Optimising patient fitness: strategies to reduce the effects of cancer cachexia in patients with advanced lung cancer

Exercise in cancer care for people with lung cancer: A narrative synthesis

OBJECTIVES

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed worldwide, resulting in significant physical and psychological consequences. In this narrative review, we explore the role of exercise as an adjunct therapy to counteract health issues experienced by people before, during and after treatment for lung cancer, and offer recommendations for exercise prescription and future research.

DESIGN

Narrative cornerstone review.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted to explore the role of exercise in cancer care for people diagnosed with lung cancer.

RESULTS

Improvements in fitness, strength and quality of life have been demonstrated in people with lung cancer following participation in exercise programmes before, during and post treatment. Whilst combined aerobic (50-100 % heart rate maximum) and resistance (50-85 % of 1 repetition maximum) training, 2-5 times per week across the cancer continuum is typically prescribed, few people with lung cancer currently access exercise services. 'Optimal' exercise prescription is unclear, although is likely individual-specific. The immediate priority is to identify a tolerable starting exercise dosage, with the side effects of lung cancer and its treatment on the respiratory system, particularly shortness of breath (dyspnoea), likely driving the initial maximum threshold for session mode, duration and intensity. To date, exercise safety for people with lung cancer has been poorly evaluated and reported - few trials report it, but those that do report small numbers of serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations for health professionals prescribing exercise therapy to people with lung cancer are provided, with consideration of the strengths and limitations of the current evidence base.

Prognostic value of the Scottish Inflammatory prognostic Score in patients with NSCLC expressing PD-L1 ≥ 50 % progressing on first-line pembrolizumab

BACKGROUND

Most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy will experience progressive disease (PD). Only a minority will go on to receive subsequent systemic anticancer therapy for which outcomes are guarded. We investigated the prognostic significance of biomarkers of systemic inflammation following failure of first-line pembrolizumab for NSCLC to aid subsequent management decisions.

METHODS

Patients with radiological and/or clinical evidence of PD on first-line pembrolizumab for advanced NSCLC at a regional Scottish cancer centre were identified. Inflammatory biomarkers at the time of PD, including serum albumin, neutrophil count and the Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS; combing albumin and neutrophils), and clinicopathological factors, including age, sex, histology, PDL1 expression and time to PD were recorded. The relationship between these and post-progression overall survival (ppOS) were examined.

RESULTS

Data were available for 211 patients. Median ppOS was 2.1 months. Only SIPS was predictive of ppOS on multivariate analysis (HR2.54 (95 %CI 1.81-3.56) (<0.001)), stratifying ppOS from 0.8 months (SIPS2), to 1.8 months (SIPS1), to 8.1 months (SIPS0) (p < 0.001). Thirty (14 %) patients received second-line systemic anticancer therapy with median ppOS 8.7 months. These patients had lower levels of systemic inflammation, as defined by albumin (p < 0.001), neutrophil count (p = 0.002), and SIPS (p = 0.004)), than all other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SIPS, a simple biomarker of systemic inflammation, predicts ppOS after first-line pembrolizumab and may be useful alongside routine assessments of patient fitness to inform individualised discussions about subsequent treatment. We highlight poor outcomes in this patient group and a role for SIPS in signposting transition to best supportive care and early referral to palliative care. It may also help identify a small group of patients most likely to benefit from further lines of therapy.

Hypoalbuminaemia as a Prognostic Biomarker of First-Line Treatment Resistance in Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: Despite significant advances in systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many patients still fail to respond to treatment or develop treatment resistance. Albumin, a biomarker of systemic inflammation and malnutrition, predicts survival in many cancers. We evaluated the prognostic significance of albumin in patients receiving first-line targeted therapy or immunotherapy-based SACT for metastatic NSCLC.

Methods: All patients treated with first-line targeted therapy or immunotherapy-based SACT for metastatic NSCLC at a regional Scottish cancer centre were identified. Serum albumin at pre-treatment, after 12-weeks of treatment, and at the time of progressive disease were recorded. The relationship between albumin (≥ 35g/L v <35g/L) and overall survival (OS) was examined.

Results: Data were available for 389 patients of both targeted therapy cohort (n = 159) and immunotherapy-based therapy cohort (n = 230). Pre-treatment albumin was predictive of OS in each cohort at HR1.82 (95%CI 1.23–2.7) (p =0.003) and HR2.55 (95%CI 1.78–3.65) (p < 0.001), respectively. Pre-treatment albumin <35 g/L was associated with a significantly higher relative risk of death within 12 weeks in each cohort at RR9.58 (95%CI 2.20–41.72, p = 0.003) and RR3.60 (95%CI 1.74–6.57, p < 0.001), respectively. The 12-week albumin was predictive of OS in each cohort at HR1.88 (95%CI 1.86–4.46) (p < 0.001) and HR2.67 (95%CI 1.74–4.08) (p < 0.001), respectively. 46 out of 133 (35%) evaluable patients treated with targeted therapy and 43 out of 169 (25%) treated with immunotherapy-based therapy crossed over albumin prognostic groups between pre-treatment and 12-week. The prognostic value of 12-week albumin was independent of pre-treatment albumin status. A majority of patients had albumin <35g/L at the time of progressive disease when it was also predictive of survival following progressive disease at HR2.48 (95%CI 1.61–3.82) (p < 0.001) and HR2.87 (95%CI 1.91–4.31) (p < 0.001) respectively).

Conclusions: Albumin is a reliable prognostic factor in patients with metastatic NSCLC, predicting survival independent of the class of drug treatment at various time points during the patient journey. Tracking albumin concentrations during systemic therapy may indicate disease activity or treatment response over time.