Determinants of C1q Binding in the Single Antigen Bead Assay

Complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch in solid organ transplantation: The gold standard or golden history?

Complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) has been considered for many years the standard of practice for determining compatibility in solid organ transplantation (SOT). However, as this method is laborious, time intensive and lacks sensitivity and specificity, it has been replaced in many laboratories worldwide by flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) and/or virtual crossmatch (vXM). With this study we intend to show the relevance of performing CDC-XM in the era of virtual crossmatching. We retrospectively analyzed 1,007 consecutive T and B cell deceased donor (DD) CDC-XMs performed in parallel using non-treated and dithiothreitol (DTT) treated sera between May 2022 and January 2023 in waitlisted patients with no donor specific antibodies (DSA) against HLA-A, B and/or DR antigens. Thirty five of 1,007 (3.5%) T cell crossmatches and 132 of 1,007 (13.1%) B cell crossmatches were positive with non-treated sera. Correlation with the vXM demonstrated no DSA in any of the positive T cell crossmatches. DSA were also absent in 126/132 positive B cell crossmatches, indicating a high rate of false positive CDC-XM. Indeed, only 4/35 T cell and 13/132 B cell CDC-XM remained positive after treatment with DTT, confirming that false positive reactivity with non-treated sera is high. Class I HLA DSA against C locus antigens were present in 17/1,007 T cell crossmatches and none were detected by CDC-XM (sensitivity = 0%). Similarly, only 6/77 B cell crossmatches with DSA targeting HLA-C, DQ and/or DP antigens were CDC-XM positive (sensitivity = 7.8%). Furthermore, only 4/6 positive B cell CDC-XM were confirmed to have complement binding potential using the C1q assay, suggesting additional false positive reactivity in 2/6 of the positive CDC-XM. Our study demonstrates that CDC-XM exhibits poor sensitivity, high false positive reactivity (especially without DTT treatment) and does not meaningfully contribute to pre-transplant compatibility testing in the context of vXM based allocation. Furthermore, the use of CDC-XM can unnecessarily delay or even prevent safe and appropriate transplant allocation.

Comparison of HLA antibody identification methods for the selection of platelet products for HLA-mediated platelet refractory patients

In an ineffective transfusion context, solid-phase immunoassays using the Luminex platform for the detection and characterization of HLA antibodies are currently used to select HLA-compatible platelet products. A new HLA antibody identification method, the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB test (BAG Health care GmbH, Lich, Germany), based on the detection of antibodies directed against a recombinant single antigen (SA) by colored spots detected by HISTO MATCH HLA AB module software, runs fully automated on the MR.SPOT®. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the HISTO SPOT HLA AB and C1qScreen™ (C1q SAB) assays with that of the Labscreen single antigen class I (OL SAB) assay to detect anti-HLA class I antibodies in 56 serum samples from 54 platelet refractory acute myeloid leukemia patients who received HLA mismatch platelet concentrates at a single oncohematology center. In total, 1414 class I specificities, 433 HLA-A and 981 HLA-B, were detected by the OL SAB test. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was >5000 for 874 antigens and <5000 for 655 antigens. The HISTO SPOT® HLA AB and C1q SAB tests identified 85% and 79% of OL SA-detected antigens with an MFI >5000, respectively, but did not identify 34% and 44% of OL SAB-detected antigens, highlighting the lower sensitivity of these techniques. Interestingly, the donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) identified by the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB and C1q SAB assays reacted against HLA mismatch platelet concentrates with the same specificity (86%) and positive predictive (77%) value as in the OL SAB test when the MFI threshold was >2000 for DSA detection. Although the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB test is less sensitive than the OL SAB test, this test could be used for the selection of HLA-compatible platelet products.

Complement-activating donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical appraisal

Introduction

Several studies have investigated the impact of circulating complement-activating anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (anti-HLA DSAs) on organ transplant outcomes. However, a critical appraisal of these studies and a demonstration of the prognostic value of complement-activating status over anti-HLA DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) level are lacking.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal evaluating the role of complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs on allograft outcomes in different solid organ transplants. We included studies through Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase since inception of databases till May 05, 2023. We evaluated allograft loss as the primary outcome, and allograft rejection as the secondary outcome. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and funnel plots to assess risk of bias and used bias adjustment methods when appropriate. We performed multiple subgroup analyses to account for sources of heterogeneity and studied the added value of complement assays over anti-HLA DSA MFI level.

Results

In total, 52 studies were included in the final meta-analysis (11,035 patients). Complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs were associated with an increased risk of allograft loss (HR 2.77; 95% CI 2.33-3.29, p<0.001; I²=46.2%), and allograft rejection (HR 4.98; 95% CI 2.96-8.36, p<0.01; I²=70.9%). These results remained significant after adjustment for potential sources of bias and across multiple subgroup analyses. After adjusting on pan-IgG anti-HLA DSA defined by the MFI levels, complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs were significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of allograft loss.

Discussion

We demonstrated in this systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal the significant deleterious impact and the independent prognostic value of circulating complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs on solid organ transplant risk of allograft loss and rejection.

HLA antibody affinity determination: From HLA-specific monoclonal antibodies to donor HLA specific antibodies (DSA) in patient serum

Organs transplanted across donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) are associated with a variety of clinical outcomes, including a high risk of acute kidney graft rejection. Unfortunately, the currently available assays to determine DSA characteristics are insufficient to clearly discriminate between potentially harmless and harmful DSA. To further explore the hazard potential of DSA, their concentration and binding strength to their natural target, using soluble HLA, may be informative. There are currently a number of biophysical technologies available that allow the assessment of antibody binding strength. However, these methods require prior knowledge of antibody concentrations. Our objective within this study was to develop a novel approach that combines the determination of DSA-affinity as well as DSA-concentration for patient sample evaluation within one assay. We initially tested the reproducibility of previously reported affinities of human HLA-specific monoclonal antibodies and assessed the technology-specific precision of the obtained results on multiple platforms, including surface plasmon resonance (SPR), bio-layer interferometry (BLI), Luminex (single antigen beads; SAB), and flow-induced dispersion analysis (FIDA). While the first three (solid-phase) technologies revealed comparable high binding-strengths, suggesting measurement of avidity, the latter (in-solution) approach revealed slightly lower binding-strengths, presumably indicating measurement of affinity. We believe that our newly developed in-solution FIDA-assay is particularly suitable to provide useful clinical information by not just measuring DSA-affinities in patient serum samples but simultaneously delivering a particular DSA-concentration. Here, we investigated DSA from 20 pre-transplant patients, all of whom showed negative CDC-crossmatch results with donor cells and SAB signals ranging between 571 and 14899 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). DSA-concentrations were found in the range between 11.2 and 1223 nM (median 81.1 nM), and their measured affinities fall between 0.055 and 24.7 nM (median 5.34 nM; 449-fold difference). In 13 of 20 sera (65%), DSA accounted for more than 0.1% of total serum antibodies, and 4/20 sera (20%) revealed a proportion of DSA even higher than 1%. To conclude, this study strengthens the presumption that pre-transplant patient DSA consists of various concentrations and different net affinities. Validation of these results in a larger patient cohort with clinical outcomes will be essential in a further step to assess the clinical relevance of DSA-concentration and DSA-affinity.

The impact of HLA donor-specific antibodies on engraftment and the evolving desensitization strategies

The majority of contemporary allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) procedures utilize partially HLA-mismatched stem cell grafts. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are associated with primary graft failure independent of the graft source, conditioning intensity and other patient and donor factors. Here we provide an update on testing and monitoring of DSA, review the impact of DSA on stem cell engraftment, and present promising desensitization modalities. Ultimately, we attempt to provide practical recommendations for DSA screening and mitigation strategies.

Determination of unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches in kidney transplant recipients

With the introduction of the virtual allocation crossmatch in the Eurotransplant (ET) region in 2023, the determination of unacceptable antigen mismatches (UAM) in kidney transplant recipients is of utmost importance for histocompatibility laboratories and transplant centers. Therefore, a joined working group of members from the German Society for Immunogenetics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Immungenetik, DGI) and the German Transplantation Society (Deutsche Transplantationsgesellschaft, DTG) revised and updated the previous recommendations from 2015 in light of recently published evidence. Like in the previous version, a wide range of topics is covered from technical issues to clinical risk factors. This review summarizes the evidence about the prognostic value of contemporary methods for HLA antibody detection and identification, as well as the impact of UAM on waiting time, on which these recommendations are based. As no clear criteria could be determined to differentiate potentially harmful from harmless HLA antibodies, the general recommendation is to assign all HLA against which plausible antibodies are found as UAM. There is, however, a need for individualized solutions for highly immunized patients. These revised recommendations provide a list of aspects that need to be considered when assigning UAM to enable a fair and comprehensible procedure and to harmonize risk stratification prior to kidney transplantation between transplant centers. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Increased Levels of sCD30 Have No Impact on the Incidence of Early ABMR and Long-Term Outcome in Intermediate-Risk Renal Transplant Patients With Preformed DSA

Background: It is still incompletely understood why some patients with preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) have reduced kidney allograft survival secondary to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), whereas many DSA-positive patients have favorable long-term outcomes. Elevated levels of soluble CD30 (sCD30) have emerged as a promising biomarker indicating deleterious T-cell help in conjunction with DSA in immunologically high-risk patients. We hypothesized that this would also be true in intermediate-risk patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed pre-transplant sera from 287 CDC-crossmatch negative patients treated with basiliximab induction and tacrolimus-based maintenance therapy for the presence of DSA and sCD30. The incidence of ABMR according to the Banff 2019 classification and death-censored allograft survival were determined.

Results: During a median follow-up of 7.4 years, allograft survival was significantly lower in DSA-positive as compared to DSA-negative patients (p < 0.001). In DSA-positive patients, most pronounced in those with strong DSA (MFI > 5,000), increased levels of sCD30 were associated with accelerated graft loss compared to patients with low sCD30 (3-year allograft survival 75 vs. 95%). Long-term survival, however, was comparable in DSA-positive patients irrespective of sCD30 status. Likewise, the incidence of early ABMR and lesion score characteristics were comparable between sCD30-positive and sCD30-negative patients with DSA. Finally, increased sCD30 levels were not predictive for early persistence of DSA.

Conclusion: Preformed DSA are associated with an increased risk for ABMR and long-term graft loss independent of sCD30 levels in intermediate-risk kidney transplant patients.

Approaches for the characterization of clinically relevant pre-transplant human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in solid organ transplant patients

The avoidance of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) attributed to human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibody incompatibility remains an essential function of clinical Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (H&I) laboratories who are supporting solid organ transplantation. Developments in HLA antibody identification assays over the past thirty years have greatly reduced unexpected positive cellular crossmatches and improved solid organ transplant outcomes. For sensitized patients, the decision to register unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches is often heavily influenced by results from solid phase antibody assays, particularly the Luminex^® Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assays, although the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by these assays remains unclear. As such, the identification of non-clinically relevant antibodies may proportionally increase the number of unacceptable transplant mismatches registered, with an associated increase in waiting time for a compatible organ. We reflect on the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by the Luminex SAB^® assays and consider whether the application of additional assays and/or tools could further develop our ability to define the clinical relevance of antibodies identified in patient sera. Improvements in this area would assist equity of access to a compatible transplant for highly sensitized patients awaiting a solid organ transplant.

The impact of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies in salvage haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide in patients with nonmalignant disorders

The presence of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) has been recognized as a major risk factor for graft failure (GF) after haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (haplo-PTCy). However, the role of DSAs in salvage haplo-PTCy for rescuing patients with nonmalignant disorders (NMDs) has not yet been reported. The present study retrospectively analyzed 22 patients with NMDs who underwent salvage haplo-PTCy from January 2008 to December 2017. The median age at the time of the rescue haplo-PTCy was 9 years (range, 1-26 years). Median time from the first transplant to second haplo-PTCy was 56 days (range, 37-591 days). Among all patients, six (27.3%) had DSAs, with a median DSA strength (mean fluorescence intensity [MFI]) of 5201 (range, 1412-11,543) in the first DSA testing. In addition, the median DSA MFI was 2672 (range, 832-10,498) before the bone marrow infusion. Overall, GF occurred in 5 (25%) of the 20 assessable patients. Three of four (75%) patients with DSAs experienced GF versus 2 of 16 (12.5%) DSA-negative patients (P = 0.032). The median DSA MFI for patients with GF was 6437 (range, 1412-10,498) versus 1845 (range, 832-2672) for those who engrafted or had early death (P = 0.030). One-year event-free survival was significantly lower in DSA-positive patients than in those without DSAs (16.7% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.002). DSA-negative patients had an acceptable 1-year survival of 62.5%. In conclusion, this study suggests that DSAs may be associated with deleterious outcomes after salvage haplo-PTCy in patients with NMDs.

Does a Useful Test Exist to Properly Evaluate the Pathogenicity of Donor-specific Antibodies? Lessons From a Comprehensive Analysis in a Well-studied Single-center Kidney Transplant Cohort

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) play a major role in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft dysfunction. However, the clinical relevance of complement-binding anti-HLA antibodies remains unclear.

METHODS

Here, we analyzed DSA detected in the serum (sDSA) using single antigen bead, C1q, and C3d assays combined with the study of intragraft DSA (gDSA) in 86 patients who had DSA and underwent a kidney biopsy for cause (n = 58) or without evidence of kidney dysfunction (n = 28). DSA characteristics were collected and related to the presence of AMR, graft histological features, and allograft survival.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (52%) had C1q DSA, and 42 (51%) had C3d DSA. Allograft biopsies revealed AMR in 63 cases (73%), regardless of kidney function. gDSA were identified in 74% of biopsies. We observed a strong correlation among single antigen bead mean fluorescence intensity and complement assays positivity, presence of gDSA, and AMR occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Complement-binding DSA per se were not significantly associated with allograft survival in the entire study sample. Finally, gDSA predicted subsequent graft loss in patients who showed a stable renal function at the day of biopsy. Our data suggest that DSA mean fluorescence intensity and presence of gDSA might provide prognostic information during posttransplant monitoring.

C3d-positive donor-specific antibodies have a role in pretransplant risk stratification of cross-match-positive HLA-incompatible renal transplantation: United Kingdom multicentre study

Anti-HLA-antibody characteristics aid to risk-stratify patients and improve long-term renal graft outcomes. Complement activation by donor-specific antibody (DSA) is an important characteristic that may determine renal allograft outcome. There is heterogeneity in graft outcomes within the moderate to high immunological risk cases (cross-match-positive). We explored the role of C3d-positive DSAs in sub-stratification of cross-match-positive cases and relate to the graft outcomes. We investigated 139 cross-match-positive living-donor renal transplant recipients from four transplant centres in the United Kingdom. C3d assay was performed on serum samples obtained at pretreatment (predesensitization) and Day 14 post-transplant. C3d-positive DSAs were found in 52 (37%) patients at pretreatment and in 37 (27%) patients at Day 14 post-transplant. Median follow-up of patients was 48 months (IQR 20.47-77.57). In the multivariable analysis, pretreatment C3d-positive DSA was independently associated with reduced overall graft survival, the hazard ratio of 3.29 (95% CI 1.37-7.86). The relative risk of death-censored five-year graft failure was 2.83 (95% CI 1.56-5.13). Patients with both pretreatment and Day 14 C3d-positive DSAs had the worst five-year graft survival at 45.5% compared with 87.2% in both pretreatment and Day 14 C3d-negative DSA patients with the relative risk of death-censored five-year graft failure was 4.26 (95% CI 1.79, 10.09). In this multicentre study, we have demonstrated for the first time the utility of C3d analysis as a distinctive biomarker to sub-stratify the risk of poor graft outcome in cross-match-positive living-donor renal transplantation.

Flow cytometry crossmatching to investigate kidney-biopsy-proven, antibody-mediated rejection in patients who develop de novo donor-specific antibodies

INTRODUCTION

The appearance of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (dnDSAs) after kidney transplantation is independently associated with poor long-term allograft outcomes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the predictive value of a flow cytometry crossmatching (FC-XM) assay after the appearance of dnDSAs related to antibody-mediated allograft rejection (ABMR) after kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 89 recipients with dnDSAs after transplantation were included. The crossmatching results were compared with the dnDSA profile (the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), the complement-binding activity, and the IgG subclass profile) and the biopsy's morphological features.

RESULTS

Of the 89 patients, 59 (66%) were positive in an FC-XM assay, 17 (19%) had complement-binding DSAs, 55 (62%) were positive for IgG1 and/or IgG3 in a solid phase assay, and 45 (51%) had morphological biopsy features linked to ABMR.

CONCLUSION

An FC-XM assay was unable to discriminate between cases with or without ABMR on biopsy findings; it had a low positive predictive value (<70%) and a low negative positive predictive value (<42.9%), taking into account the sensitivity of our assay (limit of detection: DSAs with an MFI >3000). In this context, the height of the MFI of the dnDSAs might be enough for a high positive predictive value for ABMR and additional testing for complement binding activity can remain optional.

Impact of pretransplant antibodies on outcomes after heart transplantation

Purpose of review

Since the discovery of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) in the 1950s, there has been great interest in the role of antibodies in posttransplant rejection. The development of the lymphocyte toxicity test by Terasaki et al. in the 1960s was the first step toward understanding the role of antibodies in posttransplant rejection.

Recent findings

Subsequently, various organs have been transplanted and improving posttransplant outcomes have become a focus of research. In particular, methods to measure antibodies that affect posttransplant outcomes, including anti-HLA antibodies, and methods to desensitize patients from specific antibodies have been explored. One recent method for measuring antibodies is called the solid-phase assay, which uses purified HLA fixed to microbeads. This assay does not use donor lymphocytes and allows clinicians to test the reactivity of patient serum against a panel of antibodies. It has also enabled the identification of specific anti-HLA antibodies using a single HLA.

Summary

In addition to advances in methods to measure and analyze anti-HLA antibodies, the clinical impact of non-HLA antibodies has also received much attention recently.

The meaning of donor-specific antibodies after heart transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major contributor of impaired long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTx). The presence of circulating donor-specific antihuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) is considered as a mandatory criterion for AMR after HTx. DSA are known prognostic biomarkers of outcome, for example, recipients with de-novo DSA have a three-fold increased risk of mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the awareness of the impact and prognosis of DSA on the survival has been increased in the HTx community over the last decade, the management of DSA pre and posttransplant varies among centers and is mainly based on the experience of transplant physicians. Thus, firm consensus strategies for each HTx recipient should be established by a center advisory board of experts in the field of HLA genetics, transplantation immunology, and HTx to evaluate the immunological risk preoperatively and also continuously during the posttransplant course. Consequently, the recent advances of invasive and noninvasive diagnostic tools should be applied, according to the risk, laboratory findings, and clinical events of the recipient. Such individual strategy will result in tailored therapeutic options.

SUMMARY

Novel standards for the management of DSA in HTx recipients on the basis of an interdisciplinary approach of experts will improve diagnostics for personalized medicine.

Biomarkers of rejection in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update of the literature on the use of new biomarkers of rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The kidney allograft biopsy is currently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of rejection. However, the kidney biopsy is invasive and could be indeterminate. A significant progress has been made in discovery of new biomarkers of rejection, and some of them have been introduced recently for potential use in clinical practice including measurement of serum donor-derived cell free DNA, allo-specific CD154 + T-cytotoxic memory cells, and gene-expression 'signatures'. The literature supports that these biomarkers provide fair and reliable diagnostic accuracy and may be helpful in clinical decision-making when the kidney biopsy is contraindicated or is inconclusive.

SUMMARY

The new biomarkers provide a promising approach to detect acute rejections in a noninvasive way.

Impact, Screening, and Therapy of HLA Antibodies in Patients before and after Lung Transplantation

Since almost 30 years, lung transplantation is a considerable therapeutic option in patients suffering from end-stage lung disease. Up to now, the impact of donor-specific antibodies directed against donor HLA (human leukocyte antigen) before and after transplantation is still a matter of debate. As histocompatibility testing is not required for each patient according to the current national guidelines and Eurotransplant recommendations for lung transplantation, each transplantation unit has to establish a local protocol together with the tissue typing laboratory how to implement an immunological risk assessment strategy for their patients while enabling access to transplantation. Desensitization regimens might help in case of highly alloimmunized patients waiting for urgent transplantation.

Characterization of the C1q-Binding Ability and the IgG1-4 Subclass Profile of Preformed Anti-HLA Antibodies by Solid-Phase Assays

Humoral alloimmunity, particularly that triggered by preformed antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA), is associated with an increased prevalence of rejection and reduced transplant survival. The high sensitivity of solid phase assays, based on microbeads coated with single antigens (SAB), consolidated them as the gold-standard method to characterize anti-HLA antibodies, ensuring a successful allograft allocation. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) provided by SAB is regularly used to stratify the immunological risk, assuming it as a reliable estimation of the antibody-level, but it is often limited by artifacts. Beyond MFI, other properties, such as the complement-binding ability or the IgG1-4 subclass profile have been examined to more accurately define the clinical relevance of antibodies and clarify their functional properties. However, there are still unresolved issues. Neat serum-samples from 20 highly-sensitized patients were analyzed by SAB-panIgG, SAB-IgG1-4 subclass and SAB-C1q assays. All 1:16 diluted serum-samples were additionally analyzed by SAB-panIgG and SAB-IgG1-4 subclass assays. A total of 1,285 anti-HLA antibodies were identified as positive, 473 (36.8%) of which were C1q-binding. As expected, serum-dilution enhanced the correlation between the C1q-binding ability and the antibody-strength, measured as the MFI (r_neat = 0.248 vs. r_diluted = 0.817). SAB-subclass assay revealed at least one IgG1-4 subclass in 1,012 (78.8%) positive antibody-specificities. Among them, strong complement-binding subclasses, mainly IgG1, were particularly frequent (98.9%) and no differences were found between C1q- and non-C1q-binding antibodies regarding their presence (99.4 vs. 98.5%; p = 0.193). In contrast, weak or non-C1q-binding subclasses (IgG2/IgG4) were more commonly detected in C1q-binding antibodies (78.9 vs. 38.6%; p < 0.001). Interestingly, a strong association was found between the C1q-binding ability and the IgG1 strength (r_IgG1dil = 0.796). Though lower, the correlation between the IgG2 strength and the C1q-binding ability was also strong (r_IgG2dil = 0.758), being both subclasses closely related (r_IgG1−IgG2 = 0.817). We did not find any correlation with the C1q-binding ability considering the remaining subclasses. In conclusion, we demonstrate that a particular profile of IgG subclasses (IgG1/IgG3) itself does not determine at all the ability to bind complement of anti-HLA antibodies assessed by SAB-C1q assay. It is the IgG subclass strength, mainly of IgG1, which usually appears in combination with IgG2, that best correlates with it.

The role of complement in antibody mediated transplant rejection

Antibody mediated transplant rejection (AMR) is a major cause of long-term allograft failure, and currently available treatments are of limited efficacy for treating the disease. AMR is caused by donor specific antibodies (DSA) that bind to antigens within the transplanted organ. DSA usually activate the classical pathway of complement within the allograft, and complement activation is believed to be an important cause of tissue injury in AMR. Several new clinical assays may improve our ability to identify patients at risk of AMR. Complement inhibitory drugs have also been tested in selected patients and in small series. Better understanding of the role of complement activation in the pathogenesis of AMR will likely improve our ability to diagnose the disease and to develop novel treatments.

Detection of Complement-binding Donor-specific Antibodies, Not IgG-antibody Strength Nor C4d Status, at Antibody-mediated Rejection Diagnosis Is an Independent Predictor of Kidney Graft Failure

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains associated with reduced kidney graft survival and no clear prognostic marker is available.

METHODS

We investigated whether donor-specific antibodies (DSA) ability to bind C1q in comparison with AMR C4d status, both indirect signs of complement activation, improve risk stratification at time of AMR. Hence, among 467 patients in whom 1 or more graft biopsies were performed between 2008 and 2015, we included 56 with AMR according to Banff '15 criteria. Using concurrent sera, we prospectively identified DSA by single-antigen beads (IgG and C1q) assays.

RESULTS

Antibody-mediated rejection C4d (+) (n = 28) was associated with preformed DSA (P = 0.007), whereas DSA C1q (+) (n = 25) cases had stronger IgG-DSA (P < 0.001). At AMR, graft function was similar between DSA C1q groups, but in the first year after, it improved in DSA C1q (-), whereas a steady decline was observed in DSA C1q (+) cases, remaining significantly lower from 1 year until 4 years after AMR. DSA C1q (+) was significantly associated with reduced graft survival (P = 0.021), whereas AMR C4d (+) was not (P = 0.550). Importantly, a similar negative impact of DSA C1q (+) on graft survival was observed within AMR C4d (+) (P = 0.040) and (-) (P = 0.036), cases. In multivariable analysis, DSA C1q (+) (hazard ratio, 3.939, P = 0.005) and de novo DSA (hazard ratio, 4.409, P = 0.033) were independent predictors of graft failure, but stronger IgG-DSA was not. Similar results were obtained considering C1q-DSA and IgG-DSA strength as continuous variables.

CONCLUSIONS

C1q-DSA assessment at AMR can be a valuable tool in detecting patients with higher risk of graft failure.

Sensitization in Heart Transplantation: Emerging Knowledge: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Sensitization, defined as the presence of circulating antibodies, presents challenges for heart transplant recipients and physicians. When present, sensitization can limit a transplantation candidate’s access to organs, prolong wait time, and, in some cases, exclude the candidate from heart transplantation altogether. The management of sensitization is not yet standardized, and current therapies have not yielded consistent results. Although current strategies involve antibody suppression and removal with intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and antibody therapy, newer strategies with more specific targets are being investigated.

Detecting donor-specific antibodies: the importance of sorting the wheat from the chaff

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility is very important for successful transplantation of solid organs. In this paper, we focused on the humoral arm of immunity in the clinical setting of organ transplantation: how HLA antibodies develop, how they can be detected, and what they can do to injure organ transplants. Specifically, we explore the technical perspectives of detecting donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in HLA laboratories, and use real-life clinical cases to explain the principles. Currently there are many tools in our HLA antibody detection toolbox: conventional cytotoxicity cross match, flow cross match, and solid phase assays using beads conjugated with single or multiple HLA antigens. Single antigen bead (SAB) assay is the most sensitive tool available for detecting HLA antibodies and assessing the immunological risk for organ transplant. However, there are intrinsic limitations to solid-phase assays and they are prone to both false negativity and importantly, false positivity. Denatured antigens on single antigen beads might be the most prominent source of false positive reactivity, and may have been underestimated by many HLA experts. No single assay is perfect and therefore multiple methods, including the less sensitive assays, should be employed to determine the clinical relevance of detected HLA antibodies. Thoughtful process, including knowledge of HLA systems, cross reactivity, epitopes, and the patient's clinical history should be employed to correctly interpret data. The clinical team should work closely with HLA laboratories to ensure accurate interpretation of information and optimal management of patients before and after organ transplantation.

Prognostic Value of the Persistence of C1q-Binding Anti-HLA Antibodies in Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The differential pathogenicity of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is not fully understood. The presence of complement-binding DSAs helps in better defining the prognosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The evolution of these antibodies after the treatment of ABMR is unknown.

METHODS

We included patients from the French multicenter RITUX ERAH study diagnosed with acute ABMR within the first year of renal transplantation, with circulating anti-HLA DSAs and treated randomly by rituximab or placebo (and intravenous immunoglobulins, plasma exchange). We centrally analyzed serum samples at the time of ABMR, 3 and 6 months after ABMR, with anti-HLA DSAs specificities and C1q-binding capacity assessment.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included: 68% had C1q-binding DSAs at the time of ABMR. The presence of C1q-binding DSAs was associated with a poorer evolution of chronic glomerulopathy at 6 months (P = 0.036). The persistence of C1q-binding DSAs at 3 and/or 6 months after ABMR was associated with more severe chronic glomerulopathy (P = 0.006), greater C4d score deposition score at 6 months after ABMR (P = 0.008), and graft loss 5 years after ABMR (P = 0.029). C1q-binding capacity was associated with the DSA MFI but 5 C1q-binding DSAs in 4 patients had low MFI values without a prozone effect.

CONCLUSION

The presence and persistence of anti-HLA C1q-binding DSAs after ABMR is a detrimental marker, leading to transplant glomerulopathy and graft loss. Assessment of the complement-binding capacities of DSAs could help decide treatment intensification.

Clinical utility of complement-dependent C3d assay in kidney recipients presenting with late allograft dysfunction

The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of a complement-dependent C3d assay to risk stratify donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in a multicenter cohort of kidney recipients presenting with new-onset clinical dysfunction. A total of 106 subjects with evidence of DSA at a mean period of 5.3 ± 5.0 years posttransplant underwent testing using C3d reagents. C3d positivity was strongly associated with both the peak and sum IgG DSA MFI, with 98.3% (n = 57/58) of strongly reactive sera (peak MFI > 10 000) eliciting a positive signal. Patients with C3d+ DSA had a higher creatinine (P = .03), more significant graft fibrosis (P = .035), and a faster rate of graft loss posttest compared to those with C3d- DSA (P = .05). Subanalysis of patients with low-moderate level DSA confirmed the inferior outcome associated with C3d positivity. Despite the prognostic value of C3d as a stand-alone test, the assay did not provide independent risk prediction after incorporation of graft fibrosis in a multivariate model (P = .94). Overall, C3d offered limited discriminatory value for strong DSA with peak IgG MFI > 10 000 and in patients where histologic data is available, but its utilization may be considered in those with low-moderate level DSA and where an allograft biopsy is not accessible.

Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential

In transplantation, development of humoral alloimmunity against donor HLA is a major cause of organ transplant failure, but our ability to assess the immunological risk associated with a potential donor–recipient HLA combination is limited. We hypothesized that the capacity of donor HLA to induce a specific alloantibody response depends on their structural and physicochemical dissimilarity compared with recipient HLA. To test this hypothesis, we first developed a novel computational scoring system that enables quantitative assessment of surface electrostatic potential differences between donor and recipient HLA molecules at the tertiary structure level [three-dimensional electrostatic mismatch score (EMS-3D)]. We then examined humoral alloimmune responses in healthy females subjected to a standardized injection of donor lymphocytes from their male partner. This analysis showed a strong association between the EMS-3D of donor HLA and donor-specific alloantibody development; this relationship was strongest for HLA-DQ alloantigens. In the clinical transplantation setting, the immunogenic potential of HLA-DRB1 and -DQ mismatches expressed on donor kidneys, as assessed by their EMS-3D, was an independent predictor of development of donor-specific alloantibody after graft failure. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the translational potential of our approach to improve immunological risk assessment and to decrease the burden of humoral alloimmunity in organ transplantation.

Maintaining the Health of the Renal Allograft: Laboratory and Histologic Monitoring After Kidney Transplantation

Advances in posttransplant care, including new immunosuppressive medications have led to excellent short-term renal allograft survival. However, there is a small therapeutic window within which the patient and the clinician must balance the risk of rejection, with side effects such as infection, malignancy, and toxicity. Laboratory testing plays a key role in this ongoing monitoring, which includes relatively simple tests, such as serum creatinine, to complex tests, such as solid-phase assays, used to monitor for donor-specific antibody and surveillance allograft biopsies. This article reviews the role of the laboratory tests and surveillance biopsies in posttransplant monitoring.

Implication of antibodies against human leukocyte antigen in simultaneous presentation of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia and neutropenia

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) and neonatal alloimmune neutropenia (NAN) are two rare complications of newborns caused by antibodies against paternal inherited antigens. Human platelet (HPA) and neutrophil antigens (HNA) are the common targets. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I proteins are also expressed on platelets and neutrophils and anti-HLA antibodies have occasionally been implicated in these complications. We report a premature twin infant who presented with severe thrombocytopenia and neutropenia clinically compatible with FNAIT and NAN, from a mother with no identifiable HPA or HNA antibodies, but with very high levels of complement-fixing antibodies against paternal inherited HLA. These antibodies were also detected in the infant. HLA antibodies are commonly present in multiparous women who deliver healthy infants. They can, however, be cytotoxic and cause clinical complications after blood products transfusion (TRALI and becoming refractory to platelets transfusion) and after organ transplantation (allogeneic organ rejection).

Anti-HLA Donor-Specific IgG Subclasses and C1q-binding Evolution in Posttransplant Monitoring

Background

The identification of low-level antibodies by single-antigen bead methodology has brought advancements to risk evaluation of kidney transplant recipients. However, the use of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) to quantify antibodies and to guide therapy is not enough. Notably, immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclass switching is hypothesized to follow a programmed sequence after an emergency signal from the germinal center. In transplantation this process is not clear yet. In the present study, we sequentially evaluate anti-HLA donor specific antibody (DSA) subclasses, their profile changes, and C1q-binding ability and the influence of those characteristics on antibody mediated rejection (AMR) occurrence and allograft function.

Methods

A total of 30 DSA-positive patients were tested for IgG subclass content and C1q-binding in sequential serum samples.

Results

Twenty-one patients were DSA-positive before transplant; patients sensitized only by transfusion or pregnancies had IgG1 and/or IgG3, and patients sensitized by both transfusion and pregnancies or previous transplant showed a broader range of IgG subclasses. C1q binding was detected in high MFI made up of IgG1 or multiple IgG subclasses. Only 4 patients were positive for C1q posttransplantation and 3 of these showed an increase in MFI, changes in subclasses patterns, AMR, and allograft dysfunction.

Conclusions

Posttransplant evaluation of DSA subclasses and the ability to bind C1q may be informative for both AMR occurrence and allograft dysfunction. Monitoring these events may help to better define risk and interventional time points.

C3d-binding Donor-specific HLA Antibody Is Associated With a High Risk of Antibody-mediated Rejection and Graft Loss in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

One risk factor for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and poor outcome after kidney transplantation is donor-specific anti‒human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies (DSAs). In this study we sought to determine whether the presence of DSAs that bind complement component C3d could better predict ABMR and graft loss in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

METHODS

We included 220 stable KTRs in this study and screened them for DSAs from July 2013 to July 2016.

RESULTS

Of the 220 KTRs, DSAs were detected in 24 (10.9%). The incidence of ABMR was 3.6% (8 of 220) overall, and C3d-DSA‒positive KTRs had a significantly higher incidence than SA-DSA‒positive KTRs (63.3% vs 38.9%, P = .03). Most C3d-binding DSAs were anti-HLA class II antibodies (11 of 13, 84.6%). Class II C3d-binding DSA was also significantly associated with graft failure on multivariate analysis, as were ABMR, chronic ABMR, and high serum creatinine. Class II C3d-binding DSA was also significantly associated with lower graft survival after ABMR.

CONCLUSION

C3d-binding DSA, especially class II, was significantly associated with the risk of ABMR and graft loss in stable KTRs. We suggest that monitoring of stable KTRs for C3d-binding DSA, followed by biopsy, could aid in early recognition of ABMR and prevention of graft loss.

Application, technical issues, and interpretation of C1q for graft outcome

Significant interest and controversy surround the use of C1q for determining risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss. Alternate models for predicting outcomes have been proposed. This review focuses on the correlation of currently utilized assays for outcome, together with the technical and theoretical limitations, to distill current thinking.

Antibody-mediated rejection: New approaches in prevention and management

Despite the success of desensitization protocols, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a significant contributor to renal allograft failure in patients with donor-specific antibodies. Plasmapheresis and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin have proved to be effective treatments to prevent and treat AMR, but irreversible injury in the form of transplant glomerulopathy can commonly manifest months to years later. There is an unmet need to improve the outcomes for patients at risk for AMR. Updated Banff criteria now take into account the increasing understanding of the complex and heterogeneous nature of AMR phenotypes, including the timing of rejection, subclinical and chronic AMR, C4d-negative AMR, and antibody-mediated vascular rejection. Treatment for AMR is not standardized, and there is little in the way of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Refining more precisely the mechanisms of injury responsible for different AMR phenotypes and establishing relevant surrogate endpoints to facilitate more informative studies will likely allow for more accurate determination of prognosis and efficacious intervention using new therapeutic approaches. In addition to plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin, a number of other add-on therapies have been tried in small studies without consistent benefit, including anti-CD20, proteasome inhibitors, complement inhibitors, anti-interleukin-6 receptor blockers, and immunoglobulin G-degrading enzyme of Streptococcus pyogenes (called IdeS).

Clinical risk stratification of paediatric renal transplant recipients using C1q and C3d fixing of de novo donor-specific antibodies

INTRODUCTION

We have previously shown that children who developed de novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) had greater decline in allograft function. We hypothesised that patients with complement-activating DSA would have poorer renal allograft outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 75 children developed DSA in the original study. The first positive DSA sample was subsequently tested for C1q and C3d fixing. The primary event was defined as 50% reduction from baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate and was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

Of 65 patients tested, 32 (49%) and 23 (35%) tested positive for C1q and C3d fixing, respectively. Of the 32 C1q-positive (c1q+) patients, 13 (41%) did not show concomitant C3d fixing. The mean fluorescence intensity values of the original immunoglobulin G DSA correlated poorly with complement-fixing positivity (C1q: adjusted R ² 0.072; C3d: adjusted R ² 0.11; p < 0.05). C1q+ antibodies were associated with acute tubulitis [0.75 ± 0.18 (C1q+) vs. 0.25 ± 0.08 (C1q-) episodes per patient (mean ± standard error of the mean; p < 0.05] but not with worse long-term renal allograft dysfunction (median time to primary event 5.9 (C1q+) vs. 6.4 (C1q-) years; hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence ratio (CI) 0.30-1.81; p = 0.58]. C3d-positive (C3d+) antibodies were associated with positive C4d histological staining [47% (C3d+) vs. 20% (C3d-); p = 0.04] and with significantly worse long-term allograft dysfunction [median time to primary event: 5.6 (C3d+) vs. 6.5 (C3d-) years; HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.97; p = 0.04].

CONCLUSION

Assessment of C3d fixing as part of prospective HLA monitoring can potentially aid stratification of patients at the highest risk of long-term renal allograft dysfunction.

Clinically relevant interpretation of solid phase assays for HLA antibody

Purpose of review

Accurate and timely detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies are critical for pre-transplant and post-transplant immunological risk assessment. Solid phase immunoassays have provided increased sensitivity and specificity, but test interpretation is not always straightforward. This review will discuss the result interpretation considering technical limitations; assessment of relative antibody strength; and the integration of data for risk stratification from complementary testing and the patient's immunological history.

Recent findings

Laboratory and clinical studies have provided insight into causes of test failures – false positive reactions because of antibodies to denatured HLA antigens and false negative reactions resulting from test interference and/or loss of native epitopes. Test modifications permit detection of complement-binding antibodies and determination of the IgG subclasses. The high degree of specificity of single antigen solid phase immunoassays has revealed the complexity and clinical relevance of antibodies to HLA-C, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DP antigens. Determination of antibody specificity for HLA epitopes enables identification of incompatible antigens not included in test kits.

Summary

Detection and characterization of HLA antibodies with solid phase immunoassays has led to increased understanding of the role of those antibodies in graft rejection, improved treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, and increased opportunities for transplantation. However, realization of these benefits requires careful and accurate interpretation of test results.

Evidence for an important role of both complement-binding and noncomplement-binding donor-specific antibodies in renal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review describes the current clinical relevance of circulating anti-human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies in kidney transplantation and discusses recent improvements in their characterization that provide new insights into the identification and management of important clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies addressing the relationships between donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (HLA-DSA) properties (i.e., their strength, complement-binding capacity, and IgG subclass composition) and allograft injury and survival have highlighted their relevance in the prediction of antibody-mediated injury and allograft loss.

SUMMARY

Antibody-mediated rejection is the leading cause of kidney allograft loss. Although considerable experimental and clinical evidence suggests a causal effect of circulating HLA-DSAs in antibody-mediated rejection and allograft failure, HLA-DSAs induce a wide spectrum of injuries to the allograft that illustrate the need to delineate the characteristics of HLA-DSAs that confer pathogenesis. Current risk stratification is based on HLA-DSA characteristics, including antibody specificity, HLA class, and strength. Recently, the complement-binding capacity of HLA-DSAs has been recognized as a clinically relevant marker for predicting pathogenicity and allograft loss. Emerging data also support a role for HLA-DSA IgG subclass composition in discriminating distinct patterns of antibody-mediated injury. This progress in our understanding of HLA-DSA pathogenicity provides new tools to stratify individual immunological risks. However, specific prospective studies addressing immunological risk stratification in large and unselected populations are required to define the clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of such a comprehensive assessment of HLA-DSAs before implementation in current clinical practice.

Impact of Preformed Donor-Specific Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody C1q-Binding Ability on Kidney Allograft Outcome

The consolidation of single antigen beads (SAB-panIgG) assay in the detection of preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has improved transplantation success. However, its high sensitivity has limited the allograft allocation for sensitized patients, increasing their waiting time. A modification of the standard SAB-panIgG assay allows the detection of that subset of antibodies capable of binding C1q (SAB-C1q assay). However, the clinical usefulness of SAB-C1q assay for determining the unacceptable mismatches is under discussion. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) according to the C1q-binding ability on allograft outcome, examining 389 single-kidney transplanted patients from deceased donors. Recipients with preformed C1q-binding DSA showed the lowest allograft survival up to 7 years (40.7%) compared to patients with preformed non-C1q-binding DSA (73.4%; p = 0.001) and without DSA (79.1%; p < 0.001). Allograft survival rate was similar between patients with preformed non-C1q-binding DSA and patients without preformed DSA (p = 0.403). Interestingly, among the high-mean fluorescence intensity DSA (≥10,000) population (n = 46), those patients whose DSA were further capable of binding C1q showed a poorer allograft outcome (38.4 vs. 68.9%; p = 0.041). Moreover, in our multivariate predictive model for assessing the risk of allograft loss, the presence of C1q-binding DSA (HR 4.012; CI 95% 2.326–6.919; p < 0.001) but not of non-C1q-binding DSA (HR 1.389; CI 95% 0.784–2.461; p = 0.260) remained an independent predictor after stratifying the DSA population according to the C1q-binding ability and adjusting the model for other pre-transplantation predictive factors including donor age, cold-ischemia time, and HLA-DR mismatches. In conclusion, the unacceptable mismatch definition according to the SAB-C1q assay would improve the risk stratification of allograft loss and increase the limited allograft allocation of highly sensitized patients, shortening their waiting time.

Technical Limitations of the C1q Single-Antigen Bead Assay to Detect Complement Binding HLA-Specific Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Solid-phase assays to distinguish complement binding from noncomplement binding HLA-specific antibodies have been introduced, but technical limitations may compromise their interpretation. We have examined the extent to which C1q-binding to HLA-class I single-antigen beads (SAB) is influenced by denatured HLA on SAB, antibody titre, and complement interference that causes a misleading low assessment of HLA-specific antibody levels.

METHODS

Sera from 25 highly sensitized patients were tested using Luminex IgG-SAB and C1q-SAB assays. Sera were tested undiluted, at 1:20 dilution to detect high-level IgG, and after ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid treatment to obviate complement interference. Conformational HLA and denatured HLA protein levels on SAB were determined using W6/32 and HC-10 monoclonal antibodies, respectively. Denatured HLA was expressed as HC-10 binding to untreated SAB as a percentage of maximal binding to acid-treated SAB.

RESULTS

For undiluted sera, Luminex mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values for IgG-SAB and C1q-SAB correlated poorly (r = 0.42). ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid and serum dilution improved the correlation (r = 0.57 and 0.77, respectively). Increasing levels of denatured HLA interfered with the detection of C1q binding. Consequently, the correlation between IgG-SAB MFI and C1q-SAB MFI was lowest using undiluted sera and SAB with greater than 30% denatured HLA (r = 0.40) and highest using diluted sera and SAB with 30% or less denatured HLA (r = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Antibody level, complement interference, and denatured HLA class I on SAB may all affect the clinical interpretation of the C1q-SAB assay. The C1q-SAB assay represents a substantial additional cost for routine clinical use, and we question its justification given the potential uncertainty about its interpretation.