Ten years stable internal fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal hand fractures-risk factor and outcome analysis show no increase of complications in the treatment of open compared with closed fractures

Phalangeal Fractures Requiring Vascular Reconstruction: Epidemiology and Factors Predictive of Reoperation

BACKGROUND

Demographic information related to phalangeal fractures that undergo simultaneous vascular repair, as well as their complication and reoperation profiles, remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to examine the patient and fracture characteristics influencing the outcomes after these injuries in a large Unites States adult patient cohort and to identify risk factors associated with unplanned reoperation of these fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed, identifying 54 phalangeal fractures in 48 patients; all fractures were also associated with vascular injuries requiring repair. Patients with digital amputations were excluded. A manual chart review was performed to collect epidemiologic, radiographic, and surgical outcome information.

RESULTS

The incidence of phalangeal fractures undergoing vascular repair was higher in the non-dominant hand, middle finger, proximal phalanx, and phalangeal shaft. Most (52.9%) fractures were due to occupational injury, with the most common mechanism being sharp injuries. More than half of the fractures had a nerve injury, and 13% required a vein graft for vascular repair. More than half of the fractures required at least one reoperation, most commonly due to "stiffness/tendon adhesion" (50%) and "nonunion or delayed union" (21.4%). In multivariable analysis, thumb (odds ratio [OR]: 35.1, P = .043) and index (OR: 14.0, P = .048) fingers' fractures were found to be independently associated with unplanned reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Phalangeal fractures requiring vascular repair occurred most often in the occupational setting and more than 50% required at least one unplanned reoperation. Injuries sustained in the thumb and index finger were more likely to undergo unplanned reoperation, which may guide initial treatment decision-making and postoperative follow-up.

Comparison of Intramedullary Screw Fixation, Plating, and K-Wires for Metacarpal Fracture Fixation: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Metacarpal fractures are common injuries with multiple options for fixation. Our purpose was to compare outcomes in metacarpal fractures treated with intramedullary screw fixation (IMF), Kirschner wires (K-wires), or plating.

METHODS

A systematic literature review using the MEDLINE database was performed for studies investigating metacarpal fractures treated with IMF, plating, or K-wires. We identified 34 studies (9 IMF, 8 plating, 17 K-wires). A meta-analysis using both mixed and fixed effects models was performed. Outcome measures included mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, total active motion (TAM), grip strength, time to radiographic healing, and rates of infection and reoperation.

RESULTS

Patients with IMF had significantly lower DASH scores (0.6 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-1.0]) compared with K-wires (7.4 [4.8-9.9]) and plating (9.8 [5.3-14.3]). Intramedullary screw fixation also had significantly lower rates of reoperation (4%, [2%-7%]), compared with K-wires (11% [7%-16%]) and plating (11% [0.07-0.17]). Grip strength was significantly higher in IMF (104.4% [97.0-111.8]) compared with K-wires (88.5%, [88.3-88.7]) and plating (90.3%, [85.4-95.2]). Mean odds ratio time was similar between IMF (21.0 minutes [10.4-31.6]) and K-wires (20.8 minutes [14.0-27.6]), but both were shorter compared with plating (52.6 minutes [33.1-72.1]). There were no statistically significant differences in time to radiographic healing, TAM, or rates of reoperation or infection.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis compared the outcomes of metacarpal fixation with IMF, K-wires, or plating. Intramedullary screw fixation provided statistically significant lower DASH scores, higher grip strength, and lower rates of reoperation, suggesting that it is a comparable method of fixation to K-wires and plating for metacarpal fractures.

Performance Outcomes and Return to Sport Following Metacarpal Fractures in Major League Baseball Players

BACKGROUND

Major League Baseball (MLB) players are at risk for metacarpal fractures; however, little is known regarding the impact of these injuries on future performance. The purpose of this study was to determine whether MLB players who sustain metacarpal fractures demonstrate decreased performance on return to competition in comparison to the performance of control-matched peers.

METHODS

Data for MLB position players with metacarpal fractures incurred over 17 seasons were obtained from injury reports, press releases, and player profiles. Age, position, career experience, body mass index (BMI), injury mechanism, handedness, and treatment were recorded. Individual season statistics for the 2 seasons immediately before injury and the 2 seasons after injury were obtained. Controls matched by player position, age, BMI, career experience, and performance statistics were identified. A performance comparison of the cohorts was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 24 players met inclusion criteria. Eleven players with metacarpal fractures were treated with surgery (46%) and 13 (54%) were treated nonoperatively. Players treated nonoperatively missed significantly fewer games following injury compared with those treated operatively (35.5 vs 52.6 games, P = .04). There was no significant difference in postinjury performance when compared with preinjury performance among the fracture cohorts. Players with metacarpal fractures treated nonoperatively had a significant decline in their Wins Above Replacement (WAR) 2 seasons postinjury (1.37 point decline) in comparison to matched controls (0.84 point increase) (P = .02). There was no significant difference in WAR 1 or 2 seasons postinjury for players with metacarpal fractures treated operatively in comparison to the control cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Major League Baseball players sustaining metacarpal fractures can expect to return to their preinjury performance levels following both nonoperative and operative treatment. However, players treated nonoperatively may witness a decline in their performance compared with peers over the long term. Orthopedic surgeons treating professional athletes with metacarpal fractures should consider these outcomes when counseling their patients and making treatment recommendations.

Reoperation After Operative Treatment of Open Finger Fractures

BACKGROUND

Our primary aim was to develop a prediction model for return to the operating room (OR) after open finger fractures by studying the reoperation rate of open finger fractures based on patient demographics, injury mechanism, injury severity, and type of initial surgical fixation. The secondary aim was to study the predictors for secondary surgery due to nonunion, postoperative infection, and secondary amputation.

METHODS

In the retrospective chart review, 1321 open finger fractures of 907 patients were included. Demographic-, injury-, and treatment-related factors were gathered from medical records.

RESULTS

We found that open fractures involving the thumb had lower odds of undergoing secondary surgery. Crush injury, proximal phalangeal fracture, arterial injury, other injured fingers, and other injuries to the ipsilateral hand were associated with higher odds of undergoing secondary surgery. However, the associated factors we identified were not powerful enough to create a predictive model. Other injury to the ipsilateral hand, vein repair, and external fixator as initial treatment were associated with postoperative nonunion. Crush injury and proximal phalangeal fracture were associated with postoperative infection. No factors were associated with secondary amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of open finger fractures will likely need more than one surgical procedure, especially in more severely injured fingers, due to crush or with vascular impairment. Furthermore, fractures involving the thumb have less reoperation, while fractures involving the proximal phalanx have poorest outcomes.

Incidence of Loss of Reduction After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures

BACKGROUND

This study compared the incidence of loss of reduction (LOR) between metacarpal fractures fixed with screws alone and those fixed with plates and screws. Secondary aims included identifying patient or fracture characteristics associated with increased risk of LOR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 138 metacarpal fractures in 106 patients treated with open reduction internal fixation with screws (60 fractures) or plates and screws (78 fractures) with a mean radiographic follow-up of 50 days for evidence of LOR. We compared the incidence of LOR between the screw and plate groups using a χ2 test. We performed logistic regression analysis to determine whether patient age, sex, metacarpal location (index, long, ring, small), the presence of multiple metacarpal fractures, or fracture pattern were associated with increased incidence of LOR.

RESULTS

Loss of reduction occurred in 19 (13.8%) of 138 fractures, with no statistically significant difference between lag screw (7 of 60, 11.6%) and plate fixation (12 of 78, 15.4%). Neither fracture pattern nor the presence of multiple metacarpal fractures was associated with an increased incidence of LOR, but patients experienced a 7% increase in the risk of LOR for each additional year of age. Loss of reduction occurred most frequently in index metacarpal fractures (4 of 12, 33%), although this did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no difference in LOR incidence between lag screw fixation and plate fixation. The overall incidence of LOR was higher in this study than previously reported and increased with increasing patient age.

The Use of an Adipofascial Flap to Prevent Extensor Tendon Adhesions After Plating of the Proximal Phalanx of the Fingers: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Extensor tendon adhesions occurring after proximal phalangeal (P1) fractures are not uncommon. A previous report described the use of an adipofascial flap (AFF) to prevent adhesions after dorsal plating of the P1. The purpose of the study is to examine the results of open reduction and internal fixation with the use of an AFF (F group) and without (N group, that is, no flap used) in a larger group of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study involving a period of 11 years was conducted involving results of 21 unstable fractures of the P1 of the fingers in 18 patients. In all, 12 fingers were treated without any flap (N group) and 9 fingers were treated with the AFF (F group). For each patient, the total active motion (TAM) ratio, and the grip strength (Jamar) ratio were assessed, and adverse effects and the 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) score were recorded. For statistical analysis, sample characteristics were described using mean ± standard deviation and median, and a Bayesian approach was used for inferential analysis.

RESULTS

In the F group, the TAM ratio (84% ± 13% vs 65% ± 17%) was higher with a lower rate of adverse effects (OR: 0.067, 95% CI, 0.0035-0.58,) and a lower VAS score with evidence of the positive effect of the AFF. The Jamar ratio was similar in the 2 groups (F group 80% ± 25% vs N group 79% ± 19%) with no associated effect of the AFF on grip strength.

CONCLUSIONS

The AFF is a reliable tool to reduce adhesions between plates and the extensor apparatus of the P1 and may be useful to improve finger function after plating of P1 fractures.

TYPE OF STUDY/LOE

Therapeutic, Retrospective, Level IV.

Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery at the peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the UK: a national cohort study

Introduction

This study reports the 30-day mortality, SARS-CoV-2 complication rate and SARS-CoV-2-related hospital processes at the peak of the first wave of the pandemic in the UK.

Methods

This national, multicentre, cohort study at 74 centres in the UK included all patients undergoing any surgery below the elbow at the peak of the UK pandemic. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The secondary outcomes were SARS-CoV-2 complication rates and overall complication rates. A clinician survey relating to SARS-CoV-2 safety processes was carried out for each participating centre.

Results

This analysis includes 1093 patients who underwent upper limb surgery from the 1 to 14 April 2020 inclusively. The overall 30-day mortality was 0.09% (1 pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia) and the mortality of day case surgery was zero. Most centres (96%) screened patients for symptoms prior to admission, only 22% routinely tested for SARS-CoV-2 prior to admission. The SARS-CoV-2 complication rate was 0.18% (2 pneumonias) and the overall complication rate was 6.6% (72 patients). Both SARS-CoV-2-related complications occurred in patients who had been hospitalised for a prolonged period before their surgery and a total of 19 patients (1.7%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive.

Conclusions

The SARS-CoV-2-related complication rate for upper limb surgery even at the peak of the UK pandemic was low at 0.18% and the mortality was zero for patients admitted on the day of surgery. Urgent surgery should not be delayed pending the results of SARS-CoV-2 testing. Routine SARS-CoV-2 testing for day case upper limb surgery not requiring general anaesthesia may be excessive and have unintended negative impacts.

Mini-plate versus Kirschner wire internal fixation for treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a meta-analysis to show the associations of perioperative and postoperative outcomes of mini-plate internal fixation (MPIF) versus Kirschner wire internal fixation (KWIF) for treating metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase from the earliest date of data collection to April 2018. Studies that compared perioperative and postoperative outcomes of MPIF with those of KWIF in patients with metacarpal and phalangeal fractures were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria (n = 2029 patients; 1042 with MPIF and 987 with KWIF). MPIF was related to a greater increase in length of surgery, hospital days, excellent and good rate of outcome, short-form health survey-36 score, and flexion and extension range compared with KWIF. MPIF was related to a greater decrease in intraoperative blood loss, finger visual analog scale score, functional exercise time, fracture healing time, incidence of complications, and postoperative infection rate compared with KWIF.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MPIF have sufficient pressure and strength, and MPIF promotes successful joint fusion and reduces complications of the operation. MPIF is ideal for reduction and stability of patients with metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.

Timing of Debridement and Infection Rates in Open Fractures of the Hand: A Systematic Review

Background: Literature on open fracture infections has focused primarily on long bones, with limited guidelines available for open hand fractures. In this study, we systematically review the available hand surgery literature to determine infection rates and the effect of debridement timing and antibiotic administration. Methods: Searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane computerized literature databases and manual bibliography searches were performed. Descriptive/quantitative data were extracted, and a meta-analysis of different patient cohorts and treatment modalities was performed to compare infection rates. Results: The initial search yielded 61 references. Twelve articles (4 prospective, 8 retrospective) on open hand fractures were included (1669 open fractures). There were 77 total infections (4.6%): 61 (4.4%) of 1391 patients received preoperative antibiotics and 16 (9.4%) of 171 patients did not receive antibiotics. In 7 studies (1106 open fractures), superficial infections (requiring oral antibiotics only) accounted for 86%, whereas deep infections (requiring operative debridement) accounted for 14%. Debridement within 6 hours of injury (2 studies, 188 fractures) resulted in a 4.2% infection rate, whereas debridement within 12 hours of injury (1 study, 193 fractures) resulted in a 3.6% infection rate. Two studies found no correlation of infection and timing to debridement. Conclusions: Overall, the infection rate after open hand fracture remains relatively low. Correlation does exist between the administration of antibiotics and infection, but the majority of infections can be treated with antibiotics alone. Timing of debridement, has not been shown to alter infection rates.

Metacarpal fractures in the athlete

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe current evaluation and treatment of metacarpal fractures in athletes RECENT FINDINGS: Biomechanical and clinical studies involving lower-profile, locking, shorter length, and double-row or separate-dual plate configurations, as well as intramedullary screw fixation, have demonstrated the potential benefits of internal fixation with promising results. Treatment should be customized to the specific athlete and injury, and is often successful without surgery, or with percutaneous pin fixation. Internal fixation of metacarpal fractures has improved with new hardware and new techniques, and may expedite return to play, although further clinical studies are needed.

Surgical Fixation of Fourth and Fifth Metacarpal Shaft Fractures with Flexible Intramedullary Absorbable Rods: Early Clinical Outcomes and Implications

Background:

To avoid the irritation of tendons and soft tissues as well as hardware-related problems, we designed an intramedullary fixation with bioabsorbable rods for the treatment of the metacarpal shaft fractures.

Methods:

Five patients with nine shaft fractures of the fourth and fifth metacarpi were treated with intramedullary absorbable implants and followed up with an average of 4.2 months postoperatively.

Results:

At final follow-up, all patients achieved fracture union with no signs of inflammatory or subcutaneous effusion. There was no shortening, angulatory, or rotatory deformity. There was almost full active extension range of motion (ROM) of the metacarpophalangeal joints while the active flexion ROM of these joints was 80.7 ± 9.6°. Compared with the contralateral hand, the grip strength of the injured hand was 94.0 ± 9.6%. X-rays showed that the arch of the second to fifth metacarpal heads was smooth. There were no intramedullary lytic changes and soft tissue swellings.

Conclusion:

The intramedullary absorbable implants are a safe, simple, and practical treatment for fourth and fifth metacarpal fractures with good early clinical outcomes and no significant complications.

Predictors of Postoperative Finger Stiffness in Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for postoperative finger stiffness after open reduction and internal fixation of unstable proximal phalangeal fractures using a low-profile plate and/or screw system. We hypothesized that dorsal plate placement is a risk factor for postoperative finger stiffness.

METHODS

Seventy consecutive patients (50 men, 20 women; average age, 40 years) with 75 unstable proximal phalangeal fractures were treated with titanium plates and/or screws and evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Thirty-six comminuted fractures and 24 intra-articular fractures were included, and 16 fractures had associated soft-tissue injuries. Plate fixation was performed in 59 fractures, and the remaining 16 were fixed with screws only. The implants were placed in a dorsal location in 33 fractures and in a lateral or volar location in 42 fractures. Finger stiffness was defined as a total active range of finger motion <80% for the treated finger. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on 8 variables: patient characteristics (age and sex), fracture characteristics (fracture comminution, joint involvement, and associated soft-tissue injury), and surgical characteristics (type and location of implants and removal of the implants).

RESULTS

Postoperative finger stiffness occurred in 38 fractures. The multivariate analysis indicated that plate fixation (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-24.0; P = 0.01) and dorsal placement (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-8.3; P = 0.03) were independent risk factors for finger stiffness.

CONCLUSION

We recommend the use of screw fixation as much as possible for unstable proximal phalangeal fractures using a midlateral approach.

Comparison of treatment of oblique and spiral metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with mini plate plus screw or screw only

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare results of treatment of oblique-spiral metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with screw only or mini plate plus screw, respectively.

METHODS

A total of 43 patients who were operated with a diagnosis of displaced, irreducible, unstable, rotational oblique-spiral metacarpal and proximal phalangeal fracture between 2007 and 2010 were included in this study. The mean age of patients with a phalangeal fracture was 33.8 years (range 20-50 years; 4 females, 18 males), and the mean age of patients with a metacarpal fracture was 29.6 years (range 18-45 years; 3 females, 18 males). Mini plate plus screw or screw only was used for internal fixation of these fractures. The patients were followed up for 19.2 ± 5.4 months in the phalangeal fracture group and 20.9 ± 7.3 months in metacarpal fracture group. Of the metacarpal fractures, 14 were oblique and 10 spiral, whereas 14 of the phalangeal fractures were oblique and 8 spiral. The patients were evaluated according to total range of motion of the finger, grasping strength and Q-DASH score.

RESULTS

For patients treated with mini plate plus screw after metacarpal and phalangeal fractures, the time to return to work was significantly shorter in comparison to patients treated with screws only. There was no significant difference between patients with metacarpal fractures treated with mini plate plus screw and patients treated with screw only in terms of total range of motion and Q-DASH results at last on control examination, while results of patients with phalangeal fractures treated with screw only were significantly better. There was no significant difference between these two treatments in phalangeal fractures in terms of grasping strength of the finger in early (1st month) and late (last control examination), whereas patients with metacarpal fractures treated with mini plate plus screw reached higher grasping strength earlier.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with mini plate plus screw should be avoided in spiral and oblique phalangeal fractures, and fixation should be done with screw only with a short surgical incision and dissection. On the other hand, treatment with mini plate plus screw should be preferred in patients with spiral and oblique metacarpal fractures, especially in those who work in occupations requiring higher physical strength.

Can an adipofascial flap be used to prevent adhesions after plating of the proximal phalanx? A case report

Tendon adhesions in zone IV after proximal phalangeal fractures are common and may lead to loss of range of motion at the proximal interphalangeal joint. The type of fracture, surgical technique and rehabilitation strategy also influence the final functional outcome. Plate fixation is a reliable solution in cases of comminuted phalangeal fracture. This article describes how adhesions between the plate and extensor apparatus in cases of comminuted fractures of the proximal phalanx can be reduced by using an adipofascial flap.

Operative treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in athletes: early return to play

BACKGROUND

Evaluating the outcomes of operative treatment for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in athletes returning early to play and discussing the more effective methods that permit rapid early return to athletic activity.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified a total of 105 metacarpal or phalangeal fractures in 105 athletes with conservative or operative treatment in our department. Of these, 20 athletes required an early return to sport because of a pending important game in their competition within 1 month after injury. Therefore, they underwent surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation of metacarpal or phalangeal fractures in an attempt to achieve an early return to their chosen sport at their usual competitive level. The patients included 6 rugby football players, 2 soccer goalkeepers, 3 American football players, 3 handball players, 2 baseball players and 4 who participated in other sports. The clinical records of preoperative and postoperative radiographs were available for all patients, and clinical outcome was evaluated by total active motion (TAM).

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for a mean of 27 (24-43) months. At the latest follow-up examination, bone union was obtained in all cases. In cases with metacarpal and phalangeal fractures, the average TAM was 263° (range 240°-270°).

CONCLUSION

We consider that an early comeback to training and competition can be permitted exclusively for patients with metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. It is important for the attending physician to administer such treatment after obtaining informed consent and develop a trusting relationship with the patient and other related individuals while paying attention to their hope of quick recovery.

Evidence-based medicine: Metacarpal fractures

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Determine the need for operative treatment of metacarpal fractures. (2) Describe the position of immobilization for nonoperative treatment of fifth metacarpal fractures. (3) Assess the differences between intramedullary pinning and transverse pinning of displaced metacarpal fractures. (4) Compare the advantages of plating and pinning for treatment of displaced metacarpal fractures. (5) Recognize appropriate timing and treatment of open metacarpal fractures.

SUMMARY

The body of evidence regarding the treatment of metacarpal fractures continues to grow. Conservative management, closed reduction with percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation, intramedullary fixation, and open reduction and internal fixation with plates and/or screws are all accepted treatment modalities. The goal of this review is to highlight the most recent literature and the best evidence available for the management of metacarpal fractures.

Metacarpal fractures: treatment and complications

Metacarpal fractures comprise between 18-44 % of all hand fractures. Non-thumb metacarpals account for around 88 % of all metacarpal fractures, with the fifth finger most commonly involved [19]. The majority of metacarpal fractures are isolated injuries, which are simple, closed, and stable. While many metacarpal fractures do well without surgery, there is a paucity of literature and persistent controversy to guide the treating physician on the best treatment algorithm. The purpose of this article is to review non-thumb metacarpal anatomy and treatment protocols for nonoperative management of stable fractures, and compare existing literature on surgical techniques for treatment of acute fractures and complications.

Extra-articular fractures of the digital metacarpals and phalanges of the long fingers

Metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of the long fingers are the result of trauma occurring under extremely varied circumstances. As a consequence, the clinical presentation varies greatly, with every bone and joint potentially being involved. Each step of their treatment is crucial, although the benign appearance of these injuries can lead to steps being missed: diagnostic phase with clinical examination and radiographs; therapeutic phase where the most suitable treatment is chosen, which combines mobilization of the digital chains as soon as possible and in every patient; follow-up phase with regular monitoring to detect any complications, especially secondary displacement, and verify that good progress is being made during rehabilitation. The goal of any fracture treatment is to preserve or restore the anatomy, with the emphasis here being on the stability and mobility of the digital chains. The potential progression towards serious functional sequelae (pain, instability or stiffness in hand) and the resulting significant socio-economic repercussions must be at the forefront of a surgeon's mind early on during the initial care of any finger or hand trauma.

Hand fractures: a review of current treatment strategies

Fractures of the tubular bones of the hand are common and potentially debilitating. The majority of these injuries may be treated without an operation. Surgery, however, offers distinct advantages in properly selected cases. We present a review of hand fracture management, with special attention paid to advances since 2008. The history and mechanisms of these fractures are discussed, as are treatment options and common complications. Early mobilization of the fractured hand is emphasized because soft tissue recovery may be more problematic than that of bone.

Predictors of the postoperative range of finger motion for comminuted periarticular metacarpal and phalangeal fractures treated with a titanium plate

BACKGROUND

Plate and screw fixation was introduced for complex fractures of the hand. Several risk factors for a poor functional outcome have been identified, but there is a paucity of evidence regarding predictors of finger stiffness in difficult hand fractures. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to identify independent prognostic factors of the postoperative total active motion (%TAM) in the treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients (62 males, 10 females; 37±15 years) with periarticular fractures involving metaphyseal comminution and displacement were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year following surgery. There were 49 phalangeal bone fractures, 30 intra-articular fractures and 20 associated soft-tissue injuries. The locations of plate placement were lateral in 42 patients and dorsal in 30. The mean duration from injury to surgery was 7.6 days (range, 0-40 days). There were eight examined variables related to patient characteristics (age, gender and hand dominance), fracture characteristics (fracture location, joint involvement and associated soft-tissue injury) and surgical variables (location of plate placement and duration from injury to surgery). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis were used to identify the degree to which variables affect %TAM at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis indicated moderate correlations of %TAM with fracture location, associated soft-tissue injury and age. Multiple linear regression modelling including fracture location, age and associated soft-tissue injury resulted in formulae that could account for 46.3% of the variability in %TAM: fracture location (β=-0.388, p<0.001), age (β=-0.339, p<0.001) and associated soft-tissue injury (β=-0.296, p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Phalangeal fracture, increasing age and associated soft-tissue injury were important risk factors to identify the postoperative %TAM in the treatment of comminuted periarticular metacarpal or phalangeal fracture with a titanium plate.