Evaluation of multidetector computed tomography for penetrating neck injury: a prospective multicenter study

Directed work-up of select penetrating neck injuries is safe: Hard signs continue to soften

INTRODUCTION

Management of penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) has evolved over time, more frequently relying on increased utilization of diagnostic imaging studies. Directed work-up with computed tomography imaging has resulted in increased use of angiography and decreased operative interventions. We sought to evaluate management strategies after directed work-up, hypothesizing increased use of non-operative therapeutic interventions and lower mortality after directed work-up.

METHODS

Patients with PNI from 2017 to 2022 were identified from a single-center trauma registry. Demographics, injuries, physical exam findings, diagnostic studies and interventions were collected. Patients were stratified by presence of hard signs and management strategy [directed work-up (DW) and immediate operative intervention (OR)] and compared. Outcomes included therapeutic non-operative intervention [endovascular stent, embolization, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), or anticoagulation (AC)], non-therapeutic neck exploration, length of stay (LOS), and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 436 patients with PNI, 143 (33%) patients had vascular and/or aerodigestive injuries. Of these, 115 (80%) patients underwent DW and 28 (20%) patients underwent OR. There were no differences in demographics or injury severity score between groups. Patients in the DW group were more likely to undergo vascular stent or embolization (p = 0.040) and had fewer non-therapeutic neck explorations (p = 0.0009), compared to the OR group. There were no differences in post-intervention stroke, leak, or mortality. Sixty percent of patients with vascular hard signs and 78% of patients with aerodigestive hard signs underwent DW.

CONCLUSIONS

Directed work-up in select patients with PNI is associated with fewer non-therapeutic neck explorations. There was no difference in mortality. Selective use of endovascular management, AC and DAPT is safe.

Outcomes of penetrating carotid artery injuries: A South African multicentre study

BACKGROUND

This multicenter study examines the contemporary management of penetrating carotid artery injury (PCAI) to identify trends in management, outcomes, and to determine prognostic factors for stroke and death.

METHODS

Data from three large urban trauma centers in South Africa were retrospectively reviewed for patients who presented with PCAI from 2012 to 2020.

RESULTS

Of 149 identified patients, 137 actively managed patients were included. Twenty-four patients (17.9%) presented in coma and 12 (9.0%) with localizing signs (LS). CT angiography was performed on admission for 120 (87.6%) patients. Thirty patients (21.9%) underwent nonoperative management, 87 (63.5%) open surgery, and 20 (14.6%) endovascular stenting. Eighteen patients (13.1%) died, and 15 (12.6%) surviving patients had strokes. Ligation was significantly related to death and reperfusion to survival. A mechanism of gunshot wound, occlusive injuries, a threatened airway, a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, hard signs of vascular injury, a low GCS, coma, a CT brain demonstrating infarct, a high injury severity score and shock index, a low pH or HCO3, and an elevated lactate were significant independent prognostic factors for death. Ligation was unsurvivable in all patients with severe neurological deficits, whereas reperfusion procedures resulted in survival in 63% (12/19) patients with coma and 78% (7/9) with LS although with high stroke rates (coma: 25.0%, LS: 85.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes in PCAI, including patients with severe neurological deficit and stroke, are better when reperfused. Reperfusion holds the best promise of survival and ligation should be reserved for technically inaccessible bleeding injuries.

Diagnostic approach to penetrating neck trauma: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Diagnostic evaluation of penetrating neck trauma has evolved considerably over the last several decades. The contemporary approach to these injuries is based primarily on clinical signs of injury and multidetector computed tomographic angiography. The neck is evaluated as a unit, rather than relying on the surface anatomy zones in which external injuries are seen to guide the workup of internal injuries. This "no-zone" approach safely spares many patients from negative explorations and unnecessary invasive tests. The purpose of this review is to describe an evidence-based approach to the diagnostic evaluation of penetrating neck trauma, including indications for adjunctive testing beyond physical examination and multidetector computed tomographic angiography.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Literature Synthesis and Expert Opinion; Level V.

Carotid artery penetrating trauma: Report of 4 cases and literature revision

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

In penetrating neck trauma, carotid artery penetrating trauma is considered one of the most complicated injuries to treat. Active bleeding, large hematomas, and rapid occlusion of the airways make the surgical approach to controlling bleeding and repairing the vessel much more complex, constituting an essential clinical challenge to every surgeon.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present 4 cases of patients with carotid artery penetrating trauma. Two patients were treated with endovascular therapy, one with surgery, and the fourth one treated conservatively. None of the patients had posterior neurological impairment.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Carotid artery penetrating trauma is uncommon yet is associated with high rates of mortality and neurological impairment. The common carotid artery is the most frequently injured, and gunshot wounds (GSW) are the most frequent trauma mechanism. Angiotomography (CTA) is the first-line exam for diagnosing these injuries. Treatment should be prompt and individualized and may include conservative techniques, endovascular therapy, and traditional surgical repair.

CONCLUSION

Carotid artery penetrating trauma is an uncommon but complex injury that requires a timely diagnosis and treatment to avoid potentially devastating consequences, particularly in hemodynamically unstable patients. Traditionally, the treatment strategies for these injuries used to be limited to vascular repair or ligation. However, endovascular therapy and conservative management are viable alternatives, which have become more and more useful in selected patients, allowing less invasive approaches with fewer morbidity and acceptable results.

Risk factors for stroke in penetrating cerebrovascular injuries

OBJECTIVE

Penetrating cerebrovascular injuries (PCVI) are associated with a high incidence of mortality and neurological events. The optimal treatment strategy of PCVI, especially when damage control measures are required, remains controversial. The aim of this study was to describe the management of PCVI and patient outcomes at a level 1 trauma center where vascular injuries are managed predominantly by trauma surgeons.

METHODS

An institutional trauma registry was queried for patients with PCVI from 2011 to 2021. Patients with common carotid artery (CCA), internal carotid artery (ICA), or vertebral artery injuries were included for analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and in-hospital stroke or death. A subgroup analysis was completed of arterial repair (primary repair or interposition graft) vs ligation or embolization vs temporary intravascular shunting at the index procedure.

RESULTS

We analyzed 54 patients with PCVI. Overall, the in-hospital stroke rate was 17% and in-hospital mortality was 26%. Twenty-one patients (39%) underwent arterial interventions for PCVI. Ten patients underwent arterial repair, six patients underwent ligation or embolization, and five patients underwent intravascular shunting as a damage control strategy with a plan for delayed repair. The rate of in-hospital stroke was 30% after arterial repair, 0% after arterial ligation or embolization, and 80% after temporary intravascular shunting. There was a significant difference in the stroke rate between the three subgroups (P = .015). Of the 32 patients who did not have an intervention to the CCA, ICA, or vertebral artery, 1 patient with ICA occlusion and 1 patient with CCA intimal injury developed in-hospital stroke. The mortality rate was 0% after arterial repair, 50% after ligation or embolization, and 60% after intravascular shunting. The rate of stroke or death was 30% in the arterial repair group, 50% in the ligation or embolization group, and 100% in the temporary intravascular shunting group.

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of stroke and mortality were seen in patients requiring damage control after PCVI. In particular, temporary intravascular shunting was associated with a high incidence of in-hospital stroke and a 100% rate of stroke or death. Further investigation is needed into the factors related to these finding and whether the use of temporary intravascular shunting in PCVI is an advisable strategy.

Prognostic Significance of Multifactorial Analysis in Complex Cervical Aero-Digestive Trauma Cases

Background and Objectives: In the context of complex aerodigestive cervical traumas, the prognosis and outcome heavily depend on risk factors, particularly injuries to the larynx, trachea, major digestive tissues, cervical vertebrae, and vascular structures. With the increasing prevalence of trauma as a public health concern, there is a pressing need for epidemiological research and the implementation of preventative measures. The purpose of this research is to establish the profile of the predictable impact factors that determine the prognosis of patients with complex cervical trauma. Methods and Methods: The study group consisted of 106 patients with complex cervical trauma pathology developed by various mechanisms such as car accidents, home-related accidents, aggression, gunshot wounds, and self-inflicted attempts, resulting in hospitalization in the E.N.T. Clinic at "St. Spiridon" Iași Hospital, from 2012 to 2016; medical records were the source of the collected data. Results: Hemodynamic instability upon admission associated with age, muscle and laryngeal injuries, and anemia were identified as negative prognostic factors. Additionally, the utilization of imaging-based paraclinical investigations for diagnosing traumatic lesions emerged as a positive prognostic factor in managing this pathology. The management of penetrating cervical trauma remains a subject of debate, with some advocating for surgical exploration beyond the platysma layer in all cases, while others argue for a more selective conservative approach due to a high rate of negative explorations. Conclusions: The statistical evaluation of epidemiological, clinical, lesion, paraclinical, and therapeutic parameters is needed to establish predictable risk factors in the prognosis of complex aerodigestive cervical trauma.

Penetrating Head and Neck Trauma: A Narrative Review of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Treatment Protocols

Penetrating injury to the head and neck accounts for a minority of trauma but significant morbidity in the US civilian population. The 3-zone anatomical framework has historically guided evaluation and management; however, the most current evidence-based protocols favor a no-zone, systems-based approach. In stable patients, a thorough physical examination and noninvasive imaging should be prioritized, with surgical exploration of the head and neck reserved for certain circumstances. Diagnostic and management decisions should be tailored to the mechanism of injury, history, physical examination, experience of personnel, availability of equipment, and clinical judgment.

Management and outcomes of military penetrating neck injuries: An eleven-year retrospective case note review

INTRODUCTION

Penetrating Neck Injuries (PNIs) affected 3.2% of trauma patients attending US and UK deployed medical treatment facilities (MTFs) during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. Injured military personnel requiring aeromedical evacuation for such injuries were managed at the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM), Birmingham, UK. The aim of this paper was to review the management of PNI in both deployed MTFs and when evacuated back to the UK.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective case note review was performed of all military patients who sustained PNI whilst on deployment overseas, and who were subsequently evacuated to RCDM between March 2003 and December 2014.

RESULTS

Forty casualties who sustained PNI were identified, of which 28/40 (70%) sustained injury from explosive fragmentation, and 11/40 (28%) from gunshot wounds. Hard signs of PNI were present in 3/40 (7.5%) patients, soft signs in 14/40 (35%), no signs in 12/40 (30%), and unknown signs in 11/40 (28%) patients. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was used in 39/40 (98%) patients, and was effective at ruling out significant injury, with 100% (29/29) of casualties with a negative CTA not developing vascular or aerodigestive injury. There were 9/29 (31%) patients who had surgical neck exploration despite both a negative CTA and absence of hard signs of PNI. There were 12/40 (30%) patients who required operative intervention at RCDM.

CONCLUSION

UK military surgeons in Role 3 MTFs had a low threshold for surgical exploration, even in the absence of CT findings or hard signs. This was likely due to the high-energy mechanisms responsible for military PNI, in addition to the limited availability of equipment and clinical expertise in visualising the larynx.

Natural history and nonoperative management of penetrating cerebrovascular injury

INTRODUCTION

There is a modern precedent for nonoperative management of select penetrating cerebrovascular injuries (PCVIs); however, there is minimal data to guide management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study assessed treatments, radiographic injury progression, and outcomes for all patients with PCVIs managed at an urban Level I trauma center from 2016 to 2021 that underwent initial nonoperative management (NOM).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were included. There were 11,635 trauma admissions, 378 patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury, and 18 patients with operatively-managed PCVI during this timeframe. All patients received antithrombotic therapy, but this was delayed in some due to concomitant injuries. Three patients had stroke (21%): two before antithrombotic initiation, and one with unclear timing relative to treatment. Three patients underwent endovascular interventions. On follow-up imaging, 14% had injury resolution, 36% were stable, 21% worsened, and 29% had no follow-up vascular imaging. One patient died (7%), one had a bleeding complication (7%), and no patient required delayed operative intervention.

DISCUSSION

Early initiation of antithrombotic therapy, early surveillance imaging, and selective use of endovascular interventions are important for nonoperative management of PCVI.

Role of imaging in penetrating vascular injuries of the craniocervical region

Penetrating vascular injury has become the topic of interest with increased gun violence in the United States. The radiologist plays a crucial role in establishing and systemizing the signs of vascular injury such as intimal flap, dissection, pseudoaneurysm, rupture, and arteriovenous fistula. Various imaging techniques such as ultrasound Doppler, computed tomographic angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography, and conventional angiography are being employed based on clinical recommendations. Of all the techniques, CTA has been shown to embrace a promising role in identifying vascular injuries with superior sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. An acquaintance of the imaging features has been shown to improve the approach to trauma patients in clinical settings. This article details the imaging modalities and the features of the head-and-neck penetrating vascular injury.

Case report: Tree branch penetrating injury into zone III of the neck

INTRODUCTION

Penetrating trauma to the neck can result in severe morbidity and mortality. Location of the injury dictates the appropriate clinical management. Challenging traumatic injuries require resourceful treatment options.

CASE PRESENTATION

A complex traumatic case of a foreign body penetrating the neck, the parotid gland, disrupting the internal jugular vein, with the tip resting at the anterior aspect of the C1 ring is reported. In this case, the authors seek to describe the clinical management of a vascular injury that resulted from penetrating zone III of the neck.

DISCUSSION

Due to the complex and dense presence of various structures in the neck, injuries can be difficult to manage. Thus, an algorithm identifies management strategies that are based on the location of the injury, signs of vascular injury, identified injured structures and the hemodynamic stability of the patient. Balloon tamponade has been described in other organs of the body and might be a therapeutic option in patients were venous injuries are difficult to access.

CONCLUSION

Penetrating neck injuries continue to result in significant morbidity and mortality. However, with appropriate and efficient evaluation and management, better outcomes are expected as demonstrated in this case.

Manejo conservador de lesión aerodigestiva: reporte de un caso y revisión de la literatura

Introducción. El trauma penetrante de cuello representa un evento desafortunado de baja incidencia y alta complejidad diagnóstica y terapéutica, lo que supone un reto para el cirujano general. Caso clínico. Paciente femenina de 20 años de edad, quien sufrió una herida cervical por proyectil de arma de fuego, desarrollando de forma secundaria una lesión aerodigestiva. Se realizó un tratamiento expectante en un hospital de alta complejidad, con una evolución favorable. Discusión. En la literatura existe un claro debate en cuanto al manejo de las lesiones penetrantes en cuello y la sospecha de lesión orgánica oculta. En nuestro paciente la lesión aerodigestiva fue tratada mediante observación y seguimiento clínico. Conclusiones. El manejo de un paciente con lesión aerodigestiva se puede corroborar mediante las imágenes diagnósticas y se puede tratar de forma expectante con un resultado exitoso, sin agregar morbilidad y con un impacto adecuado en el buen uso de los recursos disponibles.

Computed tomography angiography for aerodigestive injuries in penetrating neck trauma: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Management of hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating neck trauma (PNT) has evolved in recent years with improvements in imaging technology. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) encompassing all zones of the neck has become part of the standard diagnostic algorithm for PNT patients who do not require immediate surgical intervention for vascular or aerodigestive injuries (ADI). Several studies have demonstrated favorable operating characteristics for CTA at excluding arterial injuries; however, consensus as to CTA's ability to detect ADI is lacking. We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO registration number CRD42019133509) to answer the question Is CTA sufficient to rule out ADI in hemodynamically stable PNT patients without hard signs?

METHODS

Investigators independently searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from their inception to August 2020 for the search terms "penetrating neck injuries" and "CT scan." To be included, studies required sufficient data to construct a 2×2 table of CTA for ADI. The operating characteristics of CTA for detecting ADIs are reported as sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Bias in our studies was quantified by QUADAS-2.

RESULTS

Our search identified 1,242 citations with seven studies with moderate to high risk of bias meeting our inclusion/exclusion criteria and encompassing 877 subjects with an ADI prevalence of 13.4%. CTA for ADI had sensitivity of 92% (95% CI = 85% to 97%), specificity of 88% (95% CI = 85% to 90%), positive likelihood ratio of 12.2 (95% CI = 4.6 to 32), and negative LR of 0.14 (95% CI = 0.05 to 0.37). Of the 26 identified esophageal injuries across our studies that were diagnosed by either swallow studies or surgical exploration, five (19%, 95% CI = 8.1% to 38.3%) were initially missed by CTA.

CONCLUSION

CTA alone is not sufficient to exclude esophageal injuries in PNT. Because delayed diagnosis is associated with increased morbidity, additional diagnostic interventions should be undertaken if there is remaining concern for esophageal injury.

Pre-hospital management of penetrating neck injuries: a scoping review of current evidence and guidance

Penetrating injuries to the neck pose a unique challenge to clinicians due to the proximity of multiple significant anatomical structures with little protective soft tissue coverage. Injuries to this area, whilst low in incidence, are potentially devastating. Respiratory, vascular, gastro-oesophageal and neurological structures may all be involved, either in isolation or combination. These injuries are particularly difficult to manage in the resource poor, often austere and/or remote, pre-hospital environment. A systematic scoping review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the current available research pertaining to managing this injury profile, prior to the patient arriving in the emergency department. The available research is discussed in sections based on the commonly used trauma management acronym ‘cABCD’ (catastrophic haemorrhage, Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability) to facilitate a systematic approach and clinical evaluation familiar to clinicians. Based on the available reviewed evidence, we have proposed a management algorithm for this cohort of patients. From this we plan to instigate a Delphi process to develop a consensus statement on the pre-hospital management of this challenging presentation.

Civilian Penetrating Neck Trauma at a Level I Trauma Centre: A Five-Year Retrospective Case Note Review

OBJECTIVES

To report the experience of civilian penetrating neck trauma (PNT) at a UK level I trauma centre, propose an initial management algorithm and assess the degree of correlation between clinical signs of injury, operative findings, and radiological reports.

DESIGN

Retrospective case note review SETTING: UK level I trauma centre April 2012-November 2017 PARTICIPANTS: 310 cases of PNT were drawn from electronic patient records. Data was extracted on hard and soft signs of vascular or aerodigestive tract injury, clinical management, radiological imaging and patient outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, morbidity and mortality. The correlation between clinical signs, and radiological reports to internal injury on surgical exploration.

RESULTS

271 (87.4%) male and 39 (13.6%) female patients with a mean age 36 years (16 - 87) were identified. The most common causes of injury were assault 171 (55.2%) and deliberate self-harm 118 (38%). A knife was the most common instrument 240 (77.4%). Past psychiatric history was noted in 119 (38.4%) and 60 (19.4%) were intoxicated. 50% were definitively managed in theatre with a negative exploration rate of 38%, and 50% were managed in ED. Pre-operative radiological reports correlated with operative reports in 62% of cases with venous injury the most common positive and negative finding. Multivariate correlation was r=0.89, p=0.045 between hard signs plus positive radiology findings and internal injury on neck exploration.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of PNT by clinical and radiological signs is safe and effective, and can be streamlined by a decision-making algorithm as proposed here.

Endovascular Considerations in Traumatic Injury of the Carotid and Vertebral Arteries

Cervical carotid and vertebral artery traumatic injuries can have a devastating natural history. This article reviews the epidemiology, mechanisms of injury, clinical presentation, and classification systems pertinent to consideration of endovascular treatment. The growing role of modern endovascular techniques for the treatment of these diseases is presented to equip endovascular surgeons with a framework for critically assessing patients presenting with traumatic cervical cerebrovascular injury.

Computed tomography angiography in the "no-zone" approach era for penetrating neck trauma: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Penetrating neck trauma (PNT) continues to present a diagnostic dilemma. Practice guidelines advocate the use of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for suspected vascular or aerodigestive injuries in all neck zones. There is also an evolving evidence of "no-zone" approach where the decision to obtain a CTA is guided by physical examination findings and clinical presentation. The aim of this systematic review was to examine existing literature on the diagnostic accuracy of CTA as an integral component of the no-zone approach in stable patients with PNT.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review using an electronic search of three databases (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Review) from 2000 to 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 5 prospective and 8 retrospective studies were included. The sensitivity of CTA ranged from 83% to 100%; specificity, from 61% to 100%; positive predictive value, from 30% to 100%; and negative predictive value, from 90% to 100%. Three studies reported high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of vascular injuries but low specificity for aerodigestive tract injuries. When stratified by clinical presentation, CTA had a sensitivity of 89.5% to 100% and specificity of 61% to 100% in stable patients presenting with soft signs (SSs). In a combined group of stable patients with either hard signs (HSs) or SSs, the sensitivity of CTA was 94.4% to 100% and the specificity was 96.7% to 100%. Among patients presenting with HSs, the sensitivity of CTA was 78.6% to 90% and the specificity was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic review to examine the role of CTA in PNT. In combination with physical examination, CTA demonstrated a reliable high sensitivity and specificity for detecting injuries in PNT in stable patients with SSs of injury and select patients with HSs of injury. These results support the management of PNT using no-zone approach based on physical examination and the use of CTA in stable patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review, level IV.

An unusual case of a penetrating neck injury (PNI) illustrating the use of a "no zone" approach for the management of this injury and a review of the literature

We present an unusual case of a young male with a penetrating neck injury (PNI) due to a work-related injury. A metallic foreign body traversed from entry at surgical Zone 2 to Zone 1 in the neck and resulted in a transection of the left thyrocervical trunk at the origin with the left subclavian artery. Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) of the aortic arch and major branch vessels demonstrated haemorrhage anterior to the left subclavian artery and left thyrocervical trunk. We describe some of the diagnostic and operative challenges which may occur in these rare and life-threatening injuries. We have also reviewed some of the recent key literature on this topic and have collated the recommendations of the review.

In recent years, there has been a movement away from selective “zone-based” mandatory surgical exploration for Zone 2 injuries, as well as invasive and time-consuming investigations (such as digital subtraction angiography, contrast oesophageal swallow and bronchoscopy) for Zone 1 and 3 injuries due to the high number of negative surgical procedures and investigations. We demonstrate there is now an evidence-based algorithm which demonstrates that a “no zone” approach to the management of these patients is safe and effective. This requires an initial physical examination looking for the presence or absence of “hard”, “soft” or “no” physical signs in these patients, and then deciding on subsequent management which would include immediate surgery, CTA of the aortic arch and branches (and subsequent surgical or other management) or observation only.

Our aim in describing this case it to highlight that there is now good evidence-based guidance for the safe and effective management of patients with this infrequent but potentially fatal injury.

About an unusual penetrating cervical wound:Iron bar

Introduction

The majority of cervical wounds are linked to aggressions and attempted autolysis by knives or firearms.

Case presentation

the story is about a 35 -year-old man admitted to the emergency room for a penetrating cervical wound following an accidental fall in the workplace. The extremely long iron bar (concrete)has penetrated its neck on the right side.upon admission, the patient was conscious,hemodynamically and respiratory stable without sensory-motor deficit.

Surgical exploration is urgently decided under general anesthesia, from wich the foreign body is successfully removed.A follow -up examination at 4 months was without particularity.

Discussion

Penetrating neck injuries caused by objects such as rods or iron bars pose a significantly high risk of serious neurological damage.

Penetrating neck injuries can be life-threatening and functional.the extent of the lesions must be assessed precisely before removing the foreign body.

Conclusion

we report an exceptional case of a penetrating neck wound caused by a concrete iron bar.treatment should always be multidisciplinary and giving priority to vital structures and function.

•

The majority of cervical wounds are linked to aggressions and attempted autolysis by knives or firearms.

•

The management of trauma to the penetrating neck has gone from compulsory exploration of the neck to selective management.

•

The care is multidisciplinary because it calls upon several stakeholders to know: the surgeon of head and neck, vascular surgeon and anesthesiologist and only an early appropriate treatment can reduce the sequel.

'No zone' approach to the management of stable penetrating neck injuries: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Aim: to review outcomes of the 'no zone' approach to penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) with the advent of high-fidelity computed tomography-angiography (CT-A) in order to determine the most appropriate management for stable PNIs.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

POPULATION

Retrospective and prospective cohort studies of patients who sustained penetrating neck trauma, as defined by an injury which penetrates the platysma, and whose initial management involved CT-A evaluation.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed in July 2019 using the following databases: Pubmed Central, EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane CENTRAL. Only studies published in English from the last 15 years were included.

RESULTS

Nine cohort studies met inclusion criteria. There has been an increase in CT-A focussed evaluation of PNIs in recent years. CT-A is a highly sensitive and specific imaging choice and reduces negative neck exploration rates. A new management algorithm for stable patients involving initial radiological assessment using CT-A, and subsequent selective surgical exploration, is safe and effective.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review provide level 2A evidence that the 'no zone' approach to PNIs, complemented by CT-A and thorough clinical assessment, is a safe management strategy which reduces negative neck exploration rates.

Neurovascular trauma: Diagnosis and therapy

Traumatic cerebrovascular injuries are common in both military and civilian populations. Whether such injuries occur in the aftermath of blunt or penetrating trauma has major implications for characteristics, classification, diagnosis, and optimal management of these lesions. Advances in screening methods, including particularly the dramatic rise of high-quality CT angiography, have facilitated early detection of these lesions. Fortunately, these diagnostic advances have occurred alongside improvements in pharmacological treatment and endovascular intervention, which now play an important role alongside surgical intervention in reducing the likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes. While the management of victims of trauma remains challenging, improved understanding of and ability to appropriately manage traumatic cerebrovascular lesions promises to yield better clinical outcomes for these vulnerable patients.

The efficacy of the "no zone" approach for the assessment of traumatic neck injury: a case-control study

Purpose

Recently, several studies have demonstrated symptom-based, non-zonal algorithms for approaching penetrating neck injuries. The purpose of this study was to confirm the effectiveness of the “no zone” approach in traumatic neck injuries.

Methods

Medical charts of patients with traumatic neck injuries who presented at the Regional Trauma Center in South Korea between January 2014 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Negative final neck findings (FNFs) were compared with positive FNFs (which include major vascular, aerodigestive, nerve, endocrine gland, cartilage, or hyoid bone injuries) using multivariate logistic regression analysis including values of the “zone” and/or no zone approach.

Results

Out of 168 trauma patients, 70 patients with a minor injury and 7 patients under the age of 18 years were excluded. Of the remaining 91 patients, 74 (81.3%) had penetrating neck injuries and 17 (18.7%) had blunt neck injuries. Initial diagnosis most frequently revealed external wounds in zone II (84.6%). Twenty (22.0%) and 36 (39.5%) patients had hard and soft signs, respectively, using the no zone approach. Further, there was a significant difference between the negative and positive FNFs in patients with hard signs (11.6% vs. 54.5%; P < 0.01, respectively). According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the hard signs were associated with an odds ratio (OR) for FNFs (OR, 18.92; 95% confidence interval, 3.55–157.60).

Conclusion

Traumatic neck injuries classified as having hard signs based on the no zone approach may be correlated with internal organ injuries of the neck.

Correlation between the level of the external wound and the internal injury in penetrating neck injury does not favour an initial zonal management approach

Background

Many current protocols for managing penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) still suggest zonal approaches. This study was undertaken to determine the correlation between the zone of the external wound and the level of the internal injury, and to verify whether a ‘no‐zone’ approach to PNI is valid.

Methods

Patients admitted with a PNI to a tertiary trauma care centre between January 2011 and May 2018 were identified from a trauma database. Those with confirmed injury to the vascular system or an aerodigestive tract injury (ADTI) were included in the study. The medical records of each patient were reviewed with regard to the zone of the external wound and the level of internal injury, and the findings were compared.

Results

In the period under review, 1075 patients were treated for a PNI. Of these, 298 (27·7 per cent) had a confirmed vascular injury or ADTI and were included in the cohort. In 176 patients (59·1 per cent) the site of the internal injury was in the same zone as the external wound. In a further 70 patients (23·5 per cent) there was no correlation between the site of the internal injury and the external wound, and in the remaining 52 patients (17·4 per cent) the correlation could not be determined. In this cohort, all clinically assessable patients with significant injuries had either physical signs suggestive of injury or deep surgical emphysema on radiological examination.

Conclusion

An approach to PNI based on zones is questionable, and this study supports a no‐zone approach based on imaging guided by clinical examination.

Value of clinical examination in the assessment of penetrating neck injuries: a retrospective study of diagnostic accuracy test

Background

There are many high-volume trauma centers in limited resource environments where a thorough clinical examination of patients may contribute to a more economical, accurate, and widely applicable method of determining the proper management of patients with penetrating neck injuries. The purpose of this study was to validate thorough physical examination as a reliable diagnostic tool in these patients.

Methods

We performed an observational retrospective study of a diagnostic accuracy test where we compared clinical findings (symptoms and soft signs on admission of the patient) with the definitive findings according to the gold standard test for each particular situation (selective studies, clinical observation and surgical exploration). The study was conducted at Hospital Occidente Kennedy (HOK) between August 2009 and June 2010.

Results

The sample consisted of the clinical records of 207 (n = 207) patients who went to the emergency room for penetrating neck wounds at Hospital Occidente Kennedy (HOK). Of the total sample, 36.2% (n = 75) of patients were considered “asymptomatic” as they didn’t present with any soft signs of injury. Vascular soft signs were present in 57% (n = 118) of the patients, soft signs of the airway and the upper gastrointestinal tract were present in 15.9% (n = 33) and 21.3% (n = 44) of the patients respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of any soft sign to determine injuries which require surgical repair was 97.4% [CI] [86.5–99.5%] and 98.7% [CI] [92.8–99.8%] respectively, with a range of confidence [CI] of 95%.

Conclusions

Our study’s main findings suggest that patients with neck injuries and no vascular, airway, or gastrointestinal soft sign can be safely managed with a conservative approach. It is important to emphasize the value of the clinical examination since there are many contexts in the modern world where a considerable amount of the population is afflicted by neck trauma and treated under conditions where technological resources are limited.

Penetrating neck trauma with common carotid artery injury caused by a percussive drill: A case report

RATIONALE

Penetrating neck traumas are dangerous and have a high mortality rate, particularly in patients with common carotid artery injuries. Advances in diagnostic imaging technology have shifted management of penetrating neck injuries from mandatory exploration to selective management. The question is now regarding optimal selection of auxiliary examinations to assess "stability" rapidly and guide clinics in managing such patients.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 56-year-old man suffered neck trauma with the right common carotid artery caused by a percussive drill. The carotid artery could not be clearly displayed in computed tomography (CT) angiography imaging.

DIAGNOSES

Penetrating neck trauma due to percussive drill bit with common carotid artery injury.

INTERVENTIONS

X-ray and bedside duplex ultrasound with color Doppler flow imaging were used to assess the state of trauma and the foreign body was removed under general anesthesia.

OUTCOMES

The patient was discharged at postoperative day 10 with no complication. The patient had no sequelae from this injury at 6-month follow up.

LESSONS

X-ray provides a comprehensive assessment of damage, and can efficiently detect foreign bodies in the skull and cervical vertebrae. Duplex ultrasound to be a viable method to exclude macrovascular injury in unstable patients who are not eligible for computed tomography angiography (CTA) or catheter angiography imaging. Widely available duplex ultrasound and x-ray should be considered in emergency situations.

Management of cervical tracheoesophageal injuries: A 2018 EAST Master Class Video Presentation

This video techniques article focuses on the choice of incision, and repair techniques, for cervical injuries to the trachea and esophagus.

Penetrating Pharyngoesophageal Injury: Practice Patterns in the Era of Nonoperative Management - A National Trauma Data Bank Review from 2007 to 2011

Introduction: Selective nonoperative management of neck injuries from penetrating mechanism has become an acceptable management strategy. We herein characterize current management strategies of cervical pharyngoesophageal injuries implemented by trauma surgeons in the United States. Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank datasets 2007-2011 were queried for penetrating pharyngeal and/or cervical esophageal injuries. Subjects surviving 24 hours or more were analyzed based on whether a surgical exploration was pursued and by gunshot versus stabbing mechanism. Results: In all, 1,256 patients were identified, representing 6% of all penetrating neck injuries during the study period. The majority (84%) were male, with a median age of 27 years. Injury severity was high (median score of 14). Compared to stabbing victims, gunshot patients were more likely to have associated cervical spine (24% vs. 1%, p < .01) and carotid artery injury (14% vs. 9%, p < .01). Neck exploration was performed in 49% of patients who survived at least 24 hours, with 90% occurring within the first day of admission. Of patients who underwent a delayed neck exploration, 35% required a tracheostomy and 41% required a feeding tube placement. The overall mortality was 4%. Nonoperative management was not associated with increased odds for death (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.55, p = .17). Conclusions: Nonoperative management of penetrating pharyngoesophageal injuries is commonly utilized with no effect on mortality.

Airway Management of Near-Complete Tracheal Transection by Through-the-Wound Intubation: A Case Report

We present an approach to airway management in a patient with machete injuries culminating in near-complete cricotracheal transection, in addition to a gunshot wound to the neck. Initial airway was established by direct intubation through the cricotracheal wound. Once the airway was secured, a bronchoscopy-guided orotracheal intubation was performed with simultaneous retraction of the cricotracheal airway to optimize the surgical field. This case offers insight into a rarely performed approach to airway management. Furthermore, our case report demonstrates that, in select airway injuries, performing through-the-wound intubation engenders a multitude of benefits.

Traumatic Penetrating Neck Injury with Right Common Carotid Artery Dissection and Stenosis Effectively Managed with Stenting: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Introduction

Penetrating neck injuries (PNI) are common and associated with arterial and other neuronal injuries. Although many authors have written on penetrating and blunt carotid artery injuries as a result of PNI or traumatic neck injuries, no one has reported a case or case series on PNI that resulted in blunt carotid dissection and stenosis.

Case Presentation

We present a case of 40-year-old building and construction male worker who slipped and fell on an iron rod that resulted in penetrating wound on the right side of the anterior neck a week prior to presenting at our facility. He pulled out the iron rod immediately. Computer tomography angiography (CTA) done revealed C2-C4 transverse process fractures on the right side and a fracture at the right lamina of C3 and right common carotid artery dissection with stenosis. He was successfully treated with stenting via endovascular approach.

Conclusions

We adopt the view that patient should never pull out objects that result in PNI because of complex neurovascular architecture of the neck. The mortality rate of our patient will have doubled if the iron rode penetrated the common carotid artery. The gold standard treatment option for carotid artery dissection and stenosis is endovascular approaches.

Management of post-traumatic retained hemothorax

Introduction

Chest injuries occur in a significant portion of trauma patients and hemothorax is a common result. While the initial management of traumatic hemothorax is most commonly treated with tube thoracostomy, the management of retained hemothorax is a subject of debate. Recent literature has proposed different methods for treating or preventing retained hemothorax, yet the approach to this pathology is not straightforward.

Methods

The literature was reviewed for relevant studies regarding the prevention and management of post-traumatic retained hemothorax. What follows is a review of the recent literature and an algorithm for the approach to treating a traumatic retained hemothorax.

Results

Identifying a traumatic retained hemothorax and preventing subsequent complications such as pneumonia, empyema, and fibrothorax are significant issues faced by surgeons. Studies for preventing retained hemothorax have focused on initial chest tube size, location, and peri-procedural placement conditions, as well as thoracic lavage. Several treatment modalities exist, including second drainage procedure and intra-pleural fibrinolytic drug instillation, but video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is the most common and successful approach. Regardless of the approach to evacuation, early intervention is paramount.

Conclusion

Further studies will help characterize appropriate candidates, timing, treatment modalities, and guide therapy for retained hemothorax.

Radiographically occult perforation and dissection of the common carotid artery following stab injury to the neck

In recent years, many diagnostic algorithms have been devised to reduce the rate of negative explorations associated with indiscriminate surgical management of penetrating neck injuries. In hemodynamically stable patients, the need for surgical intervention is usually determined by integrating both clinical signs and radiological findings; if such investigations remain unremarkable, recommended treatment consists in close observation and sequential physical examinations. We report on a 29-year-old male who was admitted to a Swiss tertiary care hospital after sustaining a penetrating injury to his left neck following a knife attack. Disregarding a pre-hospital account of hemorrhage from the wound and slight dysphagia, no manifest symptoms or signs of internal organ damage were present on primary survey. Moreover, there was no evidence of vascular or aerodigestive tract injury on initial CT angiography. We nonetheless proceeded with immediate surgical exploration, exposing a significant perforation of the left common carotid artery with concomitant dissection of the said vessel. Surgical repair was successfully performed and the patient suffered no long-term sequelae. We thus recommend that a high level of suspicion be upheld in both asymptomatic and oligosymptomatic patients with PNI and that clinical practitioners remain cautious in the face of deceptively reassuring radiologic findings.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Penetrating Neck Injury

In patients with penetrating neck injuries with clinical soft injury signs, and patients with hard signs of injury who do not require immediate surgery, CT angiography of the neck is the preferred imaging procedure to evaluate extent of injury. Other modalities, such as radiography and fluoroscopy, catheter-based angiography, ultrasound, and MR angiography have their place in the evaluation of the patient, depending on the specific clinical situation and question at hand. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Management of Major Vascular Injuries: Neck, Extremities, and Other Things that Bleed

Vascular injuries represent a significant burden of mortality and disability. Blunt injuries to the neck vessels can present with signs of stroke either immediately or in a delayed fashion. Most injuries are detected with computed tomography angiography and managed with either antiplatelet medications or anticoagulation. In contrast, patients with penetrating injuries to the neck vessels require airway management, hemorrhage control, and damage control resuscitation before surgical repair. The keys to diagnosis and management of peripheral vascular injury include early recognition of the injury; hemorrhage control with direct pressure, packing, or tourniquets; and urgent surgical consultation.

Computed Tomography Angiography is the Definitive Vascular Imaging Modality for Penetrating Neck Injury: A South African Experience

Background and Aims:

Computed tomography angiography has become central to the diagnostic algorithm for penetrating neck injury, but despite its widespread use the literature to support this adoption is limited. We reviewed our experience with computed tomography angiography for the identification of vascular trauma in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating neck injury at a major trauma center in South Africa.

Materials and Methods:

A prospectively kept trauma registry capturing data in real time was retrospectively reviewed. All patients with penetrating neck injury investigated with computed tomography angiography as the initial vascular investigation during a 47-month period were included.

Results:

A total of 380 patients were included. Indications for computed tomography angiography were as follows: hard signs (13), soft signs (201), no signs but proximity/zone I or III wounds (141), and undefined signs of vascular injury (25). Of the 380 scans, 7 (1.8%) were indeterminate, 299 (78.7%) negative, and 74 (19.5%) positive for a vascular injury (54 arterial and 20 isolated venous injury). Eight were false positive and 4 false negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for detecting arterial injury were 93.9%, 97.5%, 85.2%, and 99.1%, respectively. Overall, the yield for demonstrating “true arterial injury” was 12.1% (46/380); hard signs: 76.9% (10/13), soft signs: 16.4% (33/201), and no signs: 2.1% (3/141) which all were secondary to gunshot wounds). Only 8.4% (32/380) required intervention for arterial injury and none for isolated venous injury (hard signs: 62.0%, soft signs: 11.4%, and no signs: 0.7%). No serious complications resulted from computed tomography angiography.

Conclusion:

Computed tomography angiography is a safe and effective imaging modality for the investigation of vascular trauma post penetrating neck injury. Asymptomatic patients with stab wounds do not need to be imaged regardless of proximity concerns. Symptomatic stable patients including a subgroup with hard signs should be imaged rather than explored. Computed tomography angiography provides an interventional road map and can identify injuries amenable to endovascular or conservative management.

"No zone" approach in penetrating neck trauma reduces unnecessary computed tomography angiography and negative explorations

BACKGROUND

The most recent management guidelines advocate computed tomography angiography (CTA) for any suspected vascular or aero-digestive injuries in all zones and give zone II injuries special consideration. We hypothesized that physical examination can safely guide CTA use in a "no zone" approach.

METHODS

An 8-year retrospective analysis of all adult trauma patients with penetrating neck trauma (PNT) was performed. We included all patients in whom the platysma was violated. Patients were classified into three groups as follows: hard signs, soft signs, and asymptomatic. CTA use, positive CTA (contrast extravasation, dissection, or intimal flap) and operative details were reported. Primary outcomes were positive CTA and therapeutic neck exploration (TNE) (defined by repair of major vascular or aero-digestive injuries).

RESULTS

A total of 337 patients with PNT met the inclusion criteria. Eighty-two patients had hard signs and all of them went to the operating room, of which 59 (72%) had TNE. One hundred fifty-six patients had soft signs, of which CTA was performed in 121 (78%), with positive findings in 12 (10%) patients. The remaining 35 (22%) underwent initial neck exploration, of which 14 (40%) were therapeutic yielding a high rate of negative exploration. Ninty-nine patients were asymptomatic, of which CTA was performed in 79 (80%), with positive findings in 3 (4%), however, none of these patients required TNE. On sub analysis based on symptoms, there was no difference in the rate of TNE between the neck zones in patients with hard signs (P = 0.23) or soft signs (P = 0.51). Regardless of the zone of injury, asymptomatic patients did not require a TNE.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical examination regardless of the zone of injury should be the primary guide to CTA or TNE in patients with PNT. Following traditional zone-based guidelines can result in unnecessary negative explorations in patients with soft signs and may need rethinking.

Current opinion in otolaryngology: update on vascular injuries in craniomaxillofacial fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The primary purpose of this chapter is to define current recommendations for vascular work-up of patients with craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma with emphasis on imaging to include intraoperative fluorescence, angiography, and surgical exploration. The second goal is to review current management recommendations for observation versus surgical exploration based on the neck zones of injury.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past two decades, endovascular techniques are increasingly utilized, particularly in zones I and III of the neck. Additionally, modern advances in radiographic technology have allowed for selective exploration of penetrating zone II injuries. A high suspicion for blunt cerebrovascular injury should be maintained for patients with high-speed deceleration mechanisms of injury, with a majority of patients managed with medical therapy or conservative monitoring over surgical intervention.

SUMMARY

CMF fractures are associated with vascular injuries to the intracranial carotid system, extracranial carotid system, or vertebral artery system. A thorough understanding of at risk patients, optimal work-up, and timely treatment algorithms is imperative given the devastating sequellae of stroke and death.

Surgical Management of Vascular Trauma

Vascular injuries remain among the most challenging entities encountered in trauma care. Improvements in diagnostic capabilities, resuscitation approaches, vascular techniques, and prosthetic device options have afforded considerable advancement in the care of these patients. This evolution in care capabilities continues. Despite advances, uncontrolled hemorrhage due to major vascular injury remains one of the most common causes of death after trauma. Successful management of vascular injury requires the timely diagnosis and control of bleeding sources; to facilitate this task, trauma providers must appreciate the capabilities and limitations of diagnostic imaging modalities. Trauma providers must understand when and how to effectively apply these strategies.

Safety in selective surgical exploration in penetrating neck trauma

BACKGROUND

Selective management of penetrating neck injuries has been considered the standard of care with minimal risks to patient safety. In a previous non-randomized prospective study conducted at our center, selective management proved to be safe and reduced unnecessary exploratory cervicotomies. In the present study, the role of clinical examination and selective diagnostic tests were assessed by reviewing demographic and clinical data. A comparison of results between two groups (mandatory surgical exploration versus selective surgical exploration) was made to check the safety of selective management in terms of the rates of morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis at the Emergency Department of the Hospital das Clínicas of the University of Sao Paulo was performed by a chart review of our trauma registry, identifying 161 penetrating neck trauma victims.

RESULTS

Of the 161 patients, 81.6 % were stabbed and 18.4 % had gunshot injuries. Stratifying the wound entry points by neck zones, we observed that zone I was penetrated in 32.8 %, zone II in 44.1 % and zone III in 23.1 % of all the cases. Thirty one patients (19.2 %) had immediate surgical exploration, which had a mean length of stay of 6 days, a complication rate of 12.9 % and a mortality rate of 9.4 %. Of the 130 who underwent selective surgical exploration 34 (26.1 %) required operative procedures after careful physical examination and diagnostic testing based on clinical indications. The mean length of stay for the selective surgical exploration group was 2 days with a complication rate of 17.6 % with no mortality, and virtually all of them were related to associated injuries in distant body segment. No statistical significance was found comparing mortality and complication rates between the two groups. Selective approach avoided 59 % of unnecessary exploratory cervicotomies.

CONCLUSION

Careful evaluation of asymptomatic and stable patients with minor signs of injury can safely avoid unnecessary neck explorations with low rates of morbidity. This should be the standard management of such patients.

An audit of penetrating neck injuries in a South African trauma service

INTRODUCTION

This study reviews and validates the practice of selective non-operative management (SNOM) of penetrating neck injury (PNI) in a South African trauma service and reviews the impact new imaging modalities have had on the management of this injury.

METHODOLOGY

This study was performed within the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service, in the city of Pietermaritzburg, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. A prospectively maintained trauma registry was retrospectively interrogated. All patients with PNI treated over a 46-month period were included within the study.

RESULTS

A total of 510 patients were included in the study. There were 452 stab wounds (SW) and 58 gunshot wounds (GSW). A total of 202 (40%) patients sustained isolated PNI, the remaining 308 (60%) patients sustained trauma to at least one additional anatomical region. An airway injury was identified in 29 (6%) patients; a pharyngo-oesophageal injury in 41 (8%) patients and a vascular injury in 86 (17%) patients. Associated injuries included three penetrating cardiac injuries (PCI) and 146 patients with haemo-pneumothoraces. Of the total cohort, 387 patients (76%) underwent CT Angiography (CTA), of which 70 (18%) demonstrated a vascular injury. Formal catheter directed angiogram (CDA) was performed on 16 patients with positive CTA but confirmed injury in only half of these patients. Of 212 patients (42%) who underwent water-soluble contrast swallow (WS-swallow), an injury was demonstrated in 29 (14%) cases. A total of 401 (79%) patients were successfully managed conservatively for PNI and 109 (21%) surgically or by endovascular intervention. Only five (1.2%) patients failed a trial of SNOM and required surgery. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2%. No deaths could be attributed to a failure of SNOM.

CONCLUSION

SNOM of PNI is a safe and appropriate management strategy. The conservative management of isolated pharyngeal injuries is well supported by our findings but the role of conservative treatment of oesophageal injuries needs to be further defined. The SNOM of small non-destructive upper airway injuries seems to be a safe strategy, while destructive airway injuries require formal repair. Imaging merely for proximity, is associated with a low yield. CTA has a significant false positive rate and good clinical assessment remains the cornerstone of management.