Update of use of hydroxyethyl starches in surgery and trauma

Hydroxyethyl starch and acute kidney injury in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions increase the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) for medical indications. We conducted a cohort study to evaluate the renal safety of modern 6% HES solutions in high-risk patients having cardiac surgery.

METHOD

In this multicentre prospective cohort study, we recruited 261 consecutive patients at high-risk for developing cardiac surgery-associated AKI, based on a Cleveland score ≥ 4 points, from July to December 2017th in 14 hospitals in Spain and the United Kingdom. Multivariable logistic regression modeling and propensity-score matched-pairs analysis were used to determine the adjusted association between administration of HES and AKI.

RESULTS

Of the cohort, 95 patients (36.4%) received 6% HES 130/0.4 either intraoperatively or postoperatively. Postoperative AKI occurred in 145 patients (55.5%). The unadjusted odds of AKI was significantly higher in the HES group, when compared to those not receiving HES (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.30-3.80, p = 0.003). In multivariable logistic regression models, modern HES was not associated with significantly increased risk of AKI (adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.41-1.71, p = 0.63). In propensity score match-pairs analysis of 188 patients, the HES group experienced similar adjusted odds of AKI (OR 1.05, CI 95% 0.87-1.27, p = 0.57) and RRT (OR 1.06, CI 95% 0.92-1.22, p = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of modern hydroxyethyl starch 6% HES 130/0.4 was not associated with an increased risk of AKI nor dialysis in this cohort of patients at elevated risk for developing AKI after cardiac surgery.

Fresh frozen plasma attenuates lung injury in a novel model of prolonged hypotensive resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhagic shock remains a leading cause of early death among severely injured in both civilian and military settings. As future military operations will require strategies allowing prolonged field care of the injured, we sought to develop an in vivo model of prolonged hypotensive resuscitation (PHR) and to evaluate the role of plasma-based resuscitation in this model. We hypothesized that resuscitation with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) would mitigate lung injury when compared with Hextend in a rodent model of PHR.

METHODS

Mice underwent laparotomy and hemorrhagic shock (mean arterial blood pressure, 35 ± 5 mm Hg × 90 minutes) followed by PHR with either FFP or Hextend to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure of 55 mm Hg to 60 mm Hg for 6 hours. Sham animals underwent cannulation only. At the end of 6 hours, animals were euthanized, and lung tissue harvested for measurement of histopathologic injury, inflammation and permeability using hematoxylin and eosin staining, myeloperoxidase immunofluorescence staining and Evans Blue dye. Pulmonary syndecan-1 immunostaining was assessed as an indicator of endothelial cell integrity.

RESULTS

All animals in the FFP, Hextend, and sham groups survived to the end of resuscitation. Resuscitation with FFP mitigated lung histopathologic injury compared with Hextend (histologic injury score of 4.38 ± 2.07 vs. 7.5 ± 0.93, scale of 0-9, p = 0.002) and was comparable to shams (histologic injury score of 4.0 ± 1.93, scale of 0-9, p = 0.99). Fresh frozen plasma also reduced lung inflammation (0.116 ± 0.044 vs. 0.308 ± 0.054 relative fluorescence of myeloperoxidase, p = 0.002) and restored pulmonary syndecan-1 (0.514 ± 0.061 vs. 0.059 ± 0.021, relative syndecan-1 fluorescence, p < 0.001) when compared with Hextend. Consistently, FFP mitigated lung hyperpermeability compared with Hextend (7.30 ± 1.34 μg vs. 14.91 ± 5.55 μg Evans blue/100 mg lung tissue, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

We have presented a novel model of PHR of military relevance to the prolonged field care environment. In this model, FFP maintains its pulmonary protective effects using a PHR strategy compared with Hextend, which supports the need for further development and implementation of plasma-based resuscitation in the forward environment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Basic science.

Damage Control Resuscitation in polytrauma patient

Haemorrhagic shock is one of the main causes of mortality in severe polytrauma patients. To increase the survival rates, a combined strategy of treatment known as Damage Control has been developed. The aims of this article are to analyse the actual concept of Damage Control Resuscitation and its three treatment levels, describe the best transfusion strategy, and approach the acute coagulopathy of the traumatic patient as an entity. The potential changes of this therapeutic strategy over the coming years are also described.

Effect of Hydroxyethyl Starch on Outcomes in High-Risk Vascular Surgery Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of using hydroxyethyl starch (HES) for intraoperative fluid therapy on outcomes in high-risk vascular surgery patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Single-center academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included 1,395 adult vascular surgery patients with peripheral vascular disease.

INTERVENTIONS

Retrospective review of hospital databases.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Outcomes were compared between patients who were intraoperatively administered HES (Voluven [Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany] or Pentaspan [Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada]) versus patients who received only crystalloids during their procedure. Logistic regression was used to assess for association between these groups and mortality (in-hospital, 30-day), intensive care unit admission, hemodialysis requirement, vasopressor requirement, and ventilator requirement. Overall, 796 patients had complete fluid records and were included in the analysis. After adjustment for potential confounders, receiving an HES solution was associated with increased likelihood of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-3.80), postoperative requirement for hemodialysis (OR 6.17, 95% CI 1.09-35.10), intensive care unit admission (OR 3.52, 95% CI 2.15-5.74), and mechanical ventilation (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.84-5.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative administration of HES was associated with an increased likelihood of adverse outcomes compared with use of crystalloids alone.