Mechanism of injury alone is not justified as the sole indication for computed tomographic imaging in blunt pediatric trauma

The paediatric polytrauma CT-indication (PePCI)-score-Development of a prognostic model to reduce unnecessary CT scans in paediatric trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Whole-Body CT (WBCT) is frequently used in emergency situations for promptly diagnosing paediatric polytrauma patients, given the challenges associated with obtaining precise details about the mechanism and progression of trauma. However, WBCT does not lead to reduced mortality in paediatric patients, but is associated with high radiation exposure. We therefore wanted to develop a screening tool for CT demand-driven emergency room (ER)-trauma diagnostic to reduce radiation exposure in paediatric patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study in a Level I trauma centre in Germany was performed. Data from 344 paediatric emergency patients with critical mechanism of injury who were pre-announced by the ambulance for the trauma room were collected. Patients' symptoms, clinical examination, extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (eFAST), routinely, laboratory tests and blood gas and - when obtained - WBCT images were analysed. To identify potential predictors of severe injuries (ISS > 23), 300 of the 344 cases with complete data were subjected to regression analyses model.

RESULTS

Multiple regression analysis identified cGCS, base excess (BE), medically abnormal results from eFAST screening, initial unconsciousness, and injuries involving three or more body regions as significant predictors for a screening tool for decision-making to perform WBCT or selective CT. The developed Paediatric polytrauma CT-Indication (PePCI)-Score was divided into three risk categories and achieved a sensitivity of 87 % and a specificity of 71 % when comparing the low and medium risk groups with the high risk group. Comparing only the low-risk group with the high-risk group for the decision to perform WBCT, 32/35 (91 %) of patients with an ISS >23 were correctly identified, as were 124/137 (91 %) with lower ISS scores.

CONCLUSION

With the newly developed PePCI-Score, the frequency of WBCT in a paediatric emergency patients collective can be significantly reduced according to our data. After prospective validation, the initial assessment of paediatric trauma patients in the future could be made not only by the mechanism of injury, but also by the new PePCI-Score, deriving on clinical findings after thorough clinical assessment and the discretion of the trauma team.

Disparities in computed tomography utilization for pediatric blunt trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pediatric and non-pediatric trauma centers

Pediatric blunt trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and computed tomography (CT) imaging is vital for accurate evaluation and management. Pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) have selective CT practices, while non-PTCs may differ, resulting in potential variations in CT utilization. The objective of this study is to delineate disparities in CT utilization for pediatric blunt trauma patients between PTCs and non-PTCs. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following established guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 3, 2023. All studies examining CT utilization in the management of pediatric (aged < 21 years) blunt trauma and specifying the type of trauma center(s) were included, and data were extracted and analyzed using STATA software version 17.0. An analysis of 30 studies revealed significant variations in CT scan utilization among pediatric blunt trauma patients across different types of trauma centers. PTCs exhibited lower pooled rates of abdominopelvic CT scans (35.4% vs. 44.9%, p < 0.01), cranial CT scans (36.9% vs. 42.9%, p < 0.01), chest CT scans (14.5% vs. 25.4%, p < 0.01), and cervical spine CT scans (23% vs. 45%, p < 0.01) compared to adult or mixed trauma centers (ATCs/MTCs). PTCs had a pooled rate of 54% for receiving at least one CT scan, while ATCs/MTCs had a higher rate of 69.3% (p < 0.05). The studies demonstrated considerable heterogeneity. These findings underscore the need to conduct further research to understand the reasons for the observed variations and to promote appropriate imaging usage, minimize radiation exposure, and encourage collaboration between pediatric and adult trauma centers.

Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Tomography and Whole-Body Computed Tomography in Pediatric Polytrauma Diagnostics-A Retrospective Long-Term Two-Center Study

Although serious accidents remain the leading cause of pediatric mortality, protocols to orient diagnostic procedures towards a certain type of initial imaging are widely needed. Since 2007, we have performed whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMR) and whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for diagnoses of severely injured children. We retrospectively reviewed 134 WBMR and 158 WBCT in patients younger than 16 years that were performed at two trauma centers between 2007 and 2018. A higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) was found in WBCT vs. WBMR (10.6 vs. 5.8; p = 0.001), but without any significant difference in mortality. The WBMR was significantly preferred at younger ages (9.6 vs. 12.8 years; p < 0.001). The time between patient's arrival until diagnosis was 2.5 times longer for WBCT (92.1 vs. 37.1 min; p < 0.001). More patients in the CT group received analgesic sedation and/or intubation at 37.3% vs. 21.6% in the MRI group. Of these patients, 86.4% (CT) and 27.6% (MRI) were already preclinically sedated (p < 0.001). Correspondingly, 72.4% of the patients were first sedated in-hospital for MRIs. In conclusion, WBMR is an alternative and radiation-free imaging method for high-energy-traumatized children. Although the selected diagnostics seemed appropriate, limitations regarding longer duration or additional analgesic sedation are present, and further studies are needed.

Radiologic Imaging Does Not Add Value for Female Pediatric Patients with Isolated Blunt Straddle Mechanisms

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to characterize the utility of radiologic imaging and examination under anesthesia in female pediatric patients with isolated blunt straddle injuries.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Single health care system with a children's hospital and level 1 pediatric trauma center.

PARTICIPANTS

Female patients aged 1-17 years with blunt straddle injuries from 2006 to 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiologic imaging performed, number of patients requiring exam under anesthesia (EUA), number of injuries not identified in patients who did not undergo EUA.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 83 patients. Of these, 11 (13%) had imaging performed. Thirty-four patients were managed as outpatients, 28 were discharged from the emergency department without need for intervention, and 49 patients were admitted. Of these, 48 (98%) went to the operating room for exam EUA. No occult injuries were identified on radiologic studies. Imaging was not associated with need for EUA. No missed injuries occurred in children who were not imaged. Two patients who were imaged returned for EUA following evolution of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Radiologic imaging did not add diagnostic value for female pediatric patients with blunt straddle injuries. These data emphasize the importance of EUA with repair and advocates for minimization of radiologic imaging in this patient group.

Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources is a common problem, constituting 10-34% of health services spending in the western world. Even though diagnostic imaging is vital for identifying correct diagnoses and administrating the right treatment, low-value imaging-in which the diagnostic test confers little to no clinical benefit-is common and contributes to inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources. There is a lack of knowledge on the types and extent of low-value imaging. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize, and quantify the extent of low-value diagnostic imaging examinations for adults and children.

METHODS

A scoping review of the published literature was performed. Medline-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 2010 to September 2020. The search strategy was built from medical subject headings (Mesh) for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology OR Health service misuse/Medical overuse OR Procedures and Techniques Utilization/Facilities and Services Utilization. Articles in English, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, or Norwegian were included.

RESULTS

A total of 39,986 records were identified and, of these, 370 studies were included in the final synthesis. Eighty-four low-value imaging examinations were identified. Imaging of atraumatic pain, routine imaging in minor head injury, trauma, thrombosis, urolithiasis, after thoracic interventions, fracture follow-up and cancer staging/follow-up were the most frequently identified low-value imaging examinations. The proportion of low-value imaging varied between 2 and 100% inappropriate or unnecessary examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive list of identified low-value radiological examinations for both adults and children are presented. Future research should focus on reasons for low-value imaging utilization and interventions to reduce the use of low-value imaging internationally.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42020208072.

Clinicoradiological Predictors of Severity of Traumatic Intra-Abdominal Injury in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background

Adequate assessment of traumatic injury in patients of all age groups is essential for timely intervention and prevention of mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to assess the value of certain clinical as well as radiological factors as predictors of severity of the intra-abdominal injury as detected on computed tomography (CT) and to review the guidelines, protocols, and practices followed in imaging of abdominal trauma in patients of pediatric age group.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 263 pediatric patients (18 years of age or younger) who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a history of trauma to the abdomen. The study was conducted over a period of 12 months. Correlation of five variables, i.e., age of the child, focused abdominal sonography in trauma (FAST) status, mechanism of injury, presenting complaints and clinical features (hypotension, tachycardia, etc), fractures identified on trauma X-ray series, was done with CT findings (severity of injury). All five variables were statistically analyzed and p-values were derived for age, mechanism of injury, presenting complaints, clinical features, and trauma x-ray series, while parameters like sensitivity and specificity were determined for FAST status

Results

All variables well correlated with the severity of injury with p-values <0.05. On multivariate analysis, FAST status had the highest (47.94) odds ratio among the five variables for predicting severe intra-abdominal injury while vital signs had the lowest (0.076). Further, age group of 0-4 years was found most prone to higher grades of injury with odds ratio of 7.83. Motor vehicle crash had odds ratio of 26.6 for severe injury, the highest among mechanisms of injury. While for FAST status, sensitivity was found to be 89.4%, specificity 85%, and negative predictive value 90%, trauma series radiographs had a sensitivity of 42.27%, specificity of 77.85% and negative predictive value of 60.55%.

Conclusion

Clinical parameters and traditional imaging techniques can predict the severity of injury on CT and guide further imaging and intervention.

Chest x-ray vs. computed tomography of the chest in pediatric blunt trauma

INTRODUCTION

Chest x-ray (CXR) has been shown to be an effective detection tool for clinically significant trauma. We evaluated differences in findings between CXR and computed tomography of the chest (CCT), their impact on clinical management and the performance of the CXR.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined children (less than 18 years) who received a CXR and CCT between 2009 and 2015. We compared characteristics of children by conducting univariate analysis, reporting the proportion of additional diagnoses captured by CCT, and using it to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the CXR. Outcome variables were diagnoses made by CCT as well as the ensuing changes in the clinical management attributable to the diagnoses reported by the CCT and not observed by the CXR.

RESULTS

In 1235 children, CCT was associated with diagnosing higher proportions of contusion or atelectasis (60% vs 31%; p < .0001), pneumothorax (23% vs 9%; p < .0001), rib fracture (18% vs 7%; p < .0001), other fracture (20% vs 10%; p < .0001), diaphragm rupture (0.2% vs 0.1%; p = .002), and incidental findings (7% vs 2%; p < .0001) as compared to CXR. CCT findings changed the management of 107 children (8.7%) with 32 (2.6%) of the changes being surgical procedures. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the CXR were 57.9% (95% CI: 54.5-61.2) and 90.2% (95% CI: 86.8-93.1), respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 93.1% and 48.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CXR is a useful initial screening tool to evaluate pediatric trauma patients along with clinical presentation in the Emergency Department in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic test.

Error traps and culture of safety in pediatric trauma

Trauma is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population. Due to a variety of factors, many pediatric trauma patients are initially evaluated and stabilized at adult hospitals that lack pediatric specific emergency medicine and surgical expertise. While similar to adult patients, the initial evaluation and resuscitation of pediatric patients does differ. Many of these key differences contribute to missed injury and susceptibility to error in the treatment of children. Here, we highlight a variety of differences between pediatric and adult trauma patients and clarify reasoning for these differences. Error traps that are discussed include missed cases of non-accidental trauma, missed blunt cerebrovascular injury, over use of CT (computed tomography) scans with unnecessary radiation exposure, missed small bowel or mesenteric injury, and unrecognized hemodynamic instability.

Does the incidence of thoracic aortic injury warrant the routine use of chest computed tomography in children?

BACKGROUND

Thoracic aortic injury is a potentially life-threatening injury associated with rapid deceleration mechanisms. Diagnosis is made by chest computed tomography (CT), which is associated with a risk of radiation-induced malignancy. We sought to determine the incidence of aortic injuries in the pediatric population to weigh against the risk of CT imaging.

METHODS

The Pediatric Health Information Systems was queried for children ≤18 years with discharge diagnosis code of thoracic aortic injury (901.0) between December 2004 and 2014. Data abstracted included patient age, gender, diagnosis and procedure codes, and discharge disposition, where available. We also queried for imaging codes to determine what type of chest imaging the child received.

RESULTS

Between December 2004 and 2014, 311,850 children were admitted to Pediatric Health Information Systems hospitals with traumatic injury. Of these patients, 46 (0.015%) were coded with a thoracic aortic injury and an accompanying E-code. Twenty-seven patients (58.7%) were male, and the median age was 13 years. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (63%, n = 29). Eighteen hospitals (41.9%) had no patients with a thoracic aortic injury in the 10-year period. In children with a thoracic aortic injury, the mortality rate was 11% (n = 5) and 22 (47.8%) underwent a chest CT during their hospitalization. Forty percent (124,909) of all trauma patients underwent chest CT, with a positive rate for aortic injury of 1.8/10,000. The reported estimated cancer risk from a chest CT scan is 25/10,000 for girls and 7.5/10, 000 in boys, greater than the positive CT rate.

CONCLUSION

Thoracic aortic injuries are rare in children in the United States. The risk of cancer associated with screening chest CT is greater than the likelihood of identifying an aortic injury. Therefore, screening chest CT scans are unwarranted in injured children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management, level IV.

Indication of whole body computed tomography in pediatric polytrauma patients-Diagnostic potential of the Glasgow Coma Scale, the mechanism of injury and clinical examination

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic potential of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the mechanism of injury (MOI) and clinical examination (CE) for the indication of whole body computed tomography (WBCT) in pediatric polytrauma patients.

MATERIALS & METHODS

100 pediatric polytrauma patients with WBCT were analysed in terms of age, gender, (MOI), GCS, detected injury, FAST, CE and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Correlations between all clinical variables and patient groups with (p+) and without (p-) injury were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean age was 9.13 ± 4.4 years (28% female patients). Injury was detected in 71% of the patients, most commonly of the head (43%). There was no significant correlation between type or severity of MOI and ISS (p > 0.1). None of the clinical variables had a significant predictive effect on p+. The optimum discrimination threshold of GCS was at 12.5 relating to craniocerebral injuries. Severity of MOI and FAST showed best predictive effects on thoracic and abdominal pathologies, respectively, but with only low sensitivities (<20%).

CONCLUSION

There is no clinical variable, which can be used as sole indication for WBCT in pediatric polytrauma patients. GCS had a significant predictive value for craniocerbral injuries and CCT is recommended at GCS ≤ 13.

Do not waste your time: straight to magnetic resonance imaging for pediatric burners and stingers

BACKGROUND

Permanent neurologic injury in pediatric patients with burner and stinger syndrome (BSS) is unlikely. This study aims to assess the feasibility of clinical observation without extensive radiologic workup in this selective population.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of patients aged younger than 18 years evaluated at a level I trauma center from 2012 to 2014. Patients were grouped according to positive deficit (PD) or negative deficit (ND) upon physical examination. Demographics, clinical findings, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (ND, n = 14; PD, n = 16) were evaluated for BSS, most often as a result of injurious football tackle. Age and length of stay were similar between groups. Injury Severity Score was lower in the ND group than the PD group (1.6 ± 1.2 vs 3.8 ± 3.1, respectively; P< .05). Cervical computed tomography was performed on 11 patients (78.6%) in the ND group and 15 patients (93.8%) in the PD group at considerable added cost, with only 1 positive result in the ND group and none in the PD group. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed 2 positive findings in each group, and no surgical interventions were indicated. Ten ND (71.4%) and 12 PD (75%) patients reported complete resolution of symptoms at discharge (P> .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Children presenting with BSS experience temporary symptoms that resolve without surgical intervention. Magnetic resonance imaging identified more injuries than computed tomographic imaging; therefore, we suggest that management for BSS should include observation, serial neurologic examinations, and MRI evaluation as appropriate.

Elevated white blood cell count, decreased hematocrit and presence of macrohematuria correlate with abdominal organ injury in pediatric blunt trauma patients: a retrospective study

Introduction

Computerized tomography (CT) has become an important diagnostic modality in trauma patients. Pediatric patients are particularly susceptible to ionized radiation making liberal CT use in this age group unacceptable. We aimed to identify parameters that might predict abnormal findings on abdominal CT leading to patient management changes.

Methods

Data on blunt trauma patients up to 15 years of age admitted to Assaf Harofeh Medical Center from January 2007 to October 2014 was retrospectively collected. All patients with abdominal CT scan as part of initial assessment were included. Medical and surgical data were extracted from the medial charts. Patients were divided into two groups. Group I: patients whose management was changed solely based on abdominal CT findings and Group II: patients with normal abdominal CT. The groups were compared by all the data parameters.

Results

Overall, 182 patients were included in the study. The groups were comparable by age and mechanism of injury. Management changes based on CT findings were found in 68 (37.4 %) patients. White blood cell count >14000, abnormally low hematocrit level and macrohematuria were associated with a diagnosis of intra-abdominal injury requiring patient management changes (p < 0.05). Group I patients had longer LOS. Fifteen patients (22 %) required active intervention based solely on CT findings. Physical examination, arterial blood gases and initial radiology examinations results did not correlate with abdominal CT findings.

Conclusions

Elevated WBC, decreased hematocrit and presence of macrohematuria strongly correlate with abdominal CT findings and lead to changes in patient management.

Pediatric trauma care with computed tomography--criteria for CT scanning

Trauma centers, trauma management concepts, as well as integration of whole-body computed tomography (CT) reduced mortality significantly. The accuracy of a trauma care algorithm with emergency CT in children was evaluated. Data of 71 children with emergency CT were recorded retrospectively. In addition to epidemiological data admission date, kind of CT scan, mechanism of injury, missed diagnoses, injury severity score (ISS), admission to and time on intensive care unit (ICU), and time of hospitalization were observed. The algorithm for CT scanning was based on mechanism of injury, pattern of injury, and altered vital signs. Sixty-nine percent of the children reached the ER during on-call service hours. A percentage of 32.4 received a whole-body scan and 67.6 % a cranial scan. The mean ER ISS was 9.9 points (1-57). Children have different trauma mechanisms compared to adults. A percentage of 33.8 of the children had relevant trauma related findings in the CT scan. In 2 children, (2.8 %) 3 diagnoses (2.2 %) were initially missed. After reevaluation of the CT data, all diagnoses were identified. Thus, the accuracy of our algorithm in children was 100 %. In children, our algorithm detected all injuries, but only one third of the children had relevant trauma related findings in the CT scan. In order to reduce radiation exposure but preserve the advantages of CT, a new algorithm was developed with more flexibility taking the child's age and mental status more into account as well as clinical findings. The mechanism of injury itself is not anymore an indication for CT scanning.

Utility of complete trauma series radiographs in alert pediatric patients presenting to Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of trauma series radiographs in the management of alert pediatric patients with traumatic injury and to ascertain whether it is necessary to acquire the entire trauma series in these children.

METHODS

A total of 176 consecutive children below the age of 15 years and having Glasgow Coma Scale score greater than 12, who presented to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital with a history of recent trauma, were retrospectively reviewed. All the children had undergone a thorough clinical examination followed by complete trauma series radiographs, according to the American College of Surgery guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 558 radiographs were reviewed by a consultant pediatric radiologist including 528 trauma series radiographs and 30 additional radiographs. Among the trauma series radiographs, 35 (6.63 %) had evidence of injury; 24 (4.54 %) and 11 (2.08 %) involving the chest and pelvic regions, respectively. All children with normal physical examination had normal cervical spine and chest radiographs. Among the 11 positive pelvic X-rays, only two had radiological signs of injury in the absence of localizing physical signs, and all these children were less than 3 years of age. In all the remaining cases, children had localizing signs on physical examination. Out of the 30 additional X-rays, 27 (90 %) had radiological evidence of injury.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine use of entire radiological trauma series in alert pediatric patients with a normal physical examination has a very low yield. In these children, the localizing signs and symptoms can help us in determining the specific radiological examination to be utilized.