Reconstitution fluid type does not affect pulmonary inflammation or DNA damage following infusion of lyophilized plasma

Temporal profile of the pro- and anti-inflammatory responses to severe hemorrhage in patients with venous thromboembolism: Findings from the PROPPR trial

BACKGROUND

The Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) trial showed that 15% of patients developed venous thromboembolism (VTE) following hemorrhage, but the mechanisms are unknown. Since inflammation is associated with hypercoagulability and thrombosis, our goal was to compare the temporal inflammatory profile following hemorrhagic shock in patients with and without VTE.

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis was performed on data collected from PROPPR. Blood samples collected at 0 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours following admission were assayed on a 27-target cytokine panel, and compared between VTE (n = 83) and non-VTE (n = 475) patients. p < 0.05 indicated significance.

RESULTS

Over time, both groups exhibited elevations in proinflammatory mediators interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 57, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and macrophage inflammatory protein 1β, and anti-inflammatory mediators IL-1ra and IL-10 (p < 0.05 vs. admission). Venous thromboembolism patients showed amplified responses for IL-6 (6-72 hours) and IL-8 (6-24 hours), which peaked at later time points, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 57 (12-24 hours), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (6-72 hours), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 β (2-12 hours) (p < 0.05 vs. non-VTE per time point) that peaked at similar time points to non-VTE patients. The anti-inflammatory responses were similar between groups, but the interleukin-mediated proinflammatory responses continued to rise after the peak anti-inflammatory response in the VTE group. The occurrence rate of adverse events was higher in VTE (97%) versus non-VTE (87%, p = 0.009) and was associated with higher inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with VTE following hemorrhagic shock exhibited a prolonged and amplified proinflammatory responses mediated by select interleukin, chemotactic, and glycoprotein cytokines that are not antagonized by anti-inflammatory mediators. This response is not related to randomization group, injury severity or degree of shock, but may be linked to adverse events.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, level III.

Freeze-dried plasma for major trauma - Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of acute trauma coagulopathy has shifted toward rapid replacement of coagulation factors with frozen plasma (FP). There are logistic difficulties in providing FP. Freeze-dried plasma (FDP) may have logistical advantages including easier storage and rapid preparation time. This review assesses the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of FDP in trauma.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Studies were searched from Medline, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar. Observational and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing FDP use in trauma were included. Trauma animal models addressing FDP use were also included. Bias was assessed using validated tools. Primary outcome was efficacy, and secondary outcomes were feasibility and safety. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effect models. Evidence was graded using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation profile.

RESULTS

Twelve human studies (RCT, 1; observational, 11) and 15 animal studies were included. Overall, studies demonstrated moderate risk of bias. Data from two studies (n = 119) were combined for meta-analyses for mortality and transfusion of allogeneic blood products (ABPs). For both outcomes, no difference was identified. For mortality, pooled odds ratio was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.29-1.49), with I2 = 0%. Use of FDP is feasible, and no adverse events were reported. Animal data suggest similar results for coagulation and anti-inflammatory profiles for FP and FDP.

CONCLUSION

Human data assessing FDP use in trauma report no difference in mortality and transfusion of ABPs in patients receiving FDP compared with FP. Data from animal trauma studies report no difference in coagulation factor and anti-inflammatory profiles between FP and FDP. Results should be interpreted with caution because most studies were observational and have heterogeneous population (military and civilian trauma) and a moderate risk of bias. Well-designed prospective observational studies or, preferentially, RCTs are warranted to answer FDP's effect on laboratory (coagulation factor levels), transfusion (number of ABPs), and clinical outcomes (organ dysfunction, length of stay, and mortality).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review and meta-analysis, level IV.

Dried Plasma

Dried plasma provides an alternative for early plasma transfusion in the resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock in environments where fresh frozen plasma is not immediately available. It is produced by freeze-drying or spray-drying liquid or thawed plasma. It is shelf-stable for prolonged periods, can be stored at room temperature, and is easy to transport, reconstitute, and administer. It was widely used in WWII but fell out of favor due to the risk of infectious disease transmission. The German and French experiences with lyophilized plasma are the most extensive and show a good track record of efficacy and safety. Recent studies show many beneficial effects of dried plasma in the treatment of shock in large animal models. Currently, no FDA-licensed product is available in the USA, but several are under development.

Resuscitation with Lyophilized Plasma Is Safe and Improves Neurological Recovery in a Long-Term Survival Model of Swine Subjected to Traumatic Brain Injury, Hemorrhagic Shock, and Polytrauma

We have shown previously that fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and lyophilized plasma (LP) decrease brain lesion size and improve neurological recovery in a swine model of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hemorrhagic shock (HS). In this study, we examine whether these findings can be validated in a clinically relevant model of severe TBI, HS, and polytrauma. Female Yorkshire swine were subjected to TBI (controlled cortical impact), hemorrhage (40% volume), grade III liver and splenic injuries, rib fracture, and rectus abdominis crush. The animals were maintained in a state of shock (mean arterial pressure 30-35 mm Hg) for 2 h, and then randomized to resuscitation with normal saline (NS), FFP, or LP (n = 5 swine/group). Animals were recovered and monitored for 30 d, during which time neurological recovery was assessed. Brain lesion sizes were measured via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on post-injury days (PID) three and 10. Animals were euthanized on PID 30. The severity of shock and response to resuscitation was similar in all groups. When compared with NS-treated animals, plasma-treated animals (FFP and LP) had significantly lower neurologic severity scores (PID 1-7) and a faster return to baseline neurological function. There was no significant difference in brain lesion sizes between groups. LP treatment was well tolerated and similar to FFP. In this clinically relevant large animal model of severe TBI, HS, and polytrauma, we have shown that plasma-based resuscitation strategies are safe and result in neurocognitive recovery that is faster than recovery after NS-based resuscitation.