Disparities in Waitlist and Posttransplantation Outcomes in Liver Transplant Registrants and Recipients Aged 18 to 24 Years: Analysis of the UNOS Database

UK guideline on the transition and management of childhood liver diseases in adulthood

INTRODUCTION

Improved outcomes of liver disease in childhood and young adulthood have resulted in an increasing number of young adults (YA) entering adult liver services. The adult hepatologist therefore requires a working knowledge in diseases that arise almost exclusively in children and their complications in adulthood.

AIMS

To provide adult hepatologists with succinct guidelines on aspects of transitional care in YA relevant to key disease aetiologies encountered in clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was undertaken using the Pubmed, Medline, Web of Knowledge and Cochrane database from 1980 to 2023. MeSH search terms relating to liver diseases ('cholestatic liver diseases', 'biliary atresia', 'metabolic', 'paediatric liver diseases', 'autoimmune liver diseases'), transition to adult care ('transition services', 'young adult services') and adolescent care were used. The quality of evidence and the grading of recommendations were appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

These guidelines deal with the transition of YA and address key aetiologies for the adult hepatologist under the following headings: (1) Models and provision of care; (2) screening and management of mental health disorders; (3) aetiologies; (4) timing and role of liver transplantation; and (5) sexual health and fertility.

CONCLUSIONS

These are the first nationally developed guidelines on the transition and management of childhood liver diseases in adulthood. They provide a framework upon which to base clinical care, which we envisage will lead to improved outcomes for YA with chronic liver disease.

Transitional care models in adolescent kidney transplant recipients-a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adolescence is a time of significant change for patients, guardians and clinicians. The paediatrician must ensure patients develop the necessary skills and knowledge required to transition and to function as an independent entity, with autonomy over their own care. The transfer from paediatric to adult care carries an increased risk of graft-related complications attributable to a multitude of reasons, particularly non-adherence to immunosuppressive medicines and poor attendance at scheduled appointments. This systematic review was conducted to ascertain the transitional care models available to clinicians caring for kidney transplant recipients and to compare the approach in each respective case.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed, in a methodology outlined by the PRISMA guidelines. OVID MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies that outlined valid, replicable models pertaining to transitional care of paediatric kidney transplant recipients between 1946 and Quarter 3 of 2021. The reference lists of selected articles were also perused for further eligible studies and experts in the field were consulted for further eligible articles. Two investigators assessed all studies for eligibility and independently performed data extraction. Any discrepancies were settled by consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 1121 abstracts were identified, which was reduced to 1029 upon removal of duplicates. A total of 51 articles were deemed appropriate for full-text review and critical appraisal. A total of 12 articles that described models for transition pertaining to kidney transplant patients were included in qualitative synthesis. Every paper utilized a different transition model. All but one model included a physician and nurse at minimum in the transition process. The involvement of adult nephrologists, medical social work, psychology and psychiatry was variable. The mean age for the initiation of transition was 13.4 years (range: 10-17.5 years). The mean age at transfer to adult services was 18.3 years (range: 16-20.5 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the well-established need for good transitional care for paediatric solid-organ transplant recipients, models tailored specifically for kidney transplant recipients are lacking. Further research and validation studies are required to ascertain the best method of providing effective transitional care to these patients. Transitional care should become a standardized process for adolescents and young adults with kidney transplants.

Rising Trend in Waitlisting for Alcoholic Hepatitis With More Favorable Outcomes Than Other High Model for End-stage Liver Disease in the Current Era

BACKGROUND

In the appropriate candidate, liver transplantation (LT) is a viable treatment for alcoholic hepatitis (AH). We compared the waitlisting trends and outcomes of AH patients in the context of others with high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score.

METHODS

LT listings for AH between January 1, 2008, and June 12, 2020 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Temporal trends in listings for AH were assessed. Covariate adjusted competing risks models evaluated waitlist mortality and LT rates between AH candidates and others with listing native MELD ≥30.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2019, waitlist additions for AH increased 6.5-fold. Waiting time for AH candidates was short (median 10 d). Delisting for clinical improvement was infrequent in AH, albeit higher than MELD ≥30 patients (3.3% versus 0.8%; P < 0.001). Among 99 centers with ≥1 AH listing, AH patients accounted for 0.2%-18.2% of all alcohol-related listings and 0.6%-25.0% of those with native listing MELD ≥30. Overall listing volume was larger at these 99 centers than the 40 with no AH listings (P < 0.001). AH candidates in 2014-2020 experienced improved waitlist survival (adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.86; P = 0.002) and higher transplant rates (adjusted subhazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.25; P = 0.006) versus other MELD ≥30 candidates.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a rising trend in waitlisting patients with AH and high MELD score. Liver disease causes influence waitlist outcomes and those of AH candidates are more favorable. Further research and allocation adjustments may be needed to ensure equitable organ allocation, based on liver disease cause, for those on the LT waitlist.

Inferior outcomes in young adults undergoing liver transplantation - a UK and Ireland cohort study

Graft loss incidence is reported to be inversely related to recipient age. We used a national cohort of liver transplant (LT) recipients from the United Kingdom and Ireland to compare the age-dependent risk of graft failure in different post-transplantation time-periods ('epochs'). A cohort of first-time LT recipients (1995-2016) were identified (11 006). Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) comparing graft loss between age-groups (18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 and 60-76 years) and graft loss in different post-transplant epochs: 0-90 days, 90 days-2 years and 2-10 years. The risk of graft failure was highest in those transplanted between age 18 and 29 (adjusted HR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.00-1.57, P = 0.04) and in those aged 30-39 (adjusted HR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.11-1.55, P = 0.02). Graft failure in those under the age of 40 was similar in the first 90 days but worse 2-10 years' post-LT (18-29 years HR 1.36, 95% CI: 0.96-1.93, P < 0.001). Graft failure because of chronic rejection (CR) was more common in recipients aged 18-29 (P < 0.001). Adults transplanted between age 18 and 39 are at risk of late graft loss. CR is a concern for young adults (18-29 years). Our data highlights the need for specialist young adult services within adult healthcare.

Liver Transplantation for Biliary Atresia in Adulthood: Single-Centre Surgical Experience

Background: Biliary atresia (BA) is the most common indicator for liver transplant (LT) in children, however, approximately 22% will reach adulthood with their native liver, and of these, half will require transplantation later in life. The aim of this study was to analyse the surgical challenges and outcomes of patients with BA undergoing LT in adulthood. Methods: Patients with BA requiring LT at the age of 16 or older in our unit between 1989 and 2020 were included. Pretransplant, perioperative variables and outcomes were analysed. Pretransplant imaging was reviewed to assess liver appearance, spontaneous visceral portosystemic shunting (SPSS), splenomegaly, splenic artery (SA) size, and aneurysms. Results: Thirty-four patients who underwent LT for BA fulfilled the inclusion criteria, at a median age of 24 years. The main indicators for LT were synthetic failure and recurrent cholangitis. In total, 57.6% had significant enlargement of the SA, 21% had multiple SA aneurysm, and SPSS was present in 72.7% of the patients. Graft and patient survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97.1%, 91.2%, 91.2% and 100%, 94%, 94%, respectively Conclusions: Good outcomes after LT for BA in young patients can be achieved with careful donor selection and surgery to minimise the risk of complications. Identification of anatomical variants and shunting are helpful in guiding attitude at the time of transplant.

Age disparities in transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to outline disparities in liver and kidney transplantation across age spectrum. Disparities do not involve only recipients whose age may severely affect the possibility to access to a potentially life-saving procedure, but donors as well. The attitude of transplant centers to use older donors reflects on waiting list mortality and drop-out. This review examines which age categories are currently harmed and how different allocation systems may minimize disparities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Specific age categories suffer disparities in the access to transplantation. A better understanding of how properly evaluate graft quality, a continuous re-evaluation of the most favorable donor-to-recipient match and most equitable allocation system are the three key points to promote 'justice and equality' among transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

The duty to protect younger patients waiting for transplantation and the request of older patients to have access to potentially life-saving treatment urge the transplant community to use older organs thus increasing the number of available grafts, to evaluate new allocation systems with the aim to maximize 'utility' while respecting 'equity' and to avoid 'futility' thus minimizing waiting list mortality and drop-out, and improving the survival benefits for all patients requiring a transplant.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/COOT/A9.

Adult Liver Disease Prognostic Modelling for Long-term Outcomes in Biliary Atresia: An Observational Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the utility of prognostic scoring systems for adolescents with biliary atresia (BA) surviving with native liver, for predicting the subsequent requirement for liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

Single-centre retrospective analysis of 397 BA patients who received Kasai Portoenterostomy (KP) 1980-1996 and survived with the native liver at 16 years. Laboratory and clinical variables at 16 years (timepoint 16 years) were used to calculate (i) LT allocation scores; Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD/MELD-sodium (Na)], and UK End-Stage Liver Disease (UKELD); (ii) Mayo Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis risk score (MayoPSC) and (iii) a modified Paediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) score. Scores were compared between patients requiring LT after 16 years of age (LT > 16 years), and those who survived with native liver, at the latest follow-up. Additional subgroup analysis for patients with data available at 12 years (timepoint 12 years).

RESULTS

MELD (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] 0.847) and UKELD (AUROC: 0.815) at 16 years of age predict the need for LT > 16 years. No advantage for MELD-Na over MELD was demonstrated. MELD >8.5 and UKELD >47 predicted LT > 16 years with 84% and 79% sensitivity and 73% and 73% specificity. PELD had a similar performance to MELD, but superiority to UKELD. MayoPSC revealed predictive accuracy for LT >16 years (AUROC 0.859), with a score of >0.87 predicting LT > 16 years with 85% sensitivity and 82% specificity. At timepoint 12 years, MELD and MayoPSC predicted LT >16 years. Change in MELD, PELD and MayoPSC between 12 and 16 years of age, was associated with LT >16 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult LT allocation scores may help monitor progress in adolescent BA, but the omission of relevant risk factors limits their utility for listing in this cohort. A BA-specific prognostic score would improve the management of adolescent BA.

Impact of Payer Status on Delisting Among Liver Transplant Candidates in the United States

Although socioeconomic disparities persist both pre- and post-transplantation, the impact of payer status has not been studied at the national level. We examined the association between public insurance coverage and waitlist outcomes among candidates listed for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. All adults (age ≥18 years) listed for LT between 2002 and 2018 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. The primary outcome was waitlist removal because of death or clinical deterioration. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests, respectively. Fine and Gray competing-risks regression was used to estimate the subdistribution hazard ratios (HRs) for risk factors associated with delisting. Of 131,839 patients listed for LT, 61.2% were covered by private insurance, 22.9% by Medicare, and 15.9% by Medicaid. The 1-year cumulative incidence of delisting was 9.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3%-9.8%) for patients with private insurance, 10.7% (95% CI, 9.9%-11.6%) for Medicare, and 10.7% (95% CI, 9.8%-11.6%) for Medicaid. In multivariable competing-risks analysis, Medicare (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.17-1.24; P < 0.001) and Medicaid (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16-1.24; P < 0.001) were independently associated with an increased hazard of death or deterioration compared with private insurance. Additional predictors of delisting included Black race and Hispanic ethnicity, whereas college education and employment were associated with a decreased hazard of delisting. In this study, LT candidates with Medicare or Medicaid had a 20% increased risk of delisting because of death or clinical deterioration compared with those with private insurance. As more patients use public insurance to cover the cost of LT, targeted waitlist management protocols may mitigate the increased risk of delisting in this population.

A Review of the Current State of Liver Transplantation Disparities

Equity in access is one of the core goals of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN). However, disparities in liver transplantation have been described since the passage of the National Organ Transplant Act, which established OPTN in the 1980s. During the past few decades, several efforts have been made by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to address disparities in liver transplantation with notable improvements in many areas. Nonetheless, disparities have persisted across insurance type, sex, race/ethnicity, geographic area, and age. African Americans have lower rates of referral to transplant centers, females have lower rates of transplantation from the liver waiting list than males, and public insurance is associated with worse posttransplant outcomes than private insurance. In addition, pediatric candidates and older adults have a disadvantage on the liver transplant waiting list, and there are widespread regional disparities in transplantation. Given the large degree of inequity in liver transplantation, there is a tremendous need for studies to propose and model policy changes that may make the liver transplant system more just and equitable.

Impact of active antibody-mediated rejection treatment on donor-specific antibodies in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

AMR is a major cause of graft loss after kidney transplantation. We evaluated a retrospective cohort of 13 pediatric kidney transplant patients diagnosed with active AMR. All 13 patients were treated with plasmapheresis (PP), IVIg, and rituximab. Anti-HLA DSAs were measured at the time of transplantation, AMR diagnosis, 30 days post-rejection treatment, 90 days post-rejection treatment, and 24 ± 12 months post-AMR. A total of 68 DSAs were identified from 13 patients at the time of active AMR diagnosis. The primary objective of this study was to differentiate treatment response rates between class I and class II anti-HLA DSA post-AMR treatment. Overall, DSAs were significantly reduced at 30 days, and the reduction was sustained at 90 days post-treatment, even for class II anti-HLA and strongly positive DSAs. A significant difference between class I and class II anti-HLA DSA was observed at 30 days; however, between class significance was lost at 90-day follow-up due to continued class II anti-HLA DSA treatment response. Low DSA strength was predictive of treatment response. eGFR demonstrated significant improvement 90 days after AMR diagnosis compared to the initial value at the time of AMR, and the effect was sustained for 12 months. These results suggest that the AMR treatment is effective in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with an early diagnosis of active AMR across both class I and class II anti-HLA DSAs.

20- to 25-year patient and graft survival following a single pediatric liver transplant-Analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing database: Where to go from here

To understand factors contributing to liver graft loss and patient death, we queried a national database designed to follow pediatric patients transplanted between 1987 and 1995 till adulthood. A comparison was made to a cohort transplanted between 2000 and 2014. The 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-year patient survival and graft survival were 95.5%, 93.7%, 89.1%, 80.8%, and 73.1%, and 92.5%, 86.7%, 77.6%, 68.7%, and 62.2%, respectively. The twenty-year patient/graft survival was significantly worse in those transplanted between 5 and 17 years of age compared to those transplanted at <5 years of age (P < 0.001). For the modern era cohort, the 3-year patient survival was significantly lower in children transplanted at 16-17 years of age compared to those transplanted at <5 and 11-15 years of age (P ≤ 0.02). The 3-year graft survival was similarly lower in children transplanted at 16-17 years of age compared to those transplanted at <5, 5-10, and 11-15 years of age (P ≤ 0.001). Infection as a cause of death occurred either early or >15 years post-transplant. Chronic rejection remained the leading cause of graft loss in both cohorts and the commonest indication for retransplantation 20-25 years following primary transplant. Further research is required to identify modifiable factors contributing to development of chronic rejection.

Young People With Biliary Atresia Requiring Liver Transplantation: A Distinct Population Requiring Specialist Care

BACKGROUND

Young people (YP) born with biliary atresia (BA) are an emerging population for adult hepatologists with 40% to 45% of children entering adolescence with their native liver intact. For those requiring liver transplantation (LT) during adolescence, disparity on the waiting list and post-LT outcome for young adults compared with younger and older age groups has stimulated discussion about the optimal timing of listing. In this study, we review our experience of YP with BA requiring LT during adolescence and young adulthood.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center review of patients with BA requiring LT > 11 years.

RESULTS

Thirty-six YP (16 male) underwent LT between 1991 and 2014 at a median age of 16.6 (interquartile range [IQR], 14.2 to 19.5) years. The commonest indications for listing were refractory cholangitis (31%), synthetic failure (25%), and variceal bleeding (14%). Patients listed by the adult team (n = 14) waited longer than those listed by the pediatric team (10 [IQR, 7.7 to 24.6] vs 5.8 [IQR, 4.0 to 15.1] months; P < 0.05) and were more likely to require intensive care support at time of listing (29% vs 5%; P < 0.05). Admission to intensive care unit at listing was associated with poorer patient and graft survival and support from a multidisciplinary liver transition service improved survival. Liver disease severity scores did not correlate with time on waiting list or outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

YP with BA requires close monitoring by specialists familiar with their condition and timing for LT needs to be fine-tuned to avoid clinical decompensation and improve long-term outcomes.

Digital Wings: Innovations in Transition Readiness for Adolescent and Young Adult Transplant Recipients [corrected]

The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine organized 2 multistakeholder symposia on February 2, 2018 and January 11, 2019 to address the problem of high graft failure in adolescent and young adult (AYA) solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Participants included international experts in transplantation, behavioral psychology, patient/parent advocacy, and technology. The objectives of the symposia were as follows: (1) to identify and discuss the barriers to and facilitators of effective transfer of care for AYA SOT recipients; (2) to actively explore strategies and digital solutions to promote their successful transfer of care; and (3) to develop meaningful partnerships for the successful development, evaluation, implementation, and dissemination of these digital solutions. Additionally, data were collected from 152 AYA SOT recipients demonstrating a substantial gap in how this population uses technologies for health-related activities, alongside an increased interest in an app to help them manage their transplant.