1
|
Sofuni A, Asai Y, Mukai S, Yamamoto K, Itoi T. High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for pancreatic cancer. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2022:10.1007/s10396-022-01208-4. [PMID: 35551555 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-022-01208-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) has one of the poorest prognoses among solid cancers, and its incidence has increased recently. Satisfactory outcomes are not achieved with current therapies; thus, novel treatments are urgently needed. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel therapy for ablating tissue from the outside of the body by focusing ultrasonic waves from multiple sources on the tumor. In this therapy, only the focal area is heated to 80-100 ºC, which causes coagulative necrosis of the tissue, with hardly any impact on the tissue outside the focal area. Although HIFU is a minimally invasive treatment and is expected to be useful, it is not yet generally known. Here, we discuss the usefulness of HIFU treatment for un-resectable advanced PC using the results of previous research, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews on its efficacy and safety. HIFU therapy for un-resectable PC is useful for its anti-tumor effect and pain relief, and is expected to prolong survival time and improve quality of life. Although HIFU for PC has several limitations and further study is needed, this technique can be safely performed on un-resectable advanced PC. In future, HIFU could be utilized as a minimally invasive treatment strategy for PC patients with a poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Sofuni
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.
| | - Yasutsugu Asai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Shuntaro Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sofuni A, Asai Y, Tsuchiya T, Ishii K, Tanaka R, Tonozuka R, Honjo M, Mukai S, Nagai K, Yamamoto K, Matsunami Y, Kurosawa T, Kojima H, Homma T, Minami H, Nakatsubo R, Hirakawa N, Miyazawa H, Nagakawa Y, Tsuchida A, Itoi T. Novel Therapeutic Method for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer-The Impact of the Long-Term Research in Therapeutic Effect of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Therapy. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:4845-4861. [PMID: 34898585 PMCID: PMC8628685 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28060409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel advanced therapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). HIFU therapy with chemotherapy is being promoted as a novel method to control local advancement by tumor ablation. We evaluated the therapeutic effects of HIFU therapy in locally advanced and metastatic PC. PC patients were treated with HIFU as an optional local therapy and systemic chemotherapy. The FEP-BY02 (Yuande Bio-Medical Engineering) HIFU device was used under ultrasound guidance. Of 176 PC patients, 89 cases were Stage III and 87 were Stage IV. The rate of complete tumor ablation was 90.3%, while that of symptom relief was 66.7%. The effectiveness on the primary lesions were as follows: complete response (CR): n = 0, partial response (PR): n = 21, stable disease (SD): n = 106, and progressive disease (PD): n = 49; the primary disease control rate was 72.2%. Eight patients underwent surgery. The median survival time (MST) after diagnosis for HIFU with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone (100 patients in our hospital) was 648 vs. 288 days (p < 0.001). Compared with chemotherapy alone, the combination of HIFU therapy and chemotherapy demonstrated significant prolongation of prognosis. This study suggests that HIFU therapy has the potential to be a novel combination therapy for unresectable PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Sofuni
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Yasutsugu Asai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Takayoshi Tsuchiya
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Kentaro Ishii
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Reina Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Ryosuke Tonozuka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Mitsuyoshi Honjo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Shuntaro Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Kazumasa Nagai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Kenjiro Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Yukitoshi Matsunami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Takashi Kurosawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Hiroyuki Kojima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Toshihiro Homma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Hirohito Minami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Ryosuke Nakatsubo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Noriyuki Hirakawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Hideaki Miyazawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| | - Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.N.); (A.T.)
| | - Akihiko Tsuchida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.N.); (A.T.)
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (Y.A.); (T.T.); (K.I.); (R.T.); (R.T.); (M.H.); (S.M.); (K.N.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.K.); (H.K.); (T.H.); (H.M.); (R.N.); (N.H.); (H.M.); (T.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin J, Wu AL, Teng F, Xian YT, Xu XJ. Stent insertion for inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison of radioactive and normal stenting. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e26192. [PMID: 34032780 PMCID: PMC8154471 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000026192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
To assess effectiveness and safety associated with radioactive stenting for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) patients.This single-center retrospective study compared baseline and treatment data of recruited consecutive patients with HCCA underwent either normal or radioactive stenting between January 2016 and December 2019. Clinical success was defined by total bilirubin (TBIL) levels falling below 70% of the preoperative baseline within 2 weeks post stent insertion.Sixty-five patients with inoperable HCCA underwent normal (n = 35) or radioactive (n = 30) stenting at our center. Technical success of both types of the normal and radioactive stent insertion was 100%. Each patient received 1 stent. In the radioactive stent group, each patient received 1 radioactive seed strand (RSS), containing 10 to 12 radioactive seeds. Clinical success rates were 86.8% and 100% in normal and radioactive groups, respectively (P = .495). We observed stent dysfunction in 9 patients (normal group) and 7 patients (radioactive group) (P = .824). Median duration of stent patency was 165 days (normal group) and 226 days (radioactive group) (P < .001). During follow-up, all patients died from tumor progression, with respective median survival of 198 days (normal group) and 256 days (radioactive group) (P < .001). Seven and 5 patients in the normal and radioactive groups suffered from stent-related complications (P = .730).Radioactive stenting is effective and safe for inoperable HCCA patient and may prolong stent patency and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Lin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo
| | - An-Le Wu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo
| | - Fei Teng
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo
| | - Yu-Tao Xian
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo
| | - Xin-Jian Xu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Jiangyin People's Hospital, Jiangyin, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Unilateral Stent Insertion With High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2021; 30:281-284. [PMID: 32168167 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and long-term outcomes of unilateral stent insertion with high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation (HIFUA) in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS From March 2016 to June 2019, consecutive patients presenting with HCCA were treated with single stent insertion or stent with HIFUA. The long-term outcomes of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS During the study period, 37 patients were included who underwent single stent insertion and 32 patients who underwent stent insertion with HIFUA. Eight (21.6%) patients in the single stent group and 6 (18.8%) in the combined group experienced stent dysfunction (P=0.767). Median stent patency in the single stent and combined groups was 169 and 225 days, respectively (P<0.001). All patients died because of tumor progression. The median poststent overall survival for patients in the single stent and combined groups were 178 and 246 days, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSION HIFUA after unilateral stent insertion can prolong stent patency and survival of patients with inoperable HCCA.
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhu BY, Chen DK, Yin HH, Xia FF, Han XQ. Irradiation stent insertion for distal biliary obstruction secondary to primary common biliary cancer. MINIM INVASIV THER 2021; 31:747-752. [PMID: 33719842 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2021.1893751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effectiveness and safety of irradiation stent insertion for patients with distal biliary obstruction (DBO) secondary to primary common biliary cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty-two consecutive patients with DBO secondary to primary common biliary cancer were treated via either normal (n = 45) or irradiation stenting (n = 37) between January 2013 and December 2019. The instant and long-term outcomes were compared. RESULTS Technical success rates of normal and irradiation stenting were both 100%. Clinical success rates of normal and irradiation stenting were 91.1 and 100%, respectively (p = .179). Stent reobstruction was observed in 13 and 7 patients in the normal and irradiation stenting groups, respectively (p = .295). The median stent patency was 162 and 225 days in the normal and irradiation stenting groups, respectively (p < .001). The median survival was 178 and 250 days in the normal and irradiation stenting groups, respectively (p < .001). Cholangitis was, respectively, observed in 8 and 12 patients in normal and irradiation stenting groups (p = .124). CONCLUSION Irradiation stenting is effective and safe for patients with DBO secondary to primary common biliary cancer and can prolong stent patency and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing-Yan Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Binzhou People's Hospital, Binzhou, China
| | - Dong-Kai Chen
- Department of Radiology, Binzhou People's Hospital, Binzhou, China
| | - Hong-Hua Yin
- Department of Obstetrics, Binzhou People's Hospital, Binzhou, China
| | - Feng-Fei Xia
- Department of Interventional Vascular Surgery, Binzhou People's Hospital, Binzhou, China
| | - Xin-Qiang Han
- Department of Interventional Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang FQ, Li L, Huang PC, Xia FF, Zhu L, Cao C. Stent Insertion With High Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Biliary Obstruction Caused by Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2021; 31:298-303. [PMID: 33605677 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was designed to assess the clinical efficacy of stent insertion with high intensity-focused ultrasound ablation (HIFUA) in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) as a consequence of pancreatic carcinoma (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a single-center, open-label, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Consecutive patients with MBO caused by PC were randomly assigned to undergo stent insertion with or without HIFUA from June 2019 to February 2020. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03962478). RESULTS In total, 92 patients were enrolled in this study and assigned to the stent-only (n=46) or combined (stent+HIFUA; n=46) treatment groups. Stent insertion was associated with a 100% technical success rate. For patients in the combination treatment group, 26, 18, and 2 patients underwent 2, 3, and 4 cycles of HIFUA, respectively. A positive clinical response to HIFUA treatment was noted in 38 patients (82.6%). Stent dysfunction was detected in 9 and 15 patients in the combination and stent-only groups, respectively (P=0.154), while median stent patency in these 2 groups was 188 and 120 days, respectively (P<0.001). All patients died over the course of the follow-up, with median survival periods of 218 and 140 days in the combination and stent-only treatment groups, respectively (P=0.001). The only detected predictor of prolonged survival was HIFUA treatment (P=0.004), and there were no significant differences in complication rates between these 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSION A combination of stent insertion and HIFUA can improve stent patency and overall survival in patients suffering from MBO because of PC relative to stent insertion alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lin Li
- Gynaecology and Obstetrics
| | - Ping-Chao Huang
- Interventional Vascular Surgery, Binzhou People's Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong Province
| | - Feng-Fei Xia
- Interventional Vascular Surgery, Binzhou People's Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong Province
| | - Lei Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Chi Cao
- Department of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fu YF, Xu YS, Shi YB, Zong RL, Cao C. Percutaneous metal stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of unilateral versus bilateral stenting. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:749-756. [PMID: 32671439 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02643-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Revised: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the relative clinical efficacy of treating malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) via percutaneous unilateral or bilateral metal stenting. Relevant articles up to December 2019 were identified within the Web of science, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Stent dysfunction served as the primary endpoint, while we assessed technical success, clinical success, early and late complication incidence, and overall survival as secondary outcomes. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous variables. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI were determined for overall survival. This meta-analysis included seven studies. Six studies were non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one study was a RCT. A total of 888 MHBO patients underwent either percutaneous unilateral (n = 376) or bilateral (n = 512) metal stenting in these seven studies. We detected no significant differences in stent dysfunction rates (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.67, 1.41, P = 0.89), technical success rates (OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.53, 2.29, P = 0.81), clinical success rates (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.43, 1.22, P = 0.22), early complication rates (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.34, 1.98, P = 0.66), late complication rates (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.29, 2.63, P = 0.81), or overall survival (HR: 0.99; 95% CI 0.83, 1.17, P = 0.88) between unilateral and bilateral groups. Funnel plots demonstrated no obvious publication bias of these primary and secondary endpoints. From a clinical perspective, percutaneous unilateral and bilateral metal stenting are similarly effective for treatment of patients with MHBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Fei Fu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Central Hospital, 199 South Jiefang Road, Xuzhou, China
| | - Yuan-Shun Xu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Central Hospital, 199 South Jiefang Road, Xuzhou, China
| | - Yi-Bing Shi
- Department of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Central Hospital, 199 South Jiefang Road, Xuzhou, China.
| | - Rui-Long Zong
- Department of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Central Hospital, 199 South Jiefang Road, Xuzhou, China
| | - Chi Cao
- Department of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Central Hospital, 199 South Jiefang Road, Xuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cai PF, Gu H, Zhu LJ, Xu YS, Deng HY. Stent insertion with high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for malignant biliary obstruction: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e23922. [PMID: 33545963 PMCID: PMC7837826 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000023922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis was conducted in order to understand the clinical efficacy of stent insertion with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). METHODS The Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all relevant studies published through July 2020. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan v5.3, with analyzed study endpoints including the rate of stent dysfunction, time to stent dysfunction, stent patency, complication rate, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS In total, 35 potentially relevant studies were initially identified, of which 6 were ultimately included in the present meta-analysis. These 6 studies included 429 MBO patients that were treated either only via stenting (n = 221) or via stenting in combination with HIFU ablation (n = 208). Pooled stent dysfunction rates in the stent and stent with HIFU groups were 25.9% and 18.0%, respectively (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 0.88, 2.84, P = .12). The average time to stent dysfunction was significantly longer in the stent with HIFU group relative to the stent group (MD: -3.15; 95% CI: -3.53, -2.77, P < .0001). Pooled complication rates in the stent and stent with HIFU groups were 17.1% and 19.6%, respectively (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.58, P = .67). Stent patency and OS were both significantly longer in the stent with HIFU group relative to the stent group (P < .0001 and.0001, respectively). Funnel plot analyses did not reveal any significant evidence of publication bias linked to the selected study endpoints. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis found that a combined stenting and HIFU ablation approach can achieve better stent patency and OS in MBO patients relative to stent insertion alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hong Gu
- Department of General Surgery
| | - Lei-Juan Zhu
- Department of Respiratory, The People's Hospital of Rugao, Rugao
| | - Yuan-Shun Xu
- Department of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou
| | - Hong-Yan Deng
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Radioactive Stent Insertion for Inoperable Malignant Common Biliary Obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 31:61-65. [DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
10
|
Yang SY, Liu F, Liu Y, Xia FF, Fu YF. Stent insertion with high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for distal biliary obstruction secondary to pancreatic carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e19099. [PMID: 32028435 PMCID: PMC7015571 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000019099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
We determined the clinical effectiveness and long-term outcomes in patients with distal biliary obstruction (DBO) secondary to pancreatic carcinoma (PC) who were treated by self-expanded metallic stent (SEMS) insertion with or without high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation.From January 2014 to December 2018, consecutive patients with DBO secondary to PC underwent SEMS insertion with or without HIFU ablation in our center. The long-term outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.During the included period, 75 patients underwent SEMS insertion with (n = 34) or without (n = 41) HIFU ablation in our center. SEMS insertion was successfully performed in all patients. Liver function was significantly improved after SEMS insertion in both groups. An average of 2.9 HIFU treatment sessions per patient were performed. Twenty patients (stent + HIFU group: 7; stent-only group: 13) experienced stent dysfunction (P = .278). The clinical response rate to HIFU ablation was 79.4%. The median stent patency was significantly longer in the stent with HIFU group than in the stent-only group (175 vs 118 days, P = .005). The median survival was significantly longer in the stent with HIFU group compared with the stent-only group (211 versus 136 days, P = .004). An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 3 (hazard ratio: 0.300; P = .002) and subsequent HIFU ablation (hazard ratio: 0.508; P = .005) were associated with prolonged survival.HIFU ablation following stent insertion can prolong the stent patency and survival for patients with DBO secondary to PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Ying Yang
- Department of gynaecology and obstetrics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan
| | - Fen Liu
- Department of gynaecology and obstetrics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan
| | | | - Feng-Fei Xia
- Department of Interventional Vascular Surgery, Binzhou People's Hospital, Binzhou
| | - Yu-Fei Fu
- Department of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Percutaneous stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a randomized controlled trial of unilateral versus bilateral stenting. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:2900-2908. [PMID: 30968181 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02010-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the clinical outcomes between unilateral and bilateral metal stenting for patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHO). METHODS This is a single-center, open-label, prospective, randomized study. Between January 2016 and March 2018, patients with MHO who were treated by percutaneous unilateral or bilateral metal stenting were enrolled. The primary endpoint was stent dysfunction. The secondary endpoints included technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and death. The protocol is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02649712). RESULTS A total of 72 patients were randomly grouped for the unilateral (n = 36) or bilateral (n = 36) stenting. The bilateral stenting was performed through the side-by-side technique. While technically, the rates of success of unilateral and bilateral stenting were 83.3% (30/36) in both the cases (P = 1.000), the clinical rates of success in unilateral and bilateral stenting were 90.0% (27/30) and 96.7% (29/30), respectively (P = 0.605). Based on the per-protocol analysis, stent dysfunction was found in 5 and 3 patients in unilateral and bilateral groups, respectively (16.7% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.704). No predictor was observed to influence stent dysfunction. The median cumulative survival in the unilateral group was 122 days and in the bilateral group was 125 days (P = 0.844). We also observed higher levels of post-operative total bilirubin and pre-operative alanine aminotransferase, and the absence of post-operative anticancer treatment as predictors of worse survival. CONCLUSION When compared, the bilateral and unilateral stentings provide a similar clinical effectiveness in patients with MHO.
Collapse
|
12
|
Comparison of Unilateral With Bilateral Metal Stenting for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2019; 29:43-48. [PMID: 30418421 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The main purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness between unilateral and bilateral metal stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). METHODS From January 2012 to October 2017, consecutive patients with MHBO underwent unilateral or bilateral stent insertion at our center. Technical and clinical success, stent patency, and survival were compared between these 2 groups. RESULTS A total of 110 patients with MHBO were included in this study. Technical successful rates of unilateral and bilateral stenting were 93.1% (54/58) and 90.4% (47/52), respectively (P=0.864). Clinical successful rates of unilateral and bilateral stenting were 96.4% (53/55) and 97.9% (46/47), respectively (P=1.000). There was no significant difference in stent patency period (unilateral, 182 d; bilateral, 198 d; P=0.999) and survival (unilateral, 189 d; bilateral, 199 d; P=0.867) between 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Unilateral and bilateral metal stenting had similar clinical effectiveness and long-term outcomes in patients with MHBO.
Collapse
|
13
|
Chang G, Xia FF, Li HF, Niu S, Xu YS. Unilateral versus bilateral stent insertion for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:2745-2751. [PMID: 28477177 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1174-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the clinical efficiency and long-term outcomes between unilateral and bilateral stent insertion in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction. METHODS From August 2012 to February 2016, 63 consecutive patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction were treated with unilateral or bilateral stent insertion at our center. The bilateral stents were inserted using the side-by-side technique. The clinical efficiency and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Unilateral and bilateral stent insertions were successfully performed in 31 of 33 and 27 of 30 patients, respectively (P = 0.912). No procedure-related complication occurred. Clinical success was achieved in 29 of 31 patients in the unilateral stent group and in 26 of 27 patients in the bilateral stent group (P = 0.637). During the follow-up, re-obstruction of stent occurred in five patients in the unilateral stent group and in three patients in the bilateral stent group (P = 0.58). The significant differences were not observed in the stent patency time (368 vs. 387 days, P = 0.685) and survival (200 vs. 198 days, P = 0.751) between two groups. Based on the univariate and multivariate analyses, the independent risk factors for decreasing the survival time included higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (P = 0.018), higher alanine aminotransferase level (P = 0.009), and absence of anticancer treatment after stent insertion (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION Compared to bilateral stent insertion for malignant hilar biliary obstruction, unilateral stent insertion can provide comparable clinical efficiency and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gang Chang
- Department of Interventional Vascular Surgery, Binzhou People's Hospital, 7 Huang-he Road, Binzhou, 256600, China
| | - Feng-Fei Xia
- Department of Interventional Vascular Surgery, Binzhou People's Hospital, 7 Huang-he Road, Binzhou, 256600, China
| | - Hong-Fu Li
- Department of Interventional Vascular Surgery, Binzhou People's Hospital, 7 Huang-he Road, Binzhou, 256600, China
| | - Su Niu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, 199 South Jie-fang Road, Xuzhou, 221009, China
| | - Yuan-Shun Xu
- Department of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, 199 South Jie-fang Road, Xuzhou, 221009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stent insertion for malignant superior vena cava syndrome: effectiveness and long-term outcome. Radiol Med 2017; 122:633-638. [PMID: 28429206 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-017-0767-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the clinical effectiveness and long-term outcome of stent insertion for malignant superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS From June 2010 to April 2016, 47 patients with malignant SVC syndrome were treated with stent insertion in our center. Data regarding the technical success, clinical success, and long-term outcome were collected and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS SVC stent insertion was successfully performed in all patients. A total of 65 stents were used. No procedure-related complication occurred in these patients. The mean SVC pressure gradient decreased from 17.8 mmHg before stent insertion to 7.6 mmHg after stent insertion (P < 0.001). Clinical success was 100%. During a mean follow-up period of 6 months (range 10 days-13 months), 25 patients underwent subsequent anti-cancer treatment. Six patients (12.8%) experienced re-obstruction of stent 1 to 189 days (median 76 days) after stent insertion. All patients died during the follow-up. The median stent patency time and survival were 339 and 167 days, respectively. The cumulative 3-, 6-, and 12-month stent patency rates were 93.4, 87.4, and 81.2%, respectively. The cumulative 3-, 6-, and 12-month survival rates were 83, 38.3, and 2.1%, respectively. The independent predictors of prolonging survival after stent insertion were lower tumor stage (P = 0.018) and subsequent anti-cancer treatment after stent insertion (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION Stent insertion is a simple, safe, and effective method for patients with malignant SVC syndrome. Subsequent anti-cancer treatment after stent insertion may increase the survival.
Collapse
|