Prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in pediatric trauma: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma and the Pediatric Trauma Society

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in High-Risk Pediatric Trauma Patients

Importance

The indications, safety, and efficacy of chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (cVTE) in pediatric trauma patients remain unclear. A set of high-risk criteria to guide cVTE use was recently recommended; however, these criteria have not been evaluated prospectively.

Objective

To examine high-risk criteria and cVTE use in a prospective multi-institutional study of pediatric trauma patients.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study was completed between October 2019 and October 2022 in 8 free-standing pediatric hospitals designated as American College of Surgeons level I pediatric trauma centers. Participants were pediatric trauma patients younger than 18 years who met defined high-risk criteria on admission. It was hypothesized that cVTE would be safe and reduce the incidence of VTE.

Exposures

Receipt and timing of chemical VTE prophylaxis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was overall VTE rate stratified by receipt and timing of cVTE. The secondary outcome was safety of cVTE as measured by bleeding or other complications from anticoagulation.

Results

Among 460 high-risk pediatric trauma patients, the median (IQR) age was 14.5 years (10.4-16.2 years); 313 patients (68%) were male and 147 female (32%). The median (IQR) Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 23 (16-30), and median (IQR) number of high-risk factors was 3 (2-4). A total of 251 (54.5%) patients received cVTE; 62 (13.5%) received cVTE within 24 hours of admission. Patients who received cVTE after 24 hours had more high-risk factors and higher ISS. The most common reason for delayed cVTE was central nervous system bleed (120 patients; 30.2%). There were 28 VTE events among 25 patients (5.4%). VTE occurred in 1 of 62 patients (1.6%) receiving cVTE within 24 hours, 13 of 189 patients (6.9%) receiving cVTE after 24 hours, and 11 of 209 (5.3%) who had no cVTE (P = .31). Increasing time between admission and cVTE initiation was significantly associated with VTE (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; P = .01). No bleeding complications were observed while patients received cVTE.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this prospective study, use of cVTE based on a set of high-risk criteria was safe and did not lead to bleeding complications. Delay to initiation of cVTE was significantly associated with development of VTE. Quality improvement in pediatric VTE prevention may center on timing of prophylaxis and barriers to implementation.

Variability in Standardized Mortality Rates Among Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Trauma Centers

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes significant morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients and care is highly variable. Standardized mortality ratio (SMR) summarizes the mortality rate of a specific center relative to the expected rates across all centers, adjusted for case-mix. This study aimed to evaluate variations in SMRs among pediatric trauma centers for TBI.

METHODS

Patients aged 1-18 diagnosed with TBI within the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2017 to 2019 were included. Center-specific SMRs and 95% confidence intervals identified centers with mortality rates significantly better or worse than the median SMR for all centers.

RESULTS

316 centers with 10,598 patients were included. SMRs were risk-adjusted for patient risk factors. Unadjusted mortality ranged from 16.5 to 29.5%. Three centers (1.5%) had significantly better SMR (SMR <1) and three centers (1.5%) had significantly worse SMR (SMR >1). Significantly better centers had a lower proportion of neurosurgical intervention (2.4% vs. 11.8%, p < 0.001), a higher proportion of supplemental oxygen administration (93.7% vs. 83.5%, p = 0.004) and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (53.2% vs. 40.6%, p < 0.001) compared to significantly worse centers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified centers that have significantly higher and lower mortality rates for pediatric TBI patients relative to the overall median rate. These data provide a benchmark for pediatric TBI outcomes and institutional quality improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective Comparative Study.

Screening and Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Pediatric Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee conducted a systematic review to describe the epidemiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric surgical and trauma patients and develop recommendations for screening and prophylaxis.

METHODS

The Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were queried from January 2000 through December 2021. Search terms addressed the following topics: incidence, ultrasound screening, and mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Consensus recommendations were derived based on the best available literature.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four studies were included. The incidence of VTE in pediatric surgical populations is 0.29% (Range = 0.1%-0.48%) and directly correlates with surgery type, transfusion, prolonged anesthesia, malignancy, congenital heart disease, inflammatory bowel disease, infection, and female sex. The incidence of VTE in pediatric trauma populations is 0.25% (Range = 0.1%-0.8%) and directly correlates with injury severity, major surgery, central line placement, body mass index, spinal cord injury, and length-of-stay. Routine ultrasound screening for VTE is not recommended. Consider sequential compression devices in at-risk nonmobile, pediatric surgical patients when an appropriate sized device is available. Consider mechanical prophylaxis alone or with pharmacologic prophylaxis in adolescents >15 y and post-pubertal children <15 y with injury severity scores >25. When utilizing pharmacologic prophylaxis, low molecular weight heparin is superior to unfractionated heparin.

CONCLUSIONS

While VTE remains an infrequent complication in children, consideration of mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis is appropriate in certain populations.

TYPE OF STUDY

Systematic Review of level 2-4 studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3-4.

Uncovering Risk Factors and Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism in a Nationwide Cohort of Hospitalized Children

PURPOSE

The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in hospitalized children has increased in recent years. This study sought to characterize factors and outcomes associated with PE using a national pediatric cohort.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried (2016-2018) for patients (<18 years) with a diagnosis of PE. Index and prior hospitalizations (PHs) within 1 year were analyzed. A binary logistic regression utilizing 37 covariates (demographics, procedures, comorbidities, etc.) was constructed to examine a primary outcome of in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

3440 patients were identified (57% female) with the majority >12 years old (77%). One-third had a known deep vein thrombosis (69% lower and 31% upper extremity). Nineteen percent underwent central venous catheter (CVC) placement. Twenty-one percent had a PH within 1 year. Nine percent underwent an operation with the majority being cardiothoracic (5%). Overall mortality was 5%. Neurocranial surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, and CVC placement were associated with the highest odds of inpatient mortality after logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients with PE have a high rate of PHs, CVC placement, and inpatient operations, which may be associated with higher mortality. This information can be utilized to improve screening measures and clinical suspicion for PE in hospitalized children.

Plasma thrombin generation kinetics vary by injury pattern and resuscitation characteristics in pediatric and young adult trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Thrombin generation kinetics are not well studied in children. This study aimed to assess how thrombin generation kinetics vary in pediatric and young adult (YA) trauma patients by clinical characteristics and injury pattern.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study where plasma samples were obtained from pediatric (ages 0-17 years) and YA (ages 18-21 years) trauma patients upon emergency department arrival. Thrombin generation (calibrated automated thrombogram [CAT]) was quantified as lag time (LT, minutes), peak height (PH, nM), time to peak (ttPeak, minutes), and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP, nM × minute). Results are expressed as median and quartiles [Q1, Q3] and compared using Wilcoxon rank sum testing with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

We enrolled 47 pediatric (median age, 15 [14, 17] years, 78% male, 87% blunt, median Injury Severity Score, 12) and 49 YA (median age 20 [18, 21] years, 67% male, 84% blunt, median Injury Severity Score, 12) patients. Pediatric and YA patients had similar rates of operative intervention (51% vs. 57%), transfusion (25% vs. 20%), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) (53% vs. 49%). Pediatric patients who required an operation had accelerated initiation of thrombin generation, with shorter LT than those who did not (2.58 [2.33, 2.67]; 2.92 [2.54, 3.00], p = 0.034). Shorter LT (2.41 [2.22, 2.67]; 2.67 [2.53, 3.00]) and ttPeak (4.50 [4.23, 4.73]; 5.22 [4.69, 5.75], both p < 0.01) were noted in pediatric patients who required transfusion as compared with those who did not. The YA patients requiring transfusion had shorter LT (2.33 [2.19, 2.74]; 2.83 [2.67, 3.27]) and ttPeak (4.48 [4.33, 5.65]; 5.33 [4.85, 6.28] both p < 0.04) than those who were not transfused. Young adults with TBI had greater ETP than those without (1509 [1356, 1671]; 1284 [1154, 1471], p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Thrombin generation kinetics in pediatric trauma patients prior to intervention vary with need for operation and transfusion, while thrombin generation kinetics in young adult patients are influenced by TBI and need for operation or transfusion. This is a promising tool for assessing coagulopathy in young trauma patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Impact of institutional prophylaxis guidelines on rates of pediatric venous thromboembolism following trauma-A multicenter study from the pediatric trauma society research committee

BACKGROUND

A paucity of data exists with regard to the incidence, management, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in injured children. We sought to determine the impact of institutional chemoprophylaxis guidelines on VTE rates in a pediatric trauma population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of injured children (≤15 years) admitted between 2009 and 2018 at 10 pediatric trauma centers was performed. Data were gathered from institutional trauma registries and dedicated chart review. The institutions were surveyed as to whether they had chemoprophylaxis guidelines in place for high-risk pediatric trauma patients, and outcomes were compared based on the presence of guidelines using χ 2 analysis ( p < 0.05).

RESULTS

There were 45,202 patients evaluated during the study period. Three institutions (28,359 patients, 63%) had established chemoprophylaxis policies during the study period ("Guidelines"); the other seven centers (16,843 patients, 37%) had no such guidelines ("Standard"). There were significantly lower rates of VTE in the Guidelines group, but these patients also had significantly fewer risk factors. Among critically injured children with similar clinical presentations, there was no difference in VTE rate. Specifically within the Guidelines group, 30 children developed VTE. The majority (17/30) were actually not indicated for chemoprophylaxis based on institutional guidelines. Still, despite protocols only one VTE patient in the guidelines group who was indicated for intervention ended up receiving chemoprophylaxis prior to diagnosis. No consistent ultrasound screening protocol was in place at any institution during the study.

CONCLUSION

The presence of an institutional policy to guide chemoprophylaxis for injured children is associated with a decreased overall frequency of VTE, but this disappears when controlling for patient factors. However, the overall efficacy is impacted by a combination of deficits in guideline compliance and structure. Further prospective data are needed to help determine the ideal role for chemoprophylaxis and protocols in pediatric trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Thromboprophylaxis in pediatric patients with earthquake-related crush syndrome: a single centre experience

PURPOSE

Injuries increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the literature on the management of anticoagulant therapy in pediatric patients with crush injury is limited. In this study, we aimed to share our experience about anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in pediatric patients with earthquake-related crush syndrome.

METHODS

This study included patients who were evaluated for VTE risk after the Turkey-Syria earthquake in 2023. Since there is no specific pediatric guideline for the prevention of VTE in trauma patients, risk assessment for VTE and decision for thromboprophylaxis was made by adapting the guideline for the prevention of perioperative VTE in adolescent patients.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients [25 males and 24 females] with earthquake-related crush syndrome had participated in the study. The median age of the patients was 13.5 (8.8-15.5) years. Seven patients (14.6%) who had no risk factors for thrombosis were considered to be at low risk and did not receive thromboprophylaxis. Thirteen patients (27.1%) with one risk factor for thrombosis were considered to be at moderate risk and 28 patients (58.3%) with two or more risk factors for thrombosis were considered to be at high risk. Moderate-risk patients (n = 8) and high-risk patients aged < 13 years (n = 11) received prophylactic enoxaparin if they could not be mobilized early, while all high-risk patients aged ≥ 13 years (n = 13) received prophylactic enoxaparin.

CONCLUSION

With the decision-making algorithm for thyromboprophylaxis we used, we observed a VTE rate of 2.1% in pediatric patients with earthquake-related crush syndrome.

Rehabilitation Care of the Child with an Acute Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) represent a unique and evolving population. Recovery and long-term prognosis are variable given the heterogeneity of ages, developmental stages, and types of injuries. This article summarizes important information regarding severe TBI epidemiology, pathophysiology, classification, and acute management. Early and longitudinal involvement of rehabilitation experts, such as pediatric physiatrists, is critical in managing complications and optimizing outcomes.

Management of venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients: Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines and variations in recommendations

INTRODUCTION

We performed a quality assessment and comparison of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients and to provide a clinical reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic databases, guideline development organizations, and professional societies were searched to identify CPGs for VTE in pediatric patients between January 1, 2012, and April 7, 2022. The Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was used to evaluate quality. Recommendations for preventing and treating VTE in pediatric patients were extracted via descriptive synthesis.

RESULTS

Six CPGs were included. The median scores (interquartile range [IQR]) for each AGREE II domain were as follows: scope and purpose, 88.89 % (IQR: 8.33 %); stakeholder involvement, 88.89 % (25 %); rigor of development, 67.71 % (24.47 %); clarity and presentation, 88.89 % (0 %); applicability, 50 % (42.71 %); and editorial independence, 66.67 % (50.00 %). In total, 268 key recommendations were extracted, and traditional anticoagulants (heparin and warfarin) remain the standard treatment. However, in recent years direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown similar efficacy and safety results for the treatment of VTE in children to those reported in adults; therefore, this practice is recommended in recent guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability exists in the development and reporting of CPGs for VTE in pediatric patients. There may be changes to the recommendations for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pediatrics in the future due to the efficacy of DOACs in children, and recommendations should be revised periodically as new evidence emerges.

Derivation and Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in Injured Children

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes significant morbidity in pediatric trauma patients. We applied machine learning algorithms to the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database to develop and validate a risk prediction model for VTE in injured children.

METHODS

Patients ≤18 years were identified from TQIP (2017-2019, n = 383,814). Those administered VTE prophylaxis ≤24 h and missing the outcome (VTE) were removed (n = 347,576). Feature selection identified 15 predictors: intubation, need for supplemental oxygen, spinal injury, pelvic fractures, multiple long bone fractures, major surgery (neurosurgery, thoracic, orthopedic, vascular), age, transfusion requirement, intracranial pressure monitor or external ventricular drain placement, and low Glasgow Coma Scale score. Data was split into training (n = 251,409) and testing (n = 118,175) subsets. Machine learning algorithms were trained, tested, and compared.

RESULTS

Low-risk prediction: For the testing subset, all models outperformed the baseline rate of VTE (0.15%) with a predicted rate of 0.01-0.02% (p < 2.2e^-16). 88.4-89.4% of patients were classified as low risk by the models.

HIGH-RISK PREDICTION

All models outperformed baseline with a predicted rate of VTE ranging from 1.13 to 1.32% (p < 2.2e^-16). The performance of the 3 models was not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

We developed a predictive model that differentiates injured children for development of VTE with high discrimination and can guide prophylaxis use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, Level II.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective, Cross-sectional.

Venous thromboembolic screening in pediatric trauma: A prospective cohort study of risk-stratified ultrasonography

BACKGROUND

This prospective observational cohort study evaluates risk-stratified venous thromboembolism (VTE) screening in injured children. While the reported incidence of VTE is 6% to 10% among critically injured children, there is no standard for screening. Venous thromboembolism may have long-term sequelae in children, including postthrombotic syndrome.

METHODS

Patients admitted to a level 1 pediatric trauma center were risk stratified for VTE using a validated prediction algorithm. Children at high risk (risk scores ≥523; i.e., ≥1% risk) received screening duplex ultrasonography. Children at moderate risk (risk scores 410-522; i.e., 0.3-0.99% risk) were screened as a comparison/control.

RESULTS

Three-hundred fifty-five children were consecutively risk stratified from October 2019 to May 2021. Forty-seven children received screening duplex ultrasounds: 21 from a high-risk cohort and 26 from a moderate-risk cohort. Four children were diagnosed with VTE in the high-risk cohort compared with seven in the moderate-risk cohort ( p = 0.53). Total incidence of VTE among screened children was 23.4% (11 of 47). Asymptomatic VTE accounted for 81.8% of all events (9 of 11). Fifty-four percent (6 of 11) of VTE were central venous catheter associated. Venous thromboembolism in surviving children resolved by 3 to 6 months with no symptoms of postthrombotic syndrome after 1 year. No cases of VTE were identified in unscreened children, yielding an institutional VTE incidence of 3.1% (11 of 355).

DISCUSSION

Risk-stratified screening demonstrates a significant incidence of asymptomatic VTE in injured children. These results may guide reevaluation of prediction algorithms developed from symptomatic VTE risk and longitudinal study of the sequelae of asymptomatic VTE.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Use of Pharmacologic Prophylaxis Against Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Injured Children

Despite a practice management guideline and risk prediction model for venous thromboembolism (VTE), pediatric-specific evidence on pharmacologic prophylaxis is lacking. In a retrospective study, we characterized receipt of prophylaxis and explored its effectiveness in hospitalized injured patients below 18 years old using data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Concordance of receipt of prophylaxis with guideline and predicted risk of VTE was estimated using κ statistic. Effectiveness was explored using cohorts matched based on the risk prediction model. A total of 11,165 (6.2%) of 180,932 patients received prophylaxis. Those who received prophylaxis were more commonly post-pubertal and more severely injured. Receipt of prophylaxis was fairly concordant with the guideline (κ=0.32) and predicted risk of VTE (κ=0.29). Receipt of prophylaxis was associated with higher rates of VTE likely due to confounding by indication. Low molecular weight heparin seemed more effective against VTE than unfractionated heparin (incidence rate ratio: 0.52; 95% confidence interval: 0.36, 0.75), but less effective when received ≥72 hours after admission to the hospital. We showed that hospitalized injured children did not commonly receive prophylaxis. We also showed that prophylaxis may be effective in hospitalized injured children, but it needs to be proven definitively in a randomized clinical trial.

Venous thromboembolic risk stratification in pediatric trauma: A Pediatric Trauma Society Research Committee multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in injured children is rare, but its consequences are significant. Several risk stratification algorithms for VTE in pediatric trauma exist with little consensus, and all are hindered in development by relying on registry data with known inaccuracies. We performed a multicenter review to evaluate trauma registry fidelity and confirm the effectiveness of one established algorithm across diverse centers.

METHODS

Local trauma registries at 10 institutions were queried for all patients younger than 18 years admitted between 2009 and 2018. Additional chart review was performed on all "VTE" cases and random non-VTE controls to assess registry errors. Corrected data were then applied to our prediction algorithm using 10 real-time variables (Glasgow Coma Scale, age, sex, intensive care unit admission, transfusion, central line placement, lower extremity/pelvic fracture, major surgery) to calculate VTE risk scores. Contingency table classifiers and the area under a receiver operator characteristic curve were calculated.

RESULTS

Registries identified 52,524 pediatric trauma patients with 99 episodes of VTE; however, chart review found that 13 cases were misclassified for a corrected total of 86 cases (0.16%). After correction, the algorithm still displayed strong performance in discriminating VTE-fated encounters (sensitivity, 69%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.96). Furthermore, despite wide institutional variability in VTE rates (0.04-1.7%), the algorithm maintained a specificity of >91% and a negative predictive value of >99.7% across centers. Chart review also revealed that 54% (n = 45) of VTEs were directly associated with a central line, usually femoral (n = 34, p < 0.001 compared with upper extremity), and that prophylaxis rates were underreported in the registries by about 50%; still, only 19% of the VTE cases had been on prophylaxis before diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The VTE prediction algorithm performed well when applied retrospectively across 10 diverse pediatric centers using corrected registry data. These findings can advance initiatives for VTE screening/prophylaxis guidance following pediatric trauma and warrant prospective study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Clinical decision rule evaluated in a single population, level III.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after pediatric trauma

In recent years, there has been an increased focus on developing and validating venous thromboprophylaxis guidelines in the pediatric trauma population. We review the current literature regarding the incidence of and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the use of prophylaxis in the pediatric trauma population. Risk factors such as age, injury severity, central venous catheters, mental status, injury type, surgery, and comorbidities can lead to a higher incidence of VTE. Risk stratification tools have been developed to determine whether mechanical and/or pharmacologic prophylaxis should be implemented depending on the degree of VTE risk. When VTE risk is high, pharmacologic prophylaxis, such as with low molecular weight heparin, is often initiated. However, the timing and duration of VTE prophylaxis is dependent on patient factors including ambulatory status and contraindications such as bleeding. In addition, the utility of screening ultrasound for VTE surveillance has been evaluated and though they are not widely recommended, no formal guidelines exist. While more research has been done in recent years to assess the most appropriate type, timing, and duration of VTE prophylaxis, further studies are warranted to create optimal guidelines for decreasing the risk of VTE after pediatric trauma.

Venous Thromboembolism among Critically Ill Children: A Narrative Review

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients, including children. In recent years, it has become clear that hospitalization and critical illness bestow an increased VTE risk in pediatrics and relate to mortality and life-limiting comorbidities. For critically ill children, reported rates of VTE vary by study sampling techniques, presence of inherited or acquired thrombophilia, acute and chronic immobility, underlying illness prompting hospitalization, and clinical factors related to illness severity such as central venous catheterization, length of stay, mechanical ventilation, and patient age. Accordingly, critically ill children with new signs of venous congestion, acute inflammation, or unexplained acute organ dysfunction should be routinely evaluated for VTE. This narrative review summarizes recent and historical literature regarding risk factors, prevention, presentation, treatment, and outcomes of VTE in critically ill children. In addition, we identify knowledge gaps and priorities for future collaborative research on this vital condition. Special attention is given to the clinical trial opportunities, challenges, and ongoing efforts in thromboprophylaxis in critically ill children, including those hospitalized for disease related to novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and multisystem inflammatory disease in children.

The survival benefit of low molecular weight heparin over unfractionated heparin in pediatric trauma patients

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in pediatric patients is controversial and is mainly dependent on protocols derived from adult practices. Our study aimed to compare outcomes among pediatric trauma patients who received low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) compared to those who received unfractionated heparin (UFH).

METHODS

We performed 2 years (2015-2016) retrospective analysis of the Pediatrics ACS-TQIP database. Pediatric trauma patients (age ≤17) who received thromboprophylaxis with either LMWH or UFH were included. Patients were stratified into three age groups. Analysis of each subgroup and the entire cohort was performed. Outcome measures included VTE events (deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolism [PE]), hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS) among survivors, and mortality. Propensity score matching was used to match the two cohorts LMWH vs UFH.

RESULTS

A matched cohort of 1,678 pediatric trauma patients was analyzed. A significant difference in survival, DVT events, and in-hospital LOS was seen in the age groups above 9 years. Overall, the patients who received LMWH had lower mortality (1.4% vs 3.6%, p<0.01), DVT (1.7% vs 3.7%, p<0.01), and hospital LOS among survivors (7 days vs 9 days, p<0.01) compared to those who received UFH. There was no significant difference in the ICU LOS among survivors and the incidence of PE between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

LMWH is associated with increased survival, lower rates of DVT, and decreased hospital LOS compared to UFH among pediatric trauma patients age 10-17 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III Prophylactic.

STUDY TYPE

Prophylactic.

Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in pediatric traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) has increased significantly. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma recommends using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) over unfractionated heparin (UH) in pediatric patients requiring VTE prophylaxis, although this strategy is unsupported by the literature. In this study, the authors compare the outcomes of pediatric TBI patients receiving LMWH versus UH.

METHODS

The authors performed a 4-year (2014-2017) analysis of the pediatric American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. All trauma patients (age ≤ 18 years) with TBI requiring thromboprophylaxis with UH or LMWH were potentially eligible for inclusion. Patients who had been transferred, had died in the emergency department, or had penetrating trauma were excluded. Patients were stratified into either the LMWH or the UH group on the basis of the prophylaxis they had received. Patients were matched on the basis of demographics, injury characteristics, vital signs, and transfusion requirements using propensity score matching (PSM). The study endpoints were VTE, death, and craniotomy after initiation of prophylaxis. Univariate analysis was performed after PSM to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 2479 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 15.5 ± 3.7 years and 32.0% female), of which 1570 (63.3%) had received LMWH and 909 (36.7%) had received UH. Before PSM, patients receiving UH were younger, had a lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, and had a higher Injury Severity Score. Patients treated in pediatric hospitals were more likely to receive UH (12.9% vs 9.0%, p < 0.001) than patients treated in adult hospitals. Matched patients receiving UH had a higher incidence of VTE (5.1% vs 2.9%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

LMWH prophylaxis in pediatric TBI appears to be more effective than UH in preventing VTE. Large, multicenter prospective studies are warranted to confirm the superiority of LMWH over UH in pediatric patients with TBI. Moreover, outcomes of VTE prophylaxis in the very young remain understudied; therefore, dedicated studies to evaluate this population are needed.

Significant practice variability exists in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in injured children: results from a joint survey of the Pediatric Trauma Society and the Trauma Center Association of America

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to characterize current practices to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children and measure adherence to recent joint consensus guidelines from the Pediatric Trauma Society and Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (PTS/EAST).

METHODS

An 18-question survey was sent to the membership of PTS and the Trauma Center Association of American. Responses were compared with Chi-square test.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-nine members completed the survey. Most respondents were from academic (84.5%), Level 1 pediatric (62.0%) trauma centers. Criteria for VTE prophylaxis varied between hospitals with freestanding pediatric trauma centers significantly more likely to stratify children by risk factors than adult trauma centers (p = 0.020). While awareness of PTS/EAST guidelines (58.7% overall) was not statistically different between hospital types (44% freestanding adult, 52% freestanding pediatric, 71% combined adult pediatric, p = 0.131), self-reported adherence to these guidelines was uniformly low at 37.2% for all respondents. Lastly, in three clinical scenarios, respondents chose VTE screening and prophylaxis plans in accordance with a prospective application of PTS/EAST guidelines 55.0% correctly.

CONCLUSION

Currently no consensus regarding the prevention of VTE in pediatric trauma exists. Prospective application of PTS/EAST guidelines has been limited, likely due to poor quality of evidence and a reliance on post-injury metrics. Results of this survey suggest that further investigation is needed to more clearly define the risk of VTE in children, evaluate, and prospectively validate alternative scoring systems for VTE prevention in injured children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A-Survey.

Validation of a venous thromboembolism prediction algorithm for pediatric trauma: A national trauma data bank (NTDB) analysis

PURPOSE

We sought to validate a risk model to predict venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric trauma through an analysis of a contemporary cohort in the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective internal validation was performed in 10 randomly stratified samples of children (age 0-17 years) from the NTDB 2013-2016. Model discrimination was determined by calculation of the c-statistic (AUC), and calibration was evaluated through analysis of observed to expected (O:E) ratio. Recalibration was performed with application of a mixed-effects logistic regression. Model parameters were reestimated based on recalibration.

RESULTS

Retrospective review identified 481,485 pediatric trauma patients with 729 (0.2%) episodes of VTE. Discriminatory ability of the model in all random cohorts was significant with AUC > 0.93 (p < 0.001). Inadequate calibration was noted in 4 of 10 cohorts and the entire dataset (p < 0.001) with an O:E ratio of 1.79. Model recalibration resulted in similar discrimination (AUC = 0.95) with improved calibration (O:E ratio = 1.33, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric trauma prediction models can provide useful data for VTE risk stratification in injured children, but these models must be validated and calibrated prior to use. Recalibration of the model in question resulted in improved accuracy in a contemporary NTDB dataset. These data provide an appropriately calibrated and validated model for clinical use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II - Prospective internal validation of a multivariable prediction model.

Pediatric trauma venous thromboembolism prediction algorithm outperforms current anticoagulation prophylaxis guidelines: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in injured children is rare, but sequelae can be morbid and life-threatening. Recent trauma society guidelines suggesting that all children over 15 years old should receive thromboprophylaxis may result in overtreatment. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of a previously published VTE prediction algorithm and compare it to current recommendations.

METHODS

Two institutional trauma registries were queried for all pediatric (age < 18 years) patients admitted from 2007 to 2018. Clinical data were applied to the algorithm and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was calculated to test algorithm efficacy.

RESULTS

A retrospective review identified 8271 patients with 30 episodes of VTE (0.36%). The VTE prediction algorithm classified 51 (0.6%) as high risk (> 5% risk), 322 (3.9%) as moderate risk (1-5% risk) and 7898 (95.5%) as low risk (< 1% risk). AUROC was 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.97). In our population, prophylaxis of the 'moderate-' and 'high-risk' cohorts would outperform the sensitivity (60% vs. 53%) and specificity (96% vs. 77%) of current guidelines while anticoagulating substantially fewer patients (373 vs. 1935, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A VTE prediction algorithm using clinical variables can identify injured children at risk for venous thromboembolic disease with more discrimination than current guidelines. Prospective studies are needed to investigate the validity of this model.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III-Clinical decision rule evaluated in a single population.

Symptomatic catheter-associated thrombosis in pediatric trauma patients: Choose your access wisely

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injury and the presence of a central venous catheter are 2 of the strongest risk factors for venous thromboembolism in children. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of symptomatic, catheter-associated thrombosis in critically injured children. We hypothesized that femoral venous catheters are associated with a greater rate of thrombotic complications when compared with all other central venous access points.

METHODS

We reviewed a retrospective cohort (2006-2016) of injured children (≤18 years) admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit with central access placed ≤7 days from admission. Symptomatic, catheter-associated thrombosis was determined by radiographic evidence. Poisson regression was used to compare the incidence of catheter-associated thrombosis per 1,000 catheter days between femoral and nonfemoral catheters. All comparisons were 2-tailed with α = 0.05.

RESULTS

We examined 209 pediatric trauma patients with central access (65% femoral, 19% subclavian, 11% arm vein, and 5% internal jugular). Femoral catheters were removed earlier (median [interquartile range] 4 [2-7] vs 8 [3-12] days, P < .001) and were larger in diameter (5 Fr [4-7] vs 4 Fr [4-4], P < .001) when compared with all other catheters. Catheter-associated thrombosis was more frequent in femoral versus nonfemoral catheters (18.4 vs 3.5 per 1,000 catheter days, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Femoral venous catheters are associated with a greater incidence of symptomatic, catheter-associated thrombosis in pediatric trauma patients. When central venous access is indicated for injured children, the femoral site should be avoided. If a femoral venous catheter is necessary, use of a smaller catheter should be considered.

Venous thromboembolism risk factors in a pediatric trauma population

PURPOSE

New guidelines have been proposed for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in pediatric trauma patients. This paper seeks to evaluate risk factors associated with VTE that might further guide patient selection for prophylaxis.

METHODS

Review of a tertiary children's academic hospital's trauma database for VTE events and associated risk factors from 2005 to 2016.

RESULTS

15,306 pediatric trauma patients were identified and reviewed. During this time period there were 6191 admissions (40.4%), of which 20 developed a VTE (0.3%) including two pulmonary emboli. Primary outcome was comparison of risk factors for developing a VTE that were identified in the literature. Age stratification revealed the highest incidence of VTE in children under the age of 2 (0.7%), which increased with CVC placement when compared to children aged 2-12 and 13-15 (0.036 Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSIONS

VTE after pediatric trauma is rare, and may be more uncommon than previously reported. CVC placement was the strongest predictor of VTE, particularly in infant and toddler patients which can explain their higher overall incidence compared to other pediatric age groups. Identifying high-risk patients is important to optimize screening and prophylaxis of VTE in pediatric trauma patients while minimizing risks of anticoagulation.

Venous thromboembolism following inpatient pediatric surgery: Analysis of 153,220 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates and risk factors following inpatient pediatric surgery.

METHODS

153,220 inpatient pediatric surgical patients were selected from the 2012-2015 NSQIP-P database. Demographic and perioperative variables were documented. Primary outcome was VTE requiring treatment within 30 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and 30-day mortality. Prediction models were generated using logistic regression. Mortality and time to VTE were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

305 patients (0.20%) developed 296 venous thromboses and 12 pulmonary emboli (3 cooccurrences). Median time to VTE was 9 days. Most VTEs (81%) occurred predischarge. Subspecialties with highest VTE rates were cardiothoracic (0.72%) and general surgery (0.28%). No differences were seen for elective vs. urgent/emergent procedures (p = 0.106). All-cause mortality VTE patients was 1.2% vs. 0.2% in patients without VTE (p < 0.001). After stratifying by American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, no mortality differences remained when ASA < 3. Preoperative, postoperative, and total LOSs were longer for patients with VTE (p < 0.001 for each). ASA ≥ 3, preoperative sepsis, ventilator dependence, enteral/parenteral feeding, steroid use, preoperative blood transfusion, gastrointestinal disease, hematologic disorders, operative time, and age were independent predictors (C-statistic = 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric postsurgical patients have unique risk factors for developing VTE.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Efficacy of surveillance ultrasound for venous thromboembolism diagnosis in critically ill children after trauma

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasingly prevalent in injured children admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Few data exist to support VTE pharmacologic prophylaxis or ultrasound (US) surveillance in children with high bleeding risk. After implementation of screening US guidelines, we sought to describe our experience, hypothesizing that screening US of children at highest risk for VTE results in earlier detection and management.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis was conducted on prospectively collected data of injured children admitted to an American College of Surgeons Verified level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center from 2010 to 2015. In patients at high risk for both VTE and bleeding (HRHR), guidelines recommended deferral of pharmacologic prophylaxis and a screening US at ≥7 ICU days if bleeding risk remained. Outcomes analyzed included VTE rates, guideline compliance, and US timing. The rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) detection (number of DVT captured/number of US obtained) was examined.

RESULTS

Of 4061 trauma patients, 588 (14.5%) were critically injured including 112 patients who met HRHR criteria. The rate of VTE in the HRHR group ≥7 ICU days was 25% (14/56). Of 23 VTE diagnosed in the ICU, 17 were detected by 49 US performed (34.7%), with the remaining 6 diagnosed by computed tomography. DVT was detected earlier than the US guideline recommended 7 days, independent of symptoms. Guideline compliance was 86%.

CONCLUSION

Critically injured children at risk for bleeding frequently develop VTE. Surveillance ultrasound in patients at high risk for both VTE and bleeding allows earlier detection and treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level II.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolic events in pediatric surgical patients: Defining indications for prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric surgical patients is a rare event. The risk factors for VTE in pediatric general surgery patients undergoing abdominopelvic procedures are unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

The American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database (2012-2015) was queried for patients with VTE after abdominopelvic general surgery procedures. Patient and operative variables were assessed to identify risk factors associated with VTE and develop a pediatric risk score.

RESULTS

From 2012-2015, 68 of 34,813 (0.20%) patients who underwent abdominopelvic general surgery procedures were diagnosed with VTE. On multivariate analysis, there was no increased risk of VTE based on concomitant malignancy, chemotherapy, inflammatory bowel disease, or laparoscopic surgical approach, while a higher rate of VTE was identified among female patients. The odds of experiencing VTE were increased on stepwise regression for patients older than 15 years and those with preexisting renal failure or a diagnosis of septic shock, patients with American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) classification ≥ 2, and for anesthesia time longer than 2 h. The combination of age > 15 years, ASA classification ≥ 2, anesthesia time > 2 h, renal failure, and septic shock was included in a model for predicting risk of VTE (AUC = 0.907, sensitivity 84.4%, specificity 88.2%).

CONCLUSION

VTE is rare in pediatric patients, but prediction modeling may help identify those patients at heightened risk. Additional studies are needed to validate the factors identified in this study in a risk assessment model as well as to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Multicenter Review of Current Practices Associated With Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients After Trauma

OBJECTIVES

Frequency of venous thromboembolism in pediatric trauma patients admitted to PICUs is not insignificant, ranging up to 6%. Risk factors have been identified in this population. However, there is little consensus of actual venous thromboembolism prophylaxis practice. We examined factors associated with venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in PICUs.

DESIGN

A retrospective study evaluating associations with mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, or dual therapy (DUAL) prophylaxis compared with no venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Multivariable logistic regression explored the relationship between prophylaxis type and selected covariates with stepwise selection method to identify the independent predictors of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis utilization.

SETTING

Five level I/II pediatric trauma centers in the United States.

PATIENTS

Children less than 18 years from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013, admitted to the PICU after a trauma, identified through combined trauma registry and Virtual Pediatric Systems database.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Six hundred ninety-two patients were included in the database, with 55 excluded for missing data. Of the remaining 637 patients, 538 (84.5%) had no venous thromboembolism prophylaxis by 48 hours, 77 (12.1%) had only mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, 11 (1.7%) had DUAL, and 11 (1.7%) had pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis alone. Multivariable analysis showed increased age, and orthopedic procedure was associated with all forms of prophylaxis. Orthopedic procedures were associated with higher utilization of dual prophylaxis use (odds ratio, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.2-21.8), pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% CI, 2.3-31.7), and mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.2) alone. Brain/spinal cord procedures (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.9-7.3) and abdominal procedures (odds ratio, 6.6; 95% CI, 2.5-17.1) were associated with mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Head injury was associated with a decreased use of any prophylaxis (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.9). Patient comorbidities were associated with decreased use of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is not common in critically ill children after trauma. Patient age, orthopedic and vascular procedures, and higher injury severity are associated with pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients: Guidelines from the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (APAGBI)

The Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (APAGBI) Guidelines Working Group on Thromboprophylaxis in Children has reviewed the literature and where possible provided advice on the care of children in the perioperative period. Areas reviewed include the incidence of perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), risk factors, evidence for mechanical and chemical prophylaxis, and complications. Safe practice of regional anesthesia with anticoagulant prophylaxis is detailed. In summary, there are few areas of strong evidence. Routine prophylaxis cannot be recommended for young children. Postpubertal adolescents (approximately 13 years and over) are at a slightly increased risk of VTE and should be assessed for prophylaxis and may warrant intervention if other risk factors are present. However, the incidence of VTE is significantly lower than in the adult population. This special interest review presents a summary and discussion of the key recommendations, a decision-making algorithm and a risk assessment chart. For the full guideline, go to www.apagbi.org.uk/publications/apa-guidelines.

Venous Thromboembolism Quality Measures Fail to Accurately Measure Quality

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is 1 of the most common causes of preventable harm for patients in hospitals. Consequently, the Joint Commission, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the United Kingdom Care Quality Commission, the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission, and the American College of Surgeons have prioritized measuring and reporting VTE outcomes with the goal of reducing the incidence of and preventable harm from VTE. We developed a rubric for defect-free VTE prevention, graded each organizational VTE quality measure, and found that none of the current VTE-related quality measures adequately characterizes VTE prevention efforts or outcomes in hospitalized patients. Effective VTE prevention is multifactorial: clinicians must assess patients’ risk for VTE and prescribe therapy appropriate for each patient’s risk profile, patients must accept the prescribed therapy, and nurses must administer the therapy as prescribed. First, an ideal, defect-free VTE prevention process measure requires: (1) documentation of a standardized VTE risk assessment; (2) prescription of optimal, risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis; and (3) administration of all risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis as prescribed. Second, an ideal VTE outcome measure should define potentially preventable VTE as VTE that developed in patients who experienced any VTE prevention process failures.

Management Issues in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients with Trauma

The management of critically ill pediatric patients with trauma poses many challenges because of the infrequency and diversity of severe injuries and a paucity of high-level evidence to guide care for these uncommon events. This article discusses recent recommendations for early resuscitation and blood component therapy for hypovolemic pediatric patients with trauma. It also highlights the specific types of injuries that lead to severe injury in children and presents challenges related to their management.

Venous thromboembolism in children with cystic fibrosis: Retrospective incidence and intrapopulation risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a rare but serious medical condition. Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a risk for recurrent pediatric VTE and has potential thrombophilic tendency. However, much remains unknown, including incidence and intrapopulation risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of pediatric CF patients followed at Children's Hospital Colorado from January 1st 2003 through May 20th 2016 was examined. Cases were identified by informatics and validated manually. Data on CF severity, co-morbidities and treatment, central venous catheter (CVC) use, and thrombophilia were obtained from an institutional CF database and chart review.

RESULTS

Nineteen VTE occurred in 458 participants followed for 3595 person-years, yielding an incidence rate of 53 VTE per 10,000 children with CF. VTE cases had additional co-morbidities including CF-related diabetes (p=0.002) and sinus disease (p=0.04), more total admissions (p<0.001), admit days (p<0.001), positive respiratory cultures (p<0.001), pseudomonas infections (p<0.001), steroid courses (p=0.001), and total CVC days (PICC p=0.03, port p=0.007). On univariate analysis, older age (RR 1.162, p=0.007), sinus disease (RR 2.62, p=0.05), longer hospital stay (RR 1.03, p<0.001), higher ESR (RR 1.02, p=0.03) and CRP (RR 1.07, p=0.007), and an absence of systemic steroids (RR 0.19, p=0.004) increased the risk of VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, children with CF had a higher incidence of VTE when compared to the previously reported incidence in the overall pediatric population at Children's Hospital Colorado. Overall, those with VTE had a greater disease burden and older age, sinus disease, longer hospitalization and increased inflammation were VTE risk factors.