1
|
Aburahma K, de Manna ND, Kuehn C, Salman J, Greer M, Ius F. Pushing the Survival Bar Higher: Two Decades of Innovation in Lung Transplantation. J Clin Med 2024; 13:5516. [PMID: 39337005 PMCID: PMC11432129 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Revised: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Survival after lung transplantation has significantly improved during the last two decades. The refinement of the already existing extracorporeal life support (ECLS) systems, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and the introduction of new techniques for donor lung optimization, such as ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), have allowed the extension of transplant indication to patients with end-stage lung failure after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the expansion of the donor organ pool, due to the better evaluation and optimization of extended-criteria donor (ECD) lungs and of donors after circulatory death (DCD). The close monitoring of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) has allowed the early recognition of pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which requires a completely different treatment and has a worse prognosis than acute cellular rejection (ACR). As such, the standardization of patient selection and post-transplant management has significantly contributed to this positive trend, especially at high-volume centers. This review focuses on lung transplantation after ARDS, on the role of EVLP in lung donor expansion, on ECMO as a principal cardiopulmonary support system in lung transplantation, and on the diagnosis and therapy of pulmonary AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalil Aburahma
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Nunzio Davide de Manna
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Christian Kuehn
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- German Centre for Lung Research (DZL/BREATH), 35392 Hannover, Germany
| | - Jawad Salman
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- German Centre for Lung Research (DZL/BREATH), 35392 Hannover, Germany
| | - Mark Greer
- German Centre for Lung Research (DZL/BREATH), 35392 Hannover, Germany
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Fabio Ius
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- German Centre for Lung Research (DZL/BREATH), 35392 Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kleiboeker HL, Prom A, Paplaczyk K, Myers CN. A Complement to Traditional Treatments for Antibody-Mediated Rejection? Use of Eculizumab in Lung Transplantation: A Review and Early Center Experience. Ann Pharmacother 2024; 58:947-955. [PMID: 37994573 DOI: 10.1177/10600280231213112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the efficacy and safety of eculizumab for prevention and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). DATA SOURCES A literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (2007 to mid-October 2023) was performed using the following search terms: eculizumab, complement inhibitor, solid organ transplant, lung transplant, and AMR. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION All relevant English-language studies were reviewed and considered. DATA SYNTHESIS Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds complement protein C5 to inhibit its cleavage and subsequent generation of the membrane attack complex, is currently approved to treat paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, generalized myasthenia and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Given the role of antibodies directed against donor antigens that are produced by allospecific B-cells and plasma cells in AMR, eculizumab is being investigated for use within this indication. Three case reports have described the successful use of eculizumab for the prevention and treatment of AMR in LTRs. Given this lack of robust data, evidence for the use of eculizumab in other solid organ transplant recipients is of increased value. Early experiences from a single center's use of eculizumab in LTRs are also described. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE Lung transplant is a recognized treatment for end-stage lung disease, though complications posttransplant can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While prevention and management of AMR remains a substantial challenge without comprehensive guidance from societal guidelines, recently published literature may be helpful to guide clinical practice using alternative treatment options. However, this remains an area of great clinical importance, given the impact of AMR on long-term allograft function. CONCLUSIONS Optimizing use of current therapies, as well as identifying and advancing novel therapeutic modalities such as eculizumab, are vital for the improvement of AMR prevention and treatment in LTRs to extend long-term allograft function and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna L Kleiboeker
- Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alyson Prom
- Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Krista Paplaczyk
- Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Catherine N Myers
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Messika J, Belousova N, Parquin F, Roux A. Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Lung Transplantation: Diagnosis and Therapeutic Armamentarium in a 21st Century Perspective. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12973. [PMID: 39170865 PMCID: PMC11336419 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
Humoral immunity is a major waypoint towards chronic allograft dysfunction in lung transplantation (LT) recipients. Though allo-immunization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are well-known entities, some diagnostic gaps need to be addressed. Morphological analysis could be enhanced by digital pathology and artificial intelligence-based companion tools. Graft transcriptomics can help to identify graft failure phenotypes or endotypes. Donor-derived cell free DNA is being evaluated for graft-loss risk stratification and tailored surveillance. Preventative therapies should be tailored according to risk. The donor pool can be enlarged for candidates with HLA sensitization, with strategies combining plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and immune cell depletion, or with emerging or innovative therapies such as imlifidase or immunoadsorption. In cases of insufficient pre-transplant desensitization, the effects of antibodies on the allograft can be prevented by targeting the complement cascade, although evidence for this strategy in LT is limited. In LT recipients with a humoral response, strategies are combined, including depletion of immune cells (plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption), inhibition of immune pathways, or modulation of the inflammatory cascade, which can be achieved with photopheresis. Altogether, these innovative techniques offer promising perspectives for LT recipients and shape the 21st century's armamentarium against AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Messika
- Thoracic Intensive Care Unit, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
- Physiopathology and Epidemiology of Respiratory Diseases, UMR1152 INSERM and Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Paris Transplant Group, Paris, France
| | - Natalia Belousova
- Paris Transplant Group, Paris, France
- Pneumology, Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center and Lung Transplantation Department, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
| | - François Parquin
- Thoracic Intensive Care Unit, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
- Paris Transplant Group, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Roux
- Paris Transplant Group, Paris, France
- Pneumology, Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center and Lung Transplantation Department, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UVSQ, VIM, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kümpfel T, Giglhuber K, Aktas O, Ayzenberg I, Bellmann-Strobl J, Häußler V, Havla J, Hellwig K, Hümmert MW, Jarius S, Kleiter I, Klotz L, Krumbholz M, Paul F, Ringelstein M, Ruprecht K, Senel M, Stellmann JP, Bergh FT, Trebst C, Tumani H, Warnke C, Wildemann B, Berthele A. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management. J Neurol 2024; 271:141-176. [PMID: 37676297 PMCID: PMC10770020 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11910-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
This manuscript presents practical recommendations for managing acute attacks and implementing preventive immunotherapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), a rare autoimmune disease that causes severe inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), primarily affecting the optic nerves, spinal cord, and brainstem. The pillars of NMOSD therapy are attack treatment and attack prevention to minimize the accrual of neurological disability. Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG) are a diagnostic marker of the disease and play a significant role in its pathogenicity. Recent advances in understanding NMOSD have led to the development of new therapies and the completion of randomized controlled trials. Four preventive immunotherapies have now been approved for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD in many regions of the world: eculizumab, ravulizumab - most recently-, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. These new drugs may potentially substitute rituximab and classical immunosuppressive therapies, which were as yet the mainstay of treatment for both, AQP4-IgG-positive and -negative NMOSD. Here, the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) provides an overview of the current state of knowledge on NMOSD treatments and offers statements and practical recommendations on the therapy management and use of all available immunotherapies for this disease. Unmet needs and AQP4-IgG-negative NMOSD are also discussed. The recommendations were developed using a Delphi-based consensus method among the core author group and at expert discussions at NEMOS meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Kümpfel
- Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - Katrin Giglhuber
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Orhan Aktas
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ilya Ayzenberg
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Judith Bellmann-Strobl
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vivien Häußler
- Department of Neurology and Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Joachim Havla
- Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hellwig
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Martin W Hümmert
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sven Jarius
- Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ingo Kleiter
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Marianne-Strauß-Klinik, Behandlungszentrum Kempfenhausen für Multiple Sklerose Kranke, Berg, Germany
| | - Luisa Klotz
- Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Markus Krumbholz
- Department of Neurology and Pain Treatment, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, University Hospital of the Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Friedemann Paul
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marius Ringelstein
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR-Klinikum, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Klemens Ruprecht
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Makbule Senel
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jan-Patrick Stellmann
- Department of Neurology and Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- APHM, Hopital de la Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France
- Aix Marseille University, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France
| | | | - Corinna Trebst
- Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Clemens Warnke
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Brigitte Wildemann
- Marianne-Strauß-Klinik, Behandlungszentrum Kempfenhausen für Multiple Sklerose Kranke, Berg, Germany
| | - Achim Berthele
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brandon W, Dunn C, Bollineni S, Joerns J, Lawrence A, Mohanka M, Timofte I, Torres F, Kaza V. Management of donor-specific antibodies in lung transplantation. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2023; 2:1248284. [PMID: 38993917 PMCID: PMC11235237 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1248284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
The formation of antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigens poses a challenging problem both for donor selection as well as postoperative graft function in lung transplantation. These donor-specific antibodies limit the pool of potential donor organs and are associated with episodes of antibody-mediated rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and increased mortality. Optimal management strategies for clearance of DSAs are poorly defined and vary greatly by institution; most of the data supporting any particular strategy is limited to small-scale retrospective cohort studies. A typical approach to antibody depletion may involve the use of high-dose steroids, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and possibly other immunomodulators or small-molecule therapies. This review seeks to define the current understanding of the significance of DSAs in lung transplantation and outline the literature supporting strategies for their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Brandon
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Colin Dunn
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Srinivas Bollineni
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - John Joerns
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Adrian Lawrence
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Manish Mohanka
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Irina Timofte
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Fernando Torres
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Vaidehi Kaza
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Habibabady Z, McGrath G, Kinoshita K, Maenaka A, Ikechukwu I, Elias GF, Zaletel T, Rosales I, Hara H, Pierson RN, Cooper DKC. Antibody-mediated rejection in xenotransplantation: Can it be prevented or reversed? Xenotransplantation 2023; 30:e12816. [PMID: 37548030 PMCID: PMC11101061 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the commonest cause of failure of a pig graft after transplantation into an immunosuppressed nonhuman primate (NHP). The incidence of AMR compared to acute cellular rejection is much higher in xenotransplantation (46% vs. 7%) than in allotransplantation (3% vs. 63%) in NHPs. Although AMR in an allograft can often be reversed, to our knowledge there is no report of its successful reversal in a pig xenograft. As there is less experience in preventing or reversing AMR in models of xenotransplantation, the results of studies in patients with allografts provide more information. These include (i) depletion or neutralization of serum anti-donor antibodies, (ii) inhibition of complement activation, (iii) therapies targeting B or plasma cells, and (iv) anti-inflammatory therapy. Depletion or neutralization of anti-pig antibody, for example, by plasmapheresis, is effective in depleting antibodies, but they recover within days. IgG-degrading enzymes do not deplete IgM. Despite the expression of human complement-regulatory proteins on the pig graft, inhibition of systemic complement activation may be necessary, particularly if AMR is to be reversed. Potential therapies include (i) inhibition of complement activation (e.g., by IVIg, C1 INH, or an anti-C5 antibody), but some complement inhibitors are not effective in NHPs, for example, eculizumab. Possible B cell-targeted therapies include (i) B cell depletion, (ii) plasma cell depletion, (iii) modulation of B cell activation, and (iv) enhancing the generation of regulatory B and/or T cells. Among anti-inflammatory agents, anti-IL6R mAb and TNF blockers are increasingly being tested in xenotransplantation models, but with no definitive evidence that they reverse AMR. Increasing attention should be directed toward testing combinations of the above therapies. We suggest that treatment with a systemic complement inhibitor is likely to be most effective, possibly combined with anti-inflammatory agents (if these are not already being administered). Ultimately, it may require further genetic engineering of the organ-source pig to resolve the problem entirely, for example, knockout or knockdown of SLA, and/or expression of PD-L1, HLA E, and/or HLA-G.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Habibabady
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gannon McGrath
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kohei Kinoshita
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Akihiro Maenaka
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ileka Ikechukwu
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gabriela F. Elias
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tjasa Zaletel
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ivy Rosales
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hidetaka Hara
- Yunnan Xenotransplantation Engineering Research Center, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Richard N. Pierson
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David K. C. Cooper
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Courtwright A, Atkinson C, Pelaez A. The Highly Sensitized Recipient: Pretransplant and Posttransplant Considerations. Clin Chest Med 2023; 44:85-93. [PMID: 36774171 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Highly sensitized patients, who are often black and Hispanic women, are less likely to be listed for lung transplant and are at higher risk for prolonged waitlist time and waitlist death. In this review, the authors discuss strategies for improving access to transplant in this population, including risk stratification of crossing pretransplant donor-specific antibodies, based on antibody characteristics. The authors also review institutional protocols, such as perioperative desensitization, for tailoring transplant immunosuppression in the highly sensitized population. The authors conclude with suggestions for future research, including development of novel donor-specific antibody-directed therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Courtwright
- Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Carl Atkinson
- University of Florida, 1600 Southwest Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Andres Pelaez
- Jackson Health System, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami Transplant Institute, 1801 Northwest 9th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sharma N, Sharma D, Subramaniam K. Curbing proteastasis to combat antibody-mediated rejection post lung transplant. INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2023. [DOI: 10.4103/ijot.ijot_33_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
|
9
|
Sharma D, Krishnan GS, Sharma N, Chandrashekhar A. Current perspective of immunomodulators for lung transplant. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 38:497-505. [PMID: 36050971 PMCID: PMC9424406 DOI: 10.1007/s12055-022-01388-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung transplantation is an effective treatment option for selected patients suffering from end-stage lung disease. More intensive immunosuppression is enforced after lung transplants owing to a greater risk of rejection than after any other solid organ transplants. The commencing of lung transplantation in the modern era was in 1983 when the Toronto Lung Transplant Group executed the first successful lung transplant. A total of 43,785 lung transplants and 1365 heart-lung transplants have been performed from 1 Jan 1988 until 31 Jan 2021. The aim of this review article is to discuss the existing immunosuppressive strategies and emerging agents to prevent acute and chronic rejection in lung transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhruva Sharma
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, SMS Medical College & Attached Hospitals, J L N Marg, Jaipur, 302001 Rajasthan India
| | - Ganapathy Subramaniam Krishnan
- Institute of Heart and Lung Transplant and Mechanical Circulatory Support, MGM Healthcare, No. 72, Nelson Manickam Road, Aminjikarai, Chennai, 600029 Tamil Nadu India
| | - Neha Sharma
- Department of Pharmacology, SMS Medical College & Attached Hospitals, J L N Marg, Jaipur, 302001 Rajasthan India
| | - Anitha Chandrashekhar
- Institute of Heart and Lung Transplant and Mechanical Circulatory Support, MGM Healthcare, No. 72, Nelson Manickam Road, Aminjikarai, Chennai, 600029 Tamil Nadu India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ohm B, Jungraithmayr W. B Cell Immunity in Lung Transplant Rejection - Effector Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Front Immunol 2022; 13:845867. [PMID: 35320934 PMCID: PMC8934882 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.845867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Allograft rejection remains the major hurdle in lung transplantation despite modern immunosuppressive treatment. As part of the alloreactive process, B cells are increasingly recognized as modulators of alloimmunity and initiators of a donor-specific humoral response. In chronically rejected lung allografts, B cells contribute to the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures and promote local alloimmune responses. However, B cells are functionally heterogeneous and some B cell subsets may promote alloimmune tolerance. In this review, we describe the current understanding of B-cell-dependent mechanisms in pulmonary allograft rejection and highlight promising future strategies that employ B cell-targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birte Ohm
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Jungraithmayr
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yerly P, Rotman S, Regamey J, Aubert V, Aur S, Kirsch M, Hullin R, Pascual M. Complement blockade with eculizumab to treat acute symptomatic humoral rejection after heart transplantation. Xenotransplantation 2022; 29:e12726. [PMID: 35001433 PMCID: PMC9285545 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) is a major barrier preventing successful discordant organ xenotransplantation, but it also occurs in allotransplantation due to anti‐HLA antibodies. Symptomatic acute AMR is rare after heart allograft but carries a high risk of mortality, especially >1 year after transplant. As complement activation may play a major role in mediating tissue injury in acute AMR, drugs blocking the terminal complement cascade like eculizumab may be useful, particularly since “standards of care” like plasmapheresis are not based on strong evidence. Eculizumab was successfully used to treat early acute kidney AMR, a typical condition of “active AMR,” but showed mitigated results in late AMR, where “chronic active” lesions are more prevalent. Here, we report the case of a heart recipient who presented with acute heart failure due to late acute AMR with eight de novo donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA), and who fully recovered allograft function and completely cleared DSA following plasmapheresis‐free upfront eculizumab administration in addition to thymoglobulin, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), and rituximab. Several clinical (acute onset, abrupt and severe loss of graft function), biological (sudden high‐level production of DSA), and pathological features (microvascular injury, C4d deposits) of this cardiac recipient are shared with early kidney AMR and may indicate a strong role of complement in the pathogenesis of acute graft injury that may respond to drugs like eculizumab. Terminal complement blockade should be further explored to treat acute AMR in recipients of heart allografts and possibly also in recipients of discordant xenografts in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Yerly
- Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Samuel Rotman
- Service of Clinical Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Julien Regamey
- Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Aubert
- Service of Immunology and Allergology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stefania Aur
- Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Kirsch
- Service of Cardiac Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Roger Hullin
- Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Pascual
- Center for Organ Transplantation, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2021; 272:139-164. [PMID: 34796380 DOI: 10.1007/164_2021_548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Immunosuppression in lung transplantation is an area devoid of robust clinical data. This chapter will review the history of immunosuppression in lung transplantation. Additionally, it will evaluate the three classes of induction, maintenance, and rescue immunosuppression in detail. Induction immunosuppression in lung transplantation aims to decrease incidence of lung allograft rejection, however infectious risk must be considered when determining if induction is appropriate and which agent is most favorable. Similar to other solid organ transplant patient populations, a multi-drug approach is commonly prescribed for maintenance immunosuppression to minimize single agent drug toxicities. Emphasis of this review is placed on key medication considerations including dosing, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Clinical considerations will be reviewed per drug class given available literature. Finally, acute cellular, antibody mediated, and chronic rejection are reviewed.
Collapse
|
13
|
Halverson LP, Hachem RR. Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Lung Transplantation. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 42:428-435. [PMID: 34030204 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is now a widely recognized form of lung allograft rejection, with mounting evidence for AMR as an important risk factor for the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and markedly decreased long-term survival. Despite the recent development of the consensus diagnostic criteria, it remains a challenging diagnosis of exclusion. Furthermore, even after diagnosis, treatment directed at pulmonary AMR has been nearly exclusively derived from practices with other solid-organ transplants and other areas of medicine, such that there is a significant lack of data regarding the efficacy for these in pulmonary AMR. Lastly, outcomes after AMR remain quite poor despite aggressive treatment. In this review, we revisit the history of AMR in lung transplantation, describe our current understanding of its pathophysiology, discuss the use and limitations of the consensus diagnostic criteria, review current treatment strategies, and summarize long-term outcomes. We conclude with a synopsis of our most pressing gaps in knowledge, introduce recommendations for future directions, and highlight promising areas of active research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura P Halverson
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Ramsey R Hachem
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Desensitization and management of allograft rejection. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2021; 26:314-320. [PMID: 33938468 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) limits the success of lung transplantation. Among the risk factors associated with CLAD, we recognize pretransplant circulating antibodies against the human leukocyte antigens (HLA), acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This review will summarize current data surrounding management of desensitization, ACR, AMR, and CLAD. RECENT FINDINGS Strategies in managing in highly sensitized patients waiting for lung transplant include avoidance of specific HLA antigens and reduction of circulating anti-HLA antibodies at time of transplant. Several multimodal approaches have been studied in the treatment of AMR with a goal to clear circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and to halt the production of new antibodies. Different immunosuppressive strategies focus on influence of the host immune system, particularly T-cell responses, in order to prevent ACR and the progression of CLAD. SUMMARY The lack of significant evidence and consensus limits to draw conclusion regarding the impact of specific immunosuppressive regimens in the management of HLA antibodies, ACR, and CLAD. Development of novel therapeutic agents and use of multicenter randomized clinical trials will allow to better define patient-specific treatments and improve the length and quality of life of lung transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Meier RPH, Longchamp A, Mohiuddin M, Manuel O, Vrakas G, Maluf DG, Buhler LH, Muller YD, Pascual M. Recent progress and remaining hurdles toward clinical xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2021; 28:e12681. [PMID: 33759229 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Xenotransplantation has made tremendous progress over the last decade. METHODS We discuss kidney and heart xenotransplantation, which are nearing initial clinical trials. RESULTS Life sustaining genetically modified kidney xenografts can now last for approximately 500 days and orthotopic heart xenografts for 200 days in non-human primates. Anti-swine specific antibody screening, preemptive desensitization protocols, complement inhibition and targeted immunosuppression are currently being adapted to xenotransplantation with the hope to achieve better control of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and improve xenograft longevity. These newest advances could probably facilitate future clinical trials, a significant step for the medical community, given that dialysis remains difficult for many patients and can have prohibitive costs. Performing a successful pig-to-human clinical kidney xenograft, that could last for more than a year after transplant, seems feasible but it still has significant potential hurdles to overcome. The risk/benefit balance is progressively reaching an acceptable equilibrium for future human recipients, e.g. those with a life expectancy inferior to two years. The ultimate question at this stage would be to determine if a "proof of concept" in humans is desirable, or whether further experimental/pre-clinical advances are still needed to demonstrate longer xenograft survival in non-human primates. CONCLUSION In this review, we discuss the most recent advances in kidney and heart xenotransplantation, with a focus on the prevention and treatment of AMR and on the recipient's selection, two aspects that will likely be the major points of discussion in the first pig organ xenotransplantation clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael P H Meier
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alban Longchamp
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Muhammad Mohiuddin
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Oriol Manuel
- Transplantation Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Georgios Vrakas
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel G Maluf
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Leo H Buhler
- Faculty of Science and Medicine, Section of Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Yannick D Muller
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Pascual
- Transplantation Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schwotzer N, Paganetti G, Barchi M, Perrottet N, Aubert V, Sadallah S, Rotman S, Venetz JP, Matter M, Golshayan D, Pascual M. Upfront use of eculizumab to treat early acute antibody-mediated rejection after kidney allotransplantation and relevance for xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2020; 27:e12630. [PMID: 32698246 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) early after transplant remains a challenge, both in allotransplantation and in xenotransplantation. We report the case of an early and severe acute AMR episode in a kidney transplant recipient that was successfully treated with upfront eculizumab. A 58-year-old woman had been on dialysis since 2014. She underwent a first kidney transplant in 2018 with primary non-function and received several blood transfusions. Postoperatively, she developed anti-HLA antibodies. One year later, she received a second allograft from a deceased donor. At day 0, there was only one preformed low-level donor-specific antibody (DSA) anti-DQ7. After initial excellent allograft function, serum creatinine increased on days 7-9, and this was associated with oligo-anuria. On day 7, there was an increase in her DSA anti-DQ7 and 4 de novo DSA had developed at high MFI values. Allograft biopsy showed severe active AMR with diffuse C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries. The early acute AMR episode was treated with upfront eculizumab administration (2 doses) with efficient CH50 blockade (< 10% CH50). Rituximab was also administered on day 12, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was given over the following days. There was an excellent clinical response to eculizumab administration. Eculizumab administration rapidly reversed the acute AMR episode without the need for plasmapheresis. Rituximab and IVIG were also used as B-cell immunomodulators to decrease DSA. Blocking efficiently the terminal complement pathway may become a useful strategy to treat acute AMR in sensitized recipients of allografts, and possibly in recipients of discordant xenografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Schwotzer
- Transplantation Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Giulia Paganetti
- Transplantation Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Matteo Barchi
- Transplantation Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nancy Perrottet
- Service of Pharmacy, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Aubert
- Service of Immunology and Allergy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Salima Sadallah
- Service of Immunology and Allergy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Samuel Rotman
- Service of clinical Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Pierre Venetz
- Transplantation Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maurice Matter
- Visceral Surgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Dela Golshayan
- Transplantation Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Pascual
- Transplantation Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Muller YD, Vionnet J, Beyeler F, Eigenmann P, Caubet J, Villard J, Berney T, Scherer K, Spertini F, Fricker MP, Lang C, Schmid‐Grendelmeier P, Benden C, Roux Lombard P, Aubert V, Immer F, Pascual M, Harr T. Management of allergy transfer upon solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:834-843. [PMID: 31535461 PMCID: PMC7065229 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Allergy transfer upon solid organ transplantation has been reported in the literature, although only few data are available as to the frequency, significance, and management of these cases. Based on a review of 577 consecutive deceased donors from the Swisstransplant Donor-Registry, 3 cases (0.5%) of fatal anaphylaxis were identified, 2 because of peanut and 1 of wasp allergy. The sera of all 3 donors and their 10 paired recipients, prospectively collected before and after transplantation for the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study, were retrospectively processed using a commercial protein microarray fluorescent test. As early as 5 days posttransplantation, newly acquired peanut-specific IgE were transiently detected from 1 donor to 3 recipients, of whom 1 liver and lung recipients developed grade III anaphylaxis. Yet, to define how allergy testing should be performed in transplant recipients and to better understand the impact of immunosuppressive therapy on IgE sensitization, we prospectively studied 5 atopic living-donor kidney recipients. All pollen-specific IgE and >90% of skin prick tests remained positive 7 days and 3 months after transplantation, indicating that early diagnosis of donor-derived IgE sensitization is possible. Importantly, we propose recommendations with respect to safety for recipients undergoing solid-organ transplantation from donors with a history of fatal anaphylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick D. Muller
- Division of Immunology and AllergyDepartment of MedicineUniversity Hospitals and University of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland,Transplantation CenterLausanne University Hospital and University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland,Department of SurgeryUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCalifornia
| | - Julien Vionnet
- Transplantation CenterLausanne University Hospital and University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland,Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Philippe Eigenmann
- Pediatric Allergy UnitDepartment of Women-Children-TeenagersPediatric Allergy UnitUniversity Hospitals of Geneva and University of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
| | - Jean‐Christoph Caubet
- Pediatric Allergy UnitDepartment of Women-Children-TeenagersPediatric Allergy UnitUniversity Hospitals of Geneva and University of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
| | - Jean Villard
- Department of Genetic, Laboratory and Pathology MedicineGeneva University HospitalsGenevaSwitzerland
| | - Thierry Berney
- Division of TransplantationDepartment of SurgeryGeneva University HospitalsGenevaSwitzerland
| | - Kathrin Scherer
- Division of Allergy and DermatologyUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Francois Spertini
- Service of Immunology and AllergyLausanne University Hospital and University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Michael P. Fricker
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and AllergyInselspitalBernSwitzerland
| | - Claudia Lang
- Allergy UnitDepartment of DermatologyUniversity Hospital of ZürichZürichSwitzerland
| | | | - Christian Benden
- Division of Pulmonary MedicineUniversity Hospital of ZürichZürichSwitzerland
| | - Pascale Roux Lombard
- Division of Immunology and AllergyDepartment of MedicineUniversity Hospitals and University of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
| | - Vincent Aubert
- Service of Immunology and AllergyLausanne University Hospital and University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
| | | | - Manuel Pascual
- Transplantation CenterLausanne University Hospital and University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Thomas Harr
- Division of Immunology and AllergyDepartment of MedicineUniversity Hospitals and University of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bery AI, Hachem RR. Antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:411. [PMID: 32355855 PMCID: PMC7186640 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been identified as a significant form of acute allograft dysfunction in lung transplantation. The development of consensus diagnostic criteria has created a uniform definition of AMR; however, significant limitations of these criteria have been identified. Treatment modalities for AMR have been adapted from other areas of medicine and data on the effectiveness of these therapies in AMR are limited. AMR is often refractory to these therapies, and graft failure and death are common. AMR is associated with increased rates of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and poor long-term survival. In this review, we discuss the history of AMR and describe known mechanisms, application of the consensus diagnostic criteria, data for current treatment strategies, and long-term outcomes. In addition, we highlight current gaps in knowledge, ongoing research, and future directions to address these gaps. Promising diagnostic techniques are actively being investigated that may allow for early detection and treatment of AMR. We conclude that further investigation is required to identify and define chronic and subclinical AMR, and head-to-head comparisons of currently used treatment protocols are necessary to identify an optimal treatment approach. Gaps in knowledge regarding the epidemiology, mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of AMR continue to exist and future research should focus on these aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit I Bery
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ramsey R Hachem
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tan EK, Bentall AJ, Dean PG, Shaheen MF, Stegall MD, Schinstock CA. Use of Eculizumab for Active Antibody-mediated Rejection That Occurs Early Post-kidney Transplantation: A Consecutive Series of 15 Cases. Transplantation 2019; 103:2397-2404. [PMID: 30801549 PMCID: PMC6699919 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) that occurs during the amnestic response within the first month posttransplant is a rare but devastating cause of early allograft loss after kidney transplant. Prior reports of eculizumab treatment for AMR have been in heterogeneous patient groups needing salvage therapy or presenting at varied time points. We investigated the role of eculizumab as primary therapy for active AMR early posttransplant. METHODS We performed a retrospective observational study of a consecutive cohort of solitary kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted between January 1, 2014, and January 31, 2018, and had AMR within the first 30 days posttransplant and treated with eculizumab ± plasmapheresis. RESULTS Fifteen patients had early active AMR at a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 10 (7-11) days posttransplant and were treated with eculizumab ± plasmapheresis. Thirteen cases were biopsy proven, and 2 cases were presumed on the basis of donor-specific antibody trends and allograft function. Within 1 week of treatment, the median estimated glomerular filtration rate increased from 21 to 34 mL/min (P = 0.001); and persistent active AMR was only found in 16.7% (2/12) of biopsied patients within 4-6 months. No graft losses occurred, and at last follow-up (median [IQR] of 13 [12-19] mo), the median IQR estimated glomerular filtration rate increased to 52 (46-60) mL/min. CONCLUSIONS Prompt eculizumab treatment as primary therapy is safe and effective for early active AMR after kidney transplant or abrupt increases in donor-specific antibodies when biopsy cannot be performed for diagnosis confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ek Khoon Tan
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Andrew J. Bentall
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Patrick G. Dean
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Mark D. Stegall
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Carrie A. Schinstock
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yamanashi K, Chen-Yoshikawa TF, Hamaji M, Yurugi K, Tanaka S, Yutaka Y, Yamada Y, Nakajima D, Ohsumi A, Date H. Outcomes of combination therapy including rituximab for antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 68:142-149. [DOI: 10.1007/s11748-019-01189-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|