1
|
Virk S, Arora H, Patil P, Sarang B, Khajanchi M, Bains L, Kizhakke DV, Jain S, Nathani P, Dev Y, Gadgil A, Roy N. An Indian surgeon's perspective on management of asymptomatic gallstones. Asian J Endosc Surg 2024; 17:e13297. [PMID: 38439130 DOI: 10.1111/ases.13297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cholelithiasis is widely prevalent in India, with a majority of patients being asymptomatic while a small proportion experiencing mild complications. In the laparoscopic era, the rate of cholecystectomies has increased owing to early recovery and fewer complications. In asymptomatic patients, the risk of complications must be balanced against the treatment benefit. Recent guidelines suggest no prophylactic cholecystectomy in asymptomatic patients. We aimed to find out the Indian surgeons' perspective on asymptomatic gallstone management. METHODS A cross-sectional e-survey was conducted of practicing surgeons, onco-surgeons and gastrointestinal-surgeons in India. The survey had questions regarding their perspective on laparoscopic cholecystectomy and treatment modalities in asymptomatic gallstones. RESULTS A total of 196 surgeons responded to the survey. Their mean age was 42.3 years. Overall, 111 (57%) respondents worked in the private sector. Most surgeons (164) agreed that the rate of cholecystectomy has increased since the advent of laparoscopy; 137 (70%) respondents agreed that they would not operate on patients without risk factors. Common bile duct stones, chronic hemolytic diseases, transplant recipients, and diabetes mellitus were the risk factors. Majority of the participants agreed on not performing a cholecystectomy in patients with asymptomatic gallstones. CONCLUSION There exists a lack of consensus among Indian surgeons on asymptomatic gallstone management in India. Where the majority of cases are asymptomatic and do not require surgery, certain comorbidities can influence the line of treatment in individual patients. Currently, the treatment guidelines for asymptomatic patients need to be established as cholecystectomies may be overperformed due to the fear of development of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sargun Virk
- Department of General Surgery, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Harshit Arora
- Department of General Surgery, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Priti Patil
- Department of General Surgery, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of General Surgery, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) and Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Bhakti Sarang
- Department of General Surgery, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgery, Terna Medical College, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Monty Khajanchi
- Department of General Surgery, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgery, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Lovenish Bains
- Department of General Surgery, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Deepa Veetil Kizhakke
- Department of General Surgery, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgery, Manipal Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Samarvir Jain
- Department of General Surgery, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of General Surgery, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India
| | - Priyansh Nathani
- Department of General Surgery, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ya Dev
- Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, Trivandrum, India
| | - Anita Gadgil
- Department of General Surgery, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of General Surgery, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) and Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Nobhojit Roy
- Department of General Surgery, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steines L, Wirtz T. Large Population-based Study Exposes Higher Incidence and Mortality in Emergency Surgical Conditions in Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2023; 107:578-579. [PMID: 36245080 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Steines
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gomez D, Acuna SA, Joseph Kim S, Nantais J, Santiago R, Calzavara A, Saskin R, Baxter NN. Incidence and Mortality of Emergency General Surgery Conditions Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients in Ontario, Canada: A Population-based Analysis. Transplantation 2023; 107:753-761. [PMID: 36117253 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions and their outcomes are perceived to be disproportionately high among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). However, this has not been adequately investigated at a population level. We characterized the incidence and mortality of EGS conditions among SOTRs compared with nontransplant patients. METHODS Data were collected through linked administrative population-based databases in Ontario, Canada. We included all adult SOTRs (kidney, liver, heart, and lung) who underwent transplantation between 2002 and 2017. We then identified posttransplantation emergency department visits for EGS conditions (appendicitis, cholecystitis, choledocolithiasis, perforated diverticulitis, incarcerated/strangulated hernias, small bowel obstruction, and perforated peptic ulcer). Age-, sex-, and year-standardized incidence rate ratios (SIRRs) were generated. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate association between transplantation status and 30 d mortality after adjusting for demographics, year, and comorbidities. RESULTS Ten thousand seventy-three SOTRs and 12 608 135 persons were analyzed. SOTRs developed 881 EGS conditions (non-SOTRs: 552 194 events). The incidence of all EGS conditions among SOTR was significantly higher compared with the nontransplant patients [SIRR 3.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.32-3.82)], even among those with high Aggregated Diagnosis Groups scores ( > 10) [SIRR 2.76 (95% CI 2.53-3.00)]. SOTRs were 1.4 times more likely to die at 30 d [adjusted odds ratio 1.44 (95% CI 1.08-1.91)] after an EGS event compared with nontransplant patients, predominantly amongst lung transplant recipients [adjusted odds ratio 3.28 (95% CI 1.72-6.24)]. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of EGS conditions is significantly higher in SOTRs even after stratifying by comorbidity burden. This is of particular importance as SOTRs also have a higher likelihood of death after an EGS condition, especially lung transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Gomez
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sergio A Acuna
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Joseph Kim
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and Kidney Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jordan Nantais
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robin Santiago
- Canadian Institute of Health Information, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coccolini F, Improta M, Sartelli M, Rasa K, Sawyer R, Coimbra R, Chiarugi M, Litvin A, Hardcastle T, Forfori F, Vincent JL, Hecker A, Ten Broek R, Bonavina L, Chirica M, Boggi U, Pikoulis E, Di Saverio S, Montravers P, Augustin G, Tartaglia D, Cicuttin E, Cremonini C, Viaggi B, De Simone B, Malbrain M, Shelat VG, Fugazzola P, Ansaloni L, Isik A, Rubio I, Kamal I, Corradi F, Tarasconi A, Gitto S, Podda M, Pikoulis A, Leppaniemi A, Ceresoli M, Romeo O, Moore EE, Demetrashvili Z, Biffl WL, Wani I, Tolonen M, Duane T, Dhingra S, DeAngelis N, Tan E, Abu-Zidan F, Ordonez C, Cui Y, Labricciosa F, Perrone G, Di Marzo F, Peitzman A, Sakakushev B, Sugrue M, Boermeester M, Nunez RM, Gomes CA, Bala M, Kluger Y, Catena F. Acute abdomen in the immunocompromised patient: WSES, SIS-E, WSIS, AAST, and GAIS guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:40. [PMID: 34372902 PMCID: PMC8352154 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00380-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunocompromised patients are a heterogeneous and diffuse category frequently presenting to the emergency department with acute surgical diseases. Diagnosis and treatment in immunocompromised patients are often complex and must be multidisciplinary. Misdiagnosis of an acute surgical disease may be followed by increased morbidity and mortality. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of surgical disease occur; these patients may seek medical assistance late because their symptoms are often ambiguous. Also, they develop unique surgical problems that do not affect the general population. Management of this population must be multidisciplinary.This paper presents the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Surgical Infection Society Europe (SIS-E), World Surgical Infection Society (WSIS), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), and Global Alliance for Infection in Surgery (GAIS) joined guidelines about the management of acute abdomen in immunocompromised patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Coccolini
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisa, 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Mario Improta
- grid.8982.b0000 0004 1762 5736Emergency Department, Pavia University Hospital, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Kemal Rasa
- Department of Surgery, Anadolu Medical Center, Kocaali, Turkey
| | - Robert Sawyer
- grid.268187.20000 0001 0672 1122General Surgery Department, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI USA
| | - Raul Coimbra
- grid.488519.90000 0004 5946 0028Department of General Surgery, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA USA
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisa, 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrey Litvin
- grid.410686.d0000 0001 1018 9204Department of Surgical Disciplines, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia
| | - Timothy Hardcastle
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Mayville, South Africa
| | - Francesco Forfori
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209Intensive Care Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Jean-Louis Vincent
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Departement of Intensive Care, Erasme Univ Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Andreas Hecker
- grid.411067.50000 0000 8584 9230Departementof General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Richard Ten Broek
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382General Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- grid.416351.40000 0004 1789 6237General Surgery, San Donato Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Mircea Chirica
- grid.450307.5General Surgery, CHUGA-CHU Grenoble Alpes UGA-Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Ugo Boggi
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209General Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Emmanuil Pikoulis
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 08003rd Department of Surgery, Attiko Hospital, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- grid.18887.3e0000000417581884General Surgery, Varese University Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Philippe Montravers
- grid.411119.d0000 0000 8588 831XDépartement d’Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Goran Augustin
- grid.4808.40000 0001 0657 4636Department of Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Centre and School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Dario Tartaglia
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisa, 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Enrico Cicuttin
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisa, 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Camilla Cremonini
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisa, 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Bruno Viaggi
- grid.24704.350000 0004 1759 9494ICU Department, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- grid.418056.e0000 0004 1765 2558Department of Digestive, Metabolic and Emergency Minimally Invasive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy/Saint Germain en Laye, Saint Germain en Laye, France
| | - Manu Malbrain
- grid.8767.e0000 0001 2290 8069Faculty of Engineering, Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vishal G. Shelat
- General and Emergency Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- grid.8982.b0000 0004 1762 5736General and Emergency Surgery, Pavia University Hospital, Pavia, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- grid.8982.b0000 0004 1762 5736General and Emergency Surgery, Pavia University Hospital, Pavia, Italy
| | - Arda Isik
- grid.411776.20000 0004 0454 921XGeneral Surgery, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ines Rubio
- grid.81821.320000 0000 8970 9163Department of General Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Itani Kamal
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XGeneral Surgery, VA Boston Health Care System, Boston University, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Francesco Corradi
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209Intensive Care Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Tarasconi
- grid.411482.aGeneral Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Stefano Gitto
- grid.8404.80000 0004 1757 2304Gastroenterology and Transplant Unit, Firenze University Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- grid.7763.50000 0004 1755 3242General and Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Anastasia Pikoulis
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 0800Medical Department, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ari Leppaniemi
- grid.15485.3d0000 0000 9950 5666Abdominal Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- grid.18887.3e0000000417581884General Surgery, Monza University Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Oreste Romeo
- grid.268187.20000 0001 0672 1122Department of Surgery, Western Michigan University School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI USA
| | - Ernest E. Moore
- grid.239638.50000 0001 0369 638XTrauma Surgery, Denver Health, Denver, CL USA
| | - Zaza Demetrashvili
- grid.412274.60000 0004 0428 8304General Surgery, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Walter L. Biffl
- grid.415402.60000 0004 0449 3295Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Imitiaz Wani
- General Surgery, Government Gousia Hospital, Srinagar, Kashmir India
| | - Matti Tolonen
- grid.15485.3d0000 0000 9950 5666Abdominal Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Sameer Dhingra
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hajipur (NIPER-H), Vaishali, Bihar India
| | - Nicola DeAngelis
- grid.50550.350000 0001 2175 4109General Surgery Department, Henry Mondor University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Edward Tan
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Emergency Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Fikri Abu-Zidan
- General Surgery, UAE University Hospital, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Carlos Ordonez
- grid.8271.c0000 0001 2295 7397Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fundación Valle del Lili, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- grid.265021.20000 0000 9792 1228Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | | | - Gennaro Perrone
- grid.411482.aGeneral Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Andrew Peitzman
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000General Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- First Clinic of General Surgery, University Hospital St George Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Michael Sugrue
- General Surgery, Letterkenny Hospital, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | - Marja Boermeester
- grid.5650.60000000404654431Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Carlos Augusto Gomes
- Department of Surgery, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora, Hospital Universitário Terezinha de Jesus, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
| | - Miklosh Bala
- grid.17788.310000 0001 2221 2926General Surgery, Hadassah Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yoram Kluger
- General Sugery, Ramabam Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Fausto Catena
- grid.411482.aGeneral Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
SELSI Consensus Statement for Safe Cholecystectomy — Prevention and Management of Bile Duct Injury — Part A. Indian J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-019-01993-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
6
|
Weaver L, Parsikia A, Colvin J, Siskind EJ, Ortiz J. Kidney and pancreas transplant recipients undergoing cholecystectomy experience superior outcomes in transplant centers. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:609-617. [PMID: 32981828 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This retrospective analysis aims to identify differences in surgical outcomes between pancreas and/or kidney transplant recipients and the general population undergoing cholecystectomy. METHODS Multivariate logistic regression and linear regression tests computed odds ratios (OR) and coefficients of the linear regression by analyzing weighted data from the NIS database between 2005 and 2014 to identify differences in mortality, morbidity, length of stay (LOS) and costs amongst KTx, PTx, PKTx, and non-Tx undergoing cholecystectomy in all centers and transplant centers. RESULTS Overall 6007 KTx, 164 PTx, 535 PKTx, and 4,207,241 non-Tx met the inclusion criteria. Mortality from cholecystectomy was 1.0%. Transplant recipients did not experience a significant increase in mortality. However KTx and PTx suffered increased morbidity risks (KTx OR1.244 p < 0.01; PTx OR2.165 p < 0.01) compared to non-Tx. However transplant recipients did not incur an increased morbidity risk in transplant centers. CONCLUSION Transplant recipients undergoing cholecystectomy should be counseled about their increased complication risks. Surgeons should consider transferring KTx and PTx to transplant centers for their cholecystectomy procedure to mitigate these risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Weaver
- University of Minnesota, Department of Surgery, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA.
| | - Afshin Parsikia
- University of Pennsylvania, Division of Gastroenterology, 421 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104 USA
| | - Juliana Colvin
- University of Minnesota, Department of Surgery, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA
| | - Eric J Siskind
- Albany Medical Center, Department of Transplant Surgery, 43 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY, 12208, USA
| | - Jorge Ortiz
- Albany Medical Center, Department of Transplant Surgery, 43 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY, 12208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Emergency general surgery procedures in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Am J Surg 2019; 218:972-977. [PMID: 30862354 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 01/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes of emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures on hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HST) recipients have not been defined in a large, national database. Whether EGS during HST engraftment admission, or in HST patients with graft versus host disease (GVHD) results in worse outcomes is unknown. METHODS The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was examined for patients with a history of BMT between 2001 and 2014. RESULTS There were 520,000 HST admissions meeting inclusion criteria, of which, 14,143 (2.7%) required EGS. Of those requiring EGS, 378 (2.7%) were during engraftment admission and 13,765 (97.3%) on subsequent admission. For those requiring EGS during subsequent admission, 9,920 (72.1%) had a history of GVHD and 3,845 (27.9%) did not. On multivariate analysis, requirement of EGS was associated with mortality (OR: 1.71, 95%CI: 1.47-1.99, p < 0.001). For patients requiring EGS, engraftment admission or GVHD was not associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS While EGS results in worse survival for the HST population, patients in their engraftment admission do not appear to be at increased mortality risk. In addition, GVHD does not worsen survival.
Collapse
|
8
|
Charilaou P, Agnihotri K, Garcia P, Badheka A, Frenia D, Yegneswaran B. Trends of Cannabis Use Disorder in the Inpatient: 2002 to 2011. Am J Med 2017; 130:678-687.e7. [PMID: 28161344 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Revised: 12/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The nationwide prevalence of cannabis use/abuse has more than doubled from 2002 to 2011. Whether the outpatient trend is reflected in the inpatient setting is unknown. We examined the prevalence and incidence of cannabis abuse/dependence as determined by discharge coding in a 10-year (2002-2011) National Inpatient Sample, as well as various trends among demographics, comorbidities, and hospitalization outcomes. METHODS Cannabis abuse/dependence was identified on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes 304.3* and 305.2* in adults aged 18 years or more. We excluded cases coded "in remission." National estimates of trends and matched-regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS Overall, 2,833,567 (0.91%) admissions with documented cannabis abuse/dependence were identified, patients had a mean age of 35.12 ± 0.06 years, 62% were male, and there was an increasing trend in prevalence from 0.52% to 1.34% (P <.001). The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 0.47 ± 0.006, and inpatient mortality was 0.41%. All of the above demonstrated an increasing trend (P <.001). Mean length of stay was 6.23 ± 0.06 days. The top primary discharge diagnoses were schizoaffective/mood disorders, followed by psychotic disorders and alcoholism. Asthma prevalence in nontobacco smokers had a steeper increase in the cannabis subgroup than in the noncannabis subgroup (P = .002). Among acute pancreatitis admissions, cannabis abusers had a shorter length of stay (-11%) and lower hospitalization costs (-7%) than nonabusers. CONCLUSION Cannabis abuse/dependence is on the rise in the inpatient population, with an increasing trend toward older and sicker patients with increasing rates of moderate to severe disability. Psychiatric disorders and alcoholism are the main associated primary conditions. Cannabis abuse is associated with increased asthma incidence in nontobacco smokers and decreased hospital resource use in acute pancreatitis admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paris Charilaou
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rutgers/Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ.
| | - Kanishk Agnihotri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rutgers/Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Pablo Garcia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rutgers/Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Apurva Badheka
- Department of Interventional and Structural Heart Disease, The Everett Clinic, Everett, Wash
| | - Douglas Frenia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rutgers/Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Balaji Yegneswaran
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rutgers/Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Varga M, Kudla M, Vargova L, Fronek J. Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis After Renal Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2017; 48:2072-5. [PMID: 27569946 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.02.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2015] [Revised: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to evaluate the rate of surgical complications, patient outcomes, and impact on graft function in renal transplant recipients in whom cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed. METHODS We reviewed data on transplant patients from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2013. The subgroup of patients who required subsequent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was assessed, and their data were further analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-one patients who underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis after renal transplantation were included in the study. Clinical signs such as pain in the right upper quadrant, temperature >38°C, and elevation in bilirubin levels occurred in 20 (64.5%), 8 (25.8%), and 3 (9.7%) patients, respectively. Ultrasound signs of acute cholecystitis were present in 27 patients (87.1%). In terms of laboratory values, white blood cell counts >10 × 10(9)/L occurred in 17 patients (54.8%), and C-reactive protein levels >40 mg/L were reported in 21 patients (67.7%). The conversion rate to open surgery was 32.3% (10 patients). In 13 cases, acalculous cholecystitis was present (41.9%). The average serum creatinine level 1 year after cholecystectomy had no statistically significant differences. One patient required temporary dialysis during the postoperative period (with subsequent graft recovery), and 1 graft was lost. CONCLUSIONS Acute cholecystitis in kidney transplant recipients is a serious complication, with frequent difficulties related to evaluation and diagnosis. Because clinical signs could be very mild compared with severity of gallbladder affliction, there is little room if any for conservative treatment in these patients. We have not noticed adverse impact of acute cholecystitis on 1-year graft function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Varga
- Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie, Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg-Universitätsklinikum der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität, Salzburg, Österreich; Transplant Surgery Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - M Kudla
- Transplant Surgery Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Vargova
- Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J Fronek
- Transplant Surgery Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
de'Angelis N, Esposito F, Memeo R, Lizzi V, Martìnez-Pérez A, Landi F, Genova P, Catena F, Brunetti F, Azoulay D. Emergency abdominal surgery after solid organ transplantation: a systematic review. World J Emerg Surg 2016; 11:43. [PMID: 27582783 PMCID: PMC5006611 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-016-0101-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Due to the increasing number of solid organs transplantations, emergency abdominal surgery in transplanted patients is becoming a relevant challenge for the general surgeon. The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to analyze morbidity and mortality of emergency abdominal surgery performed in transplanted patients for graft-unrelated surgical problems. METHODS The literature search was performed on online databases with the time limit 1990-2015. Studies describing all types of emergency abdominal surgery in solid organ transplanted patients were retrieved for evaluation. RESULTS Thirty-nine case series published between 1996 and 2015 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for the systematic review. Overall, they included 71671 transplanted patients, of which 1761 (2.5 %) underwent emergency abdominal surgery. The transplanted organs were the heart in 65.8 % of patients, the lung in 22.1 %, the kidney in 9.5 %, and the liver in 2.6 %. The mean patients' age at the time of the emergency abdominal surgery was 49.4 ± 7.4 years, and the median time from transplantation to emergency surgery was 2.4 years (range 0.1-20). Indications for emergency abdominal surgery were: gallbladder diseases (80.3 %), gastrointestinal perforations (9.2 %), complicated diverticulitis (6.2 %), small bowel obstructions (2 %), and appendicitis (2 %). The overall mortality was 5.5 % (range 0-17.5 %). The morbidity rate varied from 13.6 % for gallbladder diseases to 32.7 % for complicated diverticulitis. Most of the time, the immunosuppressive therapy was maintained unmodified postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Emergency abdominal surgery in transplanted patients is not a rare event. Although associated with relevant mortality and morbidity, a prompt and appropriate surgery can lead to satisfactory results if performed taking into account the patient's immunosuppression therapy and hemodynamic stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de'Angelis
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, "Henri Mondor" University Hospital, Université Paris Est - UPEC, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - Francesco Esposito
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, "Henri Mondor" University Hospital, Université Paris Est - UPEC, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
| | - Vincenzo Lizzi
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, "Henri Mondor" University Hospital, Université Paris Est - UPEC, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - Aleix Martìnez-Pérez
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, "Henri Mondor" University Hospital, Université Paris Est - UPEC, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - Filippo Landi
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, "Henri Mondor" University Hospital, Université Paris Est - UPEC, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - Pietro Genova
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, "Henri Mondor" University Hospital, Université Paris Est - UPEC, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, University Hospital "Ospedale Maggiore" of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Francesco Brunetti
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, "Henri Mondor" University Hospital, Université Paris Est - UPEC, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - Daniel Azoulay
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, "Henri Mondor" University Hospital, Université Paris Est - UPEC, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Examining Noncardiac Surgical Procedures in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. ASAIO J 2016; 61:520-5. [PMID: 26102174 DOI: 10.1097/mat.0000000000000258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
As extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used for patients with cardiac and/or pulmonary failure, the need for noncardiac surgical procedures (NCSPs) in these patients will continue to increase. This study examined the NCSP required in patients supported with ECMO and determined which variables affect outcomes. The National Inpatient Sample Database was examined for patients supported with ECMO from 2007 to 2010. There were 563 patients requiring ECMO during the study period. Of these, 269 (47.8%) required 380 NCSPs. There were 149 (39.2%) general surgical procedures, with abdominal exploration/bowel resection (18.2%) being most common. Vascular (29.5%) and thoracic procedures (23.4%) were also common. Patients requiring NCSP had longer median length of stay (15.5 vs. 9.2 days, p = 0.001), more wound infections (7.4% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.02), and more bleeding complications (27.9% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.01). The incidences of other complications and inpatient mortality (54.3% vs. 58.2%, p = 0.54) were similar. On logistic regression, the requirement of NCSPs was not associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-1.23, p = 0.17). However, requirement of blood transfusion was associated with mortality (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.06-2.74, p = 0.03). Although NCSPs in patients supported with ECMO does not increase mortality, it results in increased morbidity and longer hospital stay.
Collapse
|
12
|
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones. J Hepatol 2016; 65:146-181. [PMID: 27085810 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 267] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
13
|
|
14
|
Ambur V, Taghavi S, Kadakia S, Jayarajan S, Gaughan J, Sjoholm LO, Pathak A, Santora T, Rappold J, Goldberg AJ. Does socioeconomic status predict outcomes after cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 2016; 213:100-104. [PMID: 27475221 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Revised: 04/19/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was performed to evaluate the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on outcomes after cholecystectomy. METHODS The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2005 to 2011) was queried for patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Clinically relevant variables were used to examine clinical characteristics, postoperative complications, and mortality. SES was investigated by examining income quartile. RESULTS More than 2 million patients underwent cholecystectomy during this period. They were divided into quartiles by SES. The lowest cohort was younger (50 years, P < .001) and had the lowest Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.08, P < .001). This cohort was more likely African American (15.8%, P < .001) and more likely to have Medicaid (19.2%, P < .001). Using split-sample validation and multivariate analysis, lower SES, Charlson comorbidity Index, and Medicaid recipients were associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS Patients with Medicaid and lower SES had poorer outcomes after cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishnu Ambur
- Temple University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Sharven Taghavi
- Barnes Jewish Hospital/Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Surgery, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sagar Kadakia
- Temple University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Senthil Jayarajan
- Barnes Jewish Hospital/Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Surgery, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - John Gaughan
- Temple University School of Medicine, Biostatistics Consulting Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lars Ola Sjoholm
- Temple University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Abhijit Pathak
- Temple University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thomas Santora
- Temple University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joseph Rappold
- Temple University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy J Goldberg
- Temple University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ambur V, Taghavi S, Jayarajan S, Gaughan J, Toyoda Y, Dauer E, Sjoholm LO, Pathak A, Santora T, Goldberg AJ. Comparing open gastrostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in heart transplant patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2016; 7:71-4. [PMID: 27141303 PMCID: PMC4840285 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Revised: 03/16/2016] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Impaired wound healing due to immunosuppression has led some surgeons to preferentially use open gastrostomy tube (OGT) over percutaneous gastrostomy tube (PEG) in heart transplant patients when long-term enteral access is deemed necessary. Methods The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2005–2010) was queried for all heart transplant patients. Those receiving OGT were compared to those treated with PEG tube. Results There were 498 patients requiring long-term enteral access treated with a gastrostomy tube, with 424 (85.2%) receiving a PEG and 74 (14.8%) an OGT. The PEG cohort had higher Charlson comorbidity Index (4.1 vs. 2.0, p = 0.002) and a higher incidence of post-operative acute renal failure (31.5 vs. 12.7%, p = 0.001). Post-operative mortality was not different when comparing the two groups (13.8 vs. 6.1%, p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, while both PEG (OR: 7.87, 95%C.I: 5.88–10.52, p < 0.001) and OGT (OR 5.87, 95%CI: 2.19–15.75, p < 0.001) were independently associated with mortality, PEG conferred a higher mortality risk. Conclusions This is the largest reported study to date comparing outcomes between PEG and OGT in heart transplant patients. PEG does not confer any advantage over OGT in this patient population with respect to morbidity, mortality, and length of stay. OGT may result in less mortality than PEG in heart transplant patients. Complications occur more frequently when heart transplant recipients receive PEG. PEG in heart transplant recipients does not result in decreased LOS or total cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishnu Ambur
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Corresponding author. Temple University Hospital, 3401 N. Broad Street, Parkinson Pavilion, Suite 400, Philadelphia, 19140, PA, USA. Tel.: +1 2157073133.Temple University Hospital3401 N. Broad StreetParkinson PavilionSuite 400PhiladelphiaPA19140USA
| | - Sharven Taghavi
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Senthil Jayarajan
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John Gaughan
- Temple University School of Medicine, Biostatistics Consulting Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yoshiya Toyoda
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Dauer
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lars Ola Sjoholm
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Abhijit Pathak
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thomas Santora
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy J. Goldberg
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Taghavi S, Ambur V, Jayarajan S, Gaughan J, Toyoda Y, Dauer E, Sjoholm LO, Pathak A, Santora T, Goldberg AJ. Comparison of open gastrostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in lung transplant patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2015; 5:76-80. [PMID: 26900455 PMCID: PMC4724026 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.12.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2015] [Revised: 11/28/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lung transplant patients require a high degree of immunosuppression, which can impair wound healing when surgical procedures are required. We hypothesized that because of impaired healing, lung transplant patients requiring gastrostomy tubes would have better outcomes with open gastrostomy tube (OGT) as compared to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG). Methods The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database (2005–2010) was queried for all lung transplant recipients requiring OGT or PEG. Results There were 215 patients requiring gastrostomy tube, with 44 OGT and 171 PEG. The two groups were not different with respect to age (52.0 vs. 56.9 years, p = 0.40) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.3 vs. 3.5, p = 0.75). Incidence of acute renal failure was higher in the PEG group (35.2 vs. 11.8%, p = 0.003). Post-operative pneumonia, myocardial infarction, surgical site infection, DVT/PE, and urinary tract infection were not different. Post-operative mortality was higher in the PEG group (11.2 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.02). Using multiple variable analysis, PEG tube was independently associated with mortality (HR: 1.94, 95%C.I: 1.45–2.58). Variables associated with survival included age, female gender, white race, and larger hospital bed capacity. Discussion OGT may be the preferred method of gastric access for lung transplant recipients. Conclusions In lung transplant recipients, OGT results in decreased morbidity and mortality when compared to PEG. In lung transplant patients, open gastrostomy tube may result in less mortality than a percutaneous gastrostomy tube. In-hospital complications are less when lung transplant recipients receive open gastrostomy as compared to PEG. PEG in lung transplant recipients does not result in decreased length of stay when compared to open gastrostomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharven Taghavi
- Washington University in St. Louis, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Corresponding author. Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8234, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.Washington University in St. Louis660 S Euclid AveCampus Box 8234St. LouisMO63110USA
| | - Vishnu Ambur
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Senthil Jayarajan
- Washington University in St. Louis, Section of Vascular Surgery, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - John Gaughan
- Temple University School of Medicine, Biostatistics Consulting Center, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Yoshiya Toyoda
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Elizabeth Dauer
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Lars Ola Sjoholm
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Abhijit Pathak
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Thomas Santora
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Amy J. Goldberg
- Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Postoperative outcomes with cholecystectomy in lung transplant recipients. Surgery 2015; 158:373-8. [PMID: 25999250 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2014] [Revised: 02/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a paucity of data on outcomes for lung transplant (LT) recipients requiring general surgery procedures. This study examined outcomes after cholecystectomy in LT recipients using a large database. METHODS The National Inpatient Sample Database (2005-2010) was queried for all LT patients requiring laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC). RESULTS There were a total of 377 cholecystectomies performed in LT patients. The majority were done for acute cholecystitis (n = 218; 57%) and were done urgently/emergently (n = 258; 68%). There were a total of 304 (81%) laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 73 (19%) OC. There was no difference in age when comparing the laparoscopic and open groups (53.6 vs 55.5 years; P = .39). In addition, the Charlson Comorbidity Index was similar in the 2 groups (P = .07). Patients undergoing OC were more likely to have perioperative myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus, or any complication compared with the laparoscopic group. Total hospital charges ($59,137.00 vs $106,329.80; P = .03) and median duration of stay (4.0 vs 8.0 days; P = .02) were both greater with open compared with LC. CONCLUSION Cholecystectomy can be performed safely in the LT population with minimal morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
|
18
|
Agresta F, Campanile FC, Vettoretto N, Silecchia G, Bergamini C, Maida P, Lombari P, Narilli P, Marchi D, Carrara A, Esposito MG, Fiume S, Miranda G, Barlera S, Davoli M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2015; 400:429-53. [PMID: 25850631 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-015-1300-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard technique for gallbladder diseases in both acute and elective surgery. Nevertheless, reports from national surveys still seem to represent some doubts regarding its diffusion. There is neither a wide consensus on its indications nor on its possible related morbidity. On the other hand, more than 25 years have passed since the introduction of LC, and we have all witnessed the exponential growth of knowledge, skill and technology that has followed it. In 1995, the EAES published its consensus statement on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in which seven main questions were answered, according to the available evidence. During the following 20 years, there have been several additional guidelines on LC, mainly focused on some particular aspect, such as emergency or concomitant biliary tract surgery. METHODS In 2012, several Italian surgical societies decided to revisit the clinical recommendations for the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of gallbladder diseases in adults, to update and supplement the existing guidelines with recommendations that reflect what is known and what constitutes good practice concerning LC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinando Agresta
- Department of Surgery, Presidio Ospedaliero di Adria (RO), Adria, RO, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eachempati SR, Cocanour CS, Dultz LA, Phatak UR, Albarado R, Rob Todd S. Acute cholecystitis in the sick patient. Curr Probl Surg 2014; 51:441-66. [PMID: 25497405 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2014.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|