Risk of infectious complications in pelvic fracture urethral injury patients managed with internal fixation and suprapubic catheter placement

Does Anterior Plating of Pelvic Ring Fractures Increase Infection Risk in Patients With Bladder or Urethral Injuries?

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the effect of anterior fixation on infection in patients with operative pelvic fractures and bladder or urethral injuries.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Eight centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Adult patients with closed pelvic fractures with associated bladder or urethral injuries treated with anterior plating (AP), intramedullary screw (IS), or no anterior internal fixation (NAIF, including external fixation or no fixation).

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Deep infection.

RESULTS

There were 81 extraperitoneal injuries and 57 urethral injuries. There was no difference in infection between fixation groups across all urologic injuries (AP: 10.8%, IS: 0%, NAIF: 4.9%, P = 0.41). There was a higher rate of infection in the urethral injury group compared with extraperitoneal injuries (14.0% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.016). Among extraperitoneal injuries, specifically, there was no difference in deep infection related to fixation (AP: 2.6%, IS 0%, NAIF: 2.9%, P = 0.99). Among urethral injuries, there was no statistical difference in deep infection related to fixation (AP: 23.1%, IS: 0%, NAIF: 7.4%, P = 0.21). There was a higher rate of suprapubic catheter (SPC) use in urethral injuries compared with extraperitoneal injuries (57.9% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.0001). In the urethral injury group, SPC use did not have a statistically significant difference in infection rate (SPC: 18.2% vs. No SPC: 8.3%, P = 0.45). Early removal of the SPC before or during the definitive orthopaedic intervention did not significantly affect infection rate (early: 0% vs. delayed: 25.0%, P = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons should approach operative pelvic fractures with associated urologic injuries with caution given the high risk of infection. Further work must be done to elucidate the effect of anterior implants and SPC use and duration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complications of surgically treated pelvic ring injuries with associated genitourinary injuries

OBJECTIVE

Pelvic ring injuries are often associated with vascular and intrapelvic organ injuries including damage to the genitourinary system. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between surgically treated pelvic ring injuries and genitourinary injuries. The primary outcome was to determine the rate of post-operative complications including infection, urinary dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction. The secondary outcome was to determine if the time to surgery was associated with post-operative complications.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review from September 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019 of patients who sustained a pelvic ring injury which required surgical intervention. All patients with closed triradiate cartilage were included.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients met the inclusion criteria, 12 patients with an associated genitourinary (GU) injury were included in the GU group and 103 without GU injury were placed in the non-GU group. The median (range) age of patients in the GU group was 49.5 years (20, 64) and 48 years (15, 92) in the control group (p = 0.92). Demographic characteristics including age, Injury Severity Score and Elixhauser comorbidity score were similar between groups. Within the GU group, five patients had an injury to their bladder, four to their urethra and three had an injury to their kidney. In the GU group, one patient developed a wound dehiscence and one developed a urinary tract infection with subsequent sepsis (17%), while in the non-GU group, one patient (1%) developed erectile dysfunction (p = 0.028). Regression analysis demonstrated that having concomitant pelvic ring and GU injuries, as well as the number of surgeries were variables associated with post-operative complications, while time to surgery was not.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic ring injuries with concomitant genitourinary injuries were associated with increased odds of post-operative complications. No differences were noted in complication rates due to the time to surgery between groups.

Team Approach: Evaluation and Management of Pelvic Ring Injuries

A multidisciplinary approach to the management of pelvic ring injuries has been shown to decrease mortality rates. The primary goals within the emergency room are to assess, resuscitate, and stabilize the patient. The Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol guides the initial assessment of the patient. A pelvic binder or sheet should be applied to help to provide reduction of the fracture and temporary stabilization. The trauma team becomes the primary service for the patient as he or she transitions away from the emergency department. The trauma team must effectively communicate with and serve as the liaison between other specialists as injuries are identified. emodynamic stability should be closely monitored in patients with pelvic ring injuries, involving the assessment of vital signs, imaging findings, and clinical judgment. Angioembolization and peritoneal packing may play a role in helping to control hemorrhage. Urologists should be consulted if a Foley catheter cannot be passed or there is concern for urethral or bladder injury. Further imaging or urologic intervention may be necessary. Orthopaedic surgeons can help to assess the patient, classify the injury, and assist in temporary stabilization while planning definitive fixation.

Risk of Mortality and Readmission among Patients with Pelvic Fracture and Urinary Tract Infection: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Patients with pelvic fractures could encounter various complications during or after treatments. This cohort study investigated the risk of mortality and readmissions in patients with pelvic fractures, with or without urinary tract infections (UTIs), within 30 days following the pelvic fractures. This retrospective cohort study examined claim records from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 (LHID2000). We selected patients hospitalized with pelvic fractures between 1997 and 2013 for study. Patients who had index data before 2000 or after 2010 (n = 963), who died before the index date (n = 64), who were aged <18 years (n = 94), or who had a pelvic injury (n = 31) were excluded. In total, the study cohort comprised 1623 adult patients; 115 had UTIs, and 1508 patients without UTIs were used as a comparison cohort. Multivariate analysis with a multiple Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed to analyze the data. Our results showed that the 1-year mortality rate (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.25-4.29) and readmission rate (adjusted HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.26-3.34) of the UTI group were significantly higher than those of the non-UTI group. Moreover, the Kaplan-Meier curve for the 1-year follow-up indicated that the UTI group had a higher cumulative risk of both mortality and hospital readmission compared with the non-UTI group. In conclusion, among patients with pelvic fracture, patients with UTI were associated with increased risks of mortality and readmission. Physicians must pay more attention to such patients to prevent UTIs among patients with pelvic fractures during hospitalization and conduct a follow-up after discharge within at least 1 year.

Delayed and Chronic Sequelae of Trauma and the Role of the Interventional Radiologist

In addition to acute injury requiring interventional radiologic treatments, patients with traumatic injuries can develop delayed or chronic complications. These injuries can involve nearly all solid organs in the abdomen. Coupled with significant improvements in visualizing these injuries with advanced imaging techniques such as minimally invasive procedures, nonoperative management of both acute traumatic injuries and their longer term sequelae has become the norm. This article reviews frequently seen complications of traumatic injury and their management by interventional radiologists.

Management of urological trauma associated with pelvic fractures

Urological trauma is frequently encountered in patients with high energy pelvic fractures and can have debilitating long-term sequelae for patients without appropriate multidisciplinary management. Anterior pelvic ring disruption causes a high incidence of bladder rupture and urethral injuries, and initial assessment requires urological tract imaging and emergent bladder drainage before subsequent surgical repair. Pelvic ring disruption requires urgent fixation and should be managed as an open fracture in the context of significant bladder and urethral injury with urinary leakage. Long-term outcomes are variable and genitourinary dysfunction is commonly reported among patients with pelvic fractures. Optimisation of patient outcomes relies heavily on collaborative management between orthopaedic and urological specialists and requires an appreciation of the anatomical intricacies of the pelvis. This article provides an overview of the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics management of urological trauma in the context of pelvic fractures.

Dhavileswarapu AVL, Naik N, Karimi H, Hegde P, Rai BP, Somani BK. Big Data Analytics in urology: the story so far and the road ahead

Artificial intelligence (AI) has a proven record of application in the field of medicine and is used in various urological conditions such as oncology, urolithiasis, paediatric urology, urogynaecology, infertility and reconstruction. Data is the driving force of AI and the past decades have undoubtedly witnessed an upsurge in healthcare data. Urology is a specialty that has always been at the forefront of innovation and research and has rapidly embraced technologies to improve patient outcomes and experience. Advancements made in Big Data Analytics raised the expectations about the future of urology. This review aims to investigate the role of big data and its blend with AI for trends and use in urology. We explore the different sources of big data in urology and explicate their current and future applications. A positive trend has been exhibited by the advent and implementation of AI in urology with data available from several databases. The extensive use of big data for the diagnosis and treatment of urological disorders is still in its early stage and under validation. In future however, big data will no doubt play a major role in the management of urological conditions.

Extraperitoneal Bladder Injuries Associated With Pelvic Fracture Requiring Internal Fixation: What Is the Evidence?

Traumatic bladder injuries are commonly associated with pelvic fractures. While the majority of intraperitoneal bladder injuries are surgically repaired, extraperitoneal bladder injuries (EBIs) can be managed nonoperatively in the absence of complex injury patterns such as bladder neck injury or presence of bone spicules in the bladder. Concern for pelvic hardware contamination is one of the most common reasons for repairing EBIs at the time of orthopedic interventions for pelvic fracture (usually open reduction and internal fixation). However, given the inconsistent and limited evidence, practice patterns are different and largely depend on surgeon preferences and institutional management. In this review, we explore the roots for this concern and summarize the current evidence on risk of pelvic hardware infection with nonoperative management of EBIs.

Treatment Discrepancy for Pelvic Fracture Patients With Urethral Injuries: A Survey of Orthopaedic and Urologic Surgeons

OBJECTIVES

In patients with traumatic pelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUI), the interaction between urethral management and orthopaedic decision making remains unknown. We aimed to survey orthopaedic and urologic surgeons to assess interdisciplinary interactions in the management of PFUI.

METHODS

An anonymous cross-sectional survey of members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) and the Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons (GURS) was conducted between September 2017 and August 2018. Participants were queried regarding the impact of urethral injuries and their management on orthopaedic operative decision making.

RESULTS

Fifty-three GURS and 64 OTA members responded (17% response rate). For urethral injury management, 73% of OTA respondents preferred that suprapubic tubes (SPTs) were not placed for urethral injury management, whereas 43% of GURS respondents preferred SPTs (P = 0.08). Ninety-two percent of OTA respondents stated that SPTs increase hardware infection risks in patients undergoing pelvic open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF), whereas only 8% of GURS respondents agreed (P < 0.01). Although 66% of GURS respondents reported not considering the operative plans of orthopaedics when determining urethral management, 75% of OTA respondents reported that they were less inclined to proceed with ORIF, and 70% would perform external fixation in the setting of an SPT, despite 78% believing that this resulted in an inferior outcome for the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

There is discordance between urologists and orthopaedists as to the optimal management of PFUI patients, with significant disagreement regarding the infectious risks of SPT in the setting of ORIF. Improved data and interdisciplinary dialogue are required to maximize patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.