The role of dietary counseling and nutrition support in head and neck cancer patients

Differential use of postoperative psychosocial and physical services among older adults with head and neck cancer

INTRODUCTION

Older adults undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery often have significant functional and mental health impairments. We examined use of postoperative physical, nutritional, and psychosocial services among a cohort of older adults with HNC comanaged by geriatricians and surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our sample consisted of older adults who were referred to the Geriatrics Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2015 and 2019 and took a geriatric assessment (GA) prior to undergoing HNC surgery. Physical, nutritional, and psychosocial service utilization was assessed. Physical services included a physical, occupational, or rehabilitation consult during the patient's stay. Nutritional services consisted of speech and swallow or nutritional consult. Psychosocial services consisted of psychiatry, psychology, or a social work consult. Relationships between each service use, geriatric deficits, demographic, and surgical characteristics were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Chi-square test.

RESULTS

In total, 157 patients were included, with median age of 80 and length of stay of six days. The most common GA impairments were major distress (61%), depression (59%), social activity limitation (SAL) (54%), and deficits in activities of daily living (ADL) (44%). Nutritional and physical services were used much more frequently than psychosocial services (80% and 85% vs 31%, respectively). Receipt of services was associated with longer median length of hospital stay, operation time, and greater deficits in ADLs. SAL was associated with physical and psychosocial consult and lower Timed Up and Go (TUG) score; instrumental ADL (iADL) deficits were associated with physical services; and depression and distress were associated with psychosocial services.

DISCUSSION

The burden of psychosocial deficits is high among older adults with HNC. Future work is needed to understand the limited utilization of psychosocial services in this population as well as whether referral to psychosocial services can reduce the burden of these deficits.

Nutritional Management of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer-A Comprehensive Review

While surgical therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) is showing improvement with the advancement of reconstruction techniques, the focus in these patients should also be shifting to supportive pre and aftercare. Due to the highly sensitive and anatomically complex region, these patients tend to exhibit malnutrition, which has a substantial impact on their recovery and quality of life. The complications and symptoms of both the disease and the therapy usually make these patients unable to orally intake food, hence, a strategy should be prepared for their nutritional management. Even though there are several possible nutritional modalities that can be administrated, these patients commonly have a functional gastrointestinal tract, and enteral nutrition is indicated over the parenteral option. However, after extensive research of the available literature, it seems that there is a limited number of studies that focus on this important issue. Furthermore, there are no recommendations or guidelines regarding the nutritional management of HNC patients, pre- or post-operatively. Henceforth, this narrative review summarizes the nutritional challenges and management modalities in this particular group of patients. Nonetheless, this issue should be addressed in future studies and an algorithm should be established for better nutritional care of these patients.

Malnutrition, Cancer Stage and Gastrostomy Timing as Markers of Poor Outcomes in Gastrostomy-Fed Head and Neck Cancer Patients

For percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)-fed head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, risk markers of poor outcomes may identify those needing more intensive support. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate markers of poor outcomes using TNM-defined stages, initial anthropometry [body mass index (BMI), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), tricipital skinfold (TSF), mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC)] and laboratory data (albumin, transferrin, cholesterol), with 138 patients, 42-94 years old, enrolled. The patients had cancer, most frequently in the larynx (n = 52), predominantly stage IV (n = 109). Stage IVc presented a four times greater death risk than stage I (OR 3.998). Most patients presented low parameters: low BMI (n = 76), MUAC (n = 114), TSF (n = 58), MAMC (n = 81), albumin (n = 47), transferrin (n = 93), and cholesterol (n = 53). In stages I, III, IVa, and IVb, MAMC and PEG-timing were major survival determinants. Each MAMC unit increase resulted in 16% death risk decrease. Additional 10 PEG-feeding days resulted in 1% mortality decrease. Comparing IVa/IVb vs. IVc, albumin and transferrin presented significant differences (p = 0.042; p = 0.008). All parameters decreased as severity of stages increased. HNC patients were malnourished before PEG, with advanced cancer stages, and poor outcomes. Initial MAMC, reflecting lean tissue, significantly increases survival time, highlighting the importance of preserving muscle mass. PEG duration correlated positively with increased survival, lowering death risk by 1% for every additional 10 PEG-feeding days, signaling the need for early gastrostomy.

A National Evaluation of Food Insecurity in a Head and Neck Cancer Population

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To determine the food security status of patients with a history of head and neck cancer and compare to other types of cancer.

STUDY DEIGN

A retrospective analysis using the National Health Interview Series.

METHODS

The National Health Interview Series (NHIS) for the calendar years 2014 to 18 was used to elicit food security status (secure, marginally secure/not secure) among adult patients with a history of throat/pharynx head and neck cancer (pHNC), thyroid cancer, and colon cancer. The relationship between food security and the primary site was compared and subanalyses were performed according to sex, race, and ethnicity.

RESULTS

The study population included 199.0 thousand patients with pHNC, with 17.7% (95% confidence interval, 10.5%-28.1%) of pHNC patients reporting their food security status as marginally secure or not secure. Food insecurity was significantly higher among pHNC patients when compared to thyroid cancer (insecurity 10.7%, [7.7%-14.7%]) and colon cancer patients (10.1%, [7.8%-13.2%]). Among pHNC patients, there was no significant difference in rates of food insecurity when stratified by gender, race, or ethnicity. However, black individuals were more likely to have food insecurity with a history of thyroid or colon cancer (P < .042) and Hispanics were more likely to have food insecurity with a history of thyroid cancer (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Food insecurity disproportionally affects patients with a history of pHNC, though there is less demographic variability when compared to other cancer primary sites. Food security assessments should be part of the tailored approach to survivorship management in head and neck cancer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1539-E1542, 2021.

Systematic nutrition management for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing radiotherapy

Objective

To evaluate the impact of systematic nutrition management (SNM) on nutritional status, treatment-related toxicity, quality of life (QoL), response rates, and survival in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) treated by radiotherapy (RT).

Methods

In this retrospective study, 56 patients with LA-NPC were selected as nutrition management group (NG) for SNM during RT till 1 month later. Another 56 patients with LA-NPC receiving RT without SNM as control group (CG) were identified from the hospital database and matched pairs with NG patients according to age, gender, stage, and body mass index (BMI) prior to RT.

Results

At 1 month after RT, the percentage of malnourished patients with BMI <18.5 kg/m² was statistically significant reduced in NG as compared to the CG group (35.7% vs 58.9%, P=0.014). Nutritional indexes of body weight, hemoglobin, prealbumin, and lymphocyte in the NG were statistically significant higher than those in the CG group (P<0.05). NG patients had statistically significant less grade 3–4 oral mucositis during RT compared with the CG group (32.1% vs 51.8%, P=0.035). Furthermore, at 1 month after RT, an improved QoL was observed in NG patients with respect to physical, role and social functions, symptom scales of fatigue and pain, and the global health status as compared to the CG group (P<0.05). With a median follow-up of 24.8 months, there were no statistical differences between NG and CG (P>0.05) for the 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival (84.2% versus 79.5% and 94.7% versus 92.3%, respectively.).

Conclusion

SNM for LA-NPC patients treated by RT resulted in better nutritional status, reduced treatment-related toxicity and improved QoL.

The effect of time between diagnosis and initiation of treatment on outcomes in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the effect that time to initiation of treatment after diagnosis has on the outcomes of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

This is a single institution retrospective analysis of 633 HNSCC patients treated from 2004 to 2017. Clinical information was abstracted from the medical records. Patients were divided into quartiles based on the time to treatment initiation (0-27 days, 28-41 days, 42-60 days, and >60 days). Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) curves and multivariate cox proportional hazard ratios were determined for time to treatment quartiles.

RESULTS

Differences in Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS based on treatment time quartiles were statistically significantly (p = 0.02), and multivariate Cox Proportional hazard ratios for OS revealed that patients in the 42-60 day treatment time group had better OS (hazard ratio = 0.55) compared to patients treated >days after diagnosis (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

For our study population, increased time to initiation of treatment did not impact overall survival. These results may help to alleviate patient anxiety while allowing time for useful interventions such as smoking cessation, nutritional counseling, and others that can affect clinical outcomes.

The impact of dietary regimen compliance on outcomes for HNSCC patients treated with radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

To analyze nutritional factors and compliance with dietary recommendations for associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving definitive RT for laryngeal and oropharyngeal cancers.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We identified 352 patients with non-metastatic laryngeal (146) and oropharyngeal (206) cancer treated with definitive RT between 2004 and 2013. Disease and patient characteristics, treatment information, sarcopenia based on muscle areas at L3 level on CT, compliance with the nutritional program, and clinical outcomes data were tabulated. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and log rank tests were performed, and Cox regression models were used to examine predictors of OS and PFS.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 22.86 months. The actuarial rates for OS were 91, 86, and 73% at years 1, 2, and 5, respectively. Of patients with abdominal CT prior to starting RT, 70.9% (112/158) were sarcopenic with a median muscle mass index of 48.2 (range 30.4-70.9) for males and 35.9 (range 24.6-53.2) for females. The majority (85.8%) of patients met with a dietitian during their course of RT and 62.6% of these patients were compliant with the nutritional program. Compliance with the nutritional program resulted in 27% (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.43-1.26) protection from death (did not reach significance) and 31% (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.94) significant protection from disease progression. Higher pretreatment BMI was associated with a lower risk of death (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.99) and disease progression (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99).

CONCLUSION

Laryngeal and oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with definitive RT who are compliant with regular dietetic counseling and contact appear to have improved outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Nutrition Management for the Head and Neck Cancer Patient

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients often face multiple nutritional challenges before, during, and after treatment due to the close proximity of the cancer to organs that are vital for normal eating function. Common treatment-related side effects, such as dysphagia, odynophagia, dysgeusia, xerostomia, thick saliva, mucositis, nausea, and vomiting, all further impair the patient's ability to maintain adequate oral intake. Malnutrition and unintentional weight loss in HNC patients during and after treatment are associated with poorer treatment outcomes, increased morbidity and mortality, and poor quality of life, even in overweight and obese patients whose Body Mass Index (BMI) is not suggestive of malnutrition. The main nutrition goal for HNC patients is thus to maximize nutrition intake either orally or through nutrition support therapy in order to prevent or limit weight loss, preserve lean body mass, minimize treatment delays and unplanned hospitalizations, and improve treatment outcomes. This chapter will discuss nutrition interventions to manage common symptoms before, during, and after treatment for HNC. Guidelines will be provided for patients that require enteral nutrition or less commonly, parenteral nutrition.

Availability of Outpatient Clinical Nutrition Services for Patients With Cancer Undergoing Treatment at Comprehensive Cancer Centers

Comprehensive cancer centers rely on referral-based clinical nutrition services, which are not always a part of multidisciplinary care. An in-depth comparison of clinical nutrition services among other approaches to cancer care is needed.

A prospective analysis of factors that influence weight loss in patients undergoing radiotherapy

Malnutrition occurs frequently in patients with cancer. Indeed, a variety of nutritional and tumor-related factors must be taken into account in these patients. Recognizing this relationship, we aimed to prospectively evaluate the risk factors that influence weight loss in patients undergoing radiotherapy with oral nutritional supplementation and dietetic counseling. Weight loss of 74 patients during radiotherapy and 1 month after treatment was analyzed. Parameters such as age, gender, tumor location, tumor stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, and the use of chemotherapy were analyzed to evaluate their influence on weight loss. All patients underwent oral nutritional supplementation and dietetic counseling. Forty-six (65.7%) patients lost weight, with a mean weight loss of (4.73 ± 3.91) kg, during radiotherapy. At 1 month after treatment, 45 (66.2%) patients lost weight, presenting a mean weight loss of (4.96 ± 4.04) kg, corresponding to a (6.84 ± 5.24)% net reduction from their baseline weight. Head and neck cancer patients had a mean weight loss of (3.25 ± 5.30) kg, whereas the remaining patients had a mean weight loss of (0.64 ± 2.39) kg (P = 0.028) during radiotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, the head and neck tumor location (P = 0.005), use of chemotherapy (P = 0.011), and ECOG PS score of 2-3 (P = 0.026) were considered independent risk factors. Nutritional status and parameters, such as tumor location (especially the head and neck), the use of chemotherapy, and the ECOG PS score, should be evaluated before radiotherapy because these factors can influence weight loss during radiotherapy and 1 month after treatment.