Body Weight Parameters are Related to Morbidity and Mortality After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

MASH Continues as a Significant Burden on Metabolic Health of Liver Recipients

BACKGROUND

Metabolic complications are a recognized health concern in liver transplant recipients that result in inferior patient-reported outcomes. Patients with MASH are known to be disproportionately affected by metabolic diseases compared to other indications for transplantation.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of metabolic abnormalities in liver recipients with specific focus on differences between patients transplanted for MASH and non-MASH-causes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational, monocentric, and retrospective analysis was performed. Patients who received a cadaveric-donor-liver transplant between 2010 and 2019 were eligible.

RESULTS

282 patients were enrolled with a median age of 52 years (66.7% males). Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) led to liver transplant in 8.2% of cases. De-novo metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in 36% of the study population. Patients that underwent transplant owing to MASH showed significantly higher incidence of metabolic complications in both pre- and post-transplant period. Considerable differences were noted in the pattern of weight gain between patients transplanted for MASH and non-MASH patients. The MASH etiology (OR: 5.5; 95% CI: 1.624-22.868; P = .010), higher BMI at 1-year post-transplant (OR: 1.321; 95% CI: 1.214-1.449; P = <.001), and older age at transplant (OR: 1.038; 95% CI: 1.006-1.074; P = .022) were independently associated with new-onset metabolic syndrome in liver recipients.

CONCLUSION

Metabolic complications were prevalent in liver recipients. Liver recipients with underlying MASH significantly surpassed patients transplanted for other indications in terms of metabolic complications incidence and demonstrated an unfavorable trajectory of weight gain post-transplant.

Waitlist and posttransplantation outcomes of lean individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Lean individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represent a subset of patients with a distinct risk factor profile. We assessed the association between body mass index (BMI) on waitlist and postliver transplantation (LT) outcomes among these patients. We retrospectively analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing data, including adult patients with NAFLD listed for LT between February 27, 2002, and June 30, 2020. We first used competing risk analyses to estimate the association of BMI with waitlist removal due to death or clinical deterioration. We then conducted Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models to determine the impact of weight change during the waiting list on all-cause mortality and graft failure after LT. Patients with normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ) suffered higher waitlist removal (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.43; p = 0.001) compared with patients with obesity class I (BMI 30-34.9 kg/m 2 ). Those who remained at normal weight had higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.61, 95% CI 1.32-1.96; p  <0.001) and graft failure (aHR 1.57, 95% CI 1.32-1.88; p  <0.001) than patients with stable obesity. Among patients with normal weight, those with the greatest weight increase (BMI gain ≥3 kg/m 2 ) had lower all-cause mortality (aHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.93; p = 0.03) and graft failure (aHR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.81; p = 0.01) compared with patients with stable weight (BMI change ≤1 kg/m 2 ). Patients with NAFLD with normal weight have increased waitlist removal and those who remained at normal weight during the waitlist period have worse posttransplantation outcomes. Identifying and addressing factors influencing apparent healthy weight prior to LT are crucial to mitigate poor outcomes.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers.

METHODS

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development.

RESULTS

This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.

Current status of liver transplantation for non-B non-C liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

Recently, non-B non-C chronic liver diseases, including alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), have markedly increased worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as decompensated liver cirrhosis. In Japan, where the source of liver grafts is strongly dependent on living donors, efforts have been made to unify the indications for eligibility of HCC patients for LT, leading to the development of 5-5-500 criteria. Along with the expansion of eligibility for LT, the current changing trends in underlying liver diseases of LT recipients, which are related to the rising tide of non-B non-C cirrhosis and HCC, are highlighting the importance of peri-transplant management of patients with various comorbidities. The post-LT prognosis of patients with ALD is significantly affected by de novo malignancies and metabolic syndrome-related complications as well as posttransplant alcohol relapse. NAFLD/NASH patients often suffer from obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and other metabolic syndrome-related disorders, and nonneoplastic factors such as cardiovascular events and recurrence of NAFLD/NASH have a significant impact on post-LT outcomes. Patient management in the peri-transplant period as well as risk assessment for LT are key to improving post-LT outcomes in the era of a growing number of cases of LT for non-B non-C liver diseases.

Management of Diabetes in Candidates for Liver Transplantation and in Transplant Recipients

Diabetes is common in patients waitlisted for liver transplantation because of end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular cancer as well as in posttransplant phase (posttransplantation diabetes mellitus). In both conditions, the presence of diabetes severely affects disease burden and long-term clinical outcomes; careful monitoring and appropriate treatment are pivotal to reduce cardiovascular events and graft and recipients' death. We thoroughly reviewed the epidemiology of diabetes in the transplant setting and the different therapeutic options, from lifestyle intervention to antidiabetic drug use-including the most recent drug classes available-and to the inclusion of bariatric surgery in the treatment cascade. In waitlisted patients, the old paradigm that insulin should be the treatment of choice in the presence of severe liver dysfunction is no longer valid; novel antidiabetic agents may provide adequate glucose control without the risk of hypoglycemia, also offering cardiovascular protection. The same evidence applies to the posttransplant phase, where oral or injectable noninsulin agents should be considered to treat patients to target, limiting the impact of disease on daily living, without interaction with immunosuppressive regimens. The increasing prevalence of liver disease of metabolic origin (nonalcoholic fatty liver) among liver transplant candidates, also having a higher risk of noncirrhotic hepatocellular cancer, is likely to accelerate the acceptance of new drugs and invasive procedures, as suggested by international guidelines. Intensive lifestyle intervention programs remain however mandatory, both before and after transplantation. Achievement of adequate control is mandatory to increase candidacy, to prevent delisting, and to improve long-term outcomes.

Obesity surgery in patients with end-stage organ failure: Is it worth it?

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the long-term outcomes of patients with end-stage organ failure (ESOF) undergoing obesity surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the perioperative and mid-term outcomes of patients with ESOF undergoing obesity surgery.

SETTING

University hospital, Germany.

METHODS

A total of 1 094 patients undergoing obesity surgery from 2006 to 2019 were screened. Inclusion criteria were ejection fraction <30%, continuous oxygen/noninvasive ventilation therapy, liver cirrhosis, or kidney failure stage 4/5. ESOF patients were compared with matched standard (MS) patients without advanced organ failure and matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), operation type, diabetes, arterial hypertension, and sleep apnea.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven ESOF patients (56% female, age 50.3 ± 8.6, BMI 53.8 ± 8.7 kg/m²) were identified. Eighty-five percent had a sleeve gastrectomy. Mid-term total weight loss was 26.6% ± 9.0% in the ESOF patients versus 17.8% ± 11.1% in MS patients (P = .181). Long-term improvement of type 2 diabetes was comparable (ESOF: HbA1C 8.79 ± 2.06% to 6.25±1.17%, P = .047; MS: HbA1C 7.94 ± 2.02% to 7.2 ± 1.28%; P = .343). Depression scores (Patient Health Questionnaire 9) among ESOF patients improved from 13.0 ± 6.3 to 6.1 ± 5.8 (P = .004) but without significant change in MS patients (9.4 ± 7.3 to 4.3 ± 5.7; P = .082). Lung function improved in all patients although only 15% were off oxygen therapy. Treatment goals were achieved in >50% of the other groups. Major complications occurred in 11% (ESOF) versus 4% (MS) of patients (P = .299) with one death in the ESOF group (4%).

CONCLUSION

Both groups had similar outcomes regarding weight loss and co-morbidity improvement. Depression only improved significantly in the ESOF group. Patients with ESOF should not be precluded from obesity surgery. Further investigation is needed to define optimized selection criteria.

Multidirectional facets of obesity management in the metabolic syndrome population after liver transplantation

The obesity pandemic has resulted in an increasing demand for liver transplantation and has significantly altered the profile of liver transplant candidates in addition to affecting posttransplantation outcomes. In this review, we discuss a broad range of clinical approaches that warrant attention to provide comprehensive and patient‐centred medical care to liver transplant recipients, and to be prepared to confront the rapidly changing clinical challenges and ensuing dilemmas. Adipose tissue is a complex and metabolically active organ. Visceral fat deposition is a key predictor of overall obesity‐related morbidity and mortality. Limited pharmacological options are available for the treatment of obesity in the liver transplant population. Bariatric surgery may be an alternative in eligible patients. The rapidly increasing prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global concern; NAFLD affects both pre‐ and posttransplantation outcomes. Numerous studies have investigated pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of NAFLD and some of these have shown promising results. Liver transplant recipients are constantly exposed to numerous factors that result in intestinal microbiota alterations, which were linked to the development of obesity, diabetes type 2, metabolic syndrome (MS), NAFLD, and hepatocellular cancer. Microbiota modifications with probiotics and prebiotics bring gratifying results in the management of metabolic complications. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is successfully performed in many medical indications. However, the safety and efficacy profiles of FMT in immunocompromised patients remain unclear. Obesity together with immunosuppressive treatment, may affect the pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic properties of coadministered medications. Individualized immunosuppressive regimens are recommended following liver transplantation to address possible metabolic concerns. Effective and comprehensive management of metabolic complications is shown to yield multiple beneficial results in the liver transplant population and may bring gratifying results in improving long‐term survival rates.

Sleeve gastrectomy prior to liver transplantation is superior to medical weight loss in reducing posttransplant metabolic complications

Strategies to optimize the management of obesity-related metabolic complications after liver transplantation (LT) are needed. We examined the effect of pre-LT sleeve gastrectomy (SG), as compared to medical weight loss (MWL), on post-LT outcomes. This is a cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with medically complicated obesity who were eligible for pre-LT SG and underwent LT from January 1, 2006 to June 1, 2016. Logistic regression models evaluated the association of SG on post-LT diabetes and hypertension, defined as new-onset or progressive disease post-LT. Cox regression models evaluated the association of SG on recurrent and de novo nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Among 70 LT recipients who were eligible for pre-LT SG, 14 (20%) underwent SG and 56 (80%) underwent MWL only. Mean follow-up was 5.2 years post-LT. The SG cohort sustained higher % total body weight loss at 3 years post-LT (28.9% vs. 5.4%, p < .001). In multivariable analyses, SG was associated with significantly lower risk of post-LT diabetes (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.41, p = .01), hypertension (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.67, p = .01), and recurrent and de novo NAFLD (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.91, p = .04). When compared to MWL, SG resulted in sustained weight loss and significantly lower risk of diabetes, hypertension, and recurrent and de novo NAFLD post-LT.

Changing Trends in Liver Transplantation: Challenges and Solutions

Despite improvements in postliver transplant outcomes through refinements in perioperative management and surgical techniques, several changing trends in liver transplantation have presented challenges. Mortality on the waitlist remains high. In the United States, Europe, and the United Kingdom, there is an increasing need for liver transplantation, primarily as a result of increased incidence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis and cancer indications. Meanwhile, donor suitability has decreased, as donors are often older and have more comorbidities. Despite a mismatch between organ need and availability, many organs are discarded. Notwithstanding this, many solutions have been developed to overcome these challenges. Innovative techniques in allograft preservation, viability assessment, and reconditioning have allowed the use of suboptimal organs with adequate results. Refinements in surgical procedures, including live donor liver transplantations, have increased the organ pool and are decreasing the time and mortality on the waitlist. Despite many challenges, a similar number of solutions and prospects are on the horizon. This review seeks to explore the changing trends and challenges in liver transplantation and highlight possible solutions and future directions.

Long-term Management of the Adult Liver Transplantation Recipients

The survival of liver transplantation (LT) recipients has been improved remarkably in short-term. The major causes of mortality in long-term include nonimmunological causes such as cardiovascular, de novo malignancy, chronic kidney disease, and recurrence of primary disease. Rejection-related mortality is rare in the long-term after LT. We discuss nonrejection causes of long-term morbidity/mortality, risk factors, and management strategies in LT recipients. In addition, we discuss osteoporosis, contraception, and pregnancy in LT recipients.

Obesity Management of Liver Transplant Waitlist Candidates and Recipients

Obesity is increasing in prevalence in liver transplant candidates and recipients. The rise in liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis reflects this increase. Management of obesity in liver transplant candidates can be challenging due to the presence of decompensated cirrhosis and sarcopenia. Obesity may increase peritransplant morbidity but does not have an impact on long-term post-transplant survival. Bariatric surgery may be a feasible option in select patients before, during, or after liver transplantation. Use of weight loss drugs and/or endoscopic therapies for obesity management ultimately may play a role in liver transplant patients, but more research is needed to determine safety.

Evaluation and selection of the liver transplant candidate: updates on a dynamic and evolving process

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although conceptually unchanged, the evaluation and selection of the liver transplant candidate has seen significant recent advances. Expanding criteria for transplant candidacy, improved diagnostics for risk stratification and advances in prognostic models have paralleled recent changes in allocation and distribution that require us to revisit core concepts of candidate evaluation and selection while recognizing its now dynamic and continuous nature.

RECENT FINDINGS

The liver transplant evaluation revolves around three interrelated themes: candidate selection, donor selection and transplant outcome. Introduction of dynamic frailty indices, bariatric surgery at the time of liver transplant in obese patients and improved therapies and prognostic tools for hepatobiliary malignancy have transformed candidate selection. Advances in hypothermic organ preservation have improved outcomes in marginal donor organs. Combined with expansion of hepatitis C virus positive and split donor organs, donor selection has become an integral part of candidate evaluation. In addition, with liver transplant for acute alcohol-related hepatitis now widely performed and increasing recognition of acute-on-chronic liver failure, selection of critically ill patients is refining tools to balance futility versus utility.

SUMMARY

Advances in liver transplant candidate evaluation continue to transform the evaluation process and require continued incorporation into our clinical practice amidst a dynamic backdrop of demographic and policy changes.

Peri-transplant management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in liver transplant candidates

The incidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is rapidly growing, affecting 25% of the world population. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the most severe form of NAFLD and affects 1.5% to 6.5% of the world population. Its rising incidence will make end-stage liver disease (ESLD) due to NASH the number one indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the next 10 to 20 years, overtaking Hepatitis C. Patients with NASH also have a high prevalence of associated comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease (CKD), which must be adequately managed during the peritransplant period for optimal post-transplant outcomes. The focus of this review article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the unique challenges these patients present in the peritransplant period, which comprises the pre-transplant, intraoperative, and immediate postoperative periods.

Obesity in the Liver Transplant Setting

The obesity epidemic has resulted in an increased prevalence of obesity in liver transplant (LT) candidates and in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) becoming the fastest growing indication for LT. LT teams will be dealing with obesity in the coming years, and it is necessary for them to recognize some key aspects surrounding the LT in obese patients. Obesity by itself should not be considered a contraindication for LT, but it should make LT teams pay special attention to cardiovascular risk assessment, in order to properly select candidates for LT. Obese patients may be at increased risk of perioperative respiratory and infectious complications, and it is necessary to establish preventive strategies. Data on patient and graft survival after LT are controversial and scarce, especially for long-term outcomes, but morbid obesity may adversely affect these outcomes, particularly in NAFLD. The backbone of obesity treatment should be diet and exercise, whilst being careful not to precipitate or worsen frailty and sarcopenia. Bariatric surgery is an alternative for treatment of obesity, and the ideal timing regarding LT is still unknown. Sleeve gastrectomy is probably the procedure that has the best evidence in LT because it offers a good balance between safety and efficacy.