Elevated urinary CXCL10-to-creatinine ratio is associated with subclinical and clinical rejection in pediatric renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2015;99:797-804. [PMID: 25222013 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000419]

Non-invasive biomarkers of acute rejection in pediatric kidney transplantation: New targets and strategies

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for pediatric end-stage renal disease. However, pediatric recipients face unique challenges due to their prolonged need for kidney function to accommodate growth and development. The continual changes in the immune microenvironment during childhood development and the heightened risk of complications from long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs. The overwhelming majority of children may require more than one kidney transplant in their lifetime. Acute rejection (AR) stands as the primary cause of kidney transplant failure in children. While pathologic biopsy remains the "gold standard" for diagnosing renal rejection, its invasive nature raises concerns regarding potential functional impairment and the psychological impact on children due to repeated procedures. In this review, we outline the current research status of novel biomarkers associated with AR in urine and blood after pediatric kidney transplantation. These biomarkers exhibit superior diagnostic and prognostic performance compared to conventional ones, with the added advantages of being less invasive and highly reproducible for long-term graft monitoring. We also integrate the limitations of these novel biomarkers and propose a refined monitoring model to optimize the management of AR in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Immune monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation remain suboptimal, largely related to chronic rejection. Creatinine is a late marker of renal injury, and more sensitive, early markers of allograft injury are an active area of current research.

METHODS

This is an educational review summarizing existing strategies for monitoring for rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

RESULTS

We summarize supporting currently available clinical tests, including surveillance biopsy, donor specific antibodies, and donor-derived cell free DNA, as well as the potential limitations of these studies. In addition, we review the current avenues of active research, including transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and torque tenovirus levels.

CONCLUSION

Advancing the use of noninvasive immune monitoring will depend on well-designed multicenter trials that include patients with stable graft function, include biopsy results on all patients, and can demonstrate both association with a patient-relevant clinical endpoint such as graft survival or change in glomerular filtration rate and a potential timepoint for intervention.

Optimizing the approach to monitoring allograft inflammation using serial urinary CXCL10/creatinine testing in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Urinary CXCL10/creatinine (uCXCL10/Cr) is proposed as an effective biomarker of subclinical rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. This study objective was to model implementation in the clinical setting.

METHODS

Banked urine samples at a single center were tested for uCXCL10/Cr to validate published thresholds for rejection diagnosis (>80% specificity). The positive predictive value (PPV) for rejection diagnosis for uCXCL10/Cr-indicated biopsy was modeled with first-positive versus two-test-positive approaches, with accounting for changes associated with urinary tract infection (UTI), BK and CMV viremia, and subsequent recovery.

RESULTS

Seventy patients aged 10.5 ± 5.6 years at transplant (60% male) had n = 726 urine samples with n = 236 associated biopsies (no rejection = 167, borderline = 51, and Banff 1A = 18). A threshold of 12 ng/mmol was validated for Banff 1A versus no-rejection diagnosis (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.92). The first-positive test approach (n = 69) did not resolve a clinical diagnosis in 38 cases (55%), whereas the two-test approach resolved a clinical diagnosis in the majority as BK (n = 17/60, 28%), CMV (n = 4/60, 7%), UTI (n = 8/60, 13%), clinical rejection (n = 5/60, 8%), and transient elevation (n = 18, 30%). In those without a resolved clinical diagnosis, PPV from biopsy for subclinical rejection is 24% and 71% (p = .017), for first-test versus two-test models, respectively. After rejection treatment, uCXCL10/Cr level changes were all concordant with change in it-score. Sustained uCXCL10/Cr after CMV and BK viremia resolution was associated with later acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary CXCL10/Cr reliably identifies kidney allograft inflammation. These data support a two-test approach to reliably exclude other clinically identifiable sources of inflammation, for kidney biopsy indication to rule out subclinical rejection.

Preeclampsia at term: evidence of disease heterogeneity based on the profile of circulating cytokines and angiogenic factors

BACKGROUND

Intravascular inflammation and an antiangiogenic state have been implicated in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. On the basis of the profiles of their angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors, women with preeclampsia at term may be classified into 2 subgroups with different characteristics and prevalence of adverse outcomes. This study was undertaken to examine whether these 2 subgroups of preeclampsia at term also show differences in their profiles of intravascular inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the plasma profiles of cytokines and chemokines in women with preeclampsia at term who had a normal or an abnormal angiogenic profile.

STUDY DESIGN

A nested case-control study was conducted to include women classified into 3 groups: women with an uncomplicated pregnancy (n=213) and women with preeclampsia at term with a normal (n=55) or an abnormal (n=41) angiogenic profile. An abnormal angiogenic profile was defined as a plasma ratio of placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 multiple of the median <10th percentile for gestational age. Concentrations of cytokines were measured by multiplex immunoassays.

RESULTS

Women with preeclampsia at term and an abnormal angiogenic profile showed evidence of the greatest intravascular inflammation among the study groups. These women had higher plasma concentrations of 5 cytokines (interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-12/interleukin-23p40, interleukin-15, and interleukin-16) and 7 chemokines (eotaxin, eotaxin-3, interferon-γ inducible protein-10, monocyte chemotactic protein-4, macrophage inflammatory protein-1β, macrophage-derived chemokine, and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine compared to women with an uncomplicated pregnancy. By contrast, women with preeclampsia at term and a normal angiogenic profile, compared to women with an uncomplicated pregnancy, had only a higher plasma concentration of monocyte chemotactic protein-4. A correlation between severity of the antiangiogenic state, blood pressure, and plasma concentrations of a subset of cytokines was observed.

CONCLUSION

Term preeclampsia can be classified into 2 clusters. One is characterized by an antiangiogenic state coupled with an excessive inflammatory process, whereas the other has neither of these features. These findings further support the heterogeneity of preeclampsia at term and may explain the distinct clinical outcomes.

Automated Urinary Chemokine Assays for Noninvasive Detection of Kidney Transplant Rejection: A Prospective Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Prior studies have demonstrated the diagnostic potential of urinary chemokines C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9) and CXCL10 for kidney transplant rejection. However, their benefit in addition to clinical information has not been demonstrated. We evaluated the diagnostic performance for detecting acute rejection of urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 when integrated with clinical information.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center prospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We analyzed 1,559 biopsy-paired urinary samples from 622 kidney transplants performed between April 2013 and July 2019 at a single transplant center in Belgium. External validation was performed in 986 biopsy-paired urinary samples.

TESTS COMPARED

We quantified urinary CXCL9 (uCXCL9) and CXCL10 (uCXCL10) using an automated immunoassay platform and normalized the values to urinary creatinine. Urinary chemokines were incorporated into a multivariable model with routine clinical markers (estimated glomerular filtration rate, donor-specific antibodies, and polyoma viremia) (integrated model). This model was then compared with the tissue diagnosis according to the Banff classification for acute rejection.

OUTCOME

Acute rejection detected on kidney biopsy using the Banff classification.

RESULTS

Chemokines integrated with routine clinical markers had high diagnostic value for detection of acute rejection (n=150) (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve 81.3% [95% CI, 77.6-85.0]). The integrated model would help avoid 59 protocol biopsies per 100 patients when the risk for rejection is predicted to be below 10%. The performance of the integrated model was similar in the external validation cohort.

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional nature obviates investigating the evolution over time and prediction of future rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an integrated model of urinary chemokines and clinical markers for noninvasive monitoring of rejection could enable a reduction in the number of biopsies. Urinary chemokines may be useful noninvasive biomarkers whose use should be further studied in prospective randomized trials to clarify their role in guiding clinical care and the use of biopsies to detect rejection after kidney transplantation.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 have been suggested to be good noninvasive biomarkers of kidney transplant rejection. However, defining a context of use and integration with clinical information is necessary before clinical implementation can begin. In this study, we demonstrated that urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, together with clinical information, have substantial diagnostic accuracy for the detection of acute kidney transplant rejection. Application of urinary chemokines together with clinical information may guide biopsy practices following kidney transplantation and potentially reduce the need for kidney transplant biopsies.

Urine CXCL10 as a biomarker in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Urine CXCL10 is a promising biomarker for posttransplant renal allograft monitoring but is currently not widely used for clinical management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Large retrospective studies and data from a prospective randomized trial as well as a prospective cohort study demonstrate that low urine CXCL10 levels are associated with a low risk of rejection and can exclude BK polyomavirus replication with high certainty. Urine CXCL10 can either be used as part of a multiparameter based risk assessment tool, or as an individual biomarker taking relevant confounders into account. A novel Luminex-based CXCL10 assay has been validated in a multicenter study, and proved to be robust, reproducible, and accurate.

SUMMARY

Urine CXCL10 is a well characterized inflammation biomarker, which can be used to guide performance of surveillance biopsies. Wide implementation into clinical practice depends on the availability of inexpensive, thoroughly validated assays with approval from regulatory authorities.

Immunogenicity and tolerance induction in vascularized composite allotransplantation

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is the transplantation of multiple tissues such as skin, muscle, bone, nerve, and vessels, as a functional unit (i.e., hand or face) to patients suffering from major tissue trauma and functional deficits. Though the surgical feasibility has been optimized, issues regarding graft rejection remains. VCA rejection involves a diverse population of cells but is primarily driven by both donor and recipient lymphocytes, antigen-presenting cells, macrophages, and other immune as well as donor-derived cells. In addition, it is commonly understood that different tissues within VCA, such as the skin, elicits a stronger rejection response. Currently, VCA recipients are required to follow potent and lifelong immunosuppressing regimens to maximize graft survival. This puts patients at risk for malignancies, opportunistic infections, and cancers, thereby posing a need for less perilous methods of inducing graft tolerance. This review will provide an overview of cell populations and mechanisms, specific tissue involved in VCA rejection, as well as an updated scope of current methods of tolerance induction.

Proteomic analysis investigating kidney transplantation outcomes- a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment option for most patients with end-stage kidney disease given the significantly lower morbidity and mortality rates compared to remaining on dialysis. Rejection and graft failure remain common in transplant recipients with limited improvement in long-term transplant outcomes despite therapeutic advances. There is an unmet need in the development of non-invasive biomarkers that specifically monitor graft function and predict transplant pathologies that affect outcomes. Despite the potential of proteomic investigatory approaches, up to now, no candidate biomarkers of sufficient sensitivity or specificity have translated into clinical use. The aim of this review was to collate and summarise protein findings and protein pathways implicated in the literature to date, and potentially flag putative biomarkers worth validating in independent patient cohorts.

METHODS

This review followed the Joanna Briggs' Institute Methodology for a scoping review. MedlineALL, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception until December 2022. Abstract and full text review were undertaken independently by two reviewers. Data was collated using a pre-designed data extraction tool.

RESULTS

One hundred one articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority were single-centre retrospective studies of small sample size. Mass spectrometry was the most used technique to evaluate differentially expressed proteins between diagnostic groups and studies identified various candidate biomarkers such as immune or structural proteins.

DISCUSSION

Putative immune or structural protein candidate biomarkers have been identified using proteomic techniques in multiple sample types including urine, serum and fluid used to perfuse donor kidneys. The most consistent findings implicated proteins associated with tubular dysfunction and immunological regulatory pathways such as leukocyte trafficking. However, clinical translation and adoption of candidate biomarkers is limited, and these will require comprehensive evaluation in larger prospective, multicentre trials.

Rejection markers in kidney transplantation: do new technologies help children?

Recent insights in allorecognition and graft rejection mechanisms revealed a more complex picture than originally considered, involving multiple pathways of both adaptive and innate immune response, supplied by efficient inflammatory synergies. Current pillars of transplant monitoring are serum creatinine, proteinuria, and drug blood levels, which are considered as traditional markers, due to consolidated experience, low cost, and widespread availability. The most diffuse immunological biomarkers are donor-specific antibodies, which are included in routine post-transplant monitoring in many centers, although with some reproducibility issues and interpretation difficulties. Confirmed abnormalities in these traditional biomarkers raise the suspicion for rejection and guide the indication for graft biopsy, which is still considered the gold standard for rejection monitoring. Rapidly evolving new "omic" technologies have led to the identification of several novel biomarkers, which may change the landscape of transplant monitoring should their potential be confirmed. Among them, urinary chemokines and measurement of cell-free DNA of donor origin are perhaps the most promising. However, at the moment, these approaches remain highly expensive and cost-prohibitive in most settings, with limited clinical applicability; approachable costs upon technology investments would speed their integration. In addition, transcriptomics, metabolomics, proteomics, and the study of blood and urinary extracellular vesicles have the potential for early identification of subclinical rejection with high sensitivity and specificity, good reproducibility, and for gaining predictive value in an affordable cost setting. In the near future, information derived from these new biomarkers is expected to integrate traditional tools in routine use, allowing identification of rejection prior to clinical manifestations and timely therapeutic intervention. This review will discuss traditional, novel, and invasive and non-invasive biomarkers, underlining their strengths, limitations, and present or future applications in children.

Randomized Trial to Assess the Clinical Utility of Renal Allograft Monitoring by Urine CXCL10 Chemokine

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study is the first randomized controlled trial to investigate the clinical utility of a noninvasive monitoring biomarker in renal transplantation. Although urine CXCL10 monitoring could not demonstrate a beneficial effect on 1-year outcomes, the study is a rich source for future design of trials aiming to explore the clinical utility of noninvasive biomarkers. In addition, the study supports the use of urine CXCL10 to assess the inflammatory status of the renal allograft.

BACKGROUND

Urine CXCL10 is a promising noninvasive biomarker for detection of renal allograft rejection. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of renal allograft monitoring by urine CXCL10 in a randomized trial.

METHODS

We stratified 241 patients, 120 into an intervention and 121 into a control arm. In both arms, urine CXCL10 levels were monitored at three specific time points (1, 3, and 6 months post-transplant). In the intervention arm, elevated values triggered performance of an allograft biopsy with therapeutic adaptations according to the result. In the control arm, urine CXCL10 was measured, but the results concealed. The primary outcome was a combined end point at 1-year post-transplant (death-censored graft loss, clinical rejection between month 1 and 1-year, acute rejection in 1-year surveillance biopsy, chronic active T-cell-mediated rejection in 1-year surveillance biopsy, development of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies, or eGFR <25 ml/min).

RESULTS

The incidence of the primary outcome was not different between the intervention and the control arm (51% versus 49%; relative risk (RR), 1.04 [95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.34]; P = 0.80). When including 175 of 241 (73%) patients in a per-protocol analysis, the incidence of the primary outcome was also not different (55% versus 49%; RR, 1.11 [95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.47]; P = 0.54). The incidence of the individual end points was not different as well.

CONCLUSIONS

This study could not demonstrate a beneficial effect of urine CXCL10 monitoring on 1-year outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov_ NCT03140514 ).

Multicenter Validation of a Urine CXCL10 Assay for Noninvasive Monitoring of Renal Transplants

BACKGROUND

Urine CXCL10 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10, interferon gamma-induced protein 10 [IP10]) outperforms standard-of-care monitoring for detecting subclinical and early clinical T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and may advance TCMR therapy development through biomarker-enriched trials. The goal was to perform an international multicenter validation of a CXCL10 bead-based immunoassay (Luminex) for transplant surveillance and compare with an electrochemiluminescence-based (Meso Scale Discovery [MSD]) assay used in transplant trials.

METHODS

Four laboratories participated in the Luminex assay development and evaluation. Urine CXCL10 was measured by Luminex and MSD in 2 independent adult kidney transplant trial cohorts (Basel and TMCT04). In an independent test and validation set, a linear mixed-effects model to predict (log 10 -transformed) MSD CXCL10 from Luminex CXCL10 was developed to determine the conversion between assays. Net reclassification was determined after mathematical conversion.

RESULTS

The Luminex assay was precise, with an intra- and interassay coefficient of variation 8.1% and 9.3%; showed modest agreement between 4 laboratories (R 0.96 to 0.99, P < 0.001); and correlated with known CXCL10 in a single- (n = 100 urines, R 0.94 to 0.98, P < 0.001) and multicenter cohort (n = 468 urines, R 0.92, P < 0.001) but the 2 assays were not equivalent by Passing-Bablok regression. Linear mixed-effects modeling demonstrated an intercept of -0.490 and coefficient of 1.028, showing Luminex CXCL10 are slightly higher than MSD CXCL10, but the agreement is close to 1.0. After conversion of the biopsy thresholds, the decision to biopsy would be changed for only 6% (5/85) patients showing acceptable reclassification.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate this urine CXCL10 Luminex immunoassay is robust, reproducible, and accurate, indicating it can be readily translated into clinical HLA laboratories for serial posttransplant surveillance.

Low nephron endowment increases susceptibility to renal stress and chronic kidney disease

Preterm birth results in low nephron endowment and increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). To understand the pathogenesis of AKI and CKD in preterm humans, we generated potentially novel mouse models with a 30%-70% reduction in nephron number by inhibiting or deleting Ret tyrosine kinase in the developing ureteric bud. These mice developed glomerular and tubular hypertrophy, followed by the transition to CKD, recapitulating the renal pathological changes seen in humans born preterm. We injected neonatal mice with gentamicin, a ubiquitous nephrotoxic exposure in preterm infants, and detected more severe proximal tubular injury in mice with low nephron number compared with controls with normal nephron number. Mice with low nephron number had reduced proliferative repair with more rapid development of CKD. Furthermore, mice had more profound inflammation with highly elevated levels of MCP-1 and CXCL10, produced in part by damaged proximal tubules. Our study directly links low nephron endowment with postnatal renal hypertrophy, which in this model is maladaptive and results in CKD. Underdeveloped kidneys are more susceptible to gentamicin-induced AKI, suggesting that AKI in the setting of low nephron number is more severe and further increases the risk of CKD in this vulnerable population.

The Most Promising Biomarkers of Allogeneic Kidney Transplant Rejection

Clinical transplantology is a constantly evolving field of medicine. Kidney transplantation has become standard clinical practice, and it has a significant impact on reducing mortality and improving the quality of life of patients. Allogenic transplantation induces an immune response, which may lead to the rejection of the transplanted organ. The gold standard for evaluating rejection of the transplanted kidney by the recipient's organism is a biopsy of this organ. However, due to the high invasiveness of this procedure, alternative diagnostic methods are being sought. Therefore, the biomarkers may play an essential predictive role in transplant rejection. A review of the most promising biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis prediction of allogenic kidney transplant rejection summarizes novel data on neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL-10), cystatin C (CysC), osteopontin (OPN), and clusterin (CLU) and analyses the dynamics of changes of the biomarkers mentioned above in kidney diseases and the mechanism of rejection of the transplanted kidney.

Biomarkers of alloimmune events in pediatric kidney transplantation

Alloimmune events such as the development of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA), T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) are the primary contributors to kidney transplant failure in children. For decades, a creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has been the non-invasive gold standard biomarker for detecting clinically significant alloimmune events, but it suffers from low sensitivity and specificity, especially in smaller children and older allografts. Many clinically "stable" children (based on creatinine) will have alloimmune events known as "subclinical acute rejection" (based on biopsy) that merely reflect the inadequacy of creatinine-based estimates for alloimmune injury rather than a distinct phenotype from clinical rejection with allograft dysfunction. The poor biomarker performance of creatinine leads to many unnecessary surveillance and for-cause biopsies that could be avoided by integrating non-invasive biomarkers with superior sensitivity and specificity into current clinical paradigms. In this review article, we will present and appraise the current state-of-the-art in monitoring for alloimmune events in pediatric kidney transplantation. We will first discuss the current clinical standards for assessing the presence of alloimmune injury and predicting long-term outcomes. We will review principles of biomarker medicine and the application of comprehensive metrics to assess the performance of a given biomarker against the current gold standard. We will then highlight novel blood- and urine-based biomarkers (with special emphasis on pediatric biomarker studies) that have shown superior diagnostic and prognostic performance to the current clinical standards including creatinine-based eGFR. Finally, we will review some of the barriers to translating this research and implementing emerging biomarkers into common clinical practice, and present a transformative approach to using multiple biomarker platforms at different times to optimize the detection and management of critical alloimmune events in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

Urinary donor-derived cell-free DNA as a non-invasive biomarker for BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a common cause of allograft failure. However, differentiation between BKPyVAN and type I T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is challenging when simian virus 40 (SV40) staining is negative, because of the similarities in histopathology. This study investigated whether donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) can be used to differentiate BKPyVAN. Target region capture sequencing was applied to detect the ddcfDNAs of 12 recipients with stable graft function, 22 with type I TCMR, 21 with proven BKPyVAN, and 5 with possible PyVAN. We found that urinary ddcfDNA levels were upregulated in recipients with graft injury, whereas plasma ddcfDNA levels were comparable for all groups. The median urinary concentrations and fractions of ddcfDNA in proven BKPyVAN recipients were significantly higher than those in type I TCMR recipients (10.4 vs. 6.1 ng/mL, P<0.001 and 68.4% vs. 55.3%, P=0.013, respectively). Urinary ddcfDNA fractions (not concentrations) were higher in the BKPyVAN-pure subgroup than in the BKPyVAN-rejection-like subgroup (81.30% vs. 56.64%, P=0.025). With a cut-off value of 7.81 ng/mL, urinary ddcfDNA concentrations distinguished proven BKPyVAN from type I TCMR (area under the curve (AUC)=0.848, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.734 to 0.963). These findings suggest that urinary ddcfDNA is a non-invasive biomarker which can reliably differentiate BKPyVAN from type I TCMR.

Urinary CXCL10 specifically relates to HLA-DQ eplet mismatch load in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Urinary CXCL10 (uCXCL10) is associated with graft inflammation and graft survival, but the factors related to its excretion are not well known. HLA molecular matching at epitope level allow estimating the "dissimilarity" between donor and recipient HLA more precisely, being better related to further transplant outcomes. The relationship between uCXCL10 and HLA molecular mismatch has not been previously explored.

METHODS

HLA class I and class II typing of some 65 recipients and their donors was retrospectively performed by high resolution sequence-specific-primer (Life Technologies, Brown Deer, WI). The HLA-Matchmaker 3.1 software was used to assess eplet matching. Urine samples collected on the day of the 1-year surveillance biopsy were available of these 65 patients. uCXCL10 was measured using a commercial enzyme-linked immunoassay kit.

RESULTS

1-year uCXCL10 was independently associated with HLA-DQB1 eplet mismatch load (β 0.300, 95%CI 0.010-0.058, p = 0.006). Kidney transplant recipients with a HLA-DQB1 eplet mismatch load >3 showed higher values of uCXCL10 at 1-year (p = 0.018) than those with ≤3. Patients with a HLA-DQB1 eplet mismatch load >3 with subclinical AbMR had significantly higher levels of the logarithm of 1-year uCXCL10 (No AbMR 0.88, IQR 0.37; AbMR 1.38, IQR 0.34, p = 0.002) than those without AbMR.

CONCLUSIONS

uCXCL10 specifically relates to HLA-DQ eplet mismatch load. This relationship can partly explain the previously reported association between uCXCL10 excretion and graft inflammation. An adequate evaluation of any potential non-invasive biomarker, such as uCXCL10, must take into account the HLA molecular mismatch.

Getting immunosuppression just right: the role of clinical biomarkers in predicting patient response post solid organ transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Actually, immunosuppression selection isn't based on individual immune alloreactivity, and immunosuppressive drug dosing is mainly based on the development of toxicity and the achievement of specific target concentrations. Since a successful outcome requires optimal patient risk stratification and treatment, several groups have evaluated candidate biomarkers that have shown promise in the assessment of individual immune responses, the prediction of personal pharmacodynamic effects of immunosuppressive drugs and the prognosis and diagnosis of graft outcomes..

AREAS COVERED

This review includes biomarkers that the Scientific Community in Solid Organ Transplantation currently considers to have potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of graft evolution. We have focused on recent scientific advances and expert recommendations regarding the role of specific and non-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers that are mainly involved in the T-cell-mediated response.

EXPERT OPINION

Integral pharmacologic monitoring that combines pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics and predictive pharmacodynamic biomarkers may provide crucial information and allow personal adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs at an early stage before severe adverse events ensue. Multicentre, randomized, prospective and interventional trials are needed to fine tune the established cut-off values for each biomarker and the optimal monitoring frequency for each biomarker and to accurately evaluate possible clinical confounding factors to enable correct clinical qualification.

Urinary CXCL10 Measurement in Late Renal Allograft Biopsies Predicts Outcome Even in Histologically Quiescent Patients

BACKGROUND

CXCL10 is a promising early noninvasive diagnostic marker for allograft rejection and predictive for long-term outcomes. However, its value when measured later in the posttransplant course has not yet been accurately analyzed.

METHODS

We investigated urinary CXCL10 in 141 patients from a prospective, observational renal transplant cohort with 182 clinically indicated allograft biopsies performed >12 months posttransplant and corresponding urines. Urinary CXCL10 was retrospectively quantified on stored urines using the MSD V-Plex Chemokine Panel 1 sandwich immunoassay (Meso Scale Discovery). The primary outcome was a composite of allograft loss/renal function decline (>30% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]-decrease between index biopsy and last follow-up).

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients (51%) reached the primary outcome, and their urinary CXCL10 levels were significantly higher at the time of their biopsy compared with patients with stable allograft function (median 9.3 ng/mmol vs 3.3 ng/mmol, P < .0001). Time-to-endpoint analyses according to high/low urinary CXCL10 demonstrated that low urinary CXCL10 (≤7.0 ng/mmol) was associated with 73% 5-year event-free graft survival compared with 48% with high urinary CXCL10 (>7.0 ng/mmol; P = .0001). Even in histologically quiescent patients, high urinary CXCL10 was associated with inferior endpoint-free graft survival (P = .003), and it was an independent predictor of the primary outcome (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that urinary CXCL10 has a promising diagnostic performance for detection of late allograft rejection and is an independent predictor of long-term renal allograft outcomes, even in histologically quiescent patients.

Advantages of plasmatic CXCL-10 as a prognostic and diagnostic biomarker for the risk of rejection and subclinical rejection in kidney transplantation

This study evaluate the potential of plasmatic CXCL-10 (pCXCL-10) as a pre&post transplantation prognostic and diagnostic biomarker of T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and subclinical rejection (SCR) risk in adult kidney recipients considering BKV and CMV infections as possible clinical confounder factors. Twenty-eight of 100 patients included experienced rejection (TCMR:14; ABMR:14); 8 SCR; 13 and 16 were diagnosed with BKV and CMV infection, respectively. Pre-transplantation pCXCL-10 was significantly increased in TCMR and ABMR and post-transplantation in TCMR, ABMR and SCR compared with nonrejectors. All CMV⁺ patients showed pCXCL-10 levels above the cutoff values established for rejection whereas the 80% of BKV⁺ patients showed pCXCL-10 concentration < 100 pg/mL. pCXCL-10 could improve pre-transplantation patient stratification and immunosuppressive treatment selection according to rejection risk; and after kidney transplantation could be a potential early prognostic biomarker for rejection. Clinical confounding factor in BKV⁺ and particularly in CMV⁺ patients must be discarded.

Tackling Chronic Kidney Transplant Rejection: Challenges and Promises

Despite advances in post-transplant management, the long-term survival rate of kidney grafts and patients has not improved as approximately forty percent of transplants fails within ten years after transplantation. Both immunologic and non-immunologic factors contribute to late allograft loss. Chronic kidney transplant rejection (CKTR) is often clinically silent yet progressive allogeneic immune process that leads to cumulative graft injury, deterioration of graft function. Chronic active T cell mediated rejection (TCMR) and chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) are classified as two principal subtypes of CKTR. While significant improvements have been made towards a better understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms and diagnostic classifications of CKTR, lack of early detection, differential diagnosis and effective therapies continue to pose major challenges for long-term management. Recent development of high throughput cellular and molecular biotechnologies has allowed rapid development of new biomarkers associated with chronic renal injury, which not only provide insight into pathogenesis of chronic rejection but also allow for early detection. In parallel, several novel therapeutic strategies have emerged which may hold great promise for improvement of long-term graft and patient survival. With a brief overview of current understanding of pathogenesis, standard diagnosis and challenges in the context of CKTR, this mini-review aims to provide updates and insights into the latest development of promising novel biomarkers for diagnosis and novel therapeutic interventions to prevent and treat CKTR.

Biomarker implementation: Evaluation of the decision-making impact of CXCL10 testing in a pediatric cohort

BACKGROUND

Children are at high risk for subclinical rejection, and kidney biopsy is currently used for surveillance. Our objective was to test how novel rejection biomarkers such as urinary CXCL10 may influence clinical decision-making to indicate need for a biopsy.

METHODS

A minimum dataset for standard decision-making to indicate a biopsy was established by an expert panel and used to design clinical vignettes for use in a survey. Pediatric nephrologists were recruited to review the vignettes and A) estimate rejection risk and B) decide whether to biopsy; first without and then with urinary CXCL10/Cr level. Accuracy of biopsy decisions was then tested against the biopsy results. IRA was assessed by Fleiss Kappa (κ) for binary choice and ICC for probabilities.

RESULTS

Eleven pediatric nephrologists reviewed 15 vignettes each. ICC of probability assessment for rejection improved from poor (0.28, P < .01) to fair (0.48, P < .01) with addition of CXCL10/Cr data. It did not, however, improve the IRA for decision to biopsy (K = 0.48 and K = 0.43, for the comparison). Change in clinician estimated probability of rejection with additional CXCL10/Cr data was correlated with CXCL10/Cr level (r²  = 0.7756, P < .0001). Decision accuracy went from 8/15 (53.3%) cases to 11/15 (73.3%) with CXCL10/Cr, although improvement did not achieve statistical significance. Using CXCL10/Cr alone would have been accurate in 12/15 cases (80%).

CONCLUSION

There is high variability in decision-making on biopsy indication. Urinary CXCL10/Cr improves probability estimates for risk of rejection. Training may be needed to assist nephrologists in better integrate biomarker information into clinical decision-making.

Validity and utility of urinary CXCL10/Cr immune monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

Individualized posttransplant immunosuppression is hampered by suboptimal monitoring strategies. To validate the utility of urinary CXCL10/Cr immune monitoring in children, we conducted a multicenter prospective observational study in children <21 years with serial and biopsy-associated urine samples (n = 97). Biopsies (n = 240) were categorized as normal (NOR), rejection (>i1t1; REJ), indeterminate (IND), BKV infection, and leukocyturia (LEU). An independent pediatric cohort of 180 urines was used for external validation. Ninety-seven patients aged 11.4 ± 5.5 years showed elevated urinary CXCL10/Cr in REJ (3.1, IQR 1.1, 16.4; P < .001) and BKV nephropathy (median = 5.6, IQR 1.3, 26.9; P < .001) vs. NOR (0.8, IQR 0.4, 1.5). The AUC for REJ vs. NOR was 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.86). Low (0.63) and high (4.08) CXCL10/Cr levels defined high sensitivity and specificity thresholds, respectively; validated against an independent sample set (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.86). Serial urines anticipated REJ up to 4 weeks prior to biopsy and declined within 1 month following treatment. Elevated mean CXCL10/Cr was correlated with first-year eGFR decline (ρ = -0.37, P ≤ .001), particularly when persistently exceeding ≥4.08 (ratio = 0.81; P < .04). Useful thresholds for urinary CXCL10/Cr levels reproducibly define the risk of rejection, immune quiescence, and decline in allograft function for use in real-time clinical monitoring in children.

Urinary C-X-C Motif Chemokine 10 Is Related to Acute Graft Lesions Secondary to T Cell- and Antibody-Mediated Damage

Background

Non-invasive biomarkers of graft rejection are needed to optimize the management and outcomes of kidney transplant recipients. Urinary excretion of IFN-γ-related chemokine CXCL10 is clearly associated with clinical and subclinical T cell-mediated graft inflammation, but its relationship with antibody-mediated damage has not been fully addressed. Further, the variables influencing levels of urinary CXCL10 excretion are unknown.

Material/Methods

A total of 151 kidney graft biopsies (92 surveillance and 59 indication biopsies) and 151 matched urine samples obtained before biopsy were prospectively analyzed. T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) were defined according to the 2017 Banff classification criteria. Urinary CXCL10 levels were measured by ELISA and corrected by urinary creatinine.

Results

Banff scores ‘t’, ‘i’, ‘g’, and ‘ptc’ were significantly related to urinary CXCL10 levels. Multivariate analysis showed that ‘t’ (β=0.107, P=0.001) and ‘ptc’ (β=0.093, P=0.002) were significantly associated with urinary CXCL10. Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were related to the high excretion of urinary CXCL10 at 1 year after transplantation (odds ratio [OR] 17.817, P=0.003). Urinary CXCL10 showed good discrimination ability for AbMR (AUC-ROC 0.760, P=0.001). The third tertile of urinary CXCL10 remained significantly associated with AbMR (OR 4.577, 95% confidence interval 1.799–11.646, P=0.001) after multivariate regression analysis.

Conclusions

DSA was the only variable clearly related to high urinary CXCL10 levels. Urinary CXCL10 is a good non-invasive candidate biomarker of AbMR and TCMR, supplying information independent of renal function and other variables normally used to monitor kidney transplants.

Early prognostic performance of miR155-5p monitoring for the risk of rejection: Logistic regression with a population pharmacokinetic approach in adult kidney transplant patients

Previous results from our group and others have shown that urinary pellet expression of miR155-5p and urinary CXCL-10 production could play a key role in the prognosis and diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplantation patients. Here, a logistic regression model was developed using NONMEM to quantify the relationships of miR155-5p urinary expression, CXCL-10 urinary concentration and tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure with the probability of AR in adult kidney transplant patients during the early post-transplant period. Owing to the contribution of therapeutic drug monitoring to achieving target exposure, neither tacrolimus nor MPA cumulative exposure was identified as a predictor of AR in the studied population. Even though CXCL-10 urinary concentration showed a trend, its effect on AR was not significant. In contrast, urinary miR155-5p expression was prognostic of clinical outcome. Monitoring miR155-5p urinary pellet expression together with immunosuppressive drug exposure could be very useful during routine clinical practice to identify patients with a potential high risk of rejection at the early stages of the post-transplant period. This early risk assessment would allow for the optimization of treatment and improved prevention of AR.

Urinary Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prediction of Acute Kidney Allograft Rejection: A Systematic Review

Noninvasive tools for diagnosis or prediction of acute kidney allograft rejection have been extensively investigated in recent years. Biochemical and molecular analyses of blood and urine provide a liquid biopsy that could offer new possibilities for rejection prevention, monitoring, and therefore, treatment. Nevertheless, these tools are not yet available for routine use in clinical practice. In this systematic review, MEDLINE was searched for articles assessing urinary biomarkers for diagnosis or prediction of kidney allograft acute rejection published in the last five years (from 1 January 2015 to 31 May 2020). This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles providing targeted or unbiased urine sample analysis for the diagnosis or prediction of both acute cellular and antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection were included, analyzed, and graded for methodological quality with a particular focus on study design and diagnostic test accuracy measures. Urinary C-X-C motif chemokine ligands were the most promising and frequently studied biomarkers. The combination of precise diagnostic reference in training sets with accurate validation in real-life cohorts provided the most relevant results and exciting groundwork for future studies.

A chronic rejection model and potential biomarkers for vascularized composite allotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Chronic rejection remains the Achilles heel in vascularized composite allotransplantation. Animal models to specifically study chronic rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation do not exist so far. However, there are established rat models to study chronic rejection in solid organ transplantation such as allogeneic transplantation between the rat strains Lewis and Fischer344. Thus, we initiated this study to investigate the applicability of hindlimb transplantation between these strains to imitate chronic rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation and identify potential markers.

METHODS

Allogeneic hindlimb transplantation were performed between Lewis (recipient) and Fischer344 (donor) rats with either constant immunosuppression or a high dose immunosuppressive bolus only in case of acute skin rejections. Histology, immunohistochemistry, microarray and qPCR analysis were used to detect changes in skin and muscle at postoperative day 100.

RESULTS

We were able to demonstrate significant intimal proliferation, infiltration of CD68 and CD4 positive cells, up-regulation of inflammatory cytokines and initiation of muscular fibrosis in the chronic rejection group. Microarray analysis and subsequent qPCR identified CXC ligands 9-11 as potential markers of chronic rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

The Fischer344 to Lewis hindlimb transplantation model may represent a new option to study chronic rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation in an experimental setting. CXC ligands 9-11 deserve further research to investigate their role as chronic rejection markers.

Longitudinal assessment of the CXCL10 blood and urine concentration in kidney transplant recipients with BK polyomavirus replication-a retrospective study

In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) replication may progress to polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy (PVAN). In this retrospective study, we assessed the chemokine CXCL10 in urine and blood samples consecutively acquired from 85 KTRs who displayed different stages of BKPyV replication and eventually developed PVAN. In parallel to progression toward PVAN, CXCL10 gradually increased in blood and urine, from baseline (prior to virus replication) to BKPyV DNAuria (median increase in blood: 42.15 pg/ml, P = 0.0156), from mere DNAuria to low‐ and high‐level BKPyV DNAemia (median increase: 52.60 and 87.26 pg/ml, P = 0.0010 and P = 0.0002, respectively) and peaked with histologically confirmed PVAN (median increase: 145.00 pg/ml, P < 0.0001). CXCL10 blood and urine levels significantly differed among KTRs with respect to simultaneous presence of human cytomegalovirus (P < 0.001) as well as in relation to the clinical severity of respective BKPyV DNAemia episodes (P = 0.0195). CXCL‐10 concentrations were particularly lower in KTRs in whom BKPyV DNAemia remained without clinical evidence for PVAN, as compared to individuals who displayed high decoy cell levels, decreased renal function and/or biopsy‐proven PVAN (median blood concentration: 266.97 vs. 426.42 pg/ml, P = 0.0282). In conclusion, in KTRs CXCL10 rises in parallel to BKPyV replication and correlates with the gradual development of PVAN.

Technical Considerations and Confounders for Urine CXCL10 Chemokine Measurement

Background.

The urine C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10) is a promising screening biomarker for renal allograft rejection. The aim of the study was to investigate important technical and biological aspects as well as potential confounders when measuring urine CXCL10.

Methods.

We analyzed 595 urine samples from 117 patients, who participated in a randomized controlled trial investigating the clinical utility of urine CXCL10 monitoring for posttransplant management. Urine CXCL10 was measured by an immunoassay using electrochemiluminescence.

Results.

Intraassay coefficient of variation was 2.5%, and interassay coefficient of variation was 10%. Urine CXCL10 remained stable (ie, <10% degradation) for 8 hours at 25°C or 37°C and for 3 days at 4°C. CXCL10 concentrations [pg/mL] strongly correlated with urine CXCL10/creatinine ratios [ng/mmol] (r² = 0.98; P < 0.0001). Leucocyturia and active BK-polyomavirus infection are associated with higher CXCL10 concentrations, while allograft function, serum CRP, patient age, proteinuria, urine pH, hematuria, squamous epithelia cell count, and bacteriuria did not correlate with urine CXCL10 concentrations. In 145 paired samples obtained within 1–2 weeks, 80% showed a CXCL10/creatinine ratio change of < ±2 ng/mmol or ±50%, respectively.

Conclusions.

Urine CXCL10 measurement on the used platform is accurate and robust. Leucocyturia and active BK-polyomavirus infection are major confounders, which can be easily detected but represent important diagnostic “blind spots” when using urine CXCL10 to screen for allograft rejection. The intraindividual biological variability of urine CXCL10 within 1–2 weeks is mostly below ±50%, which is still much higher than the technical variability due to sample handling/processing (<20%).

Non-invasive differentiation of non-rejection kidney injury from acute rejection in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major concern in pediatric kidney transplant recipients, where non-alloimmune causes must be distinguished from rejection. We sought to identify a urinary metabolite signature associated with non-rejection kidney injury (NRKI) in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Urine samples (n = 396) from 60 pediatric transplant participants were obtained at time of kidney biopsy and quantitatively assayed for 133 metabolites by mass spectrometry. Metabolite profiles were analyzed via projection on latent structures discriminant analysis. Mixed-effects regression identified laboratory and clinical predictors of NRKI and distinguished NRKI from T cell-mediated rejection (CMR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and mixed CMR/AMR. Urine samples (n = 199) without rejection were split into NRKI (n = 26; ΔSCr ≥25%), pre-NRKI (n = 35; ΔSCr ≥10% and <25%), and no NRKI (n = 138; ΔSCr <10%) groups. The NRKI discriminant score (dscore) distinguished between NRKI and no NRKI (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.79-0.94), confirmed by leave-one-out cross-validation (AUC = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.68-0.89). The NRKI dscore also distinguished between NRKI and pre-NRKI (AUC = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.71-0.93). In a linear mixed-effects regression model to account for repeated measures, the NRKI dscore was independent of concurrent rejection, but there was a non-statistical trend for higher dscores with rejection severity. A second exploratory classifier developed to distinguish NRKI from clinical rejection had similar test characteristics (AUC = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.70-0.92, confirmed by LOOCV). This study demonstrates the potential of a urine metabolite classifier to detect NRKI in pediatric kidney transplant patients and non-invasively discriminate NRKI from rejection.

Multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol of urine CXCL10 monitoring strategy in kidney transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Subclinical inflammation is an important predictor of death-censored graft loss, and its treatment has been shown to improve graft outcomes. Urine CXCL10 outperforms standard post-transplant surveillance in observational studies, by detecting subclinical rejection and early clinical rejection before graft functional decline in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a phase ii/iii multicentre, international randomised controlled parallel group trial to determine if the early treatment of rejection, as detected by urine CXCL10, will improve kidney allograft outcomes. Incident adult kidney transplant patients (n~420) will be enrolled to undergo routine urine CXCL10 monitoring postkidney transplant. Patients at high risk of rejection, defined as confirmed elevated urine CXCL10 level, will be randomised 1:1 stratified by centre (n=250). The intervention arm (n=125) will undergo a study biopsy to check for subclinical rejection and biopsy-proven rejection will be treated per protocol. The control arm (n=125) will undergo routine post-transplant monitoring. The primary outcome at 12 months is a composite of death-censored graft loss, clinical biopsy-proven acute rejection, de novo donor-specific antibody, inflammation in areas of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (Banff i-IFTA, chronic active T-cell mediated rejection) and subclinical tubulitis on 12-month surveillance biopsy. The secondary outcomes include decline of graft function, microvascular inflammation at 12 months, development of IFTA at 12 months, days from transplantation to clinical biopsy-proven rejection, albuminuria, EuroQol five-dimension five-level instrument, cost-effectiveness analysis of the urine CXCL10 monitoring strategy and the urine CXCL10 kinetics in response to rejection therapy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board (HS20861, B2017:076) and the local research ethics boards of participating centres. Recruitment commenced in March 2018 and results are expected to be published in 2023. De-identified data may be shared with other researchers according to international guidelines (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [ICJME]).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03206801; Pre-results.

Urinary CXCL10 Chemokine Is Associated With Alloimmune and Virus Compartment-Specific Renal Allograft Inflammation

BACKGROUND

Urinary CXC chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) is a promising biomarker for subclinical tubulointerstitial inflammation, but limited data exist regarding its correlation with (micro)vascular inflammation. Furthermore, no study has evaluated whether concomitant serum CXCL10 improves the discrimination for (micro)vascular inflammation.

METHODS

We investigated whether serum/urinary CXCL10 reflect subclinical inflammation within different renal compartments. Patients (n = 107) with 107 surveillance biopsies were classified as: normal histology (n = 47), normal histology with polyomavirus BK (BKV) or cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia (n = 17), moderate-severe tubulointerstitial inflammation (tubulitis ≥2, n = 18), pure microvascular inflammation (n = 15), and isolated v lesions (n = 10). Serum and urinary CXCL10 Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay was performed. An independent validation set was evaluated for urine CXCL10: normal histology (n = 14), normal histology with BKV or CMV viremia (n = 19), tubulitis ≥2 (n = 15), pure microvascular inflammation (n = 41), and isolated v lesions (n = 14).

RESULTS

Elevated urinary CXCL10 reflected inflammation within the tubulointerstitial (urinary CXCL10/creatinine, 1.23 ng/mmol vs 0.46 ng/mmol; P = 0.02; area under the curve, 0.69; P = 0.001) and microvascular compartments (urinary CXCL10/creatinine, 1.72 ng/mmol vs 0.46 ng/mmol; P = 0.03; area under the curve, 0.69; P = 0.02) compared to normal histology. Intriguingly, urinary CXCL10 was predominantly elevated with peritubular capillaritis, but not glomerulitis (P = 0.04). Furthermore, urinary CXCL10 corresponded with BKV, but not CMV viremia (P = 0.02). These urine CXCL10 findings were confirmed in the independent validation set. Finally, serum CXCL10 was elevated with BKV and CMV viremia but was not associated with microvascular or vascular inflammation (P ≥ 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary CXCL10 reflects subclinical inflammation within the tubulointerstitial and peritubular capillary spaces, but not the vascular/systemic compartments; this was consistent with BKV (tubulointerstitial) and CMV viremia (systemic). Serum CXCL10 was not a useful marker for (micro)vascular inflammation.

The prognostic value of urinary chemokines at 6 months after pediatric kidney transplantation

Pediatric kidney transplantation is lifesaving, but long-term allograft survival is still limited by injury processes mediated by alloimmune inflammation that may otherwise be clinically silent. Chemokines associated with alloimmune inflammation may offer prognostic value early post-transplant by identifying patients at increased risk of poor graft outcomes. We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study of consecutive pediatric kidney transplant recipients (<19 years). Urinary CCL2 and CXCL10 measured at 6 months post-transplant were evaluated for association with long-term eGFR decline, allograft survival, and concomitant acute cellular rejection histology. Thirty-eight patients with a mean age of 12.4 ± 4.6 years were evaluated. Urinary CCL2 was associated with eGFR decline until 6 months (ρ -0.43; P < .01), but not at later time points. Urinary CXCL10 was associated with eGFR decline at 36 months (ρ -0.49; P < .01), risk of 50% eGFR decline (HR = 1.04; P = .02), risk of allograft loss (HR = 1.05; P = .01), borderline rejection or rejection episodes 6-12 months post-transplant (r .41; P = .02), and Banff i + t score (r .47, P < .01). CCL2 and CXCL10 were also correlated with one another (ρ 0.54; P < .01). CCL2 and CXCL10 provide differing, but complementary, information that may be useful for early non-invasive prognostic testing in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

Evolution of renal function and urinary biomarker indicators of inflammation on serial kidney biopsies in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with and without rejection

Urinary CXCL10 and metabolites are biomarkers independently associated with TCMR. We sought to test whether these biomarkers fluctuate in association with histological severity of TCMR over short time frames. Forty-nine pairs of renal biopsies obtained 1-3 months apart from 40 pediatric renal transplant recipients were each scored for TCMR acuity score (i + t; Banff criteria). Urinary CXCL10:Cr and TCMR MDS were obtained at each biopsy and were tested for association with changes between biopsies in acuity, estimated GFR (ΔeGFR), and 12-month ΔeGFR. Sequential biopsies were obtained 1.8 ± 0.8 months apart. Biopsy 1 was usually obtained under protocol (75%), and 62% percent had evidence of TCMR. Using each biopsy pair for comparison, ΔeGFR did not predict change in acuity. By contrast, change in acuity was significantly correlated with change in urinary CXCL10:Cr (ρ 0.45, P = .003) and MDS (ρ 0.29, P = .04) between biopsies. The 12-month ΔeGFR was not predicted by TCMR acuity or CXCL10:Cr at Biopsy 2; however, an inverse correlation was seen with urinary MDS (ρ -0.35; P = .02). Changes in eGFR correlate poorly with evolving TCMR acuity on histology. Urinary biomarkers may be superior for non-invasive monitoring of rejection, including histological response to therapy, and may be prognostic for medium-term function.

Novel non-invasive biomarkers diagnostic of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Acute rejection is a significant complication detrimental to kidney transplant function. Current accepted means of diagnosis is percutaneous renal biopsy, a costly and invasive procedure. There is an urgent need to detect and validate non-invasive biomarkers capable of replacing the biopsy.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Comprehensive literature searches of Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were performed. Eligible studies were included as per inclusion criteria and assessed for quality using the GRADE quality of evidence tool. Outcomes evaluated included biomarker diagnostic performance, number of patients/samples, mean age and gender ratio, immunosuppression regime, in addition to clinical applications of the biomarker(s) tested. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Where possible, statistical analysis of comparative performance data was performed.

RESULTS

23 studies were included in this review, including 19 adult, 3 paediatric and 1 mixed studies. A total of 2858 participants and 50 candidate non-invasive tests were identified. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve performance values ranged 36%-100%, 30%-100% and 0.55-0.98, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although larger, more robust multi-centre validation studies are needed before non-invasive biomarkers can replace the biopsy, numerous candidate tests have demonstrated significant promise for various facets of postoperative management. Suggested uses include: ruling out patients with a low risk of acute rejection to avoid the need for biopsy, non-invasive testing where the biopsy is contraindicated and a prompt diagnosis is needed, and integration into a serial blood monitoring protocol in conjunction with serum creatinine.

Carpe diem-Time to transition from empiric to precision medicine in kidney transplantation

The current immunosuppressive pipeline in kidney transplantation is limited. In part, this is due to excellent one-year allograft outcomes with the current standard of care (ie, calcineurin inhibitor in combination with anti-proliferative agents). Despite this success, a recent Federal government-sponsored systematic review has identified gaps/limits in the evidence of what constitutes optimal calcineurin inhibitor use in the short- and long-term. Moreover, recent empiric approaches to minimize/withdraw/convert from calcineurin inhibitors have come with the price of increased alloreactivity. As the time horizon to replace calcineurin inhibitors on a global scale may be distant, the transplant community should seize the opportunity to develop ways to personalize calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression to the individual-transitioning from empiricism to precision. The authors argue in this viewpoint that the path to precision will require measures capable of detecting subclinical alloreactivity to define adequacy of immunosuppression, as well as novel genetic analytics to accurately define alloimmune risk at the individual level-both approaches will require validation in clinical trials.

Biomarkers to detect rejection after kidney transplantation

Detecting acute rejection in kidney transplantation has been traditionally done using histological analysis of invasive allograft biopsies, but this method carries a risk and is not perfect. Transplant professionals have been working to develop more accurate or less invasive biomarkers that can predict acute rejection or subsequent worse allograft survival. These biomarkers can use tissue, blood or urine as a source. They can comprise individual molecules or panels, singly or in combination, across different components or pathways of the immune system. This review highlights the most recent evidence for biomarker efficacy, especially from multicenter trials.

New developments in transplant proteomics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite modern immunosuppression, renal allograft rejection remains a major contributor to graft loss. Novel biomarkers may help improve posttransplant outcomes through the early detection and treatment of rejection. Our objective is to provide an overview of proteomics, review recent discovery-based rejection studies, and explore innovative approaches in biomarker development.

RECENT FINDINGS

Urine MMP7 was identified as a biomarker of subclinical and clinical rejection using two-dimensional liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and improved the overall diagnostic discrimination of urine CXCL10 : Cr alone for renal allograft inflammation. A novel peptide signature to classify stable allografts from acute rejection, chronic allograft injury, and polyoma virus (BKV) nephropathy was identified using isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (TRAQ) and label-free MS, with independent validation by selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (SRM-MS). Finally, an in-depth exploration of peripheral blood mononuclear cells identified differential proteoform expression in healthy transplants versus rejection.

SUMMARY

There is still much in the human proteome that remains to be explored, and further integration of renal, urinary, and exosomal data may offer deeper insight into the pathophysiology of rejection. Functional proteomics may be more biologically relevant than protein/peptide quantity alone, such as assessment of proteoforms or activity-based protein profiling. Discovery-based studies have identified potential biomarker candidates, but external validation studies are required.

Practice Patterns in the Treatment and Monitoring of Acute T Cell-Mediated Kidney Graft Rejection in Canada

Background

One of the goals of the Canadian National Transplant Research Program (CNTRP) is to develop novel therapies for acute rejection that could positively affect graft outcomes with greater efficacy or less toxicity. To develop innovative management strategies for kidney graft rejection, new modalities need to be compared with current clinical practices. However, there are no standardized practices concerning the management of acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR).

Objectives

To describe clinicians' practice patterns in the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of acute TCMR in Canada.

Design

Survey.

Setting Patients/Participants

Canadian transplant nephrologists and transplant surgeons involved in the management of acute TCMR.

Methods and Measurements

We developed an anonymous, web-based survey consisting of questions related to the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of TCMR. The survey was disseminated on 3 occasions between June and October 2016 through the Canadian Society of Transplantation (CST) kidney group electronic mailing list.

Results

Forty-seven respondents, mostly transplant nephrologists (97%), originating from at least 18 of the 25 Canadian centers offering adult or pediatric kidney transplantation, participated in the study. Surveillance biopsies were used by 28% of respondents to screen for kidney graft rejection. High-dose steroids were used by most of the respondents to treat clinical and subclinical Banff grade 1A and 1B rejections. Nine percent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1-17) of practitioners used lymphocyte-depleting agents as the first-line approach for the treatment of Banff grade 1B acute rejection. Eighteen percent (95% CI: 7-29) and 36% (95% CI: 8-65) of respondents reported that they would not use high-dose steroids for treating clinical and subclinical borderline rejections, respectively. Seventy percent (95% CI: 54-83) of respondents answered that there was no indication to assess histological response to treatment independent of the change in kidney function.

Limitations

The limitations of this study are its limited sample size and the low representation of pediatric specialists.

Conclusions

There is heterogeneity regarding the use of surveillance biopsies, treatment of borderline rejection, and modalities to monitor treatment response among transplant physicians. Our results illustrate the current state of practice patterns across Canada and can be used to inform the design of future trials.

Defining the phenotype of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: Advances in diagnosis of antibody injury

The diagnostic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) are constantly evolving in light of the evidence. Inclusion of C4d-negative ABMR has been one of the major advances in the Banff Classification in recent years. Currently Banff 2015 classification requires evidence of donor specific antibodies (DSA), interaction between DSA and the endothelium, and acute tissue injury (in the form of microvasculature injury (MVI); acute thrombotic microangiopathy; or acute tubular injury in the absence of other apparent cause). In this article we review not only the ABMR phenotypes acknowledged in the most recent Banff classification, but also the phenotypes related to novel pathogenic antibodies (non-HLA DSA, antibody isoforms and subclasses, complement-binding functionality) and molecular diagnostic tools (gene transcripts, metabolites, small proteins, cytokines, and donor-derived cell-free DNA). These novel tools are also being considered for the prognosis and monitoring of treatment response. We propose that improved classification of ABMR based on underlying pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes will be an important step in identifying patient-centered therapies to extend graft survival.

Establishing Biomarkers in Transplant Medicine: A Critical Review of Current Approaches

Although the management of kidney transplant recipients has greatly improved over recent decades, the assessment of individual risks remains highly imperfect. Individualized strategies are necessary to recognize and prevent immune complications early and to fine-tune immunosuppression, with the overall goal to improve patient and graft outcomes. This review discusses current biomarkers and their limitations, and recent advancements in the field of noninvasive biomarker discovery. A wealth of noninvasive monitoring tools has been suggested that use easily accessible biological fluids such as urine and blood, allowing frequent and sequential assessments of recipient's immune status. This includes functional cell-based assays and the evaluation of molecular expression on a wide spectrum of platforms. Nevertheless, the translation and validation of exploratory findings and their implementation into standard clinical practice remain challenging. This requires dedicated prospective interventional trials demonstrating that the use of these biomarkers avoids invasive procedures and improves patient or transplant outcomes.

Six-Month Urinary CCL2 and CXCL10 Levels Predict Long-term Renal Allograft Outcome

BACKGROUND

Early prognostic markers that identify high-risk patients could lead to increased surveillance, personalized immunosuppression, and improved long-term outcomes. The goal of this study was to validate 6-month urinary chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) as a noninvasive predictor of long-term outcomes and compare it with 6-month urinary CXCL10.

METHODS

A prospective, observational renal transplant cohort (n = 185; minimum, 5-year follow-up) was evaluated. The primary composite outcome included 1 or more: allograft loss, renal function decline (>20% decrease estimated glomerular filtration rate between 6 months and last follow-up), and biopsy-proven rejection after 6 months. CCL2/CXCL10 are reported in relation to urine creatinine (ng/mmol).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (52/185, 28%) reached the primary outcome at a median 6.0 years, and their urinary CCL2:Cr was significantly higher compared with patients with stable allograft function (median [interquartile range], 38.6 ng/mmol [19.7-72.5] vs 25.9 ng/mmol [16.1-45.8], P = 0.009). Low urinary CCL2:Cr (≤70.0 ng/mmol) was associated with 88% 5-year event-free survival compared with 50% with high urinary CCL2:Cr (P < 0.0001). In a multivariate Cox-regression model, the only independent predictors of the primary outcome were high CCL2:Cr (hazard ratio [HR], 2.86; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.33-5.73) and CXCL10:Cr (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.23-4.88; both P = 0.009). Urinary CCL2:Cr/CXCL10:Cr area under the curves were 0.62 (P = 0.001)/0.63 (P = 0.03), respectively. Time-to-endpoint analysis according to combined high or low urinary chemokines demonstrates that endpoint-free survival depends on the overall early chemokine burden.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that urinary CCL2:Cr is an independent predictor of long-term allograft outcomes. Urinary CCL2:Cr/CXCL10:Cr alone have similar prognostic performance, but when both are elevated, this suggests a worse prognosis. Therefore, urinary chemokines may be a useful tool for timely identification of high-risk patients.

Changing Paradigms in the Management of Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: Evolving From Protocol-Based Care to the Era of P4 Medicine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

P4 medicine denotes an evolving field of medicine encompassing predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory medicine. Using the example of kidney allograft rejection because of donor-recipient incompatibility in human leukocyte antigens, this review outlines P4 medicine's relevance to the various stages of the kidney transplant cycle.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

A search for English articles was conducted in Medline via OvidSP (up to August 18, 2016) using a combination of subject headings (MeSH) and free text in titles, abstracts, and author keywords for the concepts kidney transplantation and P4 medicine. The electronic database search was expanded further on particular subject headings.

FINDINGS

Available histocompatibility methods exemplify current applications of the predictive and preventive domains of P4 medicine in kidney transplant recipients' care. Pharmacogenomics are discussed as means to facilitate personalized immunosuppression regimens and promotion of active patient participation as a means to improve adherence.

LIMITATIONS

For simplicity, this review focuses on rejection. P4 medicine, however, should more broadly address health concerns in kidney transplant recipients, including competing outcomes such as infections, malignancies, and cardiovascular disease. This review highlights how biomarkers to evaluate these competing outcomes warrant validation and standardization prior to their incorporation into clinical practice.

IMPLICATIONS

Consideration of all 4 domains of the P4 medicine framework when caring for and/or studying kidney transplant recipients has the potential of increasing therapeutic efficiency, minimizing adverse effects, decreasing health care costs, and maximizing wellness. Technologies to gauge immune competency, immunosuppression requirements, and early/reversible immune-mediated injuries are required to optimize kidney transplant care.

Barcelona Consensus on Biomarker-Based Immunosuppressive Drugs Management in Solid Organ Transplantation

With current treatment regimens, a relatively high proportion of transplant recipients experience underimmunosuppression or overimmunosuppression. Recently, several promising biomarkers have been identified for determining patient alloreactivity, which help in assessing the risk of rejection and personal response to the drug; others correlate with graft dysfunction and clinical outcome, offering a realistic opportunity for personalized immunosuppression. This consensus document aims to help tailor immunosuppression to the needs of the individual patient. It examines current knowledge on biomarkers associated with patient risk stratification and immunosuppression requirements that have been generally accepted as promising. It is based on a comprehensive review of the literature and the expert opinion of the Biomarker Working Group of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. The quality of evidence was systematically weighted, and the strength of recommendations was rated according to the GRADE system. Three types of biomarkers are discussed: (1) those associated with the risk of rejection (alloreactivity/tolerance), (2) those reflecting individual response to immunosuppressants, and (3) those associated with graft dysfunction. Analytical aspects of biomarker measurement and novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models accessible to the transplant community are also addressed. Conventional pharmacokinetic biomarkers may be used in combination with those discussed in this article to achieve better outcomes and improve long-term graft survival. Our group of experts has made recommendations for the most appropriate analysis of a proposed panel of preliminary biomarkers, most of which are currently under clinical evaluation in ongoing multicentre clinical trials. A section of Next Steps was also included, in which the Expert Committee is committed to sharing this knowledge with the Transplant Community in the form of triennial updates.

Biomarkers in Transplantation--Proteomics and Metabolomics

Modern multianalyte "omics" technologies allow for the identification of molecular signatures that confer significantly more information than measurement of a single parameter as typically used in current medical diagnostics. Proteomics and metabolomics bioanalytical assays capture a large set of proteins and metabolites in body fluids, cells, or tissues and, complementing genomics, assess the phenome. Proteomics and metabolomics contribute to the development of novel predictive clinical biomarkers in transplantation in 2 ways: they can be used to generate a diagnostic fingerprint or they can be used to discover individual proteins and metabolites of diagnostic potential. Much fewer metabolomics than proteomics biomarker studies in transplant patients have been reported, and, in contrast to proteomics discovery studies, new lead metabolite markers have yet to emerge. Most clinical proteomics studies have been discovery studies. Several of these studies have assessed diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, none of these newly discovered protein biomarkers have yet been implemented in clinical decision making in transplantation. The currently most advanced markers discovered in proteomics studies in transplant patients are the chemokines CXCL-9 and CXCL-10, which have successfully been validated in larger multicenter trials in kidney transplant patients. These chemokines can be measured using standard immunoassay platforms, which should facilitate clinical implementation. Based on the published evidence, it is reasonable to expect that these chemokine markers can help guiding and individualizing immunosuppressive regimens, may be able to predict acute and chronic T-cell-mediated and antibody-mediated rejection, and may be useful tools for risk stratification of kidney transplant patients.

Analytical Aspects of the Implementation of Biomarkers in Clinical Transplantation

In response to the urgent need for new reliable biomarkers to complement the guidance of the immunosuppressive therapy, a huge number of biomarker candidates to be implemented in clinical practice have been introduced to the transplant community. This includes a diverse range of molecules with very different molecular weights, chemical and physical properties, ex vivo stabilities, in vivo kinetic behaviors, and levels of similarity to other molecules, etc. In addition, a large body of different analytical techniques and assay protocols can be used to measure biomarkers. Sometimes, a complex software-based data evaluation is a prerequisite for appropriate interpretation of the results and for their reporting. Although some analytical procedures are of great value for research purposes, they may be too complex for implementation in a clinical setting. Whereas the proof of "fitness for purpose" is appropriate for validation of biomarker assays used in exploratory drug development studies, a higher level of analytical validation must be achieved and eventually advanced analytical performance might be necessary before diagnostic application in transplantation medicine. A high level of consistency of results between laboratories and between methods (if applicable) should be obtained and maintained to make biomarkers effective instruments in support of therapeutic decisions. This overview focuses on preanalytical and analytical aspects to be considered for the implementation of new biomarkers for adjusting immunosuppression in a clinical setting and highlights critical points to be addressed on the way to make them suitable as diagnostic tools. These include but are not limited to appropriate method validation, standardization, education, automation, and commercialization.

Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients, part II: omics analyses of urine and blood samples

Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, the full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated with a significant risk of complications and is limited by sampling error and interobserver variability. In the present review, we summarize the current literature about non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of AR in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including in vivo imaging, gene-expression profiling and omics analyses of blood and urine samples. Most imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance, exploit the fact that blood flow is significantly lowered in case of AR-induced inflammation. In addition, AR-associated recruitment of activated leucocytes may be detectable by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. In parallel, urine biomarkers, including CXCL9/CXCL10 or a three-gene signature of CD3ε, CXCL10 and 18S RNA levels, have been identified. None of these approaches has yet been adopted in the clinical follow-up of KTRs, but standardization of analysis procedures may help assess reproducibility and comparative diagnostic yield in large, prospective, multicentre trials.

Early Low Urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 Might Predict Immunological Quiescence in Clinically and Histologically Stable Kidney Recipients

We monitored the urinary C-X-C motif chemokine (CXCL)9 and CXCL10 levels in 1722 urine samples from 300 consecutive kidney recipients collected during the first posttransplantation year and assessed their predictive value for subsequent acute rejection (AR). The trajectories of urinary CXCL10 showed an early increase at 1 month (p = 0.0005) and 3 months (p = 0.0009) in patients who subsequently developed AR. At 1 year, the AR-free allograft survival rates were 90% and 54% in patients with CXCL10:creatinine (CXCL10:Cr) levels <2.79 ng/mmoL and >2.79 ng/mmoL at 1 month, respectively (p < 0.0001), and 88% and 56% in patients with CXCL10:Cr levels <5.32 ng/mmoL and >5.32 ng/mmoL at 3 months (p < 0.0001), respectively. CXCL9:Cr levels also associate, albeit less robustly, with AR-free allograft survival. Early CXCL10:Cr levels predicted clinical and subclinical rejection and both T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection. In 222 stable patients, CXCL10:Cr at 3 months predicted AR independent of concomitant protocol biopsy results (p = 0.009). Although its positive predictive value was low, a high negative predictive value suggests that early CXCL10:Cr might predict immunological quiescence on a triple-drug calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimen in the first posttransplantation year, even in clinically and histologically stable patients. The clinical utility of this test will need to be addressed by dedicated prospective clinical trials.

Detecting Renal Allograft Inflammation Using Quantitative Urine Metabolomics and CXCL10

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to characterize urinary metabolomics for the noninvasive detection of cellular inflammation and to determine if adding urinary chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) improves the overall diagnostic discrimination.

METHODS

Urines (n = 137) were obtained before biopsy in 113 patients with no (n = 66), mild (borderline or subclinical; n = 58), or severe (clinical; n = 13) rejection from a prospective cohort of adult renal transplant patients (n = 113). Targeted, quantitative metabolomics was performed with direct flow injection tandem mass spectrometry using multiple reaction monitoring (ABI 4000 Q-Trap). Urine CXCL10 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A projection on latent structures discriminant analysis was performed and validated using leave-one-out cross-validation, and an optimal 2-component model developed. Chemokine ligand 10 area under the curve (AUC) was determined and net reclassification index and integrated discrimination index analyses were performed.

RESULTS

PLS2 demonstrated that urinary metabolites moderately discriminated the 3 groups (Cohen κ, 0.601; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.46-0.74; P < 0.001). Using binary classifiers, urinary metabolites and CXCL10 demonstrated an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.68-0.84), respectively, and a combined AUC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78-0.91) for detecting alloimmune inflammation that was improved by net reclassification index and integrated discrimination index analyses. Urinary CXCL10 was the best univariate discriminator, followed by acylcarnitines and hexose.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary metabolomics can noninvasively discriminate noninflamed renal allografts from those with subclinical and clinical inflammation, and the addition of urine CXCL10 had a modest but significant effect on overall diagnostic performance. These data suggest that urinary metabolomics and CXCL10 may be useful for noninvasive monitoring of alloimmune inflammation in renal transplant patients.