Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma: Diagnosis and management of esophageal injuries

Blunt esophageal injury in the setting of multitrauma: A case report

Blunt esophageal injury is an unusual organ injury that has unclear clinical symptoms due to the overlap of thoracoabdominal trauma in the setting of multiple traumas. The treatment options vary depending on the patient's clinical symptoms, the extent of esophageal damage, and the time from the onset of damage to diagnosis. This article presents a case of a young male patient receiving emergency treatment after a traffic accident. Esophageal perforation was diagnosed through chest computed tomography with contrast injection and oral contrast. The article focuses on imaging characteristics and suggestive signs of blunt esophageal injury in the setting of multitrauma.

Diagnostic approach to penetrating neck trauma: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Diagnostic evaluation of penetrating neck trauma has evolved considerably over the last several decades. The contemporary approach to these injuries is based primarily on clinical signs of injury and multidetector computed tomographic angiography. The neck is evaluated as a unit, rather than relying on the surface anatomy zones in which external injuries are seen to guide the workup of internal injuries. This "no-zone" approach safely spares many patients from negative explorations and unnecessary invasive tests. The purpose of this review is to describe an evidence-based approach to the diagnostic evaluation of penetrating neck trauma, including indications for adjunctive testing beyond physical examination and multidetector computed tomographic angiography.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Literature Synthesis and Expert Opinion; Level V.

Initial management and outcomes of nonmalignant esophageal perforations: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis

BACKGROUND

Management of esophageal perforation includes open surgery, minimally invasive surgery, and endoscopic stent placement. This study analyzed initial treatment and the associated short-term outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample between October 2015 and December 2019 identified adults >18 years with esophageal perforation undergoing an initial nonelective esophageal procedure categorized into either open surgery, minimally invasive surgery, or endoscopic stent placement. Patients with esophageal cancer were excluded. Baseline characteristics and the van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index were identified. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality and postintervention complications. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to compare in-hospital survival.

RESULTS

In total, 3,345 patients met inclusion criteria: the median age was 62 years (interquartile range 50-72 years), and 1,310 (39%) were female. Open procedure was pursued in 2,650 (79%), minimally invasive surgery in 310 (9%), and endoscopic stent placement in 385 (12%) with no differences in van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index or mortality. Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery had a greater proportion of gastrointestinal complications (P = .006); otherwise, there were no differences in postintervention complications. In total, 380 (11%) patients died and were significantly older, with greater van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and had more postintervention complications. Univariable Cox regression identified age (hazard ratio 1.95, P < .001), van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (hazard ratio 1.06, P < .001), stent placement (hazard ratio 1.93, P = .045), and transfer from a health facility (HR 2.40, P = .049) as associated with decreased in-hospital survival. Multivariable Cox regression revealed age (hazard ratio 1.041, P < .001) and van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser comorbidity index (hazard ratio 1.055, P < .001) were associated with decreased in-hospital survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients with esophageal perforation had an 11% in-hospital mortality rate and significant associated complications regardless of intervention. Increasing age and comorbidities are associated with poorer in-hospital survival.

Current aspects in the management of esophageal trauma: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

Trauma-related esophageal injuries (TEIs) are a rare but highly lethal condition. The presentation of TEIs is very diverse depending on the location and mechanism of injury (blunt vs. penetrating), as well as the presence or absence of concurrent injuries. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to delineate the clinical features impacting TEI management. A systematic review of the Medline, Embase, and web of science databases was undertaken for studies reporting on patients with TEIs. A random effects model was employed in the meta-analysis of aggregated data. Eleven studies, incorporating 4605 patients, were included, with a pooled mortality rate of 19% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13-25%). Penetrating injuries were 34% more likely to occur (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.89, P = 0.01), predominantly in the neck compartment. Surgery was employed in 53% of cases (95% CI 32-73%), with 68% of patients having associated injuries (95% CI 43-94%). In terms of choice of surgical repair technique, primary suture repair was most frequently reported, irrespective of injury location. Postoperative drainage was employed in 27% of the cases and was more common following repair of thoracic esophageal injuries. The estimated dependence on mechanical ventilation was 5.91 days (95% CI 5.1-6.72 days), while the length of stay in the intensive care unit averaged 7.89 days (95% CI 7.14-8.65 days). TEIs are uncommon injuries in trauma patients, associated with considerable mortality and morbidity. Open suture repair of ensuing esophageal defects is by large the most employed approach, while stenting may be indicated in carefully selected cases.

A Penetrating Neck Injury Resulting in the Complete Transection of the Ipsilateral Common Carotid Artery, Delayed Contralateral Pneumothorax, and Occult Esophageal Injury: A Case Report With a Multidisciplinary Approach to Management

A 29-year-old male presented with a zone one penetrating neck injury resulting in complete transection of the left carotid sheath and its contents. The proximal common carotid artery and internal jugular vein injuries were successfully managed with vessel ligation without adverse neurological sequelae. The patient also developed a contralateral pneumothorax, which was due to an occult through-and-through esophageal injury at the junction of the cervical and thoracic esophagus. The esophageal injury was successfully managed with surgical repair and wide drainage of the neck and right chest.

Isolated Blowout Distal Esophageal Injury From Blunt Thoraco-Abdominal Trauma Following Airbag Deployment in an Unrestrained Driver: A Case Report

Esophageal perforation from blunt trauma is rare. It is more frequently encountered in a penetrative mechanism where the cervical esophagus is most commonly injured. Blunt esophageal injury is challenging to diagnose with nonspecific findings clinically and radiologically within trauma settings. The main factors contributing to difficulty in early recognition are its scarce occurrence combined with nonspecific manifestations clinically on patient examination and radiologically on usual trauma computed tomography with intravenous contrast. We report a case of a 15-year-old young man who sustained an isolated distal blowout esophageal perforation as a result of blunt thoraco-abdominal trauma. Despite early primary surgical repair, a leak developed later on, which was managed with stent placement. The leak and associated sepsis were resolved, with an overall status improvement and no subsequent complications. We report an unusual presentation of esophageal perforation from blunt trauma, which was promptly diagnosed and managed with multiple modalities. This case highlights the importance of early recognition and management of esophageal injury and, furthermore, the role of multiple diagnostic and therapeutic modalities that lead to a successful outcome.

Operative Management of Aerodigestive Injuries: Improved Survival Over two Decades

INTRODUCTION

Non-iatrogenic aerodigestive injuries are infrequent but potentially fatal. We hypothesize that advances in management and adoption of innovative therapies resulted in improved survival.

METHODS

Trauma registry review at a university Level 1 center from 2000 to 2020 that identified adults with aerodigestive injuries requiring operative or endoluminal intervention. Demographics, injuries, operations, and outcomes were abstracted. Univariate analysis was performed, P < .05 was statistically significant.

RESULTS

95 patients had 105 injuries: 68 tracheal and 37 esophageal (including 10 combined). Mean age 30.9 (± 14), 87.4% male, 82.1% penetrating, and 28.4% with vascular injuries. Median ISS, chest AIS, admission BP, Shock Index, and lactate were 26 (16-34), 4 (3-4), 132 (113-149) mmHg, .8 (.7-1.1), and 3.1 (2.4-5.6) mmol/L, respectively. There were 46 cervical and 22 thoracic airway injuries; 5 patients in extremis required preoperative ECMO. 66 airway injuries were surgically repaired and 2 definitively managed with endobronchial stents. There were 24 cervical, 11 thoracic, 2 abdominal esophageal injuries-all repaired surgically. Combined tracheoesophageal injuries were individually managed and buttressed. 4 airway complications were successfully managed, and 11 esophageal complications managed conservatively, stented, or resected. Mortality was 9.6%, half from intraoperative hemorrhage. Specific mortality: tracheobronchial 8.8%, esophageal 10.8%, and combined 20%. Mortality was significantly associated with higher ISS (P = .01), vascular injury (P = .007), blunt mechanism (P = .01), bronchial injury (P = .01), and years 2000-2010 (P = .03), but not combined tracheobronchial injury.

CONCLUSION

Mortality is associated with several variables, including vascular trauma and years 2000-2010. The use of ECMO and endoluminal stents in highly selected patients and institutional experience may account for 97.8% survival over the past decade.

Esophageal emergencies

The esophagus is a deeply located organ which traverses the neck, the thorax, and the abdomen and is surrounded at each level by vital organs. Because of its positioning injuries to the esophagus are rare. Their common denominator is the risk of the organ perforation leading to spillage of digestive contents in surrounding spaces, severe sepsis and eventually death. Most frequent esophageal emergencies are related to the ingestion of foreign bodies or caustic agents, to iatrogenic or spontaneous esophageal perforation and external esophageal trauma. Early diagnosis and appropriate management are the keys of successful outcomes.

Successful management of 72-h delay-detected blunt esophageal injury with trans-gastric primary repair; a case report and literature review

Diagnosis of blunt esophageal injury is currently a challenging issue. Early surgical interventions still play as the mainstay of treatment. There was no consensus about appropriate treatment options. However, it was potential morbidity if delayed management. We report a 33-year-old man with a history of a motorcycle accident who presented with hematemesis and epigastrium pain. He was initially diagnosed with left pneumohemothorax and low-grade gastric injury. The patient developed a high-grade fever with complex left pneumohemothorax 72-h after admission. The diagnostic studies revealed a lower esophageal rupture. He was treated with trans-gastric primary repair and recovered well with no complications. We propose the trans-gastric intraluminal repair is one of the surgical options in a blunt lower esophageal rupture.

Advanced diagnostic and therapeutic techniques for anaesthetists in thoracic trauma: an evidence-based review

Anaesthetists play an important role in the evaluation and treatment of patients with signs of thoracic trauma. Anaesthesia involvement can provide valuable input using both advanced diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Commonly performed interventions may be complicated in this setting including airway management, damage control resuscitation, and acute pain management. Anaesthetists must consider additional factors including airway injuries, vascular injuries, and coagulopathy when treating this population. This evidence-based review discusses traumatic thoracic injuries with a focus on new interventions and modern anaesthesia techniques. This review further serves to support the early involvement of anaesthetists in the emergency department and other areas where they can provide value to the trauma care pathway.

The battle trauma of the esophagus

Objective. Estimation of efficacy of diagnosis and methods of treatment in patients, suffering the battle trauma of the esophagus. Materials and methods. In the Division of Thoraco–Abdominal Surgery of the Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology the treatment of 7 patients with penetrating esophageal wounds was conducted. In 6 (85.7%) patients the penetrating gun–shot woundings were diagnosed, and in 1 (14.3%) patient – the closed thoracic trauma. Shrapnel woundings prevailed over the bullet woundings, occurring in5 (71.4%) and 2 (28.6%) patients, accordingly. Esophageal trauma as isolated affection, caused by the gun–shot penetraiting wounding was extremely rare – in 1 (14.3%) patient. Efficacy of diagnosis and surgical stationary treatment of esophageal trauma, caused by foreign bodies, was estimated, as well as the terms of the esophagus integrity restoration. Results. In 2 (2.6%) patients with pleural empyema open toracotomy access with further pleurectomy, pulmonary decortication, and restoration of the esophageal wall integrity was applied. In 4 (57.2%) patients thoracoscopy, pleurectomy, pulmonary decortication, and esophageal suturing were conducted. Intraoperatively in 6 (85.7%) patients the endoscopic vacuum therapy system was installed locally in the damaged esophagus portion. In 1 (14.3%) patient with local pleural empyema the treatment tactics consisted of the pleural cavity drainage under ultrasonographic control plus endoscopic vacuum therapy. For achievement of its optimal efficacy the pressure value was supported in range from 100 to 120 mm Hg. Endoscopic vacuum system was changed every 4 – 5 days. Average duration of the fistulas healing have constituted 1mo.

Primary repair: damage control surgery in esophageal trauma

Esophageal trauma is a rare but life-threatening event associated with high morbidity and mortality. An inadvertent esophageal perforation can rapidly contaminate the neck, mediastinum, pleural space, or abdominal cavity, resulting in sepsis or septic shock. Higher complications and mortality rates are commonly associated with adjacent organ injuries and/or delays in diagnosis or definitive management. This article aims to delineate the experience obtained by the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) of Cali, Colombia, on the surgical management of esophageal trauma following damage control principles. Esophageal injuries should always be suspected in thoracoabdominal or cervical trauma when the trajectory or mechanism suggests so. Hemodynamically stable patients should be radiologically evaluated before a surgical correction, ideally with computed tomography of the neck, chest, and abdomen. While hemodynamically unstable patients should be immediately transferred to the operating room for direct surgical control. A primary repair is the surgical management of choice in all esophageal injuries, along with endoscopic nasogastric tube placement and immediate postoperative care in the intensive care unit. We propose an easy-to-follow surgical management algorithm that sticks to the philosophy of "Less is Better" by avoiding esophagostomas.

A Review of "Options in Management of Trauma to the Esophagus" (1982) "Submitted for the Literary Festschrift in Honor of J. David Richardson, MD"

This article is an update of a paper which Dave Richardson and I published in 1982, and serves as both an update of management of esophageal injuries and as a lasting tribute to my mentor and hero J. David Richardson.

Thoracic esophageal rupture during sleeve gastrectomy: a case report with successful laparoscopic transhiatal repair

While laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most common bariatric procedures for morbid obesity, the rate of complications is decreasing. These complications include hemorrhage and gastric leak that are considered life threatening. The esophageal complications in the form of perforation or rupture during LSG are rare and mainly because of iatrogenic reasons, such as blind, unguided instrumentation, which include the bougie (commonly used for gastric calibration during LSG). These complications are potential life threatening. The detection and management of these complications can affect the outcome and minimize the morbidity and avoid the incidence of mortality. We report a case of 38-year-old female, with a body mass index of 42 with iatrogenic rupture of distal and thoracic part of esophagus for >10-cm length during LSG and the immediate full laparoscopic transhiatal primary repair.

Esophageal emergencies: WSES guidelines

The esophagus traverses three body compartments (neck, thorax, and abdomen) and is surrounded at each level by vital organs. Injuries to the esophagus may be classified as foreign body ingestion, caustic ingestion, esophageal perforation, and esophageal trauma. These lesions can be life-threatening either by digestive contamination of surrounding structures in case of esophageal wall breach or concomitant damage of surrounding organs. Early diagnosis and timely therapeutic intervention are the keys of successful management.

Treatment of Synchronous Traumatic Perforations of the Trachea and the Esophagus With Two Inferiorly Based Strap Muscle Interposition Flaps: An Innovative Approach

: Traumatic perforations of the esophagus and trachea are devastating injuries that necessitate prompt treatment. Large defects benefit from coverage with well vascularized tissue. Injuries at the level of the thoracic inlet are more challenging, as the options for local tissue coverage are limited.This report describes the case of a 24-year-old male who suffered gunshot wounds to his neck resulting in right posterolateral tracheal perforation as well as esophageal perforation at the level of the thoracic inlet. Bronchoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed injury of the trachea at 19 cm from the incisors and 2 large defects of the anterior and posterior esophagus at 26 cm. The esophageal defects were temporized with a stent at a first stage. Plastic surgery team was then consulted for flap coverage of the defects.The thoracic team exposed the tracheal and esophageal perforations with a j-type incision of the neck, extending to the sternal notch, and the esophageal stent was removed. The 2 muscles, sternohyoid (SH) and sternothyroid (ST), were dissected free and were inferiorly rotated after they were disinserted superiorly. The SH was placed between the trachea and the esophagus, and the ST between the esophagus and the spine.Postoperative, the patient was receiving nutrition via a gastrostomy tube. An esophagogram was performed on postoperative day (POD) # 7, which showed no esophageal leak. Postoperative diet was started and the patient was discharged on POD# 10 in a good condition. Twelve months postoperative, his wounds were found to be intact, and had no trouble either with breathing or swallowing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: V.

Management of traumatic esophageal injuries

Traumatic esophageal perforations are rare but difficult to treat injuries. We review the principles of work-up, anatomy and treatment of cervical, thoracic and abdominal traumatic esophageal perforations. Management is dictated by location of the perforation and any concurrent injuries. The majority of cases are amenable to primary repair with flap re-enforcement. Other principles include adequate drainage around the repair, decompression of the esophagus and stomach (via nasogastric tube or gastrostomy tube) and distal enteral nutrition (feeding jejunostomy).

The golden year: How functional recovery sets the stage for tendon transfer surgery among patients with tetraplegia-a qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Tendon transfer surgery can effectively improve hand function for patients with tetraplegia but remains poorly utilized. Little is known regarding how patients' rehabilitation experiences influence their perception of function, identity, and coping to shape their reconstructive context.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional qualitative analysis of 19 participants with C4-C7 cervical spinal injuries: 9 patients had undergone reconstruction; 10 had not. Semistructured interviews were conducted using an interview guide focusing on rehabilitation experience, the relationship between function and identity, and how patient experience evolved. Interview transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory.

RESULTS

The study sample was predominantly male (79%), white (89%), and American Spinal Injury Association grades A-D (grade A: 42%; grade B: 32%; grade C: 16%; grade D: 10%). Recognizing rehabilitation's necessity, functional gains, and constructive patient-therapist relationships promoted engagement in therapy. Poor insurance coverage and financial constraints decreased rehabilitation access. Function affected identity through the degree to which it tied participants to a "patient" role. Early in recovery, patients' function, roles, and attitudes were fluid but solidified over time; how satisfied patients were with these final positions influenced how they coped.

CONCLUSION

The balance of patients' positive and negative coping has been found to influence patients' progression to surgery. This study describes how function and identity contribute to coping. Participants' function and identity evolved during a finite period we call "the golden year," before reaching a fixed point around which they built their lives. The norms patients establish during this time may affect receptiveness to surgery.

Chinese expert consensus on echelons treatment of thoracic injury in modern warfare

The emergency treatment of thoracic injuries varies of general conditions and modern warfare. However, there are no unified battlefield treatment guidelines for thoracic injuries in the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA). An expert consensus has been reached based on the epidemiology of thoracic injuries and the concept of battlefield treatment combined with the existing levels of military medical care in modern warfare. Since there are no differences in the specialized treatment for thoracic injuries between general conditions and modern warfare, first aid, emergency treatment, and early treatment of thoracic injuries are introduced separately in three levels in this consensus. At Level I facilities, tension pneumothorax and open pneumothorax are recommended for initial assessment during the first aid stage. Re-evaluation and further treatment for hemothorax, flail chest, and pericardial tamponade are recommended at Level II facilities. At Level III facilities, simple surgical operations such as emergency thoracotomy and debridement surgery for open pneumothorax are recommended. The grading standard for evidence evaluation and recommendation was used to reach this expert consensus.

Primary repair of a delayed presentation thoracic oesophageal gunshot injury: A report of two cases

Thoracic oesophageal gunshot injuries are uncommon, and the morbidity and mortality rates are extremely high and depend on the elapsed time, injury severity, and concomitant organ damage. Thus, early diagnosis is paramount to avoid delays, which in turn confer poorer outcomes. Current management strategies are still controversial and depend on the patient's physiologic state. We experienced two cases of thoracic oesophageal gunshot injury, both of whom were treated by primary repair and were successfully discharged. Decision-making strategies should be based on the patient's physiologic reserve, experience of the attending surgical team, and ancillary services available at the facility.

Perforated esophageal intervention focus (PERF) study: a multi-center examination of contemporary treatment

The treatment of esophageal perforation (EP) remains a significant clinical challenge. While a number of investigators have previously documented efficient approaches, these were mostly single-center experiences reported prior to the introduction of newer technologies: specifically endoluminal stents. This study was designed to document contemporary practice in the diagnosis and management of EP at multiple institutions around the world and includes early clinical outcomes. A five-year (2009-2013) multicenter retrospective review of management and outcomes for patients with thoracic or abdominal esophageal perforation was conducted. Demographics, etiology, diagnostic modalities, treatments, subsequent early outcomes as well as morbidity and mortality were captured and analyzed. During the study period, 199 patients from 10 centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe were identified. Mechanisms of perforation included Boerhaave syndrome (60, 30.1%), iatrogenic injury (65, 32.6%), and penetrating trauma (25, 12.6%). Perforation was isolated to the thoracic segment alone in 124 (62.3%), with 62 (31.2%) involving the thoracoabdominal esophagus. Mean perforation length was 2.5 cm. Observation was selected as initial management in 65 (32.7%), with only two failures. Direct operative intervention was initial management in 65 patients (32.6%), while 29 (14.6%) underwent esophageal stent coverage. Compared to operative intervention, esophageal stent patients were significantly more likely to be older (61.3 vs. 48.3 years old, P < 0.001) and have sustained iatrogenic mechanisms of esophageal perforation (48.3% vs.15.4%). Secondary intervention requirement for patients with perforation was 33.7% overall (66). Complications included sepsis (56, 28.1%), pneumonia (34, 17.1%) and multi-organ failure (23, 11.6%). Overall mortality was 15.1% (30). In contemporary practice, diagnostic and management approaches to esophageal perforation vary widely. Despite the introduction of endoluminal strategies, it continues to carry a high risk of mortality, morbidity, and need for secondary intervention. A concerted multi-institutional, prospectively collected database is ideal for further investigation.

Management of esophageal injuries secondary to trauma

Traumatic esophageal injuries occur less than 10% of the time in the setting of blunt or penetrating trauma. The purpose of this literature review is to provide an update on the most recent changes involving the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal injuries. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, to identify articles written in English language with the terms "non- iatrogenic", "esophageal", "trauma", "diagnosis", "management", and "prognosis". Case reports and articles involving non-traumatic esophageal perforations were excluded. Fifty pertinent articles in English language from 1947 to 2015 were selected for review. Based on the review of all articles, we designed a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm to facilitate the diagnosis and management of the traumatic esophageal injury.

Non-iatrogenic esophageal injury: a retrospective analysis from the National Trauma Data Bank

BACKGROUND

Traumatic, non-iatrogenic esophageal injuries, despite their rarity, are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The optimal management of these esophageal perforations remains largely debated. To date, only a few small case series are available with contrasting results. The purpose of this study was to examine a large contemporary experience with traumatic esophageal injury management and to analyze risk factors associated with mortality.

METHODS

This National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) database study included patients with non-iatrogenic esophageal injuries. Variables abstracted were demographics, comorbidities, mechanism of injury, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), esophageal Organ Injury Scale (OIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), level of injury, vital signs, and treatment. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent predictors for mortality and overall complications.

RESULTS

A total of 944 patients with non-iatrogenic esophageal injury were included in the final analysis. The cervical segment of the esophagus was injured in 331 (35%) patients. The unadjusted 24-h mortality (8.2 vs. 14%, p = 0.008), 30-day mortality (4.2 vs. 9.3%, p = 0.005), and overall mortality (7.9 vs. 13.5%, p = 0.009) were significantly lower in the group of patients with a cervical injury. The overall complication rate was also lower in the cervical group (19.8 vs. 27.1%, p = 0.024). Multilogistic regression analysis identified age >50, thoracic injury, high-grade esophageal injury (OIS IV-V), hypotension on admission, and GCS <9 as independent risk factors associated with increased mortality. Treatment within the first 24 h was found to be protective (OR 0.284; 95% CI, 0.148-0.546; p < 0.001). Injury to the thoracic esophagus was also an independent risk factor for overall complications (OR 1.637; 95% CI, 1.06-2.53; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improvements in surgical technique and critical care support, the overall mortality for traumatic esophageal injury remains high. The presence of a thoracic esophageal injury and extensive esophageal damage are the major independent risk factors for mortality. Early surgical treatment, within the first 24 h of admission, is associated with improved survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

iStar, HS-16-00883.