1
|
Abidi MZ, Schold JD, Kaplan B, Weinberg A, Erlandson KM, Malamon JS. Patient years lost due to cytomegalovirus serostatus mismatching in the scientific registry of transplant recipients. Front Immunol 2024; 14:1292648. [PMID: 38264645 PMCID: PMC10803440 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1292648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The cytomegalovirus (CMV) mismatch rate in deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients in the US remains above 40%. Since CMV mismatching is common in DDKT recipients, the cumulative effects may be significant in the context of overall patient and graft survival. Our primary objective was to describe the short- and long-term risks associated with high-risk CMV donor positive/recipient negative (D+/R-) mismatching among DDKT recipients with the explicit goal of deriving a mathematical mismatching penalty. Methods We conducted a retrospective, secondary analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database using donor-matched DDKT recipient pairs (N=105,608) transplanted between 2011-2022. All-cause mortality and graft failure hazard ratios were calculated from one year to ten years post-DDKT. All-cause graft failure included death events. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimation at 10 years post-DDKT and extrapolated to 20 years to provide the average graft days lost (aGDL) and average patient days lost (aPDL) due to CMV D+/R- serostatus mismatching. We also performed an age-based stratification analysis to compare the relative risk of CMV D+ mismatching by age. Results Among 31,518 CMV D+/R- recipients, at 1 year post-DDKT, the relative risk of death increased by 29% (p<0.001), and graft failure increased by 17% (p<0.001) as compared to matched CMV D+/R+ group (N=31,518). Age stratification demonstrated a significant increase in the risk associated with CMV mismatching in patients 40 years of age and greater. The aGDL per patient due to mismatching was 125 days and the aPDL per patient was 100 days. Conclusion The risks of CMV D+/R- mismatching are seen both at 1 year post-DDKT period and accumulated throughout the lifespan of the patient, with the average CMV D+/R- recipient losing more than three months of post-DDKT survival time. CMV D+/R- mismatching poses a more significant risk and a greater health burden than previously reported, thus obviating the need for better preventive strategies including CMV serodirected organ allocation to prolong lifespans and graft survival in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maheen Z. Abidi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Jesse D. Schold
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care (CCTCARE), Research and Education, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Bruce Kaplan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care (CCTCARE), Research and Education, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Adriana Weinberg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Pediatrics and Pathology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Kristine M. Erlandson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - John S. Malamon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care (CCTCARE), Research and Education, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Campos-Varela I, Blumberg EA, Giorgio P, Kotton CN, Saliba F, Wey EQ, Spiro M, Raptis DA, Villamil F. What is the optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent postoperative infectious complications after liver transplantation? A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14631. [PMID: 35257411 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial prophylaxis is well-accepted in the liver transplant (LT) setting. Nevertheless, optimal regimens to prevent bacterial, viral, and fungal infections are not defined. OBJECTIVES To identify the optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent post-LT bacterial, fungal, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, to improve short-term outcomes, and to provide international expert panel recommendations. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. PROSPERO ID CRD42021244976. RESULTS Of 1853 studies screened, 34 were included for this review. Bacterial, CMV, and fungal antimicrobial prophylaxis were evaluated separately. Pneumocystis jiroveccii pneumonia (PJP) antimicrobial prophylaxis was analyzed separately from other fungal infections. Overall, eight randomized controlled trials, 21 comparative studies, and five observational noncomparative studies were included. CONCLUSIONS Antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended to prevent bacterial, CMV, and fungal infection to improve outcomes after LT. Universal antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended to prevent postoperative bacterial infections. The choice of antibiotics should be individualized and length of therapy should not exceed 24 hours (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Both universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are strongly recommended for CMV prevention following LT. The choice of one or the other strategy will depend on individual program resources and experiences, as well as donor and recipient serostatus. (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Antifungal prophylaxis is strongly recommended for LT recipients at high risk of developing invasive fungal infections. The drug of choice remains controversial. (Quality of Evidence; High | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). PJP prophylaxis is strongly recommended. Length of prophylaxis remains controversial. (Quality of Evidence; Very Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Campos-Varela
- Liver Unit, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emily A Blumberg
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Patricia Giorgio
- Department of Infectious Disease, Hospital Británico, Buenos Aires City, Argentina
| | - Camille N Kotton
- Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Fauzi Saliba
- APHP, Hopital Paul Brousse, Université Paris Saclay, INSERM unit No. 1193, Villejuif, France
| | - Emmanuel Q Wey
- ILDH, Division of Medicine, University College London Medical School, London, UK.,Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Division of Infection & Immunity, UCL, London, UK.,Department of Infection, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Michael Spiro
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dimitri Aristotle Raptis
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Federico Villamil
- Liver Transplantation Unit, British Hospital, Buenos Aires City, Argentina.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Hospital El Cruce, Florencio Varela, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vutien P, Perkins J, Biggins SW, Reyes J, Imlay H, Limaye AP. Association of Donor and Recipient Cytomegalovirus Serostatus on Graft and Patient Survival in Liver Transplant Recipients. Liver Transpl 2021; 27:1302-1311. [PMID: 33687777 PMCID: PMC9121742 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Among solid organ transplant recipients, donor cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositive (D+) and recipient seronegative (R-) status are associated with an increased risk of graft loss and mortality after kidney or lung transplantation. Whether a similar relationship exists among liver transplant recipients (LTR) is unknown. We assessed graft loss and mortality among adult LTRs from January 1, 2010, to March 14, 2020, in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. We used multivariable mixed Cox proportional hazards regression to analyze the association of donor and recipient CMV serostatus group with graft loss and mortality, with donor seronegative (D-) and recipient seronegative (R-) as the reference group. Among 54,078 LTRs, the proportion of D-R-, D- and recipient seropositive (R+), D+R-, and D+R+ was 13.4%, 22.5%, 22%, and 42%, respectively. By unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curve estimates, survival by the end of follow-up was 73.3%, 73.5%, 70.1%, and 69.7%, among the D-R-, D-R+, D+R-, and D+R+ groups, respectively. By multivariable Cox regression, the CMV D+R- serogroup, but not other serogroups, was independently associated with increased risks of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.22) and mortality (aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.22). The magnitude of the association of the CMV D+R- serostatus group with mortality was similar when the Cox regression analysis was restricted to the first year after transplant and beyond the first year after transplant: aHR, 1.13 (95% CI, 1.01-1.27) and aHR, 1.13 (95% CI, 1.02-1.25), respectively. Even in an era of CMV preventive strategies, CMV D+R- serogroup status remains independently associated with increased graft loss and mortality in adult LTRs. Factors in addition to direct CMV-associated short-term mortality are likely, and studies to define the underlying mechanism(s) are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Vutien
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Liver Investigation Fostering discovEry (C-LIFE), University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - James Perkins
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Scott W. Biggins
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Liver Investigation Fostering discovEry (C-LIFE), University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jorge Reyes
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Hannah Imlay
- Division of Infectious Disease, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ajit P. Limaye
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Natori Y, Alghamdi A, Tazari M, Miller V, Husain S, Komatsu T, Griffiths P, Ljungman P, Orchanian-Cheff A, Kumar D, Humar A, Alexander B, Avery R, Baldanti F, Barnett S, Baum P, Berrey MM, Birnkrant D, Blumberg E, Boeckh M, Boutolleau D, Bowlin T, Brooks J, Chemaly R, Chou S, Cloherty G, Cruikshank W, Dropulic L, Einsele H, Erdman J, Fahle G, Fallon L, Gillis H, Gonzalez D, Griffiths P, Gunter K, Hirsch H, Hodowanec A, Humar A, Hunt P, Josephson F, Komatsu T, Kotton C, Krause P, Kuhr F, Lademacher C, Lanier R, Lazarus T, Leake J, Leavitt R, Lehrman SN, Li L, Ljungman P, Lodding PI, Lundgren J, Martinez-Murillo F(P, Mayer H, McCutcheon M, McKinnon J, Mertens T, Miller V, Modarress K, Mols J, Mossman S, Murata Y, Murawski D, Murray J, Natori Y, Nichols G, O’Rear J, Peggs K, Pikis A, Prichard M, Razonable R, Riches M, Roberts J, Saber W, Sayada C, Singer M, Stamminger T, Wijatyk A, Yu D, Zeiher B. Use of Viral Load as a Surrogate Marker in Clinical Studies of Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 66:617-631. [PMID: 29020339 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease has been the standard endpoint for clinical trials in organ transplant recipients. Viral load may be a more relevant endpoint due to low frequency of disease. We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. We found several lines of evidence to support the validity of viral load as an appropriate surrogate end-point, including the following: (1) viral loads in CMV disease are significantly greater than in asymptomatic viremia (odds ratio, 9.3 95% confidence interval, 4.6-19.3); (2) kinetics of viral replication are strongly associated with progression to disease; (3) pooled incidence of CMV viremia and disease is significantly lower during prophylaxis compared with the full patient follow-up period (viremia incidence: 3.2% vs 34.3%; P < .001) (disease incidence: 1.1% vs 13.0%; P < .001); (4) treatment of viremia prevented disease; and (5) viral load decline correlated with symptom resolution. Based on the analysis, we conclude that CMV load is an appropriate surrogate endpoint for CMV trials in organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichiro Natori
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ali Alghamdi
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mahmood Tazari
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Veronica Miller
- Forum for Collaborative Research, University of California, Berkeley
| | - Shahid Husain
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Takashi Komatsu
- Division of Antiviral Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Paul Griffiths
- Institute for Immunity and Transplantation, University College London Medical School, United Kingdom
| | - Per Ljungman
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Huddigne, Karolinksa Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ani Orchanian-Cheff
- Library and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deepali Kumar
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Atul Humar
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen G, Wu M, Wu B, Liu F, Liu J, Liu L. Effects of dual plasma molecular adsorption system on liver function, electrolytes, inflammation, and immunity in patients with chronic severe hepatitis. J Clin Lab Anal 2019; 33:e22926. [PMID: 31206768 PMCID: PMC6757123 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the effects of dual plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) on the liver function, electrolytes, inflammation, and immunity in patients with chronic severe hepatitis (CSH). Methods Total of 162 patients with CSH treated in our hospital from March 2016 to December 2018 were enrolled and equally randomly divided into control group (n = 81) and observation group (n = 81). The patients in control group were treated with plasma exchange, while those in observation group were additionally treated with DPMAS based on the treatment in control group. The liver function, electrolytes, inflammation, and immunity were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results After treatment, the liver function indexes in observation group were significantly favorable compared with those in control group, with the reduction in TBIL, DBIL, ALT, and rise of CHE levels (P < 0.05). The levels of K+, Na+, Cl−, and Ca2+ in both groups were significantly improved after treatment (P < 0.05), although there were no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). The levels of C‐reactive protein (CRP), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), and tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) in both groups declined after treatment compared with those before treatment, and those levels in observation group were higher than that in control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of cluster of differentiation 3+ (CD3+), CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ were higher in observation group than those in control group, with decreasing level of CD8+ (P < 0.05). Conclusion Dual plasma molecular adsorption system can effectively improve the liver function, effectively correct the electrolyte disorders, reduce the inflammatory response, and adjust the immunity in patients with CSH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gao Chen
- Department of InfectionDeyang People's HospitalDeyangChina
| | - Mengzheng Wu
- Department of InfectionDeyang People's HospitalDeyangChina
| | - Bibo Wu
- Department of InfectionDeyang People's HospitalDeyangChina
| | - Feifei Liu
- Department of InfectionDeyang People's HospitalDeyangChina
| | - Jianying Liu
- Department of InfectionDeyang People's HospitalDeyangChina
| | - Li Liu
- Department of InfectionDeyang People's HospitalDeyangChina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Navarro D, Fernández-Ruiz M, Aguado JM, Sandonís V, Pérez-Romero P. Going beyond serology for stratifying the risk of CMV infection in transplant recipients. Rev Med Virol 2018; 29:e2017. [PMID: 30358016 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Knowledge of donor and recipient (D/R) cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus is critical for risk stratification of CMV infection and disease in transplant recipients, particularly in the solid organ transplantation (SOT) setting. Despite its broad availability and the success of it use, the risk stratification based on the D/R serostatus is not free of limitations since there are a nondepreciable number of patients that are not accurately categorized by this approach. In fact, up to 20% of seropositive SOT recipients, classically considered at intermediate risk, develop episodes of CMV infection and disease after transplantation. Here, we provide an overview of additional donor and recipient factors that may have utility in identifying patients at risk for post-transplant CMV infection. Specifically, we summarize our current understanding regarding the potential use of use CMV-specific T-cell-mediated immunity, neutralizing antibodies and host genetics that may influence the risk of CMV infection and disease. We provide an overview of the benefits and limitations associated with using these immunological factors in risk stratification and propose specific variables that could be analyzed at the pretransplant evaluation to improve the identification of patients with increased individual susceptibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Navarro
- Microbiology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Fundación INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mario Fernández-Ruiz
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital,"12 de Octubre" (i+12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - José María Aguado
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital,"12 de Octubre" (i+12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Virginia Sandonís
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital,"12 de Octubre" (i+12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Pérez-Romero
- National Center of Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Induction of immune tolerance and altered cytokine expression in skin transplantation recipients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2018; 34:330-334. [DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Revised: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
|
8
|
Busch CJ, Siegler BH, Werle H, Lichtenstern C, Bruckner T, Heininger A, Mehrabi A, Weiss KH, Weigand MA, Hochreiter M. Risk factors for early viral infections after liver transplantation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2018; 403:509-519. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-018-1672-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
9
|
Aguilera V, Di Maira T, Conde I, Fornés-Ferrer V, Vinaixa C, Pallarés C, Carvalho-Gomes A, Cubells A, García M, Rubín Á, Benlloch S, Gonzalez-Dieguez L, Molina JM, Puchades L, López-Labrador FX, Prieto M, Berenguer M. Cytomegalovirus reactivation in liver transplant recipients due to hepatitis C cirrhosis is associated with higher cardiovascular risk - an observational, retrospective study. Transpl Int 2018; 31:649-657. [PMID: 29493818 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The association between cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and cardiovascular risk has been reported in solid organ transplant populations; however, it has yet to be assessed in liver transplantation (LT). We aim to evaluate whether CMV reactivation is associated with cardiovascular events (CVE) in HCV-LT patients. LT patients (2010 and 2014) due to HCV cirrhosis were included. Clinically significant CMV (CS-CMV) was defined as viral load (VL) >5000 copies/ml, need of therapy or CMV disease. Baseline variables and endpoint measures (CVE, survival, severe recurrent hepatitis C, de novo tumors, and diabetes) were collected. One hundred and forty patients were included. At LT, a history of AHT was present in 23%, diabetes 22%, tobacco use 45%, obesity 20%, and renal impairment (eGFR < 60 ml/min) in 26.5%. CS-CMV reactivation occurred in 25% of patients. Twenty-six patients (18.5%) developed a CVE. Cox regression analysis revealed two factors significantly associated with CVE: Pre-LT DM [HR = 4.6 95% CI (1.6, 13), P = 0.004] and CS-CMV [HR = 4.7 95% CI (1.8, 12.5), P = 0.002]. CS-CMV was not independently associated with the remaining endpoints except for survival (P = 0.03). In our series, CS-CMV reactivation was associated with a greater risk of developing CVE, thus confirming data from other solid organ transplant populations and emphasizing the need for adequate CMV control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Aguilera
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Valencia, Spain
| | - Tommaso Di Maira
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Isabel Conde
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,Laboratorio de Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Carmen Vinaixa
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carmen Pallarés
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Valencia, Spain.,Laboratorio de Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Angela Carvalho-Gomes
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Valencia, Spain.,Laboratorio de Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Almudena Cubells
- Laboratorio de Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - María García
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ángel Rubín
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Valencia, Spain
| | - Salvador Benlloch
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Jose Miguel Molina
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Lorena Puchades
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - F Xavier López-Labrador
- Fundación para el fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBER ESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Martin Prieto
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Valencia, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bodro M, Sanclemente G, Crespo G, Linares L, Marcos MA, Marco F, Miquel R, Forns X, Navasa M, Moreno A. Severe Hepatitis C Recurrence as a Risk Factor for Opportunistic Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:1437-1443. [PMID: 29880367 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Revised: 12/13/2017] [Accepted: 02/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to determine the clinical characteristics, frequency of opportunistic infections (OI), and the outcomes for liver transplant recipients with severe hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence. In addition, the objective was to evaluate HCV recurrence as a risk factor for developing an OI. METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study recording all liver transplant recipients from July 1, 2003, to December 31, 2012. Patients with liver disease due to HCV were selected. Active surveillance of infections was conducted periodically, and patients were classified according to presence of severe HCV recurrence. RESULTS Three hundred seventy patients underwent liver transplantation because of chronic HCV. One hundred forty-seven patients presented severe recurrence (SR) (49%) and 50 (17%) of them had post-liver transplant cholestatic hepatitis C. Patients with SR presented OI, especially cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections and invasive fungal infections, more frequently than patients without SR (33% vs 13%; P < .001). From the diagnosis of SR to the presentation of OI, the median number of days was 169 (6-2083). Acute allograft rejection (OR 1.8 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.3) donor age ≥60 years (OR 2.9 95% CI 1.3-6.8), and SR (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6-5.1) were independently associated with the development of OI in liver transplant recipients. CONCLUSION A high index of suspicion of opportunistic infections must be maintained when faced with severe HCV recurrence in liver transplant recipients. Moreover, active surveillance against CMV infection and other prophylactic strategies against opportunistic infections should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bodro
- Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS-CIBERHED, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - G Sanclemente
- Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS-CIBERHED, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Crespo
- Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS-CIBERHED, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Linares
- Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS-CIBERHED, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M A Marcos
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS-CIBERHED, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Marco
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS-CIBERHED, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Miquel
- Pathology Unit, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS-CIBERHED, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - X Forns
- Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS-CIBERHED, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Navasa
- Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS-CIBERHED, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Moreno
- Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS-CIBERHED, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Impact of Cytomegalovirus Infection on Severe Hepatitis C Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2017; 101:e40. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Management of post liver transplantation recurrent hepatitis C infection with directly acting antiviral drugs: a review. Hepatol Int 2016; 10:749-61. [PMID: 27337961 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-016-9744-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Recurrent HCV infection (rHCV) of the liver allograft following transplantation is universal and is associated with poor graft and patient survival in comparison with other indications. Treatment of rHCV infection in the previous era with pegylated interferon and ribavirin was associated with low sustained virological response (SVR) due to poor tolerability, adverse events and graft rejection. Recently, directly acting antiviral drugs (DAA) have been approved for the treatment of hepatitis C infection and a number of clinical trials have been conducted across various centers in the management of rHCV infection of the graft. In this review we discuss about recent studies that have emerged on the use of NS5b polymerase inhibitor, sofosbuvir in combination with second generation protease inhibitor, simeprevir, fixed dose ledipasvir or daclatasvir with or without ribavirin in the treatment of post transplant rHCV infection.
Collapse
|