Calcineurin Inhibitor Free De Novo Immunosuppression in Liver Transplant Recipients With Pretransplant Renal Impairment: Results of a Pilot Study (PATRON07)

Late-onset Chronic Kidney Disease Over 2 Decades After Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Single-center, Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) after liver transplantation (LTx) is a common complication in adults, its long-term significance after pediatric LTx remains unclear. We examined the decades-long transition of renal function and revealed the risk factors for late-onset CKD after pediatric LTx in a single-center retrospective cohort of 117 pediatric LTx recipients who survived >5 y.

METHODS

The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and CKD stages were calculated using serum creatinine. Risk factor analysis for late-onset CKD was performed in 41 patients whose eGFR could be evaluated at >20 y after LTx.

RESULTS

The median age at LTx was 1.3 y, and most primary diagnoses were biliary atresia (77%). The mean pre-LTx and 1, 5, 10, 20, and >20 y post-LTx eGFRs were 180, 135, 131, 121, 106, and 95 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , respectively, with a median renal follow-up period of 15 y. The eGFR declined by 47% at >20 y after LTx ( P  < 0.001). CKD was observed in 8%, 19%, and 39% of cases at 10, 20, and >20 y after LTx, respectively. In patients receiving cyclosporine, trough levels were 1.5 times higher in those with CKD up to 10 y after LTx. The multivariate analysis showed that older age at LTx (odds ratio, 1.3 by 1 y; P  = 0.008) and episodes of repeated/refractory rejection (odds ratio, 16.2; P  = 0.002) were independent risk factors of CKD >20 y after LTx.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, renal function deteriorates slowly yet steadily after pediatric LTx. Long-term careful surveillance is essential after pediatric LTx, especially in repeated/refractory rejection or long-term high trough-level use of cyclosporine cases.

[Update: Immunosuppression in organ transplantation]

Immunosuppression is an essential prerequisite for successful transplantation. In order to reduce the sometimes-considerable side effects, combination therapies with different agents are used. This article aims to provide an up-to-date overview of immunosuppression after liver and kidney transplantation.

Immunosuppression in patients with Grade 3 Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure at transplantation: A practice analysis study

Transplantation for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3 (ACLF3) has encouraging results with one-year-survival of 80-90%. These patients with multiple organ failure meet the conditions for serious alterations of drug metabolism and increased toxicity. The goal of this study was to identify immunosuppression-dependent factors that affect survival. This retrospective monocentric study was conducted in patients with ACLF3 consecutively transplanted between 2007 and 2019. The primary endpoint was one-year survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, treated rejection and surgical complications. Immunosuppression was evaluated as to type of immunosuppression, post-transplant introduction timing, through levels and trough level intra-patient variability (IPV). One hundred patients were included. Tacrolimus IPV <40% (p=0.019), absence of early tacrolimus overdose (p=0.033), use of anti-IL2-receptor antibodies (p=0.034) and early mycophenolic acid introduction (p=0.038) predicted one-year survival. Treated rejection was an independent predictor of survival (p=0.001; HR 4.2 (CI 95%: 1.13-15.6)). Early everolimus introduction was neither associated with higher rejection rates nor with more surgical complications. Management of immunosuppression in ACLF3 critically ill patients undergoing liver transplantation is challenging. Occurrence and treatment of rejection impacts on survival. Early introduction of mTOR inhibitor seems safe and efficient in this situation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Efficacy and safety of basiliximab as initial immunosuppression in liver transplantation: A single center study

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

The interleukin-2 receptor antagonist; basiliximab is used to allow delayed introduction of Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) after liver transplantation and thus delay their renal insult. However, there is only little evidence for the safety and the efficacy of this regimen. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of basiliximab induction in liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 89 patients who were classified into two groups: standard triple immunosuppression (IS) regimen of steroid, tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 47) and induction IS regimen of basiliximab, low dose steroids and MMF with delayed introduction of CNI (n = 42). All patients were followed after liver transplantation for at least six months or until death.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient survival, graft dysfunction, infection rate or type, or wound healing between both groups. The acute rejection rate was equivalent in both groups. Renal dysfunction in the first six months post-transplant was less in the basiliximab group in comparison to the other group (7.1% and 19.1% respectively).

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab-induced IS protocol is a safe regimen that reduces medium-term renal dysfunction and achieves similar survival without increasing the acute rejection or infection rate in liver transplantation recipients.

Update: Immunsuppression bei Organtransplantationen

Die Immunsuppression ist eine wesentliche Grundvoraussetzung für eine erfolgreiche Transplantation. Zur Reduktion der teils beträchtlichen Nebenwirkungen werden Kombinationstherapien mit unterschiedlichen Wirkstoffen durchgeführt. Dieser Beitrag soll einen aktuellen Überblick zur Immunsuppression nach Leber- und Nierentransplantation geben.

Acute and chronic kidney disease after pediatric liver transplantation: An underestimated problem

Acute and chronic kidney injuries represent critical issues after liver transplantation (LTx), but whereas renal dysfunction in adult transplant patients is well documented, little is known about its prevalence in childhood. It is a challenge to accurately evaluate renal function in patients with liver disease, due to several confounding factors. Creatinine-based equations estimating glomerular filtration rate, validated in nephropathic patients without hepatic issues, are frequently inaccurate in end-stage liver disease, underestimating the real impact of renal disease. Moreover, whereas renal issues observed within 1 year from LTx were often related to acute injuries, kidney damage observed after 5-7 years from LTx, is due to chronic, irreversible mechanisms. Most immunosuppression protocols are based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, but mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus could play significant roles, also in children. Early diagnosis and personalized treatment represent the bases of kidney disease management, in order to minimize its close relation with increased mortality. This review analyzed acute and chronic kidney damage after pediatric LTx, also discussing the impact of pre-existent renal disease. The main immunosuppressant strategies have been reviewed, highlighting their impact on kidney function. Different methods assessing renal function were reported, with the potential application of new renal biomarkers.

Peri-transplant renal dysfunction in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis undergoing liver transplantation

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the most common etiology of chronic liver disease (CLD) caused by an accumulation of fat in the liver and globally is the leading indication of liver transplantation. Emerging data has recognized an increased association of NAFLD with risk of other metabolic liver diseases like type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular diseases. Pathophysiologically, NAFLD patients have a state of low-grade systemic inflammation, insulin resistance and atherogenic dyslipidemia which causes renal dysfunction. Patients with NAFLD cirrhosis awaiting liver transplant (LT) face unique challenges and have a significantly higher requirement of simultaneous-liver-kidney transplant as compared to other etiologies. Further, NAFLD not only recurs but also occurs as a de novo manifestation post-LT. There is also a significantly higher risk of waiting list stagnation and dropouts due to burdensome cardiometabolic disorders in NAFLD patients. The current review aims to understand the prevalence and pathogenetic basis of renal dysfunction in NAFLD. Additionally, the review describes the choice of immunosuppression protocols and use of intraoperative renal replacement therapy in context of intra and post-operative renal dysfunction in NAFLD patients. Prospective controlled trials focusing on NAFLD and development of CKD are needed to assess the existence of a causal and/or a bidirectional relationship between NAFLD and CKD.

Long-Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in Patients With Pretransplant Renal Dysfunction Treated With Induction Therapy and Delayed Reduced De Novo Once-Daily Tacrolimus

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Renal dysfunction is related to short- and long-term survival after liver transplantation. We present herein a retrospective analysis of our experience with liver transplantation in recipients with pretransplant renal dysfunction treated with induction therapy followed by delayed/reduced de novo once-daily tacrolimus.

METHODS

Liver transplantations performed between April 2008 and August 2011 were included in this study. Pretransplant renal dysfunction was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min. Interleukin-2 receptor antagonists were used for induction therapy. Initial once-daily tacrolimus dose was 0.10 mg/kg/day or 0.07 mg/kg/day if combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Tacrolimus target trough levels were 4 to 6 ng/mL during the first post-transplant year and <4 ng/mL the rest of the follow-up.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients comprised the study cohort with a median follow-up of 56.4 months (range, 11-78). Median day of tacrolimus introduction was 7 (range, 3-12). Once-daily tacrolimus was withdrawn in 6 patients (31.6%) due to evolution of renal dysfunction in all cases. At 5 years, 30% of the patients were under MMF monotherapy. Mean tacrolimus trough levels were maintained under 5 ng/mL. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 5 years was 55.3 ± 12.7 mL/min. No patient needed hemodialysis or renal transplantation over the follow-up. Patient survival at 5 years was 78.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction therapy followed by delayed/reduced de novo once-daily tacrolimus and maintenance of low tacrolimus exposition during the follow-up is effective to maintain long-term renal function and to achieve favorable patient survival in liver transplant recipients with pretransplant renal dysfunction.

Randomized Sirolimus-based Early Calcineurin Inhibitor Reduction in Liver Transplantation: Impact on Renal Function

BACKGROUND

The long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

Five-year follow-up data were retrieved from the randomized controlled multicenter SiLVER trial. Standard CNI-based mammalian target of rapamycin-free immunosuppression (group A, n = 264) was compared with a 50% reduction of CNI and introduction of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor Sirolimus (SIR) within 4-6 weeks after LT (group B, n = 261).

RESULTS

Median MELD at LT was low with 10 (7-15) (group A) and 11 (8-15) (group B) in the intention-to-treat approach. CNI dose and CNI trough were reduced by 20% and 8% (group A) versus 55% and 56% (group B) at 3 months posttransplantation. Renal function was preserved at 3 months after LT in the SIR arm (estimated glomerular filtration rate 74 [57-95] versus 67 [55-85] mL/min/1.73m2 P = 0.004) but was similarly impaired thereafter compared with group A. The per protocol analysis identified LT recipients in group B with concomitant early CNI minimization and SIR treatment ≥ year 1 with significantly superior estimated glomerular filtration rate and lowest rate of chronic kidney disease (≥stage 3) from year 1 onwards until study end. Competing risk factors for renal disease (arterial hypertension, fat metabolism disorder, and hyperglycemia) were not associated with worse kidney function.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevention of CNI nephrotoxicity by SIR-based early CNI minimization protects renal function only short-term after LT in the intention-to-treat analysis of this low MELD cohort. Yet, selected LT recipients compliant with early CNI minimization and SIR maintenance achieved better long-term renal outcomes compared with real-world practice.

Everolimus vs Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination With Tacrolimus: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis in Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

No trial has investigated the long-term outcome of everolimus (EVR)-incorporating immunosuppression vs tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) after liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With a propensity score methodology, 178 recipients on TAC and MMF were compared to 178 patients on TAC and EVR.

RESULTS

At a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 45 (46.3) months, the probability of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, and death was 36.6% for MMF and 28.1% for EVR (P = .0891). Treated biopsy-proven acute rejection was numerically lower for EVR (3.3% vs 7.3%, P = .09), while adverse events (70.2% vs 58.9%, P = .02) and drug discontinuations (21.3% vs 11.8%, P = .01) were significantly higher with regard to hypercholesterolemia (P = .001), thrombocytopenia (P = .0062), and edema (P = .0107). Patients on MMF showed more hypertension (P = .0315), tremor (P = .0006), cytomegalovirus infection (P = .0165), and malignancies (P = .0175). EVR was associated with lesser deterioration in mean (SD) renal function at the latest follow-up (-2.2 (1.8) vs -5.1 (3.2) mL/min/1.73 m², t = 3.6, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of the combination of TAC and EVR is comparable to that of TAC and MMF. Drug discontinuations and adverse events were higher for patients on EVR, but these latter showed less hypertension, cytomegalovirus infection, and renal dysfunction. The observed reduction in posttransplant malignancies for EVR requires longer follow-up to be confirmed.

Key role of renal biopsy in management of progressive chronic kidney disease in liver graft recipients

AIMS

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT). The etiology of CKD is broad and may only be assessed accurately by renal histology. The current study aimed to analyze the safety of renal biopsy in daily clinical practice as well as its usefulness regarding management of CKD after LT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data and renal biopsies obtained from patients with severe renal impairment (overt proteinuria, progressive deterioration of renal function) after LT with respect to safety, etiology of renal disease, and therapeutic consequences.

RESULTS

Renal biopsies were obtained from 14 patients at median (minimum-maximum) 3 (0.2-12) years after LT. No major complications associated with renal biopsy were observed. Histomorphological alterations were varied (nephrosclerosis, n = 5; IgA-glomerulonephritis, n = 4; tenofovir-associated nephropathy, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type 1, membranous glomerulonephritis, amyloid A amyloidosis, and calcineurin inhibitor nephropathy, n = 1, respectively). The diagnosis of specific renal diseases other than calcineurin-inhibitor nephrotoxicity facilitated specific treaments and avoided unnecessary modification of immunosuppression in the majority of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal biopsy in patients with CKD after LT seems safe and may offer specific therapeutic options. Furthermore, unnecessary changes of immunosuppression can be avoided in a considerable number of patients.

Modification of immunosuppressive therapy as risk factor for complications after liver transplantation

Management of complications post-liver transplantation (LT) includes immunosuppressive manipulations with the aim to reduce the overall burden of immunologic suppression and compensate for renal, cardiovascular, metabolic toxicities, and for the increased oncologic risk. Two approaches can be implemented to reduce immunosuppression-related adverse events: upfront schedules tailored to the pretransplant individual patient's risk profile versus downstream modifications in the event of immunosuppression-related complications. Upfront strategies are supported by evidence originating from prospective randomized trials and consist of triple/quadruple schedules whereby calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-exposure is reduced with combination of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies, antimetabolites and corticosteroids. Quadruple regimens allow for staggering of CNI introduction and higher renal function in the early term, but their superiority in the long term has not yet been established. A more recent upfront schedule contemplates early (4 weeks) introduction of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) everolimus and allows for reduction of CNI up to 4 years posttransplantation. Incorporation of mTORi has the potential to prolong time to recurrence for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, as suggested by the available evidence, downstream immunosuppressive manipulations are more frequently adopted in clinical practice. These encompass CNI replacement and immunosuppression withdrawal. Switching CNI to mTORi monotherapy is the option most commonly adopted to relieve renal function and compensate for posttransplant malignancies. Its impact is dependent on interval from transplantation and underlying severity of renal impairment. Introduction of mTORi is associated with longer overall survival for patients with extrahepatic posttransplant malignancies, but results are awaited for recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma. Immunosuppression withdrawal seems feasible (70%) in very long term survivors (>10 years), but is not associated with reversal of immunosuppression-related complications. Awaiting novel immunosuppressive drug categories, integration of upfront strategies with the aim to reduce CNI-exposure and a low threshold for adjustment in the posttransplant course are both advisable to improve long-term outcomes of LT.

Management of renal failure in end-stage liver disease: A critical appraisal

Renal failure is a late consequence of end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Even with liver transplantation, pretransplant renal impairment remains a strong predictor of posttransplant mortality. This review seeks to summarize and critically appraise common therapies used in this setting, including pharmacologic agents, procedures (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, renal replacement therapy), and simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. More experimental extracorporal modalities, eg, albumin dialysis or bioartificial livers, will not be discussed. A brief discussion on the definition and pathophysiologic underpinnings of renal failure in ESLD will be held at the beginning to lay the groundwork for the main section. Liver Transplantation 22 1710-1719 2016 AASLD.

Selection and use of immunosuppressive therapies after liver transplantation: current German practice

In recent years, immunosuppression (IS) after liver transplantation (LT) has become increasingly diversified as the choice of agents has expanded and clinicians seek to optimize the balance of immunosuppressive potency with the risk of adverse events in individual patients. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the primary agents used for patients undergoing liver transplantation. Other therapeutic agents like interleukin-2 receptor antagonists are not universally administered, but can be considered for the delay or reduction in CNI exposure. An early addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or the mTOR inhibitor everolimus also allows for the reduction in the CNI dose. To reduce the risk of malignancy, in particular of skin tumors, as well as to prevent the deterioration of renal function, everolimus-based therapy may be advantageous. Apart from patients with autoimmune hepatitis, steroids are withdrawn within 3-6 months after transplantation. Overall, immunosuppression can only be standardized in a limited proportion of patients due to specific clinical requirements and risk factors. Future studies should attempt to refine accurate individualization of the immunosuppressive regimen in specific difficult-to-treat patient subpopulations.

Challenging immunosuppression treatment in lung transplant recipients with kidney failure

Kidney failure after lung transplantation is a risk factor for chronic kidney disease. Calcineurin inhibitors are immunosuppressants which play a major role in terms of postoperative kidney failure after lung transplantation. We report our preliminary experience with the anti-interleukin-2 monoclonal antibody Basiliximab utilized as a "calcineurin inhibitor-free window" in the setting of early postoperative kidney failure after lung transplantation. Between 2012 and 2015 nine lung transplant patients who developed kidney failure for more than 14 days were included. Basiliximab was administrated in three doses (Day 0, 4, and 20) whilst Tacrolimus was discontinued or reduced to maintain a serum level between 2 and 4 ng/mL. Baseline glomerular filtration rate pre transplant was normal for all patients. Seven patients completely recovered from kidney failure (67%, mean eGFR pre and post Basiliximab: 42.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 69 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and were switched back on Tacrolimus. Only one of these patients still needs ongoing renal replacement therapy. Two patients showed no recovery from kidney failure and did not survive. Basiliximab might be a safe and feasible therapeutical option in patients which are affected by calcineurin inhibitor-related kidney failure in the early post lung transplant period. Further studies are necessary to confirm our preliminary results.