Hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors with a "thin slice" pathological examination: they are many more than you think

Factors Predicting Prognosis in Metastatic Grade 1 Gastro-entero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) has steadily increased. These tumors are considered relatively indolent even when metastatic. What determines survival outcomes in such situations is understudied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained NET clinic database, to include patients of metastatic grade 1 GEP-NET, from January 2018 to December 2021, to assess factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Of the 589 patients of GEP-NET treated during the study period, 100 were grade 1, with radiological evidence of distant metastasis. The median age was 50 years, with 67% being men. Of these, 15 patients were observed, while 85 patients received treatment in the form of surgery (n = 32), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (n = 50), octreotide LAR (n = 22), and/or chemotherapy (n = 4), either as a single modality or multi-modality treatment. The median (PFS) was 54.5 months. The estimated 3-year PFS and 3-year overall survival rates were 72.3% (SE 0.048) and 93.4% (SE 0.026), respectively. On Cox regression, a high liver tumor burden was the only independent predictor of PFS (OR 3.443, p = 0.014). The 5-year OS of patients with concomitant extra-hepatic disease was significantly lower than that of patients with liver-limited disease (70.7% vs. 100%, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

A higher burden of liver disease is associated with shorter PFS in patients with metastatic grade I GEP-NETs. The OS is significantly lower in patients with associated extrahepatic involvement. These parameters may justify a more aggressive treatment approach in metastatic grade 1 GEP-NETs.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2024 guidance paper for the management of well-differentiated small intestine neuroendocrine tumours

Both the incidence and prevalence of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours from the small intestine (Si-NET) are gradually increasing. Most patients have non-functioning tumours with subtle GI symptoms and tumours are often discovered incidentally by endoscopy or at advanced disease stages by imaging depicting mesenteric lymph node and /or liver metastases while around 30% of the patients present with symptoms of the carcinoid syndrome. Adequate biochemical assessment and staging including functional imaging is crucial for treatment-related decision-making that should take place in an expert multidisciplinary team setting. Preferably, patients should be referred to specialised ENETS Centres of Excellence or centres of high expertise in the field. This guidance paper provides the current evidence and best knowledge for the management of Si-NET grade (G) 1-3 following 10 key questions of practical relevance for the diagnostic and therapeutic decision making.

Liver transplantation as an alternative for the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastasis: Appraisal of the current evidence

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is still in debate. Studies comparing LT with liver resection (LR) for NELM are scarce, as patient selection is heterogeneous and experience is limited. The goal of this review was to provide a critical analysis of the evidence on LT versus LR in the treatment of NELM.

DATA SOURCES

A scoping literature search on LT and LR for NELM was performed with PubMed, including English articles up to March 2023.

RESULTS

International guidelines recommend LR for NELM in resectable, well-differentiated tumors in the absence of extrahepatic metastatic disease with superior results of LR compared to systemic or liver-directed therapies. Advanced liver surgery has extended resectability criteria whilst entailing increased perioperative risk and short disease-free survival. In highly selected patients (based on the Milan criteria) with unresectable NELM, oncologic results of LT are promising. Prognostic factors include tumor biology (G1/G2) and burden, waiting time for LT, patient age and extrahepatic spread. Based on low-level evidence, LT for low-grade NELM within the Milan criteria resulted in improved disease-free survival and overall survival compared to LR. The benefits of LT were lost in patients beyond the Milan NELM-criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

With adherence to strict selection criteria especially tumor biology, LT for NELM is becoming a valuable option providing oncologic benefits compared to LR. Recent evidence suggests even stricter selection criteria with regard to tumor biology.

ASO Practice Guidelines Series: Surgical Management of Gastrointestinal (Midgut) Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal midgut neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of uncommon malignancies. For well-differentiated NENs, known as neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), surgery is a cornerstone of management in localized and metastatic disease. Because of heterogeneous tumor behaviour, association with endocrine syndrome, and prognosis, the management of NETs must be individualized to all these factors in addition to the primary site. With the fast pace of advancement in the field, both for therapies and understanding of tumoral etiology and behaviour, it is important for surgical oncologists to remain updated on guidelines recommendations and suggested treatment pathways. Those guidelines provide important guidance for management of NETs but are largely based on expert opinions and interpretation of retrospective evidence. This article reviews highlights of most recent practice guidelines for midgut (gastric, duodenal, small intestinal, and appendiceal) NETs.

Surgery as a Principle and Technical Consideration for Primary Tumor Resection of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NETs) are increasingly identified and have become the most frequent entity among small bowel tumors. An increasing incidence, a high prevalence, and a prolonged survival with optimal modern multidisciplinary management makes SB-NETs a unique set of tumors to consider for surgical oncologists. The major goals of surgical treatment in the setting of SB-NET include control of tumor volume, control of endocrine secretion, and prevention of locoregional complications. Key considerations include assessment of multifocality and resection of mesenteric nodal masses with the use of mesenteric-sparing approaches and acceptance of R1 margins if necessary to clear disease while avoiding short bowel syndrome. A description through eight steps for consideration is presented to allow for systematic surgical planning and execution of resection. Moreover, some controversies and evolving considerations to the surgical principles and technical procedures remain. The role of primary tumor resection in the presence of (unresectable) liver metastasis is still unclear. Reports of feasibility of minimally invasive surgery are emerging, with undetermined selection criteria for appropriateness or long-term outcomes. Resection of SB-NETs should be considered in all patients fit for surgery and should follow principles to achieve surgical oncological control that is appropriate for the stage and tumor burden, considering the age and comorbidity of the individual patient.

The Role of Liver Transplantation in the Treatment of Liver Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Transplant oncology is a new field of medicine referred to the use of solid organ transplantation, particularly the liver, to improve prognosis and quality of life in cancer patients. In unresectable, liver-only metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the digestive tract, liver transplantation represents a competitive chance of cure. Due to the limited resource of donated organs, accurate patients' selection is crucial in order to maximize transplant benefit. Several tumor- and patient-related factors should be considered. Among them, primary tumors with a low grade of differentiation (G1-G2 or Ki67 < 10%), located in a region drained by the portal system and removed before transplantation with at least 3-6 months period of disease stability observed before transplant listing, can be considered for transplantation. In case of NET located in the pancreas, extended lymphadenectomy should complement curative pancreatic resection. A number of other features are described in this review of liver transplantation for NET metastases. Comprehensive approach including various forms of non-surgical treatment and detailed planning and timing of total hepatectomy are discussed. Open issues remain on possible expansion of current criteria while maintaining the same long-term benefit demonstrated with the Milan NET criteria with respect to other non-transplant options, with particular reference to liver resection, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and locoregional and systemic treatments.

Defining MRI Superiority over CT for Colorectal and Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

We compared CT and MRI for staging metastatic colorectal or neuroendocrine liver metastases (CRLMs and NELMs, respectively) to assess their impact on tumor burden.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was queried for patients who underwent both imaging modalities within 3 months, with two blinded radiologists (R1 and R2) independently assessing the images for liver lesions. To minimize recall bias, studies were grouped by modality, and were randomized and evaluated separately.

RESULTS

Our query yielded 76 patients (42 CRLMs; 34 NELMs) with low interrater variability (intraclass correlation coefficients: CT = 0.941, MRI = 0.975). For CRLMs, there were no significant differences in lesion number or size between CT and MRI. However, in NELMs, Eovist®-enhanced MRI detected more lesions (R1: 14.3 vs. 12.1, p = 0.02; R2: 14.4 vs. 12.4, p = 0.01) and smaller lesions (R1: 5.7 vs. 4.4, p = 0.03; R2: 4.8 vs. 2.9, p = 0.02) than CT.

CONCLUSIONS

CT and MRI are equivalent for CRLMs, but for NELMs, MRI outperforms CT in detecting more and smaller lesions, potentially influencing treatment planning and surgery.

Long-Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for the Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review

Liver transplantation is an uncommonly used, controversially debated therapeutic approach for highly selected individuals with neuroendocrine liver metastases. Synthesising evidence regarding outcomes from this approach is crucial to understand its position within the broad neuroendocrine liver metastases armamentarium. In this narrative systematic review of studies published in PubMed, Scopus and OVID until 1 July 2021, we summarise and critically appraise the existing literature regarding this modality, with a special focus on long-term outcomes data where possible. Fourteen studies were identified that reported outcomes from the use of liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. No randomised trials were identified. Generally, indications and selection criteria were poorly articulated, with the notable exception of studies using the Milan criteria. The median 5-year overall survival was 65% (ranging from 36% to 97.2%, 11 studies), and the median 10-year overall survival was 50% (ranging from 46.1% to 88.8%, 3 studies). One additional study focussed on treatments and outcomes following post-transplant recurrence. No studies reported outcomes past 10 years. Further follow-up of the largest series with explicit selection criteria will deepen our understanding of the role that transplantation has to play in this setting.

A Comprehensive Review on Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Presentation, Pathophysiology and Management

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of heterogeneous tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation that can arise from any organ. They account for 2% of all malignancies in the United States. A significant proportion of NEN patients experience endocrine imbalances consequent to increased amine or peptide hormone secretion, impacting their quality of life and prognosis. Over the last decade, pathologic categorization, diagnostic techniques and therapeutic choices for NENs-both well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs)-have appreciably evolved. Diagnosis of NEN mostly follows a suspicion from clinical features or incidental imaging findings. Hormonal or non-hormonal biomarkers (like serum serotonin, urine 5-HIAA, gastrin and VIP) and histology of a suspected NEN is, therefore, critical for both confirmation of the diagnosis and classification as an NET or NEC. Therapy for NENs has progressed recently based on a better molecular understanding, including the involvement of mTOR, VEGF and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), which add to the growing evidence supporting the possibility of treatment beyond complete resection. As the incidence of NENs is on the rise in the United States and several other countries, physicians are more likely to see these cases, and their better understanding may support earlier diagnosis and tailoring treatment to the patient. We have compiled clinically significant evidence for NENs, including relevant changes to clinical practice that have greatly updated our diagnostic and therapeutic approach for NEN patients.

Histopathological Evaluation and Molecular Diagnostic Tests for Peritoneal Metastases with Unknown Primary Site-a Review

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a well-studied entity with guidelines available for the management of patients with CUP. The peritoneum represents one of the metastatic sites in CUP, and peritoneal metastases (PM) could present as CUP. PM of unknown origin remains a poorly studied clinical entity. There is only one series of 15 cases, one population-based study, and few other case reports on this subject. Studies on CUP, in general, cover some common tumour histological types like adenocarcinomas and squamous carcinomas. Some of these tumours may have a good prognosis though majority have high-grade disease with a poor long-term outcome. Some of the histological tumour types commonly seen in the clinical scenario of PM like mucinous carcinoma have not been studied. In this review, we divide PM into five histological types-adenocarcinomas, serous carcinomas, mucinous carcinomas, sarcomas and other rare varieties. We provide algorithms to identify the primary tumour site using immunohistochemistry when imaging, and endoscopy fails to establish the primary tumour site. The role of molecular diagnostic tests for PM or unknown origin is also discussed. Current literature on site-specific systemic therapy based on gene expression profiling does not show a clear benefit of this approach over empirical systemic therapies.

Controversy Over Liver Transplantation or Resection for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: Tumor Biology Cuts the Deal

BACKGROUND

In patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM), liver transplantation (LT) is an alternative to liver resection (LR), although the choice of therapy remains controversial. In this multicenter study, we aim to provide novel insight in this dispute.

METHODS

Following a systematic literature search, 15 large international centers were contacted to provide comprehensive data on their patients after LR or LT for NELM. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, while multivariable Cox regression served to identify factors influencing survival after either transplantation or resection. Inverse probability weighting and propensity score matching was used for analyses with balanced and equalized baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 455 patients were analyzed, including 230 after LR and 225 after LT, with a median follow-up of 97 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 85-110 months]. Multivariable analysis revealed G3 grading as a negative prognostic factor for LR [hazard ratio (HR)=2.22, 95% CI: 1.04-4.77, P =0.040], while G2 grading (HR=2.52, 95% CI: 1.15-5.52, P =0.021) and LT outside Milan criteria (HR=2.40, 95% CI: 1.16-4.92, P =0.018) were negative prognostic factors in transplanted patients. Inverse probability-weighted multivariate analyses revealed a distinct survival benefit after LT. Matched patients presented a median overall survival (OS) of 197 months (95% CI: 143-not reached) and a 73% 5-year OS after LT, and 119 months (95% CI: 74-133 months) and a 52.8% 5-year OS after LR (HR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9, P =0.022). However, the survival benefit after LT was lost if patients were transplanted outside Milan criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicentric study in patients with NELM demonstrates a survival benefit of LT over LR. This benefit depends on adherence to selection criteria, in particular low-grade tumor biology and Milan criteria, and must be balanced against potential risks of LT.

Defining a New Classification System for the Surgical Management of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases

Although rarely curative, hepatic cytoreduction of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM) is associated with improved symptom control and prolonged survival. Preoperative 68Ga DOTATATE and gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI can improve characterization of hepatic disease extent to improve surgical clearance, and resection of the primary tumor is associated with improved survival regardless of whether the liver metastases are treated. As parenchymal-sparing surgical techniques and the lowering of the debulking threshold have expanded the numbers of eligible NETLM patients for hepatic cytoreduction, we propose a new classification system to help guide surgical management. A multimodal approach that includes surgery, liver-directed therapies, and systemic therapies has improved outcomes and increased longevity for patients with well-differentiated metastatic NET.

Neuroendocrine hepatic metastatic disease: the surgeon's perspective

Neuroendocrine tumors are a rare subset of tumors that are increasing in incidence over the last 4 decades. These tumors occur along the gastrointestinal tract and bronchopulmonary tree and frequently metastasize. Up to 90% of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors develop liver metastases (NeLM) during their clinical course. The development of NeLM and their appropriate management has a profound impact on patient morbidity and mortality. Workup of NeLM involves biopsy to define tumor grade, cross-sectional imaging to delineate the distribution and number of metastases, and hormonal studies to determine tumor functionality. Depending on these three factors, a combination of cytoreductive surgery, liver-directed therapies, and medical management-with cytostatic and cytotoxic chemotherapies, is utilized. The multidisciplinary management of patients with NeLM should carefully consider all these factors.

Safety and Outcomes of Combined Pancreatic and Hepatic Resections for Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40-50% of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) initially present with distant metastases. Little is known about the outcomes of patients undergoing combined pancreatic and hepatic resections for this indication.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic pNETs at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2000 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Major pancreatectomy was defined as pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy, and major hepatectomy as right hepatectomy or trisegmentectomy. Characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent pancreatectomy with simultaneous hepatectomy were compared with those of patients who underwent isolated hepatectomy (with or without prior history of pancreatectomy).

RESULTS

205 patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic pNETs were identified: 131 underwent pancreatectomy with simultaneous hepatectomy and 74 underwent isolated hepatectomy. Among patients undergoing simultaneous hepatectomy, 89 patients underwent minor pancreatectomy with minor hepatectomy, 11 patients underwent major pancreatectomy with minor hepatectomy, 30 patients underwent minor pancreatectomy with major hepatectomy, and 1 patient underwent major pancreatectomy with major hepatectomy. Patients undergoing simultaneous hepatectomy had more numerous liver lesions (10 or more lesions in 54% vs. 34%, p = 0.008), but the groups were otherwise similar. Rates of any major complications (31% versus 24%, p = 0.43), hepatectomy-specific complications such as bile leak, hemorrhage, and liver failure (0.8-7.6% vs. 1.4-12%, p = 0.30-0.99), and 90-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.62) were similar between the two groups. 5-year overall survival was 64% after combined resections and 65% after isolated hepatectomy (p = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

For patients with metastatic pNETs, combined pancreatic and hepatic resections can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality in selected patients at high-volume institutions.

Current status of surgical management of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the gastroenteropancreatic system are rare and heterogeneous tumours, yet with increasing prevalence. The most frequent primary sites are the small intestine, rectum, pancreas, and stomach. For a localized disease, surgical resection with local lymph nodes is usually curative with good overall and disease free survival. More complex situation is the treatment of locally advanced lesions, liver metastases, and, surprisingly, small asymptomatic tumours of the rectum and pancreas. In this review, we focus on the current role of surgical management of gastroenteropancreatic NENs. We present surgical approach for the most frequent primary sites. We highlight the role of endoscopic surgery and the watch-and-wait strategy for selected cases. As liver metastases pose an important clinical challenge, we present current indications and contraindications for liver resection and a role of liver transplantation for metastatic NENs.

Orchestrating Treatment Modalities in Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors-Need for a Conductor

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are a vast growing disease. Over 50% of these tumors are recognized at advanced stages with lymph node, liver, or distant metastasis. An ongoing controversy is the role of surgery in the metastatic setting as dedicated systemic treatments have emerged recently and shown benefits in randomized trials. Today, liver surgery is an option for advanced pNETs if the tumor has a favorable prognosis, reflected by a low to moderate proliferation index (G1 and G2). Surgery in this well-selected population may prolong progression-free and overall survival. Optimal selection of a treatment plan for an individual patient should be considered in a multidisciplinary tumor board. However, while current guidelines offer a variety of modalities, there is so far only a limited focus on the right timing. Available data is based on small case series or retrospective analyses. The focus of this review is to highlight the right time-point for surgery in the setting of the multimodal treatment of an advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Multimodal Management of Grade 1 and 2 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) are rare tumors with a recent growing incidence. In the 2017 WHO classification, p-NETs are classified into well-differentiated (i.e., p-NETs grade 1 to 3) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (i.e., p-NECs). P-NETs G1 and G2 are often non-functioning tumors, of which the prognosis depends on the metastatic status. In the localized setting, p-NETs should be surgically managed, as no benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated. Parenchymal sparing resection, including both duodenum and pancreas, are safe procedures in selected patients with reduced endocrine and exocrine long-term dysfunction. When the p-NET is benign or borderline malignant, this surgical option is associated with low rates of severe postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality. This narrative review offers comments, tips, and tricks from reviewing the available literature on these different options in order to clarify their indications. We also sum up the overall current data on p-NETs G1 and G2 management.

Is Long-Term Survival in Metastases from Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Improved by Liver Resection?

Background and Objectives: Although many of the neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) have a typically prolonged natural history compared with other gastrointestinal tract cancers, at least 40% of patients develop liver metastases. This study aims to identify whether liver resection improves the overall survival of patients with liver metastases from NEN. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at “Fundeni” Clinical Institute over a time period of 15 years; we thereby identified a series of 93 patients treated for NEN with liver metastases, which we further divided into 2 groups as follows: A (45 patients) had been subjected to liver resection complemented by systemic therapies, and B (48 patients) underwent systemic therapy alone. To reduce the patient selection bias we performed at first a propensity score matching. This was followed by a bootstrapping selection with Jackknife error correction, with the purpose of getting a statistically illustrative sample. Results: The overall survival of the matched virtual cohort under study was 41 months (95% CI 37–45). Group A virtual matched patients showed a higher survival rate (52 mo., 95% CI: 45–59) than B (31 mo., 95% CI: 27–35), (p < 0.001, Log-Rank test). Upon multivariate analysis, seven independent factors were identified to have an influence on survival: location (midgut) and primary tumor grading (G3), absence of concomitant LM, number (2–4), location (unilobar), grading (G3) of LM, and 25–50% hepatic involvement at the time of the metastatic disease diagnosis. Conclusions: Hepatic resection is nowadays the main treatment providing potential cure and prolonged survival, for patients with NEN when integrated in a multimodal strategy based on systemic therapy.

Liver-Directed Therapy for Neuroendocrine Metastases: From Interventional Radiology to Nuclear Medicine Procedures

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous epithelial tumors most commonly arising from the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system. GEP-NENs account for approximately 60% of all NENs, and the small intestine and pancreas represent two most common sites of primary tumor development. Approximately 80% of metastatic patients have secondary liver lesions, and in approximately 50% of patients, the liver is the only metastatic site. The therapeutic strategy depends on the degree of hepatic metastatic invasion, ranging from liver surgery or percutaneous ablation to palliative treatments to reduce both tumor volume and secretion. In patients with grade 1 and 2 NENs, locoregional nonsurgical treatments of liver metastases mainly include percutaneous ablation and endovascular treatments, targeting few or multiple hepatic metastases, respectively. In the present work, we provide a narrative review of the current knowledge on liver-directed therapy for metastasis treatment, including both interventional radiology procedures and nuclear medicine options in NEN patients, taking into account the patient clinical context and both the strengths and limitations of each modality.

Updated Principles of Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (pNETs): What Every Surgeon Needs to Know

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) represent 1 to 2% of all pancreatic neoplasm with an increasing incidence. They have a varied clinical, biological and radiological presentation, depending on whether they are sporadic or genetic in origin, whether they are functional or non-functional, and whether there is a single or multiple lesions. These pNETs are often diagnosed at an advanced stage with locoregional lymph nodes invasion or distant metastases. In most cases, the gold standard curative treatment is surgical resection of the pancreatic tumour, but the postoperative complications and functional consequences are not negligible. Thus, these patients should be managed in specialised high-volume centres with multidisciplinary discussion involving surgeons, oncologists, radiologists and pathologists. Innovative managements such as "watch and wait" strategies, parenchymal sparing surgery and minimally invasive approach are emerging. The correct use of all these therapeutic options requires a good selection of patients but also a constant update of knowledge. The aim of this work is to update the surgical management of pNETs and to highlight key elements in view of the recent literature.

Are recist criteria adequate in assessing the response to therapy in metastatic NEN?

Response to therapy criteria, known as RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours), are widely used to evaluate neuroendocrine tumours (NET) metastatic to the liver, under treatment. RECIST criteria does not take in account many various distinct features such as tumour growth, secretory capacity and anatomical localisation with wide variation in clinical and biological presentation of different NETs. Key features of RECIST includes definitions of the minimal size of measurable lesions, instructions on how many lesions to measure and follow, and the use of unidimensional, rather than bidimensional, measures for overall evaluation of tumour burden. These measures are currently done with computed tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). RECIST criteria are accurate in assessing tumour progression but sometimes inaccurate in assessing tumour response after locoregional therapy or under molecular targeted therapy, tumour vessels being part of the target of such treatments. There is poor correlation between a so called tumour necrosis and conventional methods of response assessment, which poses questions of how best to quantify efficacy of these targeted therapies. Variations in tumour density with computed tomography (CT) could theoretically be associated with tumour necrosis. This hypothesis has been studied proposing alternative CT criteria of response evaluation in metastatic digestive NET treated with targeted therapy. If preliminary results upon the poor relationship between density measured with CT (derived from CHOI criteria) evolution curves at CT and PFS are confirmed by further studies, showing that the correlation between density changing and response to non-targeted treatment is weak, the use of contrast injection, will probably be not mandatory to enable appropriate evaluation.

Target Heterogeneity in Oncology: The Best Predictor for Differential Response to Radioligand Therapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors and Prostate Cancer

Simple Summary

In the era of precision medicine, novel targets have emerged on the surface of cancer cells, which have been exploited for the purpose of radioligand therapy. However, there have been variations in the way these receptors are expressed, especially in prostate cancers and neuroendocrine tumors. This variable expression of receptors across the grades of cancers led to the concept of ‘target heterogeneity’, which has not just impacted therapeutic decisions but also their outcomes. Radiopharmaceuticals targeting receptors need to be used when there are specific indicators—either clinical, radiological, or at molecular level—warranting their use. In addition, response to these radioligands can be assessed using different techniques, whereby we can prognosticate further outcomes. We shall also discuss, in this review, the conventional as well as novel approaches of detecting heterogeneity in prostate cancers and neuroendocrine tumors.

Abstract

Tumor or target heterogeneity (TH) implies presence of variable cellular populations having different genomic characteristics within the same tumor, or in different tumor sites of the same patient. The challenge is to identify this heterogeneity, as it has emerged as the most common cause of ‘treatment resistance’, to current therapeutic agents. We have focused our discussion on ‘Prostate Cancer’ and ‘Neuroendocrine Tumors’, and looked at the established methods for demonstrating heterogeneity, each with its advantages and drawbacks. Also, the available theranostic radiotracers targeting PSMA and somatostatin receptors combined with targeted systemic agents, have been described. Lu-177 labeled PSMA and DOTATATE are the ‘standard of care’ radionuclide therapeutic tracers for management of progressive treatment-resistant prostate cancer and NET. These approved therapies have shown reasonable benefit in treatment outcome, with improvement in quality of life parameters. Various biomarkers and predictors of response to radionuclide therapies targeting TH which are currently available and those which can be explored have been elaborated in details. Imaging-based features using artificial intelligence (AI) need to be developed to further predict the presence of TH. Also, novel theranostic tools binding to newer targets on surface of cancer cell should be explored to overcome the treatment resistance to current treatment regimens.

Radiology of the neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract: a comprehensive review

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of neoplasms arising from the diffuse endocrine system (DES). The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is the most common site of NEN. The WHO classification divides NEN into three broad categories viz. well-differentiated NENs, poorly differentiated NENs, and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. All GIT NEN have the potential to synthesize and secrete various bioactive substances which may lead to various clinical syndromes. The NEN may occur anywhere in the GIT and exhibit varying clinical presentation, prognosis, and metastatic potential. Further, some tumors show association with familial syndromes like multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and neurofibromatosis type 1. Ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography-CT are the imaging modalities useful in the diagnosis, localization, and staging of GIT NEN. Management depends on the site, size, grade, and stage of the tumor with interventional radiology playing a significant role in some cases. This imaging review describes the role of a radiologist in the management of GIT NEN.

Outcomes of Simultaneous Resection of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors with Synchronous Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of synchronous resection of liver metastases (LM) from small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NET).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing resection for LMs from SB-NETs from January 1997 and December 2018 was performed.

RESULTS

There were 44 patients with synchronous SB-NET and LMs. Perioperative and 90-day mortality values were zero, and the morbidity rate was 27%. The median overall survival (OS) was 128.4 months (CI 95% 74.0-161.5 months) with 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 100%, 83%, 79%, and 60%, respectively. Not achieving surgical treatment for LM was the unique independent factor for survival (HR 6.50; CI 95% 1.54-27.28; p = 0.01) in patients with unresected LMs having OS and 10-year survival rates (42 months, 33%) versus patients undergoing liver resection (152 months, 66%)(p = 0.0008). The recurrence rate was 81.8% and associated with longer OS and 5-year survival rates when limited to the liver [223 months (61%) vs 94 months (87%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous resection of SB-NETs with synchronous LMs was safe and associated with considerable long-term survival even in the presence of bilobar disease. However, recurrence after resection was common (81%) but associated with longer survival rates when limited to the liver.

Currently available treatment options for neuroendocrine liver metastases

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are frequently characterized by a high propensity for metastasis to the liver, which appears to be a dominant site of distant-stage disease, affecting quality of life and overall survival. Liver surgery with the intention to cure is the treatment of choice for resectable neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM), aiming to potentially prolong survival and ameliorate hormonal symptoms refractory to medical control. Surgical resection is indicated for patients with NELM from well-differentiated NEN, while its feasibility and complexity are largely dictated by the degree of liver involvement. As a result of advances in surgical techniques over the past decades, complex 1- and 2-stage, or repeat liver resections are performed safely and effectively by experienced surgeons. Furthermore, liver transplantation for the treatment of NELM should be anchored in a multimodal and multidisciplinary therapeutic strategy and restricted only to highly selected individual cases. A broad spectrum of interventional radiology treatments for NELM have recently been available, with expanding indications that are more applicable, as they are less limited by patient- and tumor-related parameters, being therefore important adjuncts or alternatives to surgery. Overall, liver-targeted treatment modalities may precede the administration of systemic molecular targeted agents and chemotherapy for patients with liver-dominant metastatic disease; these appear to be a crucial component of multimodal management of patients with NEN. In the present review, we discuss surgical and non-surgical liver-targeted treatment approaches for NELM, each complementing the other, with a view to assisting physicians in optimizing multimodal NEN patient care.

Surgical Management of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases

Patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLMs) may develop carcinoid syndrome, carcinoid heart disease, or other symptoms from overproduction of hormones. Hepatic resection and cytoreduction is the most direct treatment of NETLMs in eligible patients, and cytoreduction improves symptoms, may reduce the sequelae of carcinoid syndrome, and extends survival. Parenchymal-sparing procedures, such as ablation and enucleation, should be considered during cytoreduction to maximize treatment of multifocal tumors while preserving healthy liver tissue. For patients with large hepatic tumor burdens, high-grade disease, or comorbidities precluding surgery, liver-directed and systemic therapies can be used to palliate symptoms and improve progression-free survival.

NETest is superior to chromogranin A in neuroendocrine neoplasia: a prospective ENETS CoE analysis

INTRODUCTION

The absence of a reliable, universal biomarker is a significant limitation in neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) management. We prospectively evaluated two CgA assays, (NEOLISA, EuroDiagnostica) and (CgA ELISA, Demeditec Diagnostics (DD)) and compared the results to the NETest.

METHODS

NEN cohort (n = 258): pancreatic, n = 67; small intestine, n = 40; appendiceal, n = 10; rectal, n = 45; duodenal, n = 9; gastric, n = 44; lung, n = 43. Image-positive disease (IPD) (n = 123), image & histology- negative (IND) (n = 106), and image-negative and histology positive (n = 29). CgA metrics: NEOLISA, ULN: 108 ng/mL, DD: ULN: 99 ng/mL. Data mean ± s.e.m. NETest: qRT-PCR - multianalyte analyses, ULN: 20. All samples de-identified and assessed blinded. Statistics: Mann-Whitney U-test, Pearson correlation and McNemar-test.

RESULTS

CgA positive in 53/258 (NEOLISA), 32 (DD) and NETest-positive in 157/258. In image- positive disease (IPD, n = 123), NEOLISA-positive: 33% and DD: 19%. NETest-positive: 122/123 (99%; McNemar's Chi2= 79-97, P < 0.0001). NEOLISA was more accurate than DD (P = 0.0003). In image- negative disease (IND), CgA was NEOLISA-positive (11%), DD (8%), P = NS, and NETest (33%). CgA assays could not distinguish progressive (PD) from stable disease (SD) or localized from metastatic disease (MD). NETest was significantly higher in PD (47 ± 5) than SD (29 ± 1, P = 0.0009). NETest levels in MD (35 ± 2) were elevated vs localized disease (24 ± 1.3, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

NETest, a multigenomic mRNA biomarker, was ~99% accurate in the identification of NEN disease. The CgA assays detected NEN disease in 19-33%. Multigenomic blood analysis using NETest is more accurate than CgA and should be considered the biomarker standard of care.

Survival and disease recurrence in patients operated for small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors at a referral hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) are slow growing but have frequently metastasized at the time of diagnosis. Most patients are operated with either curative intent or with intent to prolong overall survival. In the current study we have examined overall and disease-free survival in patients operated for SI-NETs.

METHODS

All patients with a histological diagnosis of SI-NET at St Olav's hospital in the period 1998-2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient, disease and treatment characteristics including European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) TNM staging classification, surgery type, time to recurrence and survival were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients were identified, whereof 54.3% male, median age at operation 68 years. The majority (n = 141 (75.8%)) underwent elective surgery and surgery was considered curative (radical) in 120 (64.5%) patients. Median estimated overall survival was 9.7 years (95% CI 7.6-11.8) for the entire population. Stage of disease, carcinoid heart disease, age, elective surgery, preoperatively known SI-NET, curative surgery and synchronous cancer were associated with survival in a multivariate analysis. Thirty-six of 120 (30%) patients had disease recurrence after a median follow-up time of 5.5 years, with a median estimated recurrence-free survival of 9.1 (5.4-12.9) years. Recurrence free survival was associated with age and synchronous cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SI-NETs had long overall survival which seemed influenced by stage of disease, presence of carcinoid heart disease, an elective surgery, preoperatively known SI-NET, age and synchronous cancer. Appropriate preoperative diagnostic procedures and elective surgeries seem beneficial and should be aimed for.

The Landmark Series: Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors are becoming increasingly prevalent, with many patients presenting with or developing metastatic disease to the liver.

METHODS

In this landmark series paper, we highlight the critical studies that have defined the surgical management of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases, as well as several randomized control trials which have investigated strategies for systemic control of metastatic disease.

RESULTS

Liver-directed surgical approaches and locally ablative procedures are recommended for patients with limited, resectable, and in some cases, nonresectable tumor burden. Angiographic liver-directed techniques, such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization, offer another approach for management in patients with liver-predominant disease. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a promising therapy for patients with hepatic and/or extrahepatic metastases. Various systemic medical therapies are also available as adjunct or definitive therapy for patients with metastatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This article reviews current data regarding management of neuroendocrine liver metastases and highlights areas for future study.

Surgery and Perioperative Management in Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) are the most prevalent small bowel neoplasms with an increasing frequency. In the multimodal management of SI-NETs, surgery plays a key role, either in curative intent, even if R0 resection is feasible in only 20% of patients due to advanced stage at diagnosis, or palliative intent. Surgeons must be informed about the specific surgical management of SI-NETs according to their hormonal secretion, their usual dissemination at the time of diagnosis and the need for bowel-preserving surgery to avoid short bowel syndrome. The aim of this paper is to review the surgical indications and techniques, and perioperative and postoperative management of SI-NETs.

[Indications for the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms]

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas (pNEN) have an increasing incidence and prevalence. Thus, this entity is of increasing clinical significance. Patients with pNEN become clinically apparent due to different and unspecific symptoms. Some tumours secrete hormones and peptides and become clinically symptomatic. In general, these tumours can metastasise early and even small tumours lead to distant metastases. Nonetheless, primary tumour size and grading are important prognostic factors. On the basis of a systematic literature research and the formulation of key issues according to the PICO system, therapeutic concepts were established. These concepts were evaluated with a Delphi process among the members of the pancreas research group and the indications for surgery group of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery. Thus this article gives an overview of the surgical treatment modalities and indications for the treatment of pNEN. Surgery is still the gold standard in treatment and the only potential chance of cure. Surgery is indicated for sporadic as well as hereditary pNEN > 2 cm independent of the functional activity. A so called "wait and see" strategy might be indicated in smaller pNEN; however, there is little evidence for this approach. In this respect, pNEN of 1 - 2 cm represent a surgical indication. The treatment of hereditary pNEN is challenging and should be interdisciplinary. Even in the case of distant metastases, a curative approach might be feasible and multimodal treatment is indicated.

Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN): French Intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, GTE, RENATEN, TENPATH, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR)

INTRODUCTION

This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) published in February 2020 (www.tncd.org).

METHODS

All French medical societies involved in the management of NEN took part in this work. Recommendations were graded into four categories (A, B, C or D), according to the level of evidence found in the literature until May 2019.

RESULTS

The management of NEN is challenging because of their heterogeneity and the increasing complexity of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pathological analysis is required for their diagnostic and prognostic characterization, which mainly relies on differentiation, grade and stage. The two main emergency situations are functioning syndromes and poorly-differentiated carcinoma. Chromogranin A is the main biochemical marker of NET, although of limited clinical interest. Initial characterization relies on morphological and isotopic imaging. The treatment of localized NET relies on watchful follow-up and local or surgical resection depending on its supposed aggressiveness. Treatment options for metastatic disease include surgery, somatostatin analogues, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, organ-driven locoregional therapies and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy. As specific predictive factors of treatment efficacy are yet to be identified and head-to-head comparisons have not or only rarely been performed, the therapeutic strategy currently depends on prognostic factors. Cumulative toxicity and the impact of treatment on quality of life must be considered since survival is relatively long in most patients with NET.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines are proposed to achieve the most beneficial therapeutic strategy in clinical practice as the therapeutic landscape of NEN is becoming ever more complex. These recommendations are permanently being reviewed.

Circulating Neuroendocrine Gene Transcripts (NETest): A Postoperative Strategy for Early Identification of the Efficacy of Radical Surgery for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Surgery remains the only treatment for the cure of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). Biomarkers to identify the completeness of resection and predict recurrence are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to evaluate if the blood measurement of neuroendocrine gene transcripts (NETest) was diagnostic of PanNETs, and whether NETest blood levels could identify complete resection. We compared transcript analysis with the biomarker chromogranin A (CgA).

METHODS

This was a prospective, longitudinal, single-center study including 30 patients with a postoperative histological confirmation of PanNET. Blood for NETest and CgA was collected preoperatively and on postoperative day (POD) 1, POD5, and POD30. Transcripts were measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and multianalyte algorithmic analysis (NETest; normal < 20), and CgA was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; normal < 109 ng/mL). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

RESULTS

Pancreatic surgical resections (n = 30) were R0, 26; R1, 2; and R2, 2. Preoperatively, NETest score was elevated in all 30 patients (44.7 ± 27), but postoperatively, NETest scores significantly decreased (p = 0.006) to POD30 (24.7 ± 24). The proportion of patients (15/30) with an elevated score significantly decreased by POD30 (p < 0.0001). CgA levels were elevated preoperatively (184 ± 360 ng/mL) in only 9/30 patients, but did not decrease significantly postoperatively at POD30 (260 ± 589 ng/mL, p = 0.398). The number of patients with elevated CgA levels remained unchanged (9/30).

CONCLUSIONS

The NETest is an accurate diagnostic biomarker for PanNETs (100%). A decrease in NETest levels after radical resection suggests this blood test provides early assessment of surgical efficacy. CgA had no clinical utility.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms constitute a diverse group of tumors that derive from the sensory and secretory neuroendocrine cells and predominantly arise within the pulmonary and gastrointestinal tracts. The majority of these neoplasms have a well-differentiated grade and are termed neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This subgroup is characterized by limited proliferation and patients affected by these tumors carry a good to moderate prognosis. A substantial subset of patients presenting with a NET suffer from the consequences of endocrine syndromes as a result of the excessive secretion of amines or peptide hormones, which can impair their quality of life and prognosis. Over the past 15 years, critical developments in tumor grading, diagnostic biomarkers, radionuclide imaging, randomized controlled drug trials, evidence-based guidelines, and superior prognostic outcomes have substantially altered the field of NET care. Here, we review the relevant advances to clinical practice that have significantly upgraded our approach to NET patients, both in diagnostic and in therapeutic options.

ALPPS in neuroendocrine liver metastases not amenable for conventional resection - lessons learned from an interim analysis of the International ALPPS Registry

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the most effective treatment option for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM). This study investigated the role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) as a novel strategy in treatment of NELM.

METHODS

The International ALPPS Registry was reviewed to study patients who underwent ALPPS for NELM.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2017, 954 ALPPS procedures from 135 international centers were recorded in the International ALPPS Registry. Of them, 24 (2.5%) were performed for NELM. Twenty-one patients entered the final analysis. Overall grade ≥3b morbidity was 9% after stage 1 and 27% after stage 2. Ninety-day mortality was 5%. R0 resection was achieved in 19 cases (90%) at stage 2. Median follow-up was 28 (19-48) months. Median disease free survival (DFS) was 17.3 (95% CI: 7.1-27.4) months, 1-year and 2-year DFS was 73.2% and 41.8%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. One-year and 2-year OS was 95.2% and 95.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ALPPS appears to be a suitable strategy for inclusion in the multimodal armamentarium of well-selected patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases. In light of the morbidity in this initial series and a high rate of disease-recurrence, the procedure should be taken with caution.

Risk factors for short recurrence-free survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) liver metastases: which patients should undergo resection?

Background: In the treatment of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), surgical resection is the first choice if curative resection is expected. However, most patients develop recurrence after resection of liver metastasis. Because one of the benefits of resection is to gain a tumor-free period for the patients, it is important to identify which patients achieve longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) by resection. In this study, the clinicopathological factors associated with RFS after resection of metastatic PanNETs in the liver were evaluated to identify the patient group that is suitable for resection.Methods: Consecutively diagnosed patients with PanNET liver metastasis with resection at our hospital from January 2000 to July 2019 were evaluated. A total of 26 metastatic PanNET patients with primary liver resections were evaluated. The median follow-up time was 48.3 months.Results: There were 18 NET recurrences of the total 26 resections, with a median RFS of 17.9 months. Independent risk factors for short RFS were a high Ki67 index (p = .009) and the number of resected tumors (p = .045). When the cut-off value for the Ki67 index was 5.0% and that for the number of resected tumors was 6, Ki67 > 5.0% tumors had shorter RFS (4.9 months vs. 38.2 months p = .006), and patients with tumors > = 7 tumors had shorter RFS (4.7 months vs. 27.5 months p = .001).Conclusions: These findings indicate that good candidates for resection of metastatic tumors of PanNETs could be patients with low Ki67 tumors and a small number of metastatic tumors.

Workup of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract or pancreas are rare. Their presentation overlaps with other intra-abdominal neoplasms, but can have unique features. The workup involves recognition of unusual clinical features associated with the tumors, imaging, analysis of blood or urine concentrations, and biopsy. Functional imaging takes advantage of the neuroendocrine tumor-specific expression of somatostatin receptors. There are characteristic features supporting the diagnosis on contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging. The use of tumor markers for biochemical diagnosis requires an understanding of the confounding variables affecting these assays. There are unique and specific immunohistochemical staining and grading requirements for appropriate diagnosis of these tumors.

The clinical applications of a multigene liquid biopsy (NETest) in neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

There are few effective biomarkers for neuroendocrine tumors. Precision oncology strategies have provided liquid biopsies for real-time and tailored decision-making. This has led to the development of the first neuroendocrine tumor liquid biopsy (the NETest). The NETest represents a transcriptomic signature of neuroendocrine tumor (NETs) that captures tumor biology and disease activity. The data have direct clinical application in terms of identifying residual disease, disease progress and the efficacy of treatment. In this overview we assess the available published information on the metrics and clinical efficacy of the NETest.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Published data on the NETest have been collated and analyzed to understand the clinical application of this multianalyte biomarker in NETs.

RESULTS

NETest assay has been validated as a standardized and reproducible clinical laboratory measurement. It is not affected by demographic characteristics, or acid suppressive medication. Clinical utility of the NETest has been documented in gastroenteropancreatic, bronchopulmonary NETs, in paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. The test facilitates accurate diagnosis of a NET disease, and real-time monitoring of the disease status (stable/progressive disease). It predicts aggressive tumor behavior, identifies operative tumor resection, and efficacy of the medical treatment (e.g. somatostatin analogues), or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). NETest metrics and clinical applications out-perform standard biomarkers like chromogranin A.

CONCLUSIONS

The NETest exhibits clinically competent metrics as an effective biomarker for neuroendocrine tumors. Measurement of NET transcripts in blood is a significant advance in neuroendocrine tumor management and demonstrates that blood provides a viable source to identify and monitor tumor status.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Small Bowel and Pancreas

The traditionally promulgated perspectives of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) as rare, indolent tumours are blunt and have been outdated for the last 2 decades. Clear increments in their incidence over the past decades render them increasingly clinically relevant, and at initial diagnosis many present with nodal and/or distant metastases (notably hepatic). The molecular pathogenesis of these tumours is increasingly yet incompletely understood. Those arising from the small bowel (SB) or pancreas typically occur sporadically; the latter may occur within the context of hereditary tumour predisposition syndromes. NENs can also be associated with endocrinopathy of hormonal hypersecretion. Tangible advances in the development of novel biomarkers, functional imaging modalities and therapy are especially applicable to this sub-set of tumours. The management of SB and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET) may be challenging, and often comprises a multidisciplinary approach wherein surgical, medical, interventional radiological and radiotherapeutic modalities are implemented. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of SB and pancreatic NETs. Moreover, we provide an outlook of the future in these tumour types which will include the development of precision oncology frameworks for individualised therapy, multi-analyte predictive biomarkers, artificial intelligence-derived clinical decision support tools and elucidation of the role of the microbiome in NEN development and clinical behaviour.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This manuscript is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The group reviewed a series of questions of specific interest to surgeons taking care of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and for each, the available literature was reviewed. What follows are these reviews for each question followed by recommendations of the panel.

Early Prediction of Treatment Response of Neuroendocrine Hepatic Metastases after Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 90Y-DOTATOC Using Diffusion Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI

The purpose of this study was to determine if parameters derived from diffusion-weighted (DW-) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can help to assess early response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC in neuroendocrine hepatic metastases (NET-HM). Twenty patients (10 male; 10 female; mean age: 59.2 years) with NET-HM were prospectively enrolled in this single-center imaging study. DW-MRI and DCE-MRI studies were performed just before and 48 hours after therapy with ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC. Abdominal SPECT/CT was performed 24 hours after therapy. This MRI imaging and therapy session was repeated after a mean interval of 10 weeks. Up to four lesions per patient were evaluated. Response to therapy was evaluated using metastasis sizes at the first and second therapy session as standard for comparison (regressive, stable, and progressive). DW-MRI analysis included the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and parameters related to intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), namely, diffusion (D), perfusion fraction (f) and pseudo-diffusion (D ^∗ ). DCE-MRI analysis comprised K_trans, v _e and k _ep. For statistical analysis of group differences, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and appropriate post hoc testing was performed. A total of 51 lesions were evaluated. Seven of 51 lesions (14%) showed size progression, 18/51 (35%) regression, and 26/51 (51%) remained stable. The lesion-to-spleen uptake ratio in SPECT showed a decrease between the two treatment sessions that was significantly stronger in regressive lesions compared with stable (p = 0.013) and progressive lesions (p = 0.021). ANOVA showed significant differences in mean ADC after 48 h (p = 0.026), with higher ADC values for regressive lesions. Regarding IVIM, highest values for D at baseline were seen in regressive lesions (p = 0.023). In DCE-MRI, a statistically significant increase in v _e after 10 weeks (p = 0.046) was found in regressive lesions. No differences were observed for the transfer constants K_trans and k _ep. Diffusion restriction quantified as ADC was able to differentiate regressive from progressive NET-HMs as early as 48 hours after PRRT. DW-MRI therefore may complement scintigraphy/SPECT for early assessment of response to PRRT. Assessment of perfusion parameters using IVIM and DCE-MRI did not show an additional benefit.

Association of a Prophylactic Surgical Approach to Stage IV Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors With Survival

Importance

Primary tumor resection and mesenteric lymph node dissection in asymptomatic patients with stage IV small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) are controversial.

Objective

To determine the association of locoregional surgery (LRS) performed at diagnosis with outcomes in patients with asymptomatic SI-NETs and distant metastases.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included asymptomatic patients with stage IV SI-NETs diagnosed from January 1, 1985, through December 31, 2015, and identified using the prospective database of SI-NETs from Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. Patients included were treated at a tertiary referral center and followed up until May 31, 2016, with data from the Swedish National Patient Register. The 363 patients with stage IV SI-NETs without abdominal symptoms were divided between those who underwent prophylactic up-front surgery within 6 months from diagnosis combined with oncologic treatment (hereafter referred to as LRS group [n = 161]) and those who underwent nonsurgical treatment or delayed surgery as needed combined with oncologic treatment (hereafer referred to as delayed LRS group [n = 202]).

Exposures

Prophylactic up-front surgery within 6 months from diagnosis combined with oncologic treatment vs nonsurgical treatment or delayed surgery as needed combined with oncologic treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival (OS), length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative morbidity and mortality, and reoperation rates measured from baseline. Propensity score matching was performed between the 2 groups.

Results

The 363 patients included 173 women (47.7%) and 190 men (52.3%), with a mean (SD) age at diagnosis of 62.4 (11.1) years. Two isonumerical groups with 91 patients in each resulted after propensity score matching. The LRS and delayed LRS groups were comparable in median OS (7.9 years [range, 5.1-10.7 years] vs 7.6 years [range, 5.8-9.5 years]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.70-1.37; log-rank P = .93) and cancer-specific survival (7.7 years [range, 4.5-10.8 years] vs 7.6 years [range, 5.6-9.7 years]; HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.71-1.40; log-rank P = .99). No difference was found in 30-day mortality (0 patients in both matched groups) or postoperative morbidity (2 [2.2%] vs 1 [1.1%]; P > .99), median LOS (73 days [range, 2-270 days] vs 76 days [range, 0-339 days]; P = .64) or LOS due to local tumor-related symptoms (7.0 days [range, 0-90 days] vs 11.5 days [range, 0-69 days]; P = .81), or incisional hernia repairs (4 patients [4.4%] in both groups; P > .99). Patients in the LRS group underwent more reoperative procedures (13 [14.3%]) compared with those in the delayed LRS group (3 [3.3%]) owing to intestinal obstruction (P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Prophylactic up-front LRS conferred no survival advantage in asymptomatic patients with stage IV SI-NETs. Delayed surgery as needed was comparable in all examined outcomes and was associated with fewer reoperations for intestinal obstruction. The value of a priori LRS in the presence of distant metastases is challenged and needs to be elucidated in a randomized clinical study.

Liver transplantation for unresectable malignancies: Beyond hepatocellular carcinoma

Indications for liver transplantation have expanded over the past few decades owing to improved outcomes and better understanding of underlying pathologies. In particular, there has been a growing interest in the field of transplant oncology in recent years that has led to considerable developments which have pushed the boundaries of malignant indications for liver transplantation beyond hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this article, we review and summarise the published evidence for liver transplantation in non-HCC primary and metastatic liver malignancies and highlight ongoing clinical trials that address unresolved questions therein. We also examine the current technical, immunological and oncological challenges that face liver transplantation in this growing field and explore potential approaches to overcome these barriers.

Hepatic micrometastases outside macrometastases are present in all patients with ileal neuroendocrine primary tumour at the time of liver resection

Background: Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) in the ileum grow slowly but metastasise to the liver at an early stage. After resection of the primary tumour and mesenteric lymph nodes, selected patients with liver metastases have been operated with curative intention. Recurrence-free survival seems low, suggesting that micrometastases are present in the liver at the time of surgery. We have therefore examined whether NET metastases could be detected in perceived normal liver tissue at the time of liver resection. Material and methods: Liver tissue outside the macrometastases from patients (n = 10) operated by liver resection due to metastases from ileal NETs G1/2, were examined for NE cells by immunohistochemistry. Liver tissue from patients operated for metastatic colon cancer was used as control (n = 6). Groups of ≥3 NE cells ≥3 mm from macrometastases were considered micrometastases. Clinical course was recorded retrospectively. Results: Ten of 10 patients had micrometastases, consisting of multiple groups of NE cells. None of the control patients had NE cells in the liver tissue. After median follow-up time of 5.5 (0.8-18.7) years 6 of 10 patients had developed recurrent NET metastases detected by cross-sectional imaging. The follow-up time of the four patients without detectable metastases was 4.8 (0.8-7.5) years vs. with detectable metastases 7.9 (3.2-18.7) years. Conclusions: All patient had micrometastases outside macrometastases at the time of liver resection, suggesting that subsequently recurrent liver metastases develop from NET depositions in the liver already present at the time of surgery. The likelihood of curation by hepatic resection appears very low.

Semi-quantitative visual assessment of hepatic tumor burden can reliably predict survival in neuroendocrine liver metastases treated with transarterial chemoembolization

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of semi-quantitative visual assessment of hepatic tumor burden (HTB) on MRI and to investigate its prognostic value in predicting overall survival (OS) in neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS

Three independent readers blinded to the quantitative HTB measurement reviewed baseline MRI in 111 NELM patients treated with TACE. Readers visually assessed and semi-quantitatively categorized HTB using the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) guidelines. Quantitative HTB measured by manual segmentation was used as the reference standard. Agreements between quantitative and semi-quantitative measurement of HTB, as well as intra- and inter-reader reproducibility, were evaluated using weighted kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Survival analysis included the Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. Harrell C-index was calculated to evaluate the prognostic value of semi-quantitative HTB for predicting OS.

RESULTS

According to quantitative HTB, 41, 29, 25, and 16 patients were categorized into ≤ 10%, 11-25%, 26-50%, and > 50% groups, respectively. Agreements between quantitative and semi-quantitative measurement of HTB by each reader (weighted kappa, 0.82-0.96), intra-reader agreement (weighted kappa, 0.95), and inter-reader agreements (weighted kappa, 0.84-0.91; ICC, 0.98) were at least substantial to almost perfect. Semi-quantitative HTB was an independent prognostic factor in NELMs treated with TACE (multivariate Cox regression, p < 0.001), with prognostic value comparable to that of quantitative HTB (Harrell C-index, 0.735 for both semi-quantitative and quantitative HTB in multivariate regression).

CONCLUSION

Semi-quantitative visual assessment of HTB using MRI is accurate and reproducible and could reliably predict OS in NELMs treated with TACE.

KEY POINTS

• Semi-quantitative visual assessment of HTB using MR imaging is considerably accurate, reproducible, and efficient. • Visually assessed semi-quantitative HTB serves as an independent predictor of OS in NELMs treated with TACE.