A pilot single-institution predictive model to guide rib fracture management in elderly patients

Clinical prediction models for the management of blunt chest trauma in the emergency department: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate how clinical prediction models compare in terms of their methodological development, validation, and predictive capabilities, for patients with blunt chest trauma presenting to the Emergency Department.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted across databases from 1st Jan 2000 until 1st April 2024. Studies were categorised into three types of multivariable prediction research and data extracted regarding methodological issues and the predictive capabilities of each model. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed.

RESULTS

41 studies were included that discussed 22 different models. The most commonly observed study design was a single-centre, retrospective, chart review. The most widely externally validated clinical prediction models with moderate to good discrimination were the Thoracic Trauma Severity Score and the STUMBL Score.

DISCUSSION

This review demonstrates that the predictive ability of some of the existing clinical prediction models is acceptable, but high risk of bias and lack of subsequent external validation limits the extensive application of the models. The Thoracic Trauma Severity Score and STUMBL Score demonstrate better predictive accuracy in both development and external validation studies than the other models, but require recalibration and / or update and evaluation of their clinical and cost effectiveness.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO database ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=351638 ).

Geriatric Trauma Intensive Care Unit Admission Guideline Is Associated With Reduction in Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Admissions

INTRODUCTION

Geriatric trauma patients experience disproportionate adverse outcomes compared to younger patients with similar injuries and represent an important target for quality improvement. Our institution created a Geriatric Trauma Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission Guideline to identify high-risk patients and elevate their initial level of care. The goal of implementation was reducing unplanned ICU admissions (UIAs), a recognized surrogate marker for adverse outcomes.

METHODS

The Geriatric Trauma ICU Admission Guideline was implemented on July 1, 2020, at a large academic level-1 trauma center. Using trauma registry data, we retrospectively analyzed geriatric patients who met the criteria for ICU admission 2 y preimplementation and postimplementation. The main outcome was UIAs in the target geriatric population. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, ventilator days, mortality, and 30-d readmissions. Characteristics between groups were compared with t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, or chi-square test. Risk-adjusted logistic and negative binomial regressions were used for the categorical and continuous outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 1075 patients were identified with 476 in the preimplementation and 599 in the postimplementation group. The groups were similar across most demographic and physiologic characteristics, with the exception of a higher incidence of hypertension in the preimplementation group (77.7% versus 71.6%, P = 0.02) and COVID in the postimplementation group (3.8% versus 0.4%, P < 0.001). While mechanism of injury was similar, there was a higher incidence of traumatic brain injury in the preimplementation group (35.1% versus 26.2%, P = 0.002). In the postimplementation group, there was a higher incidence ≥3 rib fractures (68% versus 61.3%, P = 0.02) and an expected increase in initial ICU level of care (69.5% versus 37.1%, P < 0.001). The odds of a UIA after guideline implementation were reduced by half (adjusted odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.3-0.92). There was not a significant difference in the secondary outcomes of mortality, 30-d readmission, hospital-free days, ICU-free days, or ventilator-free days.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the Geriatric Trauma ICU Admission Guideline was associated with a reduction in UIAs by half in the target population. There was not a significant change in hospital-free days, ICU-free days, ventilator-free days, mortality, 30-d readmission, or venous thromboembolism. Further research is needed to better refine admission guidelines, examine the association of preventative admission on delirium, and determination of criteria that would allow safe, earlier downgrade.

Thoracic trauma: Clinical and paleopathological perspectives

OBJECTIVES

Although trauma is one of the most significant areas of study in paleopathology, most studies focus on fractures of single anatomical elements. Paleopathological research on regional trauma, such as of the thorax, is rare. This paper explores the causes, complications, and consequences of adult thoracic trauma using clinical data in order to inform paleopathological research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Trends in paleopathological thoracic trauma literature were assessed by evaluating publications from Bioarchaeology International, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, International Journal of Paleopathology, and American Journal of Biological Anthropology. Clinical publications on thoracic trauma throughout time were also assessed through a PubMed search, and modern prevalence data was found through trauma databases such as the National Trauma Databank.

RESULTS

Consideration of thoracic trauma involving concomitant injuries is a recent trend in clinical literature and patient care, but paleopathological research on thoracic trauma has been limited. Since thoracic fractures tend to occur in conjunction with other injuries, assessing them together is critical to the interpretation of trauma in the past.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical research into thoracic fractures and concomitant injuries provides valuable data for paleopathological research. Evaluating the likelihood and consequences of concomitant injury in skeletal remains provides a more robust understanding of trauma in the past and its impact on past lifeways.

SIGNIFICANCE

This paper provides a review of current clinical and paleopathological literature on thoracic trauma and demonstrates the importance of moving beyond the analysis of fractures or trauma of single anatomical elements.

LIMITATIONS

Thoracic bones are often taphonomically altered and differentially preserved leading to difficulty in identifying and interpreting fractures.

SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Practical application of the data presented here to archaeological samples will help to advance paleopathological understandings of thoracic trauma.

Prospective validation of the Rib Injury Guidelines for traumatic rib fractures

INTRODUCTION

The Rib Injury Guidelines (RIG) were developed to guide triage of traumatic rib fracture patients to home, regular floor, or intensive care unit (ICU) and standardize care. The RIG score is based on patient history, physical examination, and imaging findings. The aim of this study was to evaluate triage effectiveness and health care resources utilization following RIG implementation.

METHODS

This is a prospective analysis at a level I trauma center from October 2017 to January 2020. Adult (18 years or older) blunt trauma patients with a diagnosis of at least one rib fracture on computed tomography imaging were included. Patients before (PRE) and after (POST) implementation of RIG were compared. In the POST group, patients were divided into RIG 1, RIG 2, and RIG 3 based on their RIG score. Outcomes were readmission for RIG 1 patients, unplanned ICU admission for RIG 2 patients, and overall ICU admission. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,100 patients were identified (PRE, 754; POST, 346). Mean ± SD age was 56 ± 19 years, 788 (71.6%) were male, and median Injury Severity Score was 14 (range, 10-22). The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (554 [50.3%]), 253 patients (22.9%) had ≥5 rib fractures, and 53 patients (4.8%) had a flail chest. In the POST group, 74 patients (21.1%) were RIG 1; 121 (35.2%), RIG 2; and 151 (43.7%), RIG 3. No patient in RIG 1 was readmitted following initial discharge, and two patients (1.6%) in RIG 2 had an unplanned ICU admission (both for alcohol withdrawal syndrome). Patients after implementation of RIG had shorter hospital LOS (3 [1-6] vs. 4 [1-7] days; p = 0.019) and no difference in mortality (5.8% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.252). On multivariate analysis, RIG implementation was associated with decreased ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55 [0.36-0.82]; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Rib Injury Guidelines are safe and effectively define triage of rib fracture patients with an overall reduction in ICU admissions, shorter hospital LOS, and no readmissions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Improving Blunt Chest Wall Injury Outcomes: Introducing the PIC Score

BACKGROUND

To improve care for nonintubated blunt chest wall injury patients, our Level I trauma center developed a treatment protocol and a pulmonary evaluation tool named "PIC Protocol" and "PIC Score," emphasizing continual assessment of pain, incentive spirometry, and cough ability.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to reduce unplanned intensive care unit admissions for blunt chest wall injury patients using the PIC Protocol and the PIC Score. Additional outcomes included intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator days, length of hospital stay, inhospital mortality, and discharge destination.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes of rib fracture patients treated at our facility 2 years prior to (control group) and 2 years following PIC Protocol use (PIC group). The protocol included admission screening, a power plan order set, the PIC Score patient assessment tool, in-room communication board, and patient education brochure. Outcomes were compared using independent-samples t tests for continuous variables and Pearson's χ2 for categorical variables with α set to p < .05.

RESULTS

There were 1,036 patients in the study (control = 501; PIC = 535). Demographics and injury severity were similar between groups. Unanticipated escalations of care for acute pulmonary distress were reduced from 3% (15/501) in the control group to 0.37% (2/535) in the PIC group and were predicted by a preceding fall in the PIC Score of 3 points over the previous 8-hr shift, marking pulmonary decline by an acutely falling PIC Score.

CONCLUSIONS

The PIC Protocol and the PIC Score are easy-to-use, cost-effective tools for guiding care of blunt chest wall injury patients.

Utilizing triage rates to improve ICU admission guidelines of elderly rib fracture patients

BACKGROUND

Elderly rib fracture patients are generally admitted to an ICU which may result in overutilization of scarce resources. We hypothesized that this practice results in significant overtriage.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients over age 70 with acute rib fracture(s) as sole indication for ICU admission. Primary outcomes were adverse events (intubation, pneumonia, death), which we classified as meriting ICU admission. We utilized Cribari matrices to calculate triage rates.

RESULTS

101 patients met study criteria. 12% had adverse events occurring on average at day 5. Our undertriage rate was 6% and overtriage rate 87%. The 72 overtriaged patients utilized 295 total ICU days. Evaluating guideline modification, ≥3 fractures appears optimal. Changing to this would have liberated 50 ICU days with 3% undertriage.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with small numbers of rib fractures are overtriaged to ICUs. Modifying guidelines to ≥3 rib fractures will improve resource utilization and save ICU beds.

A clinical practice guideline using percentage of predicted forced vital capacity improves resource allocation for rib fracture patients

BACKGROUND

Predicting rib fracture patients that will require higher-level care is a challenge during patient triage. Percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) incorporates patient-specific factors to customize the measurements to each patient. A single institution transitioned from a clinical practice guideline (CPG) using absolute forced vital capacity (FVC) to one using FVC% to improve triage of rib fracture patients. This study compares the outcomes of patients before and after the CPG change.

METHODS

A review of rib fracture patients was performed over a 3-year retrospective period (RETRO) and 1-year prospective period (PRO). RETRO patients were triaged by absolute FVC. Percentage of predicted FVC was used to triage PRO patients. Demographics, mechanism, Injury Severity Score, chest Abbreviated Injury Scale score, number of rib fractures, tube thoracostomy, intubation, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), transfer to ICU, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and mortality data were compared. A multivariable model was constructed to perform adjusted analysis for LOS.

RESULTS

There were 588 patients eligible for the study, with 269 RETRO and 319 PRO patients. No significant differences in age, gender, or injury details were identified. Fewer tube thoracostomy were performed in PRO patients. Rates of intubation, admission to ICU, and mortality were similar. The PRO cohort had fewer ICU transfers and shorter LOS and ICU LOS. Multivariable logistic regression identified a 78% reduction in odds of ICU transfer among PRO patients. Adjusted analysis with multiple linear regression showed LOS was decreased 1.28 days by being a PRO patient in the study (B = -1.44; p < 0.001) with R2 = 0.198.

CONCLUSION

Percentage of predicted FVC better stratified rib fracture patients leading to a decrease in transfers to the ICU, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS. By incorporating patient-specific factors into the triage decision, the new CPG optimized triage and decreased resource utilization over the study period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management. Trauma, Rib, Triage, level IV.

Association of Hospital-Level Intensive Care Unit Use and Outcomes in Older Patients With Isolated Rib Fractures

IMPORTANCE

The optimal level of care for older patients with rib fractures as an isolated injury is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize interhospital variability in intensive care unit (ICU) vs non-ICU admission of older patients with isolated rib fractures and to evaluate whether greater hospital-level use of ICU admission is associated with improved outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study included trauma patients aged 65 years and older with isolated rib fractures who were admitted to US trauma centers participating in the National Trauma Data Bank between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. Patients were excluded if they had other significant injuries, were intubated or had assisted respirations in the emergency department (ED), or had a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of less than 9 in the ED. Hospitals with fewer than 10 eligible patients were excluded. Data analysis was conducted from May 2019 through September 2020.

EXPOSURES

Admission to the ICU.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Composite of unplanned intubation, pneumonia, or death during hospitalization.

RESULTS

Among 23 951 patients (11 066 [46.2%] women; mean [SD] age, 77.0 [7.2] years) at 573 hospitals, the median (interquartile range) proportion of ICU use was 16.7% (7.4%-32.0%), but this varied from a low of 0% to a high of 91.9%. The composite outcome occurred in 787 patients (3.3%), with unplanned intubation in 317 (1.3%), pneumonia in 180 (0.8%), and death in 451 (1.9%). Accounting for the hierarchical nature of the data and adjusting for propensity scores reflecting factors associated with ICU admission, receiving care at a hospital with the greatest ICU use (quartile 4), compared with a hospital with the lowest ICU use, was associated with decreased likelihood of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, admission location of older patients with isolated rib fractures was variable across hospitals, but hospitalization at a center with greater ICU use was associated with improved outcomes. It may be warranted for hospitals with low ICU use to admit more such patients to an ICU.

How does the implementation of a patient pathway-based intervention in the acute care of blunt thoracic injury impact on patient outcomes? A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Blunt thoracic injury is present in around 15% of all major trauma presentations. To ensure a standardised approach to the management of physical injury, patient pathway-based interventions have been established in many healthcare settings. It currently remains unclear how these complex interventions are implemented and evaluated in the literature. This systematic review aims to identify pathway effectiveness literature and implementation studies in relation to patient pathway-based interventions in blunt thoracic injury care.

METHODS

The databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, WHO Clinical Trials Register and both the GreyLit & OpenGrey databases were searched without restrictions on date or study type. A search strategy was developed including keywords and MeSH terms relating to blunt thoracic injury, patient pathway-based interventions, evaluation and implementation. Due to heterogeneity of intervention pathways, meta-analysis was not possible; analysis was undertaken using an iterative narrative approach.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in analysis. Pathways were identified covering analgesic management, respiratory care, surgical decision making and reducing risk of complications. Studies evaluating pathways are generally limited by their observational and retrospective design, but results highlight the potential benefits of pathway driven care provision in blunt thoracic injury.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate the complexity of evaluating patient pathway-based interventions in blunt thoracic injury management. It is important that pathways undergo rigorous evaluation, refinement and validation to ensure quality and patient safety. Strong recommendations are precluded as the quality of the pathway evaluation studies are low.

Triage of Patients With Rib Fractures

Background

Most triage guidelines for blunt chest wall trauma focus on advanced age and multiple fractured ribs to indicate a high-risk patient population that should be admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). Overly sensitive ICU admission criteria, however, may result in overutilization of resources. We revised our rib fracture triage guideline to de-emphasize age and number of rib fractures, hypothesizing that we could lower ICU admission rates without compromising outcomes.

Methods

Patients admitted to our level 1 trauma center over 9 months after the institution of the revised guideline (N = 248) were compared with those admitted over 6 months following the original guideline (N = 207) using Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests, as appropriate. Univariate followed by multivariate analyses were performed to determine risk factors for complications.

Results

The ICU admission rate significantly decreased from 73% to 63% ( P = .02) after the institution of the revised guideline, despite an increase in the patient’s age and injury acuity of the cohort. There was no significant difference in respiratory complications, unplanned ICU admission rates, and overall mortality. Poor incentive spirometer effort (750 mL or less) and dyspnea in the trauma bay were the strongest predictors of an adverse composite outcome and prolonged hospital length of stay.

Discussion

A revised rib fracture triage guideline with less emphasis on the patient’s age and the number of fractured ribs safely lowered ICU admission rates. Poor functional status rather than age and anatomy was the strongest predictor of complications and prolonged hospital stay.

Determining the clinical significance of the Chest Wall Injury Society taxonomy for multiple rib fractures

BACKGROUND

The Chest Wall Injury Society (CWIS) proposals for standardized nomenclature for multiple rib fracture (MRF) classifications were derived by international expert Delphi consensus. This study aimed to validate the CWIS taxonomy using a single-instituion clinical database.

METHODS

Computed tomography (CT) scans, of 539 consecutive patients with MRFs admitted to a regional major trauma center over a 33-month period, were reviewed (blinded for clinical outcomes). Every rib fracture in every patient was assessed according to each of the CWIS criteria (the degree of displacement, characterization of the fracture line, location of each fracture, and the relationship to neighboring fractures). The clinical significance of the proposed CWIS definitions were determined from independently coded, routinely collected Hospital Episodes Statistics data.

RESULTS

The radiologic aspects of 3,944 individual rib fractures were assessed. Indicators of injury severity (severe displacement greater series length, and flail segment) were positively associated with other fractures (p < 0.001), hemopneumothorax (p < 0.001), pulmonary complications (p = 0.002), adverse outcomes (p = 0.006), mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001) and prolonged hospital and intensive therapy unit length of stay (p = 0.006, p = 0.007 respectively). Four of the CWIS-proposed definitions were correlated with pulmonary complications and adverse outcomes: the categories of displacement, the definition of individual fracture characterization, the presence of a flail segment. Two definitions for which there was CWIS consensus were not correlated with clinical outcomes: the definition of a series to describe associated fractures on neighboring ribs, the inclusion of a paravertebral sector for fracture localization.

CONCLUSION

The CWIS rib fracture taxonomy demonstrates clinical relevance. There were associations between the severity of category groups within three of the proposed definitions, based on the clinical outcomes observed. Clinical outcome assessment proved inconclusive for four agreed definitions. Comprehensive, multiinstitutional data collection would be required to provide validation for all the CWIS-proposed definitions.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

The Sequential Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Function (SCARF) score: A dynamic pulmonary physiologic score that predicts adverse outcomes in critically ill rib fracture patients

BACKGROUND

Rib fracture scoring systems are limited by a lack of serial pulmonary physiologic variables. We created the Sequential Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Function (SCARF) score and hypothesized that admission, maximum, and rising scores predict adverse outcomes among critically ill rib fracture patients.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of rib fracture patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at a Level I trauma center from August 2017 to June 2018. The SCARF score was developed a priori and validated using the cohort. One point was assigned for: <50% predicted, respiratory rate >20, numeric pain score ≥5, and inadequate cough. Demographics, injury patterns, analgesics, and adverse pulmonary outcomes were abstracted. Performance characteristics of the score were assessed using the receiver operator curve area under the curve.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty scores were available from 100 patients. Median admission and maximum SCARF score was 2 (range 0-4). Likelihood of pneumonia (p = 0.04), high oxygen requirement (p < 0.01), and prolonged ICU length of stay (p < 0.01) were significantly associated with admission and maximum scores. The receiver operator curve area under the curve for the maximum SCARF score for these outcomes were 0.86, 0.76, and 0.79, respectively. In 10 patients, the SCARF score worsened from admission to day 2; these patients demonstrated increased likelihood of pneumonia (p = 0.04) and prolonged ICU length of stay (p = 0.07). Patients who developed complications maintained a SCARF score one point higher throughout ICU stay compared with patients who did not (p = 0.04). The SCARF score was significantly associated with both narcotic (p = 0.03) and locoregional anesthesia (p = 0.03) usage.

CONCLUSION

Admission, maximum, daily, and rising scores were associated with utilization of pain control therapies and development of adverse outcomes. The SCARF score may be used to guide therapies for critically ill rib fracture patients, with a proposed threshold greater than 2.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, level II.

The impact of frailty in critically ill patients after trauma: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

As our population ages, older adults are increasingly exposed to trauma. Frailty could be a useful measure to identify patients at risk of a poor outcome. This study aimed to determine the impact of frailty in an Australian trauma intensive care unit (ICU) population.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of critically ill trauma patients ≥50 years of age. Frailty was determined on admission to the ICU using the frailty phenotype. Demographic and hospital data were collected, and patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was 12-month mortality, and multiple regression was used to determine associated factors.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-eight patients were included, whose mean age was 68 years; 78.2% (108/138) were classified as major trauma (Injury Severity Score >12). Twenty-two percent (30/138) of patients were identified as frail. Patients with frailty were significantly older: however, they were less severely injured and required lower rates of surgical interventions and mechanical ventilation. Frailty was independently associated with mortality at 6 and 12 months (odds ratio: 5.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-18.1 and odds ratio: 7.3, 95% confidence interval: 2.5-21.9, respectively). Patients with frailty had lower measures of global functioning (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended frail 3 [1-5] vs nonfrail 6 [(5-7], p = 0.002) and health status (Euro Qol 5Q-5D-5L utility score 0.6 [0.5-0.7] vs 0.7 [0.6-0.9], p = 0.02) at 12 months than patients without frailty.

CONCLUSION

Frailty is a useful predictor of poor outcomes in critically ill trauma patients.

REGISTRATION OF PROTOCOL NUMBER

ACTRN12615000039583.

Timing and methods of frailty assessments in geriatric trauma patients: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The trauma population is aging and better prognostic measures for geriatric trauma patients are required. Frailty rather than age appears to be associated with poor outcomes. This systematic review aimed to identify the optimum frailty assessment instrument and timing of assessment in patients aged over 65 years admitted to hospital after traumatic injury. The secondary aim was to evaluate outcomes associated with frailty in elderly trauma populations.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42018090620). A MEDLINE and EMBASE literature search was conducted from inception to June 2019 combining the concepts of injury, geriatric, frailty, assessment and prognosis. Included studies were in patients 65 years or older hospitalised after injury and exposed to an instrument meeting consensus definition for frailty assessment. Study quality was assessed using criteria for review of prognostic studies combined with a GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight papers met inclusion criteria. Twenty-eight frailty or component instruments were reported, and assessments of pre-injury frailty were made up to 1-year post injury. Pre-injury frailty prevalence varied from 13% (13/100) to 94% (17/18), with in-hospital mortality rates from 2% (5/250) to 33% (6/18). Eleven studies found an association between frailty and mortality. Eleven studies reported an association between frailty and a composite outcome of mortality and adverse discharge destination. Generalisability and assessment of strength of associations was limited by single centre studies with inconsistent findings and overlapping cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Associations between frailty and adverse outcomes including mortality in geriatric trauma patients were demonstrated despite a range of frailty instruments, administering clinicians, time of assessment and data sources. Although evidence gaps remain, incorporating frailty assessment into trauma systems is likely to identify geriatric patients at risk of adverse outcomes. Consistency in frailty instruments and long-term geriatric specific outcome measures will improve research relevance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III prognostic.

Older Adults With Isolated Rib Fractures Do Not Require Routine Intensive Care Unit Admission

BACKGROUND

Older adults with isolated rib fractures are often admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) because of presumedly increased morbidity and mortality. However, evidence-based guidelines are limited. We sought to identify characteristics of these patients that predict the need for ICU care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed patients ≥50 y old at our center during 2013-2017 whose only indication for ICU admission, if any, was isolated rib fractures. The primary outcome was any critical care intervention (e.g., intubation) or adverse event (e.g., hypoxemia) (CCIE) based on accepted critical care guidelines. We used stepwise logistic regression to identify characteristics that predict CCIEs.

RESULTS

Among 401 patients, 251 (63%) were admitted to an ICU. Eighty-three patients (33%) admitted to an ICU and 7 (5%) admitted to the ward experienced a CCIE. The most common CCIEs were hypotension (10%), frequent respiratory therapy (9%), and oxygen desaturation (8%). Predictors of CCIEs included incentive spirometry <1 L (OR 4.72, 95% CI 2.14-10.45); use of a walker (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.29-6.34); increased chest Abbreviated Injury Scale score (AIS 3 OR 5.83, 95% CI 2.34-14.50); age ≥72 y (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.48-4.86); and active smoking (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.06-4.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine ICU admission is not necessary for most older adults with isolated rib fractures. The predictors we identified warrant prospective evaluation for development of a clinical decision rule to preclude unnecessary ICU admissions.

Emergency department management of patients with rib fracture based on a clinical practice guideline

Background

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have the ability to increase efficiency and standardize care. A CPG based on forced vital capacity (FVC) for rib fractures was developed as a tool for triage of these patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy and compliance of physicians with this rib fracture CPG.

Methods

Patients >18 that were discharged from an urban level 2 trauma center emergency department (ED) between the dates of January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016, were eligible for the study. Demographics, mechanism, outcomes and FVC were abstracted by review of the electronic medical record. Compliance with the CPG was examined, and comparisons were made between patients successfully discharged and patients who returned.

Results

455 patients met were identified during the study period. 233 were eligible after exclusions. 64% of the cohort was male with median age of 53 years. Falls were the most common mechanism (59.6%). The median number of rib fractures was 2 and median FVC 2500 mL. 28 (12.0%) of the 233 returned to the ED after discharge. The groups were well matched with no significant differences. The most common reason for return was pain (95%). Adjusted analysis showed that increasing age (adjusted OR (AOR) 0.968) and FVC (AOR 0.999) were independent predictors. Adherence with the CPG was good for hemothorax/pneumothorax and bilateral fractures (96%), but lagged with the number of fractures (74%).

Conclusions

This study confirms that the rib fracture CPG is safe and an FVC of 1500 mL is a safe criterion for discharging patients with rib fractures. Interestingly, it appears that older age is protective. More work needs to be done on effective pain control to decrease return to ED visits using this CPG.

Level of evidence

IV.

Type of study

Therapeutic.

Guideline-Driven Care Improves Outcomes in Patients with Traumatic Rib Fractures

There is no established national standard for rib fracture management. A clinical practice guideline (CPG) for rib fractures, including monitoring of pulmonary function, early initiation of aggressive loco-regional analgesia, and early identification of deteriorating respiratory function, was implemented in 2013. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of the CPG on hospital length of stay. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was compared for adult patients admitted to the hospital with rib fracture(s) two years before and two years after CPG implementation. A separate analysis was done for the patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Over the 48-month study period, 571 patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Pre-CPG and CPG study groups were well matched with few differences. Multivariable regression did not demonstrate a difference in LOS (B = -0.838; P = 0.095) in the total study cohort. In the ICU cohort (n = 274), patients in the CPG group were older (57 vs 52 years; P = 0.023) and had more rib fractures (4 vs 3; P = 0.003). Multivariable regression identified a significant decrease in LOS for those patients admitted in the CPG period (B = -2.29; P = 0.019). Despite being significantly older with more rib fractures in the ICU cohort, patients admitted after implementation of the CPG had a significantly reduced LOS on multivariable analysis, reducing LOS by over two days. This structured intervention can limit narcotic usage, improve pulmonary function, and decrease LOS in the most injured patients with chest trauma.

Risk factors for adverse outcomes in older adults with blunt chest trauma: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to systematically review the published literature for risk factors associated with adverse outcomes in older adults sustaining blunt chest trauma.

METHODS

EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched from inception until March 2017 for prognostic factors associated with adverse outcomes in older adults sustaining blunt chest trauma using a pre-specified search strategy. References were independently screened for inclusion by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Where appropriate, descriptive statistics were used to evaluate study characteristics and predictors of adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirteen cohort studies representing 79,313 patients satisfied our selection criteria. Overall, 26 prognostic factors were examined across studies and were reported for morbidity (8 studies), length of stay (7 studies), mortality (6 studies), and loss of independence (1 study). No studies examined patient quality of life or emergency department recidivism. Prognostic factors associated with morbidity and mortality included age, number of rib fractures, and injury severity score. Although age and rib fractures were found to be associated with adverse outcomes in more than 3 studies, meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity amongst included studies in how these variables were measured.

CONCLUSIONS

While blunt chest wall trauma in older adults is relatively common, the literature on prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in this patient population remains inadequate due to a paucity of high quality studies and lack of consistent reporting standards.

Operative Treatment of Rib Fractures in Flail Chest Injuries: A Meta-analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Flail chest is a common injury sustained by patients who experience high-energy blunt chest trauma and results in severe respiratory compromise because of altered mechanics of respiration. There has been increased interest in operative fixation of these injuries with the intention of restoring the mechanical integrity of the chest wall, and several studies have shown that ventilation requirements and pulmonary complications may be decreased with operative intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate fixation of rib fractures in flail chest injuries using cost-effectiveness analysis, supported by systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This was a 2-part study in which we initially conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on outcomes after operative fixation of flail chest injuries, evaluating intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital length of stay (LOS), mortality, pneumonia, and need for tracheostomy. The results were then applied to a decision-analysis model comparing the costs and outcomes of operative fixation versus nonoperative treatment. The validity of the results was tested using probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Operative treatment decreased mortality, pneumonia, and tracheotomy (risk ratios of 0.44, 0.59, and 0.52, respectively), as well as time in ICU and total LOS (3.3 and 4.8 days, respectively). Operative fixation was associated with higher costs than nonoperative treatment ($23,682 vs. $8629 per case, respectively) and superior outcomes (32.60 quality-adjusted life year (QALY) vs. 30.84 QALY), giving it an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $8577/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical fixation of rib fractures sustained from flail chest injuries decreased ICU time, mortality, pulmonary complications, and hospital LOS and resulted in improved health care-related outcomes and was a cost-effective intervention. These results were sensitive to overall complication rates, and operations should be conducted by surgeons or combined surgical teams comfortable with both thoracic anatomy and exposures as well as with the principles and techniques of internal fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Rib Fracture Protocol Advancing the Care of the Elderly Patient

This article discusses unique factors associated with rib fractures in the elderly patient population and explains the process used in one facility to develop a revised protocol for the management of elderly patients with a rib fracture. The goals were to eliminate gaps in early trauma care management and employ a care routine that would improve outcomes for this vulnerable group of patients with fracture.