Clinicopathological characteristics and effect of late acute rejection on renal transplant outcomes

Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of thymoglobulin versus no induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients at low risk of graft loss

BACKGROUND

A new induction therapy strategy of a single 3 mg/kg dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) showed a lower incidence of acute rejection.

METHODS

The objective of this study was to use real-world data to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of r-ATG induction for the prevention of acute rejection (AR) in the first year following kidney transplantation and for kidney graft survival over 1, 4, and 10 years of post-transplantation from the perspective of the national public healthcare system. A Markov state transition model was developed utilizing real-world data extracted from medical invoices from a single center. The study population consisted of adults at low immunological risk undergoing their initial transplantation and received kidneys from either living or deceased donors. The intervention of r-ATG induction was compared to no induction. The clinical outcomes considered for this analysis were acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection/disease, death, graft loss, and retransplantation.

RESULTS

The cost-effectiveness analysis in the first year revealed that the r-ATG group was more cost-effective, with an ICER of US$ 399.96 per avoided AR episode, an effectiveness gain of 0.01 year in graft survival and a total incremental cost of US$ 147.50. The 4- and 10-year analyses revealed an effectiveness gain of 0.06 and 0.16 years in graft survival in the r-ATG induction group, and a total incremental cost of US$ -321.68 and US$ -2,440.62, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The single 3 mg/kg dose of r-ATG is cost-effective in preventing acute rejection episodes and dominant in the long term of transplantation, conferring survival gain.

Plasma cell-rich related acute rejection in kidney transplant: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

Plasma cell-rich acute rejection (PCAR), a subtype of T cell-mediated rejection, is a relatively rare type of acute allograft rejection, that is usually associated with a higher rate of graft failure. However, it is difficult to diagnose PCAR precisely.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 45-year-old woman who had received a kidney transplant presented with acute kidney injury and uremic symptoms approximately 1 year after transplantation.

DIAGNOSIS

A renal biopsy was performed and pathological examination revealed marked inflammation with abundant plasma cells in areas within interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. The patient was diagnosed with PCAR and chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (CA-TCMR) grade IA.

INTERVENTIONS

Immunosuppressants were administered as tacrolimus (2 mg twice daily), mycophenolate mofetil (250 mg twice daily), and prednisolone (15 mg/day) for suspected PCAR.

OUTCOMES

The patients showed rapid deterioration in kidney function and reached impending graft failure.

LESSONS

PCAR is often associated with poor graft outcome. The high variability in tacrolimus levels could contribute to poor patient outcomes, leaving aggressive immunosuppressive therapy as the remaining choice for PCAR treatment.

Clinical and Pathological Features of Plasma Cell-Rich Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Plasma cell-rich acute rejection (PCAR) is a rare type of allograft rejection characterized by the presence of mature plasma cells. In general, the prognosis of PCAR is poor, and its clinical and pathological features remain unclear.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study and compared allograft survival between kidney transplant recipients who developed PCAR and those who did not develop PCAR. We further analyzed clinical and pathological risk factors for allograft failure in PCAR patients.

RESULTS

Of 1956 recipients, 40 developed PCAR. There was a higher prevalence of deceased donor transplants (27.5% vs 11.7%, P = 0.0059), longer median total ischemia time (99 minutes; interquartile range, 71-144 vs 77 minutes; interquartile range, 59-111; P = 0.0309), and lower prevalence of ABO-incompatible transplantation (7.5% vs 22.5%; P = 0.0206) in patients with PCAR than in those without PCAR.Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that development of PCAR was associated with allograft loss (hazard ratio, 8.03; 95% confidence interval, 3.89-14.80; P < 0.0001).We classified PCAR according to the Banff 2015 criteria into a borderline change group, a T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) group, an antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) or suspected of having AMR (AMR/sAMR) group, and a mixed rejection (TCMR/AMR) group. The AMR/sAMR group was associated with a lower rate of allograft survival without significant difference (log-rank test, P = 0.1692).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that PCAR was an independent risk factor for allograft loss. PCAR presented with all types of rejection in the Banff 2015 criteria, and AMR/sAMR was associated with poor allograft survival.

Recurrent IgG4-related tubulointerstitial nephritis concurrent with chronic active antibody mediated rejection: A case report

IgG4-related disease is a relatively newly described entity that can affect nearly any organ, including the kidneys, where it usually manifests as tubulointerstitial nephritis (IgG4-TIN). The diagnosis can be suggested by characteristic histological features, including an inflammatory infiltrate with increased IgG4-positive plasma cells associated with "storiform" fibrosis. Serum IgG4 is usually elevated. In the native kidney and other organs, there is typically a brisk response to treatment with immunosuppression. Recurrence of IgG4-TIN after renal transplant has not been described in the literature. Here, we describe the first case of recurrent IgG4-TIN in a young patient concomitant with chronic active antibody mediated rejection five years after kidney transplant. Recurrent IgG4-TIN could be diagnosed by the characteristic histopathologic features and increased IgG4-positive plasma cells. Despite maintenance immunosuppression, this disease may recur in the kidney allograft.

Kidney allograft failure in the steroid-free immunosuppression era: A matched case-control study

We studied the causes and predictors of death-censored kidney allograft failure among 1670 kidney recipients transplanted at our center in the corticosteroid-free maintenance immunosuppression era. As of January 1, 2012, we identified 137 recipients with allograft failure; 130 of them (cases) were matched 1-1 for recipient age, calendar year of transplant, and donor type with 130 recipients with functioning grafts (controls). Median time to allograft failure was 29 months (interquartile range: 18-51). Physician-validated and biopsy-confirmed categories of allograft failure were as follows: acute rejection (21%), glomerular disease (19%), transplant glomerulopathy (13%), interstitial fibrosis tubular atrophy (10%), and polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (7%). Graft failures were attributed to medical conditions in 21% and remained unresolved in 9%. Donor race, donor age, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, serum creatinine, urinary protein, acute cellular rejection, acute antibody-mediated rejection, BK viremia, and CMV viremia were associated with allograft failure. Independent predictors of allograft failure were acute cellular rejection (odds ratio: 18.31, 95% confidence interval: 5.28-63.45) and urine protein ≥1 g/d within the first year post-transplantation (5.85, 2.37-14.45). Serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL within the first year post-transplantation reduced the odds (0.29, 0.13-0.64) of allograft failure. Our study has identified modifiable risk factors to reduce the burden of allograft failure.

The clinicopathological relevance of pretransplant anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies in renal transplantation

Background

Anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) have been suggested as a risk factor for graft failure and acute rejection (AR). However, the prevalence and clinical significance of pretransplant AT1R-Abs have seldom been evaluated in Asia.

Methods

In this multicenter, observational cohort study, we tested the AT1R-Abs in pretransplant serum samples obtained from 166 kidney transplant recipients. Statistical analysis was used to set a threshold AT1R-Abs level at 9.05 U/mL.

Results

Pretransplant AT1R-Abs were detected in 98/166 (59.0%) of the analyzed recipients. No graft loss or patient death was reported during the study period. AT1R-Abs (+) patients had a significantly higher incidence of biopsy-proven AR than AT1R-Abs (-) patients (27.6 versus 10.3%, P = 0.007). Recipients with pretransplant AT1R-Abs had a 3.2-fold higher risk of AR within a year of transplantation (P = 0.006). Five study subjects developed microcirculation inflammation (score ≥2). Four of them were presensitized to AT1R-Abs. In particular, three patients had a high titer of anti-AT1R-Abs (>22.7 U/mL).

Conclusions

Pretransplant AT1R-Abs is an independent risk factor for AR, especially acute cellular rejection, and is possibly associated with the risk of antibody-mediated injury. Pretransplant assessment of AT1R-Abs may be useful for stratifying immunologic risks.

Rejection of the Renal Allograft in the Absence of Demonstrable Antibody and Complement

BACKGROUND

Recent literature has stressed the prominent role of antibodies in graft loss. This study was designed to assess a growing perception that T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is no longer clinically relevant.

METHODS

Five hundred forty-five renal allograft recipients over a 3-year period were screened for biopsies with: (a) TCMR including borderline change (BL), (b) negative complement protein C4 degradation fragment, and (c) absence of donor-specific antibody at time of transplant, within 30 days of the biopsy, and up to 4 measurements at later time points.

RESULTS

These stringent requirements identified 28 "pure" cases of late TCMR/BL. Low-grade glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, or chronic transplant glomerulopathy were found in 9/28 (32%) biopsies. Serum creatinine showed complete short-term remission in 7/10 (70%) BL and 9/18 (50%) TCMR patients 1 month postbiopsy. Yet, both treated and untreated patients demonstrated further decline in graft function as assessed by serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Late TCMR seen in 7.9% of biopsies can contribute to significant deterioration of graft function in patients in whom the dominant contribution of antibody-mediated injury has been reasonably excluded. Our data also reinforce existing literature showing that microvascular lesions do not have absolute specificity for a diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection.

Infectious complications as the leading cause of death after kidney transplantation: analysis of more than 10,000 transplants from a single center

AIM

To identify specific causes of graft failure in a large sample of kidney transplant patients from a middle-income, developing country.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study analyzing all consecutive single kidney transplants (KTs) performed at a single center in Brazil between January 1st 1998 and December 31st 2013. The database closing date was December 31st 2014.

RESULTS

Out of 10,400 KTs, there were 1191 (11.45%) deaths with a functioning graft, 40 cases (0.38%) of primary non-function (PNF) and 1417 cases (13.62%) of graft loss excluding death and PNF as the cause. Infectious complications (404 cases, 34% of all deaths) were the major cause of death. Most deaths due to infection occurred within the first year after transplantation (157 deaths, 38.86%). Immunologic mechanisms, comprising acute rejection and immune-mediated interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), were responsible for 52% of all cases of graft failure not involving recipient death. Half of the losses by acute rejection occurred late after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to what is observed in developed countries, infectious complications are the main challenge with kidney transplantation in Brazil. Non-adherence to treatment also appears to contribute significantly to long-term kidney graft loss. Strategies for improvement should focus on better compliance and a greater safety profile of immunosuppressive treatment.

Gene Expression in Biopsies of Acute Rejection and Interstitial Fibrosis/Tubular Atrophy Reveals Highly Shared Mechanisms That Correlate With Worse Long-Term Outcomes

Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) is found in approximately 25% of 1-year biopsies posttransplant. It is known that IFTA correlates with decreased graft survival when histological evidence of inflammation is present. Identifying the mechanistic etiology of IFTA is important to understanding why long-term graft survival has not changed as expected despite improved immunosuppression and dramatically reduced rates of clinical acute rejection (AR) (Services UDoHaH. http://www.ustransplant.org/annual_reports/current/509a_ki.htm). Gene expression profiles of 234 graft biopsy samples were obtained with matching clinical and outcome data. Eighty-one IFTA biopsies were divided into subphenotypes by degree of histological inflammation: IFTA with AR, IFTA with inflammation, and IFTA without inflammation. Samples with AR (n = 54) and normally functioning transplants (TX; n = 99) were used in comparisons. A novel analysis using gene coexpression networks revealed that all IFTA phenotypes were strongly enriched for dysregulated gene pathways and these were shared with the biopsy profiles of AR, including IFTA samples without histological evidence of inflammation. Thus, by molecular profiling we demonstrate that most IFTA samples have ongoing immune-mediated injury or chronic rejection that is more sensitively detected by gene expression profiling. These molecular biopsy profiles correlated with future graft loss in IFTA samples without inflammation.

Four-Year Analyses of Renal Graft Biopsies: A Single-Center Pathology Experience

OBJECTIVES

Kidney transplant is the best treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Long-term graft survival depends on the protection of renal allograft function. Renal allograft biopsy is the most important method for examining an allograft function. Biopsy provides critical information, enabling diagnosis and grading of pathologic changes, prediction of response to therapy, and long-term graft prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent renal transplant from living and deceased donors at Baskent University Adana Teaching and Research Hospital between 2010 and 2014 and who had an indication for biopsy. Clinical characteristics and laboratory results of patients were recorded. Patient biopsy samples were examined according to the Banff 2009 classification.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2014, there were 175 renal transplants performed at our hospital, with 134 recipients (76.6%) having living-donor and 41 recipients (23.4%) having deceased-donor transplants. Fifty-one patients (29.1%) were children, and 124 patients (70.9%) were adults. We found that there were 123 biopsies made from 75 transplant patients over a 4-year period. When examined according to Banff 2009 criteria, the biopsy samples revealed acute T-cell-mediated rejection alone in 14.1% of the samples, acute antibody-mediated rejection in 4%, and a combination of the 2 rejections in 5.7%. Specific infections were detected in 12 patients. The graft nephrectomy rate was 5.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study investigated biopsy results, their relation with patient clinical status and 4-year survival rates, and our pathology experience and found that rejection and infection rates were similar to the literature. Our future studies with a longer follow-up and a larger sample size will likely provide more accurate information about graft survival and biopsy results.

T-cell-mediated rejection of the kidney in the era of donor-specific antibodies: diagnostic challenges and clinical significance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Burgeoning literature on antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) has led to a perception that T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is no longer a significant problem. This premise needs to be carefully appraised.

RECENT FINDINGS

A review of the literature indicates that TCMR remains an independent-risk factor for graft loss. Importantly, it can occur as a sensitizing event that triggers ABMR, and adversely affects its outcome. Moreover, T cells are regularly present in lesions used to diagnose ABMR, and these lesions can also develop in the absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Conversely, patients with DSA are at risk for mixed ABMR-TCMR, which is quite common in many studies, and may require a combined anti-T-cell and anti-B-cell strategy for the best outcome.

SUMMARY

T-cell-based clinical monitoring and therapy is still relevant for prophylaxis of both cellular and humoral rejection, treatment of steroid refractory TCMR, which occurs in up to 20% of patients, and optimization of clinical outcome in mixed TCMR-ABMR, which is more frequently encountered than generally appreciated, and still associated with unacceptably high rates of graft loss.