Treatment of chest wall implosion injuries without thoracotomy: technique and clinical outcomes

[Treatment strategy for severe implosion injuries of the lateral chest wall]

In the majority of cases implosion injuries to the thoracic wall are caused by blunt, massive force acting on the thorax. Basically, different regions and directions of the acting energy have to be taken into account. In common usage, the term implosion injury has become established, especially for the sequelae of lateral energy impact. Particular attention should be paid to the stability of the shoulder girdle, the underlying hemithorax and its intrathoracic organs.

Epidemiology of combined clavicle and rib fractures: a systematic review

Purpose

The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the incidence of combined clavicle and rib fractures and the association between these two injuries.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases on the 14^th of August 2020. Outcome measures were incidence, hospital length of stay (HLOS), intensive care unit admission and length of stay (ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), mortality, chest tube duration, Constant–Murley score, union and complications.

Results

Seven studies with a total of 71,572 patients were included, comprising five studies on epidemiology and two studies on treatment. Among blunt chest trauma patients, 18.6% had concomitant clavicle and rib fractures. The incidence of rib fractures in polytrauma patients with clavicle fractures was 56–60.6% versus 29% in patients without clavicle fractures. Vice versa, 14–18.8% of patients with multiple rib fractures had concomitant clavicle fractures compared to 7.1% in patients without multiple rib fractures. One study reported no complications after fixation of both injuries. Another study on treatment, reported shorter ILOS and less complications among operatively versus conservatively treated patients (5.4 ± 1.5 versus 21 ± 13.6 days).

Conclusion

Clavicle fractures and rib fractures are closely related in polytrauma patients and almost a fifth of all blunt chest trauma patients sustain both injuries. Definitive conclusions could not be drawn on treatment of the combined injury. Future research should further investigate indications and benefits of operative treatment of this injury.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-021-01701-4.

Assessing the analgesic efficacy of oral epigallocatechin-3-gallate on epidural catheter analgesia in patients after surgical stabilisation of multiple rib fractures: a prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

CONTEXT

Thoracic trauma results in multiple rib fractures (MRF), and surgical stabilisation of rib fractures (SSRF) can relieve fracture pain. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) is reported to exhibit beneficial effects in bone-related metabolic and differentiation processes.

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical effect of EGCG on regional analgesia for pain relief in MRF patients after SSRF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-seven MRF patients (61 males, 36 females) who were on epidural catheter analgesia after SSRF were recruited. They were randomly divided into: oral EGCG 100 mg (oral grade) twice daily for 10 days and placebo groups. Pain scores, incentive spirometry (IS) volumes, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) were assessed day 10 after SSRF.

RESULTS

Comparing results from the placebo and EGCG group, in the 10-day intervention course, oral EGCG reduced pain score (8 at base line vs. 4 at end of intervention in EGCG group, p < 0.05; 4 in EGCG group vs. 6 in placebo group at end of intervention, p < 0.05), improved IS volume (713 at base line vs. 1072 at end of intervention in EGCG group, p < 0.05; 1072 in EGCG group vs. 953 in placebo group at end of intervention, p < 0.05) and respiratory rate (24 at base line vs. 15 at end of intervention in EGCG group, p < 0.05; 15 in EGCG group vs. 19 in placebo group at end of intervention, p < 0.05). However, no further enhancing effect on SpO₂ was observed in the EGCG group (0.98 in EGCG group vs. 0.98 in placebo group at end of intervention, p > 0.05).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Although the study is limited by a relatively small sample size and lack of serum factor analysis, the key results and the study design, for the first time, nevertheless pave the way for trials with larger number of patients to understand the effect of EGCG in MRF patients that are undergoing SSRF.

External flail chest stabilization; The simple, low-cost way

Flail chest is a life-threatening clinical entity which can be complicated by respiratory insufficiency. Paradoxical motion of a part of chest wall is the basic cause to put the blame on. Consequently, stabilization of the chest wall is occasionally of paramount importance to achieve early extubation in a patient with post-trauma respiratory insufficiency. Hereby, a simple, low cost, harmless and effective approach of external stabilization is presented.

Late Operative Rib Fixation is Inferior to Nonoperative Management

BACKGROUND

Operative rib fixation (ORF) of traumatic rib fractures has been shown to decrease hospital length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, and mortality. ORF performed within 1 day of admission has been shown to have favorable outcomes compared to later ORF. This report examines the ORF experience over 10 years at a level I trauma center.

METHODS

ORF patients from January 2007-January 2018 were matched to nonoperative controls in a 1:2 ratio based on age, injury severity score (ISS), chest Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), and head AIS. Patient demographic, injury, and outcome data were collected from the trauma registry and medical records. Hospital day of ORF was identified for each ORF patient. Hospital LOS, ICU LOS, ventilator days, and mortality were compared against matched nonoperative controls.

RESULTS

Ninety-five ORF patients were matched to 190 nonoperative patients. ORF patients had a higher number of rib fractures (9.6 vs 6.4, P < .001). ORF patients with short time to operation (0-2 days) had a shorter average hospital stay than those with delayed operations (11.8 vs 12.6 vs 13.4 vs 19.6 days, P = .003). ORF patients with operations performed 3-4 days and >6 days after admission also had statistically significant longer ICU LOS and ventilator days. Patient mortality was higher when ORF was performed after 6 days.

DISCUSSION

Early ORF may improve pulmonary function, patient outcomes, and decrease LOS. Shifting practice toward early fixation may help further solidify the benefits of this procedure in the treatment of blunt chest trauma.

Comparison of Surgical Stabilization Time in Patients with Flail Chest

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of early and late surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs) in patients with flail chest.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with flail chest according to surgical stabilization time of rib fractures (early [≤ 72 hours] and late [>72 hours]). Outcome measures included duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, and morbidity and mortality rates. A correlation analysis was performed between the time from trauma to stabilization and the clinical outcomes after stabilization.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were evaluated (36 and 34 in the early and late groups, respectively). The demographics and indicators of injury severity were comparable in both groups. The early group had significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (23.7 vs. 165.6 hours; p = 0.003), ICU stay (6.5 vs. 19.7 days; p = 0.003), hospital stay (9 vs. 22.5 days; p = 0.001), and lower rate of atelectasis (11 vs. 58%; p = 0.01), pneumonia (8.8 vs. 50%; p = 0.001), and empyema (2.8 vs. 20.6%; p = 0.019). According to the correlation analysis, it was found that early surgical stabilization had a positive significant effect on clinical outcomes after stabilization.

CONCLUSION

Early SSRFs in patients with flail chest results in more favorable clinical outcomes. It should be performed as soon as possible in the presence of indication and if feasible.

Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Indications, Techniques, and Pitfalls

Rib fractures are a common thoracic injury that is encountered in 20% to 39% of patients with blunt chest trauma and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality^1,2. Traditionally, the majority of patient with rib fractures have been managed nonoperatively. Recently, the utilization of surgical stabilization of rib fractures has increased considerably because the procedure has shown improved outcomes^3-5.

Assessing outcome measures used after rib fracture: A COSMIN systematic review

PURPOSE

The incidence of invasive treatment of rib fracture has increased significantly over the last decade however the evidence of improved patient outcomes to support this is lacking. A systematic review was performed to identify patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in the assessment of outcomes following chest wall injury. The quality of evidence for the psychometric properties of the identified PROMs was graded using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology.

METHODS

Rib fracture studies measuring patient reported outcomes were identified using PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, AMED and PsycINFO. Methodological quality of measurement properties was evaluated with the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 64 studies were identified including 19 different PROM instruments. Domains included in the reported PROMs included pain, breathlessness, general health quality of life, physical function and physiological health. No rib fracture specific PROM was identified. The most frequently reported instrument was the SF-36 reporting overall quality of life (HRQoL) although there was very low quality evidence for its content validity. There was low quality evidence to support good content validity for the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale, Brief Pain Index (BPI) and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). No PROM had undergone validation in a rib fracture population. The overall quality of the PROM development studies was poor. While we were unable to identify a clear "gold standard", based on the limited current evidence, we recommend that the EQ-5D-5L is used in combination with the MRC and BPI or MPQ for future rib fracture studies.

CONCLUSION

The lack of validated outcome measures for rib fracture patients is a significant limitation of the current literature. Further studies are needed to provide validated outcome measures to ensure accuracy of the reported results and conclusions. As interventions for rib fractures have become more common in both research and clinical practice this has become an urgent priority.

Recent advances in rib fracture fixation

As a means of treating rib fractures, surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has been carried out sporadically for nearly 100 years. However, with the recent advent of new materials and technologies suitable for SSRF, the developmental rate and data concerning SSRF have increased greatly. The main manifestations of these advancements include the improvement of the preoperative localization method by combining CT scanning with three-dimensional reconstruction technology and ultrasound application to accurately locate fractures. The bone fracture plate is specifically used for rib fixation, and the intramedullary fixation devices and special SSRF tools make SSRF relatively simple. The application of 3D printing technology can accurately reproduce the anatomical shape of the fracture site under in vitro conditions before operation and combine with the internal fixation of chest wall, especially the thoracoscopy-assisted internal fixation of the chest wall, to achieve the minimally invasive internal fixation of the rib fracture. Absorbable internal fixation materials and thoracoscopic SSRF are considered the primary future research directions.

Early versus late surgical stabilization of severe rib fractures in patients with respiratory failure: A retrospective study

Introduction

The timing of surgical stabilization of rib fractures remains controversial. We hypothesized that early surgical stabilization (within 3 days of injury) can improve clinical outcome in patients with severe rib fractures and respiratory failure. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of early surgical stabilization of rib fractures on the perioperative results, clinical outcomes, and medical costs of patients with severe rib fractures and respiratory failure.

Methods

This was a retrospective comparative study based on a prospectively collected database at a single institute. Patients with severe rib fractures and respiratory failure who underwent surgical stabilization were classified into early (within 3 days of injury) and late (more than 3 days after injury) groups. Outcome measures included operation time, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, complication rate, mortality rate, and medical cost.

Results

A total of 33 patients were enrolled (16 and 17 in the early and late groups, respectively). The demographics, trauma mechanism, associated injuries, and severity of trauma were comparable in both groups. The early group had significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (median 36 vs. 90 hours, p = 0.03), intensive care unit stay (median 123 vs. 230 hours, p = 0.004), and hospital stay (median 12 vs. 18 days, p = 0.005); and lower National Health Insurance costs (median 6,617 vs. 10,017 US dollars, p = 0.031). The early group tended to have lower rates of morbidity and mortality, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Early surgical stabilization of rib fractures in selected patients may significantly shorten their duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit and hospital stays, while incurring less medical costs.

Fixation of flail chest or multiple rib fractures: current evidence and how to proceed. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to present current evidence on rib fixation and to compare effect estimates obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched on June 16th 2017 for both RCTs and observational studies comparing rib fixation versus nonoperative treatment. The MINORS criteria were used to assess study quality. Where possible, data were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. The primary outcome measure was mortality. Secondary outcome measures were hospital length of stay (HLOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), pneumonia, and tracheostomy.

Results

Thirty-three studies were included resulting in 5874 patients with flail chest or multiple rib fractures: 1255 received rib fixation and 4619 nonoperative treatment. Rib fixation for flail chest reduced mortality compared to nonoperative treatment with a risk ratio of 0.41 (95% CI 0.27, 0.61, p < 0.001, I² = 0%). Furthermore, rib fixation resulted in a shorter ILOS, DMV, lower pneumonia rate, and need for tracheostomy. Results from recent studies showed lower mortality and shorter DMV after rib fixation, but there were no significant differences for the other outcome measures. There was insufficient data to perform meta-analyses on rib fixation for multiple rib fractures. Pooled results from RCTs and observational studies were similar for all outcome measures, although results from RCTs showed a larger treatment effect for HLOS, ILOS, and DMV compared to observational studies.

Conclusions

Rib fixation for flail chest improves short-term outcome, although the indication and patient subgroup who would benefit most remain unclear. There is insufficient data regarding treatment for multiple rib fractures. Observational studies show similar results compared with RCTs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00068-018-1020-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Ribs osteosynthesis in patients with isolated and combined chest trauma]

INTRODUCTION

Rapid methods of costal fractures fixation using special costal plates are becoming more common.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of ribs osteosynthesis in patients with isolated and combined chest trauma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It is presented an experience of surgical treatment of patients with costal fractures in case of isolated (30) and combined (29) chest injury. System for ribs osteosynthesis was used predominantly in surgical tactics.

RESULTS

Immediate surgical results were analyzed. Most patients had increase of blood gas parameters, oxygenation in the postoperative period. In case of isolated chest injury mean duration of mechanical ventilation was 1.3±1.1, incidence of complications - 3.3%, mortality rate - 0%. In group of combined injuries those indexes were 4.6±3.05, 13.8% and 13.8% respectively.

CONCLUSION

The method of ribs osteosynthesis in patients with isolated and combined chest trauma showed high efficiency.

Surgical rib fixation - technical aspects

Surgical rib fixation (SRF) for severe rib fracture injuries is increasingly becoming an accepted treatment modality. There is now adequate evidence in randomised controlled trials that rib fixation in flail chest patients reduces ventilator times, intensive care stay and costs of treatment in ventilator dependent patients [1-3]. Despite this, rib fixation has not become standard of care for these patients and remains a treatment modality practised by few centres, usually those with large trauma loads who see high volumes of severe rib fracture injury patients. The purpose of this article is to outline the available prostheses, indications, operative planning and techniques of rib fixation. Surgical approaches to rib fractures in anterior, lateral and posterior positions are described as are the use of currently available cortical and medullary fixation prostheses.

Article Commentary: Contemporary Management of Flail Chest

Thoracic injury is currently the second leading cause of trauma-related death and rib fractures are the most common of these injuries. Flail chest, as defined by fracture of three or more ribs in two or more places, continues to be a clinically challenging problem. The underlying pulmonary contusion with subsequent inflammatory reaction and right-to-left shunting leading to hypoxia continues to result in high mortality for these patients. Surgical stabilization of the fractured ribs remains controversial. We review the history of management for flail chest alone and when combined with pulmonary contusion. Finally, we propose an algorithm for nonoperative and surgical management.

Surgical rib fixation for flail chest deformity improves liberation from mechanical ventilation

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to determine the impact of surgical rib fixation (SRF) in a treatment protocol for severe blunt chest trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with flail chest admitted between September 2009 and June 2010 to our level I trauma center who failed traditional management and underwent SRF were matched with an historical group. Outcome variables evaluated include age, injury severity score, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, ventilator days, total number of rib fractures, and total number of segmental rib fractures.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were similar in age, injury severity score, intensive care unit LOS, hospital LOS, total number of rib fractures, and total segmental rib fractures. The operative group demonstrated a significant reduction in total ventilator days as compared with the nonsurgical group (4.5 [0-30] vs 16.0 [4-40]; P = .040). Patients with SRF were permanently liberated from the ventilator within a median of 1.5 days (0-8 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical rib fixation resulted in a significant decrease in ventilator days and may represent a novel approach to decreasing morbidity in flail chest patients when used as a rescue therapy in patients with declining pulmonary status. Larger studies are required to further identify these benefits.

Risk factors for nonunion in 337 displaced midshaft clavicular fractures treated with Knowles pin fixation

BACKGROUND

Clavicular fractures account for nearly 10 % of all fractures, and the majority of those fractures involve the midshaft. Historically, these fractures were treated nonoperatively; however, recent data suggest an increased risk of nonunion and symptomatic malunion for displaced, comminuted midshaft clavicular fractures treated conservatively. Surgical intervention via plate osteosynthesis or intramedullary fixation with pins, nails, or screws has been shown to reduce, but not eliminate, this risk. Identification of risk factors predictive of nonunion would improve the overall management of displaced, comminuted midshaft clavicular fractures.

METHODS

The medical records of 337 consecutive patients who underwent Knowles pin fixation and supplemental cerclage for the treatment of displaced, comminuted midshaft clavicular fractures between April 2007 and March 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. The records of the mechanism of injury, side of injury, Robinson fracture classification, presence of associated injuries, cerclage material, and patient-related variables, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension and smoking, were analyzed. Variables were assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis to identify those factors significantly associated with the development of fracture nonunion.

RESULTS

A total of 19 nonunions occurred. Increasing age and use of wire for supplemental cerclage fixation were significantly associated with an increased risk for fracture nonunion (p < 0.001). Although suggested as predictors of nonunion in other studies, female gender and fracture severity were not significantly associated with nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonunion remains a significant complication in the treatment of displaced, comminuted midshaft clavicular fractures even with intramedullary fixation. Use of absorbable suture in place of wire for cerclage fixation and careful selection of treatment strategy in the elderly may reduce the risk for nonunion.

Predicting outcome of patients with chest wall injury

BACKGROUND

Rib fractures occur in 10% of injured patients, are associated with morbidity and mortality, and frequently necessitate intensive care unit (ICU) care. A scoring system that identifies the risk for respiratory failure early in the evaluation process may allow early intervention to improve outcomes. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that a scoring system based on initial clinical findings can identify patients with rib fractures at greatest risk for morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A simple scoring system to stratify risk was developed and applied to patients through a retrospective trauma registry review. Points were assigned as follows: age < 45 years = 1 point, age 45 to 65 years = 2 points, age > 65 years = 3 points; <3 fractures = 1 point, 3 to 5 fractures = 2 points, >5 fractures = 3 points; no pulmonary contusion = 0 points, mild pulmonary contusion = 1 point, severe pulmonary contusion = 2 points, bilateral pulmonary contusion = 3 points; and bilateral rib fracture absent = 0 points, bilateral rib fracture absent present = 2 points. A review of trauma registry patients with rib fractures (June 2008 to February 2010) at a state-designated level 1 trauma center was performed. Data reviewed included age, number of fractures, bilateral injury, presence of pulmonary contusion, classification of the contusion, length of hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and length of stay. The scoring system was retrospectively applied to 649 patients to determine validity.

RESULTS

A score ≤ 7 indicated lower mortality (24 of 579 [4.2%]) compared with patients with scores > 7 (10 of 70 [14.3%]) (Fisher's 2-sided P = .0018). Patients with scores ≤ 6 were less likely to be admitted to an ICU (29.7%) compared with those with scores ≥ 7 (56.7%) (P < .0001). Patients with total scores < 7 were less likely to require intubation (20.6%) compared with those with scores ≥ 7 (40.0%) (P < .0001). Patients with scores ≤ 4 had shorter lengths of stay (36.0% <5 days) compared with those who had scores > 4 (59.7%) (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

A simple scoring system predicts the likelihood that patients will require mechanical ventilation and prolonged courses of care. A score of 7 or 8 predicted increased risk for mortality, admission to the ICU, and intubation. A score > 5 predicted a longer length of stay and a longer period of ventilation. This scoring system may assist in the earlier implementation of treatment strategies such epidural anesthesia, ventilation, and operative fixation of fractures.

An Articulating Tool for Endoscopic Screw Delivery

This paper describes the development of an articulating endoscopic screw driver that can be used to place screws in osteosynthetic plates during thoracoscopic surgery. The device is small enough to be used with a 12 mm trocar sleeve and transmits sufficient torque to fully secure bone screws. The articulating joint enables correct screw alignment at obtuse angles, up to 60 deg from the tool axis. A novel articulating joint is presented, wherein a flexible shaft both transmits torque and actuates the joint; antagonist force is provided by a superelastic spring. Screws are secured against the driver blade during insertion with a retention mechanism that passively releases the screw once it is securely seated in the bone. The prototype has been fitted with a blade compatible with 2.0 and 2.3 mm self-drilling screws, though a different driver blade or drill bit can be easily attached. Efficacy of the tool has been demonstrated by thoracoscopically securing an osteosynthetic plate to a rib during an animal trial. This tool enables minimally invasive, thoracoscopic rib fixation.

Article Commentary: Rib Fracture Fixation: Controversies and Technical Challenges

Rib fractures are a common injury affecting more than 350,000 people each year in the United States and are associated with respiratory complications, prolonged hospitalization, prolonged pain, long-term disability, and mortality. The social and economic costs that rib fractures contribute to the health care burden of the United States are therefore significant. But despite this measurable impact on patients’ quality of life, current treatment of the majority of patients in the United States with rib fracture syndromes is supportive only. Even the most severe of chest wall injuries have historically been treated non-operatively. Recently, however, several reports from American centers support an increased application of operative fixation. With this resurgent interest of American surgeons in mind, we review the clinical presentations, potential indications, controversies, and technical challenges unique to rib fracture fixation.