A protocol for the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:13-19; discussion 19-21. [PMID: 25539198 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000491]

A systematic review of participant descriptors reported in studies of adhesive small bowel obstruction

AIM

Reporting of participant descriptors in studies of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) can help identify characteristics associated with favourable outcomes and allow comparison with other studies and real-world clinical populations. The aim was to identify the pattern of participant descriptors reported in studies assessing interventions for ASBO.

METHOD

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021281031) and reported in line with the PRISMA checklist. Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were undertaken to identify studies assessing operative and non-operative interventions for adults with ASBO. Studies were dual screened for inclusion. Descriptors were categorised into conceptual domains by the research team.

RESULTS

Searches identified 2648 studies, of which 73 were included. A total of 156 unique descriptors were identified. On average, studies reported 12 descriptors. The most frequently reported descriptors were sex, age, SBO aetiology, history of abdominal surgery, BMI and ASA classification. The highest number of descriptors in a single study was 34, compared to the lowest number of descriptors which was one. Pathway factors were the least frequently described domain. Overall, 37 descriptors were reported in just one study.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of consistency in participant descriptors reported in studies of SBO. Furthermore, a significant proportion of the descriptors were used infrequently. This makes it challenging to assess whether study participants are representative of the wider population. Further work is required to develop a Core Descriptor Set to standardise the reporting of patient characteristics and reduce heterogeneity between studies.

Pearls and Pitfalls of Imaging Small Bowel Obstruction

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common condition encountered by radiologists in the evaluation of patients with abdominal pain, and is an important diagnosis to be comfortable with given substantial associated morbidity and mortality. In this review, we summarize an imaging approach to evaluating patients with suspected SBO, discuss the role of certain imaging modalities such as radiography and small bowel follow through, CT, and MRI, as well as review some common and also less common causes of SBO such as internal hernia. We will also discuss tailoring the imaging approach to address specific clinical questions and special patient populations such as imaging the pregnant patient with suspected SBO, and the inflammatory bowel disease patient.

Small Bowel Obstruction in Virgin Abdomen: Predictors of Surgical Intervention Need in Resource-Limited Setting

Background

Limited evidence is available regarding the management of small bowel obstruction in the virgin abdomen (SBO-VA), with most studies excluding this entity. This study aims to assess the available data on the treatment outcomes and predictors of surgical intervention in SBO-VA.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between 2015 and 2021, including all diagnosed and managed cases of SBO-VA at Al-Nasar Hospital. Patients were divided according to the treatment approach into surgical or conservative groups. Preoperative laboratory and radiologic data were gathered and compared between groups.

Results

During the study period, 67 cases, primarily males (58.2%), with an average age of 52.2±14.4 years were assessed. Common comorbidities included diabetes (20.9%) and hypertension (16.4%). Key symptoms were rebound tenderness (82.1%) and abdominal tenderness (70.1%). The predominant etiology was adhesions (23.9%). About 46.2% received conservative treatment, 53.8% underwent urgent surgery. Conservative treatment failed in 9.4% of cases, and complications arose in 23.9%, with most being fever (17.9%). Factors necessitating surgical management included older age (58.8 ±11.7 vs 44.9 ±13.8 years, p<0.001), previous hospital admission (p<0.001), presence of abdominal tenderness (p=0.030), longer abdominal pain duration (4.0 ±0.9 vs 2.1 ±0.6 days, p<0.001), higher C- reactive protein (p= 0.033), higher white blood cell (p= 0.006), longer time to hospital presentation (75.3 ±17.2 vs 39.0 ±22.8 days, p= <0.001), small bowel thickness ≥3 cm (p=0.009), and reduced bowel enhancement (p <0.001) on computed tomography imaging. In surgical group, the need for ICU admission was higher and hospital stays were shorter than in conservative group and were statistically significant (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The main etiology of SBO-VA in our study was adhesions. Older age, previous hospital admission, longer abdominal pain duration, abdominal tenderness, increased inflammatory markers, and alarm signs on CT scans are the main factors for determining the need for urgent surgical exploration in patients with SBO-VA. To achieve prompt identification and intervention, it is crucial to maintain a high level of vigilance and awareness, even in individuals with no prior surgical history.

Survey of Diagnostic and Management Practices in Small Bowel Obstruction: Individual and Generational Variation Despite Practice Guidelines

Background: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common disorder managed by surgeons. Despite extensive publications and management guidelines, there is no universally accepted approach to its diagnosis and management. We conducted a survey of acute care surgeons to elucidate their SBO practice patterns.Methods: A self-report survey of SBO diagnosis and management practices was designed and distributed by email to AAST surgeons who cared for adult SBO patients. Responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Chi-square test of independence at α = .05.Results: There were 201 useable surveys: 53% ≥ 50 years, 77% male, 77% at level I trauma centers. Only 35.8% reported formal hospital SBO management guidelines. Computed tomography (CT) scan was the only diagnostic exam listed as "essential" by the majority of respondents (82.6%). Following NG decompression, 153 (76.1%) would "always/frequently" administer a water-soluble contrast challenge (GC). There were notable age differences in approach. Compared to those ≥50 years, younger surgeons were less likely to deem plain abdominal films as "essential" (16.0% vs 40.2%; P < .01) but more likely to require CT scan (88.3% vs 77.6%; P = .045) for diagnosis and to "always/frequently" administer GC (84.0% vs 69.2%; P < .01). Younger surgeons used laparoscopy "frequently" more often than older surgeons (34.0% vs 21.5%, P = .05).Discussion: There is significant variation in diagnosis and management of SBO among respondents in this convenience sample, despite existing PMGs. Novel age differences in responses were observed, which prompts further evaluation. Additional research is needed to determine whether variation in practice patterns is widespread and affects outcomes.

Implementation of a Gastrografin Order Set for Small Bowel Obstruction Across a Health System: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The use of Gastrografin (GG) in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) has been shown to decrease the length of stay and operative intervention.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study examined patients with an SBO diagnosis prior to implementation (PRE, January 2017-January 2019) and following implementation (POST, January 2019-May 2021) of a GG challenge order set made available across 9 hospitals within a health care system. Primary outcomes were utilization of the order set across facilities and over time. Secondary outcomes included time to surgery for operative patients, rate of surgery, nonoperative length of stay, and 30-day readmission. Standard descriptive, univariate, and multivariable regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

PRE cohort had 1746 patients and POST had 1889. The utilization of GG increased from 14% to 49.5% following implementation. Significant variability existed within the hospital system with utilization at each individual hospital from 11.5% to 60%. There was an increase in surgical intervention (13.9% vs 16.4%, P = .04) and decrease in nonoperative LOS (65.6 vs 59.9 hours, P < .001) following implementation. For POST patients, multivariable linear regression showed significant reduction in nonoperative length of stay (-23.1 hours, P < .001) but no significant difference in time to surgery (-19.6 hours, P = .08).

DISCUSSION

The availability of a standardized order set for SBO can result in increased Gastrografin administration across hospital settings. The implementation of a Gastrografin order set was associated with decreased length of stay in nonoperative patients.

Clinical Indicators to Determine the Timing of Surgery for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction

BACKGROUND

Decompression of the intestine with a long tube or nasogastric tube is the first-choice treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). Scheduling surgery while weighing the risks of surgery against conservative care is a crucial factor in clinical decision-making. Whenever feasible, unnecessary surgeries should be avoided, and it is essential to provide clinical markers for this. This study aimed to obtain evidence regarding the optimal timing of ASBO and when conservative treatment options are not successful.

METHODS

The data of patients diagnosed with ASBO and receiving long tube insertion for more than 7 days were reviewed. We investigated transit ileal drainage volume and recurrence. The primary outcomes were the change in the drainage volume from the long tube over time and the percentage of patients who required surgery. We evaluated some cutoff values to determine the indication for surgery based on the insertion duration and volume of long tube drainage.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-one patients showed improvement with conservative treatment, whereas 48 ultimately required surgery. When a daily drainage volume of ≥500 mL was considered an indication for surgery, 13-37 cases (25%-72%) would be judged unnecessary within 6 days of long tube insertion, while 5 cases (9.8%) would be judged unnecessary on day 7.

DISCUSSION

Unnecessary surgical interventions for ASBO might be avoided by assessing the drainage volume on day 7 after inserting a long tube.

A new clinical severity score for the management of acute small bowel obstruction in predicting bowel ischemia: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common hospital admission diagnosis. Identification of patients who will require a surgical resection because of a nonviable small bowel remains a challenge. Through a prospective cohort study, the authors aimed to validate risk factors and scores for intestinal resection, and to develop a practical clinical score designed to guide surgical versus conservative management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients admitted for an acute SBO between 2004 and 2016 in the center were included. Patients were divided in three categories depending on the management: conservative, surgical with bowel resection, and surgical without bowel resection. The outcome variable was small bowel necrosis. Logistic regression models were used to identify the best predictors.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirteen patients were included in this study, 492 in the development cohort and 221 in the validation cohort. Sixty-seven percent had surgery, of which 21% had small bowel resection. Thirty-three percent were treated conservatively. Eight variables were identified with a strong association with small bowel resection: age 70 years of age and above, first episode of SBO, no bowel movement for greater than or equal to 3 days, abdominal guarding, C-reactive protein greater than or equal to 50, and three abdominal computer tomography scanner signs: small bowel transition point, lack of small bowel contrast enhancement, and the presence of greater than 500 ml of intra-abdominal fluid. Sensitivity and specificity of this score were 65 and 88%, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.89).

CONCLUSION

The authors developed and validated a practical clinical severity score designed to tailor management of patients presenting with an SBO.

Contrast Challenge Algorithms for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstructions Are Safe in Children: A Multi-Institutional Study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of a water-soluble contrast challenge as part of a nonoperative management algorithm in children with an adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO).

BACKGROUND

Predicting which children will successfully resolve their ASBO with non-operative management at the time of admission remains difficult. Additionally, the safety of a water-soluble contrast challenge for children with ASBO has not been established in the literature.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent non-operative management for an ASBO and received a contrast challenge across 5 children's hospitals between 2012 and 2020. Safety was assessed by comparing the complication rate associated with a contrast challenge against a pre-specified maximum acceptable level of 5%. Sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values of a contrast challenge to identify successful nonoperative management were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 82 children who received a contrast challenge, 65% were successfully managed nonoperatively. The most common surgical indications were failure of the contrast challenge or failure to progress after initially passing the contrast challenge. There were no complications related to contrast administration (0%; 95% confidence interval: 0-3.6%, P = 0.03). The contrast challenge was highly reliable in determining which patients would require surgery and which could be successfully managed non-operatively (sensitivity 100%, specificity 86%, NPV 100%, PPV 93%).

CONCLUSION

A contrast challenge is safe in children with ASBO and has a high predictive value to assist in clinical decision-making.

Current Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstructions in Children

Adhesive small bowel obstructions are a common cause of morbidity in children who underwent prior abdominal surgery. The concept of partial versus complete bowel obstruction is outdated and lacks precision to be clinically useful. Identifying patients with indications for immediate operative intervention is critical and must be recognized to limit morbidity. Clinical protocols and contrast challenge algorithms have attempted to identify patients that will resolve their bowel obstruction nonoperatively; there has been slow uptake in the pediatric patient population versus adults until recently. Incorporating predictive models and standardized contrast challenge protocols will help reduce interpractitioner variability and improve clinical outcomes.

Surgical treatment of mechanical bowel obstruction: characteristics and outcomes of geriatric patients compared to a younger cohort

PURPOSE

Mechanical bowel obstruction (MBO) is one of the most common indications for emergency surgery. Recent research justifies the method of attempting 3-5 days of nonoperative treatment before surgery. However, little is known about specific characteristics of geriatric patients undergoing surgery compared to a younger cohort. We aimed to analyze patients with MBO that required surgery, depending on their age, to identify potential targets for use in the reduction in complications and mortality in the elderly.

METHODS

Thirty-day and in-hospital mortality were determined as primary outcome. We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent surgery for MBO at the University Hospital of Bonn between 2009 and 2019 and divided them into non-geriatric (40-74 years, n = 224) and geriatric (≥ 75 years, n = 88) patients, using the chi-squared-test and Mann-Whitney U test for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We found that geriatric patients had higher 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates than non-geriatric patients. As secondary outcome, we found that they experienced a longer length of stay (LOS) and higher complication rates than non-geriatric patients. Geriatric patients who suffered from large bowel obstruction (LBO) had a higher rate of bowel resection, stoma creation, and a higher 30-day mortality rate. The time from admission to surgery was not shown to be crucial for the outcome of (geriatric) patients.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric patients suffering from mechanical bowel obstruction that had to undergo surgery had higher mortality and morbidity than non-geriatric patients. Especially in regard to geriatric patients, clinicians should treat patients in a risk-adapted rather than time-adapted manner, and conditions should be optimized before surgery.

Surgical management and outcomes of adhesive small bowel obstruction: teaching versus non-teaching hospitals

BACKGROUND

The relationship between surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) and hospital teaching status is not well known. We sought to elucidate the association between hospital teaching status and clinical metrics for ASBO.

METHODS

Using the 2007-2017 California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database, we identified adult ASBO patients hospitalized for surgical intervention. Hospital teaching status was categorized as major teaching (MajT), minor teaching (MinT), and non-teaching (NT). Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate risk of death and other adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 25,047 admissions, 15.4% were at MajT, 32.0% at MinT, and 52.6% at NT; 2.9% died. Patients at MajT had longer overall hospital stays (HLOS) than those at MinT or NT (median days 9 vs. 8 vs. 8; p = 0.005), longer post-ASBO procedure HLOS (median days 7 vs. 6 vs. 6; p = 0.0001) and higher rates of small bowel resection (27.1% vs. 21.7% vs. 21.7%; p < 0.0001). Mean time to first surgery at MajT was 3.3 days compared with 2.6 days (p = 0.004) at MinT and NT. Compared with patients at NT, those at MajT were significantly less likely to die (HR 0.62, p < 0.0001), develop pneumonia (HR 0.57, p = 0.001), or experience adverse discharge disposition (HR 0.79, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Mortality and morbidity of ASBO surgery were reduced at MajT; however, time to surgery, HLOS, and rate of small bowel resection were greater. These findings may guide improvements in the management of ASBO patients.

Jejunal closed-loop obstruction without prior abdominal surgery during COVID-19 ICU admittance: A case report

Introduction

and importance: Closed-loop obstruction is a specific case of small bowel obstruction in which two sites of the bowel obstruct at one adjacent location. This can result in strangulation with high mortality. This condition is most often observed after abdominal surgery. The exact underlying pathology in patients without prior abdominal surgery is still largely unclear, and only scarce literature on the role of COVID-19 or long-term prone position is available.

Case presentation

A 74-year-old male patient without prior abdominal surgery was presented to the emergency department with pulmonary and gastro-intestinal symptoms of COVID-19. The patient was known to have diverticulosis of colon and sigmoid. After a complicated ICU course, the patient developed a jejunal closed loop obstruction, and a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. Fixation of the omentum to the retroperitoneum was released, without observation of further adhesions, bowel torsion or ischemic bowel. Further abdominal course was uncomplicated, however, unfortunately the patient died following pulmonary deterioration.

Clinical discussion

The differential diagnosis of small bowel obstruction is extensive; however, adhesions are most often observed. In patients without prior surgery, also adhesions are observed, mainly caused by earlier infections. There might be a role for abdominal COVID-19 infection and prolonged prone position in the emergence of adhesions; however, literature is lacking. Alternatively, asymptomatic diverticulitis might have led to adhesion formation.

Conclusion

Closed loop obstructions in patients without prior abdominal surgery are uncommon and post-infectious abdominal status might cause adhesions. It is unclear whether abdominal manifestations of COVID-19 and prolonged prone position can also cause adhesions and, thereby, small bowel obstructions.

•

Small bowel closed loop obstructions are uncommon in patients without prior abdominal surgery.

•

Small bowel obstructions in patients without prior abdominal surgery might arise following abdominal infections.

•

Abdominal COVID-19 infection can be the cause of small bowel obstruction.

•

Closed loop obstruction results in strangulation in 10% of the cases with a mortality of 10–35%.

•

In patients with closed-loop obstruction, there should be a low threshold for a diagnostic laparoscopy.

Attitudes Affecting Decision-making for Use of Radiologic Enteral Contrast in the Management of Pediatric Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Survey Study of Pediatric Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Pediatric surgeons are often asked to treat clinical problems for which little high-quality data exist. For adults with adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO), water soluble contrast-based protocols are used to guide management. Little is known about their utility in children. We aimed to better understand key factors in clinical decision-making processes and integration of adult based data in pediatric surgeon's approach to ASBO.

METHODS

We administered a web-based survey to practicing pediatric surgeons at institutions comprising the Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium.

RESULTS

The response rate was 69% (78/113). Over half of respondents reported using contrast protocols to guide ASBO management either routinely or occasionally (n = 47, 60%). Common themes regarding the incorporation of adult-based data into clinical practice included the need to adapt protocols for pediatric patients, the dearth of pediatric specific data, and the quality of the published adult evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that pediatric surgeons use contrast-based protocols for the management of ASBO despite the paucity of pediatric specific data. Furthermore, our survey data help us understand how pediatric surgeons incorporate adult based evidence into their practice.

Computed Tomography in Emergency Diagnosis and Management Considerations of Small Bowel Obstruction for Surgical vs. Non-surgical Approach

BACKGROUND

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) accounts for 15% of abdominal pain complaints referred to emergency departments and imposes significant financial burdens on the healthcare system. The absence of passage of flatus or stool and abdominal distention are reported as the most common symptom and a sign of SBO, respectively. Patients who do not demonstrate severe clinical or imaging findings are typically treated with conservative approaches. Patients with clinical signs of sepsis or physical findings of peritonitis are often instantly transferred to the operating room without supplementary imaging assessment. However, in cases where symptoms are non-specific, or the physical examination is challenging, such as in cases with loss of consciousness, the diagnosis can be complicated. This paper discusses the key findings detectable on Computed tomography (CT), which are vital for the emergent triage, proper treatment, and decision making in patients with speculated SBO.

METHOD

Narrative review of the literature.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

CT plays a key role in emergent triage, proper treatment, and decision making. It provides high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the detection of early-stage obstruction and acute intestinal vascular compromise. It can also differentiate between various etiologies of this entity which is considered an important criterion in the triage of patients into surgical vs. non-surgical treatment. There are multiple CT findings, such as mesenteric edema, lack of the small-bowel feces, bowel wall thickening, fat stranding in the mesentery, and intraperitoneal fluid, which are predictive of urgent surgical exploration.

Small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic gastrectomy: An atypical clinical presentation. Report of a case

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative adhesions represent the most common cause of acute small bowel obstruction (80%) and are usually a consequence of abdomino-pelvic surgery performed with open technique.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 45-year-old black man arrived at the emergency room with abdominal pain and distension three months after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis performed for benign pyloric stenosis. CT abdominal scan revealed some air-fluid levels in the center of the abdomen with distension of proximal jejunal loops caused by intestinal adhesions. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was performed to restore the intestinal transit.

DISCUSSION

The formation of adhesions is more frequent after abdomino-pelvic surgery. CT abdominal scan is very useful tool to identify the level and the aetiology of obstruction and it may predict the need for surgery, the location of different adhesive bands in order to identify wich patients are likely candidates for laparoscopic treatment.

CONCLUSION

In selected cases, laparoscopic approach for small bowel obstruction is a good surgical option. In patients with adbominal dense adhesions or clinical signs of intestinal ischemia, conversion to laparotomy should be considered an alternative.

Optimal Timing of First Abdominal Radiography after Gastrografin Administration for Small Bowel Obstruction

BACKGROUND

Water-soluble contrast agent (WSCA) administration is commonly used to evaluate adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) either via a challenge or follow-through study. This analysis aimed to determine optimal timing to first abdominal radiograph after WSCA administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A post hoc review of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma SBO database was used to compare data from two institutions using different methodologies, either the small bowel follow through method or the challenge method, from March 2015-January 2018. The primary outcome was timing of contrast into the colon. Outcomes were also analyzed. A multivariate regression analysis controlled for age, sex, body mass index, previous SBO admissions, and abdominal surgeries.

RESULTS

A total of 236 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria (A, 119; B, 117). There were minor demographic differences between cohorts and no significant differences between institutions regarding the confirmed presence of WSCA in the colon, rates of operative intervention, length of operation, hospital length of stay, or 30-d readmission rates.Institution A, where the challenge method was practiced, had 95 (80%) patients with contrast to colon overall; four of 95 (4%) patients had confirmed contrast to colon at or before 7 h, and 89 of 95 (94%) patients had confirmed contrast to colon between 7.1 and 10 h. Institution B, where the small bowel follow through method was practiced, had 94 (80%) patients with contrast to colon overall; 73 of 94 (78%) patients had confirmed contrast to colon at or before 7 h, and 15 of 94 (16%) patients had confirmed contrast to colon between 7.1 and 10 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Either method is effective for evaluation of SBO. Adding a radiograph at 4 h is feasible, could promote earlier disposition, be conducted as part of an emergency department protocol, and possibly allow for the selection of patients who are candidates for outpatient treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Small-Bowel Obstruction

Small-bowel obstruction is a common cause of abdominal pain and accounts for a significant proportion of hospital admissions. Radiologic imaging plays the key role in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel obstruction as neither patient presentation, the clinical examination, nor laboratory testing are sufficiently sensitive or specific enough to diagnose or guide management. This document focuses on the imaging evaluation of the two most commonly encountered clinical scenarios related to small-bowel obstruction: the acute presentation and the more indolent, low-grade, or intermittent presentation. This document hopes to clarify the appropriate utilization of the many imaging procedures that are available and commonly employed in these clinical settings. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Variations in use of "water soluble contrast challenge" for small bowel obstruction among academic radiologists: results of a national survey

OBJECTIVE

To assess the frequency and indications for use of oral water-soluble contrast challenge as a diagnostic test for small bowel obstruction in four regions of the USA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We distributed a 9-question web-based survey to the abdominal section heads of academic radiology departments throughout the USA (N = 97). The questions pertained to use of water-soluble contrast for management of small bowel obstruction. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 46%. Eighty percent of the responding hospitals had more than 500 beds in operation. Water-soluble contrast challenge was considered standard of care for management of non-operative small bowel obstruction in 60% of the responding radiology departments. The majority of the responding departments (41%) performed 2-8 contrast challenge studies per month on average. The most frequent indication for the study was distinguishing partial vs complete bowel obstruction. Eighty percent of the responding radiologists believed that the contrast challenge is useful for management of small bowel obstruction. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in frequency and indication for use of water-soluble contrast challenge based on geographic location.

CONCLUSION

The water-soluble contrast challenge was considered standard of care for non-operative management of small bowel obstruction in majority of the academic radiology departments represented in this survey. Surgeons were referring clinicians in every case. The most common clinical indication for the study was distinguishing partial versus complete small bowel obstruction.

Outcomes in adhesive small bowel obstruction from a large statewide database: What to expect after nonoperative management

BACKGROUND

Although adhesive small-bowel obstruction (ASBO) is frequently managed nonoperatively, little is known regarding outcomes on readmission following this approach. Using a large population-based dataset, we evaluated risk factors for operative intervention and mortality at readmission in patients with ASBO who were initially managed nonoperatively.

METHODS

The ASBO patients were identified in the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development 2007 to 2014 patient discharge database. Patients who were managed operatively at index admission or had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code for nonadhesive obstructive small bowel disease were excluded. Associations between risk factors and both operative intervention and death following readmission were evaluated using survival analysis.

RESULTS

Among 15,963 ASBO patients, 3,103 (19.4%) had at least one readmission. The 1,069 (34.5%) who received an operation during their first readmission presented sooner (175 days vs. 316 days, p < 0.001) and were more likely to die during that readmission (5.2% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001). Operative management at first readmission was associated with younger age, fewer comorbidities, and shorter times to readmission. Patients operatively managed at first readmission had longer times to second readmission compared with nonoperative patients. Stratified analyses using nonoperative patients as the reference over the study period revealed that patients who underwent lysis of adhesions and bowel resection were 5.04 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.82-9.00) as likely to die while those who underwent lysis only were 2.09 times (95% CI, 1.14-3.85) as likely to die. Patients with bowel resection only were at an increased risk for subsequent interventions beyond the first readmission (hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.11-2.87).

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort readmitted for ASBO and initially managed nonoperatively, subsequent operative intervention conferred a greater risk of death and a longer time to readmission among survivors. Prospective research is needed to further delineate outcomes associated with initial nonoperative management of ASBO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiological, level III.

Small bowel obstruction and the gastrografin challenge

The "gastrografin challenge" has been used for decades in the evaluation of small bowel obstruction (SBO). This type of study involves enteric administration of a water-soluble contrast followed by serial abdominal radiographs. While its diagnostic role is well established, its therapeutic role remains controversial. Following an algorithm for gastrografin challenge cases can help with interpretation. An understanding of the appearance of diluted contrast in the small bowel, the concentrating effect of contrast in the colon, and knowledge of surgical history and anatomy is paramount for diagnosis. In this article, we review the approach to acute SBO and the use of gastrografin along with reviewing image interpretation of cases of partial and complete SBO. Gastrografin use in adynamic ileus along with other potential future uses is also discussed.

Small bowel obstruction in the elderly: a plea for comprehensive acute geriatric care

Small bowel obstruction is one of the most frequent emergencies in general surgery, commonly affecting elderly patients. Morbidity and mortality from small bowel obstruction in elderly is high. Significant progress has been made in the diagnosis and management of bowel obstruction in recent years. But little is known whether this progress has benefitted outcomes in elderly patients, particularly those who are frail or have a malignancy as cause of the obstruction, and when considering quality of life and functioning as outcomes. In this review, we discuss the specific challenges and needs of elderly in diagnosis and treatment of small bowel obstruction. We address quality of life aspects and explore how the concept of geriatric assessment can be utilized to improve decision-making and outcomes for elderly patients with a small bowel obstruction.

Small Bowel Obstruction

Identifying patients with small bowel obstruction who need operative intervention and those who will fail nonoperative management is a challenge. Without indications for urgent intervention, a computed tomography scan with/without intravenous contrast should be obtained to identify location, grade, and etiology of the obstruction. Most small bowel obstructions resolve with nonoperative management. Open and laparoscopic operative management are acceptable approaches. Malnutrition needs to be identified early and managed, especially if the patient is to undergo operative management. Confounding conditions include age greater than 65, post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, inflammatory bowel disease, malignancy, virgin abdomen, pregnancy, hernia, and early postoperative state.

Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group

Background

Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common surgical emergency, causing high morbidity and even some mortality. The adhesions causing such bowel obstructions are typically the footprints of previous abdominal surgical procedures. The present paper presents a revised version of the Bologna guidelines to evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of ASBO. The working group has added paragraphs on prevention of ASBO and special patient groups.

Methods

The guideline was written under the auspices of the World Society of Emergency Surgery by the ASBO working group. A systematic literature search was performed prior to the update of the guidelines to identify relevant new papers on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of ASBO. Literature was critically appraised according to an evidence-based guideline development method. Final recommendations were approved by the workgroup, taking into account the level of evidence of the conclusion.

Recommendations

Adhesion formation might be reduced by minimally invasive surgical techniques and the use of adhesion barriers. Non-operative treatment is effective in most patients with ASBO. Contraindications for non-operative treatment include peritonitis, strangulation, and ischemia. When the adhesive etiology of obstruction is unsure, or when contraindications for non-operative management might be present, CT is the diagnostic technique of choice. The principles of non-operative treatment are nil per os, naso-gastric, or long-tube decompression, and intravenous supplementation with fluids and electrolytes. When operative treatment is required, a laparoscopic approach may be beneficial for selected cases of simple ASBO.Younger patients have a higher lifetime risk for recurrent ASBO and might therefore benefit from application of adhesion barriers as both primary and secondary prevention.

Discussion

This guideline presents recommendations that can be used by surgeons who treat patients with ASBO. Scientific evidence for some aspects of ASBO management is scarce, in particular aspects relating to special patient groups. Results of a randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for ASBO are awaited.

Adhesive Closed-loop Small Bowel Obstruction

Complete small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common surgical emergency often resulting from adhesive bands that form following iatrogenic peritoneal injury. Rarely, adhesive SBO may arise without previous intra-abdominal surgery through other modes of peritoneal trauma. We present the case of a male evaluated in the emergency department for a closed-loop small bowel obstruction due to an adhesive band that likely formed after blunt abdominal trauma over two decades earlier. We review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment options for similar cases of adhesive SBO.

A Systematic Review of the Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Small Bowel Obstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study aimed to systematically review small bowel obstruction (SBO), focusing on recent changes in diagnosis/therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

SBO incidence is about 350,000/annum in the USA. Etiologies include adhesions (65%), hernias (10%), neoplasms (5%), Crohn's disease (5%), and other (15%). Bowel dilatation occurs proximal to obstruction primarily from swallowed air and secondarily from intraluminal fluid accumulation. Dilatation increases mural tension, decreases mucosal perfusion, causes bacterial proliferation, and decreases mural tensile strength that increases bowel perforation risks. Classical clinical tetrad is abdominal pain, nausea and emesis, abdominal distention, and constipation-to-obstipation. Physical exam may reveal restlessness, acute illness, and signs of dehydration and sepsis, including tachycardia, pyrexia, dry mucous membranes, hypotension/orthostasis, abdominal distention, and hypoactive bowel sounds. Severe direct tenderness, involuntary guarding, abdominal rigidity, and rebound tenderness suggest advanced SBO, as do marked leukocytosis, neutrophilia, bandemia, and lactic acidosis. Differential diagnosis includes postoperative ileus, narcotic bowel, colonic pseudo-obstruction, mesenteric ischemia, and large bowel obstruction. Medical resuscitation includes intravenous hydration, correcting electrolyte abnormalities, intravenous antibiotics, nil per os, and nasoenteral suction. Abdominal CT with oral and intravenous gastrografin contrast is highly sensitive and specific in detecting/characterizing SBO. SBO usually resolves with medical therapy but requires surgery, preferentially by laparoscopy, for unremitting total obstruction, bowel perforation, severe ischemia, or clinical deterioration with medical therapy. Overall mortality is 10% but increases to 30% with bowel necrosis/perforation. Key point in SBO is early diagnosis, emphasizing abdominal CT; aggressive medical therapy including rehydration, antibiotics, and nil per os; and surgery for failed medical therapy.

Value of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) from adhesive disease presents great burden for the healthcare system. Some groups have reported water soluble contrast agents (WSCA) protocols, but published studies are underpowered. This study introduces a WSCA protocol to improve outcomes and streamline patient care.

STUDY DESIGN

The study ran July 1, 2013-June 30, 2015, at Kaiser Permanente San Diego; protocol started July 1, 2014. Data was collected prospectively, on an intention to treat basis. We excluded patients whose SBO were not due to adhesive disease. Protocol included nasogastric tube, intravenous resuscitation, liquid docusate, and gastrografin study if symptoms persisted at 24 h. Colon contrast determined resolution vs operative consideration. Primary outcomes were operative rates and hospital length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Seven hundred fifteen were patients admitted with SBO; after exclusions there were 261 pre-protocol and 243 protocol patients. One hundred sixty patients resolved within 24 h; 96% of remaining patients stayed on protocol (n = 154). After WSCA protocol began, 15.6% required an operation, compared to 19.8% of pre-protocol patients (NS). The WSCA protocol significantly decreased the time to surgery (2.8 vs 4.88 days, p = 0.03), and the LOS of operated patients (9.51 vs 15.78 days, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized SBO protocol using WSCA significantly decreased time to operation and hospital LOS. This approach improves utilization of resources and may improve outcomes. More work should be done to investigate the positive effects of WSCA protocol for patients with SBO.

Haemorrhagic gastritis following Gastrografin administration for adhesive small bowel obstruction: A case report of a rare outcome

•

First reported case of haemorrhagic gastritis post Gastrografin for adhesive SBO.

•

Gastrografin is proven to be effective and generally safe in adhesive SBO.

•

Caution may be warranted when considering Gastrografin in patients at risk of gastropathy.

Introduction

Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is common after abdominal surgery. Water soluble contrast agents (WSCA) such as Gastrografin have been demonstrated to be safe and effective in predicting resolution of ASBO with conservative management while decreasing the time to resolution, decreasing the need for surgery and reducing overall length of stay. Few adverse effects have been reported. To the authors knowledge this is the first report of haemorrhagic gastritis following administration of Gastrografin for ASBO.

Presentation of case

We present a case of haemorrhagic gastritis following Gastrografin administration in a 69-year-old male with adhesive small bowel obstruction who was managed conservatively with a good outcome. The report complies with the criteria outlined in the SCARE statement (Product Information Gastrografin [Product information], 2013).

Discussion

The characteristics, mechanism of action, safety profile and efficacy of Gastrografin in ASBO are discussed along with the possible mechanisms underlying the haemorrhagic gastritis.

Conclusion

This patient at high risk of gastropathy experienced haemorrhagic gastritis following administration of Gastrografin for adhesive small bowel obstruction. WSCA such as Gastrografin are usually safe and effective in ASBO however caution may be warranted in patients at high risk of gastropathy.

Adhesive small bowel adhesions obstruction: Evolutions in diagnosis, management and prevention

Intra-abdominal adhesions following abdominal surgery represent a major unsolved problem. They are the first cause of small bowel obstruction. Diagnosis is based on clinical evaluation, water-soluble contrast follow-through and computed tomography scan. For patients presenting no signs of strangulation, peritonitis or severe intestinal impairment there is good evidence to support non-operative management. Open surgery is the preferred method for the surgical treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction, in case of suspected strangulation or after failed conservative management, but laparoscopy is gaining widespread acceptance especially in selected group of patients. "Good" surgical technique and anti-adhesive barriers are the main current concepts of adhesion prevention. We discuss current knowledge in modern diagnosis and evolving strategies for management and prevention that are leading to stratified care for patients.

Small bowel obstruction: A practical step-by-step evidence-based approach to evaluation, decision making, and management

The initial goal of evaluating a patient with SBO is to immediately identify strangulation and need for urgent operative intervention, concurrent with rapid resuscitation. This relies on a combination of traditional clinical signs and CT findings. In patients without signs of strangulation, a protocol for administration of Gastrografin immediately in the emergency department efficiently sorts patients into those who will resolve their obstructions and those who will fail nonoperative management.Furthermore, because of the unique ability of Gastrografin to draw water into the bowel lumen, it expedites resolution of partial obstructions, shortening time to removal of nasogastric tube liberalization of diet, and discharge from the hospital. Implementation of such a protocol is a complex, multidisciplinary, and time-consuming endeavor. As such, we cannot over emphasize the importance of clear, open communication with everyone involved.If surgical management is warranted, we encourage an initial laparoscopic approach with open access. Even if this results in immediate conversion to laparotomy after assessment of the intra-abdominal status, we encourage this approach with a goal of 30% conversion rate or higher. This will attest that patients will have been given the highest likelihood of a successful laparoscopic LOA.