Digital Wings: Innovations in Transition Readiness for Adolescent and Young Adult Transplant Recipients [corrected]

Lost in transition? Loss of follow-up and quality of life in adults after resection of choledochal malformation in childhood

Objectives

Choledochal malformation (CM) is a rare disease that can lead to malignancy and potential long-term sequelae despite surgical resection. There is no long-term follow-up data on patients after CM resection in Germany. We aimed to determine the long-term outcome of our patients with a duration of follow-up >10 years and focused on long-term sequelae and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Methods

All patients who had undergone CM-resection in our department from 01/1978 to 06/2009 were contacted. Patients were interviewed about postoperative complications and their present medical attendance. HRQOL was determined using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL), version for adults. The PedsQL scales the HRQOL from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. Scores were compared to those published for a healthy population.

Results

Out of 56 patients who were contacted, 23 (41 %) participated. The median age at time of surgery was 3.1 years (6 days-16.1 years) and at time of the survey 24.3 years (11.1-53.8 years). Eighteen patients (78 %) had ceased their gastroenterologic follow-up at a median time of 4.3 years after surgery. Five (22 %) were still in gastroenterologic follow-up, two of these had an uneventful clinical course, and three (13 %) had ongoing complications attributed to the CM. One of these had undergone hemihepatectomy 34 years postoperatively due to bile duct stenosis, one had undergone removal of bile duct stones 14 years postoperatively, and one suffered from portal vein thrombosis with esophageal and jejunal varices. There was no mortality in our series. Median total HRQOL score was 89. There was no significant difference in the median total health, physical health, and psychosocial health scores of our patients in comparison to the healthy population.

Conclusions

We confirmed that the majority of patients after CM resection are lost to follow-up. Those who answered our questionnaire showed a good HRQOL. Given the high rate of severe long-term complications and the life-long risk of malignancy, we recommend a transition program for all patients.

Implementation of a mobile application for outpatient care after liver transplantation

Background

In the face of the Covid-19 pandemic and the need for social distancing new therapeutic tools like mobile health applications might gain in importance for outpatient care. Objective of the present study was to assess if and to what extent the implementation of a free available transplant application in a cohort of liver transplant recipients was possible.

Methods

Patients of the aftercare program at the Department of Transplant Surgery Graz in June 2016 were first asked to complete a survey concerning knowledge about mobile health and their management of everyday life. After using the application for 2 months a second survey evaluated whether the implementation of the application in the daily routine was achievable.

Results

Among 135 patients, 124 (91.9%) agreed to participate. Seventy-one (57.3%) owned a mobile device with which they could use the application, 42 patients (33.8%) decided to try it out for 2 months. The majority stated that the application supported them for therapy management and surveillance of vital parameters. Successful implementation of the application has been reached in 57.1% of patients after 2 months testing period.

Conclusion

The technical prerequisites are only partially met and should be improved. Older patients need extensive support and motivation.

Liver transplantation during COVID-19: Adaptive measures with future significance

Following the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a disease caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the field of liver transplantation, along with many other aspects of healthcare, underwent drastic changes. Despite an initial increase in waitlist mortality and a decrease in both living and deceased donor liver transplantation rates, through the implementation of a series of new measures, the transplant community was able to recover by the summer of 2020. Changes in waitlist prioritization, the gradual implementation of telehealth, and immunosuppressive regimen alterations amidst concerns regarding more severe disease in immunocompromised patients, were among the changes implemented in an attempt by the transplant community to adapt to the pandemic. More recently, with the advent of the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine, a powerful new preventative tool against infection, the pandemic is slowly beginning to subside. The pandemic has certainly brought transplant centers around the world to their limits. Despite the unspeakable tragedy, COVID-19 constitutes a valuable lesson for health systems to be more prepared for potential future health crises and for life-saving transplantation not to fall behind.

Dialysis, Distress, and Difficult Conversations: Living with a Kidney Transplant

Background: Providing holistic care to kidney patients is important; however, without full consideration of the perspectives of people living with a kidney transplant, the provision of truly ‘holistic healthcare’ cannot be possible. It is imperative to understand patient experiences by including kidney patients in key strategies and future renal service planning. Ignoring these important patient views means that there is a significant risk of inappropriate renal service provision and lack of adequate support, impacting overall health. The aim of this study was to develop an in-depth understanding of the lived experiences of kidney transplant recipients. Methods: A total of 23 participants were recruited between two regional nephrology units within the United Kingdom via clinical gatekeepers. In-depth interviews were undertaken. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results: Two themes emerged: “managing ongoing fears of dialysis, distress, and COVID-19” and “dealing with difficult conversations”. Conclusions: Renal healthcare professionals need to understand more than the biological impact of receiving a kidney transplant. Understanding the holistic and multidomain experiences that these participants experience will help healthcare professionals to recognize the needs of this group and ensure more responsive psychosocial care.