A Systematic Review for Variables to Be Collected in a Transplant Database for Improving Risk Prediction

Multifocal Burkholderia cepacia Infection in Postrenal Transplantation Fever : Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in Treatment Optimization

ABSTRACT

Nosocomial Burkholderia cepacia infection in the clinical setting of postrenal transplantation pyrexia of unknown origin and the role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in treatment optimization in such situation is presented in this report. The consequence of fastidious infection by nosocomial colonizing organisms like B. cepacia can be catastrophic in immunocompromised postrenal transplant individuals causing severe urinary tract infection. In the presented case, following 2 weeks of IV antibiotics, the patient didn't show clinical response, and FDG PET scan recognized multifocal infective sites early, likely representing immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and timely appropriate and optimal treatment salvaged the renal graft.

Kidney transplant in the next decade: Strategies, challenges and vision of the future

Although the results of kidney transplantation (KT) have improved substantially in recent years, a chronic and inexorable loss of grafts mainly due to the death of the patient and chronic dysfunction of the KT, continues to be observed. The objectives, thus, to optimize this situation in the next decade are fundamentally focused on minimizing the rate of kidney graft loss, improving patient survival, increasing the rate of organ procurement and its distribution, promoting research and training in health professionals and the development of scientific registries providing clinical and reliable information that allow us to optimize our clinical practice in the field of KT. With this perspective, this review will deep into: (1) strategies to avoid chronic dysfunction and graft loss in the medium and long term; (2) to prolong patient survival; (3) strategies to increase the donation, maintenance and allocation of organs; (4) promote clinical and basic research and training activity in KT; and (5) the analysis of the results in KT by optimizing and merging scientific registries.

An Overview of Solid Organ Transplantation in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease

Sickle cell disease is a common genetic disorder affecting >300 000 people across the world. The vast majority of patients cared for in high-resource settings live well into adulthood, but many develop a high burden of disease complications. Good standard of care including disease-modifying agents and transfusion programs limits the number of patients who develop end-stage organ disease, but for those that do, the prognosis can be very poor. Solid organ transplantation is a well-established mode of treatment for patients with sickle cell disease and kidney or liver failure, but appropriate patient selection and perioperative management are important for achieving good outcomes. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and gene therapy may offer novel treatment options for adult patients with chronic organ damage in the future, but these are not yet widely available. For now, good, holistic care and early intervention of end-organ complications can minimize the number of patients requiring solid organ transplantation later in life.

[Follow-up strategies for lung transplant recipients in France]

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation (LT) requires sustained care for a frequently polypathological condition. Follow-up is focused on three main issues: 1/stability of respiratory function; 2/comorbidity management; 3/preventive medicine. About 3000 LT patients in France are treated in 11 LT centers. Given the increased size of the LT recipient cohort, follow-up might be partially shared with peripheral centers.

METHODS

This paper presents the suggestions of a working group of the SPLF (French-speaking respiratory medicine society) on possible modalities of shared follow-up.

RESULTS

While the main LT center is tasked with centralizing follow-up, particularly the choice of optimal immunosuppression, an identified peripheral center (PC) may serve as an alternative to deal with acute events, comorbidities and routine assessment. Communication between the different centers should be free-flowing. Shared follow-up may be offered from the 3rd postoperative year to stable and consenting patients, whereas unstable and non-observant patients are poor candidates.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines may serve as a reference for any pneumologist wishing to effectively contribute to follow-up, even and especially subsequent to lung transplant.

Baseline Characteristics and Representativeness of Participants in the BEST-Fluids Trial: A Randomized Trial of Balanced Crystalloid Solution Versus Saline in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a major complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation. Saline (0.9% sodium chloride) is a commonly used intravenous fluid in transplantation but may increase the risk of DGF because of its high chloride content. Better Evidence for Selecting Transplant Fluids (BEST-Fluids), a pragmatic, registry-based, double-blind, randomized trial, sought to determine whether using a balanced low-chloride crystalloid solution (Plasma-Lyte 148) instead of saline would reduce DGF. We sought to evaluate the generalizability of the trial cohort by reporting the baseline characteristics and representativeness of the trial participants in detail.

METHODS

We compared the characteristics of BEST-Fluids participants with those of a contemporary cohort of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients in Australia and New Zealand using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. To explore potential international differences, we compared trial participants with a cohort of transplant recipients in the United States using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

RESULTS

During the trial recruitment period, 2373 deceased donor kidney transplants were performed in Australia and New Zealand; 2178 were eligible' and 808 were enrolled in BEST-Fluids. Overall, trial participants and nonparticipants were similar at baseline. Trial participants had more coronary artery disease (standardized difference [d] = 0.09; P = 0.03), longer dialysis duration (d = 0.18, P < 0.001), and fewer hypertensive (d = -0.11, P = 0.03) and circulatory death (d = -0.14, P < 0.01) donors than nonparticipants. Most key characteristics were similar between trial participants and US recipients, with moderate differences (|d| ≥ 0.2; all P < 0.001) in kidney failure cause, diabetes, dialysis duration, ischemic time, and several donor risk predictors, likely reflecting underlying population differences.

CONCLUSIONS

BEST-Fluids participants had more comorbidities and received slightly fewer high-risk deceased donor kidneys but were otherwise representative of Australian and New Zealand transplant recipients and were generally similar to US recipients. The trial results should be broadly applicable to deceased donor kidney transplantation practice worldwide.

Long-term mortality among kidney transplant recipients with and without diabetes: a nationwide cohort study in the USA

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the role diabetes (type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D)) plays in modifying prognosis among kidney transplant recipients. Here, we compare mortality among transplant recipients with T1D, T2D and non-diabetes-related end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We included 254 188 first-time single kidney transplant recipients aged ≥18 years from the US Renal Data System (2000-2018). Diabetes status, as primary cause of ESKD, was defined using International Classification of Disease 9th and 10th Clinical Modification codes. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models (right-censored) computed risk of death associated with T1D and T2D relative to non-diabetes. Trends in standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) (2000-2017), relative to the general US population, were assessed using Joinpoint regression.

RESULTS

A total of 72 175 (28.4%) deaths occurred over a median survival time of 14.6 years. 5-year survival probabilities were 88%, 85% and 77% for non-diabetes, T1D and T2D, respectively. In adjusted models, mortality was highest for T1D (HR=1.95, (95% CI: 1.88 to 2.03)) and then T2D (1.65 (1.62 to 1.69)), as compared with non-diabetes. SMRs declined for non-diabetes, T1D, and T2D. However, in 2017, SMRs were 2.38 (2.31 to 2.45), 6.55 (6.07 to 7.06), and 3.82 (3.68 to 3.98), for non-diabetes, T1D and T2D, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the USA, diabetes type is an important modifier in mortality risk among kidney transplant recipients with highest rates among people with T1D-related ESKD. Development of effective interventions that reduce excess mortality in transplant recipients with diabetes is needed, especially for T1D.

Research priorities in Fontan-associated liver disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) is an emerging condition in patients who have undergone surgical correction of univentricular congenital heart disease. There is little known about the epidemiology of FALD, including risk factors for end-organ failure or hepatocellular carcinoma nor a consensus on surveillance guidelines. Furthermore, there is a need to understand the role of heart versus combined heart-liver transplantation in this population. Research is limited by systemic barriers hindering the ability to track longitudinal FALD outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nearly all patients post-Fontan develop histological features of FALD as a function of time post-Fontan, regardless of Fontan hemodynamics. In cases of end-organ disease, single-center studies have shown promising outcomes of combined heart-liver transplant in this population, with decreased rates of acute rejection. However, despite the burden of disease, it is not currently possible to identify the population of patients with FALD using existing clinical databases and registries due to a lack of diagnostic codes.

SUMMARY

Strategies proposed to address barriers to understanding FALD include developing appropriate diagnostic and transplant-related codes for existing registries. Efforts should also be targeted at initiating prospective studies to understand recognized comorbidities related to Fontan physiology, guided by a team of multidisciplinary subspecialists.

Donor-related Risk Factors Associated With Increased Mortality After Lung Transplant

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant is a surgical procedure for end-stage lung disease. Many factors related to lung donors influence the outcome of transplant. The main aim of this single-center study was to assess which donor-related and procedure-related factors would influence the 30-day or hospital mortality of the recipients.

METHODS

This retrospective study group consisted of 110 donor-recipient pairs undergoing lung transplant between 2012 and 2017 (group 1) and 2018 and 2019 (group 2) in Silesian Center for Heart Diseases. Both groups of donor- and procedure-related factors were included in the analysis: oxygenation index at reporting of the donor, time donor spent in the intensive care unit (ICU), presence of cardiac arrest while being in the ICU, donor age, type of transplant, cumulative ischemia time, duration of the operation, and time of mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

The type of surgery was significantly associated with an increase in the chance of death within 30 days. Patients who underwent single lung transplant had a 20.217 times greater chance of dying within 30 days than patients after double lung transplant (interquartile range, 2.116-193.125).

CONCLUSIONS

Single lung transplant increases the risk of death during the first 30 days after lung transplant, and using lungs from older donors may increase the rate of hospital mortality. Oxygenation index, sudden cardiac arrest of the donors, and donor time spent in the ICU do not impact the short-term mortality of lung graft recipients.