients had poorer prognosis. However, the recurrence patterns in the ypN- and ypN+ groups were similar. Besides, there were no significant differences in surgery to recurrence, recurrence to death, or overall survival among patients with locoregional or distant recurrence for overall patients and within ypN- or ypN+ groups.

Conclusions

Lymph node metastasis was correlated with unfavorable clinicopathological factors and high risks of recurrence. Despite a similar recurrence pattern in the recurrent subgroup between the ypN- and ypN+ groups, ypN+ patients exhibited earlier recurrence and a worse prognosis.

Optimal policy tree to assist in adjuvant therapy decision-making after resection of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Although systemic postoperative therapy after surgery for colorectal liver metastases is generally recommended, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has been debated. We used machine learning to develop a decision tree and define which patients may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2000 and 2020 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. An optimal policy tree analysis was used to determine the optimal assignment of the adjuvant chemotherapy to subgroups of patients for overall survival and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

Among 1,358 patients who underwent curative-intent resection of colorectal liver metastases, 1,032 (76.0%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 28.7 months (interquartile range 13.7-52.0), 5-year overall survival was 67.5%, and 3-year recurrence-free survival was 52.6%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better recurrence-free survival (3-year recurrence-free survival: adjuvant chemotherapy, 54.4% vs no adjuvant chemotherapy, 46.8%; P < .001) but no overall survival significant improvement (5-year overall survival: adjuvant chemotherapy, 68.1% vs no adjuvant chemotherapy, 65.7%; P = .15). Patients were randomly allocated into 2 cohorts (training data set, n = 679, testing data set, n = 679). The random forest model demonstrated good performance in predicting counterfactual probabilities of death and recurrence relative to receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. According to the optimal policy tree, patient demographics, secondary tumor characteristics, and primary tumor characteristics defined the subpopulation that would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

A novel artificial intelligence methodology based on patient, primary tumor, and treatment characteristics may help clinicians tailor adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations after colorectal liver metastases resection.

Postoperative morbidity after simultaneous versus staged resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases: Impact of hepatic tumor burden

BACKGROUND

We sought to characterize the risk of postoperative complications relative to the surgical approach and overall synchronous colorectal liver metastases tumor burden score.

METHODS

Patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases who underwent curative-intent resection between 2000 and 2020 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Propensity score matching was employed to control for heterogeneity between the 2 groups. A virtual twins analysis was performed to identify potential subgroups of patients who might benefit more from staged versus simultaneous resection.

RESULTS

Among 976 patients who underwent liver resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases, 589 patients (60.3%) had a staged approach, whereas 387 (39.7%) patients underwent simultaneous resection of the primary tumor and synchronous colorectal liver metastases. After propensity score matching, 295 patients who underwent each surgical approach were analyzed. Overall, the incidence of postoperative complications was 34.1% (n = 201). Among patients with high tumor burden scores, the surgical approach was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications; in contrast, among patients with low or medium tumor burden scores, the likelihood of complications did not differ based on the surgical approach. Virtual twins analysis demonstrated that preoperative tumor burden score was important to identify which subgroup of patients benefited most from staged versus simultaneous resection. Simultaneous resection was associated with better outcomes among patients with a tumor burden score <9 and a node-negative right-sided primary tumor; in contrast, staged resection was associated with better outcomes among patients with node-positive left-sided primary tumors and higher tumor burden score.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with high tumor burden scores, simultaneous resection of the primary tumor and liver metastases was associated with an increased incidence of postoperative complications.

Age-dependent benefit of neoadjuvant treatment in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: a multicenter retrospective observational study of young versus old patients

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to provide evidence for age-dependent use of neoadjuvant treatment by clinical comparisons of young (lower quartile, <56.6 years) versus old (upper quartile, >71.3 years) patients with esophageal and esophagogastric-junction adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant treatment is the standard of care for locally advanced and node-positive EAC. However, the effect of age on oncological outcomes is disputable as they are underrepresented in treatment defining randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

Patients with EAC undergoing esophagectomy between 2001 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed from three centers. Patients having distant metastases or clinical UICC-stage I were excluded. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify the variables associated with survival benefit.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant treatment was administered to 185/248 (74.2%) young and 151 out of 248 (60.9%) elderly patients ( P =0.001). Young age was associated with a significant overall survival (OS) benefit (median OS: 85.6 vs. 29.9 months, hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42-0.92) after neoadjuvant treatment versus surgery alone. In contrast, elderly patients did only experience a survival benefit equaling the length of neoadjuvant treatment itself (median OS: neoadjuvant 32.8 vs. surgery alone 29.3 months, hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI: 0.63-1.27). Despite the clear difference in median OS benefit, histopathological regression was similar ((Mandard-TRG-1/2: young 30.7 vs. old 36.4%, P= 0.286). More elderly patients had a dose reduction or termination of neoadjuvant treatment (12.4 vs. 40.4%, P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Old patients benefit less from neoadjuvant treatment compared to younger patients in terms of gain in OS. Since they also experience more side effects requiring dose reduction, upfront surgery should be considered as the primary treatment option in elderly patients.