1
|
Guo Z, Liu Y, Ling Q, Xu L, Wang T, Zhu J, Lin Y, Lu X, Qu W, Zhang F, Zhu Z, Zhang J, Jia Z, Zeng P, Wang W, Sun Q, Luo Q, Hu Z, Zheng Z, Jia Y, Li J, Zheng Y, Wang M, Wang S, Han Z, Yu S, Li C, Zhang S, Xiong J, Deng F, Liu Y, Chen H, Wang Y, Li L, Liang W, Schlegel A, Björn N, Liu C, Zheng S, He X. Pre-transplant Use of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00278-8. [PMID: 38642712 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a downstaging or bridging therapy for liver transplantation (LT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is rapidly increasing. However, the evidence about the feasibility and safety of pre-LT ICIs therapy is limited and controversial. To this end, a multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted in 11 Chinese centers. The results showed that 83 recipients received pre-LT ICIs therapy during the study period. The median post-LT follow up was 8.1 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.3-14.6) months. During the short follow-up, 23 (27.7%) recipients developed allograft rejection, and 7 of them (30.4%) was diagnosed by liver biopsy. Multivariate logistics regression analysis showed that time interval between the last administration of ICIs therapy and LT (TLAT) ≥ 30 days was an independent protective factor for allograft rejection (OR = 0.096, 95%CI 0.026-0.357; P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that allograft rejection was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) (HR = 9.960, 95%CI 1.006-98.610; P = 0.043). We conclude that patients who receive a pre-LT ICIs therapy with a TLAT shorter than 30 days have a much higher risk of allograft rejection than those with a TLAT longer than 30 days. The presence of rejection episodes might be associated with a higher post-LT mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyong Guo
- Organ Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou 510080, China; NHC key Laboratory of Assisted Circulation (Sun Yat-sen University), Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Yao Liu
- Organ Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Qi Ling
- Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 311121, China; Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou 311121, China
| | - Leibo Xu
- Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Tielong Wang
- Organ Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Jiaxing Zhu
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Yimou Lin
- Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 311121, China; Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou 311121, China
| | - Xinjun Lu
- Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Wei Qu
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing100000, China; Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Capital Medical University, Beijing100000, China
| | - Fan Zhang
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing100000, China; Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Capital Medical University, Beijing100000, China
| | - Zhijun Zhu
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing100000, China; Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Capital Medical University, Beijing100000, China
| | - Jian Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Zehua Jia
- Organ Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Ping Zeng
- Organ Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Wenjing Wang
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Qiang Sun
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528403, China
| | - Qijie Luo
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528403, China
| | - Zemin Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528403, China
| | - Zhouying Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China
| | - Yingbin Jia
- Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China
| | - Yujian Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, Guangzhou 510010, China
| | - Mengchao Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, Guangzhou 510010, China
| | - Shaoping Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, Guangzhou 510010, China
| | - Zemin Han
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Sheng Yu
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Chuanjiang Li
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Shuhua Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of General Surgery, Liver transplant center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Jun Xiong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of General Surgery, Liver transplant center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Feiwen Deng
- Liver Surgery Department, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528010, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Liver Surgery Department, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528010, China
| | - Huanwei Chen
- Liver Surgery Department, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528010, China
| | - Yanfeng Wang
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Transplant Center of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan 430071, China
| | - Ling Li
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Transplant Center of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan 430071, China
| | - Wenjin Liang
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Transplant Center of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan 430071, China
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- Transplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of Immunity and Inflammation, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Nashan Björn
- Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China
| | - Chao Liu
- Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 311121, China; Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou 311121, China.
| | - Xiaoshun He
- Organ Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou 510080, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Åberg F, Sallinen V, Tuominen S, Adam R, Karam V, Mirza D, Heneghan MA, Line PD, Bennet W, Ericzon BG, Grat M, Lodge P, Rasmussen A, Schmelzle M, Thorburn D, Fondevila C, Helanterä I, Nordin A. Cyclosporine vs. tacrolimus after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis - a propensity score-matched intention-to-treat analysis. J Hepatol 2024; 80:99-108. [PMID: 37722533 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There is controversy regarding the optimal calcineurin inhibitor type after liver transplant(ation) (LT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We compared tacrolimus with cyclosporine in a propensity score-matched intention-to-treat analysis based on registries representing nearly all LTs in Europe and the US. METHODS From the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), we included adult patients with PSC undergoing a primary LT between 2000-2020. Patients initially treated with cyclosporine were propensity score-matched 1:3 with those initially treated with tacrolimus. The primary outcomes were patient and graft survival rates. RESULTS The propensity score-matched sample comprised 399 cyclosporine-treated and 1,197 tacrolimus-treated patients with PSC. During a median follow-up of 7.4 years (IQR 2.3-12.8, 12,579.2 person-years), there were 480 deaths and 231 re-LTs. The initial tacrolimus treatment was superior to cyclosporine in terms of patient and graft survival, with 10-year patient survival estimates of 72.8% for tacrolimus and 65.2% for cyclosporine (p <0.001) and 10-year graft survival estimates of 62.4% and 53.8% (p <0.001), respectively. These findings were consistent in the subgroups according to age, sex, registry (ELTR vs. SRTR), time period of LT, MELD score, and diabetes status. The acute rejection rates were similar between groups. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, tacrolimus (hazard ratio 0.72, p <0.001) and mycophenolate use (hazard ratio 0.82, p = 0.03) were associated with a reduced risk of graft loss or death, whereas steroid use was not significant. CONCLUSIONS Tacrolimus is associated with better patient and graft survival rates than cyclosporine and should be the standard calcineurin inhibitor used after LT for patients with PSC. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS The optimal calcineurin inhibitor to use after liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis has yet to be firmly established. Since randomized trials with long follow-up are unlikely to be performed, multicontinental long-term registry data are essential in informing clinical practices. Our study supports the practice of using tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine in the initial immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. The retrospective registry-based design is a limitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Åberg
- Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Transplantation and Liver Surgery Unit, Finland.
| | - Ville Sallinen
- Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Transplantation and Liver Surgery Unit, Finland
| | | | - René Adam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, APHP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université, Paris-Sud, Inserm U 935, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincent Karam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, APHP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université, Paris-Sud, Inserm U 935, Villejuif, France
| | - Darius Mirza
- The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Medical Center, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Pål-Dag Line
- Rikshospitalet, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo, Norway; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - William Bennet
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Transplant Institute, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Bo-Göran Ericzon
- Karolinska Institutet, CLINTEC, Division of Transplantation Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michal Grat
- Medical University of Warsaw, Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Peter Lodge
- St James & Seacroft University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Allan Rasmussen
- University Hospital Copenhagen, Department for Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Hannover Medical School, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | - Ilkka Helanterä
- Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Transplantation and Liver Surgery Unit, Finland
| | - Arno Nordin
- Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Transplantation and Liver Surgery Unit, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cederborg A, Norén Å, Barten T, Lindkvist B, Bennet W, Herlenius G, Castedal M, Marschall HU, Åberg F. Renal function after liver transplantation: Real-world experience with basiliximab induction and delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:1076-1083. [PMID: 34965904 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine use of delayed reduced-dose calcineurin-inhibitor treatment with induction immunosuppression in liver transplantation to minimize post-operative kidney injury is still scarce. AIM To evaluate real-world experience of basiliximab induction with delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus. METHODS In a retrospective cohort study, kidney function was evaluated pre- and postoperatively by measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR). Adult patients undergoing liver transplantation between 2000 and 2017 were divided into a conventional treatment group (immediate-introduction of tacrolimus, target trough levels 10-15 ng/mL, and corticosteroids, n = 203) and a revised treatment group (basiliximab induction, reduced-dose tacrolimus, target through levels 5-8 ng/mL, delayed until day three, and mycophenolate mofetil 2000 mg/day, n = 343). RESULTS Mean mGFR was similar between groups at wait-listing (85.3 vs 84.1 ml/min/1.73m², p = 0.60), but higher in the revised treatment group at 3 (56.8 vs 63.4 ml/min/1.73m², p = 0.004) and 12 months post-transplant (60.9 vs 69.7 ml/min/1.73m², p<0.001); this difference remained after correcting for multiple confounders and was independent of pre-transplant mGFR. In the revised treatment group, biopsy proven acute rejection rate was lower (38% vs. 21%, p<0.001), and graft-survival better (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION Basiliximab induction with delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus is associated with less kidney injury when compared to standard-dose tacrolimus, without increased risk of rejection, graft loss or death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Cederborg
- Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Åsa Norén
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thijs Barten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Björn Lindkvist
- Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - William Bennet
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Gustaf Herlenius
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Maria Castedal
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hanns-Ulrich Marschall
- Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Åberg
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Transplantation and Liver Surgery Clinic, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Friman TK, Jäämaa-Holmberg S, Åberg F, Helanterä I, Halme M, Pentikäinen MO, Nordin A, Lemström KB, Jahnukainen T, Räty R, Salmela B. Cancer risk and mortality after solid organ transplantation - A population-based 30-year cohort study in Finland. Int J Cancer 2022; 150:1779-1791. [PMID: 35041762 PMCID: PMC9306582 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Cancer is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and related to lifelong immunosuppression. This retrospective registry study assessed for the first time in Finland population‐based cancer risk and cancer mortality after all SOTs (lung and childhood transplantations included) as standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). Data from transplant registries were linked with the data of Finnish Cancer Registry and Statistics Finland. We followed 6548 consecutive first SOT recipients from 1 January 1987 to 31 December 2016 translating to 66 741 person‐years (median follow‐up time 8.9 years [interquartile range 4.0‐15.1]). In total, 2096 cancers were found in 1483 patients (23% of all patients). Majority of cancers (53%) were nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs). The overall SIR was 3.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.5‐3.8) and the SIR excluding NMSCs was 2.2 (95% CI: 2.0‐2.3). SIR for all cancers was highest for heart (5.0) and lowest for liver (2.7) recipients. Most common cancer types after NMSCs were non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), SIR 9.9 (95% CI: 8.5‐11.4) and kidney cancer, SIR 7.3 (95% CI: 6.0‐8.8). Cancer‐related deaths were 17% (n = 408) of all deaths after first month post transplantation. SMR for all cancers was 2.5 (95% CI: 2.2‐2.7) and for NHL 13.6 (95% CI: 10.7‐16.8). Notably, overall SIR for cancer was lower in later period (2000‐2016), 3.0 (95% CI: 2.8‐3.2), than in earlier period (1987‐1999), 4.3 (95% CI: 4.0‐4.5), P < .001. Decrease in cancer incidence was temporally associated with major changes in immunosuppression in the 2000s.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terhi K Friman
- Department of Hematology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Salla Jäämaa-Holmberg
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyvinkää Hospital Area, Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Fredrik Åberg
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ilkka Helanterä
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maija Halme
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Markku O Pentikäinen
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Arno Nordin
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Karl B Lemström
- Department of Heart and thoracic surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Timo Jahnukainen
- New Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Riikka Räty
- Department of Hematology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Birgitta Salmela
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Heart Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lindenger C, Castedal M, Schult A, Åberg F. Long-term survival and predictors of relapse and survival after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018; 53:1553-1561. [PMID: 30678557 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1536226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Studies of predictive factors of alcohol recidivism and survival post-LT are not up-to-date. With evolving LT activity and with longer-term outcomes becoming increasingly available, re-evaluating post-LT outcomes is imperative. We analyzed recent data on survival, alcohol recurrence and predictive factors. METHODS We compared long-term survival among 159 consecutive ALD patients transplanted 2003-2016 with 159 propensity-score matched controls transplanted for non-ALD. Alcohol 'slips' (occasional lapse) and relapse to moderate or harmful drinking were assessed from medical records and structured forms filled in by home-district physicians, and analyzed by competing-risk and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Patient and graft survival at 10 years were 75 and 69% in the ALD group and 65 and 63% in the control group (p=.06 and .36). In ALD patients, the 10-year cumulative rate of alcohol slip was 52% and of relapse, 37%. Duration of pre-LT abstinence (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99) and a history of prior alcohol relapses (HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.41-6.60) were significant predictors of relapse, but failed to predict death/graft loss. Patients with <6 months abstinence relapsed sooner than those with 7-24 months abstinence, but 10-year relapse rates were similar (40-50%). Ten-year relapse rate with 2-5-year pre-LT abstinence was 21%, and with >5-year abstinence, 0%. In patients with <6 months pre-LT abstinence, years of heavy drinking, prior addiction treatments, and lack of children predicted inferior survival. CONCLUSIONS Although 37% of our ALD patients relapsed to drinking by 10 years post-LT, 14-year survival was not significantly different from survival in non-ALD patients. Short duration of pre-LT abstinence and prior relapses predicted post-LT relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Lindenger
- a The Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Maria Castedal
- a The Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Andreas Schult
- a The Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Fredrik Åberg
- a The Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|